Magnetization device and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9257220
  • Patent Number
    9,257,220
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 5, 2013
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 9, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A magnetizer for a tissue-penetrating medical tool such as a needle, cannula, stylet, or catheter consist of a magnetic flux generator which generates a magnetic field in a tool-receiving space. The tool can be passed through or into and out of the space to magnetize it. Optionally the space can be defined by a disposable plastics tube, with a closed end, so that a defined length of the tool is magnetized. The magnetic flux generator can be a permanent magnet or electromagnet. Alternatively a conveyor belt can be used to transport a tissue-penetrating medical tool through a magnetic field generated by an electromagnet with the belt and the electromagnetic being controlled in response to an optical sensor for detecting the position of the tissue-penetrating medical tool. The device is suitable for magnetizing tools for use in surgical procedures where the tool is to be magnetically tracked.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the field of medical devices and in particular to a device and method for magnetizing a tissue-penetrating medical tool.


BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW

Unless explicitly indicated herein, the materials described in this section are not admitted to be prior art.


There are numerous medical procedures that involve the insertion of a medical tool or instrument, such as a needle, cannula, catheter or stylet, into a subject's body, e.g. minimally-invasive surgical procedures, local anaesthesia, detection of bio-electrical signals, electrical stimulation for diagnosis or treatment, vascular access, fine needle aspiration, musculoskeletal injections and so on. In such procedures it is generally necessary to guide the medical tool properly to the desired position in the subject's body and it can also be beneficial to monitor or track the medical tool position to ensure that it remains at the desired location. In general it is very difficult for the user to determine the exact position of the tip of the medical tool and thus to be sure whether it is in the desired place, for example adjacent a nerve, or whether it has undesirably penetrated something else, for example a blood vessel.


It has been proposed to use x-ray techniques for needle guidance by providing the clinician with an x-ray image of the needle in the body. However in view of the risks associated with exposure to electromagnetic radiation, it is not possible to provide continuous guidance during insertion of the medical tool and so a series of snapshots are relied upon, which does not give optimal guidance.


More recently the use of ultrasound imaging to guide needle and catheterisation procedures has been proposed. Ultrasound imaging is advantageous compared to x-ray techniques because of the lack of exposure to electromagnetic radiation, and ultrasound probes are easily manipulable to image many different parts of the body. However ultrasound imaging has two main challenges: firstly that the interpretation of ultrasound images is rather difficult, and secondly that needles do not show-up particularly reliably or visibly in the ultrasound image.


As to the problem of needle visibility, the ultrasound image acquisition plane is thin—of the order of 1 mm thick, and so if the needle is out of that plane it will not be imaged. Further, even when the needle is in the imaging plane, because the echogenicity of standard needles is poor at high angles of incidence, the needle may not be particularly visible. It has been proposed to produce echogenic needles which make the needle more visible to ultrasound imaging devices. However these only help when the needle is well-aligned with the imaging plane. Similarly techniques for image processing and ultrasound beam steering help only when the needle is well-aligned with the imaging plane and do not work well for angles of incidence greater than 45 degrees.


Various needle tracking technologies have been proposed based either on a needle guide fitted to an ultrasound probe, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,690,159 B2 or WO-A-2012/040077, or based on the transmission and reception of electromagnetic information, e.g. US-A-2007-027390), but these have functional and accuracy limitations which means that the needle tip position is not exactly known in every clinical circumstance. Typical accuracies are of the order of 2 mm, which can mean the difference between the needle tip being inside or outside a nerve. Further they often require the use of heavily modified or new equipment which is unwelcome to clinicians and to institutions with relatively rigid purchasing regimes.


Most often, therefore, practitioners rely on their skill and experience to judge where the tip of the medical instrument is as it is inserted. They may rely on sound, the touch and feel of the physical resistance to the medical tool and sudden changes in resistance, and changes in resistance to the injection of air or fluids. Developing this level of skill and experience is time-consuming and difficult and as there is an anatomical variation from patient to patient, the procedures inevitably entail some risks.


More recently it has been proposed to utilise magnetic tracking of a needle or other tissue-penetrating tool using a magnetometric detector attached to a freehand ultrasound probe and using a magnetised tissue-penetrating tool. Such a technique is described in our co-pending International patent application no. PCT/EP2011/065420. In this system a standard freehand ultrasound probe has a magnetometric detector attached to it, the detector comprising an array of magnetometric sensors. The sensors detect the magnetic field from the magnetised tissue-penetrating medical tool and send their readings of the magnetic field to a base station. The base station includes a data processor for calculating from the measurements the relative position and orientation of the tissue-penetrating medical tool relative to the ultrasound probe. The base station can supply this calculated position and orientation to the ultrasound imaging system so that the tissue-penetrating medical tool can be displayed on the ultrasound image of the subject's anatomy.


The system is advantageous in that it allows the operator to see both the ultrasound imaged anatomy and the magnetically detected tissue-penetrating medical tool on the same image. This enables greater accuracy in the procedure. Further, the attachment of a magnetometric detector to the ultrasound probe does not alter the feel of the ultrasound probe significantly, and it remains, therefore, familiar to the practitioner. Similarly the magnetization of the tissue-penetrating medical tool does not alter its physical characteristics, again, preserving the familiarity and experience of the clinician. The system is also simple and cheap compared to optical or electromagnetic tracking technologies and because the ultrasound probe can be manipulated freely, the ease-of-use of the freehand ultrasound system is preserved.


The system requires, however, that the tissue-penetrating medical tool is reliably and consistently magnetised.


Accordingly the present invention provides a device and method for magnetising a tissue-penetrating medical tool. In particular at least part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool is magnetically saturated by the magnetization device and method. The device and method preserve the sterility of the tool while reliably magnetising the tool to the extent necessary. The device and method may also be adapted to magnetise a defined length of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.


In more detail one embodiment of the invention provides a device for magnetizing a tissue-penetrating medical tool comprising a tool-receiving space for receiving at least part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool; a magnetic flux generator generating a magnetic field, the magnetic field having a magnetization region for magnetically-saturating the part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool which is in said tool-receiving space, the magnetic flux in the magnetization region being oriented in a direction substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.


Another aspect of the invention provides a method of magnetising a tissue-penetrating medical tool comprising: positioning at least part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool in a tool-receiving space; generating a magnetic field in said tool-receiving space to magnetically-saturate the part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool which is in said tool-receiving space, the magnetic flux in the magnetization region being oriented in a direction substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.


Preferably the tool receiving space is adapted to permit movement of the tissue-penetrating medical tool in a movement direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool. Preferably the tool-receiving space is adapted to admit a predefined length of the tissue-penetrating medical tool, and more preferably to allow it to be moved into and out of the tool-receiving space in opposing movement directions. The tool-receiving space may have a longitudinal axis substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tool and substantially parallel to the magnetic flux in the magnetisation region.


The magnetic flux generator may be provided on one side of the tool-receiving space. More preferably the magnetic flux generator is provided on two sides of the tool-receiving space. Alternatively the magnetic flux generator may surround the tool-receiving space, e.g. by having a cylindrical configuration.


The magnetic flux generator may comprise a stationary part and a movable part, the stationary part generating a magnetic field extending through the magnetization region and the moveable part being movable towards and away from the magnetization space so that its magnetic field is selectively applied to the magnetization region. The movable part of the magnetic flux generator may comprise a plurality of magnets positioned along a direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool. The plurality of magnets may have alternating pole orientations. Preferably the plurality of magnets comprise a first set of magnets with alternating poles on one side of the magnetization region and a second set of magnets on the opposite side of the magnetization region, the second set of magnets having the same pole orientations as the first set.


Preferably the movable part of the magnetic flux generator is movable towards and away from the magnetization region in a direction transverse to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.


The tool receiving space may be constituted by a longitudinally-extending space.


The magnetic flux generator may be a permanent magnet or electromagnet.


A conveyor belt may be provided to convey a tissue-penetrating medical tool through the magnetization region in the tool-receiving space. Where an electromagnetic and conveyor belt are used together, the electromagnetic may be controlled to vary the strength and/or direction of the magnetic flux in the magnetization region as the tissue-penetrating tool passes through the magnetization region. Preferably an optical sensor is provided to detect the position of the tissue-penetrating tool as it passes through the magnetization region.


The tool-receiving space may have one open end for receiving the tool and a closed end, the length of the tool-receiving space thus defining a length of tissue-penetrating medical tool which is within the magnetization region.


The tool-receiving space may comprise a sterile liner such as a disposable drape and/or disposable plastics tube. The disposable plastics tube may be a standard needle or cannula cover.


In one embodiment the device is sterile and, optionally, disposable.


The device is preferably hand-held and optionally is provided with a guard extending around the entrance to the tool-receiving space to protect the user's hand. The guard may be a plastics shroud or protective lip.


The tissue-penetrating medical tool can be a needle, cannula, stylet, or the like.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be further described by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a first embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a second embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a third embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 schematically illustrates a fourth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a fifth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 schematically illustrates a sixth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7 schematically illustrates a seventh embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 8 schematically illustrates an eighth embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a first embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 1 the tissue-penetrating medical tool is a hypodermic needle 5A forming part of a hypodermic syringe 5. The magnetization device comprises a magnetic flux generator 10, which can be a permanent magnet or electromagnet, which generates magnetic flux in a magnetization region 12 in a tool-receiving space 11 through which the hypodermic syringe 5 can be passed. The magnetic field generated in the magnetization region 11 is sufficiently strong to saturate the magnetic properties of the metallic needle 5A. In this embodiment the tool is passed over one pole of the magnetic flux generator, in one direction only, magnetising the entire length of the tool 5A.


Advantages of this embodiment are that it is simple and easy to use and that the needle 5A can remain in its sterile package while being magnetised.



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a second embodiment of the invention which is similar to that of FIG. 1 but in which the magnetic flux generator 10, 20 extends around the tool-receiving space 11 and magnetization region 12. This can be achieved by providing a second permanent magnet 20 on the opposite side of the tool-receiving space 11, or by using a cylindrical permanent magnet surrounding the tool-receiving space 11 with its longitudinal axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A. Alternatively the magnets 10 and 20 can be replaced by one or more electromagnets. It should be noted that in the case of using two permanent magnets 10 and 20 the magnets are oriented with their poles in opposite directions such that like poles face each other across the tool-receiving space 11. This creates a magnetic field in the tool-receiving space 11 which is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A.


In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the entire hypodermic syringe 5 can be passed through the tool-receiving space 11 in one direction, resulting in magnetization of the entire length of the needle 5A.


As with the first embodiment the magnetic flux generator generates a field which is sufficient to saturate the magnetic properties of the metallic tool 5A. The second embodiment has advantages over the first embodiment that a stronger magnetic field can be generated in the magnetization region which gives more consistent magnetization of the tool.



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a third embodiment of the invention. In the FIG. 3 device the magnetizer comprises a magnetic flux generator formed from two permanent magnets 30 and 32, or alternatively one cylindrical magnet or an electromagnet arrangement which defines a cylindrical tool-receiving space 11. The magnetic flux generator 30, 32 generates a magnetic field in the tool-receiving space 11 which thus constitutes a magnetization region 12 and the magnetic field is oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tool-receiving space 11.


The magnetizer device also includes a sterile plastics tube 34, which can be the same type of tube as commonly used as a disposable needle cover, and, in addition, a flexible sterile drape 33 may be provided which covers the magnetic flux generator and extends into the tool-receiving space before the plastics tube 34 is inserted into it. The plastics tube 34 preferably has a bottom wall 35 which forms a dosed end of the tool-receiving space 11.


In use, the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A is passed into the plastics tube 34 until its tip touches the bottom wall 35. This defines a length of the tool which is in the magnetization region 12. After a few seconds the tool is removed and the part of the tool which was in the magnetization region will have been magnetised. As with the embodiments above the magnetic flux generator 30, 32 generates a sufficient strength of magnetic field to saturate the magnetic material of the tool.


The third embodiment has advantages that a strong magnetic field can be generated in the magnetization region and because a defined length of the tool is magnetised, better tracking results can be achieved by the magnetic tracking system.



FIG. 4 illustrates a fourth embodiment of the invention which is similar to the third embodiment except that the whole magnetizer is sterile and thus the flexible sterile drape 33 can be omitted. With the exception of the need to position such a flexible drape in the tool-receiving space before insertion of the plastics tube 34, the use of the FIG. 4 embodiment is the same as that of the FIG. 3 embodiment.



FIG. 5 illustrates a fifth embodiment of the invention. The magnetization device of FIG. 5 comprises a magnetic flux generator formed from two permanent magnets 50 and 51, or alternatively a single cylindrical permanent magnet or electromagnet and a plastics tube 54 defining a tool-receiving space 11 extending through the magnetization region 12 of the magnetic flux generator. As illustrated the plastics tube 54 is longer than the magnetization region 12. The tube 54 can be a sterile plastics tube of the same type as used for needle covers in needle packages. In the FIG. 5 embodiment the tube 54 is open at both ends, but the length of the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A which is magnetised is defined by the position of the magnetic flux generator 50, 51 in relation to the entry end of the tube 54. Thus introducing the exemplified needle 5A into the tube until the body of the syringe contacts the entry end of the tube 54 means that a defined length of the needle 5A from its distal tip is passed through the magnetization region 12.


The magnetic flux generator 50, 51 can be a permanent magnet or magnets which are small and thus of low cost. The device may, therefore, be completely sterile and completely disposable. As with the previous embodiments the magnetic flux generator 50, 51 generates a magnetic field which is strong enough to saturate the magnetic properties of the tool 5A.


The embodiment of FIG. 5 is suitable for inclusion as an integral part of the a medical device package. That is to say the device can be supplied with the tissue-penetrating medical tool extending already into the tool-receiving space 11 so that when the user extracts the device for use, the required defined extent of the tissue-medicating tool 5A is magnetised.



FIG. 6 illustrates a modification applied to the third embodiment described above in which like parts are indicated with the same reference numerals. The FIG. 6 embodiment includes in the magnetic flux generator an additional magnet 60 which is a permanent magnet, with its pole orientation reversed compared to the magnets 30 and 32. The magnet 60 is movable towards and away from the axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A and tool-receiving space 11 transverse to their longitudinal axes. In use the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A is introduced into the tool-receiving space 11 as before and after a few seconds the additional magnet 60 is moved back and forth one or more times before the tool is removed from the magnetization device. The effect of moving the magnet 60 into and then out of the vicinity of the magnetization region 12 is that it sharpens the magnetic pole which is formed in the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A at its proximal end which gives better results in magnetic needle tracking. By “sharpening the pole” is meant that the magnetization of the tissue-penetrating medical tool is restricted more clearly to a defined length, i.e. the magnetization falls-off at the proximal end of the tool. This is achieved by the mini-dipoles in the magnetic material of the tool being aligned by the flux in the magnetisation region but stop aligning abruptly at the proximal end because of the influence of the additional magnet 60. This creates a sharper pole than the spherical pole at the other (tip) end created by the mini-dipoles being aligned right up to the abrupt physical tip of the tool 5.


Although the additional magnet 60 is illustrated as applied to the third embodiment of the invention, it will be appreciated that it can be added to the first, second, fourth or fifth embodiments in just the same way.



FIG. 7 illustrates a seventh embodiment of the invention. This is an enhancement of the FIG. 6 embodiment in that more movable magnets are provided as part of the magnetic flux generator. Thus in this embodiment the fixed magnets 30, 32 are shorter compared to the plastics tube 34, while three additional magnets 71-76 are provided on each side of the remaining extent of the plastics tube 34. The magnets 71-76 are movable towards and away from the tool-receiving space 11 in a direction transverse to the longitudinal axis of the space and the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A. As illustrated the fixed magnets 30 and 32 have like poles facing each other across the tool-receiving space 11 whereas the pairs of magnets 71 and 74, 72 and 75, 73 and 76 which face each other across the tool-receiving space have opposite poles facing each other. In addition, movable magnets down each side of the tool-receiving space 11 have alternating pole orientations. Thus, in the illustrated example, the magnets 71 and 73 have their poles oriented in the same direction as the fixed magnet 32 on the same side of the tool-receiving aperture whereas the magnet 72 between them is oppositely oriented. On the other side of the tool-receiving space 11 the magnets 74 and 76 are oppositely oriented from the fixed magnet 30, while the magnet 75 between them is oriented in the same way as the fixed magnet 30.


The reason for including the alternately oriented magnets 71 to 76 is to introduce multiple poles into the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A and thus effectively “code” the tool so that it can be recognised and identified by the magnetic tracking system. Thus to use the magnetizer device the exemplified needle 5A is passed into the tube 34 until its tip touches the closed bottom 35. After a few second the movable magnets 71 to 76 are moved back and forth once, or more than once, as indicated by the arrows and the needle is then removed from the tube 34. Only the length of the needle which has been in the magnetization region 12 will be magnetised and multiple poles will have been introduced into the needle.


Although the modification of FIG. 7 is illustrated as applied to the FIG. 3 embodiment, it can be applied to the embodiments of FIGS. 1, 2, 4 and 5.



FIG. 8 illustrates a seventh embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 8 the magnetic flux generator is an electromagnetic 80 which can comprise a pair of Helmholtz coils to generate a uniform magnetic field in a magnetization region 12. A conveyor belt 82 is provided to move the tissue-penetrating medical tool such as a needle 5A attached to a syringe 5 through a tool-receiving space 11. An optical sensor 84 is provided to detect the position of the tissue-penetrating medical tool 5A and a control system (not illustrated) is used to control the conveyor belt 82 and electromagnet 80 in response to the optical sensor 84 to switch the magnetic field generated by the electromagnet on or off, or to vary its strength, depending on the position of the tissue-penetrating medical tool. The magnetizer device of FIG. 8 is thus able to magnetise the tool as desired. The tool may be completely and uniformly magnetised, or a defined partial length can be magnetised, and/or the magnetization can be varied along the extent of the tool to provide a coding of the tool.


As with the previous embodiment the electromagnet 80 is controlled to generate a magnetic field which is strong enough to saturate the magnetic properties of the needle.


The embodiment of FIG. 8 is therefore advantageous in being able to create complex coding on any type of magnetisable tissue-penetrating medical tool.


In a variation of the FIG. 8 embodiment, rather than providing a conveyor belt 82, multiple electromagnetic coils 80 may be provided along the length of the needle with the multiple coils being selectively energised to magnetically code the needle.


The magnetizer embodiments of FIGS. 1 to 7 are preferably constructed as hand-held devices with an ergonomic design. A protective lip or shroud may be provided around the entry opening of the tool-receiving space 11 and extending radially outwards from the device to protect the hand of the user as they insert the needle into the tool-receiving space. Such a shroud 40 is illustrated schematically in dotted form in FIG. 4. The shroud or hand guard may be made of rigid of semi-rigid plastics material.


The magnetizer embodiments of FIGS. 1 to 7 may be supplied as part of a pack with tissue-penetrating tools.

Claims
  • 1. A device for magnetizing a tissue-penetrating medical tool comprising: a tool-receiving space having a closed end, an open end, and a sterile liner, and being of a length to receive within the sterile liner at the open end a predefined length of the tissue-penetrating medical tool; anda magnetic flux generator generating a magnetic field, the magnetic field having a magnetization region for magnetically-saturating the part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool which is in said tool-receiving space, the magnetic flux in the magnetization region being oriented in a direction substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.
  • 2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the tool-receiving space is adapted to permit movement of the tissue-penetrating medical tool in the tool-receiving space in a movement direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.
  • 3. The device according to claim 1, wherein the tool-receiving space is adapted to permit movement of the tissue-penetrating medical tool into and out of the tool-receiving space.
  • 4. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic flux generator is provided on one side of the tool-receiving space.
  • 5. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic flux generator is provided on two sides of the tool-receiving space.
  • 6. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic flux generator is provided to surround the tool-receiving space.
  • 7. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic flux generator is adapted to generated magnetic fields oriented perpendicular to each other and extending into the magnetization region.
  • 8. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic flux generator further comprises a movable magnet which can be moved towards and away from the tool-receiving space.
  • 9. The device according to claim 8, wherein plural movable magnets are provided.
  • 10. The device according to claim 9, wherein the plural movable magnets have oppositely oriented poles.
  • 11. The device according to claim 8, wherein the movable magnet is movable transverse to the longitudinal axis of the tool-receiving space.
  • 12. The device according to claim 1, wherein a conveyor belt is provided to convey a tissue-penetrating medical tool into the tool-receiving space.
  • 13. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic flux generator is an electromagnet.
  • 14. The device according to claim 13, further comprising a controller to control the electromagnet to vary at least one of the strength and direction of the magnetic field in the magnetization region.
  • 15. The device according to claim 14, further comprising an optical sensor adapted to detect the position of the tissue-penetrating medical tool and to supply the detected position to the controller.
  • 16. The device according to claim 1, wherein the sterile liner is made from plastics.
  • 17. The device according to claim 1, wherein the sterile liner is disposable.
  • 18. The device according to claim 1, wherein the sterile liner is a needle cover.
  • 19. The device according to claim 1, wherein the sterile liner is a disposable drape.
  • 20. The device according to claim 1, which is sterile.
  • 21. The device according to claim 1, which is disposable.
  • 22. The device according to claim 1, wherein a protective hand guard is provided around the tool-receiving space.
  • 23. The device according to claim 1, including a tissue-penetrating medical tool which is a needle, cannula, stylet or catheter.
  • 24. A method of magnetizing a tissue-penetrating medical tool comprising: positioning at least part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool in a tool-receiving space, the tool-receiving space having a closed end, an open end, and a sterile liner, and being of a length to receive within the sterile liner at the open end a predefined length of the tissue-penetrating medical tool; andgenerating a magnetic field in said tool-receiving space to magnetically-saturate the part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool which is in said tool-receiving space, the magnetic flux in the magnetization region being oriented in a direction substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.
  • 25. The method according to claim 24, further comprising the step of moving the tissue-penetrating medical tool into the tool-receiving space in a movement direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.
  • 26. The method according to claim 24, further comprising the step of moving the tissue-penetrating tool into and out of the tool-receiving space.
  • 27. The method according claim 24, further comprising the step of bringing a movable magnet closer to and further away from the tool-receiving space to modify the magnetization of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.
  • 28. The method according to claim 24, wherein the magnetic flux generator is an electromagnet and further comprising the step of controlling the electromagnet to vary at least one of the strength and direction of the magnetic flux in the magnetization space as the tissue-penetrating medical tool is passed through the magnetization space.
  • 29. The method according to claim 24, comprising using a device for magnetizing a tissue-penetrating medical tool comprising: a tool-receiving space for receiving at least part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool; a magnetic flux generator generating a magnetic field, the magnetic field having a magnetization region for magnetically-saturating the part of the tissue-penetrating medical tool which is in said tool-receiving space, the magnetic flux in the magnetization region being oriented in a direction substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the tissue-penetrating medical tool.
US Referenced Citations (227)
Number Name Date Kind
4317078 Weed Feb 1982 A
4508119 Tukamoto Apr 1985 A
5042486 Pfeiler Aug 1991 A
5055813 Johnson Oct 1991 A
5425382 Golden Jun 1995 A
5622169 Golden Apr 1997 A
5744953 Hansen Apr 1998 A
5767669 Hansen Jun 1998 A
5831260 Hansen Nov 1998 A
5833608 Acker Nov 1998 A
5879297 Haynor Mar 1999 A
5902238 Golden May 1999 A
5941889 Cermak Aug 1999 A
5944023 Johnson Aug 1999 A
5953683 Hansen Sep 1999 A
6073043 Schneider Jun 2000 A
6172499 Ashe Jan 2001 B1
6216028 Haynor Apr 2001 B1
6233476 Strommer May 2001 B1
6246231 Ashe Jun 2001 B1
6246898 Vesely Jun 2001 B1
6248074 Ohno Jun 2001 B1
6263230 Haynor et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266551 Osadchy Jul 2001 B1
6310532 Santa Cruz et al. Oct 2001 B1
6361499 Bates Mar 2002 B1
6368280 Cermak Apr 2002 B1
6379307 Filly Apr 2002 B1
6427079 Schneider Jul 2002 B1
6438401 Cheng Aug 2002 B1
6528991 Ashe Mar 2003 B2
6542766 Hall Apr 2003 B2
6546279 Bova Apr 2003 B1
6587709 Solf Jul 2003 B2
6626832 Paltieli Sep 2003 B1
6669635 Kessman Dec 2003 B2
6678552 Pearlman Jan 2004 B2
6690159 Burreson et al. Feb 2004 B2
6690963 Ben-Haim Feb 2004 B2
6716166 Govari Apr 2004 B2
6733458 Steins et al. May 2004 B1
6754596 Ashe Jun 2004 B2
6774624 Anderson Aug 2004 B2
6784660 Ashe Aug 2004 B2
6785571 Glossop Aug 2004 B2
6788967 Ben-Haim Sep 2004 B2
6813512 Aldefeld Nov 2004 B2
6834201 Gillies Dec 2004 B2
6856823 Ashe Feb 2005 B2
6895267 Panescu May 2005 B2
6954128 Humphries et al. Oct 2005 B2
6980921 Anderson Dec 2005 B2
7020512 Ritter Mar 2006 B2
7048745 Tierney May 2006 B2
7090639 Govari Aug 2006 B2
7197354 Sobe Mar 2007 B2
7215990 Feussner May 2007 B2
7274325 Fattah Sep 2007 B2
7275008 Plyvänäinen Sep 2007 B2
7324915 Altmann Jan 2008 B2
7351205 Szczech Apr 2008 B2
7373271 Schneider May 2008 B1
7386339 Strommer Jun 2008 B2
7471202 Anderson Dec 2008 B2
7505810 Harlev Mar 2009 B2
7517318 Altmann Apr 2009 B2
7524320 Tierney Apr 2009 B2
7551953 Lardo Jun 2009 B2
7555330 Gilboa Jun 2009 B2
7558616 Govari Jul 2009 B2
7561051 Kynor Jul 2009 B1
7573258 Anderson Aug 2009 B2
7588541 Floyd Sep 2009 B2
7603155 Jensen Oct 2009 B2
7603160 Suzuki Oct 2009 B2
7610078 Willis Oct 2009 B2
7618374 Barnes Nov 2009 B2
7636595 Marquart Dec 2009 B2
7652259 Kimchy Jan 2010 B2
7657298 Moctezuma de la Barrera Feb 2010 B2
7660623 Hunter Feb 2010 B2
7668583 Fegert Feb 2010 B2
7671887 Pescatore Mar 2010 B2
7697973 Strommer Apr 2010 B2
7706860 McGee Apr 2010 B2
7722565 Wood May 2010 B2
7749168 Maschke Jul 2010 B2
7769427 Shachar Aug 2010 B2
7797032 Martinelli Sep 2010 B2
7809421 Govari Oct 2010 B1
7819810 Stringer Oct 2010 B2
7822464 Maschke Oct 2010 B2
7831096 Williamson, Jr. Nov 2010 B2
7835785 Scully Nov 2010 B2
7840251 Glossop Nov 2010 B2
7840253 Tremblay Nov 2010 B2
7840256 Lakin Nov 2010 B2
7873401 Shachar Jan 2011 B2
7881769 Sobe Feb 2011 B2
7907989 Borgert Mar 2011 B2
7909815 Whitmore, III Mar 2011 B2
7926776 Cermak Apr 2011 B2
7945309 Govari May 2011 B2
7962196 Tuma Jun 2011 B2
7966057 Macaulay Jun 2011 B2
7971341 Dukesherer Jul 2011 B2
7974680 Govari Jul 2011 B2
7996059 Porath Aug 2011 B2
8023712 Ikuma Sep 2011 B2
8027714 Shachar Sep 2011 B2
8041411 Camus Oct 2011 B2
8041412 Glossop Oct 2011 B2
8041413 Barbagli Oct 2011 B2
8049503 Kimura Nov 2011 B2
8060184 Hastings Nov 2011 B2
8064985 Peterson Nov 2011 B2
8068897 Gazdzinski Nov 2011 B1
8073529 Cermak Dec 2011 B2
8082022 Moctezuma de la Barrera Dec 2011 B2
8086298 Whitmore, III Dec 2011 B2
8088070 Pelissier Jan 2012 B2
8090168 Washburn Jan 2012 B2
8106905 Markowitz Jan 2012 B2
8147408 Bunce Apr 2012 B2
8162821 Kawano Apr 2012 B2
8175680 Panescu May 2012 B2
8216149 Oonuki et al. Jul 2012 B2
8226562 Pelissier Jul 2012 B2
8228028 Schneider Jul 2012 B2
8506493 Ostrovsky Aug 2013 B2
20030036695 Govari Feb 2003 A1
20040047044 Dalton Mar 2004 A1
20040051610 Sajan Mar 2004 A1
20040106869 Tepper Jun 2004 A1
20040147920 Keidar Jul 2004 A1
20040171934 Khan Sep 2004 A1
20050020919 Stringer Jan 2005 A1
20050033315 Hankins Feb 2005 A1
20050101876 Pearlman May 2005 A1
20050107870 Wang May 2005 A1
20050143648 Minai Jun 2005 A1
20050197569 McCombs Sep 2005 A1
20060061354 Wallance Mar 2006 A1
20060072843 Johnston Apr 2006 A1
20060241397 Govari Oct 2006 A1
20060253107 Hashimshony Nov 2006 A1
20070016013 Camus Jan 2007 A1
20070027390 Maschke et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055468 Pylvänäinen Mar 2007 A1
20070163367 Sherman Jul 2007 A1
20070167801 Webler Jul 2007 A1
20070185398 Kimura Aug 2007 A1
20070276240 Rosner Nov 2007 A1
20080033286 Whitmore Feb 2008 A1
20080071172 Bruck Mar 2008 A1
20080094057 Ashe Apr 2008 A1
20080134727 May Jun 2008 A1
20080146939 McMorrow Jun 2008 A1
20080183071 Strommer Jul 2008 A1
20080249395 Shachar Oct 2008 A1
20080262338 Paitel Oct 2008 A1
20090105581 Widenhorn Apr 2009 A1
20090105584 Jones Apr 2009 A1
20090105779 Moore Apr 2009 A1
20090156926 Messerly et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090228019 Gross Sep 2009 A1
20090275833 Ikeda Nov 2009 A1
20090287443 Jascob Nov 2009 A1
20090299142 Uchiyama Dec 2009 A1
20090299176 Gleich Dec 2009 A1
20090312629 Razzaque Dec 2009 A1
20090322323 Brazdeikis Dec 2009 A1
20090326323 Uchiyama Dec 2009 A1
20100049033 Kawano Feb 2010 A1
20100049050 Pelissier Feb 2010 A1
20100079158 Bar-Tal Apr 2010 A1
20100121189 Ma May 2010 A1
20100121190 Pagoulatos May 2010 A1
20100137705 Jensen Jun 2010 A1
20100156399 Chiba Jun 2010 A1
20100174176 Nagel Jul 2010 A1
20100191101 Lichtenstein Jul 2010 A1
20100249576 Askarinya et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100268072 Hall Oct 2010 A1
20100312113 Ogasawara Dec 2010 A1
20110021903 Strommer Jan 2011 A1
20110028848 Shaquer Feb 2011 A1
20110034806 Hartov Feb 2011 A1
20110054293 Markowitz Mar 2011 A1
20110060185 Ikuma Mar 2011 A1
20110081063 Leroy Apr 2011 A1
20110082366 Scully Apr 2011 A1
20110118590 Zhang May 2011 A1
20110137152 Li Jun 2011 A1
20110137156 Razzaque Jun 2011 A1
20110144476 Jolesz Jun 2011 A1
20110144524 Fish Jun 2011 A1
20110184690 Iida Jul 2011 A1
20110224537 Brunner Sep 2011 A1
20110230757 Elgort Sep 2011 A1
20110237945 Foroughi Sep 2011 A1
20110251607 Kruecker Oct 2011 A1
20110282188 Burnside Nov 2011 A1
20110295108 Cox Dec 2011 A1
20110295110 Manzke Dec 2011 A1
20120016316 Zhuang Jan 2012 A1
20120071752 Sewell Mar 2012 A1
20120108950 He May 2012 A1
20120123243 Hastings May 2012 A1
20120130229 Zellers May 2012 A1
20120130230 Eichler May 2012 A1
20120136251 Kim May 2012 A1
20120143055 Ng Jun 2012 A1
20120150022 Bar-Tal Jun 2012 A1
20120197108 Hartmann Aug 2012 A1
20120232380 Pelissier Sep 2012 A1
20120259209 Harhen Oct 2012 A1
20130225986 Eggers Aug 2013 A1
20130296691 Ashe Nov 2013 A1
20140002063 Ashe Jan 2014 A1
20140046261 Newman Feb 2014 A1
20140058221 Old Feb 2014 A1
20140107475 Cox Apr 2014 A1
20140228670 Justis Aug 2014 A1
20140257080 Dunbar Sep 2014 A1
20140257104 Dunbar Sep 2014 A1
20140257746 Dunbar Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (48)
Number Date Country
455499 Feb 2010 AT
492214 Jan 2011 AT
2 647 432 Oct 2007 CA
2 659 586 Dec 2007 CA
10 2008 013 611 Sep 2009 DE
10 2010 046 948 Dec 2011 DE
0 488 987 Jun 1992 EP
0 747 016 Dec 1996 EP
0 928 976 Jul 1999 EP
1 212 001 Jun 2002 EP
1 377 335 Jan 2004 EP
1 504 713 Feb 2005 EP
1 715 788 Nov 2006 EP
1 727 478 Dec 2006 EP
1 804 079 Jul 2007 EP
1 898 775 Mar 2008 EP
1 913 875 Apr 2008 EP
2 445 669 Jul 2008 GB
2005-312577 Nov 2005 JP
9605768 Feb 1996 WO
0063658 Oct 2000 WO
0200093 Jan 2002 WO
2006078677 Jul 2006 WO
2006078678 Jul 2006 WO
2006124192 Nov 2006 WO
2007025081 Mar 2007 WO
2008035271 Mar 2008 WO
2008086832 Jul 2008 WO
2009070616 Jun 2009 WO
2009089280 Jul 2009 WO
2010111435 Sep 2010 WO
2010132985 Nov 2010 WO
2011043874 Apr 2011 WO
2011043875 Apr 2011 WO
2011044273 Apr 2011 WO
2011085034 Jul 2011 WO
2011095924 Aug 2011 WO
2011098926 Aug 2011 WO
2011109249 Sep 2011 WO
2011114259 Sep 2011 WO
2011123661 Oct 2011 WO
2011127191 Oct 2011 WO
2011150376 Dec 2011 WO
2012025854 Mar 2012 WO
2012040077 Mar 2012 WO
2012098483 Jul 2012 WO
2013034175 Mar 2013 WO
2014135592 Sep 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Stolowitz Ford Cowger LLP, Listing of Related Cases (Updated); Portland, OR; Sep. 17, 2014; 1 pages.
Placidi, Giuseppe, et al.; “Review on Patents about Magnetic Localisation Systems for in vito Catheterizations”; INFM c/o Department of Health Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio Coppito 2, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy; Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering 2009, 2, 58-64; Received: Dec. 24, 2008; Accepted: Jan. 9, 2009; Revised: Jan. 12, 2009; 8 pages.
Stolowitz Ford Cowger LLP, Listing of Related Cases; Portland, OR; Aug. 19, 2015; 1 page.
Dorveaux et al., “On-the-field Calibration of an Array of Sensors”, 2010 American Control Conference, Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 2010, Baltimore, MD, USA, 8 pages.
European Patent Office, “Internaional Search Report” for PCT/EP2011/065420, mailed Aug. 20, 2012, 5 pages.
Stolowitz Ford Cowger LLP, “Listing of Related Cases”, Feb. 5, 2014, 2 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140253270 A1 Sep 2014 US