1. Field of the Invention
In general, the present invention relates to projectile launchers that launch cylindrical projectiles having a long axis, wherein the direction of projectile travel is perpendicular to the long axis. More particularly, the present invention relates to projectiles that are helped in flight by the Magnus effect.
2. Prior Art Description
If an object in flight spins around an axis that is not aligned with its direction of travel, then that object is subject to the Magnus effect. As an object in motion spins, the part of the object that is spinning into the oncoming air creates a small area of high pressure. Conversely, the part of the object that is spinning away from the oncoming air creates an area of low pressure. The areas of low pressure and high pressure produce a vectored force that can cause an object in flight to alter its direction. This movement is also known as the Magnus effect in fluid dynamics. The Magnus effect is the reason spinning baseballs curve and poorly hit golf balls slice.
In the toy industry, the Magnus effect has been used to add complexity to the flight of projectiles. Examples of such prior art toys are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,167,992 to Olsen, U.S. Pat. No. 4,452,007 to Martin and U.S. Pat. No. 5,067,792 to McMahon. The problem with such prior art toys is that the rotation imparted on the projectile is created by an elastic cord or string that is wrapped under tension around the projectile. The cord is pulled as the projectile is launched. The release of tensile energy imparts a rapid rotation to the projectile, therein invoking the Magnus effect.
Wrapping the projectile of a toy in a cord or string, particularly an elastic cord or elastic string, is both time consuming and awkward. It is also beyond the hand/eye skills of many children and adults. The result is that the string or cord is often wrapped loosely, or in a pattern that is prone to tangling. The result is that the projectile becomes difficult to launch and does not fly well once it is launched. Accordingly, the toy loses much of its play value and thus, its popularity and ultimately its marketability.
A need therefore exists for a toy system that launches a projectile in a manner that is highly susceptible to the Magnus effect without requiring the projectile be wrapped or otherwise tethered. In this manner, the projectile can be launched into flight quickly, easily and in a manner that can be readily mastered by even a young child. This need is met by the present invention as described and claimed below.
The present invention is a toy projectile and launcher system. The projectile is cylindrical in shape and lightweight. The projectile has an exterior surface that is symmetrically disposed about an imaginary longitudinal axis.
The launcher has a holding trough that receives and holds the tubular projectile. Within the launcher is a spring loaded element. The spring loaded element selectively moves between a cocked position and a released position. The spring loaded element is biased into its released position by a spring. When manually moved to its cocked position, the spring stores energy.
The spring loaded element contacts the projectile in the holding trough as the spring loaded element moves from its cocked position to its released position. Contact with the spring loaded element causes the tubular projectile to launch into flight in a direction perpendicular to its longitudinal axis. Simultaneously, contact with the spring loaded element imparts a spinning rotation to the projectile, wherein the projectile spins about its longitudinal axis in flight. The spinning creates a Magnus effect on the projectile that helps keep it in flight and alters its flight path.
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following description of exemplary embodiments thereof, considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Although the present invention projectile and launcher can be embodied in many ways, only two embodiments of the invention are illustrated and described. These embodiments are selected in order to set forth some of the best modes contemplated for the invention. The illustrated embodiments, however, are merely exemplary and should not be considered limitations when interpreting the scope of the appended claims.
Referring to
In
Referring to
A spring loaded hammer 28 is provided. The hammer 28 has a head 30 that strikes the projectile 10 at a tangent. The head 30 of the hammer 28 is preferably covered in an elastomeric material that has a high degree of resiliency and a high coefficient of friction. The head 30 of the hammer 28 contacts the projectile 10 along a tangent while traveling at a high speed. This has two effects. First, it provides the projectile 10 with a large amount of rotational energy. This causes the projectile 10 to spin. Second the head 30 of the hammer 28 transfers kinetic energy to the projectile 10 and knocks the projectile 10 out of the holding trough 24 and into flight.
The hammer 28 contains one or two arms 32 that support the head 30. The arms 32 are pivotally connected to the base 22 at pivot connections 34. The arms 32 are biased into a released position that holds the head 30 immediately adjacent the holding trough 24. The spring bias is provided by one or two torsion springs 36 that connect to both the base 22 and the arms 32. The hammer 28 can be manually moved into a cocked position against the bias of the springs 36. To do this, the hammer 28 is rotated about the pivot connections 34 until the head 30 of the hammer 28 connects to a trigger catch 38. The trigger catch 38 is opened by the pulling of a trigger lever 40 under the base 22.
Once the hammer 28 is rotated to its cocked position, spring energy is stored in the springs 36. When the trigger lever 40 is pulled, the trigger catch 38 disengages the head 30. The stored spring energy then causes the hammer 28 to rotate in the manner of a mousetrap. The head 30 on the hammer 28 accelerates with the rotating hammer 28 until the head 30 strikes the side of the projectile 10.
The head 30 of the hammer 28 strikes the projectile 10 with a glancing blow that acts at a tangent to the curvature of the projectile 10. This transfers much of the energy from the hammer 28 to the projectile 10 in the form of spin. However, the contact with the hammer 28 also has the effect of displacing the projectile 10 from the holding trough 24 and launching the projectile 10 into flight. The projectile 10 rotates rapidly around its long axis 14 as it is launched into flight. The forward projection away from the holding trough 24 and the rapid rotation create a Magnus force that helps to keep the projectile 10 in flight. As previously mentioned, the projectile 10 tends to fly up and around in a looping flight path.
Referring to
The launcher 60 has a holding trough 62 for holding the projectile 50. A gear rack 64 is provided. The gear rack 64 is disposed in a track 66 that passes through the holding trough 62. The gear rack 64 is spring loaded with a spring 68. A pull tab 70 is present at one end of the gear rack 64. When the pull tab 70 is pulled, the gear rack 64 moves horizontally in the track 66 and the spring 68 compresses. Once the spring 68 is fully compressed, the gear rack 64 engages an internal trigger catch that holds the gear rack 64 and spring 68 in a cocked position.
The trigger catch 72 is operated by a trigger lever 74. When the trigger lever 74 is pulled, the gear rack 64 is released. The spring 68 releases its stored energy and the gear rack 64 is rapidly accelerated horizontally in the track 66 from a cocked position to a released position.
The projectile 50 is placed in the holding trough 62 so that the gear teeth impressions 52 on the projectile 50 intermesh with the gear rack 64. When the gear rack 64 is released from its cocked position, the gear rack 64 rapidly moves under the projectile 50. This causes the projectile 50 to spin rapidly. As the gear rack 64 moves, the pull tab 70 eventually contacts the projectile 50. The pull tab 70 has an inclined surface 76 that strikes the projectile 50 and launches it into flight while it is spinning. The forward projection away from the holding trough 62 and the rapid rotation creates a Magnus force that helps to keep the projectile 50 in flight. As previously mentioned, the projectile 50 tends to fly up and around in a looping flight path.
It will be understood that the embodiments of the present invention that are illustrated and described are merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art can make many variations to those embodiments. All such embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
36968 | Shaler | Nov 1862 | A |
383512 | Barber | May 1888 | A |
1091512 | Hoffman | Mar 1914 | A |
1262060 | Kristofek | Apr 1918 | A |
1457674 | Kennedy | Jun 1923 | A |
2167992 | Olsen | Aug 1939 | A |
2279766 | Truesdell | Apr 1942 | A |
3717136 | Gay et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
4016854 | Lehman | Apr 1977 | A |
4335701 | Bozich | Jun 1982 | A |
4452007 | Martin | Jun 1984 | A |
5613482 | Thai | Mar 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170045327 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |