TREA

Malleable prosthesis with enhanced concealability

Follow

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8911350
  • Patent Number
    8,911,350
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 23, 2008
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 16, 2014
    9 years ago
  • CPC
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • 623 011110
    • 623 01319-0132
    • 600 038-041
    • 174 1060R0
    • 602 005-011
    • 602 018000
    • 602 020000
    • 602 022000
    • 602 023000
    • CPC
    • A61H19/44
    • A61H19/40
    • A61F2/26
    • A61F5/41
    • A61F2005/411
    • A61F2005/412
    • A61F2005/414
    • A61F2005/415
    • A61F2005/417
    • A61F2005/418
  • International Classifications
    • A61F5/00
    • A61F2/02
    • A61F2/26
    • Term Extension
      735
Information
Abstract
A penile prosthetic device comprising a column formed of resilient material. The prosthetic device comprises multiple malleable cores arranged inside the column. The multiple malleable cores are spaced apart from one another.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to implantable prosthetic devices. In particular, but not by way of limitation, the invention relates to implantable malleable (non-inflatable) penile prostheses.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There are many causes of male impotence including those that are psychologically based as well as trauma related impotence. Procedures have been developed for treating impotence, and one such procedure involves the implantation of a penile prosthesis. There are two general types of penile implants, namely, the inflatable penile implant and the noninflatable penile implant. The noninflatable implants include those which incorporate a rigid rod and are permanently stiff and those formed of malleable or bendable materials and which may be bent between the erect and nonerect positions. U.S. Pat. No. 3,893,456 discloses a rigid rod type of penile prosthesis. Examples of malleable implants are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,987,789 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,151,841. One of the problems involved in malleable penile implants is the difficulty in concealing the device by positioning the rods in a bent configuration and remaining in that concealed position. This difficulty is often due to the large diameter of the rod. This difficulty is addressed by the malleable rod of the present invention wherein changes in the configuration of the rod provides greater positionability and concealability.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed is a prosthetic device. The prosthetic device comprises a column formed of resilient material. The prosthetic device comprises multiple malleable cores arranged inside the column. The multiple malleable cores are spaced apart from one another.


In one embodiment, the multiple malleable cores are spaced apart from a central axis of the column and are positioned adjacent an outer diameter of the column.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate a prosthetic device.



FIGS. 3-8 illustrate bundles of wires in columns of resilient material.



FIGS. 9-11 illustrate examples of wire cross sections.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 illustrates a prosthetic device 100, and FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view (along line 2-2 in FIG. 1) of the prosthetic device 100. The prosthetic device 100 comprises a column 102 formed of resilient material. The resilient material can comprise silicone or other known biocompatible resilient prosthesis material. The prosthetic device 100 comprises multiple malleable cores 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116118 arranged inside the column 102. The multiple malleable cores 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118 are spaced apart from one another, spaced apart from a central axis 120, and positioned adjacent an outer diameter of the column 102. In one embodiment, the multiple malleable cores 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118 are positioned in a circular pattern at equally spaced intervals as illustrated. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1-2, eight malleable cores are illustrated, however, other numbers of cores in a range of 3 to 9 cores are also contemplated. Each of the multiple malleable cores 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116118 comprises a bundle of wires as illustrated in FIGS. 3-11. In one embodiment, the wires comprise metal alloy wires formed of a malleable material. The wires can be round wires, as illustrated in FIGS. 5-7, or the wires can have an approximately hexagonal cross section (FIG. 8), fitting together with one another to substantially eliminate void spaces between wires in the bundles. Other cross-sectional shapes of wires that reduce voids between wires, including triangles (1002 in FIG. 10) and squares (1102 in FIG. 11), are also contemplated. Combinations of smaller wires fitting into voids between larger wires (902 in FIG. 9) are also contemplated. Stainless steel or other known biocompatible metal alloy wires can be used. Individual wires, or wire bundles, can be covered with braided yarn, Teflon tubing or other jacketing material to enhance mechanical characteristics.


In one embodiment, the column 102 has a central hollow core (not illustrated) that is free of elastomer. The central hollow core reduces springback. The term “springback” refers to the amount of a return movement of a bent column after a bending force is removed. Springback causes a column that is bent into a position (either a straight or bent position) to lose part of the bend after the column is released. Springback is an undesirable property that adversely affects concealability. Springback requires the user to learn to bend the column past a desired position in order for it to have the desired position after springback, or requires the user to bend the column multiple times in order to obtain a concealed position. Springback is believed to be due to the shape and elastic recovery properties of materials in the column 102, and is reduced by providing the hollow core.


As illustrated in FIG. 3, a column 302 of resilient material can be cast, molded, drilled or otherwise shaped to have multiple hollow cavities 306 into which are later inserted bundles 304 of malleable wires. In one process, the resilient material is cooled to a low enough temperature to reduce resiliency and permit drilling of the material.


As illustrated in an embodiment shown in FIGS. 4 and 7, a column 702 of resilient material can fill intermediate spaces between wires 704, 706, 708, 710, 712, 714, 716 in a bundle 718. In one manufacturing process, resilient material is injected into a mold from which air has been evacuated so that the resilient material easily flows into and substantially fills intermediate spaces between the wires 704, 706, 708, 710, 712, 714, 716 in the bundle 718 as illustrated in FIG. 7.


As illustrated in FIG. 5, a column of resilient material 502 is applied around a jacket 504. The jacket 504 surrounds a bundle 506 of malleable wires. In one embodiment, the jacket 504 comprises plastic resin tubing. In another embodiment, the jacket 504 comprises heat shrink tubing. In one process, the jacket 504 resists flow of the liquid resilient material into the bundle 506 during curing. In one embodiment the jacket 504 functions as a slip surface that reduces drag on the bundle 506 as it bends.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, a column 602 of resilient material is applied around a bundle of wires 602, 604, 606, 608, 610, 612, 614, 616, leaving void spaces (such as void space 618) between wires in the bundle that are not filled with resilient material. In one process, the void spaces are left filled with trapped air or inert gas while the column of material 602 is introduced in a viscous liquid state and then cures into a resilient state around the outside of the bundle of wires.


The penile prostheses disclosed in FIGS. 1-11 are more easily concealed and have improved rigidity (resisting buckling of the column) relative to comparable existing devices. Bending rigidity refers to the ability of a column in a straight position to remain in a straight position when subjected to radial deflection forces (bending forces) encountered during intromission. The prostheses have a desired high level of rigidity to resist bending forces in a range of smaller bending forces encountered during intromission, but also respond by bending when subjected to a range of higher bending forces encountered when the user is intentionally bending the prosthesis. The penile prostheses disclosed in FIGS. 1-11 have improved axial rigidity, in other words, resistance to buckling when a compressive load force is applied that is aligned with the axis of the prosthesis.


The malleable type penile prosthesis includes a core of multiple bundles of malleable stainless steel wire. The bundles are generally aligned with the prosthesis major axis but, instead of being in the center of the prosthesis, they are positioned radially displaced from the center, and are arranged proximate to a lengthwise side of the prosthesis. Each of the bundles comprises strands of wire wrapped around each other. A relatively small number of wires is used in each bundle. Each bundle typically includes a smaller number of wires than would be found in an axial bundle of a conventional prosthesis, and the enhanced malleability feature of the prosthesis is derived from smaller contributions of malleability from each of the bundles with smaller numbers of wires per bundle.


In one embodiment, the individual wires in the bundles are individually encased in silicone elastomer. In another embodiment, each bundle of wires is covered by a sleeve so that there is little or no elastomer in the spaces between wires in a bundle. Another variation would have no elastomer inside, just a sleeve covering the device with the wire bundles loose inside. In yet another embodiment, the wire bundles are inserted into cavities or pockets of a previously cured elastomer body, so that the bundles are free to move in the pockets, unrestrained by bonding to the elastomer body.


The outer configuration of the prosthesis can be the same as the outer configuration of conventional malleable prostheses, and known methods of implantation can be used. The wire bundles are spaced radially from the prosthesis center axis, and this outward position imparts to the prosthesis a greater resistance to bending when subjected to an externally applied turning moment (torque). The prosthesis is less susceptible to undesired bending when exposed to inadvertent low level turning moments. Because the individual bundles consist of fewer strands of wire, the bundles are more malleable and have reduced springback (elastic recovery) when the prosthesis is bent for concealment. The lower springback means the prosthesis maintains its bend and provides enhanced concealability relative to conventional prostheses.


Also contemplated is an embodiment without silicone elastomer in the center or adjacent the wire bundles. Such an embodiment would springback less when bent because there is less elastomer to provide the force to spring back, and the wire bundles would be free to bend with a larger radius, which larger radius would inherently have lower springback force.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An implantable penile prosthetic device, comprising: a column formed of resilient material having proximal and distal ends, and a central axis extending from the proximal end to the distal end, the proximal and distal ends having exterior surfaces that extend across the central axis; andmultiple malleable cores arranged inside the column;wherein: each malleable core is entirely enclosed within the column and each malleable core comprises a bundle of wires;each malleable core is separated from neighboring malleable cores by gaps;the resilient material fills the gaps and extends between each of the malleable cores and the central axis such that each malleable core is displaced from the central axis;the prosthetic device is sized and shaped to be entirely implanted within a penis of a user; andthe prosthetic device is able to be bent by the user into multiple positions including a straight position, wherein the prosthetic device is sufficiently rigid to remain in the straight position during intromission, and is sufficiently malleable to maintain bent positions and not spring back to the straight position.
  • 2. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1 wherein the central axis of the column does not extend through a malleable core.
  • 3. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1 wherein the multiple malleable cores are positioned closer to an outer diameter of the column than the central axis.
  • 4. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1 wherein the multiple malleable cores are positioned in a circular pattern at equally spaced angular intervals relative to the central axis of the column.
  • 5. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1 wherein the multiple malleable cores comprise a number of cores in a range of 3 to 9 cores.
  • 6. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1 wherein each of the wires comprises a metal alloy wire formed of a malleable material.
  • 7. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 6 wherein the wires are round wires.
  • 8. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 6 wherein the wires have cross sections substantially reducing void spaces between wires in the bundles in comparison with void spaces present between equally sized round wires.
  • 9. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 6 wherein at least one malleable core comprises a sleeve surrounding the wires and separating the sides of the wires from the resilient material.
  • 10. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1 wherein the column has a central hollow core that is free of the resilient material.
  • 11. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 1, wherein each wire comprises a malleable material and jacketing material covering the malleable material.
  • 12. An implantable penile prosthetic device comprising: a column formed of resilient material having proximal and distal ends and a central axis extending from the proximal end to the distal end, the proximal and distal ends having exterior surfaces that extend across the central axis; anda plurality of malleable cores, each entirely enclosed within the column, each separated from neighboring malleable cores, and each having a longitudinal axis extending along the central axis;wherein:the resilient material fills space between each of the malleable cores and the central axis such that each malleable core is displaced from the central axis;the prosthetic device is sized and shaped to be entirely implanted within a penis of a user; andthe prosthetic device is able to be bent by the user into multiple positions including a straight position, wherein the prosthetic device is sufficiently rigid to remain in the straight position during intromission, and is sufficiently malleable to maintain bent positions and not spring back to the straight position.
  • 13. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 12, wherein each malleable core comprises a bundle of wires.
  • 14. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 13, wherein each malleable core comprises a jacket surrounding the bundle of wires.
  • 15. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 14, wherein the malleable cores are angularly displaced from each other relative to a central axis of the column within a plane extending perpendicularly to the central axis.
  • 16. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 15, wherein the malleable cores are arranged in a circular pattern around the central axis.
  • 17. An implantable penile prosthetic device comprising: a column formed of resilient material, the column having proximal and distal ends, a central axis extending from the proximal end to the distal end, and a central hollow core, the proximal and distal ends having exterior surfaces that extend across the central axis; anda plurality of malleable cores, each entirely enclosed within the column, each radially displaced from the central axis, and each angularly displaced from neighboring malleable cores relative to the central axis within a plane that is perpendicular to the central axis;wherein the central axis does not extend through a malleable core;the prosthetic device is sized and shaped to be entirely implanted within a penis of a user; andthe prosthetic device is able to be bent by the user into multiple positions including a straight position, wherein the prosthetic device is sufficiently rigid to remain in the straight position during intromission, and is sufficiently malleable to maintain bent positions and not spring back to the straight position.
  • 18. The implantable penile prosthetic device of claim 17, wherein each malleable core comprises a bundle of wires.
CLAIM TO PRIORITY

The present application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/981,844, filed Oct. 23, 2007, and entitled “Malleable Prosthesis with Multiple Malleable Cores Not On Center.” The identified provisional patent application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (161)
Number Name Date Kind
2268321 Flynn Dec 1941 A
3832996 Kalnberz Sep 1974 A
3853122 Strauch et al. Dec 1974 A
3893456 Small et al. Jul 1975 A
3954102 Buuck May 1976 A
3987789 Timm et al. Oct 1976 A
3991752 Gerow Nov 1976 A
4009711 Uson Mar 1977 A
4066073 Finney et al. Jan 1978 A
4151840 Barrington May 1979 A
4151841 Barrington May 1979 A
4177805 Tudoriu Dec 1979 A
4187839 Nuwayser et al. Feb 1980 A
4201202 Finney et al. May 1980 A
4204530 Finney May 1980 A
4222377 Burton Sep 1980 A
4224934 Scott et al. Sep 1980 A
4235227 Yamanaka Nov 1980 A
4244370 Furlow et al. Jan 1981 A
4267829 Burton et al. May 1981 A
4318396 Finney Mar 1982 A
4342308 Trick Aug 1982 A
4345339 Muller et al. Aug 1982 A
4353360 Finney et al. Oct 1982 A
4360010 Finney Nov 1982 A
4364379 Finney Dec 1982 A
4369771 Trick Jan 1983 A
4378792 Finney Apr 1983 A
4383525 Scott et al. May 1983 A
4392562 Burton et al. Jul 1983 A
4399811 Finney et al. Aug 1983 A
4399812 Whitehead Aug 1983 A
4404968 Evans, Sr. Sep 1983 A
4407278 Burton et al. Oct 1983 A
4411260 Koss Oct 1983 A
4411261 Finney Oct 1983 A
4412530 Burton Nov 1983 A
4424807 Evans, Sr. Jan 1984 A
4441491 Evans, Sr. Apr 1984 A
4449520 Palomar et al. May 1984 A
4457335 Trick Jul 1984 A
4483331 Trick Nov 1984 A
4517967 Timm et al. May 1985 A
4522198 Timm et al. Jun 1985 A
4523584 Yachia et al. Jun 1985 A
4532920 Finney Aug 1985 A
4541420 Timm et al. Sep 1985 A
4545081 Nestor et al. Oct 1985 A
4550719 Finney et al. Nov 1985 A
4550720 Trick Nov 1985 A
4558693 Lash et al. Dec 1985 A
4559931 Fischell Dec 1985 A
4566446 Fogarty Jan 1986 A
4572168 Fischell Feb 1986 A
4574792 Trick Mar 1986 A
4590927 Porter et al. May 1986 A
4594998 Porter et al. Jun 1986 A
4596242 Fischell Jun 1986 A
4602625 Yachia et al. Jul 1986 A
4604994 Sealfon Aug 1986 A
4611584 Finney Sep 1986 A
4619251 Helms et al. Oct 1986 A
4622958 Finney Nov 1986 A
4651721 Mikulich et al. Mar 1987 A
4653485 Fischell Mar 1987 A
4664100 Rudloff May 1987 A
4665902 Goff et al. May 1987 A
4665903 Whitehead May 1987 A
4666428 Mattioli et al. May 1987 A
4669456 Masters Jun 1987 A
4671261 Fischell Jun 1987 A
4682583 Burton et al. Jul 1987 A
4682589 Finney Jul 1987 A
4693719 Franko et al. Sep 1987 A
4699128 Hemmeter Oct 1987 A
4718410 Hakky Jan 1988 A
4724830 Fischell Feb 1988 A
4726360 Trick et al. Feb 1988 A
4730607 Fischell Mar 1988 A
4766889 Trick et al. Aug 1988 A
4773403 Daly Sep 1988 A
4782826 Fogarty Nov 1988 A
4790298 Trick Dec 1988 A
4791917 Finney Dec 1988 A
4807608 Levius Feb 1989 A
4829990 Thuroff et al. May 1989 A
4832681 Lenck May 1989 A
4881530 Trick Nov 1989 A
4881531 Timm et al. Nov 1989 A
4895139 Hauschild et al. Jan 1990 A
4899737 Lazarian Feb 1990 A
4917110 Trick Apr 1990 A
4988357 Koss Jan 1991 A
5010882 Polyak et al. Apr 1991 A
5048510 Hauschild et al. Sep 1991 A
5050592 Olmedo Sep 1991 A
5062416 Stucks Nov 1991 A
5062417 Cowen Nov 1991 A
5063914 Cowen Nov 1991 A
5067485 Cowen Nov 1991 A
5101813 Trick Apr 1992 A
5112295 Zinner et al. May 1992 A
5114398 Trick et al. May 1992 A
5129880 Grundei Jul 1992 A
5141509 Burton et al. Aug 1992 A
5167611 Cowan Dec 1992 A
5171272 Levius Dec 1992 A
5176708 Frey et al. Jan 1993 A
5250020 Bley Oct 1993 A
5263981 Polyak et al. Nov 1993 A
5283390 Hubis et al. Feb 1994 A
5344388 Maxwell et al. Sep 1994 A
5433694 Lim Jul 1995 A
5445594 Elist Aug 1995 A
5509891 DeRidder Apr 1996 A
5512033 Westrum, Jr. et al. Apr 1996 A
5553379 Westrum, Jr. et al. Sep 1996 A
5669870 Elist Sep 1997 A
5704895 Scott et al. Jan 1998 A
5730154 DeRidder Mar 1998 A
5851176 Willard Dec 1998 A
5885205 Kassman Mar 1999 A
5895424 Steele, Sr. et al. Apr 1999 A
5899849 Elist May 1999 A
6171233 Willard Jan 2001 B1
6346492 Koyfman Feb 2002 B1
6443887 Derus et al. Sep 2002 B1
6533719 Kuyava et al. Mar 2003 B2
6558315 Kuyava May 2003 B1
6579230 Yachia et al. Jun 2003 B2
6600108 Mydur et al. Jul 2003 B1
6723042 Almli et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730017 Henkel et al. May 2004 B2
6733527 Koyfman May 2004 B2
6929599 Westrum, Jr. Aug 2005 B2
6935847 Kuyava et al. Aug 2005 B2
6991601 Kuyava et al. Jan 2006 B2
7066877 Kuyava Jun 2006 B2
7066878 Eid Jun 2006 B2
7169103 Ling et al. Jan 2007 B2
7244227 Morningstar Jul 2007 B2
7250026 Kuyava Jul 2007 B2
7350538 Kuyava et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390296 Mische Jun 2008 B2
7438682 Henkel et al. Oct 2008 B2
7491164 Choi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7637861 Kuyava et al. Dec 2009 B2
7972263 Runyan Jul 2011 B2
20020033564 Koyfman Mar 2002 A1
20020082473 Henkel et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082709 Almli et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091302 Kuyava et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030028076 Kuyava et al. Feb 2003 A1
20040220447 Morningstar Nov 2004 A1
20050014993 Mische Jan 2005 A1
20060235267 George et al. Oct 2006 A1
20080103353 Jahns et al. May 2008 A1
20080114202 Kuyava et al. May 2008 A1
20090105530 Kuyava Apr 2009 A1
20090124851 Kuyava May 2009 A1
20090287042 Almli et al. Nov 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
2537506 Aug 1975 DE
0051420 May 1982 EP
0065853 Dec 1982 EP
0137752 Aug 1989 EP
0774935 Jul 1995 EP
0682923 Nov 1995 EP
0925764 Jun 1999 EP
2151484 Jul 1985 GB
2160777 Jan 1986 GB
2192546 Jan 1988 GB
8000302 Mar 1980 WO
8500513 Feb 1985 WO
WO8601398 Mar 1986 WO
9203107 Mar 1992 WO
9404095 Mar 1994 WO
WO9604865 Feb 1996 WO
02051339 Jul 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (110)
Entry
Acu-Form Penile Prosthesis, Mentor, 1 page Aug. 1997.
Agrawal, Wineet, et al., An Audit of Implanted Penile Prostheses in the UK, BJU International pp. 393-395 (2006).
Akand, Murat Mechanical Failure With Malleable Penile Prosthesis, J. Urol. 70: 1007.e11-1007.e12 (2007).
AMS Malleable 600.TM. American Medical Systems Publication 30915, 1983.
Anafarta, Kadri, Clinical Experience With Inflatable and Malleable Penile Implants in 104 Patients, Urol. Int. 56: 100-104 (1996).
Benson RC Jr, Patterson DE, Barrett DM. Long-term results with the Jonas malleable penile prosthesis. J Urol. Nov. 1985;134(5):899-901.
Burns-Cox, N., Fifteen Years Experience of Penile Prosthesis Insertion, International J. Impotence Res. (1997) 9, 211-216.
Chiang, Han-Sun, 10 Years of Experience With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Taiwanese Patients, J. Urol. vol. 163: 476-480 (2000).
Choi, Hyung Ki, Ten Years or Experience With Various Penile Prosthesis in Korean, Yasel Medical J. Wol. 35, No. 2, (1994) 209-217.
Dorfinger T, Bruskewitz R. AMS malleable penile prosthesis. Urology. Dec. 1986;28(6):480-5.
Fathey, Ahmad, Experience With Tube (Promedon—Malleable Penile Implant, Urol. Int. 2007; 79:244-247.
Ferguson, Kenneth, Prospective Long-Term Results and Quality-Of-Life-Assessment After Dura-II Penile Prosthesis Placement, Urol. 61(2) 437-441 (2003).
Fogarty, JD, Cutaneous Temperature Measurements in Men With Penile Prostheses: A Comparison Study, Int, J. of Impotence Res. (2005) 17, 506-E09.
Henry, Gerard D., Advances in Penile Prosthesis Design, Curr Sex Health report 2007;4:15-19.
Jonas U. [Silicone-silver penis prosthesis (Jonas-Eska), long-term reconstruction. J Urol. Sep. 1998;160(3 Pt 2):1164-8.
Kardar, A.H., An Unusual Complication of Penile Prosthesis Following Urethroplasty, Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 36: 89-90, 2002.
Kaufman JJ, Raz S. Use of implantable prostheses for the treatment of urinary incontinence and impotence. Am J Surg. Aug. 1975:130(2):244-50.
Khoudary, Kevin, Design Considerations in Penile Prostheses: The American Medical Systems Product Line, J. Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 7(1):55-64 (1997).
Krauss, Dennis J., Use of the Malleable Penile Prosthesis in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective Study of Postoperative . . . , J. Urol. vol. 142: 988-991(1989).
Lazarou, Stephen, Technical Advances in Penile Prostheses, J. Long-Term effects of Medical Implants, 16(3):235-247 (2006).
Montague, Drogo, Surgical Approaches for Penile Prostheses Implantation: Penoscrotal VS Infrapubic, International J. Impotence Res. (2003) 15, Suppl. 5 , S134-S135.
Morey, Allen, et al, Immediate Insertion of a Semirigid Penile Prosthesis for Refractory Ischemic Priapism, Military Medicine, 172, 11:1211, 2007.
Mulcahy, John, Another Look At the Role of Penile Prostheses in the Management of Impotence, Urology Annual 11, pp. 169-185 (1997).
Paula, B. G. Revision Surgery for Penile Implants, Int. J. Impotence res (1994) 6, 17-23.
Pearman RO. Insertion of a silastic penile prosthesis for the treatment of organic sexual impotence. J Urol. May 1972;107(5):802-6.
Randrup, Eduardo, Penile Implant Surgery: Rear Tip Extender That Stays Behind, Urology 1992 34,1 p. 87.
Rhee, Eugene, Technique for Concomitant Implantation of the Penile Prosthesis With the Male Sling, J. Urol. 173: 925-927 (2006).
Salama, Nadar, Satisfaction With the Malleable Penile Prosthesis Among Couples From the Middle East: Is It Different . . . , Int. J. Impotence Res. 16:175-180 (2004).
Small Michael, Small-Carr on Penile Prosthesis: A Report on 160 Cases and Review of the Literature, J. Urol. vol. 167, 2357-2360, Jun. 2002.
Smith, Christopher, Management of Impending Penile Prosthesis Erosion With a Polytetrafluoroethylene Distal Wind Sock Graft, J. Urol. vol. 160: 2037-2040, (1998).
Maul Judd, Experience With the AMS 600 Malleable Penile Prosthesis, J Urol. 135:929-931 (1986).
Mentor Urology Products, 18 pages (May 1998).
Merino, G. Atienza, Penile Prosthesis for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction, Actas Urol. Esp. 2036: 30 (2): 159-169.
Minervini, Andrea, Outcome of Penile Prosthesis Implantation for Treating Erectile Dysfunction: Experience With 504 Procedures, BJU International 97:129-133, (2005).
Montague, Drogo, Clinical Guidelines Panel on Erectile Dysfunction: Summary Report on the Treatment of Organic Erectile Dysfunction, J. Urol. 156:2007-2011 (1996).
Montague, Drogo, Contemporary Aspects of Penile Prosthesis Implantation, urol Int. 2003: 70: 141-146.
Montague, Drogo, Current Status of Penile Prosthesis Implantation, Urology Reports 2000, 1: 291-296.
Montague, Drogo, Experience With Semirigid Rod and Inflatable Penile Prostheses, J. Urol. 129:967-968, 1983.
Montague, Drogo, Penile Prosthesis Implantation, 712-719 1994.
Montague, Drogo, Penile Prosthesis Implantation for End-Stage Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy, Reviews in Urol. vol. 7 Suppl. 2 S51-S57 2005.
Stein, Avi et al., Malleable Penile Prosthesis Removal Leaving Behind the Rear Tip Extenders: A Clinical Presentation, Urol. Int. 50:119-120 (1993).
Surgical Protocol, Mentor 5 pages Sep. 1997.
The AMS Hydroflex Self-Contained Penile Prosthesis, American Medical Systems Publication 50513 (1985).
Yoo JJ, Lee I, Atala A. Cartilage rods as a potential material for penile reconstruction. J Urol. Sep. 1998;160(3 Pt 2):1164-8; discussion 1178.
Zerman, Dirk-Henrik, et al. Penile Prosthetic Surgery in Neurologically Impaired Patients: Long-Term Follow-Up, J Urol 175: 1041-1044. (2006).
Durazi, Mohammed et al., Penile Prosthesis Implantation for Treatment of Postpriapism Erectile Dysfunction, Urol. J. 2008:5:115-9.
Kimoto, Yasusuke et al., JSSM Guidleines for Erectile Dysfunction, Int. J. Urol (2008) 15, 564-76.
Leriche, Albert, et al., Long-Term Outcome of Forearm Flee-Flap Phalloplasy in the Treatment of Transexualism, BJU Int. (2008) 101, 1297-1300.
Natali, Alessandro, et al., Penile Implantation in Europe: Successes and Complications With W53 Implants in Italy and Germany, J Sex. Med. 2008;5:1503-12.
Simmons, M, et al., Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Past, Present and Future, Int. J. Impotence Res. (2008) 20, 437-44.
Abouassaly, R. et al., “Antibiotic-coated medical devices: with an emphasis on inflatable penile prosthesis”, Asian J Androl. Sep. 2004; 6: 249-57.
Agrawal, V. et al., “An audit of implanted penile prostheses in the UK”, BJU International 98, 293-295 (2006).
Akin-Olugbade, O. et al., “Determinants of Patient Satisfaction Following Penile Prosthesis Surgery”, J Sex Med. 2006: 3: 743-48.
Al-Najar, A., et al., “Should being aged over 70 years hinder penile prosthesis implantation?”, BJU International 2009 1-4.
AMS 700 CX Penile Prosthesis (Brochure) 2 pages 1999.
AMS 700 Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Product Line 45 pages (1992).
AMS (Brochure) 700 Series Tactile (Pump 2 pages) 2004.
AMS (Brochure) Ultrex/Ultrex Plus (10 Pages) (1998).
AMS Ambicor Penile Prosthesis (Brochure) 1996.
Merino, G. Atienza, “Penile Prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction” Actas Urol Esp. 2006; 30(2): 159-69.
Bella, A. et al., “Initial experience with 50 patients using the new AMS 700 with MS Pump Series inflatable penile prosthesis” Poster #44 J Sex Med., Jan. 2008;5 (suppl 1) p. 20.
Candela, J. et al., “Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation . . . ” J La State Med Soc 148:296-301 (1996).
Daitch, J et al., “Long-Term Mechanical Reliability of AMS 700 Series Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Comparison . . . ” J. Urol. 158: 1400-1402; Oct. 1997.
Delk, J. “Early Experience with the American Medical Systems New Tactile Pump: Results of a Multicenter Study” J Sex Med., 2005; 2:266-271.
Deuk Choi, Y. et al., “Mechanical Reliability of the AMS 700 CXM Inflatable Penile Prosthesis for the Treatment of Male Erectile Dysfuntion” J. Urol. 168, 822-824, Mar. 2001.
Deveci, S. et al., “Penile Length Alterations following Penile Prosthesis Surgery” European Urol. 51 (2007) 1128-31.
Durazi, M. et al., “Penile Prosthesis Implantation for Treatment of Postpriapism Erectile Dysfunction” Urol. J. 5(2) (2008) 115-19.
Eid, J., “What is new for inflatable penile prostheses?” Curr. Opin. Urol. 19:582-588 (2009).
Gefen, A. “Stresses in the normal and diabetic human penis following implantation of an inflatable prosthesis.” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 1999, 37, 625-31.
Garber, B. “Inflatable penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.” Exper Rev. Med. Devices 2(3), 341-50 (2005).
Gefen, A. et al., “A biomechanical model of Peyronie's disease” J. Biomech. 33 (2000) 1739-44.
Gefen, A. et al., “Optimization of Design and Surgical Positioning of Inflatable Penile Prostheses” Annals of Biomed. Eng. 28 (2000) 619-28.
Henry, G. et al., “Revision Washout Decreases Implant Capsule Tissue Culture Positivity: A Multicenter Study” J. Urol. vol. 179, 186-190, Jan. 2008.
Henry, G. “Historical Review of Penile Prosthesis Design and Surgical Techniques: Part 1 of a Three-Part Review Series on Penile Prosthetic Surgery” J. Sex Med. 2009; 6:675-681.
Henry, G. “Updates in inflatable Penile Prostheses” Urol Clin N Am 34 (2007) 535-547.
Hoebeke, P. et al., “Erectile Implants in Female-to-Male Transsexuals: Our Experience in 129 Patients” Eur. Urol. (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.013.
InhibiZone Antibiotic Surface Treatment, (AMS Brochure) 4 pages 2001.
Kadioglu, A. et al., “Surgical Treatment of Peyronie's Disease: A Critical Analysis” European Urology 50 (2006) 235-248.
Kava, B. et al., “Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction Associated with Penile Prosthesis Revision Surgery” J. Sex Med. 2007; 4:509-518.
Leriche, A., Long-term outcome of forearm flee-lap phalloplasty in the treatment of transsexualism: BJU International 101: 1297-1300 2008.
Levine, L. et al., “Mechanical Reliability and Safety of, and Patient Satisfaction with the Ambicor Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Results of a 2 Center Study”, J. Urol. vol. 166, 932-937, Sep. 2001.
Lumen, N. “Phalloplasty: A Valuable Treatment for Males with Penile Insufficiency”, Urology 71(2), 2008 272-276.
Lux, M. et al., “Outcomes and Satisfaction Rates for the Redesigned 2-Piece Penile Prosthesis” J. Urol. vol. 177, 262-266, Jan. 2007.
Mentor New from Mentor Urology Alpha I Narrow-Base (Brochure) 2 pages 1996.
Mentor Alpha I Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (Brochure) 2 pages Jul. 1996.
Mentor Surgical Protocol Alpha I Inflatable Penile Prosthesis 17 pages May 1998.
Mentor Patient Guide for Alpha I Inflatable Penile Implant (Brochure) 2 pages 1997.
Mulcahy, J. “Distal Corporoplasty for Lateral Extrusion of Penile Prosthesis Cylinders” J. Urol. vol. 161, 193-195 Jan. 1999.
Murphy, AM. et al., “Failure of the Ambicors inflatable penile prosthesis to deflate” International Journal of Impotence Research (2005) 17. 291-292.
Nahrstadt, BC. et al. “Informed consent for penile prosthesis”, International Journal of Impotence Research (2009) 21, 37-50.
“Parylene Micro Coating” AMS Brochure, 4 pages 2000.
Sadeghi-Nejad, H. “Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Review of Prosthetic Devices and Associated Complications” J. Sex Med. 2007; 4:296-309.
Scarzella, IG. et al., “Use of Ambicor Penile Prosthesis in Peyronie's Disease and as Replacement for Malfunctioning AMS 700 Devices”, J. Sex Med. 2004; Suppl. 1.
Simmons, M. et al., “Penile prosthesis implantation: past, present and future”, International Journal of Impotence Research (2008) 20, 437-444.
Ultrex Plus Penile Prosthesis (AMS Advertisement) 1 page (1992).
Wang, Shyh-Jen et al., “Hardness evaluation of penile prostheses”, International Journal of Urology (2006) 13, 569-572.
Mentor Surgical Protocol Alpha I Inflatable Penile Prosthesis 15 pages 1998.
Mentor Urology Products, (Brochure), Mentor, 20 pages (1998).
Hellstrom, WJG “Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis components (surgical pearls on reservoirs, pumps, and rear-tip extenders)”, International Journal of Impotence Research (2003) 15, Suppl 5, S136-S138.
Kim, Sae-Chui, “Mechanical Reliability of AMS Hydraulic Penile Prostheses” J. of Korean Med. Sci. 10(6); 422-425, Dec. 1995.
Mooreville, M. et al., “Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in Patients with Severe Corporeal Fibrosis: Intraoduction of a New Penile Cavernotome”, J. Urol. 162, 2054-2057, Dec. 1999.
Montague, DK “Early Experience with the Controlled Girth and Length Expanding Cylinder of the American Medical Systems Ultrex Penile Prosthesis”, J. Urol. 148; 1444-1446, Nov. 1992.
Montague, DK “Cylinder Sizing: less is more”, International Journal of Impotence Research (2003) 15, Suppl 5, S132-S133.
Montague, DK et al., “Future considerations: advances in the surgical management of erectile dysfunction”, International J. Impotence Res. (200) 12, Suppl 4, S140-S143.
Montague, DK et al., “AMS 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Men with Peyronie's Disease: Comparison of Cx and Ultrex Cylinders” J. Urol. 156, 1633-1635, Nov. 1996.
Montague, DK et al., “Penile Prosthesis Infections” International Journal of Impotence Research (2001) 13, 326-328.
Malloy, T. et al., “Imporved Mechanical Survival with Revised Model Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Using Rear-Tip Extenders”, J. Urol. 128 Sep. 1982, 489-491.
Chang, Yao-Jen et al., “Penile Prosthesis Implantation” eMedicine http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3047.htm 19 pages (2003).
Gregory, J., et al., “The Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Failure of the Rear Tip Extender in Reducing the Incidence of Cylinder Leakage” J. Urol. vol. 131 668-669 (1984).
Joseph, D. et al., “Bilateral Dislocation of Rear Tip Extenders fro the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis” J. Urol. vol. 128, Dec. 1982 1317-1318.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090105818 A1 Apr 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60981844 Oct 2007 US