1. Technical Field
This invention relates to managing requests in a computer system. More specifically, the invention relates to ensuring that a thread will be available to process a request prior to initiating execution of the request.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In a distributed computer system with shared persistent storage, one or more server nodes are in communication with one or more client nodes.
In the distributed computing system of
One prior art solution is to reserve a quantity of threads in a thread pool, wherein the reserved threads are exclusively for use with secondary requests in a nested request. By reserving a quantity of threads for use as secondary requests in a nested request, an operator mitigates a deadlock situation associated with a nested request and encourages availability of threads to complete the nested request. However, there are drawbacks associated with reserving a pool of threads exclusively for secondary requests of a nested request. A quantity of threads in a multithreaded processing system is statically generated. As such, there are a finite number of threads available. One drawback is designating a defined quantity of threads for secondary requests without prior knowledge as to whether a first execution thread is part of a nested request. If the reserved threads are not available for other requests, the availability of threads for all requests is reduced. Accordingly, in a system with a predefined quantity of threads, reserving a set quantity of threads for servicing secondary requests is not an efficient allocation of threads.
Another prior art solution, U.S. patent Publication 2002/0194377 to Doolittle et al., uses multiple pools, i.e. data structures, for holding threads, wherein different pools are reserved for different stages in a nested request. Threads are redistributed among thread pools when a potential exhaustion of a pool is discovered. Accordingly, the quantity of available threads among a plurality of thread pools is dynamically modified in order to honor all service requests.
However, there are limitations associated with what is disclosed in the Doolittle et al. publication. For example, management of threads in the manner taught by Doolittle et al. can be complex and expensive to operate. There is therefore a need for management of threads in a system that supports nested requests that does not require any added expense. In addition, such a solution should make all threads eligible to support any stage in a nested request.
This invention comprises a method and system for management of threads in a distributed computer system.
In one aspect of the invention, a method is provided for managing a computer system. Commitment of a service thread to servicing a request depending on an external reply thread is monitored. Availability of reply threads in a single thread pool is tracked.
In yet another aspect of the invention an article is provided in a computer-readable recordable data storage medium. Instructions are provided in communication with the medium to manage execution of a nested request. The instructions include configuration of a thread pool with a nested request wherein a service thread is dependent on a separate second execution thread to complete the request. In addition, instructions are provided to track availability of the second execution thread to complete the nested request, and to commit the service thread to the nested request based upon the availability of the second execution thread. Availability of the reply thread from the thread pool is tracked prior to commitment of the service thread to the request.
Other features and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In a computer system, a plurality of threads are statically generated to satisfy requests. A nested request is a request which requires at least two non-concurrently executing threads for completion of execution of associated instructions. A first thread, known as a service thread, will require at least one second thread, known as a reply thread, for completion of the request. In an efficient system, a service thread that is part of a nested request will not begin execution until it is guaranteed that a reply thread will be available for completion of the request.
Threads represent a single sequence of instructions executed in parallel with other sequences. A set quantity of threads is generated when the associated computer system is configured. A data structure that maintains threads is also known as a thread pool. Requests are sent to the thread pool. Each task request to the thread pool is executed by one of the threads. If there are more requests than threads, the requests are placed in a queue in order to be serviced.
Once it has been determined that the service thread requires one or more threads to complete the request, the service thread obtains an exclusive lock on the counter of the thread pool (110). The counter has a threshold value that corresponds to the maximum quantity of threads in the pool. A test is conducted to determine if the value of the counter is below the threshold limit of the counter (112). If the value of the counter has reached the threshold, this is an indication that there are no threads available from the thread pool (50) for completion of the request. Following a negative response to the test at step (112), the exclusive lock on the counter is release by the service thread (114), and a transient failure message, i.e. an abort message, is sent to the service thread that initiated the thread request and the reply thread is returned to the thread pool (116). However, if it is determined at step (112) that the value of the counter is below the threshold limit, the counter is incremented (118) and the state characteristic of the service thread is set (120) to indicate that the service thread is committed to the execution of the request. In one embodiment, a state characteristic may be a bit that identifies commitment of a thread to a request. Following step (120) the service thread releases the exclusive lock on the counter (122) and continues to process the nested request (124). Accordingly, prior to initiating execution of a request, the service thread ensures availability of at least one additional thread and sets a self identifier indicating commitment of the service thread to completion of the request.
Following step (118), the service thread may continue with the request, knowing that all the threads it requires have been reserved from the thread pool (50).
The method and system shown herein enable efficient allocation of threads for use in a nested request while avoiding a deadlock scenario. All of the threads are maintained in a single thread pool that has a counter associated therewith to track the quantity of threads in the data structure at any one time. In addition, each service thread has an identifier to indicate whether the thread is committed to a request. Once availability of a thread from the thread pool has been confirmed, the identifier of the service thread is marked to note commitment of the thread to the associated request. Accordingly, the combination of the thread pool with the service thread identifier ensures that execution of a nested request is not initiated until it has been determined that the necessary resources are available to complete the nested request.
It will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular, a nested or non-nested request may require multiple threads from the thread pool for completion of the request(s). The counter of the thread pool may be incremented by the quantity of threads required for completion of the request(s). In addition, as more clients and/or servers are added to the distributed computer system, threads may be added to the thread pool by the additional clients and/or servers. Finally, the thread pool counter described herein is a counter of committed threads. However, the counter may be functionally replaced by a counter of uncommitted threads with suitable modifications to the operation that initialize, update, and examine the state of the counter. Accordingly, the scope of protection of this invention is limited only by the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5016167 | Nguyen et al. | May 1991 | A |
5303368 | Kotaki | Apr 1994 | A |
5706515 | Connelly et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5752031 | Cutler et al. | May 1998 | A |
6003066 | Ryan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6122712 | Torii | Sep 2000 | A |
6247121 | Akkary et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6418460 | Bitar et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427161 | LiVecchi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438551 | Holmskar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477561 | Robsman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6529962 | Azagury et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6769122 | Daudel | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6950927 | Apisdorf et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7013400 | Kalla et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7093230 | E et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137115 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139781 | Young et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20010010052 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020078121 | Ballantyne | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020124241 | Grey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020194377 | Doolittle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030088609 | Guedalia et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030145035 | de Bonet | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040019639 | E et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019892 | E. et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040078779 | Dutt et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139433 | Blythe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210902 | Such | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220976 | Ananthanarayanan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230877 | Clark et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1308839 | May 2003 | EP |
2230429 | Sep 1990 | JP |
3174633 | Jul 1991 | JP |
WO 03014864 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050262159 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |