Malathion carboxylesterase

Abstract

The present invention provides an isolated DNA molecule encoding Malathion Carboxylesterase capable of hydrolysing at least one organophosphate selected from the group consisting of carboxylester organophosphates and dimethyloxon organophosphates. The DNA molecule comprises a nucleotide sequence having at least 60%, preferably at least 80% and more preferably at least 95% homology with LcαE7, in which the protein encoded by the DNA molecule differs from E3 at least in the substitution of Trip at position 251 with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of Leu, Ser, Ala, Ile, Val, Thr, Cys, Met and Gly. The preferred substituents are Leu and Ser.

Description

This invention relates to an enzyme (and the nucleic acid sequences encoding this enzyme), termed malathion carboxylesterase (MCE) which is able to efficiently hydrolyse a specific class of organophosphate (OP) insecticides which have the general structures:

(eg. malathion, phenthoate)

(eg. malaoxon, phenthoate oxon)

where X contains one or more carboxylester groups for thion type organophosphates but is unconstrained for oxon type organophosphates.

Residues of organophosphate insecticides are undesirable contaminants of the environment and a range of commodities. Areas of particular sensitivity include contamination of domestic water supplies and soil, residues above permissible levels in various food and fibre exports and contamination of domestic pets. Bioremediation strategies are therefore required for eliminating or reducing these insecticide residues. One proposed strategy involves the use of enzymes capable of immobilising or degrading the insecticide residues. Such enzymes may be employed, for example, in bioreactors through which contaminated water could be passed; in production animal dips to reduce problems with contaminated pasture and run off into water supplies; or in washing solutions after post harvest disinfestation of fruit, vegetables or animal products to reduce residue levels and withholding times. Suitable enzymes for degrading pesticide residues include esterases. It is desirable that the esterases be relatively specific and hydrolyse the pesticide residues at a rapid rate.

The MCE enzyme has been purified from different malathion resistant strains of L. cuprina , RM and der-L (Whyard S., Russell R. J. and Walker V. K., Biochemical Genetics 32: 9, 1994; Whyard S. and Walker V. K., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 50: 198, 1994). It is a 60.5 kDa monomer with a K m for malathion of 11.0±0.4 μM and a V max of 775±28 nmol malathion/min/mg. It also has a high turnover rate for malathion (k cat =46 min −1 ).

In order to enable the production of useful amounts of the MCE enzyme the present inventors sought to clone the putative MCE gene from a malathion resistant strain of L. cuprina (RM- 8 ) using PCR and cloning techniques.

The MCE gene in L. cuprina has been mapped using classical genetic techniques to a position within 0.7 map units from the E 3 gene on chromosome 4 . The likely homologue of MCE in Drosophila melanogaster , Mce, has been mapped to the right arm of chromosome 3 in the vicinity of the genes encoding the major α-carboxylesterase, EST 9, and the orthologue of L. cuprina E 3 , EST23 (Spackman M. E., Oakeshott J. G., Smyth K-A., Medveczky K. M., and Russell R. J., Biochemical Genetics, 32: 39, 1994).

In order to clone the MCE gene from L. cuprina , it was decided to use the wealth of molecular genetic techniques available for D. melanogaster to clone the MCE homologue and use these clones as probes to isolate the L. cuprina genes themselves.

In summary, five esterase amplicons were isolated from L. cuprina genomic and cDNA. Four of the five L. cuprina amplicons obtained by PCR using cluster specific primers were designated LcαE 7 , LcαE 8 , LcαE 9 and LcαE 10 on the basis of homology to the corresponding Drosophila genes. The fifth, Lc# 53 , could not be assigned with any confidence on the basis of similarity to any of the Drosophila genes.

MCE specific activity is highest in the adult head, rather than the thorax or abdomen (Smyth,K-M., Walker,V. K., Russell,R. J. and Oakeshott,J. G. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 54:48, 1996). On this basis, LcαE 7 , LcαE 8 and LcαE 10 were all MCE candidates. Previous physiological studies of Parker,A. P., Russell,R. J., Delves,A. C. and Oakeshott,J. G.(Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 41:305, 1991) have shown that the E 3 (LcαE 7 ) enzyme is present in the adult head. Moreover, the LcαE 8 and LcαE 0 genes are also expressed in the head since PCR using cluster-specific primers were able to amplify these genes from a head cDNA library. PCR failed to detect LcαE 9 and Lc# 53 in either larval fat body or adult head cDNA and Northern analysis of the D. melanogaster αE9 homologue indicated that this gene was only expressed in embryos. Therefore both LcαE 9 and Lc# 53 were discounted as candidates for the genes encoding E 3 and MCE.

The LcαE 8 and LcαE 10 genes were initially chosen as prime MCE candidates on the basis of this distribution and due to the fact that it was known that LcαE 7 encodes the E 3 enzyme involved in diazinon/parathion OP resistance in L. cuprina (PCI/AU 95/00016: “Enzyme based bioremediation”) and it was thought that malathion resistance and diazinon/parathion resistance were encode by separate genes.

The present inventors have made the surprising finding that it is a variant of LcαE 7 which encodes the MCE enzyme. This gene has been expressed in vitro and the product shown to have MCE activity. The expressed product can be formulated for use in degrading environmental carboxylester or dimethyl general OPs.

Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention consists in an isolated DNA molecule encoding an enzyme capable of hydrolysing at least one organophosphate selected from the group consisting of carboxylester organophosphates and dimethyl-oxon organophosphates, the DNA molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence having at least 60%, preferably at least 80% and more preferably at least 95% homology with LcαE 7 , in which the protein encoded by the DNA molecule differs from E 3 at least in the substitution of Trp at position 251 with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of Leu, Ser, Ala, Ile, Val, Thr, Cys, Met and Gly.

In a preferred embodiment the present invention the isolated DNA molecule has a sequence as shown in FIG. 1 or a sequence which hybridises thereto with the proviso that the protein encoded by the DNA molecule differs from E 3 at least in the substitution of Trp at position 251 with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of Leu, Ser, Ala, Ile, Val, Thr, Cys, Met and Gly.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the Trp at position 251 is substituted with Ieu or Ser.

As is stated above the present invention includes nucleic acid molecules which hybridise to the sequence shown in FIG. 1 . Preferably such hybridisation occurs at, or between, low and high stringency conditions. In general terms, low stringency conditions can be defined as 3xSCC at about ambient temperature to 65° C., and high stringency conditions as 0.1xSSC at about 65° C. SSC is the abbreviation of a buffer of 0.15M NaCl, 0.015M trisodium citrate. 3xSSC is three times as strong as SSC and so on.

In a second aspect the present invention consists in an isolated DNA molecule, the DNA molecule encoding a polypeptide having the amino acid sequence of RM- 8 Con shown in FIG. 1 or the amino acid sequence of MdαE 7 shown in FIG. 3 in which Trp at position 251 is replaced with Ser.

Homologues of the MCE encoding sequence may also be present in the genome of other insects, and particularly other species of Diptera. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention also extends to these homologues An example of this is provided by the results set out hereunder regarding Musca MCE.

The isolated DNA molecules of the present invention may be cloned into a suitable expression vector and subsequently transfected into a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell for expression of the enzyme. A particularly suitable system involves baculovirus vectors and an insect cell line.

In a third aspect the present invention consists in a method of producing an enzyme capable of hydrolysing at least one organophosphate selected from the group consisting of carboxylester organophosphates and dimethyl-oxon organophosphates, or an enzymatically active portion thereof, the method comprising transforming a host cell with the DNA molecule of the first aspect of the present invention operatively linked to a control sequence, culturing the transformed cell under conditions which allow expression of the DNA sequence and recovering the produced enzyme, or enzymatically active portion thereof.

It is also envisaged that as an alternative to using the enzyme per se as a bioremediation agent the bioremediation agent may be an organism transformed with the DNA encoding the enzyme. In such an arrangement the organism, transformed such that it expresses the enzyme, would be used as the bioremediation agent.

The invention further relates to methods for eliminating or reducing the concentration of carboxylester or dimethyl-oxon-type organophosphate insecticides residues in a contaminated sample or substance, involving the use of an esterase encoded by an isolated DNA molecule according to the present invention.

In order that the nature of the present invention may be more clearly understood preferred forms will now be described with reference to the following examples and Figures in which:

FIGS. 1A to 1 H show multiple nucleotide alignment of the three malathion-resistant clones (RM 8 A-C) and their consensus (RM 8 con) with the reference susceptible clone (Lc 743 ) of LcαE 7 (E 3 ). Dots indicate identity with the Lc 743 susceptible clone. Below the ruler is the aligned nucleotide sequence and above is the inferred amino acid sequence of Lc 743 with the one replacement found in Lc 7 RM 8 con indicated in bold text immediately below. Nucleotides are numbered from the predicted start of translation and amino acids from the predicted start methionine. Lc 743 5 ′ and Lc 743 3 ′ primer sequences are underlined.

FIGS. 2A and 2B show amino acid alignment of the inferred MdαE 7 protein from the Rutgers strain of Musca domestica compared to the LcαE 7 (E 3 ) protein from the Lucilia cuprina Lc 743 clone (PCT/AU95/00016 “Enzyme Based Bioremediation”). Sequence comparison shows a 75% identity and 86% similarity between the same length, 570 residue proteins. Arrow indicates the conserved tryptophan residue at position 251 of the alignment.

FIGS. 3A to 3 E show the 1710 bp nucleotide coding sequence of the Rutgers strain MdαE 7 gene. Also shown is the inferred 570 protein sequence.

FIG. 4 shows amino acid alignment of the PCR Ankara strain MdαE 7 amplicon and the corresponding region of the RM- 8 malathion resistant LcαE 7 protein. The structural mutations conferring malathion resistance (serine for MdaE 7 and Leucine for LcaE 7 ) are indicated by arrow at residue position 251 .

CLONING AND SEQUENCING OF THE MCE GENE FROM A MALATHION RESISTANT STRAIN OF LUCILIA CUPRINA

Two types of change in carboxylesterase activity have been associated with resistance to OP insecticides in the higher Diptera. One type of change results in resistance to OPs like diazinon and parathion, while the other results in resistance to OPs like malathion, with one or more carboxylester groups in addition to the phosphotriester moiety that defines it as an OP (see above).

The two types of change were first described among OP resistant strains of Musca domestica . In both types an increased degradation of OPs was associated with reduced ali-esterase activity, where “ali-esterase” refers to enzymes which are major contributors to the hydrolysis of the carboxylester, methyl butyrate, or similar molecules (Oppenoorth, F. J., Entomology Experimental and Applied, 2: 304, 1959; Oppenoorth F. J. and van Asperen, K., Entomology Experimental and Applied 4: 311, 1961). This led to the formulation of the “mutant ali-esterase hypothesis”, which proposes that each type of resistance is due to a mutation in a specific carboxylesterase that simultaneously enables it to hydrolyse the phosphoester linkages common to the oxon form of all OPs and decreases its activity toward certain carboxylester substrates (Oppenoorth, F. J. and van Asperen, K., Science 132: 298, 1960).

Both types of change yielded resistance factors for diverse OPs (except malathion) in the range of about 2-30 fold (Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied, 10: 263, 1967). However, the malathion resistant M. domestica strains also showed exceptionally high resistance to malathion (generally >100 fold). This high resistance was associated with cleavage of the carboxylester linkages in malathion (ie MCE activity) in addition to the hydrolysis of the phosphoester linkage (OP hydrolase activity). MCE activity accounted for the major breakdown products in vivo and in vitro (Townsend, M. G. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 12: 243, 1969).

No recombination between the two types of resistance or between them and ali-esterase activity was observed among the M. domestics strains (Nguy, V. D. and Busvine, J. R., World Health Organisation 22: 531, 1960). This suggests that while they are clearly distinct in respect of OP hydrolase and MCE activities, the two types of resistance might nevertheless be allelic changes to the same carboxylesteraselali-esterase gene/enzyme system (Oppenoorth, F. J. and Welling,W., in Insecticide Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Wilkinson, C. F. ed., Plenum Press, New York and London, pp. 507-551, 1976).

A malathion resistance phenotype has also been described in the blowfly, Chrysomya putoria , which parallels the malathion resistance phenotype of M. domestica in that it is associated with high MCE and low ali-esterase activities (Busvine, J. R., Bell, J. D. and Guneidy, A. M., Bulletin of Entomological Research 54: 589, 1963; Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 10: 263, 1967; Townsend, M. G. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 12: 243, 1969). Further evidence for the similarity of the malathion resistance phenotypes in the two species is indicated by the spectrum of OP compounds which synergise malathion. Specifically, among a series of symmetrical trisubstituted phosphorus compounds, the best synergists (eg triphenylphosphate) were common to both species (Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 10: 263, 1967). However, little is known of diazinon/parathion type resistance in C. putoria.

The mutant ali-esterase hypothesis has also been invoked to explain diazinon/parathion resistance in L. cuprina , because these flies hydrolyse paraoxon more rapidly than susceptible flies (Hughes, P. B. and Devonshire, A. L., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 18:289, 1982) and resistance is associated with reduced carboxylesterase activity. In this case the esterase isozyme E 3 from resistant flies is not detected (“non-staining”) after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE; Hughes, P. B. and Raftos, D. A., Bulletin of Entomological Research 75: 535, 1985). Evidence for a causal connection between the E 3 change and resistance was obtained by EMS mutagenesis of an E 3 staining, OP susceptible strain of L. cuprina and selection for OP resistant mutants; all resistant mutants recovered had the E 3 non-staining PAGE phenotype (McKenzie, J. A., Parker, A. G. and Yen, J. L., Genetics 130: 613, 1992).

Like malathion resistant strains of M. domestica , strains of L. cuprina that are resistant to malathion exhibit very high resistance factors towards malathion and enhanced MCE activity. Also in common with M. domestica , malathion resistant L. cuprina generally do not exhibit diazinon/parathion resistance, and vice versa. However, one difference from the situation in M. domestica is that the loci encoding the two resistance phenotypes appeared in some experiments to be genetically separable, albeit closely linked (Smyth, K-A., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G., Biochemical Genetics 32: 437,1994; Smyth, K-A., Walker, V. K., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 54: 48, 1996).

An esterase gene cluster containing genes involved in OP resistance has been isolated from L. cuprina (Newcomb, R. D., East, P. D., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G., Insect Molecular Biology 5: 211, 1996). One of these genes, LcαE 7 , encodes esterase E 3 (Newcomb, R. D., Campbell, P. M., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, in press), a structural mutation in the active site of which confers diazinon/parathion resistance on L. cuprina . These data are described in a previous patent application PCT/AU 95100016: “Enzyme based bioremediation”, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Below we describe the cloning and sequencing of the LcαE 7 gene from a malathion resistant strain of L. cuprina . We present molecular genetic evidence that this allele of esterase E 3 is the MCE gene responsible for malathion resistance in L. cuprina.

a) Cloning the Malathion Resistant Allele of LcαE 7

An RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase—PCR) approach was used to clone a cDNA allele of LcαE 7 from a malathion resistant strain of L. cuprina (RM- 8 ) which is homozygous for the fourth chromosome.

Adults from the RM- 8 strain were aged for three days before collection and stored at −70° C. RNA was prepared using a modified protocol of Chigwin et al. (Chigwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J. & Rutter, W. J., 1979, Biochemistry 18, 5294). About 100 adults were thoroughly homogenised in 15ml of solution D (4M guanidinium thiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0, 0.5% sarkosyl, 0.1M β-mercaptoethanol) using a Sorvall Omnimix blender. The resulting homogenate was filtered through glasswool and 6 ml layered on top of 5 ml of 4.8M CsCl, made up in 10 mM Na- EDTA, pH 8, in an SW41 ultracentrifuge tube. These were spun at 35,000 rpm in an SW41 rotor for 16 hr at 15° C. The supernatant was removed and the RNA pellet resuspended in 400 μl of DEPC-treated H 2 O. The RNA was precipitated by the addition of 800 μl of ethanol and 10 μl of 4M NaCl and stored under ethanol at −20° C. Before use the RNA pellet was washed in 75% ethanol and air dried before resuspension in DEPC-treated H 2 O.

PolyA + RNA was prepared from 500 μg of total RNA using affinity chromatography on oligo-dT cellulose (Pharmacia; Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA). The resulting mRNA (1-5 μg) was again precipitated, washed and resuspended in 20 μl of DEPC-treated H 2 O. Oligo-dT primed cDNA was made from 1 μg of mRNA using reverse transcriptase (Superscript II, BRL) as per the manufacturers instructions in a 20 μl volume reaction. 200 ng of cDNA was used as template in each of two PCR reactions using primers designed from the 5′ (Lc 743 5′:5′ atgaatttcaacgttagtttgatggea 3′) and complementary 3′ (Lc 743 3′:5′ ctaaaataaatctctatgtttttcaaac 3′) ends of the coding region of the LcαE 7 gene. Reactions used Taq DNA polymerase (BRL) and contained 100 pmoles of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCI, 0.002% Tween 20 (v/v), 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , and 200 ng of template. Two drops of mineral oil were layered over each 50 μl reaction. Six units of Taq enzyme was added after a 5 minute “hot start” at 97° C. and was followed by 40 cycles of 35 seconds at 97° C., 1 minute at 60° C. and 2 minutes at 72° C. A final cycle of 72° C. for 8 minutes was included. The 1.7 kb major product was gel purified and cloned into the EcoRV cleavage site of the pBSK − (Stratagene) or pGEM-T (Promega) plasmid vectors using conventional cloning techniques (Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA).

b) Sequencing the Malathion Resistant Allele of LcαE 7

Methods:

Three clones were chosen for sequencing (RM 8 -A to -C ), all of which were derived from independent PCR reactions. A set of twelve 21-mer sequencing primers (sequence shown below) were designed from the listing LcαE 7 sequence:

TABLE 1
		5′ position in Lc743 sequence
primer seq (5′ - 3′)	primer name	(FIG. 1)
ggatggtgtgcgtgattgttg	7F1	246 (SEQ ID NO:16)
aaaaggatgtggtgttgatta	7F2	464 (SEQ ID NO:17)
actaatgtcgggtaatgctat	7F3	723 (SEQ ID NO:18)
cactatgatgggtaacacttc	7F4	1026 (SEQ ID NO:19)
tgttacaggagaaacaccaac	7F5	1203 (SEQ ID NO:20)
agaatcgcgtgaatacaaaac	7F6	1467 (SEQ ID NO:21)
acggtataccctcaaaactgt	7R1	187 (SEQ ID NO:22)
tcccaaacgatattgtatgtt	7R2	504 (SEQ ID NO:23)
acatcatgtagtgggtagaag	7R3	685 (SEQ ID NO:24)
ccgaggatgtttgggtaagac	7R4	990 (SEQ ID NO:25)
tatcagctgttggtgtttctc	7R5	1231 (SEQ ID NO:26)
acgcgattctttaggcatacg	7R6	1476 (SEQ ID NO:27)

These were used in dye-terminator sequencing reactions (ABI) conducted following manufacturers instructions in 25 μl capillary tubes in a Corbett Research capillary thermal cycler, except that 50pmoles of primer was used per reaction, a “hot start” of 96° C. for 3 minutes was included and 30 cycles were completed for each sequencing reaction. Dye primer reactions were also conducted on all clones using the ABI M13 forward and reverse primers as per ABI protocols. Sequencing reactions were resolved by electrophoresis on an ABI 370A automatic sequencing machine as per the manufacturer's instructions. This resulted in both strands being sequenced entirely.

Results:

FIGS. 1A to 1 H show a nucleotide and amino acid alignment of the three resistant clones (RM 8 A-C) compared with the reference susceptible clone (Lc 743 ) of LcαE 7 . A consensus sequence of the malathion-resistant LcαE 7 allele was determined (RM- 8 con). Differences between resistant clones were assumed to be errors incorporated by the Taq polymerase.

Comparison of the susceptible sequence (Lc 743 ) with that of the malathion-resistant RM- 8 consensus sequence (RM- 8 con) identified only one replacement site difference, a Trp to Leu substitution at amino acid position 251 (nucleotide position 752 ). The homologous amino acid was highlighted on a three-dimensional model of T. californica AChE, revealing that the Leu mutation was situated at the base of the active site gorge, 6.5 Angstroms from the active site Ser.

c) Sequencing the Region Surrounding Nucleotide 752 from Various LcαE 7 Alleles

An esterase structural mutation conferring malathion resistance would be expected to occur in the active site region of the molecule. The Trp to leu mutation at nucleotide position 752 in LcαE 7 is therefore an excellent candidate for the malathion resistance mutation.

The inventors have established a total of 14 strains of L. cuprina which are homozygous for chromosome IV and of known malathion resistance status. These lines fall into seven classes on the basis of an RFLP analysis of genomic DNA using the LcαE 7 gene as a probe. Nucleotide position 752 was therefore sampled over the entire range of classes.

Methods:

The complete cDNA sequence of the LcαE 7 alleles from strains representing several of the classes are available. For example, the sequence of LcαE 7 from RM- 8 is shown in FIGS. 1A to 1 H. Moreover, the LcαE 7 cDNA sequences from strains LS 2 and Llandillo 103 , which represent two more classes, are described in patent application PCT/AU 95/00016 (“Enzyme based bioremediation”). The complete LcαE 7 cDNA sequence of the Gunning 107 strain, representing a fourth class, is described in J. Trott, B.Agr.Sc Thesis, 1995.

To obtain the sequence of LcαE 7 in the region of nucleotide 752 in strains LBB 101 , Landillo 104 and Hampton Hill 6 . 2 , representing the remaining three classes, a PCR approach was taken. Genomic DNA was prepared from either eggs using the method of Davis, L. G., Dibner, M. D., and Batley, J. F., (1986 . Basis Methods in Molecular Biology , Elsevier Science Publ. Co., New York, Section 5.3), or from adult flies using a C-TAB method (Crozier, Y. C., Koulianos, S. & Crozier, R. H., 1991, Experientia 47, 9668-969). 1 μg samples were then used as templates in PCR reactions using 100 pmoles of the primers 7 F 1 and 7 R 4 . Also included in the reactions were 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCI 2 . Two drops of mineral oil were layered over each 50 μl reaction. 2.5 units of Taq polymerase was added after a ‘hot start’ of 97° C. for 3 minutes while an annealing temperature of 55° was maintained. An initial extension at 72° C. was held for 2 minutes. This was followed by 34 rounds of 97° C. for 35 seconds, 55° C. for 1 minute and 72° C. for 1 minute. A final extension of 72° C. for 9 minutes was included. A single product of about 1 kb was produced. This was purified for sequencing using QIAquick spin columns (Qiagen), following manufacturers instructions. 500 ng of template was used in dye-terminator sequencing reactions using the 7 F 7 (5′:5′tgctgcctctacccactacat 3′) (SEQ ID NO: 28) and 7 R 7 (3′:5′ cctgtggcttggctttcataa 3′ SEQ ID NO: 29) primers as described above.

Results:

Of the seven classes assayed, all five malathion-susceptible strains (LS 2 , LBB 101 , Llandillo 104 , Gunning 107 and Llandillo 103 ) possess a G at nucleotide position 752 , whereas both malathion-resistant strains (Hampton Hill 6 . 2 and RM- 8 ) possess a T at this position, resulting in a Trp to Leu substitution at amino acid position 251 (Table 2). The presence of the same structural mutation in two malathion resistant strains with different fourth chromosomes strongly suggests that the mutation is responsible for resistance.

TABLE 2
	Malathion		Residue at amino
Strain	resistance status	Class	acid position 251 a
LS2	Susceptible	A	Trp
LBB101	Susceptible	C	Trp
Llandillo 104	Susceptible	B	Trp
RM-8	Resistant	E	Leu
Hampton Hill 6.2	Resistant	F	Leu
Llandillo 103	Susceptible	D	Trp
Gunning 107	Susceptible	G	Trp
a Amino acid at position 251 corresponds to nucleotide position 752 in FIG. 1.

d) Cloning and Sequencing the Orthologous αE 7 Gene from a Malathion Resistant Strain of Musca domestica

As described above, the diazinon/parathion and malathion esterase-mediated OP resistance types exhibit many striking parallels between L. cuprina, M. domestica and C. putoria , and are probably caused by functionally equivalent mutations in orthologous genes. The orthologous gene was therefore cloned from the housefly, M. domestica , and the region surrounding nucleotide 752 examined for the presence of the malathion resistance mutation in a malathion resistant Musca strain.

PCR Reactions;

Consensus generic a-esterase primers were designed to the conserved regions of the multiple amino acid alignments of D. melanogaster (Robin, C. Russell, R. J., Medveczky, K. M. and Oakeshott, R. J., Journal of Molecular Evolution 43: 241, 1996) and L. cuprina (Newcomb, R. D., Campbell, P. M., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, in press) α-esterase genes, and used in a PCR amplification experiment for the recovery of homologous αE 7 gene sequence from M. domestica.

Genomic DNA was prepared using the Lifton method (Bender, W., Spierer, P. and Hogness, D. S., Journal of Molecular Biology 168: 17, 1989) from adult females of the Rutgers OP resistant housefly strain (Plapp, F. W. Jr., Tate, L. G. and Hodgson, E. 1976. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 6:175-182). Rutgers strain genomic DNA was used as the template in a 50 μl amplification reaction:

TABLE 3
Final concentration/amount
Template DNA   100 ng
primer Md1     50 pmoles
primer Md2     50 pmoles
Buffer         10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl                                                                        2                                                                    ,
               50 mM KCl
dNTP's         0.25 mM (dATP, dCTP, dTTP, dGTP)
Taq polymerase 1 unit
Total volume   50 μl
Primers:
Md1 (35 mer)
5′ TTCGAGGGIATICCITAYGCIMARCCICCIBTNGG 3′ (SEQ ID NO:30)
corresponding to residues 58-69 in                                                                                     L. cuprina                                                                                 αE7
Md2 (32 mer)
5′ ACYTGRTCYTTIARICCIGCRTTICCIGGNAC 3′ (SEQ ID NO:31)
corresponding to residues 92-82 in                                                                                     L. cuprina                                                                                 αE7
Note: IUB codes used for mixed positions; I = inosine.

TABLE 3
Final concentration/amount
Template DNA   100 ng
primer Md1     50 pmoles
primer Md2     50 pmoles
Buffer         10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl                                                                        2                                                                    ,
               50 mM KCl
dNTP's         0.25 mM (dATP, dCTP, dTTP, dGTP)
Taq polymerase 1 unit
Total volume   50 μl
Primers:
Md1 (35 mer)
5′ TTCGAGGGIATICCITAYGCIMARCCICCIBTNGG 3′ (SEQ ID NO:30)
corresponding to residues 58-69 in                                                                                     L. cuprina                                                                                 αE7
Md2 (32 mer)
5′ ACYTGRTCYTTIARICCIGCRTTICCIGGNAC 3′ (SEQ ID NO:31)
corresponding to residues 92-82 in                                                                                     L. cuprina                                                                                 αE7
Note: IUB codes used for mixed positions; I = inosine.

Cloning and Sequencing PCR Amplicons:

The 540 bp major product was eluted from an agarose gel, purified using QIAGEN QIAquick PCR purification kit and cloned into the pGEM-T plasmid vector (PROMEGA) using standard techniques (Sambrook, J., Fritsch. E. F. and Maniatis, T., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA, 1989). The ends of the cloned insert were sequenced using commercially available T7 and SP6 primers and TaqFS dye-terminator technology (ABI) on the Applied Biosystems Model 370A automated DNA sequencer. Translated amino acid sequences were aligned to predicted α-esterase protein sequences using PILEUP from the GCG computer package (Devereux, J., The GCG sequence analysis software package Version 6.0. Genetics Computer Group, University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center, 1710 University Avenue, Madison, Wis., USA, 1989); all proved to be homologous to the sequences of known α-esterase genes from D. melanogaster and L. cuprina . The cloned 534 bp amplicon showed 76% identity over the equivalent 135 amino acids of the L. cuprina αE 7 predicted protein sequence.

Isolation of the Complete αE 7 Gene from M. Domestica:

A λDASH (Stratagene) genomic library of the Rutgers strain of M. domestica (Koener, J. F., Carino, F. A. and Feyereisen, R., Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 23:439, 1993) was screened for a full-length genomic clone of αE 7 . Approximately 300,000 plaques were probed with the 32 P labelled 534 bp amplicon described above. Library screening using conventional techniques (Sambrook, J., Fritsch. E. F. and Maniatis, T., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA, 1989) was performed at high stringency (50% formamide, 5X SSC, 3X Denhardt's, 0.5% SDS and 10 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA at 45° C.) and included a final high stringency wash (0.1% SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C.). Restriction mapping indicated that a single λDASH clone with a 17.5 kb genomic insert contained the αE 7 gene. A 4.5 kb HindIII fragment was subcloned into the pBSK vector (Stratagene) and characterised using dye-terminator automatic sequencing technology, as described above. A set a thirteen sequencing primers were designed and used to interpret the full length genomic sequence:

TABLE 4
			5′ position in
primer			MdαE7 coding
name	5′ - 3′ primer sequence	size	sequence (FIG. 3)
T7	end sequencing of 4.5 kb pBSK − clone		polycloning site
T3	end sequencing of 4.5 kb pBSK − clone		polycloning site
AE7.1	TTTGGTCCCGACTACTTTATGA	22 mer	442 (SEQ ID NO:32)
AE7.2	TGCCACTTATGAAATCTGTCTGTA	24 mer	310 (SEQ ID NO:33)
AE7.3	TACATGATGATAACCGAACAGACC	24 mer	676 (SEQ ID NO:34)
AE7.4	TCGATTATTTGGGTTTCATTTGT	23 mer	107 (SEQ ID NO:35)
AE7.5	ACAGACAGATTTCATAAGTGG	21 mer	288 (SEQ ID NO:36)
AE7.6	TTTGCATTCTTTCGGGTGTCA	21 mer	913 (SEQ ID NO:37)
AE7.7	ATTCGATACCCACATTGATAG	21 mer	1016 (SEQ ID NO:38)
AE7.8	GGCACTCCCATTTATTTGTAT	21 mer	1312 (SEQ ID NO:39)
AE7.10	ATGACTTTTCTGAAGCAATTCAT	23 mer	1 (SEQ ID NO:40)
AE7.11	AAACAATTCCTTCTTTTTATCGA	23 mer	1710 (SEQ ID NO:41)
AE7.12	GGCATGGAAAACCTCACCTGG	21 mer	1558 (SEQ ID NO:42)

The predicted coding sequence of 1710 bp or 570 amino acids showed a very high 75% identity and 85% similarity to the equivalent full length 570 residues of the αE 7 protein from L. cuprina (FIGS. 2 and 3 ). Southern hybridisation analysis as per standard methods (Sambrook, J., Fritsch. E. F. and Maniatis, T., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA, 1989) of a probe and EcoRI, Hind III, Sal I digested DNA, showed a single 4.5 kb hybridising band for the HindIII digest, a single 6.0 kb SailI band and two EcoRI bands of 1.5 kb and 0.8 kb. The analysis confirms the restriction pattern interpreted from the sequencing and mapping data of the lambda genomic clone. No other aberrant hybridisation patterns occurred indicating a high probability that αE 7 exists as a single copy gene.

Characterisation of a Putative αE 7 Malathion Resistant Allele of M. domestic:

Genomic DNA extracted (Bender, W., Spierer, P. and Hogness, D. S., Journal of Molecular Biology 168: 17, 1989) from single adult female flies of the highly malathion resistant Ankara strain (Sisli, M. N., Bosgelmez, A., Kocak, O., and Porsuk, H. 1983. Mikrobiyol Bul. 17:49-46) was used for sequence characterisation of a putative malathion resistance allele. A series of PCR reactions were performed using single fly genomic DNA for the characterisation of allelic variants of the αE 7 gene. PCR amplification using conditions described above, with the specific housefly AE 7 . 5 and AE 7 . 6 primer pair, produced single amplicons of approximately 760 bp. This amplicon encompasses the highly conserved region involved in the catalytic site of the enzyme, coding for residues 96-304 of the translated sequence, including the site of the Trp to Leu mutation at amino acid residue 251 associated with malathion resistance in L. cuprina (FIG. 4 ). Cloning and sequencing of PCR amplicons (described earlier) from nine individual flies showed that the Ankara strain segregates for two allelic variants of the αE 7 gene: one has a Trp residue at amino acid position 251 , whereas the other has a Ser at this same position. This replacement is synonymous with the Trp to Leu substitution involved in malathion resistance in L. cuprina . Both leucine and serine replace a bulky tryptophan residue within the active site and we therefore propose that this change accounts for the observed changes in the kinetic properties of the enzymes towards carboxylesters and OPs. In a similar manner it is believed that the substitution of the bulky Trp residue with other smaller residues such as Ala, Ile, Gly, Val, Thr, Cys and Met will have a similar effect. The finding of these similar active site mutations in malathion resistant strains of both Lucilia and Musca further supports our conclusion that these mutations are responsible for malathion resistance in these species.

Hydrolytic Activity of the Expressed Products of the Susceptible and Malathion Resistant Alleles of Lcα 7

Below we describe the activities of the expressed products of the susceptible and malathion resistant alleles of LcαE 7 for various carboxylester and OP substrates. The results suggest a possible mechanism for malathion resistance in L. cuprina as a result of the mutation at nucleotide 752 in the LcαE 7 gene

a) In vitro Expression

The in vitro expression of the OP susceptible allele of LcαE 7 (clone Lc 743 ) is described in patent application PCT/AU 95/00016 (“Enzyme based bioremediation”).

The malathion resistant LcαE 7 full-length cDNA was cloned into the baculovirus transfer vector, Bacpac 6 (Clonetech) 3 ′ of the polyhedrin promoter. Transfections were conducted using a lipofection method with DOTAP (Boehringer Mannheim) as per King and Possee (The Baculovirus Expression System: A Laboratory Guide, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992). One μg of DNA of each of the resulting constructs together with 200 ng of Bacpac 6 baculovirus DNA (Clonetech), linearised by digestion with the restriction enzyme BSU 361 (Promega), was incubated in a solution of HBS (hepes buffered saline) containing 15% DOTAP (Boehringer Mannheim) in a polystyrene container at room temperature for 10 minutes. The solution was then used to transfect a single well of a six well tissue culture plate pre-seeded 2 hrs previously with 10 4 Sf9 ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) cells in 1.5 mls Grace's medium (King and Possee, The Baculovirus Expression System: A Laboratory Guide, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992). After 12 hours, the medium was replaced with 3 mls of Grace's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. Construct plus DOTAP, linearised virus plus DOTAP and DOTAP only controls were conducted in parallel with transfections. The transfections were harvested 4-5 days after infection and the cells isolated by centrifugation at 500 g for 5 minutes. Aliquots of the resulting cell pellets were immediately stored on ice, resuspended in 10 mM imidazole-HCl buffer, pH 7.0, containing 0.5% Triton X-100. Final protein concentrations in these cell extracts were between 5 and 40 mg/ml. Aliquots of the cell extracts were stored at −70° C. prior to enzyme assays.

b) Malathion Hydrolysis

Methods:

MCE activity was assayed using the partition method of Ziegler, R., Whyard, S., Downe, A. E. R., Wyatt, G. R. and Walker, V. K., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 28:279 (1987) as modified by Whyard, S., Russell, R. J. and Walker V. K. Biochemical Genetics 32:9 (1994). Cell extracts were diluted 300-fold in 10 mM imidazole-HCl, pH 7.0, and 150 μl aliquots were placed in triplicate microfuge tubes. Reactions were started by the addition of 1 μl ethanol containing [ 14 C]-malathion [Amersham; 103 mCi/mmole, 280 nCi, labelled at both the methylene carbons of the succinate moiety, adjusted to 15 mM (or 375μM-15 mM for kinetic experiments) by the addition of unlabelled malathion (99%; Riedel-de-Haèn Ag., Seelze, Germany)]. The assay mixture was incubated at 25° C. for 10 minutes, then 300 μl of dilution buffer was added and the undegraded malathion extracted three times with 600 μl of chloroform. The concentration of carboxylic acids of malathion in 300 μl of aqueous phase was determined by liquid scintillation. Protein concentrations in the cell supernatants were determined using the Biorad Protein Assay Kit by the method of Bradford, M., Analytical Biochemistry 72:248 (1976) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Boiled enzyme controls were performed routinely. The specific MCE activity of an extract of cells infected with non-recombinant baculovirus was at least 700-fold lower than that of cells infected with baculovirus encoding OP-susceptible or malathion-resistance alleles of LcαE 7 . This slight MCE activity that was not due to alleles of LcαE 7 was deemed a very minor source or error and subsequently ignored.

Results:

Using initial concentrations of malathion between 2.5 and 100 μM, MCE encoded by malathion resistant and susceptible alleles of LcαE 7 exhibited a good fit to Michaelis-Menten kinetics. K m and V max were calculated for both enzymes. K cat was then calculated from the V max and the molarity of the LcαE 7 products in their respective cell extracts. The molarity of susceptible LcαE 7 product in the cell extract was determined by titration with paraoxon as previously described in Newcomb, R. D., Campbell, P. M., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G., Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (in press). The molarity of the product of the malathion resistant allele of LcαE 7 was determined similarly, except that triphenylphosphate (TPP; 1 to 10×10 −8 M) was used instead of paraoxon. In a control experiment TPP (8×10 −8 M) was preincubated with cell extract in triplicate for 15, 30 or 45 minutes prior to addition of the substrate malathion. There was no significant difference between the residual MCE activity at each of the preincubation times, indicating firstly that the inhibition of MCE by TPP had gone to completion and secondly, that TPP was not being turned over by MCE.

The kinetic parameters for malathion hydrolysis for the products of the malathion resistant and susceptible alleles of LcαE 7 are:

	TABLE 5
	Expressed LcαE7 Gene Product	K m (μM)	K cat (min −1 )
	Malathion susceptible (strain LS2)	200 ± 30	70 ± 11
	Malathion resistant (strain RM-8)	21 ± 1	43 ± 1

The K m and K cat for the malathion resistant product are in reasonable agreement with those determined for the MCE enzyme purified from malathion resistant flies (11±0.4 μM and 46±2 per min, respectively; Whyard, S. and Walker, V. K., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 50: 198, 1994).

c) Sensitivity of MCE Activity to TPP

High sensitivity to inhibition by TPP is a distinctive characteristic of the MCE activity associated with malathion resistance in M. domestica, C. putoria and L. cuprina , consistent with potent synergism of malathion by TPP in resistant strains of these species (Shono, T., Applied and Entomological Zoology 18: 407, 1983; Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 10: 263, 1967; Townsend, M. G. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 12: 243, 1969; Hughes, P. B., Green, P. E. and Reichmann, K. G., Journal of Economic Entomology 77:

1400 , 1984: Smyth, K-A., Walker, V. K., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 54: 48, 1996). MCE activity encoded by the malathion resistant allele of LcαE 7 is potently inhibited by TPP, as indicated by stoichiometric inhibition of the enzyme at concentrations below 10 −7 M (see above).

d) α-Naphthyl Acetate Hydrolysis

Methods:

The initial rates of reactions between cell extracts containing the expressed products of the malathion resistant and susceptible LcαE 7 alleles and a-naphthyl acetate (α-NA) were determined at 25° C. using a recording spectrophotometer and the method of Mastrapaolo and Yourno (Analytical Biochemistry 115: 188, 1981). 6-200 μM α-NA dissolved in 10 μl of 2-methoxyethanol was added to 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (980 μl) in a quartz cuvette. α-Naphthyl acetate is slowly hydrolysed in water so a background rate was recorded before starting the enzymic reaction by the addition of 10 μl of diluted cell extract. Control reactions were performed with extracts of both uninfected cells and Bacpac 6 infected cells. These controls exhibited negligible enzymic hydrolysis.

Results:

Using initial concentrations of α-NA from 6 to 200 μM, the enzymes encoded by the malathion resistant and susceptible alleles of LcαE 7 exhibited a good fit to Michaelis-Menten kinetics. K m and V max were calculated for both enzymes. K cat was then calculated from the V max and the molarity of the LcαE 7 products in their respective cell extracts (determined above).

TABLE 6
Expressed LcαE7 Gene Product	K m (μM)	K cat (min −1 )
Malathion susceptible (strain LS2)	70 ± 5	11,000 ± 300
Malathion resistant (strain RM-8)	150 ± 50	2270 ± 30

The K m and K cat for the malathion resistant product are in reasonable agreement with those determined for the MCE enzyme purified from malathion resistant flies (167±14 μM and 2063 per min; Whyard, S. and Walker, V. K., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 50: 198, 1994).

e) α-Napthyl Butyrate Hydrolysis

Methods:

As described above for α-NA hydrolysis except that 6-200 μM α-naphthyl butyrate (α-NB) was used instead of α-NA.

Results:

Using initial concentrations of α-NB from 6 to 200 μM, the enzymes encoded by the malathion resistant and susceptible alleles of LcαE 7 exhibited a good fit to Michaelis-Menten kinetics. K m and V max were calculated for both enzymes. K cat was then calculated from the V max and the molarity of the LcαE 7 products in their respective cell extracts (determined above).

TABLE 7
Expressed LcαE7 Gene Product	K m (μM)	K cat (min −1 )
Malathion susceptible (strain LS2)	20 ± 5	18,000 ± 2,000
Malathion resistant (strain RM-8)	29 ± 4	9,000 ± 400

The K m and K cat for the malathion resistant product are in reasonable agreement with those determined for the MCE enzyme purified from malathion resistant flies (39±4 μM and 3700 per min; Whyard, S. and Walker, V. K., Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 50: 198, 1994).

f) General OP Hydrolysis

In M. domestics there is a pattern of cross-resistance among OPs (Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 10: 263, 1967) such that parathion/diazinon resistant flies generally exhibit greater resistance factors towards OPs with two ethoxy groups attached to the phosphorus atom (‘diethyl OPs’) rather than two methoxy groups (‘dimethyl OPs’). The converse pattern (ie greater resistance to dimethyl OPs) was observed for malathion resistant strains of M. domestica and C. putoria (Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 10: 263, 1967; Townsend, M. G. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 12: 243, 1969). This dimethyl OP preference applies both to malathion analogues (with carboxylester groups) and general OPs (without carboxylester groups). The implication of these studies is that there is a general OP hydrolase activity intimately associated with malathion type resistance and that this OP hydrolase exhibits a preference for dimethyl OPs.

There are insufficient published data to determine whether such a dimethyl/diethyl OP cross-resistance pattern occurs in L. cuprina . Here we determine firstly that there is such a cross resistance pattern and secondly that the enzyme encoded by the malathion resistance allele of LcαE 7 has hydrolytic activity against OPs which lack carboxylester groups.

Methods:

i) Toxicology:

The following organophosphorus compounds were used: diazinon (O,O-diethyl O-2-isopropyl-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl phosphorothioate, 91%, Mallinckrodt), parathion-methyl (O,O-dimethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate, 97.0%, Bayer), parathion (O,Odiethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate, 99%, Pestanal grade, Riedel-de-Haen), fenthion (O,O-dimethyl O-[3-methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl] phosphorothioate, 98.8%, Bayer), fenthionethyl (O,O-diethyl O-[3-methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl] phosphorothioate, a gift from Dr. G. Levot), dichlorvos (2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate, 99%, Chem Service), diethyl-dichlorvos (2,2-dichlorovinyl diethyl phosphate, a gift from Dr. J. Desmarchelier), di-isopropyl-dichlorvos (2,2dichlorovinyl di-isopropyl phosphate, a gift from Dr. J. Desmarchelier), malathion (S-1,2-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)ethyl O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate, technical grade, Nufarm), isopropyl malathion (S-1,2-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)ethyl O,O-di-isopropyl phosphorodithioate, a gift from Dr. J. Desmarchelier).

The toxicity of OPs in adult female L. cuprina was determined 3 or 4 days post-eclosion by application of OPs to the scutellum in 0.7 μl dioctylphthalate (Busvine, J. R., Bell, J. D. and Guneidy, A. M., Bulletin of Entomological Research 54: 589, 1963;; Townsend, M. G. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 12: 243, 1969). Each OP was applied to at least 20 flies at each of at least 5 different concentrations, spanning the dose causing 50% mortality (LD 50 ). Control groups were treated with solvent but no OP. Mortality was determined 24 hours later. Data were fitted to the probit curve using the P robit O r LO git (POLO-PC) computer program (LeOra Software, 1987). This program corrects for natural mortality which was <5%. The statistic g (“index of significance for potency estimation”) was always less than 0.5 for the 95% confidence limits of LD 50 .

ii) Chlorfenvinphos Hydrolysis Assay:

Enzyme samples were diluted in 0.1 M imidazole-HCl buffer pH 7.0 (“imidazole buffer”) to a final volume of 50μl. Reactions were started by the addition 0.5 μl of ( 14 C-ethyl)-chlorfenvinphos (CVP, 306.5 MBq/mmole, Internationale Isotope Munchen) from a 7.5 mM stock solution in ethanol. The reaction was incubated at 30° C. and stopped by the addition of 300 μl dichloromethane and 150 μl of water followed by vigorous vortex mixing. The reactions were centrifuged to separate phases and 150 μl of the upper, aqueous phase was taken for scintillation counting to determine the amount of 14 C-diethylphosphate produced by hydrolysis of CVP. Incubations with boiled enzyme were also performed to control for non-enzymic hydrolysis of CVP.

Results:

I) Toxicology:

LD 50 s of 10 OPs were determined for the Woodside 5.2 strain (homozygous for a malathion resistance allele of LcαE 7 ) and the Llandillo 103 strain (homozygous for a parathion/diazinon resistance allele of LcαE 7 ). LD 50 s were also determined for the OP susceptible LS2 strain in order to calculate resistance factors (Table 8). Woodside 5.2 flies exhibited about two- to five-fold greater resistance factors towards the dimethyl OPs, parathion-methyl, fenthion and dichlorvos than to their diethyl analogues, parathion, fenthion-ethyl and ethyl dichlorvos. Conversely, Llandillo 103 flies exhibited about two-fold greater resistance factors towards the diethyl OPs, parathion and ethyl dichlorvos, than to their dimethyl analogues, parathion-methyl and dichlorvos. However, there was no significant difference between the resistance factors of Llandillo 103 flies for fenthion and fenthion-ethyl.

Among four diethyl OPs, Llandillo 103 flies have higher resistance factors than Woodside 5.2 flies (except fenthion-ethyl with similar resistance factors; Table 8). In contrast, Woodside 5.2 flies have higher resistance factors than Llandillo 103 for each of four dimethyl OPs. Thus both strains exhibit general OP resistance of similar potency, albeit with a bias towards either dimethyl or diethyl OPs.

Neither resistant strain exhibited more than 3-fold resistance to the di-isopropyl analogues of dichlorvos or malathion (Table 8).

Comparable data from M. domestics are available for seven of the test compounds. In each case resistance factors are similar in strains of the two species exhibiting parallel resistance types (Table 8).

TABLE 8
OP cross-resistance patterns in adult L. cuprina with comparisons to M. domestica
	LD 50 2 LS2	LD 50 Llandillo 103	LD 50 Woodside 5.2	RF 3	RF
OP Compounds 1	(OP Susceptible)	(Dz/para Resistant)	(Mal Resistant)	(Dz/para R)	(Mal R)
Diazinon (E)	57 (40-79),	550 (490-630),	270 (240-300),	10 (20)	5 (2)
	3.5 ± 0.5	4.9 ± 0.7	5.1 ± 0.6
Parathion-methyl (M)	16 (11-20),	185 (141-244),	430 (390-490),	12 (9)	27 (10)
	6.5 ± 0.8	3.4 ± 0.5	9.7 ± 1.5
Parathion (E)	52 (48-55),	1050 (890-1280),	290 (270-310),	20 (35)	6 (3)
	9.2 ± 1.1	6.8 ± 1.2	13.3 ± 2.3
Fenthion (M)	61 (42-87),	210 (180-240)	320 (210-490)	3 (3)	5 (7)
	5.2 ± 0.7	8.7 ± 1.5	3.9 ± 0.7
Fenthion-ethyl (E)	330 (290-370)	690 (570-830)	730 (660-870)	2	2
	7.4 ± 1.1	8.7 ± 1.5	13.4 ± 2.6
Dichlorvos (M)	41 (35-51),	150 (95-190),	270 (210-340)	4 (3)	7 (6)
	8.2 ± 1.1	5.1 ± 0.8	6.3 ± 1.0
Ethyl Dichlorvos (E)	360 (300-420),	2370 (2320-2410),	1100 (700-1500)	7	3
	5.0 ± 0.8	54 ± 14	4.9 ± 1.2
Isopropyl Dichlorvos (P)	3500 (2200-4800),	4600 (3400-5900)	10200 (8800-12000)	NS	3
	4.1 ± 0.6	4.1 ± 0.5	8.1 ± 1.4
Malathion (M)	550 (480-610),	490 (360-600)	4	NS (2)	>130 (157)
	6.4 ± 1.2	4.2 ± 0.9
Isopropyl Malathion (P)	3600 (2700-4900),	4900 (3700-6200),	6400 (5900-7100),	NS	1.8 (4)
	6.3 ± 0.7	8.5 ± 1.7	10.1 ± 1.8
1 Dimethyl (M), diethyl (E) or di-isopropyl (P) OPs.
2 LD 50 (ng/fly) with 95% confidence limits, slope and standard error of the probit regression line.
3 Resistance Factors: ratio of the LD 50 of Llandillo 103 or Woodside 5.2 with the LD 50 of LS2. “NS” indicates an RF not significantly different from unity. Resistance factors of M. domestica of the appropriate resistance type are shown in parentheses (Bell, J. D. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 10: 263, 1967; ; Townsend, M. G. and Busvine, J. R., Entomology Experimental and Applied 12: 243, 1969).
4 No mortality at this dose.

ii) Chlorfenvinphos Hydrolytic Activity of Whole Fly Homogenates and Expressed LcαE 7 Gene Products:

Whole fly homogenates of malathion resistant (strains RM-8, 60NE 1.1, 4.2, Beverly 6.2, Hampton Hill 6.1,Hampton Hill 6.2, Woodside 5.2, Rop Rmal 1, M22.2 6.3, M27.1 4.1), diazinon resistant (Gunning 107, Inverell 22, Q4, RM2.6, Llandillo 103, Sunbury 5.2) and susceptible (LBB 101, Llandillo 104, LS 2 ) strains of L. cuprina were tested for esterase-mediated hydrolysis of CVP, a general OP (ie not a malathion-type OP). All 10 malathion resistant strains had greater CVP hydrolytic activities (1.5-3.0 pmol/min/mg) than the 3 susceptible strains (0.5-1.0 pmol/min/mg, but less activity than the 6 diazinon resistant strains (8.2-30.0 pmol/min/mg).

The expressed product of the malathion resistant LcαE 7 allele was tested for CVP hydrolytic activity. Turnover of 75 μM CVP was about 1.2 hour −1 , which is approximately 50-fold less than that of the diazinon resistant (RM 2 - 6 ) LcαE 7 gene product but much greater than that of the OP-susceptible (LS 2 ) gene product, for which CVP activity was undetectable. [The CVP hydrolytic activity of the gene products of the RM 2 - 6 and LS 2 alleles of LcαE 7 are described in patent application PCT/AU 95/00016: “Enzyme based bioremediation”].

g) Conclusions

1. We have discovered that dimethyl versus diethyl patterns of OP cross-resistance among strains of L. cuprina parallel those of OP resistant strains of M. domestica and C. putoria . The two OP resistance types are equally potent and general among most OPs (excluding malathion), albeit with a dimethyl or diethyl OP preference.

2. Diethyl OP hydrolytic activities encoded by the OP susceptible allele (nil), the malathion resistant allele (1.2 hour −1 ) and the diazinon/parathion resistant alleles of LcαE 7 (˜1 min −1 ) parallel the diethyl OP hydrolytic activities in homogenates of OP susceptible (low), malathion resistant (intermediate) and diazinon/parathion resistant (high) L. cuprina strains.

3. Taking points 1 and 2 together we propose that the dimethyl versus diethyl pattern of general OP cross resistance reflects the substrate specificity of the general OP hydrolase activities encoded by the two alternative OP resistance alleles of the αE 7 gene. Thus we expect that products of malathion resistance alleles of αE 7 genes from L. cuprina and M. domestica will exhibit dimethyl OP hydrolysis with kinetics that are as favourable for bioremediation as the diazinon/parathion resistance αE 7 alleles are for diethyl OPs.

4. The enhanced MCE activity of the product of the malathion resistance alleles of αE 7 genes causes flies to survive more than 100-fold greater doses of malathion. The MCE activity is enhanced in two ways. Firstly, it has more favourable kinetics for malathion breakdown than that of the susceptible allele (K cat /K m is 6-fold greater). Secondly, it has acquired general OP hydrolase activity. The latter is important for both resistance and bioremediation because it enables the enzyme to recover its MCE activity after phosphorylation/inhibition by the ‘activated’ or ‘P=O’ form of OP insecticides. P=O OPs are encountered in an insect because they are generated by an insect's metabolism. For bioremediation the OP hydrolase is required for two reasons; firstly, to hydrolyse general OPs where these are the main contaminant, and secondly, to ensure that malathion hydrolysis by the enzyme will continue in the presence of minor contamination with ‘P=O’ OPs.

Allelism of the Malathion and Diazinon/Parathion Resistance Phenotypes in L. Cuprina

It is clear from the above molecular genetic and biochemical data that malathion resistance in L. cuprina is conferred by a structural mutation in the active site of LcαE 7 (esterase E 3 ), the same gene that is involved in resistance to diazinon/parathion type OPs. However, two classical genetic studies have detected a small number of presumptive recombinants between the malathion and diazinon resistance phenotypes in L. cuprina , which would suggest that they are separate, albeit closely linked, genes (Raftos, D. A. and Hughes, P. B., Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 553, 1986; Smyth, K-A., Russell, R. J. and Oakeshott, J. G., Biochemical Genetics 32: 437, 1994).

The availability of frozen extracts from three of the five presumptive recombinants generated by the study of Smyth et al. (1994) enabled the authors to test them directly for the predicted genotypes using PCR techniques. In this particular study, diazinon resistant males (strain Q 4 ) were crossed to malathion resistant females (strain RM- 8 ) and the F 1 females backcrossed to Q 4 males. Progeny were scored for the E 3 -non-staining, high MCE phenotypes as indicative of resistance to both diazinon and malathion. Five presumably recombinant individuals showing the MCE high/E 3 non-staining phenotype were recovered from 692 backcross progeny; none were recovered with the reciprocal MCE low/E 3 staining phenotype, which would presumably be susceptible to both malathion and diazinon.

Methods:

The regions of the LcαE 7 gene surrounding the diazinon resistance (Gly to Asp substitution at position 137 ) and malathion resistance (Trp to Leu at position 251 ) mutations were amplified from each of the three available extracts from the Smyth et al., (1994) study, using the 7 F 1 / 7 R 2 and 7 F 7 / 7 R 4 primer sets, respectively. The PCR conditions and primers (except 7 F 7 ) are as described above, except that an annealing temperature of 55° C. and a buffer supplied by the manufacturer of Taq DNA polymerase (BRL; 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.4, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 ) were used. The 7 F 7 primer has the sequence:5′ tgctgcctctacccactacat 3í and its 5′ position in the Lc 743 sequence is nucleotide 660 (see FIG. 1 ).

The 330 nt fragment of LcaE 7 generated by the 7 F 7 / 7 R 4 primer set contains an RFLP polymorphism specific for each of the Q 4 and RM- 8 alleles: an Ncol cleavage site at nucleotide position 752 marks the Q 4 allele (this polymorphism is at the site of the Trp to Leu mutation responsible for malathion resistance), while a Bgl 1 site at position 796 characterises the RM- 8 allele. Therefore, in order to identify the Q 4 and RM- 8 alleles in each extract, PCR products were digested directly with each restriction enzyme and the products sized by agarose gel electrophoresis, using standard techniques (Sambrook, J., Fritsch. E. F. and Maniatis, T., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA, 1989). Controls contained PCR products generated from Q 4 and RM- 8 genomic DNA.

No such convenient RFLP polymorphisms were contained in the 326 nt fragment amplified by the 7 F 1 / 7 R 2 primer set (this fragment contains a 68 nt intron at nucleotide position 360 ). However, three nucleotide polymorphisms distinguish the Q 4 and RM- 8 fragments: an A to T substitution at nucleotide position 303 , T to C at position 345 and G to A at position 410 in the Q 4 sequence (the latter substitution is responsible for diazinon/parathion resistance). PCR products were therefore cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) using standard techniques (Sambrook, J., Fritsch. E. F. and Maniatis, T., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA, 1989) and individual clones sequenced using commercially available SP6 and T7 primers and dye terminator technology, as described above.

Results:

Digestion of the PCR products generated by the 7 F 7 / 7 R 4 primer set with either Nco 1 or Bgl 1 revealed the presence of only the RM- 8 chromosome in all three extracts (ie PCR products could be cleaved by Bgl 1 and not Nco 1 , whereas the products of the control Q 4 genomic DNA were readily digested with Nco 1 ; data not shown). Curiously, the Q 4 allele was not amplified from any of the extracts despite the fact that F 1 progeny were backcrossed to Q 4 in the crossing regime.

Two out of three clones derived from the first extract, and two out of two clones derived from a second, contained polymorphisms characteristic of the Q 4 allele at positions 303 and 345 and the polymorphism characteristic of RM- 8 at position 410 . On the other hand, the third clone derived from the first extract and a single clone derived from the third extract contained all three polymorphisms characteristic of RM- 8 . Again, no fragments generated entirely from the Q 4 chromosome were found among the cloned DNAs.

Conclusions:

1. The Q 4 allele was not amplified from any of the extracts despite the fact that F 1 progeny were backcrossed to Q 4 and would therefore be expected to contain at least one copy of the Q 4 fourth chromosome.

2. Progeny homozygous for the Q 4 allele would be expected if the malathion resistance mutation was located on a gene separate from LcαE 7 . No such progeny were found.

3. No MCE low/E 3 staining (presumably susceptible to both malathion and diazinon) progeny were recovered, which would be expected if E 3 and MCE were separate genes.

4. At least two of the extracts contained a fourth chromosome that was a Q 4 /RM- 8 recombinant somewhere in the region of the LcαE 7 gene 5 ′ to the Gly to Asp mutation at nucleotide position 410 . The origin of flies carrying this fourth chromosome and the MCE activity/PAGE phenotype of the resultant chimeric protein are unknown.

5. It is clear that none of the putative E 3 /MCE recombinants were the outcome of simple reciprocal recombination events during the crossing programs; they do not, therefore, constitute proof that the E 3 and MCE genes are separate genes.

It is clear from the present invention that malathion resistance in L. cuprina is the result of a structural mutation in the LcαE 7 (E 3 ) gene, the same gene which mutates to give resistance to diazinon/parathion type OPs. In other words, the MCE and E 3 genes are probably allelic and not separated by 0.7 map units as previous classical genetic studies had indicated. The allelism of the two resistance mutations explains the observation of Smyth, K-A.,Russell,R. J. and Oakeshott,J. G. (Biochemical Genetics 32:437, 1994) that there is a negative association between malathion-type OP resistance and diazinon/parathion type OP resistance. The presence of malathion-type resistance alleles in a population would therefore suggest the use of diethyl OPs for combating flystrike, while the presence of diazinon/parathion-type resistance alleles would suggest the use of dimethyl OPs.

The MCE enzyme produced by the method of the present invention may be used to develop a functional in vitro assay for the degradation of carboxylester and dimethyl type OPs in much the same way as the E 3 enzyme (Patent: Enzyme Based Bioremediation) has been used to develop an in vitro assay for the general OP hydrolysis. Used together, such assays provide scope for screening for alternative OPs that might overcome resistance problems by E 3 -like enzymes.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

43 1 1713 DNA Lucilia cuprina 1atgaatttca acgttagttt gatggagaaa ttaaaatgga agattaaatg cattgaaaat 60aagtttttaa actatcgttt aactaccaat gaaacggtgg tagctgaaac tgaatatggc 120aaagtgaaag gcgttaaacg tttaactgtg tacgatgatt cctactacag ttttgagggt 180ataccgtacg cccaaccgcc agtgggtgag ctgagattta aagcacccca gcgaccaaca 240ccctgggatg gtgtgcgtga ttgttgcaat cataaagata agtcagtgca agttgatttt 300ataacgggca aagtgtgtgg ctcagaggat tgtctatacc taagtgtcta tacgaataat 360ctaaatcccg aaactaaacg tcccgtttta gtatacatac atggtggtgg ttttattatc 420ggtgaaaatc atcgtgatat gtatggtcct gattatttca ttaaaaagga tgtggtgttg 480attaacatac aatatcgttt gggagctcta ggttttctaa gtttaaattc agaagacctt 540aatgtgcccg gtaatgccgg ccttaaagat caagtcatgg ccttgcgttg gattaaaaat 600aattgcgcca actttggtgg caatcccgat aatattacag tctttggtga aagtgccggt 660gctgcctcta cccactacat gatgttaacc gaacaaactc gcggtctttt ccatcgtggt 720atactaatgt cgggtaatgc tatttgtcca ttggctaata cccaatgtca acatcgtgcc 780ttcaccttag ccaaattggc cggctataag ggtgaggata atgataagga tgttttggaa 840tttcttatga aagccaagcc acaggattta ataaaacttg aggaaaaagt tttaactcta 900gaagagcgta caaataaggt catgtttcct tttggtccca ctgttgagcc atatcagacc 960gctgattgtg tcttacccaa acatcctcgg gaaatggtta aaactgcttg gggtaattcg 1020atacccacta tgatgggtaa cacttcatat gagggtctat ttttcacttc aattcttaag 1080caaatgccta tgcttgttaa ggaattggaa acttgtgtca attttgtgcc aagtgaattg 1140gctgatgttg aacgcaccgc cccagagacc ttggaaatgg gtgctaaaat taaaaaggct 1200catgttacag gagaaacacc aacagctgat aattttatgg atctttgctc tcacatctat 1260ttctggttcc ccatgcatcg tttgttgcaa ttacgtttca atcacacctc cggtacaccc 1320gtctacttgt atcgcttcga cttcgattcg gaagatctta tcaatcccta tcgtattatg 1380cgtagtggac gtggtgttaa gggtgttagt catgctgatg aattaaccta tttcttctgg 1440aatcaattgg ccaaacgtat gcctaaagaa tcgcgtgaat acaaaacaat tgaacgtatg 1500actggtatat ggatacaatt tgccaccact ggtaatcctt atagcaatga aattgaaggt 1560atggaaaatg tttcctggga tccaattaag aaatccgatg aagtatacaa gtgtttgaat 1620attagtgatg aattgaaaat gattgatgtg cctgaaatgg ataagattaa acaatgggag 1680tcgatgtttg aaaaacatag agatttattt tag 1713 2 570 PRT Lucilia cuprina 2Met Asn Phe Asn Val Ser Leu Met Glu Lys Leu Lys Trp Lys Ile Lys 1 5 10 15Cys Ile Glu Asn Lys Phe Leu Asn Tyr Arg Leu Thr Thr Asn Glu Thr 20 25 30Val Val Ala Glu Thr Glu Tyr Gly Lys Val Lys Gly Val Lys Arg Leu 35 40 45Thr Val Tyr Asp Asp Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Phe Glu Gly Ile Pro Tyr Ala 50 55 60Gln Pro Pro Val Gly Glu Leu Arg Phe Lys Ala Pro Gln Arg Pro Thr 65 70 75 80Pro Trp Asp Gly Val Arg Asp Cys Cys Asn His Lys Asp Lys Ser Val 85 90 95Gln Val Asp Phe Ile Thr Gly Lys Val Cys Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 100 105 110Tyr Leu Ser Val Tyr Thr Asn Asn Leu Asn Pro Glu Thr Lys Arg Pro 115 120 125Val Leu Val Tyr Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Ile Gly Glu Asn His 130 135 140Arg Asp Met Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Ile Lys Lys Asp Val Val Leu145 150 155 160Ile Asn Ile Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Ala Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Asn 165 170 175Ser Glu Asp Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 180 185 190Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Ile Lys Asn Asn Cys Ala Asn Phe Gly Gly Asn 195 200 205Pro Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Ala Ala Ser Thr 210 215 220His Tyr Met Met Leu Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly225 230 235 240Ile Leu Met Ser Gly Asn Ala Ile Cys Pro Leu Ala Asn Thr Gln Cys 245 250 255Gln His Arg Ala Phe Thr Leu Ala Lys Leu Ala Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 260 265 270Asp Asn Asp Lys Asp Val Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Lys Pro Gln 275 280 285Asp Leu Ile Lys Leu Glu Glu Lys Val Leu Thr Leu Glu Glu Arg Thr 290 295 300Asn Lys Val Met Phe Pro Phe Gly Pro Thr Val Glu Pro Tyr Gln Thr305 310 315 320Ala Asp Cys Val Leu Pro Lys His Pro Arg Glu Met Val Lys Thr Ala 325 330 335Trp Gly Asn Ser Ile Pro Thr Met Met Gly Asn Thr Ser Tyr Glu Gly 340 345 350Leu Phe Phe Thr Ser Ile Leu Lys Gln Met Pro Met Leu Val Lys Glu 355 360 365Leu Glu Thr Cys Val Asn Phe Val Pro Ser Glu Leu Ala Asp Ala Glu 370 375 380Arg Thr Ala Pro Glu Thr Leu Glu Met Gly Ala Lys Ile Lys Lys Ala385 390 395 400His Val Thr Gly Glu Thr Pro Thr Ala Asp Asn Phe Met Asp Leu Cys 405 410 415Ser His Ile Tyr Phe Trp Phe Pro Met His Arg Leu Leu Gln Leu Arg 420 425 430Phe Asn His Thr Ser Gly Thr Pro Val Tyr Leu Tyr Arg Phe Asp Phe 435 440 445Asp Ser Glu Asp Leu Ile Asn Pro Tyr Arg Ile Met Arg Ser Gly Arg 450 455 460Gly Val Lys Gly Val Ser His Ala Asp Glu Leu Thr Tyr Phe Phe Trp465 470 475 480Asn Gln Leu Ala Lys Arg Met Pro Lys Glu Ser Arg Glu Tyr Lys Thr 485 490 495Ile Glu Arg Met Thr Gly Ile Trp Ile Gln Phe Ala Thr Thr Gly Asn 500 505 510Pro Tyr Ser Asn Glu Ile Glu Gly Met Glu Asn Val Ser Trp Asp Pro 515 520 525Ile Lys Lys Ser Asp Glu Val Tyr Lys Cys Leu Asn Ile Ser Asp Glu 530 535 540Leu Lys Met Ile Asp Val Pro Glu Met Asp Lys Ile Lys Gln Trp Glu545 550 555 560Ser Met Phe Glu Lys His Arg Asp Leu Phe 565 570 3 1713 DNA Lucilia cuprina 3atgaatttca acgttagttt gatggagaaa ttaaaatgga agattaaatg cattgaaaat 60aagtttttaa actatcgttt aactaccaat gaaacggtgg tagctgaaac tgaatatggc 120aaagtgaaag gcgttaaacg tttaactgtg tacgatgatt cctactacag ttttgagggt 180ataccgtacg cccaaccgcc agtgggtgag ctgagattta aagcacccca gcgaccaaca 240ccctgggatg gtgtgcgcga ttgttgcaat cataaagata agtcagtgca agttgatttt 300ataacgggca aagtgtgtgg ctcagaggat tgtctatacc taagtgtcta tacgaataat 360ctaaatcccg aaactaaacg tcccgtttta gtatacatac atggtggtgg ttttattatc 420ggtgaaaatc atcgtgatat gtatggtcct gattatttca ttaaaaagga tgtggtgttg 480attaacatac aatatcgttt gggagctcta ggttttctaa gtttaaattc agaagacctt 540aatgtgcccg gtaatgccgg ccttaaagat caagtcatgg ccttgcgttg gattaaaaat 600aattgcgcca actttggtgg caatcccgat aatattacag tctttggtga aagtgccggt 660gctgcctcta cccactacat gatgttaacc gaacaaactc gcggtctttt ccatcgtggt 720atactaatgt cgggtaatgc tatttgtcca ttggctaata cccaatgtca acatcgtgcc 780ttcaccttag ccaaattggc cggctataag ggtgaggata atgataagga tgttttggaa 840tttcttatga aagccaagcc acaggattta ataaaacttg aggaaaaagt tttaactcta 900gaagagcgta caaataaggt catgtttcct tttggtccca ctgttgagcc atatcagacc 960gctgattgtg tcttacccaa acatcctcgg gaaatggtta aaactgcttg gggtaattcg 1020atacccacta tgatgggtaa cacttcatat gagggtctat ttttcacttc aattcttaag 1080caaatgccta tgcttgttaa ggaattggaa acttgtgtca attttgtgcc aagtgaattg 1140gctgatgctg aacgcaccgc cccagagacc ttggaaatgg gtgctaaaat taaaaaggct 1200catgttacag gagaaacacc aacagctgat aattttatgg atctttgctc tcacatctat 1260ttctggttcc ccatgcatcg tttgttgcaa ttacgtttca atcacacctc cggtacaccc 1320gtctacttgt atcgcttcga cttcgattcg gaagatctta tcaatcccta tcgtattatg 1380cgtagtggac gtggtgttaa gggtgttagt catgctgatg aattaaccta tttcttctgg 1440aatcaattgg ccaaacgtat gcctaaagaa tcgcgtgaat acaaaacaat tgaacgtatg 1500actggtatat ggatacaatt tgccaccact ggtaatcctt atagcaatga aattgaaggt 1560atggaaaatg tttcctggga tccaattaag aaatccgatg aagtatacaa gtgtttgaat 1620attagtgatg aattgaaaat gattgatgtg cctgaaatgg ataagattaa acaatgggag 1680tcgatgtttg aaaaacatag agatttattt tag 1713 4 570 PRT Lucilia cuprina 4Met Asn Phe Asn Val Ser Leu Met Glu Lys Leu Lys Trp Lys Ile Lys 1 5 10 15Cys Ile Glu Asn Lys Phe Leu Asn Tyr Arg Leu Thr Thr Asn Glu Thr 20 25 30Val Val Ala Glu Thr Glu Tyr Gly Lys Val Lys Gly Val Lys Arg Leu 35 40 45Thr Val Tyr Asp Asp Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Phe Glu Gly Ile Pro Tyr Ala 50 55 60Gln Pro Pro Val Gly Glu Leu Arg Phe Lys Ala Pro Gln Arg Pro Thr 65 70 75 80Pro Trp Asp Gly Val Arg Asp Cys Cys Asn His Lys Asp Lys Ser Val 85 90 95Gln Val Asp Phe Ile Thr Gly Lys Val Cys Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 100 105 110Tyr Leu Ser Val Tyr Thr Asn Asn Leu Asn Pro Glu Thr Lys Arg Pro 115 120 125Val Leu Val Tyr Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Ile Gly Glu Asn His 130 135 140Arg Asp Met Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Ile Lys Lys Asp Val Val Leu145 150 155 160Ile Asn Ile Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Ala Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Asn 165 170 175Ser Glu Asp Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 180 185 190Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Ile Lys Asn Asn Cys Ala Asn Phe Gly Gly Asn 195 200 205Pro Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Ala Ala Ser Thr 210 215 220His Tyr Met Met Leu Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly225 230 235 240Ile Leu Met Ser Gly Asn Ala Ile Cys Pro Leu Ala Asn Thr Gln Cys 245 250 255Gln His Arg Ala Phe Thr Leu Ala Lys Leu Ala Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 260 265 270Asp Asn Asp Lys Asp Val Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Lys Pro Gln 275 280 285Asp Leu Ile Lys Leu Glu Glu Lys Val Leu Thr Leu Glu Glu Arg Thr 290 295 300Asn Lys Val Met Phe Pro Phe Gly Pro Thr Val Glu Pro Tyr Gln Thr305 310 315 320Ala Asp Cys Val Leu Pro Lys His Pro Arg Glu Met Val Lys Thr Ala 325 330 335Trp Gly Asn Ser Ile Pro Thr Met Met Gly Asn Thr Ser Tyr Glu Gly 340 345 350Leu Phe Phe Thr Ser Ile Leu Lys Gln Met Pro Met Leu Val Lys Glu 355 360 365Leu Glu Thr Cys Val Asn Phe Val Pro Ser Glu Leu Ala Asp Ala Glu 370 375 380Arg Thr Ala Pro Glu Thr Leu Glu Met Gly Ala Lys Ile Lys Lys Ala385 390 395 400His Val Thr Gly Glu Thr Pro Thr Ala Asp Asn Phe Met Asp Leu Cys 405 410 415Ser His Ile Tyr Phe Trp Phe Pro Met His Arg Leu Leu Gln Leu Arg 420 425 430Phe Asn His Thr Ser Gly Thr Pro Val Tyr Leu Tyr Arg Phe Asp Phe 435 440 445Asp Ser Glu Asp Leu Ile Asn Pro Tyr Arg Ile Met Arg Ser Gly Arg 450 455 460Gly Val Lys Gly Val Ser His Ala Asp Glu Leu Thr Tyr Phe Phe Trp465 470 475 480Asn Gln Leu Ala Lys Arg Met Pro Lys Glu Ser Arg Glu Tyr Lys Thr 485 490 495Ile Glu Arg Met Thr Gly Ile Trp Ile Gln Phe Ala Thr Thr Gly Asn 500 505 510Pro Tyr Ser Asn Glu Ile Glu Gly Met Glu Asn Val Ser Trp Asp Pro 515 520 525Ile Lys Lys Ser Asp Glu Val Tyr Lys Cys Leu Asn Ile Ser Asp Glu 530 535 540Leu Lys Met Ile Asp Val Pro Glu Met Asp Lys Ile Lys Gln Trp Glu545 550 555 560Ser Met Phe Glu Lys His Arg Asp Leu Phe 565 570 5 1713 DNA Lucilia cuprina 5atgaatttca acgttagttt gatggagaaa ttaaaatgga agattaaatg cattgaaaat 60aagtttttaa actatcgttt aactaccaat gaaacggtgg tagctgaaac tgaatatggc 120aaagtgaaag gcgttaaacg tttaactgtg tacgatgatt cctactacag ttttgagggt 180ataccgtacg cccaaccgcc agtgggtgag ctgagattta aagcacccca gcgaccaaca 240ccctgggatg gtgtgcgtga ttgttgcaat cataaagata agtcagtgca agttgatttt 300ataacgggca aagtgtgtgg ctcagaggat tgtctatacc taagtgtcta tacgaataat 360ctaaatcccg aaactaaacg tcccgtttta gtatacatac atggtggtgg ttttattatc 420ggtgaaaatc atcgtgatat gtatggtcct gattatttca ttaaaaagga tgtggtgttg 480attaacatac aatatcgttt gggagctcta ggttttctaa gtttaaattc agaagacctt 540aatgtgcccg gtaatgccgg ccttaaagat caagtcatgg ccttgcattg gattaaaaat 600aattgcgcca actttggtgg caatcccgat aatattacag tctttggtga aagtgccggt 660gctgcctcta cccactacat gatgttaacc gaacaaactc gcggtctttt ccatcgtggt 720atactaatgt cgggtaatgc tatttgtcca ttggctaata cccaatgtca acatcgtgcc 780ttcaccttag ccaaattggc cggctataag ggtgagaata atgataagga tgttttggaa 840tttcttatga aagccaagcc acaggattta gtaaaacttg aggaaaaagt tttaactcta 900gaagagcgta caaataaggt catgtttcct tttggtccca ctgttgagcc atatcagacc 960gctgattgtg tcttacccaa acatcctcgg gaaatggtta aaactgcttg gggtaattcg 1020atacccacta tgatgggtaa cacttcatat gagggtctat ttttcacttc aattcttaag 1080caaatgccta tgcttgttaa ggaattggaa acttgtgtca attttgtgcc aagtgaattg 1140gctgatgctg aacgcaccgc cccagagacc ttggaaatgg gtgctaaaat taaaaaggct 1200catgttacag gagaaacacc aacagctgat aattttatgg atctttgctc tcacatctat 1260ttctggttcc ccatgcatcg tttgttgcaa ttacgtttca atcacacctc cggtacaccc 1320gtctacttgt atcgcttcga cttcgattcg gaagatctta tcaatcccta tcgtattatg 1380cgtagtggac gtggtgttaa gggtgttagt catgctgatg aattaaccta tttcttctgg 1440aatcaattgg ccaaacgtat gcctaaagaa tcgcgtgaat acaaaacaat tgaacgtatg 1500actggtatat ggatacaatt tgccaccact ggtaatcctt atagcaatga aattgaaggt 1560atggaaaatg tttcctggga tccaattaag aaatccgatg aagtatacaa gtgtttgaat 1620attagtgatg aattgaaaat gattgatgtg cctgaaatgg ataagattaa acaatgggag 1680tcgatgtttg aaaaacatag agatttattt tag 1713 6 570 PRT Lucilia cuprina 6Met Asn Phe Asn Val Ser Leu Met Glu Lys Leu Lys Trp Lys Ile Lys 1 5 10 15Cys Ile Glu Asn Lys Phe Leu Asn Tyr Arg Leu Thr Thr Asn Glu Thr 20 25 30Val Val Ala Glu Thr Glu Tyr Gly Lys Val Lys Gly Val Lys Arg Leu 35 40 45Thr Val Tyr Asp Asp Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Phe Glu Gly Ile Pro Tyr Ala 50 55 60Gln Pro Pro Val Gly Glu Leu Arg Phe Lys Ala Pro Gln Arg Pro Thr 65 70 75 80Pro Trp Asp Gly Val Arg Asp Cys Cys Asn His Lys Asp Lys Ser Val 85 90 95Gln Val Asp Phe Ile Thr Gly Lys Val Cys Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 100 105 110Tyr Leu Ser Val Tyr Thr Asn Asn Leu Asn Pro Glu Thr Lys Arg Pro 115 120 125Val Leu Val Tyr Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Ile Gly Glu Asn His 130 135 140Arg Asp Met Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Ile Lys Lys Asp Val Val Leu145 150 155 160Ile Asn Ile Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Ala Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Asn 165 170 175Ser Glu Asp Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 180 185 190Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Ile Lys Asn Asn Cys Ala Asn Phe Gly Gly Asn 195 200 205Pro Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Ala Ala Ser Thr 210 215 220His Tyr Met Met Leu Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly225 230 235 240Ile Leu Met Ser Gly Asn Ala Ile Cys Pro Leu Ala Asn Thr Gln Cys 245 250 255Gln His Arg Ala Phe Thr Leu Ala Lys Leu Ala Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 260 265 270Asp Asn Asp Lys Asp Val Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Lys Pro Gln 275 280 285Asp Leu Ile Lys Leu Glu Glu Lys Val Leu Thr Leu Glu Glu Arg Thr 290 295 300Asn Lys Val Met Phe Pro Phe Gly Pro Thr Val Glu Pro Tyr Gln Thr305 310 315 320Ala Asp Cys Val Leu Pro Lys His Pro Arg Glu Met Val Lys Thr Ala 325 330 335Trp Gly Asn Ser Ile Pro Thr Met Met Gly Asn Thr Ser Tyr Glu Gly 340 345 350Leu Phe Phe Thr Ser Ile Leu Lys Gln Met Pro Met Leu Val Lys Glu 355 360 365Leu Glu Thr Cys Val Asn Phe Val Pro Ser Glu Leu Ala Asp Ala Glu 370 375 380Arg Thr Ala Pro Glu Thr Leu Glu Met Gly Ala Lys Ile Lys Lys Ala385 390 395 400His Val Thr Gly Glu Thr Pro Thr Ala Asp Asn Phe Met Asp Leu Cys 405 410 415Ser His Ile Tyr Phe Trp Phe Pro Met His Arg Leu Leu Gln Leu Arg 420 425 430Phe Asn His Thr Ser Gly Thr Pro Val Tyr Leu Tyr Arg Phe Asp Phe 435 440 445Asp Ser Glu Asp Leu Ile Asn Pro Tyr Arg Ile Met Arg Ser Gly Arg 450 455 460Gly Val Lys Gly Val Ser His Ala Asp Glu Leu Thr Tyr Phe Phe Trp465 470 475 480Asn Gln Leu Ala Lys Arg Met Pro Lys Glu Ser Arg Glu Tyr Lys Thr 485 490 495Ile Glu Arg Met Thr Gly Ile Trp Ile Gln Phe Ala Thr Thr Gly Asn 500 505 510Pro Tyr Ser Asn Glu Ile Glu Gly Met Glu Asn Val Ser Trp Asp Pro 515 520 525Ile Lys Lys Ser Asp Glu Val Tyr Lys Cys Leu Asn Ile Ser Asp Glu 530 535 540Leu Lys Met Ile Asp Val Pro Glu Met Asp Lys Ile Lys Gln Trp Glu545 550 555 560Ser Met Phe Glu Lys His Arg Asp Leu Phe 565 570 7 1713 DNA Lucilia cuprina 7atgaatttca acgttagttt gatggagaaa ttaaaatgga agattaaatg cattgaaaat 60aagtttttaa actatcgttt aactaccaat gaaacggtgg tagctgaaac tgaatatggc 120aaagtgaaag gcgttaaacg tttaactgtg tacgatgatt cctactacag ttttgagggt 180ataccgtacg cccaaccgcc agtgggtgag ctgagattta aagcacccca gcgaccaaca 240ccctgggatg gtgtgcgtga ttgttgcaat cataaagata agtcagtgca agttgatttt 300ataacgggca aagtgtgtgg ctcagaggat tgtctatacc taagtgtcta tacgaataat 360ctaaatcccg aaactaaacg tcccgtttta gtatacatac atggtggtgg ttttattatc 420ggtgaaaatc atcgtgatat gtatggtcct gattatttca ttaaaaagga tgtggtgttg 480attaacatac aatatcgttt gggagctcta ggttttctaa gtttaaattc agaagacctt 540aatgtgcccg gtaatgccgg ccttaaagat caagtcatgg ccttgcgttg gattaaaaat 600aattgcgcca actttggtgg caatcccgat aatattacag tctttggtga aagtgccggt 660gctgcctcta cccactacat gatgttaacc gaacaaactc gcggtctttt ccatcgtggt 720atactaatgt cgggtaatgc tatttgtcca tgggctaata cccaatgtca acatcgtgcc 780ttcaccttag ccaaattggc cggctataag ggtgaggata atgataagga tgttttggaa 840tttcttatga aagccaagcc acaggattta ataaaacttg aggaaaaagt tttaactcta 900gaagagcgta caaataaggt catgtttcct tttggtccca ctgttgagcc atatcagacc 960gctgattgtg tcttacccaa acatcctcgg gaaatggtta aaactgcttg gggtaattcg 1020atacccacta tgatgggtaa cacttcatat gagggtctat ttttcacttc aattcttaag 1080caaatgccta tgcttgttaa ggaattggaa acttgtgtca attttgtgcc aagtgaattg 1140gctgatgctg aacgcaccgc cccagagacc ttggaaatgg gtgctaaaat taaaaaggct 1200catgttacag gagaaacacc aacagctgat aattttatgg atctttgctc tcacatctat 1260ttctggttcc ccatgcatcg tttgttgcaa ttacgtttca atcacacctc cggtacaccc 1320gtctacttgt atcgcttcga ctttgattcg gaagatctta ttaatcccta tcgtattatg 1380cgtagtggac gtggtgttaa gggtgttagt catgctgatg aattaaccta tttcttctgg 1440aatcaattgg ccaaacgtat gcctaaagaa tcgcgtgaat acaaaacaat tgaacgtatg 1500actggtatat ggatacaatt tgccaccact ggtaatcctt atagcaatga aattgaaggt 1560atggaaaatg tttcctggga tccaattaag aaatccgacg aagtatacaa gtgtttgaat 1620attagtgacg aattgaaaat gattgatgtg cctgaaatgg ataagattaa acaatgggaa 1680tcgatgtttg aaaaacatag agatttattt tag 1713 8 570 PRT Lucilia cuprina 8Met Asn Phe Asn Val Ser Leu Met Glu Lys Leu Lys Trp Lys Ile Lys 1 5 10 15Cys Ile Glu Asn Lys Phe Leu Asn Tyr Arg Leu Thr Thr Asn Glu Thr 20 25 30Val Val Ala Glu Thr Glu Tyr Gly Lys Val Lys Gly Val Lys Arg Leu 35 40 45Thr Val Tyr Asp Asp Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Phe Glu Gly Ile Pro Tyr Ala 50 55 60Gln Pro Pro Val Gly Glu Leu Arg Phe Lys Ala Pro Gln Arg Pro Thr 65 70 75 80Pro Trp Asp Gly Val Arg Asp Cys Cys Asn His Lys Asp Lys Ser Val 85 90 95Gln Val Asp Phe Ile Thr Gly Lys Val Cys Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 100 105 110Tyr Leu Ser Val Tyr Thr Asn Asn Leu Asn Pro Glu Thr Lys Arg Pro 115 120 125Val Leu Val Tyr Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Ile Gly Glu Asn His 130 135 140Arg Asp Met Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Ile Lys Lys Asp Val Val Leu145 150 155 160Ile Asn Ile Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Ala Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Asn 165 170 175Ser Glu Asp Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 180 185 190Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Ile Lys Asn Asn Cys Ala Asn Phe Gly Gly Asn 195 200 205Pro Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Ala Ala Ser Thr 210 215 220His Tyr Met Met Leu Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly225 230 235 240Ile Leu Met Ser Gly Asn Ala Ile Cys Pro Trp Ala Asn Thr Gln Cys 245 250 255Gln His Arg Ala Phe Thr Leu Ala Lys Leu Ala Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 260 265 270Asp Asn Asp Lys Asp Val Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Lys Pro Gln 275 280 285Asp Leu Ile Lys Leu Glu Glu Lys Val Leu Thr Leu Glu Glu Arg Thr 290 295 300Asn Lys Val Met Phe Pro Phe Gly Pro Thr Val Glu Pro Tyr Gln Thr305 310 315 320Ala Asp Cys Val Leu Pro Lys His Pro Arg Glu Met Val Lys Thr Ala 325 330 335Trp Gly Asn Ser Ile Pro Thr Met Met Gly Asn Thr Ser Tyr Glu Gly 340 345 350Leu Phe Phe Thr Ser Ile Leu Lys Gln Met Pro Met Leu Val Lys Glu 355 360 365Leu Glu Thr Cys Val Asn Phe Val Pro Ser Glu Leu Ala Asp Ala Glu 370 375 380Arg Thr Ala Pro Glu Thr Leu Glu Met Gly Ala Lys Ile Lys Lys Ala385 390 395 400His Val Thr Gly Glu Thr Pro Thr Ala Asp Asn Phe Met Asp Leu Cys 405 410 415Ser His Ile Tyr Phe Trp Phe Pro Met His Arg Leu Leu Gln Leu Arg 420 425 430Phe Asn His Thr Ser Gly Thr Pro Val Tyr Leu Tyr Arg Phe Asp Phe 435 440 445Asp Ser Glu Asp Leu Ile Asn Pro Tyr Arg Ile Met Arg Ser Gly Arg 450 455 460Gly Val Lys Gly Val Ser His Ala Asp Glu Leu Thr Tyr Phe Phe Trp465 470 475 480Asn Gln Leu Ala Lys Arg Met Pro Lys Glu Ser Arg Glu Tyr Lys Thr 485 490 495Ile Glu Arg Met Thr Gly Ile Trp Ile Gln Phe Ala Thr Thr Gly Asn 500 505 510Pro Tyr Ser Asn Glu Ile Glu Gly Met Glu Asn Val Ser Trp Asp Pro 515 520 525Ile Lys Lys Ser Asp Glu Val Tyr Lys Cys Leu Asn Ile Ser Asp Glu 530 535 540Leu Lys Met Ile Asp Val Pro Glu Met Asp Lys Ile Lys Gln Trp Glu545 550 555 560Ser Met Phe Glu Lys His Arg Asp Leu Phe 565 570 9 1713 DNA Lucilia cuprina 9atgaatttca acgttagttt gatggagaaa ttaaaatgga agattaaatg cattgaaaat 60aagtttttaa actatcgttt aactaccaat gaaacggtgg tagctgaaac tgaatatggc 120aaagtgaaag gcgttaaacg tttaactgtg tacgatgatt cctactacag ttttgagggt 180ataccgtacg cccaaccgcc agtgggtgag ctgagattta aagcacccca gcgaccaaca 240ccctgggatg gtgtgcgtga ttgttgcaat cataaagata agtcagtgca agttgatttt 300ataacgggca aagtgtgtgg ctcagaggat tgtctatacc taagtgtcta tacgaataat 360ctaaatcccg aaactaaacg tcccgtttta gtatacatac atggtggtgg ttttattatc 420ggtgaaaatc atcgtgatat gtatggtcct gattatttca ttaaaaagga tgtggtgttg 480attaacatac aatatcgttt gggagctcta ggttttctaa gtttaaattc agaagacctt 540aatgtgcccg gtaatgccgg ccttaaagat caagtcatgg ccttgcgttg gattaaaaat 600aattgcgcca actttggtgg caatcccgat aatattacag tctttggtga aagtgccggt 660gctgcctcta cccactacat gatgttaacc gaacaaactc gcggtctttt ccatcgtggt 720atactaatgt cgggtaatgc tatttgtcca ttggctaata cccaatgtca acatcgtgcc 780ttcaccttag ccaaattggc cggctataag ggtgaggata atgataagga tgttttggaa 840tttcttatga aagccaagcc acaggattta ataaaacttg aggaaaaagt tttaactcta 900gaagagcgta caaataaggt catgtttcct tttggtccca ctgttgagcc atatcagacc 960gctgattgtg tcttacccaa acatcctcgg gaaatggtta aaactgcttg gggtaattcg 1020atacccacta tgatgggtaa cacttcatat gagggtctat ttttcacttc aattcttaag 1080caaatgccta tgcttgttaa ggaattggaa acttgtgtca attttgtgcc aagtgaattg 1140gctgatgctg aacgcaccgc cccagagacc ttggaaatgg gtgctaaaat taaaaaggct 1200catgttacag gagaaacacc aacagctgat aattttatgg atctttgctc tcacatctat 1260ttctggttcc ccatgcatcg tttgttgcaa ttacgtttca atcacacctc cggtacaccc 1320gtctacttgt atcgcttcga cttcgattcg gaagatctta tcaatcccta tcgtattatg 1380cgtagtggac gtggtgttaa gggtgttagt catgctgatg aattaaccta tttcttctgg 1440aatcaattgg ccaaacgtat gcctaaagaa tcgcgtgaat acaaaacaat tgaacgtatg 1500actggtatat ggatacaatt tgccaccact ggtaatcctt atagcaatga aattgaaggt 1560atggaaaatg tttcctggga tccaattaag aaatccgatg aagtatacaa gtgtttgaat 1620attagtgatg aattgaaaat gattgatgtg cctgaaatgg ataagattaa acaatgggag 1680tcgatgtttg aaaaacatag agatttattt tag 1713 10 570 PRT Lucilia cuprina 10Met Asn Phe Asn Val Ser Leu Met Glu Lys Leu Lys Trp Lys Ile Lys 1 5 10 15Cys Ile Glu Asn Lys Phe Leu Asn Tyr Arg Leu Thr Thr Asn Glu Thr 20 25 30Val Val Ala Glu Thr Glu Tyr Gly Lys Val Lys Gly Val Lys Arg Leu 35 40 45Thr Val Tyr Asp Asp Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Phe Glu Gly Ile Pro Tyr Ala 50 55 60Gln Pro Pro Val Gly Glu Leu Arg Phe Lys Ala Pro Gln Arg Pro Thr 65 70 75 80Pro Trp Asp Gly Val Arg Asp Cys Cys Asn His Lys Asp Lys Ser Val 85 90 95Gln Val Asp Phe Ile Thr Gly Lys Val Cys Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 100 105 110Tyr Leu Ser Val Tyr Thr Asn Asn Leu Asn Pro Glu Thr Lys Arg Pro 115 120 125Val Leu Val Tyr Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Ile Gly Glu Asn His 130 135 140Arg Asp Met Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Ile Lys Lys Asp Val Val Leu145 150 155 160Ile Asn Ile Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Ala Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Asn 165 170 175Ser Glu Asp Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 180 185 190Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Ile Lys Asn Asn Cys Ala Asn Phe Gly Gly Asn 195 200 205Pro Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Ala Ala Ser Thr 210 215 220His Tyr Met Met Leu Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly225 230 235 240Ile Leu Met Ser Gly Asn Ala Ile Cys Pro Leu Ala Asn Thr Gln Cys 245 250 255Gln His Arg Ala Phe Thr Leu Ala Lys Leu Ala Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 260 265 270Asp Asn Asp Lys Asp Val Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Lys Pro Gln 275 280 285Asp Leu Ile Lys Leu Glu Glu Lys Val Leu Thr Leu Glu Glu Arg Thr 290 295 300Asn Lys Val Met Phe Pro Phe Gly Pro Thr Val Glu Pro Tyr Gln Thr305 310 315 320Ala Asp Cys Val Leu Pro Lys His Pro Arg Glu Met Val Lys Thr Ala 325 330 335Trp Gly Asn Ser Ile Pro Thr Met Met Gly Asn Thr Ser Tyr Glu Gly 340 345 350Leu Phe Phe Thr Ser Ile Leu Lys Gln Met Pro Met Leu Val Lys Glu 355 360 365Leu Glu Thr Cys Val Asn Phe Val Pro Ser Glu Leu Ala Asp Ala Glu 370 375 380Arg Thr Ala Pro Glu Thr Leu Glu Met Gly Ala Lys Ile Lys Lys Ala385 390 395 400His Val Thr Gly Glu Thr Pro Thr Ala Asp Asn Phe Met Asp Leu Cys 405 410 415Ser His Ile Tyr Phe Trp Phe Pro Met His Arg Leu Leu Gln Leu Arg 420 425 430Phe Asn His Thr Ser Gly Thr Pro Val Tyr Leu Tyr Arg Phe Asp Phe 435 440 445Asp Ser Glu Asp Leu Ile Asn Pro Tyr Arg Ile Met Arg Ser Gly Arg 450 455 460Gly Val Lys Gly Val Ser His Ala Asp Glu Leu Thr Tyr Phe Phe Trp465 470 475 480Asn Gln Leu Ala Lys Arg Met Pro Lys Glu Ser Arg Glu Tyr Lys Thr 485 490 495Ile Glu Arg Met Thr Gly Ile Trp Ile Gln Phe Ala Thr Thr Gly Asn 500 505 510Pro Tyr Ser Asn Glu Ile Glu Gly Met Glu Asn Val Ser Trp Asp Pro 515 520 525Ile Lys Lys Ser Asp Glu Val Tyr Lys Cys Leu Asn Ile Ser Asp Glu 530 535 540Leu Lys Met Ile Asp Val Pro Glu Met Asp Lys Ile Lys Gln Trp Glu545 550 555 560Ser Met Phe Glu Lys His Arg Asp Leu Phe 565 570 11 26 DNA Lucilia cuprina 11atgaatttca acgttagttt gatgga 26 12 28 DNA Lucilia cuprina 12ctaaaataaa tctctatgtt tttcaaac 28 13 570 PRT Musca domestica 13Met Thr Phe Leu Lys Gln Phe Ile Phe Arg Leu Lys Leu Cys Val Lys 1 5 10 15Cys Met Val Asn Lys Tyr Thr Asn Tyr Arg Leu Ser Thr Asn Glu Thr 20 25 30Gln Ile Ile Asp Thr Glu Tyr Gly Gln Ile Lys Gly Val Lys Arg Met 35 40 45Thr Val Tyr Asp Asp Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Phe Glu Ser Ile Pro Tyr Ala 50 55 60Lys Pro Pro Val Gly Glu Leu Arg Phe Lys Ala Pro Gln Arg Pro Val 65 70 75 80Pro Trp Glu Gly Val Arg Asp Cys Cys Gly Pro Ala Asn Arg Ser Val 85 90 95Gln Thr Asp Phe Ile Ser Gly Lys Pro Thr Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 100 105 110Tyr Leu Asn Val Tyr Thr Asn Asp Leu Asn Pro Asp Lys Arg Arg Pro 115 120 125Val Met Val Phe Ile His Gly Gly Asp Phe Ile Phe Gly Glu Ala Asn 130 135 140Arg Asn Trp Phe Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Met Lys Lys Pro Val Val Leu145 150 155 160Val Thr Val Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Val Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Lys 165 170 175Ser Glu Asn Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 180 185 190Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Val Lys Ser Asn Ile Ala Ile Phe Gly Gly Asp 195 200 205Val Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Gly Ala Ser Thr 210 215 220His Tyr Met Met Ile Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly225 230 235 240Ile Met Met Ser Gly Asn Ser Met Cys Ser Trp Ala Ser Thr Glu Cys 245 250 255Gln Ser Arg Ala Leu Thr Met Ala Lys Arg Val Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 260 265 270Asp Asn Glu Lys Asp Ile Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Asn Pro Tyr 275 280 285Asp Leu Ile Lys Glu Glu Pro Gln Val Leu Thr Pro Glu Arg Met Gln 290 295 300Asn Lys Val Met Phe Pro Phe Gly Pro Thr Val Glu Pro Tyr Gln Thr305 310 315 320Ala Asp Cys Val Val Pro Lys Pro Ile Arg Glu Met Val Lys Ser Ala 325 330 335Trp Gly Asn Ser Ile Pro Thr Leu Ile Gly Asn Thr Ser Tyr Glu Gly 340 345 350Leu Leu Ser Lys Ser Val Ala Lys Gln Tyr Pro Glu Val Val Lys Glu 355 360 365Leu Glu Ser Cys Val Asn Tyr Val Pro Trp Glu Leu Ala Asp Ser Glu 370 375 380Arg Ser Ala Pro Glu Thr Leu Glu Arg Ala Ala Ile Val Lys Lys Ala385 390 395 400His Val Asp Gly Glu Thr Pro Thr Leu Asp Asn Phe Met Glu Leu Cys 405 410 415Ser Tyr Phe Tyr Phe Leu Phe Pro Met His Arg Phe Leu Gln Leu Arg 420 425 430Phe Asn His Thr Ala Gly Thr Pro Ile Tyr Leu Tyr Arg Phe Asp Phe 435 440 445Asp Ser Glu Glu Ile Ile Asn Pro Tyr Arg Ile Met Arg Phe Gly Arg 450 455 460Gly Val Lys Gly Val Ser His Ala Asp Glu Leu Thr Tyr Leu Phe Trp465 470 475 480Asn Ile Leu Ser Lys Arg Leu Pro Lys Glu Ser Arg Glu Tyr Lys Thr 485 490 495Ile Glu Arg Met Val Gly Ile Trp Thr Glu Phe Ala Thr Thr Gly Lys 500 505 510Pro Tyr Ser Asn Asp Ile Ala Gly Met Glu Asn Leu Thr Trp Asp Pro 515 520 525Ile Lys Lys Ser Asp Asp Val Tyr Lys Cys Leu Asn Ile Gly Asp Glu 530 535 540Leu Lys Val Met Asp Leu Pro Glu Met Asp Lys Ile Lys Gln Gly Ala545 550 555 560Ser Ile Phe Asp Lys Lys Lys Glu Leu Phe 565 570 14 1710 DNA Musca domestica 14atgacttttc tgaagcaatt catatttcgc ctgaaactat gctttaaatg catggtcaat 60aaatacacaa actaccgtct gagtacaaat gaaacccaaa taatcgatac tgaatatgga 120caaattaagg gtgttaagcg aatgaccgtc tacgatgatt cttactacag tttcgagagt 180ataccctatg ctaagcctcc agtgggtgag ttgagattca aggcacccca gcggcctgta 240ccatgggagg gtgtacgtga ttgctgtggg ccagccaaca gatcggtaca gacagatttc 300ataagtggca aacccacagg ttcggaggat tgtctatacc tgaatgtgta taccaatgac 360ttgaacccag acaaaaggcg tcctgttatg gttttcatcc atggcggaga ttttattttc 420ggcgaagcaa atcgtaactg gtttggtccc gactacttta tgaagaaacc cgtggtcttg 480gtaaccgtgc aatatcgttt gggtgtgttg ggtttcctta gcctgaaatc ggaaaatctc 540aatgtccccg gcaacgctgg cctcaaggat caagtaatgg ccttgagatg ggtcaagagt 600aatattgcca ttttcggtgg cgatgtagac aatattaccg tcttcggcga aagtgctggt 660ggggcctcaa cccattacat gatgataacc gaacagaccc gtggtttatt ccatcgtggt 720atcatgatgt ccggtaattc catgtgctca tgggcctcta cagaatgcca aagtcgtgcg 780ctcaccatgg ccaaacgtgt tggctataag ggagaggaca atgaaaaaga tatcctggaa 840ttcctaatga aagccaatcc ctatgatttg atcaaagagg agccacaagt tttgacaccc 900gaaagaatgc aaaataaggt catgtttcct tttggaccca ctgtagaacc ataccagaca 960gccgactgtg tggtacccaa accaatcaga gaaatggtga agagcgcctg gggaaattcg 1020atacccacat tgataggcaa tacctcctac gaaggtttgc tttccaaatc aattgccaaa 1080caatatccgg aggttgtaaa agagttggaa tcctgtgtga attatgtgcc ttgggagttg 1140gctgacagtg aacgcagtgc cccggaaacc ctggagaggg ctgccattgt gaaaaaggcc 1200catgtggatg gggaaacacc tactctggat aattttatgg agctttgctc ctatttctat 1260ttcctcttcc ccatgcatcg cttcctacaa ttgcgcttca accacacagc tggcactccc 1320atttatttgt atcgtttcga tttcgattcc gaagaaatta ttaaccccta tcgtattatg 1380cgttttggcc gtggcgttaa aggtgtaagc catgccgatg agctaaccta tctcttctgg 1440aacattttgt cgaaacgcct gccaaaggaa agccgcgaat acaaaaccat tgaacgcatg 1500gttggcattt ggacggaatt cgccaccacc ggcaaaccat acagcaatga tatagccggc 1560atggaaaacc tcacctggga tcccataaaa aaatccgatg atgtctataa atgtttaaat 1620atcggcgatg aattgaaagt tatggatttg ccagaaatgg ataaaattaa acaatgggca 1680agtatattcg ataaaaagaa ggaattgttt 1710 15 207 PRT Musca domestica 15Gln Thr Asp Phe Ile Ser Gly Lys Pro Thr Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 1 5 10 15Tyr Leu Asn Val Tyr Thr Asn Asp Leu Asn Pro Asp Lys Lys Arg Pro 20 25 30Val Met Val Phe Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Phe Gly Glu Ala Asn 35 40 45Arg Asn Trp Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Met Lys Lys Pro Val Val Leu 50 55 60Val Thr Val Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Val Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Lys 65 70 75 80Ser Glu Asn Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 85 90 95Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Phe Lys Ser Asn Ile Ala Ile Phe Gly Gly Asp 100 105 110Val Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Gly Ala Ser Thr 115 120 125His Tyr Met Met Ile Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly 130 135 140Ile Met Met Ser Gly Asn Ser Met Cys Ser Ser Ala Ser Thr Glu Cys145 150 155 160Gln Ser Arg Ala Leu Thr Met Ala Lys Arg Val Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 165 170 175Glu Asn Glu Lys Asp Ile Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Asn Pro Tyr 180 185 190Asp Leu Ile Lys Glu Glu Pro Gln Val Leu Thr Pro Glu Arg Met 195 200 205 16 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 16ggatggtgtg cgtgattgtt g 21 17 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 17aaaaggatgt ggtgttgatt a 21 18 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 18actaatgtcg ggtaatgcta t 21 19 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 19cactatgatg ggtaacactt c 21 20 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 20tgttacagga gaaacaccaa c 21 21 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 21agaatcgcgt gaatacaaaa c 21 22 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 22acggtatacc ctcaaaactg t 21 23 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 23tcccaaacga tattgtatgt t 21 24 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 24acatcatgta gtgggtagaa g 21 25 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 25ccgaggatgt ttgggtaaga c 21 26 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 26tatcagctgt tggtgtttct c 21 27 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 27acgcgattct ttaggcatac g 21 28 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 28tgctgcctct acccactaca t 21 29 21 DNA Lucilia cuprina 29cctgtggctt ggctttcata a 21 30 35 DNA Artificial Sequence Description of Artificial Sequence Degenerate Primer 30ttcgagggna tnccntaygc nmarccnccn btngg 35 31 32 DNA Artificial Sequence Description of Artificial Sequence Degenerate Primer 31acytgrtcyt tnarnccngc rttnccnggn ac 32 32 22 DNA Musca domestica 32tttggtcccg actactttat ga 22 33 24 DNA Musca domestica 33tgccacttat gaaatctgtc tgta 24 34 24 DNA Musca domestica 34tacatgatga taaccgaaca gacc 24 35 23 DNA Musca domestica 35tcgattattt gggtttcatt tgt 23 36 21 DNA Musca domestica 36acagacagat ttcataagtg g 21 37 21 DNA Musca domestica 37tttgcattct ttcgggtgtc a 21 38 21 DNA Musca domestica 38attcgatacc cacattgata g 21 39 21 DNA Musca domestica 39ggcactccca tttatttgta t 21 40 23 DNA Musca domestica 40atgacttttc tgaagcaatt cat 23 41 23 DNA Musca domestica 41aaacaattcc ttctttttat cga 23 42 21 DNA Musca domestica 42ggcatggaaa acctcacctg g 21 43 207 PRT Lucilia cuprina 43Gln Val Asp Phe Ile Thr Gly Lys Val Cys Gly Ser Glu Asp Cys Leu 1 5 10 15Tyr Leu Ser Val Tyr Thr Asn Asn Leu Asn Pro Glu Thr Lys Arg Pro 20 25 30Val Leu Val Tyr Ile His Gly Gly Gly Phe Ile Ile Gly Glu Asn His 35 40 45Arg Asp Met Tyr Gly Pro Asp Tyr Phe Ile Lys Lys Asp Val Val Leu 50 55 60Ile Asn Ile Gln Tyr Arg Leu Gly Ala Leu Gly Phe Leu Ser Leu Asn 65 70 75 80Ser Glu Asp Leu Asn Val Pro Gly Asn Ala Gly Leu Lys Asp Gln Val 85 90 95Met Ala Leu Arg Trp Ile Lys Asn Asn Cys Ala Asn Phe Gly Gly Asn 100 105 110Pro Asp Asn Ile Thr Val Phe Gly Glu Ser Ala Gly Ala Ala Ser Thr 115 120 125His Tyr Met Met Leu Thr Glu Gln Thr Arg Gly Leu Phe His Arg Gly 130 135 140Ile Leu Met Ser Gly Asn Ala Ile Cys Pro Leu Ala Asn Thr Gln Cys145 150 155 160Gln His Arg Ala Phe Thr Leu Ala Lys Leu Ala Gly Tyr Lys Gly Glu 165 170 175Asp Asn Asp Lys Asp Val Leu Glu Phe Leu Met Lys Ala Lys Pro Gln 180 185 190Asp Leu Ile Lys Leu Glu Glu Lys Val Leu Thr Leu Glu Glu Arg 195 200 205

Claims

1. An isolated DNA molecule encoding an enzyme capable of hydrolyzing at least one organophosphate selected from the group consisting of carboxylester organophosphates and dimethyl-oxon organophosphates, the DNA molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence having at least 60% homology with LcαE7 (SEQ ID NO:7), in which the protein encoded by the DNA molecule differs from E3 (SEQ ID NO:8) at least in the substitution of Trp at position 251 with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of Leu, Ser, Ala, Ile, Val, Thr, Cys, Met and Gly.

2. An isolated DNA molecule as claimed in claim 1 in which the DNA molecule has at least 80% homology with the DNA encoding E3 (SEQ ID NO:8).

3. An isolated DNA molecule as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 in which the DNA molecule has at least 95% homology with the DNA encoding E3 (SEQ ID NO:8).

4. An isolated DNA molecule as claimed in claim 1 in which the isolated DNA molecule has the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NOS:1, 3 or 5, or a sequence which hybridizes thereto with the proviso that the protein encoded by the DNA molecule differs from E3 (SEQ ID NO:8) at least in the substitution of Trp at position 251 with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of Leu, Ser, Ala, Ile, Val, Thr, Cys, Met and Gly.

5. An isolated DNA molecule as claimed in claim 1 in which the Trp at position 251 is substituted with Leu or Ser.

6. An isolated DNA molecule, the DNA molecule encoding a polypeptide having the amino acid sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO:9 RM-8Con or the amino acid sequence of MdαE7 SEQ ID NO:13 in which Trp at position 251 is replaced with Ser.

7. A transformed cell which expresses an enzyme capable of hydrolyzing at least one organophosphate selected from the group consisting of carboxylester organophosphates and dimethyl-oxon organophosphates, in which the cell is transformed with a DNA molecule as claimed in claim 1.

8. A transformed cell as claimed in claim 7 in which the cell is a prokaryotic cell or an insect cell.

9. A method of producing an enzyme capable of hydrolyzing at least one organophosphate selected from the group consisting of carboxylester organophosphates and dimethyl-oxon organophosphates, or an enzymatically active portion thereof, the method comprising transforming a host cell with the DNA molecule as claimed in claim 1 operatively linked to a control sequence, culturing the transformed cell under conditions which allow expression of the DNA sequence and recovering the produced enzyme, or enzymatically active portion thereof.