The present invention relates generally to the measurement of mail. More particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus used to determine if a specific piece of mail complies with the dimensional requirements established by a postal carrier.
Envelopes, parcels, and other packages containing items may be shipped using postal carriers. In the past, most carriers calculated the fee to charge for the transportation of certain items, such as letters and envelopes, on the weight of the item and its container, as well as the distance the item was to be transported. Accordingly, the fee charged for the transportation of a letter or envelope would generally be based solely on the distance to be traveled and the weight of the item, regardless of the envelope's size.
Previous systems were designed to assist customers in estimating the costs associated with transporting the item simply by weighing the item. Other systems allow a customer to estimate the total costs of transportation based on the item's weight along with the originating and destination postal or zip codes.
Some carriers have begun to include size or dimensional requirements as a factor in the calculation of the transportation fees for items previously calculated solely on weight. These and other carriers may require that the dimensions of a letter or envelope fall within a specific range in order to qualify for certain rates that correspond with that range. If the length, width, and/or thickness of an envelope exceeds the maximum allowable length, width, or thickness for a class of mail, the fee required to transport the letter will increase to the rate associated with the class of mail corresponding to the dimensional range in which the letter will be categorized. In some cases, if the dimensions of a letter or envelope exceed the maximum allowable dimensions for letters, the item may be reclassified as a package for which the associated transportation fee will be greater.
In other situations, a letter may fail to qualify for a less expensive class due to the manner in which it has been folded. Folding the letter in a different manner, however, may allow it to qualify for the less expensive class. For instance, if a postal carrier has established a maximum thickness for a class of mail, folding a multi-page letter several times may cause the thickness of the enclosing envelope to exceed the maximum allowable thickness for that class. Instead, folding the letter in halves or not at all and placing the letter in a wider and/or longer envelope may allow the letter to qualify for the less expensive class. Prior measurement devices, however, do not allow the user to determine that different arrangements would be more cost-effective.
The present invention recognizes and addresses the foregoing considerations, and others, of prior art construction and methods. In this regard, one aspect of the invention provides a mail measurement apparatus comprising a generally flat rectangular prism having a number of sides, a front surface, and a back surface, wherein one side defines an indentation having a depth and a breadth. The depth and the breadth correspond to a set of maximum dimensional requirements established by a postal carrier for a class of mail.
According to another aspect, the present invention also provides a mail measurement apparatus comprising a generally rectangular prism having a bottom surface, a top surface, a front surface, a back surface, and two side surfaces. At least a portion of the top surface is open. The generally rectangular prism defines a volume having a width, length, and height. The width, length, and height correspond to a set of maximum dimensional requirements established by a postal carrier for a class of mail.
A further aspect of the present invention provides a method for determining compliance with a set of maximum dimensional requirements established by a postal carrier by placing a side of a generally flat rectangular prism mail measurement apparatus against a flat substrate. The first surface defines a first indentation, which, along with the flat surface, defines a gap having a height and a width. The dimensions of the gap correspond to the dimensional requirements established by a postal carrier for a specific class of mail. Another step of the method is sliding a piece of mail widthwise through the gap to determine compliance with the dimensional requirements.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended drawings, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent same or analogous features or elements of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to presently preferred embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit thereof. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In operation, one of sides 12, 14, 16, or 18 is placed against a flat substrate, thereby creating a gap defined between the substrate and the respective indentation. The gaps, either alone or in combination, correspond to the maximum allowable dimensions for specific classes of mail that have been established by a postal carrier. For example, a postal carrier may require a letter to have a maximum width of a, a maximum length of b, and a maximum thickness of c in order to qualify for the class of mail associated with the least expensive rates. As shown most clearly in
Width a associated with the same class of mail, however, may equate to breadth 24b of the gap created by indentation 24 when side 12 is placed against tabletop 27. The user then rotates apparatus 10, places side 12 against tabletop 27, rotates the letter ninety degrees, and attempts to pass it through the gap defined by indentation 24 and the tabletop. If the letter is able to pass through the gap, it also satisfied the width requirement (width a) for that specific class of mail. Accordingly, it should be understood that the depths and breadths of indentations 22, 24, 26, and 28 may apply to the width, length, and thickness of one or more different classes of mail. Additionally, the widths, lengths, and thicknesses for different classes of mail may overlap.
If the letter is unable to fit through the gaps created by indentations 24 or 26 when sides 16 or 12 are placed against the flat substrate, respectively, the user may nonetheless be able to refold or rearrange the letter to allow it to qualify for the same class of mail. If the letter is too wide or too long, the user may be able to refold the letter to fit in an envelope having an acceptable width and length. If the letter is too thick, the user may be able to lessen the letter's thickness by folding the letter fewer times and by placing the letter in an envelope having a larger width and/or length.
Specifically, a postal carrier may establish dimensional requirements that limit the thickness of mail but permit use of envelopes of varying lengths and widths. Accordingly, a letter that exceeds the maximum thickness allowed because it has been folded too many times to fit in a small envelope may be folded fewer times in order to fit in a larger envelope. As a result, while the envelope exhibits a larger surface area, it exhibits a smaller thickness and thus qualifies for the less expensive class of mail. For example, a postal carrier may establish a maximum thickness corresponding to depth 26a for one class of mail and a maximum thickness greater than depth 26a for another class of mail. If an envelope is thinner than depth 26a, it falls within the less expensive class, but if it is thicker than depth 26a, it falls within the more expensive class. The maximum length and width for the two classes both correspond to breadth 22a. Accordingly, envelopes that exhibit a length and width corresponding to breadth 26b and 24b respectively (referred to as a “small envelope” for simplicity) would qualify for both classes depending on the thickness of the letter contained in the envelope. Likewise, envelopes exhibiting a length and width corresponding to breadth 26b and 22b (referred to as a “large envelope” for simplicity) would also qualify for both classes of mail depending on its thickness. A multi-page letter placed in a small envelope would need to be folded a greater number of times than would be needed if the same letter is placed in a large envelope. As such, when placed in the small envelope, the letter may not be able to pass through the gap created by indentation 26 when side 16 is placed against a flat substrate. Thus, the letter would not qualify for the less expensive class of mail. Removing the letter from the small envelope and placing it in the large envelope, however, will require that the letter be folded fewer times. As a result, the large envelope is thinner than the small envelope and able to pass through the gaps created by indentations 24 or 22 when sides 12 or 14, respectively, are placed against a flat substrate. Consequently, this allows the large envelope to qualify for the less expensive class in a situation where the small envelope would not. Apparatus 10 allows users, who would not intuitively recognize that refolding a letter to fit in a larger envelope would produce a more economical result, to reduce the amount spent on the transportation costs of letters and other mail.
In operation, long side 14 is placed against a flat substrate, such as a tabletop, so that indentation 22 defines a gap between apparatus 10 and the flat surface. Depth 22a defines a thickness of the gap, while breadth 22b defines the length of the gap. The gap's thickness and length correspond to the thickness and length of the maximum allowable requirements for a specific class of mail established by a postal carrier. The user attempts to slide an envelope through the gap defined by indentation 22 and the substrate. The letter will be unable to pass through the gap if it is either too long or too thick. As a result, the letter will not be cataloged in the class of mail to which the dimensions of the gap correspond, but will instead be associated with a more expensive class of mail. Apparatus 10 may be constructed out of plastic, such as polyurethane, wood, metal, or any other sufficiently rigid material capable of creating a gap that corresponds to specific dimensions when the apparatus is placed against a flat substrate.
In operation, the user tries to pass a letter through the slot that equates to the dimensions of the class of mail in which the user wishes to send a corresponding letter. For example, if the maximum allowable length, width, and thickness for a class of mail equate to breadth 26b, breadth 24b, and depth 26a, the user tests the length and thickness of an envelope containing the letter by passing it through slot 34. The user then tests the width of the letter by rotating it and passing it through slot 32. If the envelope passes through both slots, it qualifies for the less expensive class of mail.
Similar to that described above, if the envelope is too thick to pass through slot 34, the letter may be unfolded and refolded fewer times so that it's able to fit in a larger envelope that qualifies for the same class of mail. For example, the letter may be refolded to fit within an envelope whose length and width correspond to breadth 24b and 22b respectively. As a result, the letter is able to fit through slots 30 and 32 and, thus, qualifies for the class of mail associated with less transportation costs.
Referring again to
Apparatus 50 defines an internal space within the apparatus that is delimited by specific dimensions, the width and thickness of which correspond to the breadth and depth of the opening in top surface 62 (i.e., 62a and 62b, respectively). The length of the internal space corresponds to the height of sides 56 and 58. Thus, it should be understood that the internal space defined by apparatus 50 exhibits a volume delimited by particular dimensions which correspond to the various surfaces of the apparatus.
The internal space defined by apparatus 50 corresponds to the specific width, length, and thickness maximums established by a postal carrier for a specific class of mail. It should therefore be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the size of apparatus 50 can easily be altered so that these dimensions and the corresponding area defined by the apparatus's internal space can be easily configured to meet any specific dimensional requirements. In fact, several similar rectangular prisms of varying dimensions can be used in combination to represent the different maximum dimensional requirements established for a class of mail.
In operation, the user attempts to place an envelope into apparatus 50 to determine whether the envelope complies with the dimensional requirements established by the postal carrier. If the envelope fails to fit within apparatus 50, the user understands that he must either rearrange the letter and/or envelope to fit within the apparatus or must be prepared to send the envelope in a different class of mail. In the scenario where a postal carrier has established several dimensional maximums for a class of mail, the user may attempt to fit the envelope in different apparatuses corresponding to these dimensions in order to determine if it complies with any one of the established dimensions.
In another embodiment, several apparatuses similar to apparatus 50 that delimit the various dimensional maximums established by a postal carrier for a class of mail may be affixed to one another. The user is then able to quickly determine if an envelope complies with any of the established requirements by attempting to fit the envelope into each apparatus. If the envelope fails to fit in any one of the apparatuses, the user understands that either the envelope will not be categorized within that specific class of mail or he must reconfigure the envelope of letter to fit within one of the apparatuses.
Referring again to
While one or more preferred embodiments of the invention have been described above, it should be understood that any and all equivalent realizations of the present invention are included within the scope and spirit thereof. The embodiments depicted are presented by way of example only and are not intended as limitations upon the present invention. Thus, it should be understood by those of ordinary skill in this art that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments since modifications can be made. Therefore, it is contemplated that any and all such embodiments are included in the present invention as may fall within the scope and spirit thereof.
The present application claims the benefit of the United States provisional application filed on May 7, 2007 by John B. Butler for “Mailslotter” (Ser. No. 60/916,486), the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
387284 | Dupee | Aug 1888 | A |
2048090 | Zieger | Jul 1936 | A |
2389842 | Cummins | Nov 1945 | A |
3318006 | Martinez | May 1967 | A |
4607433 | Meeker | Aug 1986 | A |
5031332 | Newman | Jul 1991 | A |
5152122 | DeBarber et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5584125 | Prete | Dec 1996 | A |
5727692 | Large et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
20070288402 | Collings | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080301065 | Fajour | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301964 | Jordan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2246706 | Mar 2000 | CA |
9305197 | Aug 1993 | DE |
9307878 | Oct 1993 | DE |
4328579 | Mar 1995 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60916486 | May 2007 | US |