The present invention relates generally to a magnetic vector sensor positioning and communications system. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system for monitoring the movement of one or more magnets located external to a device using the vector data from one or more magnetic vector sensors incorporated in the device to determine a position and/or to communicate information.
Touchscreens
A touchscreen is an electronic visual display that can detect the presence and location of a touch within the display area. The term generally refers to touching the display of the device with a finger or hand. Touchscreens can also sense other passive objects, such as a stylus. Touchscreens are common in devices such as game consoles, all-in-one computers, tablet computers, and smartphones.
The touchscreen has two main attributes. First, the touchscreen enables one to interact directly with what is displayed, rather than indirectly with a pointer controlled by a mouse or touchpad. Secondly, the touchscreen lets one do so without requiring any intermediate device that would need to be held in the hand (other than a stylus, which is optional for most modern touchscreens). Such displays can be attached to computers, or to networks as terminals. They also play a prominent role in the design of digital appliances such as the personal digital assistant (PDA), satellite navigation devices, mobile phones, and video games.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchscreen
Capacitive Touchscreens
A capacitive touchscreen panel consists of an insulator such as glass, coated with a transparent conductor such as indium tin oxide (ITO). As the human body is also an electrical conductor, touching the surface of the screen results in a distortion of the screen's electrostatic field, measurable as a change in capacitance. Different technologies may be used to determine the location of the touch (e.g., see capacitive sensing touchscreen technology discussed below). The location is then sent to the controller for processing. However, one cannot use a capacitive touchscreen through most types of electrically insulating material, such as gloves, instead one requires a special capacitive stylus, or a special-application glove with an embroidered patch of conductive thread passing through it and contacting the user's fingertip. This disadvantage especially affects usability in consumer electronics, such as touch tablet PCs and capacitive smartphones in cold weather.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchscreen
Resistive Touchscreens
Resistive touchscreens are touch-sensitive computer displays composed of two flexible sheets coated with a resistive material and separated by an air gap or microdots. There are two different types of metallic layers. The first type is called Matrix, in which striped electrodes on substrates such as glass or plastic face each other. The second type is called Analogue which consists of transparent electrodes without any patterning facing each other. As of 2011, Analogue offered lowered production costs when compared to Matrix. In Analogue, when contact is made to the surface of the touchscreen, the two sheets are pressed together. On these two sheets there are horizontal and vertical lines that, when pushed together, register the precise location of the touch. Because the touchscreen senses input from contact with nearly any object (finger, stylus/pen, palm) resistive touchscreens are a type of “passive” technology.
For example, during operation of a four-wire touchscreen, a uniform, unidirectional voltage gradient is applied to the first sheet. When the two sheets are pressed together, the second sheet measures the voltage as distance along the first sheet, providing the X coordinate. When this contact coordinate has been acquired, the uniform voltage gradient is applied to the second sheet to ascertain the Y coordinate. These operations occur within a few milliseconds, registering the exact touch location as contact is made.
Resistive touchscreens typically have high resolution (4096×4096 DPI or higher), providing accurate touch control. Because the touchscreen responds to pressure on its surface, contact can be made with a finger or any other pointing device.
Resistive touchscreen technology works well with almost any stylus-like object, and can also be operated with gloved fingers and bare fingers alike. In some circumstances, this is more desirable than a capacitive touchscreen, which has to be operated with a capacitive pointer, such as a bare finger (latest capacitive technology enables gloves on touchscreens). The resistive touchscreen costs are relatively low when compared with active touchscreen technologies. Resistive touchscreen technology can be made to support multi-touch input.
For people who must grip the active portion of the screen or must set their entire hand down on the screen, alternative touchscreen technologies are available, such as an active touchscreen in which only the stylus creates input and skin touches are rejected. However, newer touchscreen technologies allow the use of multi-touch without the aforementioned vectoring issues.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistive_touchscreen
Capacitive Sensing Touchscreen Technology
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistive_touchscreen
Capacitive sensing is a technology based on capacitive coupling that is used in many different types of sensors, including those to detect and measure proximity, position or displacement, humidity, fluid level, and acceleration. Capacitive sensing as a human interface device (HID) technology, for example to replace the computer mouse, is growing increasingly popular. Capacitive touch sensors are used in many devices such as laptop trackpads, digital audio players, computer displays, mobile phones, mobile devices, tablets and others. More and more design engineers are selecting capacitive sensors for their versatility, reliability and robustness, unique human-device interface and cost reduction over mechanical switches.
Capacitive sensors detect anything that is conductive or has a dielectric different than that of air. While capacitive sensing applications can replace mechanical buttons with capacitive alternatives, other technologies such as multi-touch and gesture-based touchscreens are also premised on capacitive sensing.
Capacitive sensing touchscreens do not respond to a traditional stylus and instead require a capacitive stylus, which is unable to provide high resolution positional input. A typical capacitive stylus has a conductive tip shaped similar to a fingertip, which is made out of capacitive foam. Another capacitive stylus resembles a ball point pen but has a flat round plastic disk attached to the point of the pen. Still another capacitive stylus has a stainless steel ring that has a vinyl film on the surface that makes contact with a touchscreen. Yet another type of capacitive stylus includes a magnet in the head of the stylus enabling a capacitive sensing touchscreen to detect that it has been touched by the stylus. This stylus is described in U.S. Patent Application No. 2009/0167727, filed Dec. 16, 2008, and entitled “Stylus and Electronic Device”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Many devices having capacitive touchscreen interfaces also include at least one vector magnetics sensor (or vector magnetometer) used to determine the orientation of the device or a portion of the device (e.g., a hinged display that can move from an open position to a closed position). More specifically, the at least one magnetics sensor is used to sense (or measure) the magnetic field produced by the Earth and provides one-dimensional, two dimensional, or three-dimensional orientation information in the form of X, Y, and/or Z vector data that can be processed by software typically resident on the device (but which can be remote) to determine how the device is being moved about by the user. Such vector magnetics sensor data (or information) enables applications such as games where the device (e.g., a cell phone) itself can be used as a game controller. Magnetic sensor information can also be used to determine the state of a device's display (e.g., open, closed, nearly closed, etc.), such as is the case with Apple® laptop computers, where the position of the display relative to the keyboard is used to change the state of the machine (e.g., on, sleep, off). Similarly, the cover of the Apple iPad® includes a magnet that is detectable by a magnetic field sensor, which is used for determining whether or not the cover is covering the display.
Magnets external to a device have been used to interact with an electronic device having a magnetometer. U.S. Patent Application No. 2011/0190060, filed Jan. 31, 2011, and entitled “Around Device Interaction for Controlling and Electronic Device, for Controlling a Computer Game and for User Verification”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, describes use of a magnetometer within an electronic device to measure changes in magnetic strengths resulting from the relative motion of an external magnet in order to identify (or recognize) gesture induced movements. The tracking of the relative movement of a magnet is described as being coarse and magnetic field amplitude based, where polarity is only used to identify one magnet vs. another. The relative motion is only discerned and is not absolute position-based. Generally, gestures can be recognized regardless of where a given motion actually occurs or originates relative to the device. However, because the gestures are position indeterminate the ability to provide high resolution precision input as required for absolute position-based functions such as precision drawing or lettering is not enabled. Instead the coarse movement of the magnet only enables recognition of gestures such as moving a hand downward, swiping left or right, rotating, zooming, etc. Examples of the magnet gesturing systems are provided in
U.S. Patent Application No. 2012/0084051, filed May 21, 2010, and entitled “Method and Arrangement for Magnetically Determining a Position”, the contents of which are herein incorporated herein by reference, describes magnetically determining a position of a permanent magnet located above a magnetic sensor array, where the vector and local gradient of the magnetic flux density of the a spherical homogenously magnetized magnet is measured using a position sensor. The position and orientation of the magnetic dipole of the permanent magnet relative to the position sensor is calculated from the measured values. A spherical permanent magnet having homogenous magnetization is used to prevent previously present cross-sensitivity between the position and orientation determination, and allowing measurement without prior calibration.
Examples of use of a magnetometer for communicating with an electronic device and determining a position can also be found in a story available on an online blog at http://blog.makezine.com/2012/10/29/magnetic-appcessories-with-andrea-bianchi/, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
A web log by Joe DesBonnet found at http://jdesbonnet.blogspot.com/2011_05_01_archive.html (the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein) describes a cheap and simple one-way communications link from an Arduino microcontroller to an Android cellphone, where he uses a digital IO line of the Arduino to drive a coil of wire placed over the magnetometer of the Android. He employs a Non Return to Zero encoding scheme, where he monitors the output of one axis (Z) of the magnetometer using the Android ‘Tricorder’ application. He successfully communicated “Hello World!” at approximately 7 bps and suggested potential improvements to increase his data rate including using a DAC, using four power levels to encode 2 bits per symbol and using forward error correction. He also mentions that it might be possible to construct a set of coils that excite the X, Y, and Z channels independently to triple his data rate. He further mentions some applications might only require an analog signal.
A system, a first device and various methods are described in the independent claims of the present application. Advantageous embodiments of the system, the first device, and the various methods have been described in the dependent claims of the present application.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a system comprising: (1) a first device comprising a screen and at least one vector magnetic sensor; (2) a second device comprising a magnet; (3) the first device utilizes the at least one vector magnetic sensor which interfaces with the magnet in the second device to obtain vector data which corresponds to an absolute orientation and location of the second device within a coordinate system based on an absolute orientation and location of the first device; and (4) the first device utilizes the vector data to map the location of the second device to a location on the screen.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a first device (and a method implemented by the same) which interfaces with a second device that has a magnet. The first device comprises: (1) a screen; (2) at least one vector magnetic sensor; (3) a processor; and (4) a memory that stores processor-executable instructions where the processor interfaces with the memory and executes the processor-executable instructions to enable the following operations: (a) interface with second device which comprises a magnet; (b) obtain vector data which corresponds to an absolute orientation and location of the second device within a coordinate system based on an absolute orientation and location of the first device; and (c) utilize the vector data to map the location of the second device to a location on the screen.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a first device (and a method implemented by the same) which interfaces with a second device which has a plurality of magnets. The first device comprises: (1) at least one vector magnetic sensor; (2) a processor; and (3) a memory that stores processor-executable instructions where the processor interfaces with the memory and executes the processor-executable instructions to enable the following operations: (a) determine a position within an environment by interacting with the second device which comprises a plurality of magnets with magnetic fields which are modulated to function as an identifier or provide coordinates of a reference location within an established coordinate system.
In still another aspect, the present invention provides a first device (and a method implemented by the same) which interfaces with a second device associated with a security door and a server. The first device comprises: (1) a screen; (2) at least one vector magnetic sensor; (3) a processor; and (4) a memory that stores processor-executable instructions where the processor interfaces with the memory and executes the processor-executable instructions to enable the following operations: (a) interact with the second device which comprises a plurality of magnets with magnetic fields which are modulated to function as an identifier of the security door; (b) send, to the server, the identifier of the security door along with an identifier of the first device, wherein the server sends a validation code to the security door which the security device uses to produce a validation emission; (c) receive, from the security door, the validation emission; and (d) send, to the server, the validation emission.
Additional aspects of the invention will be set forth, in part, in the detailed description, figures and any claims which follow, and in part will be derived from the detailed description, or can be learned by practice of the invention. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention as disclosed.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, vector magnetic sensor-based orientation sensing capabilities of a first device are leveraged to determine the orientation of one or more second devices that may be associated with the first device, where the first device comprises at least one vector magnetics sensor and each of the one or more second devices comprises at least one magnet, where the at least one magnet may be a permanent magnet, an electromagnet, or a electro-permanent magnet. Specifically, a second device may comprise a stylus, a joystick, a game controller, a mouse, a glove, a keyboard, an eyepiece, a laptop, a trackpad, a digital audio player, a computer display, a mobile phone, a mobile device, a tablet, etc. Moreover, the second device could merely be a magnet.
In accordance with a first embodiment of the invention depicted in
As shown in
Under one aspect of the invention two or more first devices 100 can communicate using one or more communications capabilities available to the first devices 100 such as cellular communications, WI-FI communications, or the like, to share vector data. One skilled in the art will recognize that having more magnetic sensors and having more detection angles enables ambiguities of orientation and location to be resolved more easily to include ambiguities resulting from the second device including multiple magnets.
One skilled in the art will recognize that all sorts of non-alternating ‘coded’ magnet patterns can be employed including other one-dimensional arrays (e.g., Barker 4, Barker 5, etc.), two-dimensional arrays, and three-dimensional arrays where the magnets can have the same shapes, sizes and field strengths or could have different combinations of shapes, sizes, and field strengths. Moreover, multi-pole printed magnetic structures can be used. Alternatively, the magnets could be electromagnets or electro-permanent magnets enabling them to be switched on and off, their coding varied, or their magnetic fields to be otherwise varied (e.g., field strength) in accordance with a modulation pattern that can be demodulated as a form of communication whereby wave theory and modulation are applied to magnetometers. For example, magnetic properties could be varied in time as a form of modulation.
Generally, coded patterns of conventional magnets or modulating electromagnets or electro-permanent magnets can be used to provide differentiation from individual magnets that are present in an environment in which the first and second devices are present. As such, a first device can identify and authenticate magnets, electromagnets, or electro-permanent magnets associated with a second device to which the first device desires to interface for position tracking or communications purposes. Coded magnetic structures are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,219, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. One skilled in the art will understand that an alternating polarity magnetic field is a uniformly alternating polarity magnetic field, whereas a coded polarity magnetic field is not uniformly alternating, and that one can implement a non-alternating polarity code such as a Barker 4 code (+ + − +) with different sized alternating polarity magnets that produce a non-uniformly alternating (or coded) polarity magnetic field.
The present invention uses vector data corresponding to the absolute orientation and location of a second device relative to the absolute orientation and location of a first device to calculate the motion of the second device (or the first device) over time. In order to accomplish motion calculations, a calibration process is required where the orientation (e.g., 0 degrees from a plane horizontal to the ground and facing in the X direction) and location (e.g., 0, 0, 0) of the first device within a coordinate system must be established and then the location(s) of the one or more magnets 126 in a second object relative to the orientation and location of the first device must be determined. Then, based on a priori knowledge of the arrangement of the one or more magnets 126 associated with the second device, the absolute orientation and location of the second device can be determined. The calibration process will typically involve moving the second device to locations within a predefined pattern (e.g., points on a square, rectangle, circle, figure eight, etc.) where the second device may be some distance away from (i.e., external to) the first device or the second device may be in contact with or near contact with the first device (e.g., using a display of the first device and locations thereon where the second device is used to draw something, trace something, or identify multiple points on the device). Alternatively, the calibration process could involve moving the first device relative to the second device where the location and orientation of the second device is fixed. The calibration process might involve leaving the first device fixed and moving the second device and then leaving the second device fixed and moving the first. The first device may also include an accelerometer where it can determine whether or not it is moving and can calibrate and re-calibrate motion calculations accordingly (e.g., re-calibrate when it recognizes it is stationary). The system may also recognize conditions whereby it requires a re-calibration process to be performed, for example, it may re-calibrate periodically based on a timing schedule or it may re-calibrate because of the occurrence of an event (e.g., a threshold being met, a time limit being surpassed, a measured value being outside an acceptable range, etc.).
Calibration of a system of the invention may involve determining the orientation and location of the first device relative to one or more magnets associated with one or more second devices located at reference locations within an environment. The one or more reference locations may be associated with a stationary object such as the vending machine 1012, gas pump 1016, cash register 1018, or automated teller machine 1020 of
Measurements of a vector and local gradient of the magnetic field(s) associated with a magnet(s) of a second device are not required given a priori knowledge of the shape and field strength of the magnetic field(s) of the magnet(s) associated with the second device. Without such a priori knowledge, the vector and local gradient of the magnetic field of a magnet(s) associated with a second device can be measured using the vector data of the one or more sensors of the first device.
The locations of the first device and second device can be determined relative to a location corresponding to location information provided by one or more location information systems such as a Global Positioning System, a Wi-Fi position tracking system, or an Ultra Wideband positioning system.
The movement of a vehicle in which the first device resides, movement of a person holding the first device, or the movement of any other moving object to which the first device is associated with can be determined using the accelerometer capabilities of the first device.
When a second device includes a coded magnetic array such as the Barker 3 array shown in
The second device can be a tool (e.g., a scalpel used by a surgeon or even a robot). The second device can be a robotic hand or a finger of a robotic hand.
The vector magnetic sensor array of the first device can track the orientation of a plurality of second devices (e.g., multiple fingers of a robotic hand or the fingers of a glove worn by a person).
The first device can also track orientation of multiple objects such as multiple game pieces near the device (e.g., pieces of a chess game on a game board near a PDA).
Control signals can be conveyed from the first device to the second device to control the movement of the second device (e.g., a feedback control system), where the second device is moved, tracked by the first device, and the first device sends data back to the second device concerning its movement to include new movement instructions.
Alternatively, the second device can be in a fixed location/orientation and the first device can determine its own movement relative to the location/orientation of the second device.
Under one arrangement, a plurality of first devices can be coordinated (e.g., 2 androids providing 2 look angles) to determine information pertaining to a second device.
An authentication scenario for a security door access control system could be as follows:
With such an authentication approach, most any transaction can be authenticated via ones cellphone.
With a network of modulating magnetic sources (beacons) at known locations within a building, a phone can determine where it's at inside the building as it is moved, for example by a person, about the building.
The beacons would emit their locations (e.g., latitude/longitude/altitude) or provide an identifier that the phone could use with a location look up table.
One of the things that can be made available to the phone is a map of a facility or a home identifying where beacons are in the facility. New beacons can be added and discovered and removed and determined.
If the phone has a compass and an accelerometer, they can be used in combination with the magnetometer to provide information used to interpolate and extrapolate in between beacons.
The phone can verify an environment based on a priori knowledge of the beacon supposedly present and can determine if a beacon is no longer present (for replacement purposes).
Different types of beacons can have different magnetic characteristics (e.g., different throw, different amplitude, different directionality, different coding). Information about the type of beacon (determined based on magnetic characteristics) can provide more information about location, authentication, allow for efficiencies of operation, etc. For example, coils used with electromagnets can be small or very big.
Phones can receive information from RF sources, barcodes, and magnetic stripes.
Two devices each having a magnetometer and a modulating magnetic source can have two-way communications.
Using feedback control, the second device can receive position/motion control information via a wireless link from a first device tracking the position of the second device, which enables the second device to be dumb.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited thereto, since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
This application claims the benefit U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/746,456 filed on Dec. 27, 2012. The contents of this document are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
93931 | Westcott | Aug 1869 | A |
342666 | Williams | May 1886 | A |
361248 | Winton | Apr 1887 | A |
381968 | Tesla | May 1888 | A |
400809 | Van Depoele | Apr 1889 | A |
405109 | Williams | May 1889 | A |
450543 | Van Depoele | Apr 1891 | A |
493858 | Edison | Mar 1893 | A |
675323 | Clark | May 1901 | A |
687292 | Armstrong | Nov 1901 | A |
996933 | Lindquist | Jul 1911 | A |
1024418 | Podlesak | Apr 1912 | A |
1081462 | Patton | Dec 1913 | A |
1171351 | Neuland | Feb 1916 | A |
1180489 | Geist | Apr 1916 | A |
1184056 | Deventer | May 1916 | A |
1236234 | Troje | Aug 1917 | A |
1252289 | Murray, Jr. | Jan 1918 | A |
1290190 | Herrick | Jan 1919 | A |
1301135 | Karasick | Apr 1919 | A |
1307342 | Brown | Jun 1919 | A |
1312546 | Karasick | Aug 1919 | A |
1323546 | Karasick | Aug 1919 | A |
1554236 | Simmons | Jan 1920 | A |
1343751 | Simmons | Jun 1920 | A |
1544010 | Jordan | Jun 1925 | A |
1554254 | Zbinden | Sep 1925 | A |
1624741 | Leppke et al. | Dec 1926 | A |
1784256 | Stout | Dec 1930 | A |
1785643 | Noack et al. | Dec 1930 | A |
1823326 | Legg | Sep 1931 | A |
1895129 | Jones | Jan 1933 | A |
1975175 | Scofield | Oct 1934 | A |
2048161 | Klaiber | Jul 1936 | A |
2058339 | Metzger | Oct 1936 | A |
2147482 | Butler | Dec 1936 | A |
2111643 | Salvatori | Mar 1938 | A |
2130213 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1938 | A |
2158132 | Legg | May 1939 | A |
2186074 | Koller | Jan 1940 | A |
2240035 | Catherall | Apr 1941 | A |
2243555 | Faus | May 1941 | A |
2245268 | Goss et al. | Jun 1941 | A |
2269149 | Edgar | Jan 1942 | A |
2286897 | Costa et al. | Jun 1942 | A |
2296754 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1942 | A |
2315045 | Breitenstein | Mar 1943 | A |
2316616 | Powell | Apr 1943 | A |
2327748 | Smith | Aug 1943 | A |
2337248 | Koller | Dec 1943 | A |
2337249 | Koller | Dec 1943 | A |
2362151 | Ostenberg | Nov 1944 | A |
2389298 | Ellis | Nov 1945 | A |
2401887 | Sheppard | Jun 1946 | A |
2409857 | Hines et al. | Oct 1946 | A |
2414653 | Lokholder | Jan 1947 | A |
2426322 | Pridham | Aug 1947 | A |
2438231 | Shultz | Mar 1948 | A |
2471634 | Vennice | May 1949 | A |
2472127 | Slason | Jun 1949 | A |
2475200 | Roys | Jul 1949 | A |
2475456 | Norlander | Jul 1949 | A |
2483895 | Fisher | Oct 1949 | A |
2508305 | Teetor | May 1950 | A |
2513226 | Wylie | Jun 1950 | A |
2514927 | Bernhard | Jul 1950 | A |
2520828 | Bertschi | Aug 1950 | A |
2540796 | Stanton | Feb 1951 | A |
2544077 | Gardner | Mar 1951 | A |
2565624 | Phelon | Aug 1951 | A |
2570625 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
2640955 | Fisher | Jun 1953 | A |
2690349 | Teetor | Sep 1954 | A |
2694164 | Geppelt | Nov 1954 | A |
2694613 | Williams | Nov 1954 | A |
2701158 | Schmitt | Feb 1955 | A |
2722617 | Cluwen et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2740946 | Geneslay | Apr 1956 | A |
2770759 | Ahlgren | Nov 1956 | A |
2787719 | Thomas | Apr 1957 | A |
2820411 | Park | Jan 1958 | A |
2825863 | Krupen | Mar 1958 | A |
2837366 | Loeb | Jun 1958 | A |
2842688 | Martin | Jul 1958 | A |
2853331 | Teetor | Sep 1958 | A |
2888291 | Scott et al. | May 1959 | A |
2896991 | Martin, Jr. | Jul 1959 | A |
2900592 | Baruch | Aug 1959 | A |
2935352 | Heppner | May 1960 | A |
2935353 | Loeb | May 1960 | A |
2936437 | Fraser et al. | May 1960 | A |
2959747 | Challacombe et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
2962318 | Teetor | Nov 1960 | A |
3024374 | Stauder | Mar 1962 | A |
3055999 | Lucas | Sep 1962 | A |
3089986 | Gauthier | May 1963 | A |
3100292 | Warner, Jr. et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3102205 | Combs | Aug 1963 | A |
3102314 | Alderfer | Sep 1963 | A |
3105153 | James, Jr. | Sep 1963 | A |
3149255 | Trench | Sep 1964 | A |
3151902 | Ahlgren | Oct 1964 | A |
3204995 | Teetor | Sep 1965 | A |
3208296 | Baermann | Sep 1965 | A |
3238399 | Johanees et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3273104 | Krol | Sep 1966 | A |
3288511 | Tavano | Nov 1966 | A |
3301091 | Reese | Jan 1967 | A |
3351368 | Sweet | Nov 1967 | A |
3382386 | Schlaeppi | May 1968 | A |
3408104 | Raynes | Oct 1968 | A |
3414309 | Tresemer | Dec 1968 | A |
3425729 | Bisbing | Feb 1969 | A |
2932545 | Foley | Apr 1969 | A |
3468576 | Beyer et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3474366 | Barney | Oct 1969 | A |
3496871 | Stengel | Feb 1970 | A |
3500090 | Baermann | Mar 1970 | A |
3521216 | Tolegian | Jul 1970 | A |
3645650 | Laing | Feb 1972 | A |
3668670 | Andersen | Jun 1972 | A |
3684992 | Huguet et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3690393 | Guy | Sep 1972 | A |
3696251 | Last et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3696258 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3707924 | Barthalon et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3790197 | Parker | Feb 1974 | A |
3791309 | Baermann | Feb 1974 | A |
3802034 | Bookless | Apr 1974 | A |
3803433 | Ingenito | Apr 1974 | A |
3808577 | Mathauser | Apr 1974 | A |
3836801 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3845430 | Petkewicz et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3893059 | Nowak | Jul 1975 | A |
3976316 | Laby | Aug 1976 | A |
4079558 | Forham | Mar 1978 | A |
4114305 | Wohlert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4115040 | Knorr | Sep 1978 | A |
4117431 | Eicher | Sep 1978 | A |
4129187 | Wengryn et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4129846 | Yablochnikov | Dec 1978 | A |
4140932 | Wohlert | Feb 1979 | A |
4209905 | Gillings | Jul 1980 | A |
4222489 | Hutter | Sep 1980 | A |
4232535 | Caldwell | Nov 1980 | A |
4296394 | Ragheb | Oct 1981 | A |
4340833 | Sudo et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4363980 | Petersen | Dec 1982 | A |
4399595 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4416127 | Gomez-Olea Naveda | Nov 1983 | A |
4421118 | Dow et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4451811 | Hoffman | May 1984 | A |
4453294 | Morita | Jun 1984 | A |
4454426 | Benson | Jun 1984 | A |
4460855 | Kelly | Jul 1984 | A |
4500827 | Merritt et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4517483 | Hucker et al. | May 1985 | A |
4535278 | Asakawa | Aug 1985 | A |
4547756 | Miller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4629131 | Podell | Dec 1986 | A |
4645283 | MacDonald et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649925 | Dow et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4680494 | Grosjean | Jul 1987 | A |
4767378 | Obermann | Aug 1988 | A |
4785816 | Dow et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4808955 | Godkin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4814654 | Gerfast | Mar 1989 | A |
4837539 | Baker | Jun 1989 | A |
4849749 | Fukamachi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856631 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4912727 | Schubert | Mar 1990 | A |
4924123 | Hamajima et al. | May 1990 | A |
4941236 | Sherman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956625 | Cardone et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4980593 | Edmundson | Dec 1990 | A |
4993950 | Mensor, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996457 | Hawsey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5013949 | Mabe, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5020625 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050276 | Pemberton | Sep 1991 | A |
5062855 | Rincoe | Nov 1991 | A |
5123843 | Van der Zel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139383 | Polyak et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5179307 | Porter | Jan 1993 | A |
5190325 | Doss-Desouza | Mar 1993 | A |
5302929 | Kovacs | Apr 1994 | A |
5309680 | Kiel | May 1994 | A |
5345207 | Gebele | Sep 1994 | A |
5347186 | Konotchick | Sep 1994 | A |
5349258 | Leupold et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5367891 | Furuyama | Nov 1994 | A |
5383049 | Carr | Jan 1995 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5396140 | Goldie et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5425763 | Stemmann | Jun 1995 | A |
5434549 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440997 | Crowley | Aug 1995 | A |
5452663 | Berdut | Sep 1995 | A |
5461386 | Knebelkamp | Oct 1995 | A |
5485435 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492572 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495221 | Post | Feb 1996 | A |
5512732 | Yagnik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5570084 | Ritter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582522 | Johnson | Dec 1996 | A |
5604960 | Good | Feb 1997 | A |
5631093 | Perry et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631618 | Trumper et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633555 | Ackermann et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635889 | Stelter | Jun 1997 | A |
5637972 | Randall et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650681 | DeLerno | Jul 1997 | A |
5730155 | Allen | Mar 1998 | A |
5759054 | Spadafore | Jun 1998 | A |
5788493 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5789878 | Kroeker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818132 | Konotchick | Oct 1998 | A |
5852393 | Reznik et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5902185 | Kubiak et al. | May 1999 | A |
5921357 | Starkovich et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935155 | Humayun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956778 | Godoy | Sep 1999 | A |
5975714 | Vetorino et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983406 | Meyerrose | Nov 1999 | A |
5988336 | Wendt et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000484 | Zoretich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039759 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040642 | Ishiyama | Mar 2000 | A |
6047456 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072251 | Markle | Jun 2000 | A |
6074420 | Eaton | Jun 2000 | A |
6104108 | Hazelton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115849 | Meyerrose | Sep 2000 | A |
6118271 | Ely et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120283 | Cousins | Sep 2000 | A |
6125955 | Zoretich et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142779 | Siegel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157100 | Mielke | Dec 2000 | A |
6170131 | Shin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181110 | Lampis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187041 | Garonzik | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188147 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205012 | Lear | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210033 | Karkos, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224374 | Mayo | May 2001 | B1 |
6234833 | Tsai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6273918 | Yuhasz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275778 | Shimada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285097 | Hazelton et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313551 | Hazelton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313552 | Boast | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6387096 | Hyde, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6422533 | Harms | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457179 | Prendergast | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467326 | Garrigus | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478681 | Overaker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517560 | Toth et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540515 | Tanaka | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561815 | Schmidt | May 2003 | B1 |
6599321 | Hyde, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607304 | Lake et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6608540 | Hones et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652278 | Honkura et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653919 | Shih-Chung et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6720698 | Galbraith | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747537 | Mosteller | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768230 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6821126 | Neidlein | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841910 | Gery | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842332 | Rubenson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847134 | Frissen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850139 | Dettmann et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862748 | Prendergast | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913471 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927657 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936937 | Tu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950279 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952060 | Goldner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954938 | Emberty et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954968 | Sitbon | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6971147 | Halstead | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7009874 | Deak | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016492 | Pan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031160 | Tillotson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033400 | Currier | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065860 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066739 | McLeish | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066778 | Kretzschmar | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7097461 | Neidlein | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101374 | Hyde, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134452 | Hiroshi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135792 | Devaney et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137727 | Joseph et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186265 | Sharkawy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224252 | Meadow, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7264479 | Lee | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7276025 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309934 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311526 | Rohrbach et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339790 | Baker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344380 | Neidlein et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351066 | DiFonzo et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7358724 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362018 | Kulogo et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7364433 | Neidlein | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381181 | Lau et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402175 | Azar | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416414 | Bozzone et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7438726 | Erb | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444683 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453341 | Hildenbrand | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7467948 | Lindberg et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7498914 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7583500 | Ligtenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7628173 | Rosko et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637746 | Lindberg et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645143 | Rohrbach et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658613 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7688036 | Yarger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7762817 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775567 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796002 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799281 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808349 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7812697 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817004 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828556 | Rodrigues | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7832897 | Ku | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837032 | Smeltzer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839246 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843297 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868721 | Fullerton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871272 | Firman, II et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874856 | Schriefer et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7901216 | Rohrbach et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7903397 | McCoy | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905626 | Shantha et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7980268 | Rosko et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7997906 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002585 | Zhou | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004792 | Biskeborn et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009001 | Cleveland | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8050714 | Fadell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078224 | Fadell et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078776 | Novotney et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8087939 | Rohrbach et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8138868 | Arnold | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138869 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8143982 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8143983 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8165634 | Fadell et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8177560 | Rohrbach et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8179219 | Fullerton | May 2012 | B2 |
8187006 | Rudisill et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190205 | Fadell et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8242868 | Lauder et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253518 | Lauder et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264310 | Lauder et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264314 | Sankar | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271038 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271705 | Novotney et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8297367 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8344836 | Lauder et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348678 | Hardisty et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8354767 | Pennander et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8390411 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8390412 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8390413 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395465 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8398409 | Schmidt | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435042 | Rohrbach et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454372 | Lee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467829 | Fadell et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8497753 | DiFonzo et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8514042 | Lauder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535088 | Gao et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8576031 | Lauder et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8576034 | Bilbrey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8586410 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8616362 | Browne et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8648679 | Lauder et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8664044 | Jin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8665045 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690582 | Rohrbach et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702316 | DiFonzo et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8734024 | Isenhour et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8752200 | Varshavsky et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757893 | Isenhour et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8770857 | DiFonzo et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774577 | Benjamin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781273 | Benjamin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020125977 | VanZoest | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030170976 | Molla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179880 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187510 | Hyde | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003487 | Reiter | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040155748 | Steingroever | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040244636 | Meadow et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251759 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050102802 | Sitbon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050196484 | Khoshnevis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231046 | Aoshima | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240263 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050263549 | Scheiner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060066428 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111191 | Wise | May 2006 | A1 |
20060189259 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198047 | Xue et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214756 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290451 | Prendergast et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293762 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072476 | Milan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075594 | Sadler | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103266 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138806 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070255400 | Parravicini et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267929 | Pulnikov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080139261 | Cho et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181804 | Tanigawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186683 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218299 | Arnold | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224806 | Ogden et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272868 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282517 | Claro | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021333 | Fiedler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058201 | Brennvall | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091195 | Hyde et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090146508 | Peng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167727 | Liu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209173 | Arledge et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090230786 | Liu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250576 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251256 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254196 | Cox et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278642 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289090 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289749 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292371 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100033280 | Bird et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100084928 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100126857 | Polwart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100167576 | Zhou | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110026203 | Ligtenberg et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110190060 | Ketabdar | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210636 | Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216030 | Lee | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227869 | Lai et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234344 | Fullerton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248806 | Michael | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279206 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120007704 | Nerl | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120084051 | Hackner | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120085753 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120235519 | Dyer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120262261 | Sarai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130186209 | Herbst | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186473 | Mankame et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186807 | Browne et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187538 | Herbst | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130192860 | Puzio et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207758 | Browne et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252375 | Yi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130256274 | Faulkner | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279060 | Nehl | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305705 | AC et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130341137 | Mandame et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001745 | Lehmann et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140044972 | Menassa et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072261 | Isenhour et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140152252 | Wood et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140205235 | Benjamin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221741 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150253908 | Go | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1615573 | May 2005 | CN |
2938782 | Apr 1981 | DE |
0 345 554 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 545 737 | Jun 1993 | EP |
823395 | Jan 1938 | FR |
1 495 677 | Dec 1977 | GB |
60-091011 | May 1985 | JP |
WO-0231945 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-2007081830 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2009124030 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010141324 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kim, Pill Soo, Kim, Yong, Field and Thermal Modeling of Magnetizing Fixture by Impulse, Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2003. The fifth conference on, Dec. 2003,1301-1306. |
Adam Flaherty “Make: Magnetic Appcessories with Andrea Bianchi” posted Oct. 29, 2012, http://makenzine.com/2012/10/29/magnetic-appcessories-with-andrea-bianchi (downloaded Dec. 9, 2013). |
Jason Desbonnet “Random Tech Stuff: Arduino to Android IO on the cheap (aka Poor Man's NFC” May 1, 2011, http://jbesbonnet.blogspot.com/2011—05—01—archive.html (downloaded Dec. 9, 2013). |
Series BNS, Compatible Series AES Safety Controllers, http://www.schmersalusa.com/safety—controllers/drawings/aes.pdf, pp. 159-175, date unknown. |
BNS 33 Range, Magnetic safety sensors, Rectangular design, http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/36449.pdf, 3 pages, date unknown. |
Series BNS-B20, Coded-Magnet Sensor Safety Door Handle, http://www.schmersalusa.com/catalog—pdfs/BNS—B20.pdf, 2 pages, date unknown. |
Series BNS333, Coded-Magnet Sensors with Integral Safety Control Module, http://www.schmersalusa.com/machine—guarding/coded—magnet/drawings/bns333.pdf, 2 pages, date unknown. |
Wikipedia, “Barker Code”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2, 2008, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Kasami Code”, Web article, last modified Jun. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Linear feedback shift register”, Web article, last modified Nov. 11, 2008, 6 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Golomb Ruler”, Web article, last modified Nov. 4, 2008, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Costas Array”, Web article, last modified Oct. 7, 2008, 4 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Walsh Code”, Web article, last modified Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Gold Code”, Web article, last modified Jul. 27, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Bitter Electromagnet”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2011,1 page. |
Pill-soo Kim, “A future cost trends of magnetizer systems in Korea”, Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, 1996, vol. 2, Aug. 5, 1996, pp. 991-996. |
United States Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270. |
United States Office Action, dated Mar. 12, 2012, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270. |
United States Office Action, dated Feb. 22, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952. |
United States Office Action, dated Oct. 12, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952. |
United States Office Action, dated Mar. 9, 2012, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,280. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 14, 2009, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/038925. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 13, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/021612. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2009, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/002027. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 18, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/036443. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2011 issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/049410. |
Atallah, K., Calverley, S.D., D. Howe, 2004, “Design, analysis and realisation of a high-performance magnetic gear”, IEE Proc.-Electr. Power Appl., vol. 151, No. 2, Mar. 2004. |
Atallah, K., Howe, D. 2001, “A Novel High-Performance Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 4, Jul. 2001, p. 2844-46. |
Bassani, R., 2007, “Dynamic Stability of Passive Magnetic Bearings”, Nonlinear Dynamics, V. 50, p. 161-68. |
Boston Gear 221S-4, One-stage Helical Gearbox, http://www.bostongear.com/pdf/product—sections/200—series—helical.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Charpentier et al., 2001, “Mechanical Behavior of Axially Magnetized Permanent-Magnet Gears”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 3, May 2001, p. 1110-17. |
Chau et al., 2008, “Transient Analysis of Coaxial Magnetic Gears Using Finite Element Comodeling”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103. |
Choi et al., 2010, “Optimization of Magnetization Directions in a 3-D Magnetic Structure”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 46, No. 6, Jun. 2010, p. 1603-06. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Innovative Magnetics Research in Huntsville”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4m81JjZCJo. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Non-Contact Attachment Utilizing Permanent Magnets”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUm25CNNgQ. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2010, Company Website, http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com. |
Furlani 1996, “Analysis and optimization of synchronous magnetic couplings”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, No. 8, p. 4692. |
Furlani 2001, “Permanent Magnet and Electromechanical Devices”, Academic Press, San Diego. |
Furlani, E.P., 2000, “Analytical analysis of magnetically coupled multipole cylinders”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 33, No. 1, p. 28-33. |
General Electric DP 2.7 Wind Turbine Gearbox, http://www.gedrivetrain.com/insideDP27.cfm, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Ha et al., 2002, “Design and Characteristic Analysis of Non-Contact Magnet Gear for Conveyor by Using Permanent Magnet”, Conf. Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 1922-27. |
Huang et al., 2008, “Development of a Magnetic Planetary Gearbox”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, No. 3, p. 403-12. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US12/61938 dated Feb. 26, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/028095 dated May 13, 2013. |
Jian et al., “Comparison of Coaxial Magnetic Gears With Different Topologies”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 2009, p. 4526-29. |
Jian, L., Chau, K.T., 2010, “A Coaxial Magnetic Gear With Halbach Permanent-Magnet Arrays”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 25, No. 2, Jun. 2010, p. 319-28. |
Jørgensen et al., “The Cycloid Permanent Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 44, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2008, p. 1659-65. |
Jørgensen et al., 2005, “Two dimensional model of a permanent magnet spur gear”, Conf. Record of the 2005 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 261-5. |
Krasil'nikov et al., 2008, “Calculation of the Shear Force of Highly Coercive Permanent Magnets in Magnetic Systems With Consideration of Affiliation to a Certain Group Based on Residual Induction”, Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 44, Nos. 7-8, p. 362-65. |
Krasil'nikov et al., 2009, “Torque Determination for a Cylindrical Magnetic Clutch”, Russian Engineering Research, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 544-547. |
Liu et al., 2009, “Design and Analysis of Interior-magnet Outer-rotor Concentric Magnetic Gears”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105. |
Lorimer, W., Hartman, A., 1997, “Magnetization Pattern for Increased Coupling in Magnetic Clutches”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, No. 5, Sep. 1997. |
Mezani, S., Atallah, K., Howe, D. , 2006, “A high-performance axial-field magnetic gear”, Journal of Applied Physics vol. 99. |
Mi, “Magnetreater/Charger Model 580” Magnetic Instruments Inc. Product specification, May 4, 2009, http://web.archive.org/web/20090504064511/http://www.maginst.com/specifications/580—magnetreater.htm, 2 pages. |
Neugart PLE-160, One-Stage Planetary Gearbox, http://www.neugartusa.com/ple—160—gb.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/471,189 dated Apr. 3, 2013. |
Tsurumoto 1992, “Basic Analysis on Transmitted Force of Magnetic Gear Using Permanent Magnet”, IEEE Translation Journal on Magnetics in Japan, Vo 7, No. 6, Jun. 1992, p. 447-52. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,393 dated Apr. 4, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/236,413 dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/374,074 dated Feb. 21, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,520 dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/530,893 dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,519 dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Aug. 8, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,219 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
C. Pompermaier, L. Sjoberg, and G. Nord, Design and Optimization of a Permanent Magnet Transverse Flux Machine, XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines, Sep. 2012, p. 606, IEEE Catalog No. CFP1290B-PRT, ISBN: 978-1-4673-0143-5. |
V. Rudnev, An Objective Assessment of Magnetic Flux Concentrators, Heat Treating Progress, Nov./Dec. 2004, p. 19-23. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140184505 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61746456 | Dec 2012 | US |