Technical Field
The disclosure relates to a separator, and more particularly, to a magnetic separator.
Background
A magnetic separator is a device that performs a magnetic field treatment on magnetic substances with magnetic separation technology, it is mainly an emerging technology using a difference between magnetic susceptibilities of elements or components, and with the use of external magnetic field, to perform the magnetic field treatment on the magnetic substances to achieve separation. Moreover, the application scope of the magnetic separator has been extended to various fields.
In order to more effectively separate the magnetic substances with the magnetic separator, current industry is actively studying on how to enhance the separation effect of the magnetic separator.
The disclosure provides a magnetic separator including a magnetic structure. The magnetic structure includes magnetic structure units. The magnetic structure units form at least one continuous fluid channel. Each of the magnetic structure units has at least one protrusion and at least a portion of the adjacent two magnetic structure units has the protrusions facing towards each other. The magnetic structure may be a palisade magnetic structure.
Several exemplary embodiments accompanied with figures are described in detail below for easy to understand the features and advantages of the disclosure.
Referring to
The palisade magnetic structure 102 includes magnetic structure units 104. The magnetic structure units 104 are, for example, columnar magnetic structure units or magnetic bead structure units. In the present embodiment, the magnetic structure units 104 are exemplified by the columnar magnetic structure units, and the magnetic structure units 104 can extend along an axial direction Y. In other embodiments, the magnetic structure units 104 may also be the magnetic bead structure units.
The magnetic structure units 104 can be arranged into the palisade shape along an arrangement direction X. Moreover, the magnetic structure units 104 that are arranged into the palisade shape can further be stacked along a stacking direction Z. A length of the palisade magnetic structure 102 in the stacking direction Z can be greater than or equal to a length of the palisade magnetic structure 102 in the arrangement direction X, and thus can further enhance the separation effect.
In addition, the palisade magnetic structure 102 may further include at least one connecting member 106. The connecting member 106 is connected between two of the magnetic structure units 104, such as between the adjacent two magnetic structure units 104, and can be used to fix the positions of the magnetic structure units 104 to secure the structure of the palisade magnetic structure 102. The connecting member 106 can connect the magnetic structure units 104 with each other in the arrangement direction X, thereby forming base palisade units of the magnetic structure units 104. The connecting member 106 can further connect the base palisade units in the stacking direction Z so as to form a stacked palisade structure. The connecting member 106 and the magnetic structure units 104 may be an integrally formed component or independently formed components. The connecting members 106 may be disposed in a manner of regular arrangement or irregular arrangement. The arrangement of the connecting members 106 as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
In addition, referring to
Referring to
Referring to
A material of the magnetic structure units 104 is, for example, a magnetic material or a composition of the magnetic material and a polymer material. The magnetic material is, for example, a metal soft magnet, a soft magnetic ferrite or a combination thereof. A material of the metal soft magnet includes iron, silicon steel, nickel iron, cobalt iron, or stainless steel. The polymer material is, for example, polylactic acid (PLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polyethylene glycol (PEG), or a combination thereof. The polymer material can provide hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity, and is conducive for enhancing biocompatibility during separation of biochemical substance. A forming method of the palisade magnetic structure 102 is, for example, three-dimensional printing or injection molding. For example, the fabricated magnetic material and polymer material can be mixed first, and then be formed into gum-like strips by hot extrusion molding, thereafter the palisade magnetic structure 102 formed by the magnetic structure units 104 can be provided by the method of three-dimensional printing.
Referring to
Moreover, the magnetic separator 100 further includes a housing 112. The housing 112 has an input opening 114, an output opening 116 and a separation chamber 118. The separation chamber 118 is located between the input opening 114 and the output opening 116. The magnetic structure (e.g., the palisade magnetic structure 102) is disposed inside the separation chamber 118. The material of the housing 112 is, for example, a non-magnetic material. The non-magnetic material is, for example, a polymer material, non-magnetic metal or ceramics. The polymer material is, for example, polymethyl methacrylate, acrylic, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, Teflon, plastic, or Bakelite.
According to the above embodiment, it can be known that, in the magnetic separator 100, the palisade magnetic structure 102 has the protrusions 108 facing towards each other between at least a portion of the adjacent two magnetic structure units 104. As a result, during the separating process of the magnetic substances by the magnetic separator 100, since the protrusions 108 facing towards each other can effectively enhance the magnetic field gradient, the magnetic separator 100 is able to show the better separation effect.
Referring to
The magnetic structure units 204 can be arranged into a palisade shape along an arrangement direction X1 and an arrangement direction X2. Moreover, the magnetic structure units 204 being arranged into the palisade shape can further be stacked along a stacking direction Z1. A length of the palisade magnetic structure 202 in the arrangement direction X2 may be greater than or equal to a length of the palisade magnetic structure 202 in the arrangement direction X1. A length of the palisade magnetic structure 202 in the stacking direction Z1 may be greater than or equal to a length of the palisade magnetic structure 202 in the arrangement direction X2, and thus can further enhance the separation effect. In the present embodiment, the palisade magnetic structure 202 can be formed by closely aligned in the housing 112 of
The palisade magnetic structure 102 in
According to the above embodiment, it can be known that the palisade magnetic structure 202 has the protrusions 208 facing towards each other between at least a portion of the adjacent two magnetic structure units 204. As a result, during the separating process of the magnetic substances, since the protrusions 208 facing towards each other can effectively enhance the magnetic field gradient, a better separation effect can be achieved.
Referring to
In the following, the separation effects of the magnetic separators of the aforementioned embodiments are explained with experimental examples.
The palisade magnetic structures of the separators of the comparative example 1, the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2 are similar to the palisade magnetic structure 202 of
Referring to
Next, the magnetic bead structure units of the comparative example 1, the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2 are respectively filled into the housings and are stacked into the densest stacked structures so as to form the palisade magnetic structures.
Sample Solution
A cell separation test is performed using a KG1a cell line (human hematopoietic stem cell line, expressing CD34 surface antigens). The KG1a cells are performed to bind to the microbeads of 10 nm to 100 nm conjugated with CD34 antibodies. Moreover, the number of cells in the sample solution is adjusted to 3×107 cell/ml.
Separation Test
The housings configured with the palisade magnetic structures of the comparative example 1, the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2 are placed into a magnetic field in a manner as shown in the magnetic separator 100 of
Test Results
The numbers of the KG1a cells eluted by the washing solution in the comparative example 1, the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2 are calculated. Through calculation, the number of cells being separated in the comparative example 1 is approximately 60% of the number of cells being originally injected; namely, the separation effect is approximately 60%. The number of cells being separated in the experimental example 1 is approximately 68% of the number of cells being originally injected; namely, the separation effect is approximately 68%. The number of cells being separated in the experimental example 2 is approximately 82% of the number of cells being originally injected; namely, the separation effect is approximately 82%. As such, it can be known that the separation effects of those having the magnetic structure units covered with the protrusions on the surfaces thereof (e.g., the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2) are better than ones without protrusions (e.g., the comparative example 1). In which, the better separation effect is demonstrated by the experimental example 2 that has the magnetic structure units with more protrusions (
The palisade magnetic structures of the separators of the experimental example 3 and the experimental example 4 are similar to the palisade magnetic structure 102 of
Referring to
Next, the palisade magnetic structures of the experimental example 3 and the experimental example 4 are respectively filled into the housings.
Sample Solution
A cell separation test is performed using a KG1a cell line (human hematopoietic stem cell line, expressing CD34 surface antigens). The KG1a cells are performed to bind to the microbeads of 10 nm to 100 nm conjugated with CD34 antibodies. Moreover, the number of cells in the sample solution is adjusted to 3×107 cell/ml.
Separation Test
The housings configured with the palisade magnetic structures of the experimental example 3 and the experimental example 4 are placed into a magnetic field in a manner as shown in the magnetic separator 100 of
Test Results
The numbers of the KG1a cells eluted by the washing solution in the experimental example 3 and the experimental example 4 are calculated. Through calculation, the number of cells being separated in the experimental example 3 is approximately 57.8% of the number of cells being originally injected; namely, the separation effect is approximately 57.8%. The number of cells being separated in the experimental example 4 is approximately 81% of the number of cells being originally injected; namely, the separation effect is approximately 81%. As such, it can be known that the more protrusions as demonstrated in the experimental example 4, the better separation effect is displayed by the experimental example 4 as compared with the separation effect of the experimental example 3.
In view of the aforementioned experimental examples, since the magnetic structure units of the comparative example 1 do not have the protrusions, the separation effect thereof is less favorable. Due to the magnetic structure units of both the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2 have protrusions, the effect of magnetic permeability can be effectively increased and the magnetic field gradient can be enhanced. That is, the separation effects of the experimental example 1 and the experimental example 2 are both better than that of the comparative example 1. In which, the experimental example 2, as its the magnetic structure units have the more iron particles (protrusions) thereon, has the better effect on magnetic permeability and magnetic field gradient, thereby further enhancing the cell separation effect. Similarly, in the palisade magnetic structures formed by the 3D printing of the experimental example 3 and the experimental example 4, since the magnetic structure units of the experimental example 4 are disposed with additional protrusions, the effect of magnetic permeability and the magnetic field gradient can be enhanced, thereby providing better cell separation effect.
In summary, in the magnetic separators as mentioned in the above embodiments, since the magnetic structure has the protrusions facing towards each other between at least a portion of the adjacent two magnetic structure units, the magnetic field gradient can effectively be enhanced, thereby enabling the magnetic separators to perform the better separation effects.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the disclosed embodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the priority benefits of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/256,706, filed on Nov. 18, 2015. The entirety of the above-mentioned patent application is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2331769 | Frantz | Oct 1943 | A |
4289621 | O'Meara, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
5169006 | Stelzer | Dec 1992 | A |
5411863 | Miltenyi | May 1995 | A |
5705059 | Miltenyi | Jan 1998 | A |
5711871 | Miltenyi | Jan 1998 | A |
5868939 | Oder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5985153 | Dolan | Nov 1999 | A |
6241894 | Briggs et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
9884326 | Oki | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20040018611 | Ward et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050035030 | Oder et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20090311733 | Korpela | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120024770 | Ying | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140227777 | Choi et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2429832 | May 2001 | CN |
2609931 | Apr 2004 | CN |
101085874 | Dec 2007 | CN |
0941766 | Sep 1999 | EP |
200506365 | Feb 2005 | TW |
WO 9919071 | Apr 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chen et al., “2D modeling and preliminary in vitro investigation of a prototype high gradient magnetic separator for biomedical applications,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 30, 2008, pp. 1-8. |
Kato et al., “Isolation and Characterization of CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cells From Human Peripheral Blood by High-Gradient Magnetic Cell Sorting,” Cytometry, vol. 14, 1993, pp. 384-392. |
Mazutis et al., “Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics,” Nature Protocols, vol. 8, No. 5, May 2013, pp. 870-891 (48 pages total). |
Miltenyi et al., “High Gradient Magnetic Cell Separation With MACS,” Cytometry, vol. 11, 1990, pp. 231-238. |
Oberteuffer, “High Gradient Magnetic Separation,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. MAG-9, No. 3, Sep. 1973 (presented at the Intermag Conference, Apr. 24-27, 1973), pp. 303-306. |
Watson, “Magnetic filtration,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1973, pp. 4209-4213 (6 pages total). |
Wu et al., “Pulsed laser triggered high speed microfluidic fluorescence activated cell sorter,” Lab Chip, vol. 12, Feb. 15, 2012, pp. 1378-1383. |
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report, dated Jun. 6, 2017, for Taiwanese Application No. 105137765. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170165678 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62256706 | Nov 2015 | US |