The invention disclosed herein relates to containers, and more particularly to a mailpiece container adapted for accepting and stacking mixed mail therein which is sorted into route sequence. The invention also describes a method for stacking mail into such containers using a mixed mail sorter.
The 2003 Presidential Commission Report on the Future of the USPS concluded that the Postal Service should continue to develop effective merging systems that optimize efficiency, e.g., maximize the number of mailpieces shipped with each mile traveled, while minimizing the labor content associated with mailpiece handling. With respect to the latter, all elements of the mail stream (letters, flats, periodicals, post cards, etc.) should be sorted, merged, and/or sequenced at a centralized location with the expectation that no subsequent handling would be required at each of the local postal branch offices, other than the physical delivery to the recipient address.
Most postal services are actively exploring opportunities to reduce the overall cost of processing mail by investing in postal automation equipment and employing state-of-the-art materials management techniques to improve efficiencies in the various process steps. In some instances, the savings from automation equipment may be, unfortunately, offset by increases in transportation costs.
Sorting equipment typically loads mailpieces by a gravity feed chute which drops mailpieces vertically into mail trays arranged below the chute. Occasionally, especially as the mail trays are nearly completely filled, portions of the mailpieces do not settle properly and partially protrude/extend above the top of the tray. As such, a substantial risk is incurred that the protruding mailpiece will catch on mechanisms related to the automated processing equipment, e.g., one of the tray transporting, storing, and/or retrieving systems. It will, therefore, be appreciated that such interference can damage the mailpiece or, alternatively, require system shut down to rectify the problem/obstruction. Further, the overall efficiency of the mail sortation system is adversely affected by these stacking errors.
Stacking errors can occur as a result of a variety non-optimum conditions and/or under a variety of circumstances. In one instance, a non-uniform thickness profile of the stacked envelopes can lead to one side of the stack being higher in the tray than the opposing side. In yet other instances, the stacking of mixed mail, e.g., a combination of flats-, letter-, and postcard-sized mailpieces, can result in a similar inconsistent or non-level stack profile. It will be appreciated that when mixed mail is aligned along at least one edge, letter and postcard-sized envelopes, which may be less than one-half the length of flats mailpieces, will leave a thickness void in regions where a flat envelope would otherwise extend the full length and maintain uniform thickness of the stack.
To address the difficulties associated with stacking errors, mailpiece equipment manufacturers have typically employed one of two known methods/solutions. Firstly, the tray capacity may be limited to about 70% of the total potential capacity. As such, the probability that a mailpiece will protrude beyond the bounds of the container is significantly diminished. Many of the current sorters are equipped with sensors to determine when the height of the mailpiece stack reaches seventy percent (70%) of full level. Secondly, sensors may be deployed throughout the tray transport system to detect when or if mailpieces protrude beyond the top of the container/tray. Trays which have been over-filled are typically diverted to a secondary track for an operator to manually correct the stacking error and return the tray to the primary or principle track.
While these solutions eliminate difficulties associated with equipment jamming or malfunction, the mailpiece container trays are not filled to full capacity. As a result, the containers are shipped with thirty percent (30%) of its volume in air rather than in mailpiece content material. Additionally, the labor cost in operating multi-million dollar sorting equipment remains high due to the human intervention required to correct the stacking errors.
A need, therefore, exists for a system and method to accommodate mixed mail, including mail of inconsistent thickness, to optimally fill mail containers/trays.
The accompanying drawings illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
a-3c depict side views of a first embodiment of the inventive system in various operational positions, the system including a containment device, a transport mechanism for conveying the escort assemblies over and into an open end of the containment device, and a detachment mechanism.
a-6c depict a side view of a second embodiment of the inventive system including an interim container for accepting mailpieces from the escort assemblies and depositing the stacked mailpieces into a secondary or subsequent mailpiece container.
A system is provided for stacking mail having an escort assembly for handling each mailpiece. The system comprises a containment device, a transport mechanism and a detachment mechanism. The containment device includes a base, vertical walls extending from the base and an open end for accepting the mailpieces therein. The containment device, furthermore, has a slot formed in at least one of the vertical walls thereof. The transport mechanism includes first and second transport segment, the first transport segment conveying escort assemblies and respective mailpieces over an open end of the containment device and the second transport segment lowering the escort assemblies and respective mailpieces into the open end of the containment device. The transport mechanism furthermore aligns the edges of the mailpieces along one of the vertical walls of the containment device and positions the escort assembly through the slot of the containment device. The detachment mechanism is operative to release the mailpieces from the respective escort assembly and move the escort assemblies through the slot of the containment device.
The present invention is described in the context of a mixed mail sorter for sorting mailpieces and then automatically stacking them into a plurality of mail trays. While the invention is advantageous for mixed mail sorters, it should be appreciated, that the system and method for stacking mailpieces is applicable to any apparatus which may employ an escort assembly for securing, conveying and depositing objects into a container, whether the container is intended for delivering mail, storing objects and/or stacking objects/mail in a containment device.
The invention describes a system for stacking mail into a containment device wherein the mail previously sorted may be stacked after sorting is completed. In the context used herein, the term “containment device” means a container for stacking mail along at least one edge, whether or not the container is used in the transport of mail, i.e., in a transport vehicle, or an interim container used to stack/align the mail and subsequently depositing the mailpieces in yet another transport container. Furthermore, the invention describes various modifications made to such a containment device for use in combination with a mixed mail sorter. That is, inasmuch as mixed mail sorters of the type described utilize a plurality of escort assemblies to secure, divert, transport and release objects/mailpieces into the containment device, various structural modifications are made to accommodate automated stacking therein. Moreover, such modifications may be made to maintain alignment of the objects/mailpieces while being transported i.e., subject to abrupt accelerations and/or vibrations during vehicle transport.
Co-pending, commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/487,202 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Positioning Objects/Mailpieces” describes an apparatus for centering objects/mailpieces within an escort/clamp assembly for use in a mixed mail sorter. The mixed-mail sorter is described in greater detail in co-pending, commonly owned US patent applications:
In
In addition to its principle mechanical functions, the clamp assembly 14 may also include a unique identifier 18, e.g., a barcode or RFID chip, to uniquely identify the clamp. As such, the sorting operation may be directed by a controller using a combination of requisite information, i.e., electronically scanned information in connection with the mailpiece (for example, its destination address) together with the unique identifier of the escort assembly. Further, the sorting process may be performed without altering/marking the mailpiece 12 such as via a printed barcode symbology or other identification mark.
In the broadest sense of the invention and referring to
Referring additionally to
Inasmuch as the transport container 16T will be used repeatedly, it will be necessary for its construction to be sufficiently robust for continuous use in a delivery capacity. More specifically, the transport container 16T includes a base 16B, vertical walls 16V extending from the base 16B and an open end 160 for accepting the mailpieces (not shown in
Returning to
In addition to changing the planar orientation of the clamp assemblies, the second transport segment 34 is operative to place the clamp assemblies 14 through the vertical slot 16S of the transport container 16T. That is, a portion of each clamp assembly extends through the slot 16S such that the mailpiece 12 nearly abuts one side of the slotted vertical wall 16V while an outboard portion of the clamp assembly 14 passes through the vertical wall 16V. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the width dimension of the vertical slot 16S is dictated by the corresponding width dimension of the clamp assemblies 14.
In
To prevent the mailpieces 12 from falling a vertical distance within the transport container 16T, i.e., to the base of the container, and misalignment of the mailpieces 12 as a consequence thereof, the transport container 16T may be positioned to minimize the vertical distance from the clamp assembly 14 to the base 16B of the transport container 16T or to the top of the cumulating stack. More specifically, a mechanism 60, coupled to the transport container 16T, may be employed to raise and/or lower the transport container to ensure that the fill level of the mailpiece stack is consistent with the vertical height of the detachment mechanism 40. Consequently, the mailpieces 12 may be stacked, one on top of another, in a controlled manner, falling only a small vertical distance upon their release from the detachment mechanism.
Additionally, the rate of descent of the transport container 16T may be controlled by a processor 62 based upon previously measured and stored mailpiece thickness information. That is, the system 20 of the present invention may be used in combination with a thickness profile measurement device, such as that disclosed in commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/441,988 entitled, “METHOD FOR OPTIMALLY LOADING OBJECTS INTO STORAGE/TRANSPORT CONTAINERS”. The subject matter thereof is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. More specifically, the thickness measurement data obtained from the thickness measurement device may be stored in memory and used by the processor 62 to calculate the fill rate of the container 16T. If, for example, the container 16T is to be filled by a plurality of relatively thick magazines and newspapers, the rate of descent may be increased to accommodate the increased fill rate of the mailpieces 12 deposited in the container 16T. On the other hand, if relatively thin conventional envelopes are the representative mix of mail entering the transport container 16T, then the descent rate may be decreased to allow a sufficient thickness of mailpieces 12 to develop before moving the transport container 16T downward.
In yet another embodiment of the invention and referring to
Referring to
While the interim container 16I may be lowered into the mailpiece container 16C, it should be appreciated that either or both containers 16I, 16C may be spatially positioned to minimize the vertical distance from the trap doors 16PB1, 16PB2 of the interim container 16I to the base 16B of the mailpiece container. After releasing the accumulator stack of mailpieces into container 16C, the interim container is moved back to its initial position, the trap doors 16PBI and 16PB2 rotated open so that interim container 16I is ready to begin receiving the next batch of mail to be stacked. The filled container 16C is removed and replaced with an empty container.
When the mailpieces 12 have been stacked and aligned along an edge or vertical wall of the transport or mailpiece containers 16T, 16C, it is generally desirable to retain alignment of the mailpieces 12. In
It is to be understood that all of the present figures, and the accompanying narrative discussions of preferred embodiments, do not purport to be completely rigorous treatments of the methods and systems under consideration. A person skilled in the art will understand that the steps of the present application represent general cause-and-effect relationships that do not exclude intermediate interactions of various types, and will further understand that the various structures and mechanisms described in this application can be implemented by a variety of different combinations of hardware and software, and in various configurations which need not be further elaborated herein.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/487,203, filed on Jul. 13, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,261, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2852157 | Frater | Sep 1958 | A |
2994457 | Fornas | Aug 1961 | A |
3113680 | Frater et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3137499 | Maidment | Jun 1964 | A |
3170594 | Nascher | Feb 1965 | A |
3341063 | Voorhees, Jr. | Sep 1967 | A |
3404804 | Frater et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3420368 | Sorrells | Jan 1969 | A |
3452509 | Hauer | Jul 1969 | A |
3478892 | Lockwood | Nov 1969 | A |
3498494 | Voorhees, Jr. | Mar 1970 | A |
3534866 | Asenbauer | Oct 1970 | A |
3549145 | Trautmann | Dec 1970 | A |
3587856 | Lemelson | Jun 1971 | A |
RE27649 | Levenhagen | May 1973 | E |
3750892 | Grosse | Aug 1973 | A |
3757939 | Henig | Sep 1973 | A |
3889811 | Yoshimura | Jun 1975 | A |
3901797 | Storace | Aug 1975 | A |
3904516 | Chiba | Sep 1975 | A |
3905896 | Jackson | Sep 1975 | A |
3933094 | Murphy | Jan 1976 | A |
4008813 | Leersnijder | Feb 1977 | A |
4058217 | Vaughan | Nov 1977 | A |
4106636 | Ouimet | Aug 1978 | A |
4139098 | Mollon | Feb 1979 | A |
D251586 | Levenhagen | Apr 1979 | S |
4169529 | Hunter | Oct 1979 | A |
4244672 | Lund | Jan 1981 | A |
4320894 | Reist | Mar 1982 | A |
4371157 | Hunt | Feb 1983 | A |
4445681 | Reist | May 1984 | A |
4498664 | Reist | Feb 1985 | A |
4507739 | Haruki | Mar 1985 | A |
4550837 | Simmons | Nov 1985 | A |
4550905 | Heiland | Nov 1985 | A |
4570798 | Wilson | Feb 1986 | A |
4627540 | Takeda | Dec 1986 | A |
4641753 | Tamada | Feb 1987 | A |
4688678 | Zue | Aug 1987 | A |
4738368 | Shaw | Apr 1988 | A |
4757890 | Motoda | Jul 1988 | A |
4836354 | Motoda | Jun 1989 | A |
4868570 | Davis | Sep 1989 | A |
4874281 | Bergerioux | Oct 1989 | A |
4891088 | Svyatsky | Jan 1990 | A |
4895242 | Michel | Jan 1990 | A |
4905986 | Muller | Mar 1990 | A |
4921107 | Hofer | May 1990 | A |
4923022 | Hsieh | May 1990 | A |
4965829 | Lemelson | Oct 1990 | A |
4987634 | Weihrauch | Jan 1991 | A |
5031223 | Rosenbaum | Jul 1991 | A |
5042667 | Keough | Aug 1991 | A |
5071008 | Hradisky | Dec 1991 | A |
5119954 | Svyatsky | Jun 1992 | A |
5144895 | Murray | Sep 1992 | A |
5186336 | Pippin | Feb 1993 | A |
5226641 | Schieleit | Jul 1993 | A |
5291002 | Agnew | Mar 1994 | A |
5295674 | Zoltner | Mar 1994 | A |
5370382 | Wetter | Dec 1994 | A |
5413324 | Flade | May 1995 | A |
5425837 | Hansch | Jun 1995 | A |
5445397 | Evans | Aug 1995 | A |
5470427 | Mikel | Nov 1995 | A |
5480032 | Pippin | Jan 1996 | A |
5503388 | Guenther et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5549359 | Hoss et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5667078 | Walach | Sep 1997 | A |
5718321 | Brugger | Feb 1998 | A |
5772391 | Sjogren et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797249 | Hartness | Aug 1998 | A |
5860527 | Frankenberg et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881902 | Ackermann | Mar 1999 | A |
5981891 | Yamashita | Nov 1999 | A |
6047853 | Frankenberg | Apr 2000 | A |
6062388 | Ohayon | May 2000 | A |
6126017 | Hours | Oct 2000 | A |
6170689 | Flesher et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189695 | Ching-rong | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6227378 | Jones | May 2001 | B1 |
6276509 | Schuster | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6347710 | Ryan | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365862 | Miller | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394274 | Cheeseman | May 2002 | B1 |
6394449 | Reist | May 2002 | B1 |
6403906 | De Leo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435353 | Ryan | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6435583 | Reist | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443311 | Hendrickson | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464067 | Reist | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6527122 | Taylor | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561339 | Olson | May 2003 | B1 |
6561360 | Kalm | May 2003 | B1 |
6612563 | Nole, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6634846 | Enenkel | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6677548 | Robu | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6726201 | Studer | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746202 | Mader | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747231 | Bretschneider | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749268 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6762384 | Kechel | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6814210 | Hendzel | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6880705 | Otting et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897395 | Shiibashi | May 2005 | B2 |
6946612 | Morikawa | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953906 | Burns | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976675 | Gosslinghoff | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6994220 | Schererz | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004396 | Quine | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7111742 | Zimmermann | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7112031 | Harres | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138596 | Pippin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170024 | Burns | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210893 | Overman | May 2007 | B1 |
7227094 | Oexle | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235756 | De Leo | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7259346 | Svyatsky | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304260 | Boller | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7378610 | Umezawa | May 2008 | B2 |
7396011 | Svyatsky | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397010 | Wilke | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397011 | Berdelle-Hilge | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7527261 | Stemmle | May 2009 | B2 |
7721891 | Dubois | May 2010 | B2 |
D621619 | Ripoll | Aug 2010 | S |
7784615 | Stahl | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7954816 | Freitag et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020053533 | Brehm | May 2002 | A1 |
20020125177 | Burns | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139726 | Roth | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153228 | Kramer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006174 | Harres | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030079626 | Yoshitani | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111468 | Kao | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030136713 | Lopez | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030155282 | Kechel | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030208298 | Edmonds | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209473 | Brinkley | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218296 | Honegger | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218297 | Honegger | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007510 | Kechel | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050025340 | Hickman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096783 | Mileaf et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161875 | Yuyama et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050189270 | Lindenmayer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222708 | Wisniewski | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060070929 | Fry | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124512 | Quine | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060180520 | Ehrat | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191822 | Avant | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060237341 | McDade | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070090029 | Avant | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070131593 | Burns | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070194519 | Belanger | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070272601 | Cormack | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080011653 | Stemmle | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012211 | Stemmle | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027986 | Stemmle | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080093273 | Stemmle | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093274 | Stemmle | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080164185 | Stemmle | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090230614 | Meier | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100270125 | Bijl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1159088 | Jun 1989 | JP |
1271789 | Oct 1989 | JP |
9404287 | Mar 1994 | WO |
0108817 | Aug 2001 | WO |
PCTUS200504406 | Jun 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2005044560 | Jun 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2005044413 | Jun 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006012861 | Oct 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006012888 | Oct 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006012892 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090152811 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11487203 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12390103 | US |