The present invention relates to magnetooptic readers.
Magnetooptic readers make use of the Kerr effect or the Faraday effect. In the first case, to which the present invention relates, the induced polarization variations are measured on polarized light after reflection off a medium whose magnetization variations represent prerecorded information.
The choice of the nature and of the geometry of the various layers of the read transducer makes it possible to maximize the amplitude of the magnetooptic component to be read. However, it is observed that, when this optimum is reached, the phase shift between the read signal and the signal to be read is equal to π/2. The polarization of the signal is said to be elliptical. In total, the magnetooptic signal cannot be read under these conditions. For this type of device, the common practice is to estimate the signal-to-Schottky noise ratio by a quantity which represents it, called the figure of merit (or FM). The figure of merit depends, under conditions explained in the detailed description, on various quantities which are not simultaneously optimal for a given polarization of the incident beam. In structures optimized for the amplitude of the magnetooptic component, the figure of merit will be zero if no modification is made to the device.
The prior art, the limitations of which it is the object of the present invention to overcome, is represented especially by French patents No. 2 569 072, 2 656 723, 2 657 190, 2 680 268, 2 696 037 and 2 701 332.
In these devices of the prior art, two solutions are envisioned for maximizing the figure of merit. The first solution consists in placing a λ/2 plate in the path of the incident beam so as to convert the polarization of the incident beam while maintaining the orientation of the image of the light source focussed onto the read pole. The second solution consists in placing a birefringent plate in the path of the reflected beam so as to linearize the polarization of the reflected beam. Both these solutions are expensive in terms of components, adjustments and size, and thereby counter to the desired objectives of reducing cost and size in information storage systems.
The present invention makes it possible to achieve the desired optimizations without an additional component, or even with fewer components than the prior art.
For these purposes, the invention provides a magnetooptic read device of the type comprising a magnetooptic transducer designed to cooperate with a magnetized medium to be read, a light source for applying, through an upstream polarizer, an excitation beam to the magnetooptic transducer, and a photodetection unit lying on the optical path of the reflected beam coming from the magnetooptic transducer in order to deliver an electrical read signal, in which the magnetooptic transducer produces, in response to the excitation beam, a reflected beam which comprises, on the one hand, a reflected part of the excitation beam and, on the other hand, owing to the effect of a principal component (S) of the electric field of the incident wave, a magnetooptic component containing the read information, characterized in that the upstream polarizer is set so as to let through both the principal component (S) and its orthogonal component (P) with a lower amplitude, the latter interacting with the magnetooptic transducer in order to improve the amplitude/phase state of the magnetooptic component of the beam applied to the photodetection unit.
In a variant of the invention, the device furthermore includes a second polarizer placed in the path of the reflected beam, the two polarizers being set jointly to improve the amplitude/phase state of the magnetooptic component of the beam applied to the photodetector.
In another variant of the invention, the device furthermore includes a second polarizer in the path of the reflected beam, this second polarizer being set to adjust the amplitude of the beam applied to the photodetector below the saturation threshold of the latter.
The invention will be more clearly understood and its various features and advantages will become apparent from the description which follows of an illustrative example and from its appended figures in which:
A simplified basic diagram of the devices of the prior art is given in
The figure of merit depends especially on a quantity Tr, the value of which depends on the dimensions of the laser beam at the focal point and on the extent of that region of the read pole of the magnetooptic transducer which is excited by the magnetic bits written on the tape. Tr is a maximum when the largest dimension of the incident light beam is parallel to the read edge, (i.e.: the line of contact between the magnetooptic transducer and the magnetic medium), this being obtained for S-polarized light, the largest dimension of the light beam being collinear with the electric field.
However, the figure of merit also depends on an amplification coefficient Tc of the magnetooptic signal, the value of which depends on the amount of light absorbed by the magnetooptic medium constituting the read pole. However, optimization of the coupling between the incident beam and the read pole is accompanied by a change in the state of polarization of the reflected beam. Thus, for optimum coupling, the incident light of polarization S is reflected in a completely elliptical polarization state, that is to say the principal component S and the magnetooptic component oscillate in phase opposition; there therefore cannot be any pumping of the magnetooptic component by the S component of the reflected field since, when the electric field in the S state is a maximum, the electric field of the magnetooptic component is zero and vice versa. The figure of merit is then zero. This change in the state of polarization of the reflected beam does not take place for an incident polarization P. The principal component P and the magnetooptic component oscillate in phase.
In the prior art, Tr and Tc are therefore optimized for opposed values of the polarization of the principal component. The invention consists in using the advantages of the two polarizations.
The interactions between the incident wave, polarized in the manner that has just been described, and the magnetooptic transducer (TMO) will then be the following:
Furthermore, the reflection coefficient of the magnetooptic transducer (TMO) is chosen so that the intensity of the reflected wave is less than the saturation threshold of the photodetector (PHO), thereby making it possible to eliminate the second polarizer (POL-2) of the prior art, the function of which was especially to keep the intensity of the signal transmitted to the photodetector at a level below the saturation threshold of the latter.
However, cases may exist in which:
In both these cases, the device according to the invention will include, as shown in
In the configuration of the prior art as shown by
FM≈TrTcrsCTos(εs)cos(α2)
where Tr and Tc have the meanings indicated above, α2 is the setting angle of the polarizer POL-2, εs is the ellipticity of the reflected beam, that is to say the phase shift between the principal component (in this case S) and the magnetooptic component induced by the reflection and the interactions in the transducer, and rsp is the amplitude magnetooptic reflection coefficient generated during interaction of the incident beam with the magnetooptic medium. This coefficient is that of a layer placed in air and with a thickness very much greater than the skin depth. It is proportional to the amount of light absorbed by the medium.
It will be noted that the optimization of Tc by a judicious choice of the layers of the transducer results in a value of εs close to π/2, i.e. a value of the figure of merit close to zero.
In the configuration according to the invention, as shown by
FM≈TrTcrsCTos(εp)cos2(α)
where εp is the ellipticity of the reflected beam received by the photodetector when the incident beam has a small polarization P. α is the polarization angle set on the polarizer POL-A.
The quadratic dependence on the polarization angle is introduced by the fact that the projection base itself effects a rotation through the angle of polarization. εp is close to zero.
The dependence of the figure of merit on εp, and not on εs, ensures that the ellipticity is eliminated and therefore that the figure of merit is improved, all other things being equal.
This embodiment makes it possible both to ensure that the incident beam is focussed onto the magnetooptic transducer and to maintain the position of the reflected beam with respect to the photodetector despite the positional variations of the magnetic medium with respect to the transducer, said variations being compensated for by the control signal output by the processing circuit (CT).
Unlike the prior art, the device according to the invention does not include in its preferred embodiment a second polarizer in the path of the reflected beam, without this modifying the operation of the various abovementioned optical elements.
A high-frequency magnetic field inductor (MI) will advantageously be placed near the read region so as to create a field parallel to the magnetized medium (MM) which will stabilize the magnetic domains of the magnetic medium and of the magnetooptic transducer (TMO), thus appreciably improving the signal-to-noise ratio and the figure of merit.
The light source may be replaced with a number of sources organized in a linear array perpendicular to the plane of
The photodetector may be a CCD (Charge Coupled Device) sensor or, preferably, a CMOS sensor whose saturation threshold is higher.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
99 15987 | Dec 1999 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR00/03485 | 12/12/2000 | WO | 00 | 10/8/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/45099 | 6/21/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3636535 | Cushner et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
4228473 | Himuro et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4586092 | Martens et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4654837 | Browder | Mar 1987 | A |
4918675 | Lee | Apr 1990 | A |
5007021 | Hattori | Apr 1991 | A |
5099470 | Matsubayashi | Mar 1992 | A |
5124868 | Matsubayashi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5528576 | Nishikawa | Jun 1996 | A |
5568336 | Jolivet | Oct 1996 | A |
5586101 | Gage et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5790501 | Nishikawa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5961848 | Jacquet et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6538968 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 372 881 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 380 329 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 439 383 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0 468 800 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 557 212 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 611 202 | Aug 1994 | EP |
2 696 037 | Mar 1994 | FR |
2 699 724 | Jun 1994 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040042700 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |