This application claims priority to Chinese Utility Model application 201420264902.1, filed May 22, 2014.
Immunoprecipitation is a laboratory technique for isolating a protein from a solution. In one technique, paramagnetic beads are coated with antibodies specific to the protein of interest, and the beads are introduced into the solution and the proteins of interest bind to the antibodies on the beads. A magnet is used to retain the beads in a localized part of the container in which the solution is held. The solution is then pipetted or poured out of the container, leaving the beads in the container and coated with the protein of interest. The magnet and the container can then be separated so that the beads can be easily removed from the container for further processing.
Typically, multiple containers are handled in a group, in order to increase the efficiency of the isolation. Improvements are needed in devices for managing such groups of containers for immunoprecipitation and other techniques.
According to one aspect, a system for holding sample tubes comprises a top plate defining a first plurality of holes. Each of the first plurality of holes is a though hole through the top plate and is sized for accommodating an outer diameter of a respective sample tube. The system also comprises a bottom plate defining a second plurality of holes. Each of the second plurality of holes is sized to accommodate a tip of a respective sample tube. The first and second pluralities of holes are positioned to cooperatively hold the sample tubes in a pair of parallel rows. The system also comprises a removable magnet holder configured to slide between the top plate and the bottom plate and between the two rows of sample tubes. The magnet holds a plurality of magnets that, when the magnet holder is fully inserted between the rows of sample tubes, align with the sample tubes in the parallel rows. In some embodiments, the system further comprises a pair of end plates to which the top and bottom plates are attached at opposing ends, and that hold the top and bottom plates in spaced-apart relation. In some embodiments, a first of the two endplates defines an opening through which the magnet holder slides when the magnet holder is inserted between the rows of sample tubes. In some embodiments, the system further comprises a ferromagnetic retainer affixed to the second of the two endplates and aligned with a distal end of the magnet holder, such that the magnet nearest the distal end of the magnet holder and the ferromagnetic retainer, by magnetic attraction, cooperate to removably retain the magnet holder in position between the rows of sample tubes. Each of the second plurality of holes may be sized to engage a tapered tip of a respective sample tube in a press fit. In some embodiments, each of the second plurality of holes includes a round portion sized to engage a tapered tip of a respective sample tube in a press fit and an oblong portion having a width less than the diameter of the round portion, the oblong portion extending from the round portion toward an outside edge of the bottom plate. The first and second pluralities of holes may be sized to engage micro-centrifuge sample tubes each having a nominal capacity of 1.5 ml.
According to another aspect, a method comprises inserting a plurality of sample tubes into a rack. The rack includes a top plate defining a first plurality of holes and includes a bottom plate spaced apart from the top plate. The bottom plate defines a second plurality of holes, the first and second pluralities of holes cooperating to hold the sample tubes in a pair of parallel rows. The method further comprises sliding a magnet holder between the top and bottom plate and between the two parallel rows such that a plurality of magnets held by the magnet holder align with the sample tubes in the parallel rows. In some embodiments, the method further comprises placing the rack in a rest position, and removing the magnet holder without disturbing the rack from its rest position.
According to another aspect, a system for holding sample tubes comprises a plurality of sample tubes, and a rack. The rack includes a top plate defining a first plurality of holes and includes a bottom plate spaced apart from the top plate. The bottom plate defines a second plurality of holes, the first and second pluralities of holes cooperating to hold the sample tubes in a pair of parallel rows. The system further includes a magnet holder holding a plurality of magnets, such that when the magnet holder is inserted between the top and bottom plates and between the parallel rows of tubes, the magnets align with the sample tubes in the parallel rows. In come embodiments, each of the sample tubes has a nominal capacity of 1.5 ml.
According to another aspect, a system for holding sample tubes comprises top and bottom plates spaced apart from each other and defining rows of holes to receive the sample tubes and hold the sample tubes in a pair of spaced-apart rows. The system further comprises a magnet holder configured to slide between the top and bottom plates and between the two parallel rows of sample tubes such that when the magnet holder is fully inserted between the rows of sample tubes, magnets held by the magnet holder align with the sample tubes in the two parallel rows. In some embodiments, when the magnet holder is inserted between the rows of sample tubes, no material is disposed between the magnets and the sample tubes. In some embodiments, the magnet holder can be removed from the rack without disturbing the position of the rack. In some embodiments, the holes in the bottom plate are sized to engage the sample tubes in a press fit, such that the sample tubes remain in fixed positions in relation to the rack during laboratory handling. In some embodiments, each of the holes in the bottom plate defines an oblong portion extending toward an outer edge of the bottom plate and enabling visual inspection of the tip of a sample tube inserted into the respective hole in the bottom plate.
In prior systems used for immunoprecipitation, a rack holds a plurality of sample tubes above one or more magnets. Separating the magnet from the sample tubes (for freeing the beads after the solution has been removed) involves lifting the rack. In general, it is desirable to minimize the amount of handling that the sample tubes are subjected to.
Magnetic tube rack 100 is configured for handling of a number of sample tubes 105. In the example embodiment of
Referring again to
Bottom plate 102 defines a second plurality of holes 107. Holes 107 may be through holes or blind recesses within bottom plate 102. Each of holes 107 is sized to accommodate the tip of its respective sample tube 105. In some embodiments, sample tubes 105 may be pressed into holes 107, so that tapered portions 202 of the sample tubes press into holes 107 and constrain the height of sample tubes 105 within rack 100. This press fit also constrains sample tubes 105 from rotating during normal laboratory handling of rack 100.
A magnet holder 108, described in more detail below, operates in conjunction with magnetic tube rack 100, to facilitate experiments conducted using magnetic tube rack 100. Magnet holder 108 may be made of materials similar to the materials of top, bottom, and end plates 101-104.
A pair of larger openings 109 (only one of which is visible in
As is visible in
A ferromagnetic retainer 404 is affixed to end plate 103, opposite opening 402. Retainer 404 serves as a stop or bumper against which magnet holder 108 can rest when it is fully inserted into rack 100, and also provides a mechanism for removably retaining magnet holder 108 in rack 100. Retainer 404 may itself be a magnet, or may simply be a ferromagnetic material to which magnets 401 may be attracted.
In the claims appended hereto, the term “a” or “an” is intended to mean “one or more.” The term “comprise” and variations thereof such as “comprises” and “comprising,” when preceding the recitation of a step or an element, are intended to mean that the addition of further steps or elements is optional and not excluded. The invention has now been described in detail for the purposes of clarity and understanding. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014 2 0264902 U | May 2014 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4411868 | Noack | Oct 1983 | A |
4895650 | Wang | Jan 1990 | A |
5571481 | Powell et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
6193892 | Krueger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
20110031168 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130209995 | Andrulat et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP patent application No. 15168625.0, mailed on Sep. 28, 2015, 7 pages. |
DynaMag, 2012, pp. 1-2; LifeTechnologies Corporation. |
“PureProteome™ Magnetic Stand, 8-well Cat. No. LSKMAGS08”; 2010; pp. 1-2; Millipore Corporation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150336102 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |