This patent specification is in the field of mammography and specifically mammography employing flat panel, digital x-ray receptors rather than x-ray film.
X-ray mammography machines typically use an x-ray source mounted at one end of a rotatable c-arm assembly and an image receptor at the other. Between the x-ray source and the image receptor is a device for compressing and immobilizing a breast. Until recently, the image receptor was typically a screen-film (s/f) cassette, which generated an image related to the detected transmission of x-rays through the breast. These s/f cassettes typically come in standard sizes, e.g., 18 cm×24 cm (small) and 24 cm×30 cm (large), with the large cassette used when the breast is too large to be uniformly compressed by the small cassette. The cassettes are easily attachable and removable from a breast support tray of a conventional mammography system. The device for compressing the breast is often called a paddle, and comes in a variety of sizes to match both the cassette size and the breast size. Such matching is desirable because the use of a small size paddle on a large breast can result in uneven and inadequate breast compression and may not allow full-breast imaging, while using a large paddle on a small breast can impede access to the breast, which is important during the compression cycle in order to optimize the amount of breast tissue brought into the field of view of the image receptor.
New mammography systems are now being developed to use digital image receptors as replacements for the screen-film cassettes. These digital image receptors, sometimes called flat panel receptors, or flat panel digital x-ray receptors, are different in many ways from s/f cassettes. They have many advantages, but also tend to be heavier and somewhat thicker. Typically, they are not designed to be removable in normal use, so a system normally will employ only one size image receptor. These characteristics can presents challenges for some imaging procedures and breast sizes, particularly for the mediolateral oblique view (MLO) taken as a part of typical breast x-ray imaging. As with screen-film systems, it is still advantageous to use a compression paddle that matches the breast size. This typically means that the compression paddles will be removable, and there will be a selection of paddle sizes available with the system.
A number of x-ray protocols have been used for breast imaging. One common view is the cranio-caudal (CC) view, illustrates in
To applicants' knowledge, these and other issues regarding compression paddle use with flat panel digital receptors in mammography have not been solved and perhaps have not been even addressed. In a different setting, it has been proposed to move a compression paddle laterally, relative to the proximal edge of the screen-film cassette, but for the different purpose of aligning a cutout in the paddle with a particular portion of the breast. See U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,056. This is believed to require a paddle larger that would normally be used for the breast size so as to maintain even compression when the cutout is off-center relative to the breast. Other earlier proposals are known for features such as collimation that adjusts to film cassette size, source-to-image distance and/or cross-sectional area to be imaged (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,502,878, 3,863,073, 5,627,869, and 6,149,301), moving a paddle (U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,950), moving a cassette (U.S. Pat. No. 4,989,227), and retracting a cassette holder (U.S. Pat. No. 4,559,641). The cited patents are hereby incorporated by reference in this patent specification.
An object of the disclosed system and method is to provide mammography that overcomes known disadvantages of proposals involving the otherwise desirable use of flat panel, digital x-ray receptors.
Another object is to employ compression paddles that match both the size and position of the patient's breast relative to the proximal edge of a digital x-ray image receptor so as to improve image quality, patient comfort and the ability of the health professional to position the breast optimally for imaging.
Another is to provide automated collimation control that changes x-ray beam collimation in accordance with one or more of the size and position of the compression paddle and of the breast, and the position of a breast platform relative to the receptor, preferably in response to information that is automatically sensed.
Another is to provide x-ray exposure control that is responsive to at least one of the size and position of the compression paddle, the position of the breast, and a pre-exposure x-ray measurement, preferably in response to information that is automatically sensed.
Another is to provide a scatter-suppression grid that is retracted for image magnification protocols, preferably automatically in response to sensing a breast position for magnification imaging.
These and other objects are met in a non-limiting example comprising a mammography system having a flat panel digital x-ray receptor, an x-ray source selectively emitting a collimated x-ray beam toward the receptor, and a compression paddle of a selectable size mounted for selective movement at least along a proximal edge of the x-ray receptor and a paddle of an appropriate size also is positioned off-center relative the same proximal edge to compress the breast for x-ray imaging.
In addition, the system includes one or more of a number of other features. An exposure control can be responsive to information regarding breast thickness along the beam direction to control x-ray exposure for imaging. This information can come from a conventional auto-exposure sensor (AES) resulting from a pre-exposure, low-dose firing of the x-ray source, from an output of the digital x-ray receptor during such pre-exposure firing, and/or from sensors for the relative positions of the x-ray source, the x-ray receptor, the compression paddle and/or the breast tray. The system can include a collimation control responsive to information regarding one or more of the size of the paddle, its location along the beam. its location relative to the proximal edge of the receptor, a desired field of view, magnification parameters, and the like. This information can come from appropriate sensors and/or can be input by the health professional carrying out imaging. The system can include a scatter-suppressing grid selectively movable between a position in the path of the imaging beam and a position outside that path (for magnification imaging). Again, information for controlling grid position can come from one or more different sources. And, the system can include a built-in or a separate viewing station receiving x-ray image information from the x-ray receptor and possibly from some or all of the sensors, processing it, and displaying the results as an image and/or in other forms.
Referring to
In use for a CC view, paddle 2 and its supporting arm 6 are moved up, breast 3 is positioned on tray 11 and compressed by bringing paddle 2 down as needed. With suitable collimation by collimators 40 (which typically collimate in two directions, of which only one is illustrated in
Referring to
a, 4b, and 4c illustrate an alternate arrangement for lateral adjustment of paddle 2. Here a paddle 2 of a selected size and possibly shape is removably secured to arm 6, and arm 6 is in turn slidably secured to frame 7 to slide laterally, along the direction of proximal edge 5a of receptor 5. The term “lateral” is used here to designate movement parallel to, or at least generally along, the proximal edge 5a, even when the imaging plane of receptor 5 is oriented for an MLO view or is vertical. For example,
It should be clear than many other arrangements and variations will be apparent to persons skilled in the technology based on the disclosure in this patent specification and that the above embodiments are only some of examples embodying inventions whose scope is defined by the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US02/33058 | 10/17/2002 | WO | 00 | 10/18/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/037046 | 5/1/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3502878 | Stewart | Mar 1970 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | Jul 1991 | E |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsujii | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050063509 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |