Making a soft tissue prosthesis for repairing a defect of an abdominal wall or a pelvic cavity wall

Abstract
Surgical prostheses and methods of using and making surgical prostheses are disclosed.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to surgical prostheses, and more particularly to a surgical prosthesis used to repair an opening in a body cavity.


BACKGROUND

An unwanted opening in a body cavity, such as an incisional hernia, is often repaired using a prosthetic mesh, such as a polypropylene mesh or a polypropylene mesh including a biodegradable, adhesion barrier layer as described in PCT publication number WO 01/43789 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,264,702, to line the inner surface of the body cavity at the wall opening.


SUMMARY

In general, in one aspect, the invention features a surgical prosthesis. The surgical prosthesis includes a three-dimensional mesh including at least two types of yarn interlooped or intertwined to define at least two layers, wherein one of the at least two layers is substantially non-biodegradable and another of the at least two layers is substantially biodegradable. An adhesion barrier is interconnected with the second, substantially biodegradable layer of the three-dimensional mesh.


Embodiments may include one or more of the following features. One of the at least two types of yarn within the three-dimensional mesh is a non-biodegradable yarn. The non-biodegradable yarn is selected from polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate or a combination thereof. The non-biodegradable yarn has a diameter of about 0.001 to about 0.010 inches, and is preferably about 0.005 inches.


Embodiments may also include one or more of the following features. One of the at least two types of yarn is a biodegradable yarn. The biodegradable yarn is selected from poly(glycolic) acid, polylactic acid, polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, calcium alginate or a combination thereof. The biodegradable yarn has a diameter of no greater than about 120 denier. In certain embodiments, the biodegradable yarn has a diameter no greater than about 100 denier.


In some embodiments, the three-dimensional mesh of the surgical prosthesis includes at least one non-biodegradable monofilament yarn and at least one biodegradable multifilament yarn. In some embodiments, the three-dimensional mesh of the surgical prosthesis includes at least one non-biodegradable monofilament yarn and at least two biodegradable multifilament yarns.


Embodiments may also include one or more of the following features. The adhesion barrier of the surgical prosthesis includes polymer hydrogel. The adhesion barrier includes at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide. In some embodiments, the adhesion barrier includes a crosslinked polymer hydrogel alone or in combination with at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide. The crosslinked polymer hydrogel includes one or more hydrophilic blocks, one or more biodegradable blocks, and one or more crosslinking blocks. The crosslinked polymer hydrogel is formed by polymerization of monomers including photopolymerizable poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethlyene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters. The polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide includes carbodiimide-modified hyaluronic acid and carbodiimide-modified carboxymethylcellulose.


Embodiments may also include one or more of the following features. The adhesion barrier is in the form of a film, a foam, or a gel. The adhesion barrier has a density of about 5 grams total polymer per square foot. The surgical prosthesis has a moisture content of less than about 2%. In some embodiments, the surgical prosthesis has a moisture content less than about 1.2%.


In another aspect, the invention features a surgical prosthesis including a first layer formed substantially of a non-biodegradable yarn, a second layer formed substantially of a first biodegradable yarn, and an adhesion barrier embedded within the second layer. The first and second layers of the surgical prosthesis are connected with a second biodegradable yarn. The first layer defines a first outer surface of the surgical prosthesis and the adhesion barrier defines a second outer surface of the surgical prosthesis, wherein the first outer surface has a macroporous structure adapted to permit tissue ingrowth into the first layer and the second outer surface of the surgical prosthesis is adapted to minimize the formation of adhesion of tissue adjacent to the second outer surface.


Embodiments may include one or more of the following features. The second outer surface of the surgical prosthesis has a microporous structure having a pore size of about 10 microns or less. The macroporous structure of the first outer surface of the surgical prosthesis has a pore size of about 100 microns or more.


Embodiments may also include one or more of the following features. The non-biodegradable yarn is selected from polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate or a combination thereof. The first biodegradable yarn is selected from poly(glycolic) acid, polylactic acid, polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, calcium alginate or combinations thereof. The second biodegradable yarn is selected from poly(glycolic) acid, polylactic acid, polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, calcium alginate or combinations thereof.


Embodiments may also include one or more of the following. The adhesion barrier includes a crosslinked polymer hydrogel and at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide. The crosslinked polymer hydrogel includes one or more hydrophilic blocks, one or more biodegradable blocks, and one or more crosslinking blocks. In some embodiments, the crosslinked polymer hydrogel is formed by polymerization of monomers including photopolymerizable poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethlyene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters. The polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide includes carbodiimide-modified hyaluronic acid and carbodiimide-modified carboxymethylcellulose.


In general, in a further aspect, the invention features a method of making a surgical prosthesis. The method includes the steps of providing a fabric including a first layer formed substantially of non-biodegradable yarn and a second layer formed of biodegradable yarn, providing a liquid formulation including macromers and an initiator, placing the fabric with the liquid formulation such that the second layer is in fluid contact with the liquid formulation; and exposing the liquid formulation to a light source.


Embodiments may include one or more of the following. The light source used is an LED array having an intensity of about 1 to about 100 mW/cm2. The initiator used within the liquid formulation is a photoinitiator, such as for example, Eosin Y. The liquid formulation further includes biopolymers, an accelerant, and a buffer. The biopolymers include at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide. The buffer includes triethanolamine and/or potassium phosphate. The accelerant includes N-vinylcaprolactam. In some embodiments, the liquid formulation includes 1 weight percent carbodiimide-modified hyaluronic acid and carbodiimide-modified carboxymethylcellulose, 2.5 weight percent poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethlyene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters, 40 ppm of Eosin Y, 4000 ppm N-vinylcaprolactam, 0.54 weight percent triethanolamine, 0.8 weight percent of potassium phosphate.


In another aspect, the invention features a method of making a surgical prosthesis. The method includes providing a fabric including a first layer formed substantially of non-biodegradable yarn and a second layer formed of biodegradable yarn, providing a liquid formulation including a first polymer system, a second polymer system, and a photo initiator, placing the fabric over the liquid formulation such that the second layer is in fluid contact with the liquid formulation, and exposing the liquid formulation to a light source to activate the photoinitiator so as to cause polymerization of at least one of the polymer systems in the liquid formulation.


Embodiments may include one or more of the following. The polymerization of at least one of the polymer systems results in the formation of a barrier layer partially embedded within the second layer of the fabric. The first polymer system includes carbodiimide-modified hyaluronic acid and carbodiimide-modified carboxymethylcellulose and the second polymer system includes poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethylene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters. The photoinitiator includes Eosin Y. The liquid formulation further includes an accelerant and at least one buffer. In some embodiments, the liquid formulation includes accelerant, such as, for example, n-vinylcaprolactam, and two buffers, such as triethanolamine and potassium phosphate.


Embodiments may also include one or more of the following. The light source used to activate the photoinitiator is an LED array having an intensity of about 1 to about 100 mW/cm2. The surgical prosthesis formed is dried in a convection oven.


In general, in a further aspect, the invention features a method of repairing an opening in a wall enclosing a body cavity of a patient. The method includes providing a surgical prosthesis, such as, for example, the surgical prostheses described above, and securing the surgical prosthesis over the wall opening of the patient such that the adhesion barrier faces viscera or tissue from which adhesion is to be prevented.


Embodiments may have one or more of the following advantages. The surgical prosthesis can be used to treat an opening in a patient's body cavity with minimal or no adhesion formation. Due to the incorporation of the adhesion barrier within the mesh, there is a strong mechanical connection between the hydrophilic adhesion barrier and a hydrophobic polypropylene mesh. As a result, the likelihood of delamination of the adhesion barrier from the mesh is decreased. Another advantage of the surgical prosthesis is the inclusion of interlooping or intertwining yarns forming the two layers of the mesh. The use of the interlooping or intertwining yarns reduces or even eliminates reliance on adhesives to form the surgical prosthesis.


As used herein “non-biodegradable” means a material that contains components that are not readily degraded, absorbed, or otherwise decomposed when present in a body cavity.


As used herein “biodegradable” means a material that contains components that can be degraded and/or absorbed at some time after implantation of the surgical prosthesis, such as within weeks or months following implantation.


As used herein “substantially” means predominantly but not wholly that which is specified. When a layer is said to be substantially non-biodegradable, it refers to a layer that is predominantly composed of non-biodegradable material, but for a small volume of the layer where the non-biodegradable material intertwines with the biodegradable material. When a layer is said to be substantially biodegradable, it refers to a layer that is predominantly composed of biodegradable material, but for a small volume of the layer where the biodegradable material intertwines with the non-biodegradable material.


The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a surgical prosthesis.



FIG. 1B is a surface view of a first surface of the surgical prosthesis of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 1C is a surface view of a second surface of the surgical prosthesis of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 2A is a cross-sectional view of a mesh used to form a surgical prosthesis.



FIG. 2B is a surface view of a non-biodegradable layer of the mesh of FIG. 2A



FIG. 2C is a surface view of a biodegradable layer of the mesh of FIG. 2A.



FIG. 3A is a surface view of another embodiment of a mesh used to form a surgical prosthesis.



FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of the mesh of FIG. 3A.



FIG. 4 is a surface view of an opening in a wall of a body cavity before repair.



FIG. 5 is a surface view of the opening of FIG. 4 with the surgical prosthesis shown in FIG. 1A properly positioned for repair.



FIG. 6 is a surface view of the opening and surgical prosthesis in FIG. 5, the opening now being closed by sutures.





Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIGS. 1A-C, a surgical prosthesis 10 for repairing an unwanted opening in a body cavity, such as an opening in the abdomen, includes an adhesion barrier 20 supported by a three-dimensional mesh 30. The three-dimensional mesh 30, shown with the adhesion barrier 20 in FIGS. 1A-C and without the adhesion barrier 20 in FIGS. 2A-C, is formed of biodegradable yarn 32 and non-biodegradable yarn 34 that define at least two layers (here, two). Referring particularly to FIG. 1B, one of the at least two layers, layer 33, forms a first mesh surface 35 and is substantially non-biodegradable. Referring particularly to FIG. 1C, another of the at least two layers, layer 37, forms a second mesh surface 39 and is substantially biodegradable. Layers 33 and 37 are connected together by a biodegradable binding yarn 40. An adhesion barrier 20, which substantially prevents adhesions from forming on the surgical prosthesis, is formed directly on (e.g., polymerized on) biodegradable layer 37, thereby interconnecting adhesion barrier 20 to mesh 30.


Prior to applying adhesion barrier 20 to mesh 30 to form surgical prosthesis 10, mesh 30 has an uncompressed thickness of between about 2.5 and 3.0 millimeters, an areal density of about 13 to 16 g/ft2, and includes a macroporous structure (e.g., having a pore size of about 100 microns or more) that is accessible from first mesh surface 35 and second mesh surface 39. After applying adhesion barrier 20 to mesh 30 and air drying, surgical prosthesis 10 has a thickness between about 0.45 and 0.9 millimeters, an areal density of about 18 to 21 g/ft2, and includes a macroporous structure that is accessible only from the first mesh surface 35. That is, adhesion barrier 20 is applied to mesh 30 so that adhesion barrier 20 extends past second mesh surface 39 and into the macroporous structure of biodegradable layer 37 of mesh 30, thereby at least partially filling the macroporous structure of layer 37. In some embodiments, the macroporous structure of layer 37 is replaced with a microporous structure (e.g., having a pore size of about 50 microns or less, preferably having a pore size of 10 microns or less).


The Mesh


Mesh 30 is any woven or knitted structure that includes biodegradable yarns 32 and non-biodegradable yarns 34. Typically, the ratio of non-biodegradable yarns to biodegradable yarns in the mesh ranges from about 0.1 to 9. In certain embodiments, the ratio of non-biodegradable yarns to biodegradable yarns is 1 to 2.33. Mesh 30 has a structure that on one side allows adhesion barrier 20 to become entangled and interlocked within biodegradable layer 37, and on the opposite side has a structure that provides a strong support frame for cellular ingrowth and repair. In some embodiments, such as, for example, the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 2A-C, mesh 30 includes biodegradable and non-biodegradable yarns that have been intertwined and/or interlooped to define layers 33 and 37. In certain embodiment, such as, for example, the embodiment shown in FIGS. 3A-B, mesh 30′ includes a preformed non-biodegradable mesh 33′ formed of non-biodegradable yarns 34 and a preformed biodegradable mesh 37′ formed of biodegradable yarns 32 that are stitched together with biodegradable binding yarn 40.


In general, the non-biodegradable yarn 34 in mesh 30 can be selected as desired. Typically, non-biodegradable yarn 34 is selected to be biocompatible with the subject in whom surgical prosthesis 10 is to be used. In addition, non-biodegradable yarn 34 used in mesh 30 typically has a straight tensile strength between about 1.0 and 2.0 lbs as measured based on a method according to ASTM standard #D2256-95A. In some embodiments, the non-biodegradable yarn 34 is a monofilament yarn having a diameter of about 0.001 inches to about 0.010 inches. In certain embodiments, the non-biodegradable yarn 34 has a diameter of about 0.005 inches. Examples of non-biodegradable yarns include polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate.


Biodegradable yarns 32, 40 in mesh 30 can also be selected as desired. In general, the biodegradable yarn is selected to be compatible with adhesion barrier 20. In some embodiments, the biodegradable yarn is hydrophilic. In certain embodiments, biodegradable yarns 32 used in mesh 30 has a straight tensile strength between about 0.4 and 1.8 lbs as measured by a method based on ASTM standard #D2256-95A. In some embodiments, the biodegradable yarn is a 90 denier or less multifilament yarn. The multifilament yarn can include 10 to 50 monofilament fibers that each has a thickness of about 0.0006 inches. Examples of biodegradable yarns include poly(glycolic) acid (PGA), polylactic acid (PLA), polydioxanone (PDO), polycaprolactone (PCL), calcium alginate, and copolymers thereof.


In some embodiments, the non-biodegradable and/or biodegradable yarns can be coated with a lubricant in order to facilitate knitting of the yarns. Suitable examples of lubricants for the non-biodegradable and biodegradable yarns include nontoxic hydrophobic waxes such as, for example, esters of fatty acid alcohols, or hydrophilic lubricants such as, for example, polyalkyl glycols. One specific spin finish that yields particularly good results for the non-biodegradable yarn is Lurol PP-3772 (Goulston Technologies, Inc., Monroe, N.C.). A spin finish blend of Poloxamer 184, Polysorbate 20, sodium lauryl sulfate, propylene glycol methyl ether, and toluene has yielded good results for the biodegradable yarn.


The Adhesion Barrier


The adhesion barrier 20 composition may comprise a gel, foam, film or membrane made of a bioresorbable material. The adhesion barrier 20 may be prepared from one or more components selected from hyaluronic acids and any of its salts, carboxymethyl cellulose and any of its salts, oxidized regenerated cellulose, collagen, gelatin, phospholipids, and the first and second polymer systems described below, as well as any crosslinked or derivatized forms thereof. In some embodiments, the barrier is made from a material capable of forming a hydrogel when contacted with an aqueous fluid, such as saline, phosphate buffer, or a bodily fluid.


In a preferred embodiment, the adhesion barrier 20 composition comprises a mixture of at least two polymer systems. The first polymer system includes a crosslinked biodegradable multi-block polymer hydrogel having a three-dimensional polymer network. The second polymer system comprises at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with a carbodiimide compound.


The crosslinked polymer hydrogel of the first polymer system comprises hydrophilic blocks, biodegradable blocks, and crosslinking blocks formed during the polymerization of macromers. The macromers are large molecules that comprise at least one hydrophilic block, at least one biodegradable block and at least one polymerizable group. One or more of these blocks may be polymeric in nature. At least one of the biodegradable blocks comprises a linkage based on a carbonate or ester group, and the macromers can contain other degradable linkages or groups in addition to carbonate or ester groups. Suitable macromers to form polymer hydrogels and methods of preparing them have been described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,524 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,410,016, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


Suitable hydrophilic polymeric blocks include those which, prior to incorporation into the macromer, are water-soluble such as poly(ethylene glycol), poly(ethylene oxide), partially or fully hydrolyzed poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinylpyrrolidone), poly(ethyloxazoline), poly(ethylene oxide)-co-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymers (poloxamers and meroxapols), poloxamines, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyalkylated celluloses such as hydroxyethyl cellulose and methylhydroxypropyl cellulose, polypeptides, polynucleotides, polysaccharides or carbohydrates such as Ficoll® polysucrose, hyaluronic acid, dextran, heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, heparin, or alginate, and proteins such as gelatin, collagen, albumin, or ovalbumin. The preferred hydrophilic polymeric blocks are derived from poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(ethylene oxide).


The biodegradable blocks are preferably hydrolyzable under in vivo conditions. Biodegradable blocks can include polymers and oligomers of hydroxy acids, carbonates or other biologically degradable polymers that yield materials that are non-toxic or present as normal metabolites in the body. Preferred oligomers or polymers of hydroxy acids are poly(glycolic acid), also called polyglycolate, poly(DL-lactic acid) and poly(L-lactic acid), also called polylactate. Other useful materials include poly(amino acids), poly(anhydrides), poly(orthoesters), and poly(phosphoesters). Polylactones such as poly(epsilon-caprolactone), poly(delta-valerolactone), poly(gamma-butyrolactone) and poly(beta-hydroxybutyrate), for example, are also useful. Preferred carbonates are derived from the cyclic carbonates, which can react with hydroxy-terminated polymers without release of water. Suitable carbonates are derived from ethylene carbonate (1,3-dioxolan-2-one), propylene carbonate (4-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-one), trimethylene carbonate (1,3-dioxan-2-one) and tetramethylene carbonate (1,3-dioxepan-2-one).


Polymerizable groups are reactive functional groups that have the capacity to form additional covalent bonds resulting in macromer interlinking. Polymerizable groups specifically include groups capable of polymerizing via free radical polymerization and groups capable of polymerizing via cationic or heterolytic polymerization. Suitable groups include, but are not limited to, ethylenically or acetylenically unsaturated groups, isocyanates, epoxides (oxiranes), sulfhydryls, succinimides, maleimides, amines, imines, amides, carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids and phosphate groups. Ethylenically unsaturated groups include vinyl groups such as vinyl ethers, N-vinyl amides, allyl groups, unsaturated monocarboxylic acids or their esters or amides, unsaturated dicarboxylic acids or their esters or amides, and unsaturated tricarboxylic acids or their esters or amides. Unsaturated monocarboxylic acids include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid and crotonic acid or their esters or amides. Unsaturated dicarboxylic acids include maleic, fumaric, itaconic, mesaconic or citraconic acid or their esters or amides. Unsaturated tricarboxylic acids include aconitic acid or their esters or amides. Polymerizable groups may also be derivatives of such materials, such as acrylamide, N-isopropylacrylamide, hydroxyethylacrylate, hydroxyethylmethacrylate, and analogous vinyl and allyl compounds.


The polymerizable groups are preferably located at one or more ends of the macromer. Alternatively, the polymerizable groups can be located within the macromer. At least a portion of the macromers may contain more than one reactive group per molecule so that the resulting hydrophilic polymer can be crosslinked to form a gel. Macromers having two or more polymerizable groups per molecules are called herein crosslinkers. The minimal proportion of crosslinkers required will vary depending on the desired properties of the hydrogel to be formed and the initial macromer concentration in solution. The proportion of crosslinkers in the macromer solution can be as high as about 100% of all macromers in the solution. For example, the macromers include at least 1.02 polymerizable groups on average, and, more preferably, the macromers each include two or more polymerizable groups on average. Poloxamines, an example of water-soluble polymer component suitable to form a hydrophilic block, have four arms and thus may readily be modified to include four polymerizable groups.


Examples of preferred macromers are illustrated below:


where the polyethylene glycol repeat unit is —(CH2—CH2—O)x— or (PEG)x, trimethylene carbonate repeat unit is —(C(O)—O—(CH2)3—O)w— or (TMC)w; lactic acid residue is —(O—CH(CH3)—CO)y— or (L)y; acrylate residue is CH2═CH—CO— or A, and q, w, w′, y, y′ and x are integers.

A-(L)y-(TMC)w-[(PEG)x-(TMC)w′]q-(L)y′-A
A-(L)y-[(PEG)x-(TMC)w′]q-(L)y′-A
A-[(PEG)x-(TMC)w′]q-(L)y′-A]


Polymerization of the macromers can be initiated by photochemical means, by non-photochemical like redox (Fenton chemistry) or by thermal initiation (peroxide etc). Suitable photochemical means include exposure of the macromer solution to visible light or UV light in the presence of a photoinitiator such as UV or light sensitive compounds such as dyes, preferably eosin Y.


Polymerization of the macromers may be conducted in the presence of small amounts of monomers which act as accelerant of the polymerization reaction. Preferably the monomers represent 2% or less of the total content of the polymerizable material, more preferably 1% or less, and yet usually about 4,000 ppm. A preferred accelerant is vinyl caprolactam.


In the discussion below and the examples, macromers may be designated by a code of the form xxkZnAm, where xxk represents the molecular weight in Daltons of the backbone polymer, which is polyethylene glycol (“PEG”) unless otherwise stated, with x as a numeral and k as the multiplier for thousands; Z designates the molecular unit from which the biodegradable block is derived from and may take the value one or more of L, G, D, C, or T, where L is for lactic acid, G is for glycolic acid, D is for dioxanone, C is for caprolactone, T is for trimethylene carbonate; n is the average number of degradable groups randomly distributed on each end of the backbone polymer; A is for acrylate and m for the number of polymerizable groups per macromer molecules. Thus 20 kTLA2 as used in the Example section is a macromer with a 20×103 Da polyethylene glycol core with an average of first trimethylene carbonate residues (7 or more residues per macromers, in average about 12) and lactic acid residues (5 or less residues per macromers) sequentially extending on both ends of the glycol core and randomly distributed between both ends then terminated with 2 acrylate groups.


The second polymer system comprises at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by a carbodiimide. Methods of preparation of these modified polymers have been described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,229 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,983, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


Suitable polyanionic polysaccharides may be selected from one or more of the following, hyaluronic acid, carboxymethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl amylose, carboxymethyl chitosan, chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, heparin, heparin sulfate, alginic acid, and any of their salts, including sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, ammonium or mixtures thereof.


The polyanionic polysaccharides are modified by reaction with a carbodiimide to form N-acyl urea derivatives and render them water insoluble, however, they remain very hydrophilic and thus absorb water to form gels also referred to as hydrogels. The reaction conditions with carbodiimides are well described in the cited patents above. Preferred carbodiimides are those that exhibit water solubility, such as 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethyl-carbodiimide (EDC) or 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide methiodide (ETC).


After reaction with carbodiimide, the modified polyanionic polysaccharide compositions may be dried to less than about 20% moisture content, preferably about 9% and stored in powder form.


To prepare the barrier compositions, the modified polyanionic polysaccharide composition may be rehydrated in buffer alone to form a fluid gel before mixing with the macromer solution of the second polymer system. The barrier composition may also be prepared by rehydrating the modified polyanionic polysaccharide composition in the buffer solution of the macromer solution of the second polymer system, thereby forming a fluid gel that comprises both polymer systems. The fluid gel is then cast in a dish having the desired shape and exposed to polymerizing condition, such a UV or visible light to form a barrier composition of the invention. Once the macromers in the fluid gel have polymerized, the barrier composition forms a hydrated soft rubbery material that has improved handling properties and is resistant to tear. The barrier composition may be polymerized into desired shape articles like sheets, discs, tubes or rods by selecting appropriate casts or by extrusion.


The barrier composition may be further dried for packaging and then re-hydrated prior to implantation into the body of a patient (such as a human or animal such as non-human mammals). The barrier composition or shaped article is preferably dried to a moisture content of less than about 5%, and preferably less than about 2% in a convection oven to form a film or membrane, or freeze-dried under a vacuum to form a foam. The barrier composition may be used alone to treat or prevent complications from surgeries (e.g., to prevent the formation of adhesions).


The barrier composition may be deposited on the surface of medical devices such as fabrics (e.g., woven or non-woven fabrics, such as meshes, knits, fleeces and mattes) as a fluid and then dried by any known method. In embodiments in which the barrier composition is in the form of a film or a foam, the barrier composition can be laminated and/or stitched to the fabric by any known method. In embodiments in which the barrier composition is formed from a solution including macromers (e.g., a fluid gel), the barrier composition can be deposited on the fabric by placing the fabric in the fluid gel and initiating polymerization. Hydrophobic fabrics will float on the surface of the fluid gel. Less hydrophobic fabrics, such as fabrics having polar groups (e.g., esters, amides, ketones, and carbonates), may penetrate through the surface into the fluid gel to a certain extent such that polymerization of functional groups on the macromers in the presence of the fabric provides for greater adherence of the barrier composition to the fabric. In composite multilayered fabrics of the invention where one layer is less hydrophobic than the other, when placing the less hydrophobic side of the fabric over the fluid gel, the fibers on that side of the fabric penetrate the fluid gel, while the hydrophobic fibers on the other side of the fabric float over the fluid gel. Once the composition is polymerized, a portion of the polymer network entraps the less hydrophobic fibers of the fabric providing added adhesion strength of the barrier on the fabric.


Once applied to the device or fabric, the barrier composition may be dried for long-term storage and packaging, then rehydrated prior to implantation into the body of a patient.


In general, the adhesion barrier can be in the form of a film, foam, or gel. In some embodiments, the adhesion barrier has a density of less than about 20 grams of total polymer per square foot. In some embodiments, the adhesion barrier has a density of about 4 to about 6 grams of total polymer per square foot. In certain embodiments, the adhesion barrier has a density of about 5 grams of total polymer per square foot.


Referring to FIGS. 4-6, surgical prosthesis 10 can be used to repair an opening 100 in a wall 110 of a patient's body cavity 120 that exposes a visceral surface 122 (e.g., bowels, omentum). To repair opening 100, a medical professional inserts surgical prosthesis 10 through opening 100 and into body cavity 120. Surgical prosthesis 10 is positioned such that layer 37 faces the visceral surface 122 and layer 33 faces wall 110 and covers opening 100. Once the surgical prosthesis 10 is positioned, the medical professional closes opening 100 with sutures 130.


In time, adhesion barrier 20 (e.g., about 3 to 28 days) and layer 37 (e.g., about 60 to 90 days) of mesh 30 are absorbed by the body, leaving layer 33 in contact with visceral surface 122. However, by the time the adhesion barrier 20 has been absorbed, opening 100 has healed to an extent (e.g., a new peritoneal surface has formed over opening 100) that the likelihood of adhesions forming between viscera and surgical prosthesis 10 is minimal. In addition, layer 37, which is formed from biodegradable yarn 32, provides a second defense against adhesion prevention. As described above, layer 37 is absorbed by the body over a period of about 60 to 90 days. As a result, any adhesions that may have formed due to a failure of adhesion barrier 20 or after adhesion barrier 20 was absorbed will be released as layer 37 is absorbed.


While both adhesion barrier 20 and layer 37 are absorbed by a patient's body, layer 33 of the surgical prosthesis 10 becomes incorporated into wall 110. Layer 33, made substantially from non-biodegradable yarn 34, provides a strong, macroporous structure that allows for tissue ingrowth (e.g., layer 33 has a pore size of 100 microns or greater) to repair opening 100.


In general, surgical prosthesis 10 can be prepared using any desired method. In certain embodiments, surgical prosthesis 10 is prepared as follows. First, the three-dimensional mesh 30 is created using biodegradable yarn 32 and non-biodegradable yarn 34. The yarns 32, 34 are threaded into an industrial knitting machine, such as a double-needle bar knitting machine. Yarns 32 and 34 are knitted together using any knitting pattern that creates a three-dimensional macroporous structure having biodegradable layer (e.g., layer 37) and non-biodegradable layer (e.g., layer 33). In certain embodiments, mesh 30 is formed by knitting together a non-biodegradable yarn, a first biodegradable yarn, and a second biodegradable yarn, wherein the non-biodegradable yarn and the first biodegradable yarn form layers 33 and 37 respectively and the second biodegradable yarn binds layers 33 and 37 together. To apply adhesion barrier 20 to mesh 30, a liquid formulation including a photoinitiator and adhesion barrier precursor components is added to a glass tray. Then mesh 30 is placed within the tray with the bioabsorbable side (layer 37) facing the bottom of the tray (e.g., the bioabsorbable layer in fluid contact with the liquid formulation). The liquid formulation is photopolymerized by exposing the tray to a light source that activates the photoinitiator (e.g., a light source having a wavelength of about 450 nm to about 550 nm and an intensity of about 1 mW/cm2 to about 100 mW/cm2). As a result of photoinitiation, a hydrogel is formed within the tray around at least a portion of layer 37. The hydrogel is then dried so that the resulting mesh/hydrogel has a moisture content of less than about 2% (e.g., less than about 1.2%, such as about 0.8%). The mesh/dried hydrogel is then sterilized to form surgical prosthesis 10.


It is believed that the hydrogel does not form within the porous structure of layer 33 during photopolymerization for at least three reasons. First, the amount of liquid formulation added to the glass tray is controlled to produce a hydrogel having a thickness that is equal to or less than the thickness of layer 37. For example, approximately one milliliter of solution including photoinitiator and adhesion barrier precursor components is added per square inch of tray. Then, a mesh having an areal density of 14.5 g/ft2 with a biodegradable layer having an uncompressed thickness of about 2.5 millimeters is added to the tray. Second, because there is an incompatibility between non-biodegradable yarn 34 (e.g., hydrophobic) and the hydrophilic precursor components, the liquid formulation tends not to wick up into the pore structure of layer 33. As result, when the liquid formulation is polymerized it forms the hydrogel only around layer 37. Third, when the polymerized hydrogel, which is mostly water, is air-dried it decreases greatly in thickness. As a result, the adhesion barrier is only around layer 37.


The following examples are illustrative and not intended to be limiting.


Example 1

To manufacture the three-dimensional mesh, two 5 mil polypropylene monofilament fibers (Shakespeare Monofilament and Specialty Polymers, Columbia, S.C.), a 45 denier polyglycolic acid multifilament fiber (Teleflex Medical, Coventry, Conn.), and a 90 denier polyglycolic acid multifilament fiber (Teleflex Medical, Coventry, Conn.) were threaded into a double needle bar knitting machine (Karl Mayer Textimaschinenfabrik GmbH, Oberlshausen, Germany). Referring to FIGS. 2A-C, the fibers were co-knitted by Secant Medical, Perkasie, Pa. using the bar pattern given below to create a mesh that had a layer formed substantially of poly(glycolic) acid on the front (FIG. 2C), a layer formed substantially of polypropylene on the back (FIG. 2B), and a polyglycolic acid binder fiber connecting the two layers together (FIG. 2A).









TABLE 1







Mesh Bar Pattern









Bar
Fiber
Pattern





1
 5 mil polypropylene monofilament fiber fully
1/0, 1/2, 2/3, 2/1



threaded


2
 5 mil polypropylene monofilament fiber fully
2/3, 2/1, 1/0, 1/2



threaded


3
45 denier polyglycolic multifilament fiber half
1/0, 1/2



set threaded


4
90 denier polyglycolic multifilament fiber half
1/0, 2/3



set threaded









After fabrication, the three-dimensional mesh was cleaned in a scouring system and annealed at 150° C. in a heat setting frame to stabilize the three-dimensional mesh structure. The resulting three-dimensional mesh had on average 18 wales per inch, 28 courses per inch, a thickness of 0.0319 inches, an areal density of 4.60 ounce per square yard, a burst strength of 762±77 Newtons as measured by a method based on ASTM standard #D3787-89, a tear propagation strength in a direction parallel to the machine direction of 127±21 Newtons and perpendicular to the machine direction of 203±15 Newtons as measured by a method based on ASTM standard #D5587-96, a suture retention strength in the direction parallel to the machine direction of 60±12 Newtons and perpendicular to the machine direction of 80±9 as measured by the pullout force of a 20 gauge needle placed five millimeters from the mesh edge.


Example 2

A liquid formulation including the precursors for adhesion barrier 20 was made as follows. First 1 gram of modified and irradiated hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) powder prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,017,229 and 5,527,893, was mixed with 86 grams of deionized water under high shear to form a suspension. Next, 2.5 grams of a photopolymerizable compound powder based on poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethlyene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters (20 kTLA2) and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,177,095, was blended into the suspension. Then, 40 ppm, of Eosin Y, a photoinitiator, 4000 ppm of N-vinylcaprolactam, an accelerant, 0.54 grams of triethanolamine, a buffer and electron transfer component, and 0.8 grams of potassium phosphate, a second buffer, were blended into the suspension. To complete the liquid formulation, additional deionized water was added to bring the final volume to 100 grams.


Example 3

The mesh as described in Example 1 was combined with the adhesion barrier as described in Example 2 to form a surgical prosthesis for soft tissue repair with one surface for tissue ingrowth and one surface with anti-adhesion properties.


To join the adhesion barrier to the mesh, the liquid formulation described in Example 2 was cast onto a glass plate at a casting density of 5 grams of total polymer per square foot. The mesh was placed into the liquid formulation with the polyglycolic acid layer facing the glass plate. The area was illuminated with a visible light from an LED array (450-550 nm) at an intensity of about 4 mW/cm2 for 120 seconds. The photopolymerized composite was dried in a convection oven at 50° C. for 4 hours. The dried composite was peeled from the glass plate, cut to various sizes, packaged, and ethylene oxide sterilized.


Example 4

The surgical prosthesis as prepared in Example 3 was evaluated in a rabbit hernia repair model with abraded bowel.


Twenty sexually mature female New Zealand White Rabbits each weighing between 3 kg and 5 kg at the time of surgery, were anesthetized and subjected to a 5 cm by 7 cm full thickness abdominal muscle excision and cecal abrasion surgical procedure. Each rabbit received either a 5 cm by 7 cm piece of a polypropylene mesh or the surgical prosthesis as prepared in Example 3. All rabbits were allowed to recover from the surgical procedure.


Twenty-eight days after the surgery, the rabbits were euthanized and overall performance of the materials, including adhesion formation and tissue ingrowth was evaluated. Adhesion formation was evaluated and visually scored for extent coverage by adhesion. The following scale was used during the visual examination: 0=no adhesions, 1=25% or less of the defect covered by adhesions, 2=26% to 50% of the defect covered by adhesion, 3=51% to 75% of the defect covered by adhesions, 4=more than 75% of the defect covered by adhesions.


In addition to visual examinations, image analysis was used to calculate the total surface area of the defects and the surface area covered by adhesions. Mechanical testing and SEM samples were also collected and analyzed. The results are described in Tables 2 and 3 below.









TABLE 2







Rabbit Hernia Repair with Abraded Bowel Adhesion Reduction Efficacy


Results













% Defect
% Animals
% with No


Group
Mean Extent
with
with No
Dense Bowel


N = 10
of Adhesions
Adhesions
Adhesions
Adhesions





Polypropylene
2.9 ± 0.3
47.3 ± 6.3 
0
0


Mesh


Surgical
 1.3 ± 0.2*
14.3 ± 5.0*
0
 60**


Prosthesis as


Prepared in


Example 3





*p < 0.05 Tukey Kramer HSD analysis


**p < 0.05 Chi-Square analysis













TABLE 3







Rabbit Hernia Repair with Abraded Bowl Tissue Incorporation Results










Group
Max Load (N) ± SEM







Polypropylene Mesh
33.7 ± 1.2



Surgical Prosthesis as
29.7 ± 1.3



Prepared in Example 3







{circumflex over ( )}p < 0.05 Tukey-Kramer HSD analysis






The results in Table 2 indicate that the surgical prosthesis as described in Example 3 performed significantly well in preventing dense bowel adhesions in vivo. In addition, the surgical prosthesis described in Example 3 had excellent tissue incorporation strength as shown in Table 3.


Example 5

A surgical prosthesis was prepared by placing the bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid side of the mesh as described in Example 1 into 10 to 12 ml of a liquid formulation in a polystyrene dish having an area of 56.7 square centimeters. For the liquid formulation, 2 grams of carbodiimide-modified HA/CMC powder in 90 grams of water was blended with 5% 20 kTLA2 macromer in 100 grams of deionized water. Additional solution consisting of 40 ppm Eosin Y, 4000 ppm N-vinylcaprolactam, 1.08 grams of triethanolamine, and 1.6 grams of potassium phosphate in deionized water were added to bring the final volume to 200 grams.


The liquid formulation was then photopolymerized into a hydrogel using an LED array (450-550 nm) at an intensity of about 4 mW/cm2 for 45 seconds. The mesh with hydrogel was freeze-dried at approximately −30° C. and 200 mTorr, before being peeled from the polystyrene dish. The resulting surgical prosthesis was compressed at 5,000 lbs force for 10 seconds between Teflon coated plates and double packaged in vapor permeable pouches. The surgical prosthesis were sterilized by exposure to ethylene oxide before use.


Using the processes described in Example 4, a 5 cm by 7 cm piece of either a polypropylene mesh or the surgical prosthesis described in this example was implanted in a rabbit hernia repair model with abraded bowel in 10 rabbits for 14 days and in 10 different rabbits for 28 dates. The results are shown in Table 4 below.









TABLE 4







Rabbit Hernia Repair with Abraded Bowel Adhesion Reduction Efficacy


Results












Mean
% Defect
% Animals
% with No



Extent of
with
with
Dense Bowel



Adhesions
Adhesions
No Adhesions
Adhesions















Group: 14 Days






Polyproylene
3.0 ± 0.6 
65 ± 11
0
0


Mesh


Surgical
1.0 ± 0.3*
16 ± 8*
20
40


Prosthesis as


Prepared in


Example 5


Group: 28 Days


Polypropylene
2.4 ± 0.3 
42 ± 13
0
0


Mesh


Surgical
1.0 ± 0.1*
12 ± 3*
10
20


Prosthesis as


Prepared in


Example 5





*p < 0.05 Tukey Kramer HSD analysis






The adhesion reduction efficacy results showed that the surgical prosthesis described in this example performed well in preventing adhesions in vivo.


Example 6

A liquid formulation of 2.5% 20 kTLA2, 40 ppm of Eosin Y, 4000 ppm of N-vinylcaprolactam, 0.54% of triethanolamine, 0.8% of potassium phosphate, and 1% carbodiimide-modified HA/CMC was prepared and 32 ml of the liquid formulation was cast on a 32 square inch glass plate. The mesh from Example 1 was placed into the liquid formulation with the biodegradable polyglycolic acid side down. The liquid formulation was photopolymerized by exposing the liquid formulation to a visible light emitting diode array having an intensity of about 4 mW/cm2 for four minutes. The resulting mesh reinforced with hydrogel was allowed to air dry at 50° C. for four hours, before the glass plate was removed. The reinforced mesh was then dehydrated at 100° C. for seven hours to form the surgical prosthesis.


Example 7

The surgical prosthesis of Example 6 was tested for surgical handling properties. The abdomino-pelvic cavity of an adult domestic pig was used to simulate a laparoscopic clinical application of the surgical prosthesis.


The surgeon who inserted the surgical prosthesis into the abdomino-pelvic cavity of the adult domestic pig was able to differentiate the correct sidedness of a wet and a dry surgical prosthesis. Before insertion, the surgeon attached stay sutures at each end of the surgical prosthesis. The surgeon then hydrated the surgical prosthesis in saline for a few seconds before delivering the prosthesis through a 12 millimeter trocar. A portion of the stay sutures were passed through the abdominal wall and secured. The surgical prosthesis was tacked to the sidewall using helical titanium tacks. Moderate manipulation of the surgical prosthesis during placement did not cause any delamination. Overall, the surgeon was pleased with the handling, placement, and durability of the surgical prosthesis.


Example 8

A mesh for a surgical prosthesis was formed by stitching together a polyglycolic acid (PGA) nonwoven felt fabric with a mass/area of about 7 mg/cm2 and a thickness of about 1 millimeter to a single atlas polypropylene mesh with a mass area of 9.4 mg/cm2 and made from 6 mil polypropylene fiber. The PGA nonwoven felt fabric was obtained from Scaffix International (Dover, Mass.) and the single atlas polypropylene mesh was obtained from Genzyme Biosurgery (Fall River, Mass.).


The nonwoven felt fabric was stitched to the polypropylene mesh using Bondek® polyglycolic acid suture size 6-0 (provided by Genzyme Biosurgery, Coventry, Conn. now Teleflex Medical, Coventry, Conn.) in a standard sewing machine. The mass/area of the mesh as stitched together was 16 to 17 mg/cm2.


To form a surgical prosthesis, the mesh was placed with the PGA nonwoven felt side down into 10 ml of a 2.5% liquid formulation of 20 kTLA2, 40 ppm of Eosin Y, 4000 ppm of N-vinylcaprolactam, 0.54% of triethanolamine, and 0.8% of potassium phosphate in a polystyrene dish having an area of 56.7 cm2. The liquid formulation was photopolymerized into a hydrogel with five 40 second cycles from a xenon light source. The mesh with the hydrogel was freeze-dried at −30° C. and 200 mTorr. A well incorporated, flexible dry sample resulted. The surgical prosthesis was sterilized by exposure to ethylene oxide. After initial hydration, the surgical prosthesis had good wet handling durability.


Example 9

A mesh for a surgical prosthesis was formed using the process described in Example 8. The nonwoven felt fabric side was placed down into a 56.7 cm2 polystyrene dish having 12 grams of a suspension including 2.3% carbodiimide-modified HA/CMC as obtained from Genzyme Corporation (Framingham, Mass.) and 0.073 ml of glycerol, a plasticizer. The dish including the suspension and the mesh was left to air-dry overnight.


A high quality composite sample resulted with all components firmly attached and a mass/area ratio of 21.7 mg/cm2. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the plasticized HA/CMC membrane was observed to be embedded in the fibers of the nonwoven felt fabric side of the mesh. Some voids, possibly due to air bubbles, were noticeable within the adhesion barrier.


The sample was heated for 7 hours at 100° C. in a convection oven to remove residual moisture. Upon hydration, the hydrophilic, lubricous layer of HA/CMC was visually noticeable on the one surface of the surgical prosthesis. The surgical prosthesis had good wet handling properties after initial hydration and after 24 hours soaking in water at room temperature. The hydrated sample could be rubbed vigorously between thumb and forefingers without delamination and could not be peeled apart by hand.


Example 10

A mesh for a surgical prosthesis was formed using the process described in Example 8. The nonwoven felt fabric side was placed down into a 56.7 cm2 polystyrene dish having 5 ml of a 5% solution of 20 kTLA2, 40 ppm of Eosin Y, 4000 ppm of N-vinylcaprolactam, 0.54% of triethanolamine, 0.8% of potassium phosphate, and 5% hyaluronic acid. The solution was then photopolymerized into a hydrogel with four 40 second cycles from a xenon light source obtained from Genzyme Biosurgery (Lexington, Mass.).


The surgical prosthesis had very good wet handling durability and could be used as is or freeze-dried for use at a later time.


Example 11

A mesh for a surgical prosthesis was formed by stitching together a Vicryl® knitted mesh formed of polyglactin 910, a copolymer of poly glycolic and polylactic acid fibers and obtained from Ethicon (New Brunswick, N.J.) to a single atlas polypropylene mesh with a mass area of 9.4 mg/cm2 and made from 6 mil polypropylene fiber and obtained from Genzyme Biosurgery (Fall River, Mass.).


The Vicryl® knitted mesh was stitched to the polypropylene mesh using Bondek® polyglycolic acid suture size 6-0 (provided by Genzyme Biosurgery, Coventry, Conn. now Teleflex Medical, Coventry, Conn.) in a standard sewing machine. The mass/area of the mesh as stitched together was about 15 mg/cm2.


To form the surgical prosthesis, the mesh was placed with the Vicryl® surface down into 5 ml of a 5% solution of 20 kTLA2, 40 ppm of Eosin Y, 4000 ppm of N-vinylacprolactam, 0.54% of triethanolamine, and 0.8% of potassium in a polystyrene dish having an area of 56.7 cm3. The solution was then photopolymerized into a hydrogel with four 40 second cycles from a xenon light source. The surgical prosthesis was freeze-dried at −30° C. and 200 mTorr. A well-incorporated, flexible, dry surgical prosthesis resulted. After initial hydration, the surgical prosthesis had good wet handling durability.


All publications, applications, and patents referred to in this application are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in their entirety.


All of the features disclosed herein may be combined in any combination. Each feature disclosed may be replaced by an alternative feature serving the same, equivalent, or similar purpose. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is only an example of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.


Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making a surgical prosthesis, the method comprising the steps of: providing a fabric comprising a first layer formed substantially of non-biodegradable yarn and a second layer formed of biodegradable yarn;providing a liquid formulation comprising macromers and an initiator;placing the fabric within the liquid formulation such that the second layer is in fluid contact with the liquid formulation; andexposing the liquid formulation to a light source.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the initiator is a photoinitiator.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the photoinitiator comprises Eosin Y.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid formulation further comprises biopolymers, an accelerant and a buffer.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the biopolymers comprise at least one polyanionic polysaccharide modified by reaction with carbodiimide.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the buffer comprises triethanolamine.
  • 7. The method of claim 4, wherein the buffer comprises potassium phosphate.
  • 8. The method of claim 4, wherein the accelerant comprises N-vinylcaprolactam.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid formulation comprises 1 weight percent of carbodiimide-modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, 2.5 weight percent poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethlyene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters, 40 ppm of Eosin Y, 4000 ppm N-vinylcaprolactam, 0.54 weight percent triethanolamine, 0.8 weight percent of potassium phosphate.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the light source is an LED array having an intensity of about 1 to about 100 mW/cm2.
  • 11. A method of making a surgical prosthesis, the method comprising the steps of: providing a fabric comprising a first layer formed substantially of non-biodegradable yarn and a second layer formed of biodegradable yarn;providing a liquid formulation comprising a first polymer system, a second polymer system, and a photoinitiator;placing the fabric over the liquid formulation such that the second layer is in fluid contact with the liquid formulation; andexposing the liquid formulation to a light source to activate the photoinitiator so as to cause polymerization of at least one of the polymer systems in the liquid formulation.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the polymerization of at least one of the polymer systems results in the formation of a barrier layer partially embedded within the second layer of the fabric.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the first polymer system comprises carbodiimide-modified hyaluronic acid and carbodiimide-modified carboxymethylcellulose and the second polymer system comprises poly(ethylene glycol)-trimethylene carbonate/lactate multi-block polymers endcapped with acrylate esters.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the photoinitiator comprises Eosin Y.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the liquid formulation further comprises an accelerant and at least one buffer.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the liquid formulation further comprises a first buffer and a second buffer.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the accelerant comprises N-vinylcaprolactam, the first buffer comprises triethanolamine, and the second buffer comprises potassium phosphate.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein the light source is an LED array having an intensity of about 1 to about 100 mW/cm2.
  • 19. The method of claim 12, further comprising drying the fabric and the barrier layer in a connection oven.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/103,967, filed on Apr. 12, 2005, which application claims priority to U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/563,836, filed on Apr. 20, 2004, the entire contents of both are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (366)
Number Name Date Kind
4006747 Kronenthal et al. Feb 1977 A
4014434 Thyen Mar 1977 A
4034850 Mandel et al. Jul 1977 A
4052988 Doddi et al. Oct 1977 A
4069151 Higley et al. Jan 1978 A
4137921 Okuzumi et al. Feb 1979 A
4140678 Shalaby et al. Feb 1979 A
4141087 Shalaby et al. Feb 1979 A
4194041 Gore et al. Mar 1980 A
4199649 Yundt Apr 1980 A
4205399 Shalaby et al. Jun 1980 A
4206024 Carpenter et al. Jun 1980 A
4365634 Bare et al. Dec 1982 A
4388926 Shalaby et al. Jun 1983 A
4393584 Bare et al. Jul 1983 A
4441496 Shalaby et al. Apr 1984 A
4491218 Aday Jan 1985 A
4511035 Alpern Apr 1985 A
4511706 Shalaby et al. Apr 1985 A
4519501 Cerwin May 1985 A
4520821 Schmidt et al. Jun 1985 A
4522211 Bare et al. Jun 1985 A
4533041 Aday et al. Aug 1985 A
4543952 Shalaby et al. Oct 1985 A
4550730 Shalaby et al. Nov 1985 A
4561858 Allen, Jr. et al. Dec 1985 A
4578063 Inman et al. Mar 1986 A
4604097 Graves, Jr. et al. Aug 1986 A
4608428 Shalaby et al. Aug 1986 A
4612230 Liland et al. Sep 1986 A
4615435 Alpern et al. Oct 1986 A
4642111 Sakamoto et al. Feb 1987 A
4650817 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 1987 A
4652264 Dumican Mar 1987 A
4659572 Murray Apr 1987 A
4670286 Nyilas et al. Jun 1987 A
4680220 Johnson Jul 1987 A
4692369 Nomi Sep 1987 A
4747897 Johnson May 1988 A
4767619 Murray Aug 1988 A
4769038 Bendavid et al. Sep 1988 A
4772509 Komada et al. Sep 1988 A
4796603 Dahlke et al. Jan 1989 A
4823805 Wojcik Apr 1989 A
4871365 Dumican Oct 1989 A
4895566 Lee Jan 1990 A
4905694 Will Mar 1990 A
4925732 Driskill et al. May 1990 A
4937270 Hamilton et al. Jun 1990 A
4946736 Sassa Aug 1990 A
4990158 Kaplan et al. Feb 1991 A
4997440 Dumican Mar 1991 A
4999235 Lunn et al. Mar 1991 A
5017229 Burns et al. May 1991 A
5026591 Henn et al. Jun 1991 A
5026607 Kiezulas Jun 1991 A
5034801 Fischer Jul 1991 A
5077352 Elton Dec 1991 A
5092884 Devereux et al. Mar 1992 A
5108474 Riedy et al. Apr 1992 A
5130024 Fujimoto et al. Jul 1992 A
5141522 Landi Aug 1992 A
5147332 Moorehead Sep 1992 A
5160790 Elton Nov 1992 A
5179174 Elton Jan 1993 A
5188890 Ohashi et al. Feb 1993 A
5207812 Tronto et al. May 1993 A
5209969 Crowther May 1993 A
5217797 Knox et al. Jun 1993 A
5234106 Transue et al. Aug 1993 A
5256764 Tang et al. Oct 1993 A
5258010 Green et al. Nov 1993 A
5263629 Trumbull et al. Nov 1993 A
5264540 Cooper et al. Nov 1993 A
5269810 Hull et al. Dec 1993 A
5272012 Opolski Dec 1993 A
5274074 Tang et al. Dec 1993 A
5279539 Bohan et al. Jan 1994 A
5281475 Hollenbaugh, Jr. et al. Jan 1994 A
5284138 Kujawski Feb 1994 A
5284240 Alpern et al. Feb 1994 A
5284244 O'Toole et al. Feb 1994 A
5288552 Hollenbaugh, Jr. et al. Feb 1994 A
5290585 Elton Mar 1994 A
5292328 Hain et al. Mar 1994 A
5292333 Johnson Mar 1994 A
5311884 Scopelianos May 1994 A
5320624 Kaplan et al. Jun 1994 A
5321113 Cooper et al. Jun 1994 A
5325987 Alpern et al. Jul 1994 A
5326355 Landi Jul 1994 A
5330489 Green et al. Jul 1994 A
5339833 Berthiaume et al. Aug 1994 A
5352511 Abayasekara et al. Oct 1994 A
5354587 Abayasekara Oct 1994 A
5356006 Alpern et al. Oct 1994 A
5356432 Rutkow et al. Oct 1994 A
5356883 Kuo et al. Oct 1994 A
5358475 Mares et al. Oct 1994 A
5364699 Hollenbaugh, Jr. et al. Nov 1994 A
5366504 Andersen et al. Nov 1994 A
5379472 Aihomaki Jan 1995 A
5383925 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5392978 Velez et al. Feb 1995 A
5393594 Koyfman et al. Feb 1995 A
5395383 Adams et al. Mar 1995 A
5397332 Kammerer et al. Mar 1995 A
5410016 Hubbell et al. Apr 1995 A
5412068 Tang et al. May 1995 A
5413598 Moreland May 1995 A
5424136 Hermes Jun 1995 A
5429869 McGregor et al. Jul 1995 A
5433996 Kranzler et al. Jul 1995 A
5437900 Kuzowski Aug 1995 A
5445739 Fujimoto et al. Aug 1995 A
5454820 Kammerer et al. Oct 1995 A
5462781 Zukowski Oct 1995 A
5464929 Bezwada et al. Nov 1995 A
5478372 Stark Dec 1995 A
5478423 Sassa et al. Dec 1995 A
5486593 Tang et al. Jan 1996 A
5494620 Liu et al. Feb 1996 A
5498467 Meola Mar 1996 A
5500038 Dauber et al. Mar 1996 A
5516881 Lee et al. May 1996 A
5522879 Scopelianos Jun 1996 A
5527893 Burns et al. Jun 1996 A
5529830 Dutta et al. Jun 1996 A
5531998 Mares et al. Jul 1996 A
5541076 Houghton et al. Jul 1996 A
5542594 McKean et al. Aug 1996 A
5547551 Bahar et al. Aug 1996 A
5565154 McGregor et al. Oct 1996 A
5567435 Hubbell et al. Oct 1996 A
5569273 Titone et al. Oct 1996 A
5571126 Dorsey, III Nov 1996 A
5571605 Abrams et al. Nov 1996 A
5584875 Duhamel et al. Dec 1996 A
5591526 Abrams et al. Jan 1997 A
5593441 Lichtenstein et al. Jan 1997 A
5595751 Bezwada et al. Jan 1997 A
5597579 Bezwada et al. Jan 1997 A
5599614 Bahar et al. Feb 1997 A
5607687 Bezwada et al. Mar 1997 A
5614284 Kranzler et al. Mar 1997 A
5618552 Bezwada et al. Apr 1997 A
5620669 Plinke et al. Apr 1997 A
5620698 Bezwada et al. Apr 1997 A
5626611 Liu et al. May 1997 A
5626811 Liu May 1997 A
5631011 Wadstrom May 1997 A
5632745 Schwartz May 1997 A
5632979 Goldberg et al. May 1997 A
5633343 Bezwada et al. May 1997 A
5635041 Bahar et al. Jun 1997 A
5635124 Abrams et al. Jun 1997 A
5639851 Bezwada et al. Jun 1997 A
5641501 Cooper et al. Jun 1997 A
5644002 Cooper et al. Jul 1997 A
5645850 Bezwada et al. Jul 1997 A
5648088 Bezwada et al. Jul 1997 A
5652055 King et al. Jul 1997 A
5658894 Weisz Aug 1997 A
5660918 Dutta Aug 1997 A
5688900 Cooper et al. Nov 1997 A
5690739 Sassa et al. Nov 1997 A
5695525 Mulhauser et al. Dec 1997 A
5696178 Cooper et al. Dec 1997 A
5698213 Jamiolkowski et al. Dec 1997 A
5700583 Jamiolkowski et al. Dec 1997 A
5703200 Bezwada et al. Dec 1997 A
5705177 Roufa et al. Jan 1998 A
5705181 Cooper et al. Jan 1998 A
5709748 Sassa et al. Jan 1998 A
5709954 Lyden et al. Jan 1998 A
5714389 Charlton et al. Feb 1998 A
5714551 Bezwada et al. Feb 1998 A
5716408 Eldridge et al. Feb 1998 A
5733325 Robinson et al. Mar 1998 A
5736589 Cooper et al. Apr 1998 A
5749968 Melanson et al. May 1998 A
5759154 Hoyns Jun 1998 A
5766246 Mulhauser et al. Jun 1998 A
5766979 Budnaitis Jun 1998 A
5769862 Kammerer et al. Jun 1998 A
5769899 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5776611 Elton et al. Jul 1998 A
5786057 Lyden et al. Jul 1998 A
5788770 Hobson et al. Aug 1998 A
5795584 Totakura et al. Aug 1998 A
5800908 Hobson et al. Sep 1998 A
5804011 Dutta et al. Sep 1998 A
5815125 Kelly et al. Sep 1998 A
5820552 Crosby et al. Oct 1998 A
5820841 Chen et al. Oct 1998 A
5824047 Moreland Oct 1998 A
5830565 Budnaitis Nov 1998 A
5837001 Mackey Nov 1998 A
5843268 Lyden et al. Dec 1998 A
5843390 Plinke et al. Dec 1998 A
5843743 Hubbell et al. Dec 1998 A
5844016 Sawhney et al. Dec 1998 A
5844017 Jamiolkowski et al. Dec 1998 A
5847327 Fischer et al. Dec 1998 A
5854383 Erneta et al. Dec 1998 A
5859150 Jamiolkowski et al. Jan 1999 A
5868788 Bezwada et al. Feb 1999 A
5874419 Herrmann et al. Feb 1999 A
5874537 Kelman et al. Feb 1999 A
5885738 Hannon Mar 1999 A
5886535 Budnaitis Mar 1999 A
5891193 Robinson et al. Apr 1999 A
5896038 Budnaitis et al. Apr 1999 A
5902799 Herrmann et al. May 1999 A
5902956 Spies et al. May 1999 A
5906872 Lyden et al. May 1999 A
5908427 McKean et al. Jun 1999 A
5908428 Scirica et al. Jun 1999 A
5909123 Budnaitis Jun 1999 A
5916671 Dauber et al. Jun 1999 A
5928414 Wnenchak et al. Jul 1999 A
5931835 Mackey Aug 1999 A
5935161 Robinson et al. Aug 1999 A
5935940 Weisz Aug 1999 A
5951997 Bezwada et al. Sep 1999 A
5962023 Jamiolkowski et al. Oct 1999 A
5964774 McKean et al. Oct 1999 A
5966022 Budnaitis et al. Oct 1999 A
5966593 Budnaitis et al. Oct 1999 A
5976127 Lax Nov 1999 A
5986043 Hubbell et al. Nov 1999 A
5997568 Liu Dec 1999 A
6004326 Castro et al. Dec 1999 A
6004347 McNamara et al. Dec 1999 A
6026814 LaFontaine et al. Feb 2000 A
6029806 Cerwin et al. Feb 2000 A
6031148 Hayes et al. Feb 2000 A
6039755 Edwin et al. Mar 2000 A
6041211 Hobson et al. Mar 2000 A
6045560 McKean et al. Apr 2000 A
6045571 Hill et al. Apr 2000 A
6046060 Budnaitis Apr 2000 A
6054230 Kato Apr 2000 A
6063112 Sgro May 2000 A
6063115 Gealow May 2000 A
6066294 Lin et al. May 2000 A
6066777 Benchetrit May 2000 A
6074660 Jamiolkowski et al. Jun 2000 A
6077297 Robinson et al. Jun 2000 A
6083524 Sawhney et al. Jul 2000 A
6086526 Francischelli Jul 2000 A
6100346 Jamiolkowski et al. Aug 2000 A
6110243 Wnenchak et al. Aug 2000 A
6113624 Bezwada et al. Sep 2000 A
6117095 Daggett et al. Sep 2000 A
6117528 Hobson et al. Sep 2000 A
6120539 Eldridge et al. Sep 2000 A
6130175 Rusch et al. Oct 2000 A
6138278 Taylor et al. Oct 2000 A
6143675 McCollam et al. Nov 2000 A
6147168 Jamiolkowski et al. Nov 2000 A
6150581 Jiang et al. Nov 2000 A
6152141 Stevens et al. Nov 2000 A
6162962 Hinsch et al. Dec 2000 A
6165217 Hayes Dec 2000 A
6171330 Benchetrit Jan 2001 B1
6177095 Sawhney et al. Jan 2001 B1
6214020 Mulhauser et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214039 Banas et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214331 Vanderhoff et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216496 Gehring Apr 2001 B1
6221099 Andersen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224622 Kotzev May 2001 B1
6224828 Lin et al. May 2001 B1
6224894 Jamiolkowski et al. May 2001 B1
6233905 Singh May 2001 B1
6235659 McAmish et al. May 2001 B1
6238467 Azarian et al. May 2001 B1
6241763 Drasler et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245030 DuBois et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245098 Feeser et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251135 Stinson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251435 Jamiolkowski et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253769 LaFontaine et al. Jul 2001 B1
6254978 Bahar et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258017 Singh Jul 2001 B1
6258124 Darois et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264684 Banas et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264702 Ory et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267772 Mulhauser et al. Jul 2001 B1
RE37307 Bahar et al. Aug 2001 E
6270530 Eldridge et al. Aug 2001 B1
6270902 Tedeschi et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283905 Singh Sep 2001 B1
6287316 Agarwal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287499 Roby et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294202 Burns et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294356 Jones et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296691 Gidumal Oct 2001 B1
6306164 Kujawski Oct 2001 B1
6306424 Vyakarnam et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309423 Hayes Oct 2001 B2
6313411 Budnaitis Nov 2001 B1
6319264 Tormala et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324435 Shchervinsky et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329488 Terry et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331351 Waters et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332884 Cooper Dec 2001 B1
6333029 Vyakarnam et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344371 Fischer et al. Feb 2002 B2
6350244 Fisher Feb 2002 B1
6350283 Michelson Feb 2002 B1
6352710 Sawhney et al. Mar 2002 B2
6355699 Vakarnam et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361551 Torgerson et al. Mar 2002 B1
RE37656 Bahar et al. Apr 2002 E
6372256 Jamiolkowski et al. Apr 2002 B2
RE37701 Bahar et al. May 2002 E
6385946 Singh May 2002 B1
6387363 Gruskin May 2002 B1
6391060 Ory et al. May 2002 B1
6395017 Dwyer et al. May 2002 B1
6403655 Bezwada et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406423 Seetbon Jun 2002 B1
6408656 Ory et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410044 Chudzik et al. Jun 2002 B1
6423252 Chun et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425547 Singh Jul 2002 B1
6425924 Rousseau Jul 2002 B1
6440427 Wadstrom Aug 2002 B1
6443964 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447551 Goldmann Sep 2002 B1
6451032 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451059 Janas et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458385 Jamiolkowski et al. Oct 2002 B2
6458554 Hui et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461311 DuBois et al. Oct 2002 B2
6478727 Seetbon Nov 2002 B2
6482444 Bellantone et al. Nov 2002 B1
6497650 Nicolo Dec 2002 B1
6500777 Wiseman et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503257 Grant et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506197 Rollero et al. Jan 2003 B1
6524345 Valimaa et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528015 Lin et al. Mar 2003 B1
6531147 Sawhney et al. Mar 2003 B2
6534084 Vyakarnam et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544503 Vanderhoff et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546603 Wang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6547801 Dargent et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548081 Sadozai et al. Apr 2003 B2
6551555 Antonoplos et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562068 Drasler et al. May 2003 B2
6565580 Beretta May 2003 B1
6565842 Sojomihardjo et al. May 2003 B1
6575168 LaFontaine et al. Jun 2003 B2
6592515 Thierfelder et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592625 Cauthen Jul 2003 B2
6602290 Esnouf et al. Aug 2003 B2
6638284 Rousseau et al. Oct 2003 B1
6737371 Planck et al. May 2004 B1
20020018813 Burns et al. Feb 2002 A1
20030078602 Rousseau Apr 2003 A1
20030100955 Greenawalt May 2003 A1
20030225355 Butler Dec 2003 A1
20050181023 Young et al. Aug 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
2365543 Jun 2002 CA
1099421 May 2001 EP
4250167 Sep 1992 JP
WO9406373 Mar 1994 WO
WO9812243 Mar 1998 WO
WO0016822 Mar 2000 WO
WO0143789 Jun 2001 WO
WO03041613 May 2003 WO
WO03084410 Oct 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Wantz, “Incisional Hernioplasty with Mersilene,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 172 (Feb. 1991).
Greenawalt et al, “Evaluation of Sepramesh Biosurgical Composite in a Rabbit Hernia Repair Model,” Journal of Surgical Research, Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, vol. 94, pp. 92-98 (Dec. 2000).
Notice of Reasons of Rejection of JP 2007-509511 mailed May 10, 2011.
Office Action from corresponding Canadian Patent Appn. No. 2563347 dated Nov. 18, 2011.
Office Action from corresponding European Patent Appn. No. 05732926.0 dated Nov. 15, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130045327 A1 Feb 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60563836 Apr 2004 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11103967 Apr 2005 US
Child 13658385 US