This invention relates generally to the protection of mail handlers from hazardous material contained in letters or mail parcels, and, more particularly, to a limiting means to deter the placement of such hazardous material or nuisance objects into the collection boxes of the mail system.
Incidents of anthrax laced letters being transported through the United States Postal Service (USPS) facilities to unsuspecting recipients has increased awareness of the potential for terrorists and other criminals to use the mail system as a delivery mechanism for large scale introduction of biologics, chemicals, explosives, and other hazardous materials to create chaos or to harm an intended set of victims. There appears to be no current security devices or procedures that are available to provide a limiting means to deter use of the mail system as a way to deliver harmful materials, especially during the initial phases of mail handling or processing. The same deterrent means could be utilized to prevent the placement of nuisance objects, such as soda and beer cans, bottles, or rocks, from being placed in the collection box.
The current opening size for depositing mail into the typical collection box located on a street corner is about 6 inches by 15 inches. Most mail deposited into such a collection box comprise business size envelopes, which are approximately 4⅛ inches by 9½ inches, or smaller sized envelopes. Therefore, the current opening size is larger than required for most, if not all, mail deposited with the postal system through collection boxes. Use of a smaller sized opening would restrict the size of object which could be deposited into the collection boxes.
U.S. Pat. No. 659,486, issued Oct. 9, 1900, to W. H. Mulloy, discloses a mail box having stationary projecting guides with suitable incline for an article to pass therethrough into the mail box and a pivotal cover that covers the stationary projecting guides when in the closed position and exposes the stationary projecting guides when in the open position.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,368,226, issued Nov. 29, 1994, to L. Franceschino, discloses a planar frame element for framing an interior opening of the mail slot.
The present invention is a device for limiting the size and shape of mail which may be deposited into a mail drop box. The drop box includes an enclosure having a deposit port at its upper end and of a predetermined size and shape, and a collection chamber below the deposit port. There is a pivotal door having at most substantially the same size and shape as the deposit port and closing the deposit port when the door is in a first, closed position and opening the deposit port when the door is in a second, open position. A plate is disposed in the enclosure between the deposit port and the collection chamber and of a substantially similar size and shape as the deposit port and having a restricted size opening and located to be exposed when the pivotal door in the open position to restrict the size of the deposit port to the restricted size opening. The door and the plate may be attached to each other at an angle so that as the door is moved to the open position, the restricted size opening in the plate closes the deposit port and prevents objects from being placed into the drop box that do not fit through the restricted size opening. The plate may include a first planar portion having the restricted size opening and a second portion adapted for affixing the plate to the drop box and the plate may be adapted for affixing to the pivotal door or to the enclosure.
The present invention includes a shaped member having two planar elements. The shaped member may be formed from one plate bent to a predetermined angle α or comprised of two plates conventionally joined along one edge forming the predetermined angle α. One planar element includes an aperture of a size designed to accept the maximum mail piece size desired for deposit into the collection box. The planar element is preferably of a size slightly larger than the opening (about 6 inches by 15 inches) in the collection box such that when the door of the collection box is opened the aperture is the only opening for mail to be deposited into the collection box. The mail limiting device is conventional joined to the collection box door or door counterbalance plate.
For a better understanding of the present invention reference is made to the accompanying drawings and detailed description.
Referring to
In determining the appropriate angle α for a given collection box, one of ordinary skill in the art will account for combined effects of mail limiting device being attached to the door of the collection box door, such as, for example, total weight, balance, and rotational limitations (e.g., obstructions) of the door. The shaped member 60 is preferably make of material (such as metal, composites, polymers, or wood) compatible with the door 16 for joining purposes.
One embodiment of the plates forming the plate 62 and flange 64 is shown as rectangular, but any geometric shape is acceptable. Plate 62 includes opening or aperture 66 of a size designed to accept the maximum mail piece size desired for deposit into the collection box 10. Most mail deposited into such a collection box include, for example, business size envelopes, which are approximately 4⅛ inches by 9½ inches, or smaller sized envelopes. However, if desired an aperture 66 can be shaped to accommodate any size letter or parcel. The aperture 66 is shown as rectangular, but any geometric shape is acceptable. Plate 62 is preferably of a size slightly larger than the opening (about 6 inches by 15 inches) of the deposit port 14 in the collection box 10 such that when the door 16 of the collection box 10 is opened the aperture 66 is the only opening for mail to be deposited in the collection box 10 as shown in
In operation, door 16 is pulled open by the customer, as shown in
In this manner, business-sized envelopes for example, which is the majority type of mail deposited in a typical corner collection box, can be easily deposited in a collection box fitted with the present invention, but larger items will not be able to be deposited. There is a chute 80 which directs mail deposited into inlet 12 into container 78.
The inlet 12 at the other side from deposit port 14 is arranged for deposits of mail from a vehicle, and a suitable plate 62 will usually also be placed inside of inlet 12 when mail limiting is also desired for the inlet.
Planar portions 30, 32 of door 26 are angled with respect to each other to control the movement of deposited items dropped into a drop box 20. Planar portion 30 is sized to have a distal edge 30a located proximally to closed portion 35 of top 34. Distal edge 30a remains proximal to the hemispherical shape of top 34 throughout the angle of rotation of door 26. This proximity helps prevent the placement of items into drop box 20 before door 26 and planar portion 30 are rotated clockwise and distal edge 30a clears point 36. At the angle of rotation of door 26 represented by point 36, planar portion 32 is angled to have a distal edge 32a located in proximity to the hemispherical shape of top 34. Planar portion 32 is sized to maintain distal edge 32a in proximity to closed portion 35 of top 34 while door 26 is rotated clockwise past point 36 to allow the deposition of items. This proximal relationship prevents deposited items from being passed around planar portion 32 while depository port 24 is open.
Drop box 20 further includes a plate 40 having a restricted size opening 42 similar to the previously described devices herein, which plate 40 is exposed through depository port 24 in the open position of door 26, as shown in
Thus, the present invention provides a simple mail limiting device which can be a formed piece with a slot size designed to accept the maximum mail piece size that is desired, the mail limiting device can be securely attached to the mail drop door's inner surface on currently used mail boxes. When the customer opens the door by pulling the existing handle, he has only one option for inserting the mail. Through the provided slot in the mail limiting device. Most mail pieces inducted into a corner collection box are business size envelopes 4⅛″ by 9″ or smaller. Occasionally an 8½ by 11″ envelope may be inducted. The USPS can dictate the slot size but the fact remains that it is currently too large. An added benefit of the device is that it will help reduce mail jams and direct mail more centrally into other future hardware that may be fitted to the collection boxes in the current contamination/containment efforts.
Although the invention has been described with respect to various embodiments, it should be realized this invention is also capable of a wide variety of further and other embodiments within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/368,060 filed Mar. 26, 2002 entitled MAIL LIMITING DEVICE, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
359548 | Scoville | Mar 1887 | A |
429986 | Wiegand | Jun 1890 | A |
560477 | Gaschlin | May 1896 | A |
561589 | Cook | Jun 1896 | A |
570628 | Hower | Nov 1896 | A |
652916 | Kline | Jul 1900 | A |
659486 | Mulloy | Oct 1900 | A |
787731 | Dickson | Apr 1905 | A |
1086206 | Otto | Feb 1914 | A |
1140914 | Ostachowski | May 1915 | A |
1141806 | Loudenslager | Jun 1915 | A |
2437319 | Gable et al. | Mar 1948 | A |
2829820 | Evers | Apr 1958 | A |
3519198 | Benoliel | Jul 1970 | A |
3976345 | Walters | Aug 1976 | A |
4069965 | Maddox, Jr. | Jan 1978 | A |
4333603 | Carlson | Jun 1982 | A |
4545522 | Kerzner | Oct 1985 | A |
4724999 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4895300 | Hammons et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5056711 | Bush | Oct 1991 | A |
5143284 | Socarras | Sep 1992 | A |
5333782 | Frauenberger | Aug 1994 | A |
5346086 | Harris | Sep 1994 | A |
5368226 | Franceschino | Nov 1994 | A |
5400960 | Jeffs | Mar 1995 | A |
5454332 | Fennelly et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5482208 | Johnston | Jan 1996 | A |
5597116 | Morris | Jan 1997 | A |
5617993 | Morris | Apr 1997 | A |
5624071 | Sosan | Apr 1997 | A |
5897053 | Cirimele | Apr 1999 | A |
5938113 | Kim | Aug 1999 | A |
5979751 | Maddox | Nov 1999 | A |
5992736 | Parker | Nov 1999 | A |
6234388 | Taylor | May 2001 | B1 |
6299061 | Henson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318628 | Pangburn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6375071 | Kim | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6588656 | Cox et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6644542 | Cox et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6742703 | Esakov et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20020014525 | Webb | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030019921 | Cox et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030222132 | Esakov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09173202 | Jul 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030209596 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60368060 | Mar 2002 | US |