In the resource recovery industry, resources are often recovered from boreholes in formations containing the targeted resource. A plethora of tools are used in such operations, many of them needing to be actuated remotely. While early actuation configurations comprised mechanical connections only, more recent configurations employ chemical, electrical and mechanical means as well as combinations thereof. The industry has many available configurations and methods but due to evolving conditions and recovery concepts, the industry is always in search of alternate configurations and methods to actuate the various tools that are used.
A magnetic pulse actuation arrangement configured for use in a downhole system, the arrangement including: a workpiece; a layer placed along a portion of the workpiece, the layer having a different magnetic permeability than the workpiece; and, an inductor including a coil and configured to deliver a magnetic pulse to the workpiece to urge the workpiece in a direction, the layer facing the coil.
A method of installing a workpiece in a downhole system, the method including: selectively applying a layer to a portion of the workpiece, the layer having a greater magnetic permeability than the workpiece; running the workpiece to a target location with respect to a downhole structure; creating a magnetic pulse using an inductor, the layer facing the inductor; and urging the workpiece in a direction relative to a structure with the magnetic pulse.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
Movement of the workpiece 16 is adjustable. Such movement may be merely a positional change of the workpiece 16 without impacting another structure 18 (depicted in
As used herein, the term “pulse” relates to a magnetic field that is rapidly formed and will accelerate the workpiece 16 to a minimum velocity, wherein the term “pulse” itself is defined by its ability to cause the workpiece 16 to achieve the minimum velocity stated for an unspecified period of time. In one non-limiting embodiment, an excitation pulse frequency range is within +/−150% of the natural frequency of the workpiece 16 to be accelerated. Various actuations described herein are achievable using the pulse as defined for differing lengths of time such as installing a tool in the downhole environment, moving a portion of a tool (moving the workpiece), etc.
Generally applicable to all of the embodiments hereof, the pulse occurs pursuant to the use of the inductor 12 attached to the capacitor 14 that itself may be attached to a power source for recharging. Release of a workpiece-movement-inducing current (AC or DC) as the pulse defined above from the capacitor 14 (such as a capacitor bank) at a selected time generates a high-density magnetic field pulse that is coupled to the workpiece 16 placed in the vicinity thereof. An eddy current will consequently be produced in the workpiece 16 with a field orientation that opposes the current induced field hence providing a magnetic pressure that is capable of accelerating the workpiece 16 in a direction. Duration of a given pulse equates to distance of movement for a given system.
Embodiments of the workpiece 16 described herein further include a layer 20 that faces the inductor 12. The layer 20 is formed from a material having a different magnetic permeability than the magnetic permeability of a material in which the workpiece 16 is formed. In one embodiment, the magnetic permeability of the material of the layer 20 is higher than the magnetic permeability of the material of the workpiece 16 so that the combination of the layer 20 and the workpiece 16 embodies an increased magnetic permeability as compared to that of the workpiece 16 alone, to enhance the effectiveness of electromagnetic forming or welding. In some embodiments, the workpiece 16 may be formed of, but not limited to, steel or titanium while the layer 20 may be formed of, but not limited to, copper or aluminum. Also, in any of the embodiments described herein, the layer 20 may include a single material that differs in magnetic permeability as compared to that of the workpiece 16, or may alternatively include a plurality of different materials, having one or more materials that differ in magnetic permeability from each other as well as from the workpiece 16. For example, the layer 20 may include a first layered area formed of a first material and a second layered area formed of a second material, the second material having a different magnetic permeability than the first material. The layer 20 may be welded, bonded, or otherwise secured to a surface of the workpiece 16 that faces the inductor 12. The layer 20 may include, but is not limited to, a coating, a sleeve, an insert, or other selectively disposed layer. The layer 20 is disposed along a portion of the workpiece 16. In some embodiments, the layer may be bonded to the workpiece 16, such as when the layer is a coating which may be bonded to the workpiece throughout the span of the layer. In other embodiments, the layer 20 may be otherwise secured or retained to the workpiece 16, such as by a threaded connection or selective bonding through adhesive or tack welding. In some embodiments, the layer 20 may be separable from the workpiece but held in place through shoulders and other mechanical capturing features. In one embodiment, the surface of the workpiece 16 that faces the inductor 12 is formed with a pocket 17 to receive the layer 20. In the illustrated embodiment of
In one embodiment, the layer 20 enhances the overall magnetic permeability of the workpiece 16 by using a more conductive layer on the interior surface of the workpiece 16, which increases the efficiency of expanding the workpiece 16 using electromagnet pulses. When the workpiece 16, such as the illustrated tubular, is expanded using electromagnetic pulsing, the electromagnetic field only affects a small depth (known as the skin depth) of the workpiece 16. By coating, welding, or otherwise applying a more conductive material (such as aluminum) to the workpiece 16, the material (such as steel) of the workpiece 16 which has a lower conductivity, can be expanded out more efficiently than a workpiece 16 not having the layer 20. In general, the more electrically conductive the layer 20 is, the more efficient the process will be, and the magnetic pulse from the inductor 12 is more efficient in the workpiece 16 having the layer 20.
While one embodiment has been described wherein the magnetic permeability of the material of the layer 20 is higher than the magnetic permeability of the material of the workpiece 16, in another embodiment the magnetic permeability of the material of the layer 20 may be lower than the magnetic permeability of the material of the workpiece 16 so that the combination of the layer 20 and the workpiece 16 decreases the magnetic permeability of the combination, as compared to the workpiece 16 alone. Such an embodiment may be employed when it is desirable to form certain areas of the workpiece 16 with decreased effectiveness of electromagnetic forming or welding. By comparison, areas of the workpiece 16 exposed to the magnetic field produced by the inductor 12 that are not coated with the layer 20 (which has lower magnetic permeability) will have greater effectiveness of electromagnetic forming or welding.
In the embodiments illustrated in
For descriptive purposes only, the multi-thickness layer 120 is illustrated as having different sections 1 through 6, with section 4 having a layer thickness D substantially equal to the skin depth of the workpiece 16. Again for illustrative purposes only, section 1 includes a layer having a thickness less than the thickness D; section 2 includes a layer having a thickness less than the thickness D but greater than the thickness in section 1; section 3 includes a layer having a thickness less than the thickness D, less than the thickness in section 1, and less than the thickness in section 2; section 4 includes a layer having the thickness D greater than the thickness in section 1, greater than the thickness in section 2, and greater than the thickness in section 3; section 5 does not include any layer, and section 6 includes a layer having a thickness approximately the same as the thickness in section 1, less than the thickness in section 2, greater than the thickness in section 3, and less than the thickness D in section 4. Thus, it can be seen that the multi-thickness layer 120 includes more than one section having layer thicknesses of differing depths, one or more of which are less than the skin depth of the workpiece 16. Also, each section having a different thickness may have the same or have a different longitudinal length as compared to other sections of the layer 120. Furthermore, the transitions between different thicknesses may be gradual as illustrated, but may alternatively be immediate.
When exposed to a magnetic field produced by the inductor 12, the deformation of the resulting deformed workpiece 16′ will not be irregular and the extent of deformation will relatively follow the pattern of thicknesses of the multi-thickness layer 120. That is, when the section 4 has the greatest layer thickness within the multi-thickness layer 120 as shown, then the portion of the workpiece 16 carrying the section 4 of the layer 120 will correspondingly be deformed more than other portions of the workpiece 16. In the illustrated embodiment, the portions of the workpiece 16 corresponding to sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, will be deformed in varying amounts proportional to the varying layer thicknesses in the sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6.
The amount of deformation experienced by the portion of workpiece 16 associated with section 5 depends on whether or not a coil 22 of the inductor 12 is provided adjacent the section 5. If one continuous coil is provided as shown in
As indicated in
In yet another embodiment, multiple coils 22 in each section of the inductor 12 may be connected in parallel to enable the multi-thickness layer 120 to function based on conductivity. When the coils 22 are connected in parallel, even when provided with the same voltage, the current is different, and current is what drives the magnetic pressure in the parallel circuit. The different layer sections may have different electrical natural frequencies, which may require alterations of the frequency of the overall circuit. Each section would respond differentially based upon its own natural frequency and the circuit can be adjusted to match. That is, even if all the coils 22 are connected to the same energy source, the energy can be delivered to only activate those coils 22 for which their natural frequency are closest to the excitation frequency. Thus, a conductive change can be used to cause a different effect on the workpiece 16, even for a layer 20 having a uniform layer thickness, as shown in
The chosen circuit design of the coils 22, whether in series or in parallel, can be based on what is selected to drive the change in the workpiece, whether it is conductivity or magnetic permeability. The workpiece having the multi-thickness layer 120 will receive a differential load on each section having variable thickness even if a single coil 22 is used for all the sections of the multi-thickness layer 120, but the differential loading is enhanced/calibrated when the inductor 12 utilizes multiple coils 22 as described above.
Turning now to
The coil(s) 22 of the inductor 12, for the embodiments of the workpiece 16 having the layer 20 and 120, are helically wrapped around the circumference of the mandrel 24, such that the coils 22 form a substantially tubular shape which shares the longitudinal axis 8 of the mandrel 24. While such coils 22 could also be employed to produce a magnetic field to move the workpiece 16 shown in
In the above-described embodiments, current flows circumferentially around the mandrel 24, with the resultant current affecting the workpiece 16. In an alternate embodiment shown in
The magnetic pulse actuation arrangement 10 having the layer 20 or multi-thickness layer 120 or 220 finds particular use in the oil field, downhole environment. In addition to the deformation of a workpiece 16, such as an inner tubular, into an outer structure 18, such as a casing, the magnetic pulse actuation arrangement 10 may be utilized in other applications. In different embodiments described herein, movement of the workpiece 16 as a result of the magnetic pulse may be in a directly radial direction whether inwardly or outwardly or movement may be directed axially or in any other direction selected and in which direction the pulse may be directed. As shown in the depiction of
Referring to
Thus, some embodiments described herein employ a high permeability material layer 20, 120, 120, which may be disposed on the workpiece, such as welded or bonded to a surface (such as the outside or inside of a tubular body) of the workpiece (a tool) to increase the magnetic permeability of the base tubular to enhance the effectiveness of electromagnetic forming or welding. The layer material, or another material 27, can also be used to enhance the weld itself by using a material that is easier to weld on the outside of the tubular. The overall magnetic permeability of a tubular can be changed and/or enhanced by using a more conductive layer 20, 120, 220 on the OD or ID of the tubular. This increases the efficiency of expanding or compressing it using electromagnet pulses. When a tubular is expanded using electromagnetic pulsing, the electromagnetic field only affects a small depth (known as skin depth) of the tubular. By coating or welding a more conductive material (such as aluminum) to the depth of the skin depth or greater of a workpiece material (such as steel) which has a lower conductivity, can be expanded out at a much faster and efficient rate than steel alone. In general, the more electrically conductive the material is, the more efficient the process will be. The layer can be applied to the OD to enhance the compressibility. The layer 27 could also be applied to enhance the weldability of the material. Another alternate method would be to apply the layer at different thicknesses and/or different materials having different magnetic permeabilities. This enables a field shaping effect which changes and/or intensifies the magnetic field in varying degrees depending on the thicknesses of the layer. Another alternate method is to create different layers and thicknesses of layers to control the magnetic field which controls the location, speed, and effect of the radial expansion. If a thicker piece of layer (having greater magnetic permeability) is utilized, the pressure will be increased in response to the magnetic pulse. The thicker layer is also more electrically conductive than the workpiece, so the pressure will increase because the current will also increase. This creates selective deformation patterns because the workpiece will become more deformed where you have more pressure.
Use of the layered magnetic pulse actuation arrangement reduces the amount of energy needed to be carried downhole to move a workpiece/tool towards another structure, such as expanding a tubular into a parent casing. Use of the different layer thicknesses/layers to control the magnetic fields also eliminates the need to run a field shaper downhole with the EM coil on the running string, which results in fewer parts to build, maintain, and carry downhole.
Set forth below are some embodiments of the foregoing disclosure:
A magnetic pulse actuation arrangement configured for use in a downhole system, the arrangement including: a workpiece; a layer placed along a portion of the workpiece, the layer having a different magnetic permeability than the workpiece; and, an inductor including a coil and configured to deliver a magnetic pulse to the workpiece to urge the workpiece in a direction, the layer facing the coil.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer has a greater magnetic permeability than a magnetic permeability of the workpiece.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer has a different conductivity than a conductivity of the workpiece.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer is on one of an interior surface or exterior surface of the workpiece, and the other of the interior surface or exterior surface of the workpiece is configured to be urged toward a structure in response to the magnetic pulse.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer has a variable thickness including a first thickness and a second thickness different than the first thickness.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein a first layered area having the first thickness is formed of a first material and a second layered area having the second thickness is formed of a second material, the second material having a different magnetic permeability than the first material.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the workpiece has a longitudinal axis, and a section of the layer having the first thickness is longitudinally displaced from a section of the layer having the second thickness.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein a section of the layer having the first thickness is circumferentially displaced from a section of the layer having the second thickness.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the coil is a first coil arranged adjacent to a section of the layer having the first thickness, and further comprising a second coil arranged adjacent to a section of the layer having the second thickness.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the first and second coils are connected in series or in parallel.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the first and second coils are wrapped around a mandrel.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the first and second coils are wrapped longitudinally with respect to an axis of a mandrel.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the coil is a first coil arranged adjacent to a first section of the layer, and further comprising a second coil arranged adjacent to a second section of the layer, wherein the coils are electrically connected and separated by a gap.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the coil is a first coil arranged adjacent to the layer, and further comprising a second coil arranged adjacent to a non-layered portion of the workpiece.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer has a uniform thickness.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, further comprising a plug or brush configured to form a closed loop circuit with the layer and complete an axial current flow of the layer.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the workpiece is a downhole tubular and further comprising an inner or outer tubular positioned interiorly or exteriorly of the downhole tubular, the downhole tubular urged towards the inner or outer tubular in response to the magnetic pulse.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer is a first layer, and further comprising a second layer disposed on a portion of the workpiece configured to contact a structure, the second layer formed of a material to enhance a bond between the structure and the workpiece.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer includes a first layered area formed of a first material and a second layered area formed of a second material, the second material having a different magnetic permeability than the first material.
The arrangement as in any prior embodiment or combination of embodiments, wherein the layer is a coating.
A method of installing a workpiece in a downhole system, the method including: selectively applying a layer to a portion of the workpiece, the layer having a greater magnetic permeability than the workpiece; running the workpiece to a target location with respect to a downhole structure; creating a magnetic pulse using an inductor, the layer facing the inductor; and urging the workpiece in a direction relative to a structure with the magnetic pulse.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Further, it should further be noted that the terms “first,” “second,” and the like herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity).
The teachings of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of well operations. These operations may involve using one or more treatment agents to treat a formation, the fluids resident in a formation, a wellbore, and/or equipment in the wellbore, such as production tubing. The treatment agents may be in the form of liquids, gases, solids, semi-solids, and mixtures thereof. Illustrative treatment agents include, but are not limited to, fracturing fluids, acids, steam, water, brine, anti-corrosion agents, cement, permeability modifiers, drilling muds, emulsifiers, demulsifiers, tracers, flow improvers etc. Illustrative well operations include, but are not limited to, hydraulic fracturing, stimulation, tracer injection, cleaning, acidizing, steam injection, water flooding, cementing, etc.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3810372 | Queyroix | May 1974 | A |
4255975 | Debreuille | Mar 1981 | A |
4619127 | Sano et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4825954 | Baugh | May 1989 | A |
5030873 | Owen | Jul 1991 | A |
5188177 | Curry | Feb 1993 | A |
5826320 | Rathke et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5955934 | Raj | Sep 1999 | A |
6474534 | Gabbianelli et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
7199480 | Fripp | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7301429 | Hall et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
8662169 | Cortez | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9476277 | Stamatakis | Oct 2016 | B2 |
10227860 | McMullen | Mar 2019 | B1 |
20040079524 | Bass et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084381 | Korenev | May 2004 | A1 |
20040084442 | Larovere | May 2004 | A1 |
20040263004 | Krokoszinski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050097934 | Park | May 2005 | A1 |
20060081684 | Moore | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060131300 | Yablochnikov | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080061789 | Coates et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090085701 | Veneruso et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090166045 | Wetzel | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100000742 | Bonner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20120169334 | Hopper et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140238662 | Prieto | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140239957 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140328139 | Minto | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150159475 | Prieto et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150308228 | Vick, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150328712 | Grubb | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160040506 | Goodman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160097268 | Okoniewski et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160175980 | Golovashchenko et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170266752 | Apel et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180038972 | Gresillon | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180043463 | Prieto et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180045006 | Prieto | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180045007 | Prieto | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080296 | Prieto | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180188413 | Capoglu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1383605 | Feb 1974 | GB |
101529700 | Jun 2015 | KR |
0181021 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2007132468 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2010135492 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Arumugam, et al.; “Experimental Study of Electromagnetic Sheet Metal Forming Process”, 12th Global Congress on Manufacutring & Management, Procedia Engineering 97 (2014) pp. 277-290; 14 pages total. |
Bay, et al.; “Electromagnetic forming processes: material behaviour and computational modelling”; 11th International Conference on Technology, Nagoya, Japan; Procedia Engineering 81 (2014) 793-800, 8 pages total. |
Buckley “An introduction to Eddy Current Testing theory and technology” technical paper eddyc.pdf available from the internet at http://joe.buckley.net/papers; Sep. 8 2003 (pp. 1-7). |
Gayakwad, et al.; “A Review on Electromagnetic Forming Process”; 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation; Procedia Materials Science 6 (2014) 520-527, 8 pages total. |
Kinsey, et al. “Electromagnetic forming and Joining of Dissimilar Materials”; I/URC for Metal Deformatin Processes Planning Meeting, Evanston, IL; Mar. 14-15, 2017; 10 pages. |
Miranda et al. “Magnetic pulse welding on the cutting edge of industrial applications.” Soldagem & Inspeçã 19.1 (2014): 69-81. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2017/046289; dated Nov. 20, 2017 (pp. 1-9). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2017/046296; dated Nov. 22, 2017; 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2017/046298; dated Nov. 22, 2017; 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2017/047507; dated Oct. 31, 2017; 8 pages. |
Otin, et al., “A Frequency Domain Approach for Computing the Lorentz Force in Electromagnetic Metal Forming”; International Center for Numerical Methods in Enginnering; 2004-2007; 50 pages. |
Otin, et al., “Electromagnetic Metal Forming”; CIMNE—International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain; Jul. 2011; 37 pages. |
Popovic, et al. Introductory Electromagnetics; Chapter 20—Skin Effects, p. 382-392; Prentice Hall (2000). |
Psyk, et al., “Electromagnetic forming—A review”; Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (2011) pp. 787-829. |
Psyk, et al.; “Process Model and Design for Magnetic Pulse Welding by Tube Expansion”; 5th Internatational Conference on High Speed Forming, 2012; 10 pages. |
Senthilnathan, et al.; “A two stage finite element analysis of electromagnetic forming of perforated aluminium sheet metals”; 12th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management; Procedia Engineering 97 (2014) 1135-1144; 10 pages total. |
Yu “Effects of current frequency on electromagnetic tube compression”; Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Jan. 2009; 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190249522 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |