1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a magnetically tunable filter.
2. Related Technology
Magnetically tunable filters are employed, for example, as variable bandpass filters in spectrum analyzers and network analyzers, the desired resonant frequency being adjusted by means of an external variable magnetic field.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,888,569 discloses a variable bandpass filter for frequencies within a frequency range of at most one waveguide band, for example 50-75 GHz, with four resonator spheres. The variable bandpass filter comprises an input waveguide, an output waveguide and a transfer waveguide, which are configured for the propagation of a TE10 wave mode. The end of the input waveguide terminated by a short-circuit wall, the start of the output waveguide which is likewise provided with a short-circuit wall, and the transfer waveguide fitted below the input waveguide and the output waveguide in the direction of the externally applied homogeneous magnetic field, is arranged during operation between two magnet poles which supply a variable magnetic field for adjusting a resonant frequency. In the direction of the wave propagation, the input waveguide and output waveguide have a rectangular profile which has a much smaller cross-sectional area in the coupling region than at the connection flange. The coupling region of the variable bandpass filter comprises the four resonator spheres, fitted close to a short-circuit wall, and respectively the tapered ends of the input waveguide and of the output waveguide, as well as the transfer waveguide with a constant cross-sectional area.
A disadvantage of the variable bandpass filter described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,888,569 is that in the resonant case the field distribution of the wave to be extracted is unfavourable in the coupling region, since it is guided in a waveguide whose profile is reduced towards the coupling region perpendicularly to the propagation direction of the wave to be extracted. This causes undesired reflections which are destructively superposed and therefore reduce the amount of energy transported by the incoming wave. This effect also pertains to the outgoing wave in the output waveguide, which now has a defined frequency, so that overall the insertion loss in relation to the entry of the input waveguide and the exit of the output waveguide is increased since the field distributions in the coupling region are perturbed owing to the tapering geometry of the waveguides.
Another disadvantage is the limited bandwidth of the waveguide concept.
Therefore, the invention provides a magnetically tunable filter for high frequencies, which has an insertion loss being as low as possible in the resonant case and which has very high isolation of the filter input and the filter output in the off-resonance case.
The invention provides a magnetically tunable filter having a filter housing and two tunable resonator spheres comprising magnetizable material and arranged next to one another in two filter branches, each filter branch comprising a coplanar line arranged on a substrate layer and extending in the direction of an electrical connection, the two filter branches being connected by a common coupling opening and a resonator sphere respectively being positioned on each side of the coupling opening inside the two filter branches.
The magnetically tunable filter according to the invention comprises a filter housing and two tunable resonator spheres made of magnetisable material. These are arranged next to one another in two filter branches, each filter branch comprising a coplanar line formed on a substrate layer and extending in the direction of an electrical connection, i.e. in the direction of the signal input or in the direction of the signal output. The two filter branches are connected to one another by a common coupling opening, and they have a common filter housing. On either side of the coupling opening, the resonator spheres are arranged on each side inside the two filter branches.
The advantages achieved by the invention are in particular that the magnetically tunable filter according to the invention comprises two coplanar lines, so as to ensure good guiding of the incoming electromagnetic wave and the outgoing wave. The coplanar lines do not have a bottom cut-off frequency.
It is furthermore advantageous that the resonator spheres are positioned in the vicinity of a short circuit, since here, over a large frequency range, a magnetic field maximum occurs which is independent of the frequency of the incoming electromagnetic wave. Owing to the coupling structure and the line type of the coplanar line, the working range of the filter according to the invention is relatively wide in respect of the frequency and is therefore very suitable for a frequency range to be filtered, for example from 40 GHz to 75 GHz.
Furthermore, the coplanar lines which are used offer the advantage that they have a defined characteristic impedance so that good coupling of the resonator spheres can be adjusted. The characteristic impedance of the coplanar line in the vicinity of the resonator spheres is also easy to match by using a λ/4 transformer or a taper.
Furthermore, the coplanar line is preferably formed on a substrate whose dielectric constant is as low as possible, in order to keep the wavelength as large as possible in comparison with the diameter of the resonator spheres. A long wavelength in comparison with the diameter of the resonator spheres reduces the excitation of perturbing higher order modes, since the magnetic field distribution in the volume of the resonator spheres is more homogeneous with a long wavelength than with a shorter wavelength.
It is also advantageous for the two coplanar lines to be fully embedded in metal channels, so that they are substantially surrounded by metal walls. In the resonant case, energy transfer is made possible by connecting these channels, or the filter branches, to one another through a coupling opening, the coupling opening being designed differently according to the various exemplary embodiments or optionally comprising irises with geometrically different or differently positioned iris apertures.
A coupling opening partially closed by means of a metal separating wall has the advantage that the resonator spheres do not have any direct line of sight with one another. The height of the separating wall is in this case advantageously selected so that although line of sight between the resonator spheres is prevented, a sufficient coupling factor is nevertheless still ensured. This is a significant difference from all previous concepts.
Both the structure and the functionality of the invention, as well as its further advantages and objects, will however be best understandable with the aid of the following description in conjunction with the associated drawings. In the drawings:
Throughout the figures, parts which correspond to one another are provided with the same references so that repeated description is superfluous.
Each of the two filter branches 4a, 4b contains a coplanar line 7 formed on a substrate layer 5 and extending in the direction of an electrical connection 6, the substrate layer 5, which preferably has a low dielectric constant, being arranged on the metal bottom 10 of the filter branch 4a, 4b. The two adjacent and touching filter branches 4a, 4b are connected to one another through a common coupling opening 8, a resonator sphere 3a, 3b respectively being positioned on each side of the coupling opening 8 above the coplanar line 7 inside the two filter branches 4a, 4b.
The coplanar line 7 comprises two outer line strips 27a, 27b and a central line strip 28, which lie on the same side of the substrate layer 5, away from the metal bottom 10, and have a short-circuit region 31 in the end region 30 of the filter branch 4a, 4b. In the short-circuit region 31, the two outer line strips 27a, 27b and the central line strip 28 are connected conductively to one another by a metal layer. Provided in the short-circuit region 31, there is furthermore a through-contact 35 which conductively connects the metal layer through the substrate layer 5 to the bottom of the filter branch 4a, 4b, or of the filter housing 2.
These waveguide-coupled coplanar lines 7 have the advantage that the fields are concentrated in the vicinity of the central line strip 28 and the nonconductive slots 29a, 29b, the current density in the longitudinal direction having maximum values in the vicinity of the short-circuit region 31. The effect achieved by the coplanar line 7 embedded in the metal filter housing 2 is therefore good and guiding, defined by the line geometry, of the electromagnetic wave to be transported.
The dashed lines which extend parallel to the signal input 6a and the signal output 6b, respectively, each indicate a second thin separating wall 19 which in this second exemplary embodiment of the magnetically tunable filter according to the invention is additional relative to the exemplary embodiment shown in
In this side view, it may be seen that the height 11 of the first separating wall 9 is less than the total height 12 of the filter housing 2, or of the filter branch 4a, 4b, so that this first separating wall 9 prevents direct line of sight between the two resonator spheres 3a, 3b which are arranged on either side of the first separating wall 9.
Between a lid 16 of the filter housing 2 and an upper edge 17 of the first separating wall 9, which extends inside and parallel to the coupling opening 8 and whose length 13 corresponds to the length 14 of the coupling opening 8, there is therefore a first quadrilateral gap 18.
In an additional embodiment of the magnetically tunable filter according to the invention (not further represented), instead of the first separating wall 9 inside the common coupling opening 8 of the filter branches 4a, 4b, it is also possible to fit an iris which extends from the bottom 10 of the filter housing 2 as far as the lid 16 of the filter housing 2 and has an arbitrarily shaped and positioned iris aperture. The iris aperture may for example be circular, elliptical, rectangular, triangular, or have the shape of a polygon.
The second separating wall 19 is provided inside the filter branches 4a, 4b and respectively stands perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction of the coplanar line 7 and the first separating wall 9, the length 21 of the second separating wall 19 corresponding to the width 22 of a filter branch 4a, 4b and being positioned inside one filter branch 4a approximately in the vicinity of a short-circuit wall 20b of the neighbouring filter branch 4b, which may be seen clearly in the plan view of
It may furthermore be seen from
The coplanar line 7, which for example has a characteristic impedance of 50 Ω, is formed on a substrate layer 5 which has a preferably low dielectric constant. The sphere diameter of the resonator spheres 3a, 3b, i.e. for example 300 μm, is therefore much less than the wavelength of the incoming and outgoing waves. The excitation of perturbing higher order modes is therefore reduced, since the magnetic field distribution in the sphere volume is more homogeneous with a long wavelength than with a wavelength whose dimension is only a little larger than the sphere diameter of the resonator spheres 3a, 3b. The first separating wall 9 between the two resonator spheres 3a, 3bprevents direct coupling of stray fields in the vicinity of the resonator spheres 3a, 3b, so that high decoupling is obtained away from resonance.
In the short-circuit region of the filter branch 4a, it may now be seen clearly that the through-contact 35 connects the metal layer of the coplanar line 7 to the metal bottom 10 of the filter branch 4a.
The invention is not restricted to the exemplary embodiments represented in the drawings, and in particular not to a filter housing without separating walls. All features described above and represented in the drawing may be combined with one another in any desired way.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 030 882 | Jul 2006 | DE | national |
10 2006 053 416 | Nov 2006 | DE | national |
10 2007 001 832 | Jan 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/005927 | 7/4/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/26/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/003483 | 1/10/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3368169 | Carter et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3400343 | Carter | Sep 1968 | A |
4600906 | Blight | Jul 1986 | A |
4888569 | Nicholson et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5343176 | Hasler | Aug 1994 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090039983 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |