The present invention relates to a magnetic shunt assembly for magnetic shielding of a power device, such as an electrical power transformer.
Magnetic shielding is employed to protect a certain object that has a certain volume, such as for example a power device, in particular a power transformer, from magnetic fields such as e.g. stray magnetic fields, which induce power losses. A known solution for magnetic shielding employs so called magnetic shunts that comprise magnetically highly permeable materials. This solution is also referred to as magnetic shunting.
In large power devices such as power transformers, the existence of a stray magnetic flux is usually inevitable and cannot be entirely prevented just by a careful and thorough design of the power device itself. Having a certain level of stray magnetic fields in a power transformer leads to a certain level of corresponding eddy currents in the affected conductive bodies of the power transformer such as e.g. the transformer tank, the eddy currents being induced by the stray magnetic flux. The induced eddy currents reduce the efficiency of the power device and further contribute to a possible overheating of the power device, thereby at the same time increasing the risk of a local temperature rise. To avoid the penetration of stray magnetic fields into conductive bodies of a power device, the before-mentioned magnetic shunts can be used.
Magnetic shunts are magnetic screens that consist of magnetically highly permeable material. Usually, several standardized magnetic shunts are combined in a shunting arrangement system that is placed between the source of the stray field and the object to be shielded. For example, to protect a tank wall of a power transformer from a stray magnetic field, the magnetic shunts are typically arranged in a row and placed parallel to the tank wall.
Although the use of magnetic shunts is an effective way to decrease the additional losses caused by the stray magnetic flux, a drawback which limits their use is that their vibration increases the load noise. Hence, magnetic shunts cannot be profitably used in case of strict load noise requirements.
The object of the present invention is therefore to provide a magnetic shunt assembly ensuring low noise emissions while maintaining an efficient load loss reduction.
This and other objects achieved by a magnetic shunt assembly in accordance with claim 1.
Dependent claims define possible advantageous embodiments of the invention.
Further characteristics and advantages of the magnetic shunt assembly according to the invention will be more apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments given as a way of an example with reference to the enclosed drawings in which:
With reference to the annexed
The magnetic shunt assembly 1 comprises a plurality of sheets 2, made of ferromagnetic material, such as electrical steel. By way of example, the ferromagnetic material can be a grain oriented ferromagnetic material. Sheets 2 have preferably the same shape, for example rectangular shape, still more preferably in the form of a thin plate, and are joined together. According to the embodiment schematically shown in
Turning back to
According to a possible embodiment, each of the bonding layer 3 is obtained from a thermosetting resin, in particular from a liquid thermosetting resin, which is cured after the application on the sheets 2. For example, possible thermosetting resins are: DuPont™ Voltalex® 1175W or C.D. Wälzholz PE 75W, both based on a water soluble epoxy resin. These resins are particularly compatible with the mineral oil used in the electrical power transformers. Of course, other similar thermosetting resins not explicitly cited can be alternatively employed.
If the thermosetting resin is used and the sheets 2 are stacked, the stack forming the magnetic shunt assembly 1 can be obtained by a so-called back lack process, which is typically used for manufacturing stators of electric motors.
According to this kind of approach, the process for manufacturing the magnetic shunt assembly 1 comprises:
In alternative to the above described process, structural adhesives can be deployed for forming the bonding layers 3.
According to a possible embodiment, the bonding layers 3 are formed from an epoxy adhesive system comprising an epoxy adhesive and a curing agent. Such adhesive systems are based on the curing of the epoxy resin forming the epoxy adhesive which is activated by the curing agent (such adhesive systems are referred to as “two-component adhesives”). Such systems in general do not require any heat treatment for curing. However, due to the generally high viscosity, preferably a pressing step of the coating after its application is carried out while the resin is still uncured, still more preferably is maintained during the whole curing. In this manner it is possible to eject the surplus of adhesive and to rectify the thickness and planarity of the components. Advantageously, in order to reduce the viscosity, suitable solvents may be added to the adhesives.
The epoxy adhesive systems of the two-component type can be selected for example in the following group:
According to another possible embodiment, the bonding layers 3 are formed from an epoxy adhesive system comprising an epoxy adhesive curable by heat. These epoxy adhesive systems are commonly referred to as one-component adhesives. The epoxy adhesive systems of the one-component type can be selected for example in the following group:
According to another alternative embodiment, the bonding layers 3 are formed from an acrylic adhesive system comprising an acrylic adhesive and a curing agent. These acrylic systems are of the two-component type and in general requires a shorter curing time than epoxy adhesives. An optional thermal treatment is possible to shorten the curing time. In general, the mechanical properties are lower than those of the epoxy adhesives. However, in general they have a lower viscosity, which results in an easier application of the adhesive. Moreover, they are in general lower cost.
The acrylic adhesive and the curing agent can be either pre-mixed before being applied on opposite surfaces of subsequent sheets to be bonded, or, alternatively, can be respectively applied on opposite surfaces of subsequent sheets and mixed upon joining the sheets.
The acrylic adhesive systems can be selected for example in the following group:
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a tank for a power device, for example for a power transformer, is provided with one or more of magnetic shunt assemblies according to the invention.
With reference to
The coupling of the magnetic shunt assemblies 1 with the internal surfaces 102 of the tank walls 101 can be obtained in several different manners. According to a possible embodiment, the magnetic shunt assemblies 1 are coupled with the internal surfaces 102 of the tank walls 101 by welding. With reference for example to
According to a further possible embodiment, the magnetic shunt assemblies 1 are coupled with the internal surfaces 102 of the tank walls 101 by bolting. With reference for example to
According to a further possible embodiment, the magnetic shunt assemblies 1 are coupled with the internal surfaces 102 of the tank walls 101 by mechanical coupling means of different type. With reference for example to
According to a further possible embodiment (see for example
The magnetic shunt assembly according to the invention, while maintaining a proper magnetic shielding when associated to a power device, ensures lower noise emissions than standard magnetic shunts since the ferromagnetic sheets are integral due the presence of the bonding layers. Hence, magnetic shunt assemblies according to the invention can be used in case of strict load noise requirement, where standard magnetic shunts generate unacceptable vibration noise.
To the above-mentioned embodiments of the magnetic shunt assembly according to the invention, the skilled person, in order to meet specific current needs, can make several additions, modifications, or substitutions of elements with other operatively equivalent elements, without however departing from the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2567717 | Lagerlof | Sep 1951 | A |
3014189 | MacKinnon | Dec 1961 | A |
4068040 | Yamada | Jan 1978 | A |
4365407 | Zdaniewski | Dec 1982 | A |
4447795 | Sefko | May 1984 | A |
5045637 | Sato | Sep 1991 | A |
5139857 | Herndon | Aug 1992 | A |
5174833 | Tanaka | Dec 1992 | A |
20030020579 | Ngo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050073818 | Hirano | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070086127 | Huang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20100033187 | Reiderman | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100321143 | Satake | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120065073 | Maher | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120137511 | Flaherty | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120156441 | Gerster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1763354 | Nov 1971 | DE |
3415785 | Oct 1984 | DE |
3415785 | Oct 1984 | DE |
102008048486 | Apr 2010 | DE |
1270804 | Apr 1971 | GB |
101513052 | Apr 2015 | KR |
2014185267 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nationalmaglab_tutorial on Magnegtic Shunt_pp. 1-6_Dec. 10, 2014. |
European Patent Office, International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in corresponding Application No. PCT/EP2015/073617, dated Jun. 10, 2016, 12 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180233276 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2015/073617 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15952643 | US |