The present invention relates to the field of mail-handling, and it relates more particularly to an improved drive member designed to equip a mailpiece conveyor device of a mailpiece feed device for a mail-handling machine.
Postal specifications that govern printing of postal imprints are very precise and, in particular, they define the position of such an imprint relative to the top edge of the envelope. Printing the imprint in that position requires the envelope to be properly jogged. Since the envelope is conveyed parallel to a referencing wall (or “jogging” wall), any defective jogging in the feed magazine (or feeder) causes the same defect downstream in the selector device, and then still further downstream as the envelope goes through the print module for printing the postal imprint. It is thus very important for such defective jogging to be monitored and corrected automatically in order to avoid systematic manual re-jogging by the operator on inserting a stack of envelopes into the feeder.
Nowadays, in order to solve that problem, it is known that the conveyor rollers of the feeder can be inclined so that, by conveying the envelopes diagonally, said envelopes can be shifted towards the referencing wall while also being conveyed downstream towards the selector device. Unfortunately, by exerting a considerable re-jogging force on the envelope, such a configuration brakes said envelope and, when the envelope is a thin envelope, can even damage it. In addition, the force exerted depends on the position of each conveyor roller relative to the selector device.
In addition to the conveyor rollers that are disposed parallel to the referencing wall, the Applicant has already proposed to add re-jogging rollers that are disposed perpendicularly to the conveyor rollers and that operate with a phase advance relative thereto.
Unfortunately, and although to a lesser extent than with the preceding configuration, there remains a tendency for the envelopes to be braked due to the action of the re-jogging rollers, and the taller and/or the heavier the stack of envelopes, the greater the extent to which they tend to be braked.
An object of the present invention is therefore to mitigate the above-mentioned drawbacks by means of a mailpiece feed device that has specific drive members enabling the jogging of the mailpieces to be monitored and corrected. Another object of the invention is to propose a device that is particularly tolerant of improper positioning of the stacks of envelopes placed on the feeder.
These objects are achieved with a feeder for a mail-handling machine, which feeder has a mailpiece-receiving deck, a longitudinal referencing wall, at least one row of drive rollers comprising at least first and second drive rollers standing proud through said mailpiece-receiving deck, and a suitable drive mechanism for controlling said at least one row of drive rollers, said first and second drive rollers being inclined towards said longitudinal referencing wall at an angle a relative to a perpendicular to said longitudinal referencing wall, wherein said at least one row of drive rollers has means for driving said second drive roller in rotation with a first predetermined delay relative to said first drive roller which is the closer to said longitudinal referencing wall.
Thus, by means of this particular structure of the drive rollers, the envelopes are not brought suddenly into abutment against the referencing wall, but rather they pivot without coming into abutment in order to come into the conveying direction.
Advantageously, said first drive roller is constituted by a cylindrical wheel mounted on a wheel rim having a hub provided with a pusher abutment suitable for acting, after said first predetermined delay, to transmit drive torque to a drive abutment on said second drive roller. Said pusher abutment of said first drive roller and said drive abutment of said second drive roller are axially overlapping and, at rest, have a first predetermined angular offset between them. Said first predetermined angular offset is given by the following formula: R1°=(xα/nd)360°; where x is the distance between said first and second drive rollers, and d is the diameter of said drive rollers.
Preferably, said at least one row further comprises a third drive roller and said third drive roller is driven in rotation with a second predetermined delay relative to said second drive roller.
Advantageously, said second drive roller is constituted by a cylindrical wheel mounted on a wheel rim having a hub that has a pusher abutment on a face opposite from said drive abutment, which pusher abutment is suitable for acting, after said second predetermined delay, to transmit drive torque to a drive abutment of said third drive roller. Said pusher abutment of said second drive roller and said drive abutment of said third drive roller are axially overlapping and, at rest, have a second predetermined angular offset between them. Said second predetermined angular offset is given by the following formula: R2°=(yα/nd)360°; where y is the distance between said second and third drive rollers and d is the diameter of said drive rollers. Preferably, said first, second, and third drive rollers are disposed equidistantly so that said first and second angular offsets are identical.
In a preferred embodiment, the conveyor device of the invention has three parallel rows, each of which comprises three drive rollers.
Advantageously, a return spring is provided that is designed to urge the drive rollers back into their original positions, and that has each of its ends fastened into a respective groove or orifice designed for receiving it respectively in said pusher abutment and in said drive abutment. Clearance j is also provided between said return spring and a common rotary shaft for said drive rollers so that said common rotary shaft is not clamped during compression of the spring.
Preferably, said clearance is obtained by reducing the diameter of said common rotary shaft which interconnects two successive drive rollers.
The invention can be better understood from the following detailed description given with non-limiting illustrative examples, and with reference to the following figures, in which:
A mailpiece feed device (or feeder) incorporating a conveyor device of the invention for a mail-handling machine is shown in
In accordance with the invention, said rollers 16 of the conveyor device are disposed in line in at least one row (in three parallel rows in this example) inclined at an angle of inclination a (typically lying in the range 10° to 40°) relative to a perpendicular to a reference wall 20 of the feeder and, as shown more particularly in
More precisely, each of the rows of rollers comprises at least two rollers (three rollers in this example), the roller that is closer or closest to the referencing wall being provided with the pusher abutment 30, the immediately following roller then having the drive abutment 32, these two abutments being axially overlapping in the manner of a jaw clutch but while having a predetermined angular offset (preferably less than 100°) between them at rest, so that the first roller turning causes the second roller to be turned only after a time delay depending on said offset and on the speed of rotation of the common shaft 28, when the pusher abutment of the first roller comes into contact with the drive abutment of the second roller.
Similarly, when, as shown, the row has three equidistant rollers rather than two, the second roller also has a pusher abutment 30 on the face of its hub 26 that is opposite from the hub face that has the drive abutment 32, which pusher abutment is suitable for co-operating in similar manner with a drive abutment 32 of the third roller, the predetermined angular offset existing at rest between these two abutments being identical to the preceding angular offset. Naturally, this configuration may be repeated with further successive rollers if the row has more than three rollers.
As shown in the example in
Naturally, the angular values of the first and second sectors are given merely by way of indication (they are also different from one roller to another when the angular offset is different), the essential requirement being to comply with a predetermined angular offset between the two abutments, and more precisely between the transmission surface 30A of the pusher abutment and the driven surface 32A of the drive abutment. For any given inclination a of the rollers, the value of said predetermined offset is given by the following generic formula R°=(kα/nd)360°, where k is the distance (x or y in
The wheels are made of a material that is chosen with regard to the technical specifications (abrasion, friction, elasticity, hardness) expected from the drive, i.e. with a coefficient of friction that is sufficient to enable mailpieces to be driven towards the selector device. Such a material is, for example, silicone, natural rubber, polyurethane, or indeed ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM). Conversely, the wheel rim and its hub may be made of a low-cost material, e.g. of a material based on polyoxymethylene (POM).
The conveyor device operates as follows. With a first batch of envelopes being dumped in a stack on the mailpiece-receiving deck without worrying about aligning it against the referencing wall 20, switching on the feeder causes the common shaft 28 to rotate and thus causes the first rollers of each of the rows of the conveyor device to rotate, the other rollers then not being driven. This differential rotation causes the bottom envelope to advance and causes the batch of envelopes to pivot so that said batch starts to be placed in the conveying direction. After a few milliseconds due to the angular delay, the second rollers come into action and continue, in their turn, to drive the bottom envelope while also continuing to pivot the stack (which is then easier due to the simultaneous action of the first and second rollers of each of the rows) so that said stack comes into the conveying direction parallel to the referencing wall and then, a few milliseconds later, the third rollers come into action. Whereupon, all of the rollers are driven synchronously until there are no more envelopes in the stack, and until the last envelope of the batch is injected into the selector device. Once the last envelope has been injected, and under drive from the return springs 34, the pusher abutments 30 separate from the drive abutments 32 in which they are in contact so as to return to their original positions in order to process a subsequent batch.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10306175 | Oct 2010 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5180154 | Malick | Jan 1993 | A |
5718313 | Sekine | Feb 1998 | A |
6102391 | Malick et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
RE37007 | Gerlier | Jan 2001 | E |
6464217 | Kulpa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6715408 | Rossi | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7264239 | Kawai | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7478808 | Bernard et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7975831 | Ponti | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8328177 | Claris | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20110060453 | Mazeiller | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299 02 106 | Jun 1999 | DE |
0 577 403 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2 067 722 | Jun 2009 | EP |
03064159 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report of EP 10 30 6175 dated Jan. 24, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120103757 A1 | May 2012 | US |