Electrophotographic printing devices, such as laser printing devices, form images on media like paper. In general, a photoconductive drum is charged over its entire surface, and then selectively discharged in accordance with the image to be formed. Charged colorant such as dry or liquid ink or toner adheres to locations on the drum that have been discharged, and the colorant is then directly or indirectly transferred from the drum to the media. The photoconductive drum is discharged and remaining colorant on the drum is removed before repeating the image-formation process.
As noted in the background section, in an electrophotographic printing device, a photoconductive drum is used to transfer colorant onto media to form images on the media. Photoconductive drums can be fabricated from a variety of different materials. Some materials have relatively short lifespans; for example, organic photoconductive foil drums may have a lifetime of about 100,000 image-forming impressions. Other materials can have much longer lifespans; for example, amorphous silicon photoconductive drums may have a lifetime greater than 1,000,000 image-forming impressions.
A drawback to using photoconductive drums having greater longevity is that their ability to form images on media without impairing image-formation quality is degraded. Specifically, dirt, debris, and other contaminants may over time stick to the drum. As the photoconductive drum ages, a sufficient amount of such contaminants stick to the drum to visibly affect image-formation quality. That is, undesired artifacts such as dark specks and marks may be visually evident on the media on which images are formed, and/or blank spots where colorant should have been deposited but has not been may become visually evident on such media.
As noted in the background section, after colorant has been transferred to media, the photoconductive drum is discharged and remaining colorant removed before the image-formation process is repeated. Removal of the colorant is achieved by rotating the drum against a sponge impregnated with a cleaning solution or fluid. The photoconductive drum is then rotated against a wiper to remove the cleaning solution from the drum before the image-formation process is repeated. Conventionally, designers of electrophotographic printing devices have sought to maximize the extent to which the cleaning solution is removed by the wiper. In actuality a small amount of cleaning solution typically remains after wiping, on the order of tens of nanometers in thickness, although this has not been seen as desirable.
The inventors have unintuitively discovered that purposefully maintaining a relatively tick layer of cleaning solution on the photoconductive drum, on the order of hundreds of nanometers in thickness, maintains the ability of photoconductive drums to form images on media without impairing image-formation quality over a longer time period. Amorphous silicon photoconductive drums and other types of photoconductive drums that have lifespans greater than 1,000,000 image-forming impressions can still form images without quality impairment even as they approach the end of their lifespans. Purposefully maintaining a relatively thick layer of cleaning solution on the photoconductive drum is to great degree illogical, insofar as the inclusion of a wiper within an electrophotographic printing device is conventionally meant to remove the solution from the drum to the greatest degree possible.
Disclosed herein are elegant techniques for purposefully maintaining a cleaning solution layer on the photoconductive drum to promote the longevity of the drum's ability to form images on media without degradation in image quality. The inventors have discovered, for instance, that purposefully rounding the edge of the wiper that comes into contact with the photoconductive drum maintains a layer of cleaning solution on the drum greater than one-hundred nanometers in thickness during wiping. By comparison, typically the wiper has at least a nominally sharp edge to maximize cleaning solution removal from the drum, such that the amount that remains after wiping is on the order of tens of nanometers in thickness.
The thickness of the cleaning solution layer maintained on photoconductive drum during wiping is generally great enough to promote longevity of the drum's ability to form images on media without image quality degradation, but not great enough to interfere with charging of the drum at the beginning of the image-formation process. That is, too thick of a layer of cleaning solution remaining on the photoconductive drum can result in an insulating layer that prevents the charger roller, corona wire, or other charging mechanism from uniformly charging the surface of the drum before being selectively discharged in correspondence with the image to be formed on the media. This is another reason why typically wipers have had nominally sharp edges to maximize removal of the cleaning solution from the photoconductive drum.
Purposefully maintaining a relatively thick cleaning solution layer on the photoconductive drum has other advantages as well. Besides promoting the longevity of the drum's ability to form images on media without image quality impairment, a relatively thick cleaning solution layer can protect the surface of the photoconductive drum itself from becoming damaged by contaminants like dirt and debris. The contaminants are less likely to become lodged into the drum's surface when a relatively thick layer of cleaning solution coats the photoconductive drum, and such contaminants are more likely to be removed the next time the drum rotates past the sponge or wiper. Furthermore, a relatively thick cleaning solution layer on the photoconductive drum can protect the drum when it is being charged; the charging process subjects the photoconductive drum to harsh conditions in which ozone can be present and in which the drum is bombarded with electrons.
An optical discharge mechanism 106, such as a laser, selectively discharges the photoconductive drum 102 in accordance with an image to be formed onto media 116, such as paper, as the drum 102 continues to rotate. In one implementation, at least one rotating dispensing roller 108 transfers colorant, such as dry or liquid ink or toner, to the photoconductive drum 102 as the drum 102 continues to rotate. The colorant is deposited onto the photoconductive drum 102 typically just where the drum 102 has been discharged, and thus in accordance with the image to be formed. The term colorant is not used herein to imply that the ink, toner, or other colorant is of a particular color, and indeed the colorant can be black.
As the photoconductive drum 102 continues to rotate with the selectively transferred colorant thereon, a rotating transfer roller 112 in one implementation transfers the colorant from the drum 102 onto the media 116 that is advancing from left to right between the transfer roller 112 and a rotating impression roller 114. In another implementation, the drum 102 transfers the colorant directly onto the media 116. The photoconductive drum 102 rotates past a cleaning assembly 120 to completely discharge its photoconductive surface and remove any colorant still thereon before repeating the described process via being charged by the charge roller 104.
The sponge 202 is impregnated with a cleaning solution or fluid, such as isoparaffinic fluid, and can be in physical contact with the photoconductive drum 102. The sponge 202 may, for instance, by in fluidic contact with a supply of the cleaning solution that replenishes the sponge 202 and keeps the sponge 202 continuously moist with the solution. As the photoconductive drum 102 rotates past the sponge 202, the physical interaction between the sponge 202 and the drum 102, and/or the physical and/or chemical interaction between the cleaning fluid and the drum 102, cleans or removes any colorant 206 remaining on the drum 102. Once the photoconductive drum 102 has rotated past the sponge 202, a thick layer 208 of the cleaning solution remains on the drum 102.
As the photoconductive drum 102 rotates past the wiper 204, an edge 212 of the wiper 204 that is closest to the drum 102, and which can be in contact with the drum 102, wipes the cleaning solution from the drum 102. However, in actuality, a layer 210 of the cleaning solution remains on the photoconductive drum 102 after the drum 102 has rotated past the wiper 204. The thickness of the layer 210 of the cleaning solution that remains on the drum 102 after rotating past the wiper 204 is less than the thickness of the layer 208 that remains before rotating past the wiper 204. However, the thickness of the cleaning solution layer 210 is still relatively thick, and is greater than the thickness of a layer of cleaning solution that would otherwise remain if maximal removal of the cleaning solution by the wiper 204 were desired.
Stated another way, the wiper 204 wipes the cleaning solution from the photoconductive drum 102 while purposefully maintaining the layer 210 of the cleaning solution on the drum 102. The cleaning solution layer 210 may have a thickness greater than 100 nanometers, and even greater than 300 nanometers, as opposed to a thickness on the order of tens of nanometers if maximal clean solution removal were desired. The cleaning solution layer 210 that is purposefully kept on the photoconductive drum 102 more generally has a thickness sufficient to promote the longevity of the drum's 102 ability to form images on media without impairing image-formation quality, and to promote the longevity of the photoconductive drum 102 itself.
For example, when the edge 212 of the wiper 204 has a radius of 1.5 millimeters, the cleaning solution layer 210 that remains on the photoconductive drum 102 after rotating past the wiper 204 in
In
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/067641 | 7/31/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/020924 | 2/9/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5097294 | Nishio et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5218412 | Martin | Jun 1993 | A |
5596398 | Woo | Jan 1997 | A |
5599393 | Elvidge | Feb 1997 | A |
5867758 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6021297 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6308034 | Nakashima | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7048969 | Ichikawa | May 2006 | B2 |
8086133 | Ziegelmuller et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20050201785 | Gila | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20120207508 | Nishiyama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237272 | Sandler | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120275836 | Kadis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130259551 | Liu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140141361 | Liu | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
88102674 | Nov 1988 | CN |
1065939 | Nov 1992 | CN |
1152731 | Jun 1997 | CN |
1279708 | Jan 2001 | CN |
101303563 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101414149 | Apr 2009 | CN |
102129195 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102648440 | Aug 2012 | CN |
103324069 | Sep 2013 | CN |
103365127 | Oct 2013 | CN |
102009026495 | Dec 2010 | DE |
H04287081 | Oct 1992 | JP |
2001154553 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002132106 | May 2002 | JP |
WO-8912260 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO-2012019755 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English machine translation of Azuma (JP H04-287081 A). |
English machine translation of Miyamori et al. (JP 2001-154553 A). |
English machine translation of Fujishima et al. (JP 2002-132106 A). |
English machine translation of Kuhn et al. (DE 102009026495 A1) (Year: 2010). |
Unknown, “Canon LBP-LX (EPL) & FX-1 Toner Cartridges”, Summiy Technologies, Sep. 28, 2007, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180321629 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |