Magnetorheological fluid device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6823895
  • Patent Number
    6,823,895
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 30, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 30, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
The disclosure describes a magnetorheological fluid control valve. The magnetorheological fluid control valve comprises an electromagnetic coil having a first end and a second end. A first arm is magnetically coupled to the first end of the electromagnetic coil. A second arm is magnetically coupled to the second end of the electromagnetic coil. The second arm has a passage. A ferromagnetic rod having a diameter less than that of the passage is disposed in the passage and magnetically coupled to the first and second arms. A first manifold is coupled to the second arm at one end of the passage. A second manifold is coupled between the second arm and the first arm at an end of the passage opposite the first manifold. A magnetorheological fluid is disposed in the passage.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present disclosure relates to the fields of vibration control and energy dissipation through a field-controllable fluid device. Particularly the present disclosure relates to a magnetorheological fluid control valve.




BACKGROUND




Magnetorheological fluid-based control valves provide flow control by varying electrical current to an electromagnet that affects the apparent viscosity of the magnetorheological fluid (MRF). Increased electric current provides an increased magnetic field, which in turn, increases the apparent viscosity of the fluid. Therefore, the flow rate through the valve can be controlled.




A MRF consists of ferrous particles suspended in a carrier fluid. The rheological behavior of the fluid occurs under presence of a magnetic field where the ferrous particles polarize to a chain-like formation. The iron particles chain up through attraction in the direction of the magnetic flux and the strength of their attraction is directly related to the strength of the magnetic field. The rheology of MRF is capable of changing within milliseconds under a magnetic field. MRF based valves are ideal for semi-active control applications.




MRF valves can be used in variety of mechanical systems such as automotive, bicycle, and motorcycle shock absorber applications, where damping forces are controlled. An emerging application for MRF valved dampers, as protective devices, is in the area of energy mitigation for large structures, such as buildings and bridges under earthquake and/or severe storms. These damper applications along with basic flow control in any hydraulic system comprise the primary fields of use for the invention.




State-of-the-art in MRF valve technology relies on strict manufacturing tolerances and additional mechanical assembly features that limit the practical application for a broad use in hydraulic systems. Designs that require electromagnetic solenoid locations close to the MRF valve region can make manufacturing and assembly cost prohibitive and prone to maintenance complications. MRF valves that require additional springs, pistons, and seals present additional potential valve wear induced failures. The magnetic field conduction path should be designed to prevent the least leakage of magnetic field to valve components that are not directly related to the MRF valving location.




SUMMARY




The disclosure describes a magnetorheological fluid control valve. The magnetorheological fluid control valve comprises an electromagnetic coil having a first end and a second end. A first arm is magnetically coupled to the first end of the electromagnetic coil. A second arm is magnetically coupled to the second end of the electromagnetic coil. The second arm has a passage. A ferromagnetic rod having a diameter less than that of the passage is disposed in the passage and magnetically coupled to the first and second arms. A first manifold is coupled to the second arm at one end of the passage. A second manifold is coupled between the second arm and the first arm at an end of the passage opposite the first manifold. A magnetorheological fluid is disposed in the passage.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES





FIG. 1

is an isometric view of an exemplary embodiment of an MRF control valve;





FIG. 2

is a partial section of an annular flow region in an isometric view;





FIG. 3

is a cross section through mid-plane A of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is a diagram of a magnetic flux path through an exemplary embodiment of an MRF control valve;





FIG. 5

is a cross section of the annular flow region along the long axis of the annular flow region;





FIG. 6

is a diagram of an exemplary system employing the MRF control valve;





FIG. 7

is a graphical representation of experimental pressure drop versus position results for tests of an exemplary embodiment at different input currents; and





FIG. 8

is a graphical representation of experimental pressure drop versus velocity results for tests of an exemplary embodiment at different input currents.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Persons of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the present invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, an isometric view illustrates an exemplary MRF control valve


10


. The MRF control valve


10


includes an electromagnetic coil


12


that comprises an electrically energized coil of insulated wire that produces a magnetic field within the coil (see FIG.


3


). The electromagnetic coil


12


is fastened between a first arm (magnet-support member)


14


and a second arm (magnet-support member)


16


by fasteners


18


. The first arm


14


and second arm


16


, are preferably formed from a ferrous material (ferromagnetic). In a preferred embodiment, the second arm


16


can be L-shaped including a first branch


15


and a second branch


17


perpendicular thereto. Also included are a first manifold


20


and a second manifold


22


. The first manifold


20


and the second manifold


22


are preferably formed from a non-ferrous material. The first manifold


20


is coupled to second arm


16


at an elbow


24


of the second arm


16


. The second manifold


22


is coupled between the first arm


14


and the second arm


16


at an end of the second arm distal from the elbow


24


. A first aperture


26


is located in the first manifold


20


and a second aperture


28


is located in the second manifold


22


. The first aperture


26


and the second aperture


28


can be threaded in preferred embodiments to receive fluid couplings (not shown).




Referring to

FIG. 2

the control valve


10


is illustrated in a partial section. The partial section illustrates additional components of the control valve


10


. The control valve


10


includes a flow region


30


. The flow region


30


is defined beginning with the first aperture


26


into a first bore


32


formed in the first manifold


20


. The flow region


30


extends from the first bore


32


through a first bushing


34


into an annular region


36


. The first bushing


34


is fitted sealable between the first manifold


20


and the second arm


16


to fluidly seal the assembly. The annular region


36


is defined by a passage (duct)


38


formed through the second arm


16


and by an inner rod


40


disposed in the passage


38


. The inner rod


40


extends into the first manifold


20


and opposite thereof into the first arm


14


. Inner rod


40


is preferably formed from a ferrous material. The flow region


30


is further defined from the annular region


36


into a second bushing


42


into a second bore


44


formed in the second manifold


22


. The second bushing


42


is sealably fitted between the second arm


16


and the second manifold


22


to fluidly seal the assembly. The flow region


30


facilitates MRF flow through the control valve


10


into and out of first aperture


26


and second aperture


28


. MRF can also flow from the second aperture


28


to the first aperture


26


.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, the control valve


10


is illustrated in a cross section through a mid-plane “A” shown in FIG.


2


. The electromagnetic coil


12


includes a coil of wire


46


encircled about a core


48


. The core (or magnetic core)


48


is a material that can be magnetized, and is preferably formed from a ferrous material. The coil of wire


46


is electrically coupled to an electrical source (not shown) that provides electrical current through the coil of wire


46


. Driving a current through the coil of wire


46


will magnetize the core


48


, thus, creating a magnetic field. The magnetic field aligns the minute magnetic domains that are inherent in the ferromagnetic material of the core


48


, and thus, magnetizes the core


48


. The core


48


is magnetically coupled to the first arm


14


and the second arm


16


. The inner rod


40


is magnetically coupled to the first arm


14


. The inner rod


40


is magnetically isolated from the first manifold


20


. The annular region


36


formed by the passage


38


and inner rod


40


defines a gap that magnetically isolates the inner rod


40


from the passage


38


of the second arm


16


when there is no MRF filling the annular region


36


. When MRF fills the annular region


36


, second arm


16


is magnetically coupled to the inner rod


40


.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, a cross section of control valve


10


is shown to illustrate the magnetic path formed by the control valve


10


. As discussed above with reference to

FIG. 3

, the core


48


, first arm


14


and second arm


16


are magnetically coupled. A magnetic circuit


50


is formed in the control valve


10


. The magnetic circuit


50


includes the first arm


14


coupled to the core


48


coupled to the second arm


16


and then coupled to the MRF


52


coupled to the inner rod


40


and to the first arm


14


.

FIG. 4

illustrates the lines of magnetic flux


54


in the magnetic circuit


50


. The magnetic flux


54


flows through the magnetic circuit


50


along the path of the components. The magnetic flux


50


flows from the second arm


16


through the MRF


52


in the annular region


36


to the inner rod


40


. The magnetic flux


54


is perpendicular to the annular region


36


as well as continuous along the entire length. Therefore, the magnetic flux


54


is perpendicular to the fluid flow of the MRF


52


as it passes through the annular region


36


. Because the magnetic flux


54


is perpendicular in the annular region


36


, the magnetic field at that region is strongest, thus the effect on the MRF


52


is most effective along the entire annular region


36


. The magnetic forces that can be applied to the MRF


52


to vary the flow characteristics (such as apparent viscosity) are dependent on the geometry of the annular region


36


and the effective strength and size of the magnetic field applied to the MRF


52


. The distance illustrated by numeral


56


can be varied in order to alter the performance characteristics of the control valve


10


. As the distance


56


changes, the annular region


36


changes and the resultant magnetic field at the annular region


36


is altered. Changes in the materials within the magnetic circuit


50


as well as the current applied to the electromagnetic coil


12


can influence the MRF


52


. With reference to

FIG. 5

, variation of the diameters of the passage


38


and inner rod


40


can also influence the flow of MRF


52


in the annular region


36


.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, a system diagram is illustrated with a damping system


100


including an MRF control valve


110


. The damping system


100


includes a hydraulic damper


112


coupled to the MRF control valve


110


through a first hose


114


and a second hose


116


. MRF


118


is contained in and fluidly couples the hydraulic damper


112


to the MRF control valve


110


through the first and second hoses


114


,


116


. The damping system


100


also includes a sensor


120


in operative communication with a control unit


122


. The sensor


120


senses vibration and/or relative motion within the hydraulic damper


112


. The vibration and/or motion can be related to linear displacement due to earthquakes, mechanical reaction forces from vehicle suspension systems, landing gear, and the like. The control unit


122


is operatively coupled to the MFR control valve


110


externally of the MRF


118


to provide control inputs for actuation of the MRF control valve


110


. There are no electrical penetrations through the working fluid boundary. A power source


124


is operatively coupled to the control unit


122


to provide electrical current to the MRF control valve


110


.




The demonstrative hydraulic damper


112


includes a housing


126


containing the MRF


118


and an accumulator (not shown) to accommodate volumetric changes due to piston displacement and thermal expansion. The interior of the housing


126


defines a cylinder


128


that receives a piston


130


coupled to a rod


132


having a mating bracket


134


on an end opposite of the piston


130


. The mating bracket


134


receivably couples to a structure that is to be dampened (not shown) such as a beam of a building, a chassis for a vehicle, landing gear linkages and the like. MRF


118


fluidly communicates through the first and second hoses


114


,


116


into the MRF control valve


110


via the first aperture


136


and second aperture


138


.




In one embodiment, MRF


118


fluidly communicates from the first hose


114


into the first bore


140


through the first aperture


136


and past the first bushing


142


. The MRF


118


fluidly communicates with the annular region


144


through the second bushing


146


and into the second bore


148


and to the second aperture


138


to the second hose


116


. The MRF


118


can flow in a direction from the first hose


114


through the MRF control valve


110


to the second hose


116


as well in the opposite direction.




In an exemplary embodiment, the damping system


100


operates to dampen mechanical translation generated by external vibration and/or translation of components coupled to the mating bracket


134


. As the external motion is received by the mating bracket


134


, the motion is translated to the rod


132


and piston


130


assembly. The piston


130


translates within the cylinder


128


and displaces MRF


118


. If, for example, the piston


130


translates such that the MRF


118


is displaced within the cylinder


128


toward the first hose


114


and away from the second hose


116


, the MRF


118


flows through the first hose


114


into the first aperture


136


. The MRF


118


flows through the first bore


140


and past the first bushing


142


and through the annular region


144


. The MRF


118


flows past the second bushing


146


, second bore


148


and through the second hose


116


into the cylinder


128


.




As the MRF


118


flows within the damping system


100


past the system components, fluid flow resistance (due to fluid friction forces) acts on the MRF


118


. The fluid flow resistance can be characterized as passive resistance within the system


100


. The passive resistance acts to dampen the translation of the rod


132


and piston


130


within the cylinder


128


. As the piston


130


is translated through the MRF


118


, the MRF


118


resists the translation of the piston


130


due to fluid friction within the damping system


100


. The passive resistance does not rely on any active change in the MRF


118


. Therefore, the MRF control valve


110


has inherent passive damping properties.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, the operation of the damping system


100


is further described. The MRF control valve


110


also has controllable damping properties. Due to the inherent properties of the MRF


118


, exposure to magnetic fields alters the apparent viscosity of the MRF


118


. When the electromagnetic coil


150


of the MRF control valve is energized with an electric current through the coil of wire


152


around the magnetic core


154


a magnetic flux (see

FIG. 4

) is generated within the MRF control valve


110


. The magnetic flux acts on the MRF


118


and alters the apparent viscosity of the MRF


118


. The apparent viscosity of the MRF


118


can be varied depending on the magnitude of the magnetic flux that passes through the MRF


118


in the MRF control valve


110


. The magnetic flux is dependent upon the amount of electrical current that passes through the coil of wire


152


.




Due to the arrangement of the MRF control valve


110


, specifically the annular region


144


, the magnetic flux can act on the MRF


118


within the annular region


144


along the entire length of the annular region


144


in a continuous manner. There are no discrete sections of magnetic flux across the MRF


118


within the MRF control valve


110


. The magnetic flux can flow through the MRF control valve


110


from the magnetic core


154


to the second arm


158


through the MRF


118


and to the inner rod


160


to the first arm


162


back to the magnetic core


154


. The polarity of the electric current flowing through the coil of wire


152


can be reversed such that the magnetic flux flows in a direction from the magnetic core


154


to the first arm


162


to the inner rod


160


through the MRF


118


and into the second arm


158


and back to the magnetic core


154


. The magnetic flux will flow perpendicular to the long axis of the inner rod


160


and annular region


144


.




The MRF control valve


110


is capable of providing both passive damping as well as controllable damping within the damping system


100


. The ratio of passive damping to controllable damping can be varied depending on the requirements of the damping system


100


. The MRF control valve


110


can be geometrically varied to provide greater and lesser passive as well as controllable damping. For example, the annular region


144


can be lengthened thereby increasing the magnetic flux across the MRF


118


, thus, increasing the potential for controllable damping. The increase in length also increases the flow resistance within the annular region


144


, thus increasing the passive damping. The diameter of the annular region


144


can be increased to allow for larger mass flow rates through the MRF control valve


110


, thus larger hydraulic dampers


112


can be accommodated. Since the controllable damping is directly related to the amount of current flowing through the electromagnetic coil


150


. By varying the current through the electromagnetic coil


150


, the active damping can be varied. By altering the current through the electromagnetic coil


150


, the MRF control valve can be fitted to a wide range of damping systems


100


and provide active and passive damping without the need to alter the geometry of the MRF control valve. The MRF control valve


110


is versatile.




Referring to

FIG. 7

, a graphical representation of experimental pressure drop versus position is illustrated. The

FIG. 7

presents typical input electromagnetic coil current comparative experimental results for pressure drop across the MRF valve versus position of a piston-cylinder source, which provides the externally driven harmonic flow. Pressure drop is shown on the “Y” axis and the position of a piston-cylinder source is shown on the “X” axis at different input currents. Numeral


58


represents the input current at 0.00 Amp,


60


is 0.25 Amp,


62


is 0.50 Amp,


64


is 1.00 Amp and


66


represents an input current value of 2.00 Amps.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, a graphical representation of experimental results for pressure drop across the MRF valve versus velocity of the external hydraulic source provided by a reciprocating piston-cylinder is illustrated. Pressure drop in kilo Pascals (kPa) is shown on the “Y” axis and the velocity in centimeters per second (cm/s) of the piston-cylinder is shown on the “X” axis at different input currents. Numeral


58


represents the input current at 0.00 Amp,


60


is 0.25 Amp,


62


is 0.50 Amp,


64


is 1.00 Amp and


66


represents an input current value of 2.00 Amps.




The configuration of the MRF control valve promotes magnetic flux across the entire length of the annular region. The MRF control valve can have a very long annular flow region length. The longer the annular region of the MRF control valve, the greater the MRF dynamic force range. The MRF control valve does not rely on any mechanical moving parts and manufacturing tolerances. The length and diameter of the annular region within the valve, as well as the diameter of the valve's flow region and material properties of all the parts used in the proposed device can be varied to obtain the desired damping force. The annular region of embodiments of the MRF valve relies on the unique magnetic circuit embodied in the MRF control valve. The magnetic circuit is completed through the MRF fluid in the annular region. Results indicate that the configuration promotes an efficient magnetic circuit. The annular region can be designed so that a baseline viscous pressure drop is inherent in the valve region. When the MRF valve is used in a damper application, it will have a fail-safe characteristic. A fail-safe damper is defined as a damper, which retains a damping capacity despite power supply and/or controller failure. The viscous passive portion of the damping force can be minimized to a very small force (about zero), if needed for a specific damping system application. A fail-safe characteristic is important when electrical system failure will not result in damper failure. Without electrical input, the MRF valve will function as a passive damper.




The invention presented offers the following benefits that enhance the current state-of-the-art in the field of MRF valve technology including: an efficient magnetic circuit through the described annular region; that is perpendicular to the flow direction for the entire length of the valve; simple geometric configuration that does not rely on any moving part; and a fail-safe valve when used in a damper (or actuator) application where in the case of an electrical system failure the MRF damping system will still function at a certain passive state.




The MRF valve can be incorporated into hydraulic fluid applications via an external, or internal, flow control valve. The proposed MRF valve can be used in retrofit damper applications where a standard hydraulic piston cylinder can be converted into a damper by the simple external installation. The disclosed device can be built at any length and developed for applications in vehicle suspension, aerospace landing gear, and other damped hydraulic systems. The disclosed device can be implemented singularly or in a multiple configuration of valves in series or parallel to accommodate various flow rates. The simplicity of the MRF valve devices offer flow control without mechanically complex moving parts, which are vulnerable to possible wear induced failure and external mechanical system malfunction.




While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A magnetorheological fluid control valve comprising:an electromagnetic coil having a first end and a second end; a first arm magnetically coupled to the first end of said electromagnetic coil; a second arm magnetically coupled to the second end of said electromagnetic coil, said second arm having a passage; a ferromagnetic rod having a diameter less than that of said passage disposed in said passage and magnetically coupled to said first and second arms; a first manifold coupled to said second arm at one end of said passage; a second manifold coupled between said second arm and said first arm at an end of said passage opposite said first manifold; a magnetorheological fluid disposed in said passage.
  • 2. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 further comprising:an electromagnetic circuit, said electromagnetic circuit having no electrical penetrations through said magnetorheological fluid disposed in said passage.
  • 3. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic coil and said first arm are integral.
  • 4. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said first arm and said second arm are formed of a ferromagnetic material.
  • 5. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said first and second manifold are formed of a non-ferromagnetic material.
  • 6. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 further comprising:a first bushing coupled between said first manifold and said second arm; and a second bushing coupled between said second manifold and said second arm opposite said first bushing.
  • 7. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 6 wherein said first bushing fluidly seals between said first manifold and said passage and said second bushing fluidly seals between said second manifold and said passage.
  • 8. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said passage is configured such that said magnetorheological said disposed in said passage flows from said first manifold to said second manifold.
  • 9. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said passage is configured such that said magnetorheological fluid disposed in said passage flows from said second manifold to said first manifold.
  • 10. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said ferromagnetic rod and said passage are configured to form an annular region, said magnetorheological fluid being disposed in said annular region.
  • 11. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 10 wherein a magnetic flux flows continuously along said annular region and perpendicular to said annular region.
  • 12. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said ferromagnetic rod and said passage can be geometrically altered to vary flow characteristics.
  • 13. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein a magnetic field formed between said ferromagnetic rod and said passage can be altered to vary flow characteristics.
  • 14. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic coil includes a reversible polarity.
  • 15. The magnetorheological fluid control valve of claim 1 wherein said magnetorheological fluid disposed in said passage is both passively damped and controllably damped.
  • 16. A magnetorheological fluid control valve comprising:an electro-magnet wound on a ferromagnetic core; a first magnet-support member formed from a ferromagnetic material in contact with and fastened to a first end of said ferromagnetic core; a second magnet-support member formed from a ferromagnetic material in contact with and fastened to a second end of said ferromagnetic core, said second magnet-support member including a duct formed therethrough; a first manifold formed from a non-ferromagnetic material having a fluid coupling at a first end thereof, said first manifold having a second end communicating with a first end of said duct; a second manifold formed from a non-ferromagnetic material having a fluid coupling at a first end thereof, said second manifold having second end communicating with a second end of said duct; a rod formed from a ferromagnetic material and disposed within said duct, said rod supported at a first end by said first manifold, said rod extending through said second manifold and in contact with and supported at a second end by said first magnet-support member such that a magnetic gap is formed between said rod and an inner wall of said second magnet support member defining said duct; and said first manifold, said duct and said second manifold forming a fluid-tight passage for said magnetorheological fluid.
  • 17. The magnetorheological fluid control valve coupling of claim 16 wherein said second end of said first and second manifolds are coupled to said duct in said second magnet-support member through fluid tight bushings.
  • 18. The magnetorheological fluid control valve coupling claim 16 wherein said second magnet-support member is substantially L-shaped, and comprises a first branch in contact with and fastened to said second end of said ferromagnetic core, and a second branch in which said duct is longitudinally disposed.
CROSS-RELATED

This application is a utility application claiming priority to an earlier filed U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/295,312, filed May 31, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
2820471 Crowell Jul 1953 A
2667237 Rabinow Jan 1954 A
2670749 Germer Mar 1954 A
2692582 Curci et al. Oct 1954 A
2869818 Fleuret Jan 1959 A
3010471 Gross Nov 1961 A
3059915 Kemelhor Oct 1962 A
3448751 Rosaen Jun 1969 A
3485254 Ernst Dec 1969 A
3587613 Mark et al. Jun 1971 A
3672387 Harris et al. Jun 1972 A
3970112 Bernard Jul 1976 A
4840112 Bhadra et al. Jun 1989 A
5113890 Elizondo-Gonzalez et al. May 1992 A
5158109 Hare, Sr. Oct 1992 A
5161653 Hare, Sr. Nov 1992 A
5241991 Iorio et al. Sep 1993 A
5333646 Delot Aug 1994 A
5353839 Kordonsky et al. Oct 1994 A
5362027 Champaigne et al. Nov 1994 A
5377721 Kiyohiro et al. Jan 1995 A
5452745 Kordonsky et al. Sep 1995 A
6116144 Rosenfeldt et al. Sep 2000 A
6131709 Jolly et al. Oct 2000 A
6296088 Carlson Oct 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
G. Hitchcock et al., “A New By-Pass, Fail-Safe, Magneto-Rheological Fluid Damper”, SPIE's 9th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 17-21, 2002.
G. Hitchcock et al., “Study of a new By-Pass Magneto-Rheological Fluid Damper”, 3rd World Conference on Structural Control, Como, Italy, Apr. 7-12, 2002.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/295312 May 2001 US