The present invention is related to Copper line data transmission with HDSL.
Transmission with HDSL on copper pairs in the local loop is limited in range by cross talk between pairs in the same cable. To cover the range between telecom operators access points and subscriber locations, the use of transmission regenerators are necessary.
For maintenance and error detection and recovery, fault isolation on such systems must be achievable. A way of obtaining this is to provide the regenerators with a facility of looping the signal back to the access points. The regenerators are not easily accessible (dug into the ground), and thus a remote controlling of this looping is needed.
For HDSL (High speed Digital Subscriber Line) transmission systems, a regenerator management is defined as part of the transmission overhead (EOC) channel between the two endpoints of the line, NT and LT respectively. (References; TS 101135 section 5.7.5 from ETSI and G.991.1 section B5.7.1. from ITU.) The standards define the same set of functions for the regenerator as for the endpoints.
In practical systems, the endpoint functionality is expensive, and a limited functionality is very often preferred. The use of the overhead channel for regenerator maintenance also requires that this channel is terminated and regenerated, and this introduces transmission delay and implementation complexity. A regenerator is powered via the transmission lines, and reduction of power consumption, which can be achieved by lower complexity, will extend the distance for remote powering. A pure transmission repeater without overhead channel processing should be a more optimum solution, but it requires another solution of maintenance loop setting.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an arrangement that eliminates the drawbacks described above. The features defined in the claims enclosed characterize this method.
More specifically, the present invention is related to a regenerator solution by the use of signal repeaters instead of a regenerator as described in the references, and a solution for remote control of switching a transmission loop ON and OFF.
Compared to the known way of HDSL, regenerator management according to the present invention enables the use of signal repeaters which still have the required practical functionality for management.
In order to make the invention more readily understandable, the discussion that follows will refer to the accompanying drawings.
When starting up an HDSL transmission system like the one in
When a regenerator between LT and NT is at present, the activation/deactivation is between the LT and REG and between the REG and NT. After successful parameter exchange, the transmission is defined to be active and data can be transferred between the endpoints. From active state, the transmission can be deactivated. This activation/deactivation process can be detected in the repeater and used to alternate the repeater to send data transparent between the LT and NT or do a loop back of transmitted data back to the LT.
According to the present invention, this alternation can be made in such a way that every time there is a deactivation/activation command from LT, a flip-flop in the repeater is being toggled. Flip-flop high can be interpreted as loop while flip-flop low is interpreted as transparency. The overhead channel is passing through the repeater between the endpoints LT-NT untouched.
The present invention makes use of one of the free bits in the overhead channel as an origin bit which is set to “1” in the upstream direction and “0” in the downstream direction, for thereby making it possible to detect at the access point (LT) whether there is a loop in the repeater or not by looking at the received origin bit. Origin bit “0” indicates loop while origin bit “1” indicates data transparency.
As the complete overhead channel is looped back, it is also possible to check the transmission quality by looking at the standardised HDSL error, monitoring in the same way as with a normal end-to-end connection.
The main advantage of the present invention is that it allows using passive repeaters for regeneration on the transmission line in an HDSL system, and still having the possibility for remote maintenance and management.
Another advantage is that passive repeaters are much less power consuming than conventional regenerators, and are also less complex and smaller.
Still another advantage of the present invention is that no data processing needs to be carried out in the repeater. All signals are simply amplified and passed through the repeater. Therefore, the delay introduced in the repeater is limited to a minimum. Also, the fact that the repeater does not need to have any significant software installed, contributes to minimizing the likelihood of errors, and the probable lifetime will increase.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20005754 | Nov 2000 | NO | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4402075 | Bargeton et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4451916 | Casper et al. | May 1984 | A |
4686668 | Koseki et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5060226 | Gewin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5243593 | Timbs | Sep 1993 | A |
5347566 | Law et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5422876 | Turudic | Jun 1995 | A |
5784558 | Emerson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5892756 | Murphy | Apr 1999 | A |
5909445 | Schneider | Jun 1999 | A |
6208670 | Milliron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6891851 | Demakakos | May 2005 | B1 |
20020061058 | Sommer | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63074 | Apr 1988 | JP |
05344 | Dec 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020057652 A1 | May 2002 | US |