This description relates to managing data queries.
Data can be stored in databases and arranged in various forms such as database tables. A database table can contain a set of data having a common theme or purpose. The arrangement of a database table can be defined by a database scheme, and multiple database tables can have similar or identical arrangements. Further, the contents of a database and its associated database tables can change over time as data is adjusted, appended or deleted. Various techniques can be used to transfer data into and out of a database and to manipulate the data in the database.
In one aspect, in general, a method of preparing a database query for use by a data management system includes receiving a database query, receiving information about a database table from a data storage, the database table being populated with data elements, producing a structural representation of the database table wherein the structural representation includes a formatted data organization reflective of the database table and is absent the data elements of the database table, and providing the structural representation and the database query to a plan generator capable of producing a query plan representing operations for executing the database query on the database table.
Aspects can include one or more of the following features.
The database query includes an SQL query.
Producing the structural representation of the database table includes determining data types from data structures in the database table, and assigning the data types to corresponding data structures in the structural representation.
Producing the structural representation of the database table includes determining data storage sizes of the data elements in the database table, and assigning the calculated data storage sizes to the structural representation.
Receiving the information about the database table includes identifying the database table based on a data source registry.
The data source registry contains data formats, keys, and indices of data sources.
In one aspect, in general, a method of generating a dataflow graph representing a database query includes receiving a query plan from a plan generator, the query plan representing operations for executing a database query on a database table, and producing a dataflow graph from the query plan, wherein the dataflow graph includes at least one node that represents at least one operation represented by the query plan, and includes at least one link that represents at least one dataflow associated with the query plan.
Aspects can include one or more of the following features.
The database query includes an SQL query.
Thee dataflow graph includes at least one node receiving a flow of data from at least one input dataset, and at least one node providing a flow of data to at least one output dataset.
The method further includes providing the database table to the dataflow graph, and executing the dataflow graph.
The method further includes receiving the output of the database query from the dataflow graph.
The plan generator includes a query optimizer.
Generating a specification of a dataflow graph includes mapping query operations of the query plan to components of the dataflow graph.
The query plan includes data types of parameters in the database query.
The database query contains a reference to an executable function, and the specification of a dataflow graph includes a component representing the executable function.
In one aspect, in general, a method of generating a dataflow graph representing a database query includes receiving an SQL query, receiving information about a database table from a data storage, the database table being populated with data elements, producing a structural representation of the database table wherein the structural representation includes a formatted data organization reflective of the database table and is absent the data of the database table, providing the structural representation and the SQL query to a plan generator capable of producing a query plan representing operations for executing the SQL query on the database table, receiving a query plan from the plan generator, and producing a dataflow graph from the query plan, wherein the dataflow graph includes at least one node that represents at least one operation represented by the query plan, and includes at least one link that represents at least one dataflow associated with the query plan.
In one aspect, in general, a system for preparing a database query for use by a data management system includes a data storage containing information about a database table, the database table being populated with data elements, and a computer system configured to receive a database query, produce a structural representation of the database table wherein the structural representation includes a formatted data organization reflective of the database table and is absent the data elements of the database table, and provide the structural representation and a database query to a plan generator capable of producing a query plan representing operations for executing the database query on the database table.
In one aspect, in general, a system for generating a dataflow graph representing a database query includes a computer system configured to receive a query plan from a plan generator, the query plan representing operations for executing a database query on a database table, and produce a dataflow graph from the query plan, wherein the dataflow graph includes at least one node that represents at least one operation represented by the query plan, and includes at least one link that represents at least one dataflow associated with the query plan.
In one aspect, in general, a system for preparing a database query for use by a data management system includes means for storing information about a database table, the database table being populated with data elements, and means for processing database queries, the processing including receiving a database query, producing a structural representation of the database table wherein the structural representation includes a formatted data organization reflective of the database table and is absent the data elements of the database table, and providing the structural representation and the database query to a plan generator capable of producing a query plan representing operations for executing the database query on the database table.
In one aspect, in general, a system for generating a dataflow graph representing a database query includes means for processing a query plan, the processing including receiving a query plan from a plan generator, the query plan representing operations for executing a database query on a database table, and producing a dataflow graph from the query plan, wherein the dataflow graph includes at least one node that represents at least one operation represented by the query plan, and includes at least one link that represents at least one dataflow associated with the query plan.
In one aspect, in general, a computer-readable medium storing a computer program for preparing a database query for use by a data management system includes instructions for causing a computer to receive a database query, receive information about a database table from a data storage, the database table being populated with data elements, produce a structural representation of the database table wherein the structural representation includes a formatted data organization reflective of the database table and is absent the data elements of the database table, and provide the structural representation and the database query to a plan generator capable of producing a query plan representing operations for executing the database query on the database table.
In one aspect, in general, a computer-readable medium storing a computer program for generating a dataflow graph representing a database query includes instructions for causing a computer to receive a query plan from a plan generator, the query plan representing operations for executing a database query on a database table, and produce a dataflow graph from the query plan, wherein the dataflow graph includes at least one node that represents at least one operation represented by the query plan, and includes at least one link that represents at least one dataflow associated with the query plan.
1 Databases, Queries, and Graphs
A database management system handles data stored in one or more databases. To store such data, database storage can take one or more forms such as database tables, which can be collections of data organized into data structures such as rows and columns. In one construct, each row represents a record of data, and each column represents a field within each of the rows.
The information contained in a database can be accessed and processed (e.g., modified) using database queries. A database query is a set of instructions describing a subset of the database contents and actions to take upon the data in that subset. For example, some database systems perform database queries written in a dedicated database query language such as Structured Query Language (SQL). In theses database systems, an SQL query is the primary instrument for manipulating the contents of the database.
In some implementations, database queries and other computations associated with a database management system in a graphical representation. For example, data may be represented as passing through a collection of operations, referred to as a dataflow. In one arrangement, a dataflow may be provided through a directed graph, with components of the computation being associated with the vertices of the graph and dataflows between the components corresponding to links (arcs, edges) of the graph. A graph is a modular entity and may be connected to or combined with other modular graphs. Each graph can be made up of one or more other graphs, and a particular graph can be a component in a larger graph. A graphical development environment (GDE) provides a user interface for specifying executable graphs and defining parameters for the graph components. A system that implements such graph-based computations is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,966,072, E
Referring to
Some graph-based database systems are used to process database queries. For example, a database query can be applied to one or more database tables to extract an identified subset of the database table contents, for example, for processing in a dataflow. In some implementations, a graph-based database system accepts and executes database queries in the form of dataflow graphs. Other database systems may use other types of database queries.
In some cases, one or more database tables are moved to a graph-based database system from another kind of database system that uses SQL. The other database system may have many SQL queries already written that are incompatible with the graph-based database system. In some implementations, the SQL queries can be converted to database queries compatible with the graph-based database system.
However, the graph-based database management system does not have built-in functionality for processing SQL queries, so a graph-based database query can be produced to emulate the SQL database query 200. The graph-based database query is recognizable by the graph-based database system. For example, the database query 200 can be converted 206 from an SQL query into a dataflow graph 208. The dataflow graph 208 operates on the database tables 202, 204 by accepting them as input, and provides the execution results of the database query 200 as output.
2 Query Plans
Some database systems carry out database queries such as SQL queries based on a query plan (also sometimes called an explain plan). A query plan is a description of the database operations that may be performed if the database query is executed. The query plan may describe one possible arrangement of database operations, even if other arrangements of the operations or a different set of operations would accomplish the same result.
To provide such query plans, a database system may include a query plan generator (also sometimes called a query planner). For example, the query plan generator can produce a query plan when a database query is being executed, or the query plan generator can generate a query plan before any decision about executing the query is made.
In some arrangements, database operations may be executed in various orders while still providing equivalent outputs. As such, the query plan generator may have functionality that determines an optimal query plan. For example, an optimal query plan could be the query plan that describes the arrangement of database operations for executing the database query in the least amount of time, or using the least amount of database resources such as data storage space, or otherwise accomplishing the database query within constraints that have been identified by the database system. The query plan generator's functionality for determining an optimal query plan may include functionality that scores or ranks many possible query plans, and may also include functionality that rearranges possible query plans to an optimal or efficient configuration.
A single database query can be executed multiple times, and each execution could have a unique optimal query plan. For example, the data within a database table could change between two executions of a database query. In this example, the operations described in the query plan that was generated for the first execution of the database query may need more or less execution time during the second execution of the database query than during the first execution. In this case, a different arrangement of operations may be better suited to the second execution of the database query, for example, a different arrangement of the same operations, or an arrangement of different operations. A query plan optimized for the second execution of the database query can be generated for that execution, taking into account the momentary state of the database table.
3 System Overview
A query plan generator can be used in producing a graph-based database query that emulates another kind of database query such as an SQL query.
The database query management system 300 also includes a query planning computer system 316 that executes a query plan generator 318. The query plan generator 318 can be any query plan generator that produces a query plan from a database query, and need not be designed with any functionality related to dataflow graphs or graph generation. Further, the database query management system 300 also includes a database computer system 320 having a database 322 in a data storage (e.g. a hard drive, optical disc, etc.) and containing one or more database tables 324a, 324b, 324c.
Although separate computer systems are shown for the database management computer system 304, the graph generation computer system 308, the query planning computer system 316, and the database computer system 320, two or more of these computer systems could be the same computer system, or components of the same computer system. All of the computer systems have at least one processor for executing their respective executable components and at least one data storage system. The computer systems can be connected to each other using a computer network such as a local area network (LAN), a wide-area network (WAN), a network such as the Internet, or another kind of computer network.
To demonstrate the production of a dataflow graph 312 from one or more database queries 302, a database query and a database table 326 are received and processed by the graph generation computer system 308 prior to an execution of the dataflow graph. The graph generation computer system 308 receives the database table 326 from the database computer system 320.
The database table 326 can take any of several forms. For example, the database table 326 could be a relational database table, a partial database table, a flat file, or another kind of data file or collection of data files. In some examples, the database table 326 could be received in the form of information about the database table, e.g. metadata about the database table, or a description of the database table.
In some implementations, the database table 326 could be identified by a data registry associated with the database computer system 320 or otherwise accessible to the graph generation computer system 308. The data registry could be in the form of lookup file catalog, for example, which may contain a data file location associated with the database table 326, and primary key and index information associated with the database table. The data registry could also provide information about the data formats for different types of database tables. Further, the data registry could also provide information about how a dataflow graph 312 can access the database table.
The graph generation computer system 308 also receives a database query 302 to be applied to the database table 326. For example, the database query could be an SQL query. The database query 302 could be received from any number of possible sources. For example, the database query 302 could be received from a user interface 328 where a user 330 has entered the database query. In some examples, the database query 302 is received from a data storage, or the database query is received from a computer network such as the Internet, or the database query is generated based on another previously-received database query.
In some implementations, the graph generation computer system 308 provides (as represented by an arrow 332) a version of the database table 326 to the query planning computer system 316, produced from information about the database table 326. For example, the version of the database table 326 provided to the query planning computer system 316 could be a structural representation 334 of the database table that is smaller in size than the database table and thus requires fewer computational resources to process. The structural representation 334 of the database table 326 may contain information about the database table, but is absent some or all of the data of the database table. For example, the structural representation 334 of the database table 326 could contain a format that reflects the format of the database table, such as the columns, rows, or fields of the database table. The structural representation 334 of the database table 326 could also contain information about the data, such as data storage sizes of elements in the database table, or the data types of elements in the database table.
The graph generation computer system provides (as represented by the arrow 332) the database query 302 and the structural representation 334 of the database table 326 to the query planning computer system 316. The query planning computer system 316 executes the query plan generator 318, which produces a query plan optimized for executing the database query 302 over the database table 326. The structural representation 334 of the database table 326 supplies the same information used by the query plan generator 318 as would be supplied by the database table 326 itself, for example, data sizes, data types, and other information about the data contained in the database table. In some implementations, the structural representation 334 of the database table 326 includes an index of data elements that is used to optimize data lookup and retrieval. The query plan generator 318 can use the index to calculate the speed of identifying and retrieving data elements from the indexed database table 326.
The graph generation computer system 308 receives a query plan 314 from the query planning computer system 316. The query plan 314 describes an arrangement of database operations that can be used to execute the database query 302 over the database table 326. For example, the operations in the query plan 314 can correspond to nodes of a dataflow graph 312. The query plan 314 can also include information about the data types used by the operations in the query plan. For example, the operations in the query plan could have parameters, and the data types of the parameters could be described in the query plan.
Once produced, the query plan 314 is provided to the graph generation computer system 308 for dataflow graph 312 production by the graph generation engine 310. The graph generation engine 310 outputs a dataflow graph 312 corresponding to the query plan 314. In some implementations, the dataflow graph 312 has nodes representing operations described in the query plan, and node links representing flows of data between the operations. Because a dataflow graph 312 may be generated for each instance of preparing a database query for execution, the graph generation engine 310 can generate a dataflow graph quickly enough to respond to real-time requests to execute a database query. In some implementations, the graph generation engine 310 can generate a dataflow graph from a query plan in less than one second.
The graph generation computer system 308 provides (represented by an arrow 336) the dataflow graph 312 generated by the graph generation engine 316 to the database management computer system 304. In some implementations, the graph generation computer system 308 also prepares the database table 326 for use by the database management computer system and provides the prepared database table 338. For example, graph generation computer system 308 might convert the database table 326 from a format used by the graph generation computer system 308 to a format used by the database management computer system 304.
Once provided to the database management computer system 304, the dataflow graph 312 is prepared for execution. As shown in
4 Structural Representation
The structural representation 502 of the database table 500 (produced by the graph generation computer system 308 as shown in
5 Function Calls
As shown in
In some implementations, the custom graph function 602 may be a function used for accessing data in a special or customized format, or the custom graph function may be a function used to execute a regular expression or pattern matching expression, or the custom graph function may be a function implemented by a user, for example, a user of the database management computer system.
6 Flow of Operation
The database query managing approach described above can be implemented using software for execution on a computer. For instance, the software forms procedures in one or more computer programs that execute on one or more programmed or programmable computer systems (which may be of various architectures such as distributed, client/server, or grid) each including at least one processor, at least one data storage system (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device or port, and at least one output device or port. The software may form one or more modules of a larger program, for example, that provides other services related to the design and configuration of computation graphs. The nodes and elements of the graph can be implemented as data structures stored in a computer readable medium or other organized data conforming to a data model stored in a data repository.
The software may be provided on a storage medium, such as a CD-ROM, readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer or delivered (encoded in a propagated signal) over a communication medium of a network to the computer where it is executed. All of the functions may be performed on a special purpose computer, or using special-purpose hardware, such as coprocessors. The software may be implemented in a distributed manner in which different parts of the computation specified by the software are performed by different computers. Each such computer program is preferably stored on or downloaded to a storage media or device (e.g., solid state memory or media, or magnetic or optical media) readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer, for configuring and operating the computer when the storage media or device is read by the computer system to perform the procedures described herein. The inventive system may also be considered to be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium so configured causes a computer system to operate in a specific and predefined manner to perform the functions described herein.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, some of the steps described above may be order independent, and thus can be performed in an order different from that described.
It is to be understood that the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. For example, a number of the function steps described above may be performed in a different order without substantially affecting overall processing. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5088034 | Ihara et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5151991 | Iwasawa et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5313584 | Tickner et al. | May 1994 | A |
5347639 | Rechtschaffen et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5367619 | Dipaolo et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5446915 | Pierce | Aug 1995 | A |
5475842 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475843 | Halviatti et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5546576 | Cochrane et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574898 | Leblang et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588150 | Lin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600833 | Senn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619692 | Malkemus et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632022 | Warren et al. | May 1997 | A |
5678044 | Pastilha et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682537 | Davies et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5706509 | Man-Hak Tso | Jan 1998 | A |
5712971 | Stanfill et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5734886 | Grosse et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5752196 | Ahvenainen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768564 | Andrews et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799149 | Brenner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5819021 | Stanfill et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5870743 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5901353 | Pentikainen | May 1999 | A |
5909681 | Passera et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930723 | Heiskari et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935216 | Benner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956074 | Gautam et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966072 | Stanfill et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999729 | Tabloski, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031993 | Andrews et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6077313 | Ruf | Jun 2000 | A |
6205465 | Schoeing et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6253371 | Iwasawa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266804 | Isman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295518 | McLain et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311265 | Beckerle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330008 | Razdow et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345267 | Lohman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6415286 | Passera et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6453464 | Sullivan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6615203 | Lin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625593 | Leung et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6694306 | Nishizawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6785668 | Polo et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6915290 | Bestgen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7047232 | Serrano | May 2006 | B1 |
7080062 | Leung et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7111019 | Nishizawa | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7133861 | Day et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7164422 | Wholey, III et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167850 | Stanfill | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7249120 | Bruno et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7359922 | Young-Lai et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7464084 | Huang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7584205 | Stanfill et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7664730 | Ziauddin et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7856462 | Huang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7945562 | Ahmed et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953891 | Blaszczak et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8122088 | Banatwala | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8412746 | Fox et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8538985 | Betawadkar-Norwood et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8875145 | Atterbury et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20030120682 | Bestgen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050108209 | Beyer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050278152 | Blaszczak | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060095466 | Stevens et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060265362 | Bradford | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294150 | Stanfill et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070067274 | Han et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070186036 | Bittner | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070271381 | Wholey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080049022 | Sherb et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052299 | Shinke et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080151749 | Kawamura | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080256014 | Gould et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270646 | Wong | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090083313 | Stanfill et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090125887 | Kahlon et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090222404 | Dolin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225082 | Hargrove et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254774 | Chamdani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100005077 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057695 | Kirovski | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100211953 | Wakeling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110010358 | Zane | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029571 | Aggarwal et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110072319 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110246448 | Tatemura et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276789 | Chambers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120246158 | Ke et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140019949 | Craymer | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032617 | Stanfill | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140280037 | Petride et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2259362 | Jan 1998 | CA |
1786950 | Jun 2006 | CN |
1790324 | Jun 2006 | CN |
0421408 | Apr 1991 | EP |
2110761 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2251785 | Nov 2010 | EP |
944887 | Jul 1997 | FI |
945495 | Sep 1997 | FI |
951270 | Oct 1997 | FI |
3-126169 | May 1991 | JP |
8-16429 | Jan 1996 | JP |
10-232875 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-340276 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-514116 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000148699 | May 2000 | JP |
2003-505766 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-099441 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2006-236360 | Sep 2006 | JP |
WO 9723826 | Jul 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Flat file database http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flat—file—database&oldid=336589178 as of Jan. 8, 2010. |
Torrent Technical White Paper, “Orchestrator for the SAS System—Delivering Scalability and Performance to SAS Applications,” pp. 1-30. |
Forrester Research's Ellen Carney Names Compact Solutions Among “Hot Insurance Tech Companies—2009”, Jun. 29, 2009. |
“Relational algebra”, http/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational—algebra, Feb. 5, 2010. |
Levy et al., “Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions”, Proceedings of the 22nd VLDB Conference, Mumbai (Bombay), India, pp. 251-262, 1996. |
Graefe, “Encapsulation of Parallelism in the Volcano Query Processing System”, ACM, pp. 102-111, 1990. |
DeWitt et al., “Parallel Database Systems: The Future of High Performance Database Systems”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 85-98, Jun. 1992. |
Mackert et al., “R* Optimizer Validation and Performance Evaluation for Distributed Queries”, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Kyoto, pp. 149-159, Aug. 1986. |
Chamberlin et al., “A History of Evaluation of System R”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 632-646, Oct. 1981. |
Aho et al., “Universality of Data Retrieval Languages”, ACM, pp. 110-120. 1979. |
Selinger et al., “Access Path Selection in a Relational Database Management System”, ACM, pp. 23-34, 1979. |
Afrati et al., “Performance Considerations on a Random Graph Model for Parellel Processing”, Informatique Theorique et Applications, vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 367-388, (1993). |
Apers et al., “PRISMA/DB: A Parallel, Main Memory Relational DBMS”, IEEE, pp. 541-554 (1992). |
Bodin, Francois et al., “A User Level Program Transformation Tool,” ACM 1998, pp. 180-187. |
Boral et al., “Prototyping Bubba: A Highly Parallel Database System”, IEEE, vol. 2, No. 1 pp. 4-24, (Mar. 1990). |
Braun, Peter, “Parallel Program Debugging Using Scalable Visualization”,IEEE, pp. 699-708 (1995). |
Canadian Office Action issued in application No. 2,2360,286, dated Jul. 27, 2005, 3 pages. |
DeWitt et al., “The Gamma Database Machine Project”, IEEE, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 44-62, (Mar. 1990). |
Graefe et al., “Encapsulation of Parallelism and Architecture Independence in Extensible Database Query Execution”, IEEE, vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 749-764 (Aug. 1993). |
Graefe, Goetze “Volcano—An Extensible and Parellel Query Evaluation System”, IEEE, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 120-135 (Feb. 1994). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, Patent Cooperation Treaty, issued in PCT application No. PCT/US2000/00934, mailed Jan. 4, 2011, 5 pages. |
Li et al., “Load Balancing Problems for Multiclass Jobs in Distributed/Parellel Computer Systems”, IEEE, vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 322-332, (Mar. 1998). |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection issued in Japanese Application No. 2000-594025, mailed Mar. 29, 2005, 3 pages. |
Rim et al., “An Efficient Dynamic Load Balancing Using the Dimension Exchange Method for Balancing Quantized Loads on Hypercube Multiprocessors”, IEEE, pp. 708-712 (1999). |
Stanfill, Craig, “Massively Parallel Information Retrieval for Wide Area Information Servers”, IEEE, pp. 679-682 (1991). |
Stanfill, Craig, “The Marriage of Parallel Computing and Information Retrieval”, IEEE, (2003). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, Patent Cooperation Treaty, issued in PCT application No. PCT/US2011/021260, mailed Apr. 18, 2011, 12 pages. |
Josifovski, Vanja, et al., “Optimizing Queries in Distributed and Composable Mediators.” Cooperative Information Systems, 1999. COOPIS '99 Proceedinngs, 1999 I FCIS International Conference in Ediburgh, UK Sep. 2-4, 1999. Sep. 2, 1999, pp. 291-302. |
Adamos, Panayiotis, et al., “Architectural Principles of the ‘Streamonas’ Data Stream Management System and Performance Evaluation based on the Linear Road Benchmark.” 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Dec. 12, 2008, pp. 643-646. |
Seshadri, Sangeetha, et al., “Optimizing Multiple Queries in Distributed Data Stream Systems.” Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW '06), Apr. 3, 2006, 6 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2012/035762, mailed Feb. 19, 2013, 14 pages. |
Tjan, Bosco S., et al., “A Data-Flow Graphical User Interface for Querying a Scientific Database,” 12602 Proceedings 1993 Symposium on Visual Languages, Aug. 24-27, 1993, 6 pages. |
Japanese Office Action, with English translation, JP Application No. 2012-549105, mailed Apr. 22, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2011/021260, mailed May 24, 2012 (28 pages). |
Chinese Office Action (with English Translation) issued in application No. 201180014176.7, on Jan. 7, 2015, 24 pages. |
Cimitile et al., “Incremental migration strategies: Data flow analysis for wrapping,” IEEE Comput. Soc. US., pp. 59-68 Oct. 12, 1998, XP10309754. |
Japanese Office Action, with English translation, JP 2012-549105, mailed Mar. 25, 2015. |
Josifovski, Vanja, et al., “Optimizing Queries in Distributed and Composable Mediators.” Cooperative Information Systems, 1999. COOPIS '99 Proceedings, 1999 I FCIS International Conference in Ediburgh, UK Sep. 2-4, 1999. Sep. 2, 1999, pp. 291-302. |
Garcia-Molina et al., “Database Systems The Complete Book Second Edition—Chapter 16—The Query Compiler,” Pearson Prentice Hall, XP055315926, Jun. 15, 2008. |
Ozsu et al., “Principles of Distributed Database Systems—Chapter 9—Multidatabase Query Processing”, Principles of Distributed Database Systems: Third Edition, Springer New York, NY XP055267246, Mar. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,643, filed Feb. 23, 2015, Managing Data Queries. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/746,188, filed Jun. 22, 2015, Processing Queries Containing a Union-Type Operation. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/563,066, filed Dec. 8, 2014, Source Code Translation. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/752,094, filed Jun. 26, 2015, Querying a Data Source on a Network. |
Transaction History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,823, Jul. 11, 2013, 2 pages. |
Transaction History, U.S. Appl. No. 09/229,849, Jul. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110179014 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |