The subject matter described herein relates to systems, methods and computer software for magnetic resonance imaging and various diagnostic and interventional applications associated therewith.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, is a noninvasive imaging technique that uses the interaction between radio frequency pulses, a strong magnetic field (modified with weak gradient fields applied across it to localize and encode or decode phases and frequencies) and body tissue to obtain projections, spectral signals, and images of planes or volumes from within a patient's body. Magnetic resonance imaging is particularly helpful in the imaging of soft tissues and may be used for the diagnosis of disease. Real-time or cine MRI may be used for the diagnosis of medical conditions requiring the imaging of moving structures within a patient. Real-time MRI may also be used in conjunction with interventional procedures, such as radiation therapy or image guided surgery, and also in planning for such procedures.
Magnetic resonance imaging systems, methods and software are disclosed. Some implementations may be used in conjunction with a main magnet having a low field strength, a gradient coil assembly, an RF coil system, and a control system configured for the acquisition and processing of magnetic resonance imaging data from a human patient while utilizing a sparse sampling imaging technique without parallel imaging.
In some variations, the field strength of the main magnet is less than 1.0 Tesla and in others the field strength is approximately 0.35 T.
In some implementations, the control system of the MRI may be configured to utilize low gradient field strengths (e.g., below 20 mT/m), to utilize large flip angles (e.g., greater than 40 degrees), to utilize RF bandwidths to maintain chemical shift and magnetic susceptibility artifacts to less than one millimeter (e.g., RF bandwidths less than 1800 Hz), to utilize a gradient slew rate above 75 mT/m/ms, and/or to employ pulse sequences that do not require dephasing or spoiler pulses. In some implementations, the RF coil system may not include a surface coil.
The control system of the magnetic resonance imaging system may also be configured to produce cine MRI (e.g., of least 4 frames per second).
In another implementation, the magnetic resonance imaging system may be integrated with a radiation therapy device for radiation treatment of a human patient and the control system may be further configured to utilize cine MRI to track the locations of tissues in the human patient. The radiation therapy device may be a linear accelerator having an energy in the range of, for example, 4-6 MV. The radiation therapy device may also be a proton therapy system, heavy ion therapy system, or a radioisotope therapy system.
The magnetic resonance imaging system may also comprise a split/open bore magnet and be configured to allow for surgical intervention in the gap of the split magnet, for example, with a robotic surgical device integrated into the system. Similarly, the gradient coil assembly may be a split gradient coil assembly. The main magnet may be a superconducting magnet, a non-superconducting magnet, or a resistive magnet. The main magnet may be powered by a battery system.
Implementations of the current subject matter can include, but are not limited to, methods consistent with the descriptions provided herein as well as articles and computer program products that comprise a tangibly embodied machine-readable medium operable to cause one or more machines (e.g., computers, etc.) to result in operations implementing one or more of the described features. Similarly, computer systems are also contemplated that may include one or more processors and one or more memories coupled to the one or more processors. A memory, which can include a computer-readable storage medium, may include, encode, store, or the like, one or more programs that cause one or more processors to perform one or more of the operations described herein. Computer implemented methods consistent with one or more implementations of the current subject matter can be implemented by one or more data processors residing in a single computing system or across multiple computing systems. Such multiple computing systems can be connected and can exchange data and/or commands or other instructions or the like via one or more connections, including but not limited to a connection over a network (e.g., the internet, a wireless wide area network, a local area network, a wide area network, a wired network, or the like), via a direct connection between one or more of the multiple computing systems, etc.
The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims. While certain features of the currently disclosed subject matter are described for illustrative purposes in relation to particular implementations, it should be readily understood that such features are not intended to be limiting. The claims that follow this disclosure are intended to define the scope of the protected subject matter.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein and, together with the description, help explain some of the principles associated with the disclosed implementations. In the drawings,
The present disclosure describes systems, methods and computer software allowing for, among other things, high-quality magnetic resonance imaging with limited magnetic susceptibility distortions and chemical shift artifacts resulting in submillimeter spatial accuracy, high frame rate cine capability with an appropriate specific absorption rate (SAR), and the ability to support real-time 2-D and volumetric MRI-guided diagnostic and interventional applications.
The main magnet 102 of MRI 100 may be a cylindrical split or open bore magnet separated by buttresses 114, with a gap 116 as shown in
Gradient coil assembly 104 contains the coils necessary to add small varying magnetic fields on top of main magnet 102's field to allow for spatial encoding of the imaging data. Gradient coil assembly 104 may be a continuous cylindrical assembly, a split gradient coil assembly as shown in
RF coil system 106 is responsible for exciting the spins of hydrogen protons within patient 110 and for receiving subsequent signals emitted from patient 110. RF coil system 106 thus includes an RF transmitter portion and an RF receive portion. The implementation in
Control system 112 is configured for the acquisition and processing of magnetic resonance imaging data from patient 110, including image reconstruction. Control system 112 may contain numerous subsystems, for example, those which control operation of the gradient coil assembly 104, the RF coil system 106, portions of those systems themselves, and those that process data received from RF coil system 106 and perform image reconstruction.
In one advantageous implementation, control system 112 is configured to utilize a sparse sampling imaging technique without parallel imaging. When the term sparse sampling imaging technique is used herein it refers to image acquisition and reconstruction techniques where only a portion of frequency space is measured (for the purposes of the present disclosure, 50% or less of the frequency information used to reconstruct an image using standard back-projection methods), and the image reconstruction is performed by optimization of the reconstructed image to be consistent with a priori knowledge of the imaged subject while also generally satisfying consistency between the frequency information of the reconstructed image and the measured frequency information. Sparse sampling imaging techniques thus include techniques such as compressed sensing and the volumetric imaging technique disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 62/353,530, filed concurrently herewith and assigned to ViewRay Technologies, Inc.
Parallel imaging techniques are commonly used in magnetic resonance imaging, especially with cine MRI, to shorten the time required for data acquisition. Parallel imaging methods use knowledge of the spatial distribution of signals received by multiple RF detectors (such as a surface coil having an array of these “elements”) to replace some of the time-consuming phase-encoding steps in the MRI process. In this manner, signal is received from multiple coil elements “in parallel,” and the sampling of fewer portions in k-space along readout trajectories (i.e., fewer phase encodings) is compensated for by the duplicity of data from all coil elements.
However, certain implementations of the present disclosure contemplate data acquisition and processing without utilizing parallel imaging techniques. In such cases where the present disclosure refers to magnetic resonance data acquisition and processing “without parallel imaging” it contemplates systems, methods and computer software designed to incorporate a small amount parallel imaging (perhaps in an attempt to avoid infringement), but not enough to create a perceptively significant increase in signal-to-noise ratio, all other things being constant.
In some advantageous implementations, the MRI and control system 112 may be configured to utilize low gradient field strengths, for example below 20 mT/m or, in other cases, below 12 mT/m. In addition, some advantageous implementations may utilize a relatively high gradient slew rate or rise time, such as a slew rate above 75 mT/m/ms. Control system 112 may also be advantageously configured to utilize large flip angles, for example, greater than 40 degrees. In addition, control system 112 may be advantageously configured to employ pulse sequences that do not require dephasing pulses (it is contemplated that such pulse sequences have no dephasing pulses, or have only a small number of dephasing or spoiling pulses such that there is no significant increase in data acquisition time from the standpoint of patient throughput).
In some implementations, control system 112 may be configured to utilize RF bandwidths to maintain chemical shift and magnetic susceptibility artifacts below one millimeter or even below one half of a millimeter. As an example, control system 112 may be configured for an RF bandwidth less than 1800 Hz. An evaluation of potential worst-case artifacts due to magnetic susceptibility and chemical shift can be evaluated. For example, for a worst case of, e.g., 8 ppm perturbation observed in human susceptibility assessments, formula [1] below can be used to estimate magnetic susceptibility artifacts.
Here δms [mm] is the spatial distortion in millimeters due to magnetic susceptibility artifacts due to a magnetic susceptibility induced magnetic field change, mag. suscept. [ppm] in parts per million of the main magnetic field strength, Bo [T], in Tesla, and where Ge [T/mm] is the gradient encoding strength in Tesla per millimeter.
And, formula [2] below may be used to estimate displacements due to chemical shift.
Here δcs [mm] is the spatial distortion in millimeters due to chemical shift artifacts, where 3.5 [ppm] is the relative parts per million difference in the Larmour frequency for Hydrogen bound to Oxygen (H—O) versus Carbon (C—H) for a Pixel or Voxel size, PixelSize, in millimeters, and fBo is the Larmour frequency for Hydrogen in water and BW[Hz/pixel] is the frequency bandwidth for a pixel or voxel in Hertz per pixel or voxel.
A worst-case distortion can be taken as the sum of these two distortions plus any residual distortions due to uncorrected gradient field nonlinearities.
In one particular implementation of the magnetic resonance imaging system 100 of the present disclosure, the main magnet 102 field strength is approximately 0.35 Tesla and control system 112 is configured to utilize gradient field strengths below 12 mT/m, a gradient slew rate above 75 mT/m/ms, flip angles greater than 40 degrees, RF bandwidths less than 1800 Hz and pulse sequences that do not contain dephasing pulses. Control system 112 may also be configured to utilize a sparse sampling imaging technique without parallel imaging.
In another implementation of magnetic resonance imaging system 100, the main magnet 102 field strength is approximately 0.15 Tesla and control system 112 is configured to utilize gradient field strengths below 10 mT/m, a gradient slew rate above 75 mT/m/ms, flip angles greater than 60 degrees, RF bandwidths less than 1000 Hz and pulse sequences that do not contain dephasing pulses. In this implementation, control system 112 may also be configured to utilize a sparse sampling imaging technique without parallel imaging.
As discussed further herein, certain implementations of the systems, methods and computer software of present disclosure can be beneficial for cine planar, cine multi-planar, or real time volumetric or “4-D” (3-D spatial plus the time dimension) magnetic resonance imaging. Control system 112 may thus be configured to acquire and process data as necessary to reconstruct images to create cine MRI, for example, enabling cine MRI of at least 4 frames per second while maintaining an acceptable specific absorption rate in patient 110.
Conventional wisdom is that a high main magnet field strength is always preferred due to higher signal-to-noise ratio, with the desired field strength being limited mainly by size and cost considerations. Through higher signal-to-noise, contrast, and resolution, a higher field strength typically facilitates an improved ability for physicians to make diagnoses based on the resulting images. Yet, implementations of the present disclosure utilizing low main magnet field strengths (e.g., below 1.0 Tesla) result in high quality images and provide a number of additional benefits.
For example, implementations of the present disclosure can include RF bandwidths less than 1800 Hz, resulting in decreased chemical shift artifacts (i.e., where hydrogen atoms in different chemical environments such as water and fat are partially shielded from the main magnetic field due to the difference in sharing of electrons involved in O—H and C—H chemical bonds, and hence have different nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts, appearing in different spatial locations when locating signals with frequency encoding). While high field systems will exhibit significant chemical shift artifacts, and require higher RF bandwidths (and their accompanying lower signal-to-noise ratios), the low field systems disclosed herein can use lower RF bandwidths and maintain high spatial integrity.
In addition, high main magnetic field strength systems will exhibit significant magnetic susceptibility artifacts where the diamagnetic and paramagnetic (and in rare cases ferromagnetic) nature of the imaged subject perturbs the magnetic field, leading to spatially distorted images. Such issues in higher field systems might typically be addressed through an increase in gradient field strengths, but implementations of the present disclosure avoid the same level of artifacts and thus may utilize lower gradient field strengths, resulting in improved signal-to-noise ratio and a lower specific absorption rate.
Moreover, the systems, methods and software discussed herein can be implemented without parallel imaging, which would cause a decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting images that would increase with the speed of the imaging. Instead, the sparse sampling techniques disclosed herein allow for high frame rate acquisition with a relatively high signal-to-noise ratio that does not significantly decrease with image acquisition speed, for example, through the use of a priori data acquired before scanning, avoiding the use of “gridded” k-space data, and applying iterative optimization techniques. The use of phased array receive coils may also be avoided in the absence of parallel imaging, thereby achieving high quality imaging with less complex technology. Fewer RF receive channels may be used, in fact, only a single RF receive channel may be employed, along with a less expensive spectrometer.
Certain implementations of the present disclosure can also be employed without surface coils in contact with the patient. Instead, imaging may be performed with merely a body coil integrated into the bore of the MRI that contains both the transmit and receive coils.
In addition, simultaneous multiple slice imaging techniques may be beneficially employed, where multiple imaging slices or sub-volumes may be simultaneously excited and simultaneously read out. One implementation of simultaneous multiple slice excitation can sum multiple RF waveforms with different phase modulation functions resulting in a multiband pulse that can excite desired slices in the presence of a common slice selective gradient.
Furthermore, implementations of the present disclosure may utilize relatively high flip angles, which, at higher main magnet field strengths, would cause excessive patient heating. The higher flip angles in implementations of the present disclosure will result in improved image contrast and signal-to-noise ratios.
Additionally, the low main magnet field strength implementations discussed herein will exhibit faster RF signal decay, allowing for pulse sequences that do not require dephasing pulses (with the attendant advantage of a lower specific absorption rate).
The low main magnet field strength of certain implementations of the present disclosure also allows for lower frequency RF excitation pulses and thus decreased heating of the patient tissues by those pulses.
Further still, the well-controlled specific absorption rates exhibited by implementations of the present disclosure provide the ability to acquire and process data at a speed sufficient for high frame rate cine MRI.
With the numerous above described advantages, implementations of the present disclosure are well-suited for high quality cine MRI having an acceptable patient specific absorption rate. These implementations also control magnetic susceptibility and chemical shift artifacts so as to provide high spatial integrity, which can be critical in certain diagnostic and interventional applications.
Implementations of the present disclosure can be beneficial in numerous applications for diagnostic cine MRI, examples include anatomic localizers, repeated rapid imaging for localization and the study of movement (e.g., phonation), imaging freely moving subjects (e.g., fetal MRI), cardiac imaging, and the like.
Implementations of the present disclosure can also be beneficial in interventional applications, which also benefit from the advantages of high spatial integrity and controlled specific absorption rate. Examples of interventional applications include angioplasty, stent delivery, thrombolysis, aneurysm repair, vertebroplasty, fibroid embolization, and many other applications where fluoroscopy is currently used (and where the use of cine MRI will decrease radiation dose to the patient).
Implementations of the present disclosure may also be used for image guided surgery, and may provide real-time intraprocedural guidance in multiple orthogonal planes, imaging feedback regarding instrument position, guidance and/or warning systems and the like. An open bore MRI implementation, similar to that depicted in
Yet another advantage of the low field strength attendant to certain implementations of the present disclosure is the decreased magnetic forces that will be exerted on any interventional equipment employed in conjunction with MRI 100 such as robotic surgery equipment, biopsy instrumentation, cryogenic ablation units, brachytherapy equipment, radiation therapy equipment, and the like.
In one implementation of magnetic resonance imaging system 100, in combination with interventional equipment (e.g., radiation therapy equipment such as a linac), a low field strength, non-superconducting magnet is utilized, for example, a resistive magnet, a permanent magnet, or hybrid magnet.
Another beneficial application of certain implementations of the present disclosure is in the field of image guided radiotherapy. Radiotherapy applications will also benefit from the present disclosure's ability to provide high frame rate cine MRI with high spatial integrity, both of which are key to accurately tracking a target being treated and to avoid hitting patient critical structures with significant amounts of ionizing radiation.
As noted above, control system 112 of magnetic resonance imaging system 100 may be configured for cine MRI and further configured to utilize cine MRI to track the locations of tissues in the human patient 110.
An additional benefit of implementations of the present disclosure utilizing a main magnet 102 with a low field strength is a decrease in distortions of the delivered ionizing radiation dose distribution in patient 110 caused by the magnetic Lorenz force acting on the transport of secondary electrons (and positrons). The Lorenz force exerted by a higher field main magnet would overpower the scattering power of the electrons (and positrons), and cause them to spiral off their natural course, trapping them at low density interfaces—potentially resulting in unintended and harmful dose concentrations in the patient.
An exemplary method for real-time image guided radiotherapy, consistent with implementations of the present disclosure, is illustrated in
When the present disclosure indicates that the magnetic resonance imaging system is configured to operate in a particular manner, it means that such system is setup and intended to be operated in that manner, regardless of whether it may also be configured to utilize pulse sequence(s) or configurations that do not operate in the manner described or claimed herein.
The present disclosure contemplates that the calculations disclosed in the embodiments herein may be performed in a number of ways, applying the same concepts taught herein, and that such calculations are equivalent to the embodiments disclosed.
One or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, specially designed application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. These various aspects or features can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. The programmable system or computing system may include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
These computer programs, which can also be referred to programs, software, software applications, applications, components, or code, include machine instructions for a programmable processor, and can be implemented in a high-level procedural language, an object-oriented programming language, a functional programming language, a logical programming language, and/or in assembly/machine language. As used herein, the term “machine-readable medium” (or “computer readable medium”) refers to any computer program product, apparatus and/or device, such as for example magnetic discs, optical disks, memory, and Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs), used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as a machine-readable signal. The term “machine-readable signal” (or “computer readable signal”) refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor. The machine-readable medium can store such machine instructions non-transitorily, such as for example as would a non-transient solid-state memory or a magnetic hard drive or any equivalent storage medium. The machine-readable medium can alternatively or additionally store such machine instructions in a transient manner, such as for example as would a processor cache or other random access memory associated with one or more physical processor cores.
To provide for interaction with a user, one or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be implemented on a computer having a display device, such as for example a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a light emitting diode (LED) monitor for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, such as for example a mouse or a trackball, by which the user may provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well. For example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, such as for example visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user may be received in any form, including, but not limited to, acoustic, speech, or tactile input. Other possible input devices include, but are not limited to, touch screens or other touch-sensitive devices such as single or multi-point resistive or capacitive trackpads, voice recognition hardware and software, optical scanners, optical pointers, digital image capture devices and associated interpretation software, and the like.
In the descriptions above and in the claims, phrases such as “at least one of” or “one or more of” may occur followed by a conjunctive list of elements or features. The term “and/or” may also occur in a list of two or more elements or features. Unless otherwise implicitly or explicitly contradicted by the context in which it used, such a phrase is intended to mean any of the listed elements or features individually or any of the recited elements or features in combination with any of the other recited elements or features. For example, the phrases “at least one of A and B;” “one or more of A and B;” and “A and/or B” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, or A and B together.” A similar interpretation is also intended for lists including three or more items. For example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C;” “one or more of A, B, and C;” and “A, B, and/or C” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A and B and C together.” Use of the term “based on,” above and in the claims is intended to mean, “based at least in part on,” such that an unrecited feature or element is also permissible.
The subject matter described herein can be embodied in systems, apparatus, methods, computer programs and/or articles depending on the desired configuration. Any methods or the logic flows depicted in the accompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. The implementations set forth in the foregoing description do not represent all implementations consistent with the subject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examples consistent with aspects related to the described subject matter. Although a few variations have been described in detail above, other modifications or additions are possible. In particular, further features and/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein. The implementations described above can be directed to various combinations and subcombinations of the disclosed features and/or combinations and subcombinations of further features noted above. Furthermore, above described advantages are not intended to limit the application of any issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the advantages.
Additionally, section headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically, and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” such claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called technical field. Further, the description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference to this disclosure in general or use of the word “invention” in the singular is not intended to imply any limitation on the scope of the claims set forth below. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/630,890, filed Jun. 22, 2017, entitled “MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING,” which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/353,538, filed Jun. 22, 2016, entitled “MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING,” the disclosures of each are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4612596 | Fox | Sep 1986 | A |
4694837 | Blakeley | Sep 1987 | A |
4766378 | Danby | Aug 1988 | A |
5216255 | Weidlich | Jun 1993 | A |
5317616 | Swerdloff | May 1994 | A |
5332908 | Weidlich | Jul 1994 | A |
5351280 | Swerdloff | Sep 1994 | A |
5373844 | Smith | Dec 1994 | A |
5412363 | Breneman | May 1995 | A |
5442675 | Swerdloff | Aug 1995 | A |
5458125 | Schweikard | Oct 1995 | A |
5513238 | Leber | Apr 1996 | A |
5537452 | Shepherd | Jul 1996 | A |
5538494 | Matsuda | Jul 1996 | A |
5555283 | Shiu | Sep 1996 | A |
5570022 | Ehnholm | Oct 1996 | A |
5596619 | Carol | Jan 1997 | A |
5602892 | Llacer | Feb 1997 | A |
5602982 | Llacer | Feb 1997 | A |
5659281 | Pissanetzky | Aug 1997 | A |
5708362 | Frese | Jan 1998 | A |
5724400 | Swerdloff | Mar 1998 | A |
5734384 | Yanof | Mar 1998 | A |
5740225 | Nabatame | Apr 1998 | A |
5748700 | Shepherd | May 1998 | A |
5751781 | Brown | May 1998 | A |
5757881 | Hughes | May 1998 | A |
5802136 | Carol | Sep 1998 | A |
5815547 | Shepherd | Sep 1998 | A |
5851182 | Sahadevan | Dec 1998 | A |
5894503 | Shepherd | Apr 1999 | A |
5936502 | Englund | Aug 1999 | A |
6005916 | Johnson | Dec 1999 | A |
6011393 | Kaufman | Jan 2000 | A |
6038283 | Carol | Mar 2000 | A |
6052430 | Siochi | Apr 2000 | A |
6104779 | Shepherd | Aug 2000 | A |
6112112 | Gilhuijs | Aug 2000 | A |
6144875 | Schweikard | Nov 2000 | A |
6175761 | Frandsen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198957 | Green | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223067 | Vilsmeier | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240162 | Hernandez-Guerra | May 2001 | B1 |
6260005 | Yang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6314159 | Siochi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320377 | Miyazaki | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330300 | Siochi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349129 | Siochi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366798 | Green | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6381486 | Mistretta | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385286 | Fitchard | May 2002 | B1 |
6385477 | Werner | May 2002 | B1 |
6393096 | Carol | May 2002 | B1 |
6411675 | Llacer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414487 | Anand | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6414490 | Damadian | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422748 | Shepherd | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424856 | Vilsmeier | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466813 | Shukla | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487435 | Mistretta | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6504899 | Pugachev | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512813 | Krispel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516046 | Frohlich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526123 | Ein-Gal | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527443 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542767 | McNichols | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546073 | Lee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560311 | Shepard | May 2003 | B1 |
6564084 | Allred | May 2003 | B2 |
6570475 | Lvovsky | May 2003 | B1 |
6584174 | Schubert | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594516 | Steckner | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600810 | Hughes | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609022 | Vilsmeier | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611700 | Vilsmeier | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618467 | Ruchala | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636645 | Yu | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657391 | Ding | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661870 | Kapatoes | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6708054 | Shukla | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719683 | Frohlich | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724922 | Vilsmeier | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728336 | Bortfeld | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731970 | Schlossbauer | May 2004 | B2 |
6735277 | McNutt | May 2004 | B2 |
6757355 | Siochi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772002 | Schmidt | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778850 | Adler | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792074 | Erbel | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6849129 | Bilz et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853704 | Collins | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859660 | Vilsmeier | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862469 | Bucholz | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865253 | Blumhofer | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865411 | Erbel | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879714 | Hutter | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885886 | Bauch | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891375 | Goto | May 2005 | B2 |
6898456 | Erbel | May 2005 | B2 |
6915005 | Ruchala | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6937696 | Mostafavi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947582 | Vilsmeier | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6965847 | Wessol | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980679 | Jeung | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999555 | Morf | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012385 | Kulish | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7046762 | Lee | May 2006 | B2 |
7046765 | Wong | May 2006 | B2 |
7046831 | Ruchala | May 2006 | B2 |
7050845 | Vilsmeier | May 2006 | B2 |
7092573 | Luo | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095823 | Topolnjak | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096055 | Schweikard | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7123758 | Jeung | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130372 | Kusch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7154991 | Earnst | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162005 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166852 | Saracen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171257 | Thomson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180366 | Roos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191100 | Mostafavi | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202663 | Huang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204640 | Fu | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221733 | Takai | May 2007 | B1 |
7227925 | Mansfield | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7230429 | Huang | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7231075 | Raghavan | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231076 | Fu | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260426 | Schweikard | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265545 | Krueger | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7266175 | Romesberg | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7266176 | Allison | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289599 | Seppi | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298819 | Dooley | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302038 | Mackie | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308298 | Miyazaki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315636 | Kuduvalli | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317782 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7318805 | Schweikard | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324626 | Vilsmeier | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327865 | Fu | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7366278 | Fu | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7394081 | Okazaki | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403638 | Jeung | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412029 | Myles | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415095 | Wofford | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417434 | Overweg | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423273 | Clayton | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426318 | Fu | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444178 | Goldbach | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7460637 | Clinthorne | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463823 | Birkenbach | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471813 | Ulmer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477776 | Lachner | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480399 | Fu | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486839 | Moriguchi | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505037 | Wang | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505617 | Fu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522779 | Fu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7532705 | Yin | May 2009 | B2 |
7542622 | Angelini | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7558617 | Vilsmeier | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570987 | Raabe | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577474 | Vilsmeier | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7589326 | Mollov | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7634122 | Bertram | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636417 | Bjorkholm | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638752 | Partain | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657304 | Mansfield | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7659718 | Lustig | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7688998 | Tuma | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7728311 | Gall | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741624 | Sahadevan | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7785358 | Lach | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791338 | Kim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840045 | Guo | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7902530 | Sahadevan | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7907987 | Dempsey | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7957507 | Cadman | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8139714 | Sahadevan | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8155417 | Piron | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190233 | Dempsey | May 2012 | B2 |
8214010 | Courtney | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8310233 | Trzasko | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331531 | Fahrig | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8460195 | Courtney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8803524 | Dempsey | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8836332 | Shvartsman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8983573 | Carlone | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9114253 | Dempsey | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9289626 | Kawrakow | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9421398 | Shvartsman | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9423477 | Dempsey | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9446263 | Dempsey | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9472000 | Dempsey | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9526918 | Kruip | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9638773 | Poole | May 2017 | B2 |
10026186 | Gerganov | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10613171 | Li | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10650532 | Gerganov | May 2020 | B2 |
11378629 | Dempsey | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20010001807 | Green | May 2001 | A1 |
20010049475 | Bucholz | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020046010 | Wessol | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020091315 | Spetz | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020150207 | Kapatoes | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030068097 | Wilson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030155530 | Adnani | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181804 | Gagnon | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030219098 | McNutt | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040054248 | Kimchy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040254448 | Amies | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254773 | Zhang | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050053267 | Mostafavi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054916 | Mostafavi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050143965 | Failla | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050197564 | Dempsey | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201516 | Ruchala | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207531 | Dempsey | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050254623 | Kamath | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264578 | Engel | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060033496 | Shvartsman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058636 | Wemple | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074292 | Thomson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079754 | Welch | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100502 | Chen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120583 | Dewaele | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060193441 | Cadman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070003021 | Guertin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016014 | Hara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070083114 | Yang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110159 | Wang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159174 | Oshio | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197908 | Ruchala | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216409 | Overweg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230770 | Kulkarni | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244386 | Steckner | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080049896 | Kuduvalli | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080093567 | Gall | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080177138 | Courtney | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080197842 | Lustig | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208036 | Amies | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080303457 | Maltz | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003532 | Weber | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039886 | White | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090066727 | Lu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090129545 | Adler | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149735 | Fallone | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175418 | Sakurai | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240135 | Gleich | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264768 | Courtney | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100008097 | Illium | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033186 | Overweg | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100113911 | Dempsey | May 2010 | A1 |
20100239066 | Fahrig | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100303358 | Acharyya | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304976 | Overweg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312100 | Zarkh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322497 | Dempsey | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012593 | Shvartsman | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110051893 | McNutt | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087090 | Boernert | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110118588 | Komblau | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121832 | Shvartsman | May 2011 | A1 |
20110156703 | O'Connor | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110218420 | Carlone | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241684 | Dempsey | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110284757 | Butuceanu | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285960 | Kohn | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120022363 | Dempsey | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120114208 | Hirasawa | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150017 | Yamaya | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155727 | Orderud | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165652 | Dempsey | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177260 | Su | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197102 | Hanebuchi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245453 | Tryggestad | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253172 | Loeffler | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120320055 | Pekar | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130066135 | Rosa | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130141094 | Miyazaki | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147476 | Shvartsman | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130195335 | Gorman | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223711 | Knapp | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130261429 | Lee | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261430 | Uhlemann | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130345545 | Gross | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345556 | Courtney | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003023 | Weibler | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003691 | Serlie | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140084926 | Amthor | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140112453 | Prince | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140128719 | Longfield | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135615 | Krulp | May 2014 | A1 |
20140266208 | Dempsey | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275963 | Shvartsman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140343543 | Karnik | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347053 | Dempsey | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150065860 | Shvartsman | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150126850 | Cetingul | May 2015 | A1 |
20150302601 | Rivet-Sabourin | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150346304 | Hu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160232690 | Ahmad | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160252596 | Nielsen | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160256712 | Vahala | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160324500 | Fan | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160324664 | Piron | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334479 | Poole | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160356869 | Dempsey | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170001039 | Dempsey | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170014644 | Shvartsman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032544 | Dempsey | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170371001 | Dempsey | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180143274 | Poole | May 2018 | A1 |
20190168028 | Dempsey | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190217126 | Shvartsman | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190353724 | Snelten | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190353725 | Dempsey | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200086143 | Maltz | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200147412 | Ni | May 2020 | A1 |
20200246637 | Wang | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102472830 | May 2012 | CN |
102641561 | Aug 2012 | CN |
1761794 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2359905 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2839894 | Nov 2003 | FR |
2219406 | Dec 1989 | GB |
2393373 | Mar 2004 | GB |
2001517132 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002186676 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002522129 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2004509723 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005103295 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006218315 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007526036 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2009501043 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009511222 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009160309 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009160378 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2011041656 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2012029767 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2013190421 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014502541 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2015511139 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2016513560 | May 2016 | JP |
2016516508 | Jun 2016 | JP |
1999032189 | Jul 1999 | WO |
2002072190 | Sep 2002 | WO |
20030008986 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004024235 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2005081842 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006007277 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006097274 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007007276 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007014105 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007045076 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008013598 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009099001 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009155700 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010103644 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010143400 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011008969 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2012164527 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2015138941 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015138945 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015138945 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lin et al. “Heart deformation analysis: measuring regional myocardial velocity with MR imaging”. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2016) 32 :1103-1111. DOI 10.1007/s10554-016-0879-z (Year: 2016). |
Lopez, Hector Sanchez et al.; “Designing an Efficient Resistive Magnet for Magnetic Resonance Imaging”; IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 40, No. 5; Sep. 2004; pp. 3378-3381. |
Lopez, Mike R. et al. ‘Relativistic Magnetron Driven by a Microsecond E-Beam Accelerator with a Ceramic Insulator’ IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science vol. 32, No. 3, Jun. 2004. pp. 1171-1180. |
Lurie, D.J., PhD. ‘Free radical imaging’ The British Journal of Radiology. 74 (2001). pp. 782-784. |
Lustig, et al. ‘L1 SPIR-IT: Autocalibrating Parallel Imaging Compressed Sensing.’ Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Radiology, Stanford University. Statistics, Stanford University (p. 334). |
Lustig, M, et. al. ‘Faster Imaging with Randomly Perturbed, Undersampled Spirals and |L|_1 Reconstruction.’ In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach, 2005. (1 page). |
Lustig, M, et. al. “L1 SPIR-iT: Autocalibrating Parallel Imaging Compressed Sensing.” In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2009 pp. 334. |
Mah et al., “Measurement of intrafractional prostate motion using magnetic resonance imaging,” Int. J. Radiation Oncology Boil. Phys. Vo.54, No. 2, pp. 568-575, 2002. |
Meulenbroeks, David; “Aluminum versus Copper Conductors—Application of Aluminum Conductors in Bus Way Systems for more Sustainable Data Centers”; Siemens Center of Competence Data Centers, The Netherlands; www.siemens.com/datacenter; White Paper Oct. 2014; 9 Pages. |
Meyer, et al. “Fast Spiral Coronary Artery Imaging”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 28, pp. 202-213 (1992). |
Momy, A. et al.; “Low-Leakage Wide-Access Magnet for MRI”; IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, No. 6; Nov. 1997; pp. 4572-4574. |
Morgan, Patrick N. et al.; “Resistive Homogeneous MRI Magnet Design by Matrix Subset Selection”; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 41:1221-1229; Wiley-Liss, Inc. (1999). |
Overweg et al. ‘System for MRI guided Radiotherapy.’ Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 17(2009):594. |
Overweg, Johan;“MRI Main Field Magnets”; Philips Research; Hamburg, Germany; 7 Pages. |
Paganelli Chiara et al; Liver 4DMRI: A Retrospective Image-based Sorting Method, Medical Physics, AIP; Melville, NY, US; vol. 42; No. 8; Jul. 24, 2015; pp. 4814-4821; XP012199252; ISSN: 0094-2405; DOI: 10.1118/1.4927252 (Retrieved on Jan. 1, 1901); Section 2.B. |
PCT App. No. PCT/US2010/039036; International Search Report dated Aug. 11, 2010; (pp. 1-2). |
PCT App. No. PCT/US2017/038520; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 4, 2017; (pp. 1-16). |
PCT App. No. PCT/US2017/038867; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 8, 2017; (pp. 1-12). |
Pryor, Larry et a.: “A Comparison of Aluminum vs. Copper Used in Electrical Equipment”; 7 Pages. |
Raaijmakers, A.J.E. et al. ‘Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue-air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons.’ Phys Med. Biol. 50 (2005) pp. 1363-1376. |
Raaymakers, B.W. et al. ‘Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose deposition in a transverse magnetic field’, Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (2004) 4109-4118. |
Reddy, B. Srinivasa, and B. N. Chatterji. ‘An FFT-Based Technique for Translation, Rotation, and Scale-Invariant Image Registration.’ IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 5, No. 8, Aug. 1996, pp. 1266-1271. |
Riek, et al. “Flow Compensation in MRI Using a Phase-Corrected Real Reconstruction”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 30, pp. 724-731, 1993. |
Riek, Jonathan K, et. al. ‘Flow Compensation in MRI Using a Phase-Corrected Real Reconstruction.’ Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 30, No. 6, 1993, pp. 724-731. |
Roullot Elodie et al. ‘Regularized reconstruction of 3D high-resolution magnetic resonance images from acquisitions of anisotropically degraded resolutions.’ Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. 15th International Conference on Sep. 3-7, 2000; [Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition. (ICPR)], Los Alamitos, CA, USA,IEEE Comput. Soc, US, vol. 3, Sep. 3, 2000 (Sep. 3, 2000), pp. 346-349. |
Sanchez, H. et al.; “Approach to Design an Efficient Resistive Magnet for MRI”; Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag, Reson. Med. 11 (2003); p. 2409. |
Schreiner, John; Kerr, Andrew; Salomons, Greg; Dyck, Christine, and Hajdok, George, ‘The Potential for Image Guided Radiation Therapy with Cobalt-60 Tomotherapy’, MICCAI 2003, LNCS 2879, pp. 449-456, 2003. |
Schreiner, L. John, et al. ‘The role of Cobalt-60 in modern radiation therapy: Dose delivery and image guidance’. Journal of Medical Physics, vol. 34, No. 3, 2009, 133-136. |
Sempau, Josep et al. ‘DPM, a fast, accurate Monte Carlo code optimized for photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning dose calculations.’ Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (2000) pp. 2263-2291, Received Feb. 29, 2000. Printed in the UK. |
Sherouse, George W. et al. ‘Virtual Simulation in the Clinical Setting: Some Practical Considerations’, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. vol. 19, pp. 1059-1065, Apr. 26, 1990, Pergamon Press, USA. |
Smolikova, R. et al.; “Registration of Fast Cine Cardiac MR Slices to 3D Procedural Images: Toward Real Time Registration for MRI-guided Procedures”; Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging 2004; vol. 5370 II; Feb. 16, 2004; pp. 1195-1205; XP040181910; San Diego, CA. |
St. Aubin et al,, ‘Magnetic decoupling on the linac in a low field biplanar linac-MR system’, Med. Phys, 37 (9), Sep. 2010, pp. 4755-4761. |
Tamada and Kose. ‘Two-Dimensional Compressed Sensing Using the Cross-sampling Approach for Low-Field MRI Systems.’ IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. vol. 33, No. 9. Sep. 2014. pp. 1905-1912. |
Tokuda, Junichi; Morikawa, Shigehiro; Dohi, Takeyoshi; Hata, Nobuhiko; Motion Tracking in MR-Guided Liver Therapy by Using Navigator Echoes and Projection Profile Matching, 2004. vol. 11. No. 1 pp. 111-120. |
Trzasko et al. ‘Highly Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction via Homotopic L0—Minimization’ IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. vol. 28. No. 1. Jan. 31, 2009, pp. 106-121. |
Trzasko et al. (Highly Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction vai Homotopic L0-Minimization, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Jul. 2, 2008, pp. 1-16). Article previously submitted by Applicant via IDS. |
von Siebenthal et al., “4D MR imaging of respiratory organ motion and its variability”. Physics in Medicine and Biology, pp. 1547 1564, Mar. 31, 2007. |
Von, Siebenthal M. et al; “4D MR Imaging of Respiratory Organ Motion and its Variability; 4D MRI of Respiratory Organ Motion”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Institiute of Physics Publishing, Bristol GB, vol. 52, No. 6, Mar. 21, 2007, pp. 1547-1564, XP20113239, ISSN: 0031-9155, DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/001, pp. 1547-1553. |
Warrington, Jim et al. ‘Cobalt 60 Teletherapy for Cancer: A Revived Treatment Modality for the 21st Century’, 2002 The Institution of Electrical Engineers, pp. 19-1-19/19. |
Wazer, David E. et al. ‘Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology (fifth edition).’, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2008. 2 pages. |
Weaver, John B.; “Simultaneous Multislice Acquisition of MR Images”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., vol. 8, No. 3, Nov. 1, 1988, pp. 275-284, XP000003030, ISSN: 0740-3194. |
Webb, S. ‘The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning’ The British Journal of Radiology, 76 (2003), 678-689, 2003 The British Institute of Radiology. |
Webb, Steve, ‘Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using only jaws and a mask: II. A simplified concept of relocatable single-bixel attenuators’, published May 22, 2002, Institute of Physics Publishing, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Phys. Med. Biol. 47 (2002) 1869-1879. |
Yang, Junfeng, et. al. ‘A Fast TVL1-L2 Minimization Algorithm for Signal Reconstruction from Rartial Fourier Data.’ Technical Report, TR08-27, CAAM, Rice University Houston, TX, 2008. pp. 1-10. |
Yoon et al. “Accuracy of an Automatic Patient-Positioning System Based on the Correlation of Two Edge Images in Radiotherapy”, Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 24, No. 2 Apr. 2011: pp. 322-330). |
Yuichiro Tajima, et al., “A Study on Non-Rigid Volume Registration Using 3D Phase-Only Correlation,” Technical Report of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Japan, IEICE, May 10, 2012, vol. 112, No. 38, pp. 107-112. |
Zaitsev M et al.: “Shared k-space Echo Planar Imaging with Keyhole,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. US, vol. 45, Jan. 1, 2001, pp. 109-117, XP002311925, ISSN: 0740-3194. |
Zitova B et al, ‘Image Registration Methods: A Survey’, Image and Vision Computing, Elsevier, Guildford, GB, (Oct. 1, 2003), vol. 21, No. 11, doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9, ISSN 0262-8856, pp. 977-1000, XP001189327. |
Mathieu Sarracanie et al: “Low Cost High Performance MRI”, Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 23, 702, May 15, 2015. |
Mutic Sasa et al: “The ViewRay System: Magnetic Resonance-Guided and Controlled Radiotherapy”, Seminars in Radiation Oncology, vol. 24, No. 3, Jun. 12, 2014 (Jun. 12, 2014), pp. 196-199. |
Anixter Inc. World Headquarters; “Wire Wisdom”; 2014 NEC 310.106 (B); 1 Page; 2016. |
AU Search Report dated Dec. 11, 2017; 2 pages. |
Aytekin Oto, MD, et al., Multidetector Row CT of the Liver; (2005) 43 ERDCNA 5 827-848. |
B W Raaymakers et al.; “Integrating a 1.5 T MRI Scanner with a 6 MV Accelerator: Proof of Concepts,” Physics in Medicine and Biology. vol. 54, No. 12, May 19, 2009, pp. N229-N237, XP055395399, Bristol GB ISSN: 0031-9155. 9 pages. |
Balter, James M., et al. ‘Accuracy of a Wireless Localization System for Radiotherapy’ Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 933-937, Nov. 1, 2004, Elsevier Inc., USA. |
Baro, J et al. ‘Penelope: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter’ Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 100 (1995) 31-46, received Sep. 30, 1994, Elsevier Science B.V. |
Barth, et al. “Simultaneous Multislice (SMS) Imaging Techniques.” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; vol. 75; pp. 33-81; 2016. |
Bernier, Jacques et al. ‘Radiation oncology: a century of achievements’ Nature Reviews-Cancer, vol. 4, Sep. 2004. pp. 737-747. |
Bhat et al. “3D Radial Sampling and 3D Affine Transform-based Respiratory Motion Correction Technique for Free-breathing Whole-Heart Coronary MRA with 100% Imaging Efficiency”. Magn Reson Med. May 2011 ; 65(5): 1269-1277. doi:10.1002/mrm .22717. (Year: 2011). |
Bilgin, A. et al. ‘Randomly Perturbed Radial Trajectories for Compressed Sensing MRI.’ Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 16 (2008):p. 3152. |
Blaimer, et al. ‘Smash, Sense, Pills, Grappa, How to Choose the Optimal Method’. Top Magan Reson Imaging, vol. 15, No. 4, Aug. 2004, pp. 223-236. |
Buchanan, Roger ‘Cobalt on the way out’ British Medical Journal, vol. 292, Feb. 1, 1986. p. 290. |
Buerger et al. “3D Non-Rigid Motion Modeling of the Liver from Undersampled Golden-Radial Phase Encoding (G-RPE) Acquisitions”. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 19 (2011). p. 643. (Year: 2011). |
Candes, et al. ‘Robust Uncertainty Principles: Exact Signal Reconstruction from Highly Incomplete Frequency Information.’ IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 489-509. |
Candes, et al. ‘Sparsity and Incoherence in Compressive Sampling’. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, 90332. Nov. 2006, pp. 1-20. |
Chng, N. et al. ‘Development of inverse planning and limited angle CT reconstruction for cobalt-60 tomotherapy’ Proceedings of 51st Annual Meeting of Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists and the Canadian College of Physicists in Medicine, 2005, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario. Medical Physics, 2005, p. 2426. (4 pages). |
CIPRA ‘L1-magic’ from SIAM News, vol. 39, No. 9, Nov. 2006. (3 pages). |
Cosmus, Thomas C. et al.; “Advances in Whole-Body MRI Magnets”; IEEE/CSC & ESAS European Superconductivity New Forum (ESNF), No. 14; Oct. 2010; 6 Pages; The published version of this manuscript appeared in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 21, Issue 3; pp. 2104-2109 (2011). |
Crijns et al. “Proof of concept of MRI-guided tracked radiation delivery: tracking one-dimensional motion”. Phys. Med. Biol. 57 (2012 ) 7863-7872 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7863 (Year: 2012). |
De Poorter J. et al. ‘Noninvasive MRI Thermometry with the Proton Resonance Frequencey (PRF) Method: In Vivo Results in Human Muscle,’ Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Academic Press, Duluth, vol. 33, No. 1, Jan. 1995 pp. 74-81 XP000482971. |
Donoho, David L., ‘Compressed Sensing’. Department of Statistics, Stanford University. Sep. 14, 2004. (34 pages). |
EP App. No. 10195476.6; Extended EP Search Report dated Jul. 4, 2011; 11 pages. |
EP App. No. 17000760.3; Extended EP Search Report dated Nov. 9, 2017; 7 pages. |
Fofanov, Dr. Denis et al.; “Magentic Properties of Stainless Steels: Applications, Opportunities and New Developments”; https://steelmehdipour.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Magnetic-properties-of-stainless-steels.pdf ; Webpage retrieved Feb. 2017; 13 Pages. |
Foroosh, Hassan, et.al. ‘Extension of Phase Correlation to Subpixel Registration.’ IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 11, No. 3, 2002, pp. 188-200. |
Gerganov G et al, ‘Portal image registration using the phase correlation method’, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC), IEEE, (Oct. 27, 2013), doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2013.6829306, pp. 1-3, XP032601397. |
Goitein, Michael. ‘Organ and Tumor Motion: An Overview.’ Seminars in Radiation Oncology. vol. 14, No. 1 Jan. 2004: pp. 2-9. |
Goldberg, S. Nahum; G. Scott Gazelle, and Peter R. Mueller. ‘Thermal Ablation Therapy for Focal Malignancy: A Unified Approach to Underlying Principles, Techniques, and Diagnostic Imaging Guidance.’ Amer. J. of Roentgenology, vol. 174, Feb. 2000 pp. 323-331 XP002431995. |
Haacke, Mark E. et al. ‘Constrained reconstruction: A superresolution, optimal signal-to-noise alternative to the Fourier transform in magnetic resonance imaging.’ Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, US, vol. 16, No. 3, May 1, 1989 (May 1, 1989), pp. 388-397, XP000034068, ISSN: 0094-2405, DDI: 10.1118/1.596427. |
Hajdok, George. ‘An Investigation of Megavoltage Computed Tomography Using a Radioactive Cobalt-60 Gamma Ray Source for Radiation Therapy Treatment Verification.’ Thesis. May 2002. 150 pages. |
Hernando, D. et al. ‘Interventional MRI with sparse sampling: an application of compressed sensing.’ Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.16 (2008):p. 1482. |
Hong Pan, et al., Review; New and Emerging Techniques for Mapping Brain Circuitry; (2011) 67 ESBRR 1-2 226-251. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, International Applicaiton No. PCT/US2018/059245, International Filing Date Nov. 5, 2018, dated Nov. 26, 2020, 24 pages. |
International Search Report of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2014/028792, dated Jul. 2, 2014. 3 pages. |
Irarrazabal, Pablo, and Dwight G. Nishimura. ‘Fast Three Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.’ Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 33, No. 5, 1995, pp. 656-662. |
Jaffray, David A., et al. ‘Flat-Panel Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy’ Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 1337-1349, Apr. 3, 2002, Elsevier Science Inc., USA. |
Jan J. W. Lagendijk et al.; “MR Guidance in Radiotherapy”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol GB, vol. 59, No. 21, Oct. 16, 2014, pp. R349-R369, XP020272054, ISSN: 0031-9155. |
Jursinic, Paul et al. ‘Characteristics of secondary electrons produced by 6, 10 and 24 MV x-ray beams’ Phys. Med. Biol. 41 (1996) 1499-1509, United Kingdom. |
Khan, Faiz M., ‘The Physics of Radiation Therapy (second edition)’, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Chapter 13. 1985. pp. 323-332. |
Kim et al. “Extraction of Cardiac and Respiratory Motion Cycles by Use of Projection Data and Its Applications to NMR Imaging”. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 13,25-37 (1990). (Year: 1990). |
Kolbitsch, C. et al.; “Cardiac Function Asssesment Without ECG Using Image-based Navigation”; Proceeding of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medincine, 20th Annual Meeting & Exhibition; May 5, 2010; p. 3849; KP040626270; Maelbourne, Australia. |
Kolbitsch, C. et al.; “Image-based Self-navigator Using Cardiac Functional Parameters for Cine Imaging”; Proceeding of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medincine, 20th Annual Meeting & Exhibition; May 5, 2010; p. 602; KP040623030; Maelbourne, Australia. |
Krombach G.A. “MRI Guidance of Vascular Applications”. In: Kahn T., Busse H. (eds) Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2011) (Year: 2011), 31 pages. |
Kwan-Jin Jung, et al., “Parallel Imaging with Asymmetric Acceleration to Reduce Gibbs Artifacts and to Increase Signal-To-Noise Ratio of the Gradient Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence for Functional MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 67:419-427 (2012). |
Lagendijk et al, ‘MRI/linac integration’, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Elsevier, Ireland, (Nov. 26, 2007), vol. 86, No. 1, doi:10.1016/J.RADONC.2007.10.034, ISSN 0167-8140, pp. 25-29, XP022423061. |
Lagendijk JJ W et al.: “MRI Guided Radiotherapy: A MRI based linear Accelerator”, Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 56, No. 01, Sep. 21, 2000 (Sep. 21, 2000), pp. S60-S61. |
Langen, K.M. et al. ‘Organ Motion and its Management.’ Int J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 265-278. 2001. Elsevier Science Inc., USA. |
Law, C., and Glover, G. ‘Deconvolving Haemodynamic Response Function in fMRI under high noise by Compressive Sampling.’ Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 17 (2009):p. 1712. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. |
Li, Kang and Kanadae, Takeo. ‘Nonnegative Mixed-Norm Preconditioning for Microscopy Image Segmentation.’ Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. vol. 5636. (2009):362-373. |
Liang, J. and D. Yan. ‘Reducing Uncertainties in Volumetric Image Based Deformable Organ Registration.’ Medical Physics, vol. 30, No. 8, 2003, pp. 2116-2122. |
Noel C et al: “TU-G-217A-09: Feasibility of Bowel Tracking Using Onboard Cine MRI for Gated Radiotherapy”, Medical Physics, Jun. 28, 2012 (Jun. 28, 2012), pp. 1-2, XP55832625, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118/1. |
PCT App. No. PCT/US2017/038520; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 3, 2019; (pp. 1-10). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220334199 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62353538 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15630890 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 17848287 | US |