Managing request routing information utilizing performance information

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9172674
  • Patent Number
    9,172,674
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 20, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 27, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for managing requesting routing functionality associated with resource requests for one or more resources associated with a content provider are provided. The request routing functionality can correspond to the processing of domain name service (“DNS”) requests for resources by computing devices and the resolution of the DNS requests by the identification of a network address of a computing device that will provide the requested resources. Based on the processing resource requests initiated by a client computing device, a CDN service provider can obtain performance information from client computing devices and correlate the performance information into a prioritized list for classes of client computing devices. The prioritized list can be utilized in resolving subsequent DNS queries.
Description
BACKGROUND

Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.


Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.


With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.


Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of requested content, such as Web pages or resources identified in Web pages, through the utilization of a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider. A CDN service provider typically maintains a number of computing devices in a communication network that can maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content from the CDN service provider's computing devices.


As with content providers, CDN service providers are also generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, CDN service providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment including a number of client computing devices, a content provider, and a content delivery network service provider;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the registration of a content provider with a CDN service provider;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation of resource requests by a client computing device;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation of DNS queries by a client computing device to a CDN service provider;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation of content requests to the CDN service provider;



FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the processing of performance information by a client computing device;



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the processing of subsequent DNS queries by client computing devices in accordance with prioritized information;



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrative of a client computing device performance routine implemented by a CDN service provider; and



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrative of a request routing processing routine implemented by a service provider.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to managing requesting routing functionality associated with resource requests for one or more resources associated with a content provider. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the management and processing request routing functionality by a service provider, such as a domain name service (“DNS”) service provider or a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider, on behalf of a content provider.


Illustratively, in one embodiment, the request routing functionality can correspond to the processing of DNS requests for resources by computing devices and the resolution of the DNS requests by the identification of a network address of a computing device that will provide the requested resources. Based on the processing of DNS queries initiated by a client computing devices from networks, a service provider can correlate performance information for the network. In one embodiment, the performance information may be obtained by the same service provider. For example, a CDN service provider may collect performance information that is used by the same CDN service provider. In another embodiment, the performance information may be obtained by a service provider different from the service provider utilizing the collected performance information. For example, a CDN service provider may facilitate that collection of performance information that is then provided to a DNS service provider. The service provider (e.g., a CND service provider or DNS service provider) can then utilize the correlated CDN performance information to process subsequent resource requests.


Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting. For example, the present disclosure may be described with regard to request routing services provided by a service provider, such as a CDN service provider or DNS service provider, that may or may not provide additional services and functionality including network-based storage services, caching services, application hosting, or other services. Accordingly, use of the term “service provider” is not intended to be limited to any particular type of service provider, whether discussed or described in examples. Accordingly, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that a service provider need not provide all, or any, of the additional services or functionality that may be associated with some service providers, such as a CDN service provider.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment 100 for the managing registration of content provider with a service provider, such as a CDN service provider, and subsequent processing of at least a portion of content requests on behalf of the content provider. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 includes a number of client computing devices 102 (generally referred to as clients) for requesting content from a content provider, a network storage provider 110, or a CDN service provider 106. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a wide variety of computing devices including personal computing devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices, terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices, various electronic devices and appliances and the like. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 include necessary hardware and software components for establishing communications over a communication network 108, such as a wide area network or local area network. For example, the client computing devices 102 may be equipped with networking equipment and browser software applications that facilitate communications via the Internet or an intranet.


Illustratively, at least some of the client computing devices 102 utilize a DNS resolver component 108, such as a DNS Name server, that receives DNS queries from a client computing device 102 and then generates the DNS queries attributed to the client computing device, or on behalf of the client computing device. In one embodiment, the DNS resolver component 108 may be a local DNS component provided by an enterprise network to which the client computing device 102 belongs. In another embodiment, the local DNS resolver component 108 may be provided by an Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) that provides the communication network connection to the client computing device 102. In embodiments in which the client computing devices 102 utilize a DNS resolver component 108, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the DNS queries generated on behalf of the client computing devices would be associated with the IP address of the DNS resolver component 108 in accordance with a traditional networking protocols.


The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 110. The content provider 104 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a content provider. Specifically, the content provider 104 can include a web server component 112 corresponding to one or more server computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for content (such as Web pages) from the client computing devices 102. The content provider 104 can further include an origin server component 114 and associated storage component 116 corresponding to one or more computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for network resources. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 104 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources and the like. Additionally, although the origin server component 114 and associated storage component 116 are logically associated with the content provider 104, the origin server component 114 and associated storage components 116 may be geographically distributed throughout the communication network 108 in a manner to best serve various demographics of client computing devices 102.


Although not illustrated in FIG. 1, the content provider 104 can be associated with a number of additional or supplement components to facilitate interaction with client computing devices 102 or service providers. For example, a content provider 104 may maintain one or more DNS name server components that are operative to receive DNS queries related to registered domain names associated with the content provider 104. The one or more DNS name servers can be authoritative to resolve client computing device DNS queries corresponding to the registered domain names of the content provider 104. The content provider 104 can also maintain additional storage components, such as proxy servers, or utilize network storage service providers to maintain at least a portion of the content/resources provided to the client computing devices 102.


With continued reference to FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 can further include a service provider, generally referred to as the CDN service provider 106, in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 and the content provider 104 via the communication network 110. The CDN service provider 106 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a service provider. Specifically, the CDN service provider 106 can include a number of Point of Presence (“POP”) locations 118, 124 that correspond to nodes on the communication network 110. Each POP 118, 124 includes a DNS component 120, 126 made up of a number of DNS server computing devices for resolving DNS queries from the client computers 102. Each POP 118, 124 also optionally includes a resource cache component 122, 128 made up of a number of cache server computing devices for storing resources from content providers or network storage providers and transmitting various requested resources to various client computers 102. The DNS components 120, 126 and the resource cache components 122, 128 may further include additional software and/or hardware components that facilitate communications including, but not limited, load balancing or load sharing software/hardware components.


Still further, the CDN service provider 106 can include additional data stores for managing requesting routing information. Specifically, in an illustrative embodiment, the CDN service provider 106 can include a client performance data store 130 for maintaining information correlating performance information between client computing device 102 identifiers and various components associated with the CDN service provider 106. Although the client performance data store 130 is illustrated as single, centrally located data stores, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the data store may be distributed among several data stores or be maintained, at least in part, among the POPs 118, 124.


The content delivery environment can further include a performance processing application 132 for processing the collected performance information and correlating the performance information. Illustratively, the performance processing application 132 can utilize the processed performance information to generated prioritized request routing processing information for at least a subset of DNS server components. Although the performance processing application 132 is illustrated as a single application, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the performance processing application 132 may be implemented in a distributed manner. Additionally, the DNS performance processing application 132 may be implemented as a stand-alone service hosted on a computing device or in a virtualized environment. Still further, the performance processing application 132 can also be implemented as part of a CDN service provider 106 or other service provider, such as a DNS service provider.


In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 120, 126 and resource cache component 122, 128 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the POPs 118, 124 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as logically associated with the CDN service provider 106, the POPs will be geographically distributed throughout the communication network 110 in a manner to best serve various demographics of client computing devices 102. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the CDN service provider 106 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, and the like. Even further, the components of the CDN service provider 106 can be managed by the same or different entities. One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the components and configurations provided in FIG. 1 are illustrative in nature. Accordingly, additional or alternative components and/or configurations, especially regarding the additional components, systems and subsystems for facilitating communications may be utilized.


With continued reference to FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 can further include a different service provider, generally referred to as the DNS service provider 136, in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102, the content provider 104, and the CDN service provider 106 via the communication network 110. The DNS service provider 136 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a service provider. Specifically, the DNS service provider 136 can include one or more DNS components 138 made up of a number of DNS server computing devices for resolving DNS queries from the client computers 102. Illustratively, the DNS service provider 136 would not necessarily include any additional functionality and may provide DNS request routing service in lieu of any DNS request routing functionality provided by another service provider, such as a DNS service provider 106.


With reference now to FIGS. 2-6, the interaction between various components of the content delivery environment 100 of FIG. 1 will be illustrated. For purposes of the example, however, the illustration has been simplified such that many of the components utilized to facilitate communications are not shown. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that such components can be utilized and that additional interactions would accordingly occur without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.


With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative interaction for the optional registration of a content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106 for hosting content on behalf of the content provider 104 will be described. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the CDN service provider content registration process begins with registration of the content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106. In an illustrative embodiment, the content provider 104 utilizes a registration application program interface (“API”) to register with the CDN service provider 106 such that the CDN service provider 106 can provide content on behalf of the content provider 104, or at least perform the processes described herein. Illustratively, the registration API can include the identification of the origin server 114 of the content provider 104 that may provide requested resources to the CDN service provider 106. In addition or alternatively, the registration API can include the content to be stored by the CDN service provider 106 on behalf of the content provider 104. Additionally, the content provider 104 can specify one or more network storage providers (not illustrated) that may act as an origin server for the content provider 104.


With continued reference to FIG. 2, upon receiving the registration API, the CDN service provider 106 obtains the registration information and generates, or otherwise obtains, executable code and embedded resource identifiers that will be utilized in the collection of performance information. In an illustrative embodiment, and as will be explained in greater detail below, the executable code and embedded resource identifiers correspond to data or instructions that are processed by the client computing devices 102 to cause the client computing devices 102 to request specific resources from the CDN service provider 106. The request for specific resources from the CDN service provider 106 will result in the collection of performance information associated with processing resource requests. As will be explained in greater detail below, the collected performance information will be correlated with identifiers and utilized to generate prioritized lists for resolving subsequent DNS queries. Illustratively, the requesting of content corresponding to the embedded resource identifier provided by the CDN service provider 106 may not result in the transmittal of actual content by the CDN service provider 106.


The CDN service provider 106 returns the executable code and embedded resource identifiers to the content provider 104 along with any additional information. In turn, the content provider 104 can then store the executable code and embedded resource identifiers for embedding in requested content or otherwise embed (or associate) the embedded resource identifiers with requested content (such as Web page markup language). In an illustrative embodiment, the executable code and embedded resource identifiers can be applicable to multiple content providers 104. Alternatively, the executable code and embedded resource identifiers can be unique to each particular content provider 104. Still further, the CDN service provider 106 may provide additional logic to the content providers 104 that controls the circumstances and/or methodologies for embedding the embedded resource identifiers into content. For example, the CDN service provider 106 can include instructions (or executable code) that defines that the type of content (e.g., specific Web pages) for which the embedded resource identifiers will apply.


With reference now to FIG. 3, after completion of the registration and embedding processes illustrated in FIG. 2, a client computing device 102 generates a content request that is received and processed by the content provider 104, such as through the Web server 110. In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the request for content can be in accordance with common network protocols, such as the hypertext transfer protocol (“HTTP”). Upon receipt of the content request, the content provider identifies the appropriate responsive content. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing device 102 via the processing of information, such as hypertext markup language (“HTML”), extensible markup language (“XML”), and the like. The requested content can also include a number of embedded resource identifiers that corresponds to resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content. The embedded resources can correspond to multi-media content, such as images, videos, text, etc. that will be processed by the client computing devices 102 and rendered on output device.


Additionally, in some embodiments, the requested content will also include the additional embedded resource identifiers, instructions, executable code or logic previously provided by the CDN service provider 106 (FIG. 2). Illustratively, the additional embedded resource identifiers, instructions, executable code or logic can be utilized by the client computing device 102, content provider and CDN service provider 106 to obtaining various aspects of performance monitoring information. In an illustrative embodiment, the embedded resource identifiers, instructions, executable code or logic previously provided by the CDN service provider 106 can be arranged in a manner such that it is processed by the client computing device 102 prior to processing any other of the content in the requested content or processed in the earlier stages of the processing of the requested content, as allowed. Alternatively, the embedded resource embedded resource identifiers, instructions, executable code or logic previously provided by the CDN service provider 106 can also be arranged such that it is processed after all any other embedded resources are process so as to mitigate any type of interference or delay in the processing of other embedded resources/identifiers.


In other embodiments, one or more additional embedded resource identifiers are included in the requested resource to allow the content provider 104 to collect performance monitoring information related to the processing of requests from one or more client computing devices 102. In one aspect, one or more computing devices associated with the content provider 104 can conduct measurements or record data that measures request routing performance between the client computing devices 102, or groups of client computing device 102. In some embodiments, the computing devices can return some type of confirmation to the client computing device 102 or a specific resource. In other embodiments, the client computing device 102 may not receive any type of content, so the confirmation may include no additional content or some type of null content. The content provider 104 then measures the performance information corresponding to the processing of the resource request.


Generally, the identification of the embedded resources provided by the content provider 104 will be in the form of embedded resource identifiers that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). For purposes of an illustrative example, the URL can identify a domain of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com) or CDN service provider 106 (e.g., CDNserviceprovider), a name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the identified domain could correspond to third parties as well. By way of an illustrative example, the URLs of the embedded resource have the form of:


http://www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


or


http://www.CDNserviceprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


Additionally, in an illustrative embodiment, the embedded resource previously provided by the CDN service provider 106 will also be in the form of a resource identifier (e.g., URLs) that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. For purposes of an illustrative example, the URL can identify a domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., CDNserviceprovider.com), a name of a resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). As will be explained in greater detail, the embedded resource previously provided by the CDN service provider 106 will identify a special resource such that a request for the special resource may not result in the delivery of an actual resource to the requesting client computing device 102. In this illustrative example, the URLs of the embedded resource have the form of:


http://www.CDNserviceprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


With reference now to FIG. 4, upon receipt of the requested content, including the embedded resource identifiers, instructions, executable code or logic previously provided by the CDN service provider 106, the client computing device 102 processes the received information in a manner that causes the client computing device 102 to request one or more embedded resources, including the embedded resource previously provided by the CDN service provider 106 from the CDN service provider 106. As illustrated in FIG. 4, in accordance with traditional communication protocols, the client computing device 102 would first transmit a DNS query through its DNS resolver 108 to request an IP address of a computing device corresponding to the unique identifier provided by the CDN service provider 106. In accordance with traditional request routing principles, the DNS query would be received by the DNS resolver 108 and then transmitted on behalf of the requesting client computing device 102.


By way of example, in accordance with traditional DNS request routing principles, a DNS query for the URL, http://www.CDNserviceprovider.com/path/resource.xxx, would first include the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the URL to the DNS resolver 108. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated. After partially resolving the modified URL according to the “.” and “com” portions of the URL, the DNS resolver 108 then issues another DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of the DNS server corresponding to the “.CDNserviceprovider” portion of the URL, as illustrated in FIG. 4, illustrative as the DNS server component 120 of POP 118.


The receiving DNS server component 120 obtains the DNS query from the DNS resolver component 108 and processes the query. In accordance with traditional networking principles, because the DNS server component 120 is authoritative for the URL, the DNS server component 120 provides the DNS resolver 108 with the identification of an IP address that can provide the requested content, such as a resource cache component 122 of the POP 118.


Turning now to FIG. 5, upon receipt of the resolved DNS query, the client computing device 102 transmits a request for the content to the IP address corresponding to a resource cache component or storage component, including the embedded resource provided by the CDN service provider 106. In accordance with an embodiment utilizing the hypertext transfer protocol (“HTTP”), the request of a resource can correspond to a GET request transmitted by the client computing device 102 to an IP address associated with CDN service provider 106. The content request is received and processed by the corresponding resource cache component 122 (FIG. 1) and storage component. In one aspect, the client computing device 102 can conduct measurements or record data that measures request routing performance between the client computing devices 102 or groups of client computing device 102 associated with particular DNS nameserver components. In some embodiments, the resource cache component 122 can return some type of confirmation to the client computing device 102 or a specific resource. As previously described, in an illustrative embodiment, the client computing device 102 may not receive any type of content, so the confirmation may include no additional content or some type of null content. The client computing device 102 then measures the performance information corresponding to the processing of the resource request by the CDN service provider 106.


In addition to the collection of performance monitoring information by the client computing devices 102, as illustrated in FIG. 5, other techniques for collecting performance information may be utilized. For example, as described above, one or more content providers 104 may be configured to measure performance based on received requests from client computing devices 102 and transmitting the requested resource. In another example, an intermediary application may obtain the initial request from the client computing device 102 and redirect the request to different POPs. In these embodiments, the client computing device 102 may not actively participate in the collection or transmittal of the performance information.


Turning now to FIG. 6, the client computing device 102 or other component transmits the collected performance information to the performance processing application 132. The performance information can be maintained in the client performance data store 130. Illustratively, the performance processing application 132 can the process the information to generate prioritized lists that determines the best performance for a class of computing devices, based on latency information. In one embodiment, the performance processing information for a particular service provider POP can be attributed to performance attributable to POPs associated with another service provider. For example, if a CDN service provider 106 and another service provider (e.g., a network storage service provider) maintain servers in the same POP or POPs sharing similar geographic or topological attributes (e.g., topologically nearby), the performance information associated with the CDN service provider 106 can be utilized by DNS nameserver components. The association of destinations to known POP locations can be generally referred to as collocation.


By way of illustrative example, a class of client computing devices 102 can correspond to all client computing devices 102 associated with a particular DNS resolver component 108 or network service provider. Illustratively, because the performance measurement information was associated between individual client computing devices and POPs, the performance processing application 132 can collect performance information from a set of client computing devices 102 in a class. Accordingly, the performance processing application 132 can then utilize additional statistical processing techniques, such as averaging, interpolation, extrapolation, and the like to determine performance information for the class of client computing devices. The performance information can be distributed.


With reference to FIG. 7, a service provider, such as the DNS service provider 136 or CDN service provider 106, may subsequently obtain DNS queries from one or more client computing devices 102. Illustratively, the DNS service provider 136 attempts to resolve the DNS query by associating the client computing device 102 to the prioritized list of performance information associated with the classes of client computing devices. If prioritized information is available, the DNS service provider 136 resolves the request utilizing the prioritize information. Illustratively, the DNS service provider 136 can determine whether the destination of the DNS query is collocated with the prioritized list for the class of computing device. For example, the DNS service provider 136 can determine whether the destination corresponds to a POP identified in the prioritized information. If so, the prioritized information may be utilized to resolve the DNS queries by identifying the POPs that have the least amount of latency. Additionally, the DNS service provider 136 may conduct some type of health check to determine whether the DNS nameserver components included in the prioritized list are available to process requests. The health check information can determine absolute availability. Alternatively, the health check information can consider additional information such as load, resource utilization, and the like.


In some embodiments, if prioritized information is not available, then CDN service provider 106 can utilize alternative approaches for resolving the DNS query. In one aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize geographic lookup information, such as associated with a client network address (e.g., IP address). In still another aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize location information, such as regional information, based on which DNS nameserver receives the DNS query from the client computing device 102.


With reference now to FIG. 8 one embodiment of a routine 800 implemented by the CDN service provider 106 for correlating client identifiers with other information will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 800 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 800 has been logically associated as being generally performed by the CDN service provider 106, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be construed as limiting. One skilled in the relevant are will appreciate that aspects of routine 800 may be implemented by other components, such as the components associated with the content provider 104.


At block 802, the CDN service provider 106 obtains a request for an embedded resource. As previously described, in an illustrative embodiment, the embedded resource may correspond to one of several embedded resources provided by a content provider 104 (FIG. 1) in response to an initial content request from a client computing device. The embedded resource can be in the form of a URL that results in the generation of the request by the client computing device 102 to the CDN service provider 106. At block 804, the CDN service provider 106 processes the request. As previously described, processing the request for the resource can include generating a confirmation message, an error message, a null value or returning a special image or file. For example, the CDN service provider 106 processes can return an image that cannot be displayed on a screen. In another example, the CDN service provider 106 processes may simply generate a response that indicates to a client computing device 102 that the request was received and processed.


Subsequent to the processing of the resource, at block 806, the CDN service provider 106 obtains performance information associated with processing the resource request. For example, the CDN service provider 106 can obtain latency information. In one embodiment, the client computing device 102 may be configured with a software application, software module or other functionality that facilitates the reporting of the performance information. In another embodiment, the client computing device 102 may execute code included in the content, such as scripts, that facilitates the collection and transmittal of the collected performance information.


At block 808, the CDN service provider 106 processes the collected performance information to generate prioritized list for a class of computing devices 102. In one embodiment, classes of computing devices may be organized according to a common DNS resolver, partially matching network address portions, utilizing of embedded identifiers, utilizing of tracking information (e.g., cookies), and the like. Illustratively, for each class, the CDN service provider 106 identifies which POP associated with the client computing device experiences the least amount of latency. Accordingly, individual client computing devices or client computing devices from the same class can repeat the transmission of requests or collection of performance information to a set of POPs provided by the CDN service provider 106.


As previously discussed, because the performance measurement information was associated between individual client computing devices and POPs, the performance processing application 132 can collect performance information from a set of client computing devices 102 in a class. Accordingly, the performance processing application 132 can then utilize additional statistical processing techniques, such as averaging, interpolation, extrapolation, and the like to determine performance information for the class of client computing devices. The performance information can be distributed. In other embodiments, the generation of the prioritized list can also incorporate weighting schemas that can factor service levels, reliability, and the like. The resulting prioritized lists can be stored, such as in the client performance data store 130. Additionally, the prioritized lists can be distributed to various POPs for utilization. At block 810, the routine 800 terminates.


With reference now to FIG. 9, one embodiment of a request routing routine 900 for routing information based on mapped client computing device 102 identifiers and DNS resolver 108 identifiers will be described. Specifically, a service provider, such as the DNS service provider 136 or CDN service provider 106, can utilize correlated client computing device identifier information, such as correlated IP address information, to optimize request routing processing. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 900 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the DNS service provider 136 or CDN service provider 106. Additionally, routine 900 may be implemented by a combination of components from the DNS service provider 136 and CDN service provider 106 in embodiments in which both service providers share common control or ownership. Accordingly, routine 900 has been logically associated as being performed by the DNS service provider 136.


At a block 902, a DNS service provider 136 receives a DNS query corresponding to a requested resource from a client computing device 102, which may be transmitted via a DNS resolver 108. At block 904, the DNS service provider 136 determines a class for the client computing device 102 transmitting the request. Illustratively, the determination of class can be based on specific DNS resolver components 108 utilized to transmit the DNS request. In another embodiment, the DNS service provider 136 determines a class by matching at least portions of a network address that may be associated with an identifiable network, such as a network utilizing a common network service provider. In still a further embodiment, the determination of class can be based on additional identifier, such as embedded identifiers in the DNS portion of the URL. At block 906, the DNS service provider 136 attempts to identify whether prioritized list information previously generated by the CDN service provider 106 (FIG. 8) is available for the identified class.


At decision block 908, a test is conducted to determine whether the prioritized list information is available to be utilized to resolve the received DNS query. As previously discussed, the DNS service provider 136 can determine whether the destination of the DNS query is substantially collocated with the prioritized list for the class of computing device. For example, the DNS service provider 136 can determine whether the identified destination corresponds to a same geographic region for POP utilized in the generation of the prioritized information for the class of client computing device 102. The determination of collocation may be determined manually, such as by conducting one or more tests for different directions. Additionally, if so, the prioritized information may be utilized to resolve the DNS queries by identifying the POPs that have the least amount of latency.


If so, at block 910, the CDN service provider 106 attempts to resolve the DNS query by utilizing the prioritized list. Additionally, in some embodiments, the CDN service provider 106 may also attempt to conduct health check or availability check prior to resolving the request. If no prioritized list information exists or if the prioritized list information is not available to be used, at block 912, the CDN service provider 106 attempts to resolve the DNS query utilizing alternative methods. In one aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize geographic lookup information, such as associated with a client network address (e.g., IP address). In still another aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize location information based on which DNS nameserver receives the DNS query from the client computing device 102. At block 914, the routine 900 terminates.


It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that there are a number of ways to modify the routing information associated with requests from a class of client computing devices. It will further be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that the timing at which performance is monitored and updates to routing information are made can vary.


It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.


Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.


Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer readable storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms, and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.


It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed, direct a service provider computing system to perform operations comprising: providing, by the service provider computing system, at least one identifier for identifying an embedded resource provided by a content provider computing system;generating, by the service provider computing system, at least one list based, at least in part, on performance information associated with previous requests for the embedded resource, wherein a generated list identifies point of presence servers associated with a class of computing devices;obtaining, by the service provider computing system, a request for content from a client computing device responsive to the at least one identifier for the embedded resource provided by the content provider computing system;determining, by the service provider computing system, a class of client computing devices associated with the client computing device based, at least in part, on an address associated with the client computing device;determining, by the service provider computing system, whether a list of the at least one list is associated with the determined class of computing devices; if the list is determined to be associated with the determined class of computing devices, resolving, by the service provider computing system, the request for content from the client computing device by identifying at least one point of presence server associated with the determined class of client computing devices from the list; andif the list is determined to not be associated with the determined class of computing devices, resolving, by the service provider computing system, the request for content based, at least in part, on location information associated with the request.
  • 2. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium as recited in claim 1, wherein the performance information relates to latency information.
  • 3. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least one identifier corresponds to a uniform resource locator of the service provider computing system.
  • 4. A method for processing content comprising: obtaining, by a service provider computing system, performance information associated with processing of requests for resources from at least one class of client computing devices;generating at least one list based, at least in part, on the performance information, wherein a generated list identifies point of presence servers associated with a class of the at least one class of client computing devices;obtaining, by the service provider computing system, a domain name service request from a client computing device;determining, by the service provider computing system, a class of computing devices of the at least one class of client computing devices associated with the client computing device;determining, by the service provider computing system, whether a list is associated with the determined class of computing devices; if a list is determined to be associated with the determined class of computing devices, resolving, by the service provider computing system, the domain name service request by identifying at least one point of presence server associated with the determined class of client computing devices from the list; andif a list is not determined to be associated with the identified class of computing devices, resolving, by the service provider computing system, the domain name service request based, at least in part, on location information associated with the request.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 4 further comprising providing, by a service provider computing system, an identifier for identifying one or more the resources.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the at least one identifier corresponds to a uniform resource locator of at least one of a content provider computing system or the service provider computing system.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 4 further comprising conducting, by the service provider computing system, availability checking prior to resolving the domain name service request.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the determined class of computing device associated with the client computing device corresponds to an association of a domain name server resolver component.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the determined class of computing device associated with the client computing device corresponds to an association of at least a portion of a network address.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein obtaining the performance information associated with processing of a request for resources includes obtaining performance information from the client computing device executing code associated with an embedded resource identifier.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein obtaining the performance information associated with processing of a request for a resource includes obtaining performance information from a content provider computing system executing code associated with the embedded resource identifier.
  • 12. A computer-implemented system for processing content, the system comprising: an electronic data store configured to store performance information associated with at least one class of computing devices, wherein the performance information is associated with requests for content; anda computing system in communication with the electronic data store and comprising a processor, the processor configured to execute specific computer-executable instructions to at least: generate at least one list based, at least in part, on the performance information, wherein a generated list identifies point of presence servers associated with a class of the at least one class of computing devices;obtain a domain name service request from a client computing device;determine a class of computing devices of the at least one class of computing devices associated with the client computing device;determine whether a list is associated with the identified class of computing devices; if a list is determined to be associated with the determined class of computing devices, resolve the domain name service request by identifying at least one point of presence server associated with the determined class of client computing devices from the list; andif a list is determined not to be associated with the determined class of computing devices, resolve the domain name service request based at least in part on location information associated with the request.
  • 13. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the requests for content are associated with an identifier, wherein the identifier corresponds to a uniform resource locator of at least one of a service provider or a content provider.
  • 14. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the class of computing device corresponds to an association of a domain name server resolver component.
  • 15. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the class of computing device corresponds to an association of at least a portion of a network address.
  • 16. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to execute specific computer-executable instructions to at least conduct availability checking prior to resolving the domain name service request.
  • 17. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the performance information corresponds to latency information associated with processing the domain name service request.
  • 18. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the performance information is generated by a content provider.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/613,921, entitled MANAGING REQUEST ROUTING INFORMATION UTILIZING PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, and filed Mar. 21, 2012, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (705)
Number Name Date Kind
5341477 Pitkin et al. Aug 1994 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5852717 Bhide et al. Dec 1998 A
5892914 Pitts Apr 1999 A
5933811 Angles et al. Aug 1999 A
5974454 Apfel et al. Oct 1999 A
6016512 Huitema Jan 2000 A
6026452 Pitts Feb 2000 A
6052718 Gifford Apr 2000 A
6078960 Ballard Jun 2000 A
6085234 Pitts et al. Jul 2000 A
6098096 Tsirigotis et al. Aug 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6157942 Chu et al. Dec 2000 A
6167438 Yates et al. Dec 2000 A
6182111 Inohara et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185598 Farber et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205475 Pitts Mar 2001 B1
6223288 Byrne Apr 2001 B1
6275496 Burns et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286043 Cuomo et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286084 Wexler et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304913 Rune Oct 2001 B1
6351743 DeArdo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351775 Yu Feb 2002 B1
6363411 Dugan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366952 Pitts Apr 2002 B2
6374290 Scharber et al. Apr 2002 B1
6405252 Gupta et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411967 Van Renesse Jun 2002 B1
6415280 Farber et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430607 Kavner Aug 2002 B1
6438592 Killian Aug 2002 B1
6452925 Sistanizadeh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457047 Chandra et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459909 Bilcliff et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473804 Kaiser et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484143 Swildens et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505241 Pitts Jan 2003 B2
6529953 Van Renesse Mar 2003 B1
6553413 Lewin et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560610 Eatherton et al. May 2003 B1
6611873 Kanehara Aug 2003 B1
6643357 Lumsden Nov 2003 B2
6654807 Farber et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658462 Dutta Dec 2003 B1
6665706 Kenner et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678791 Jacobs et al. Jan 2004 B1
6694358 Swildens et al. Feb 2004 B1
6697805 Choquier et al. Feb 2004 B1
6724770 Van Renesse Apr 2004 B1
6732237 Jacobs et al. May 2004 B1
6754699 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B2
6754706 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760721 Chasen et al. Jul 2004 B1
6769031 Bero Jul 2004 B1
6782398 Bahl Aug 2004 B1
6785704 McCanne Aug 2004 B1
6795434 Kumar et al. Sep 2004 B1
6799214 Li Sep 2004 B1
6804706 Pitts Oct 2004 B2
6810291 Card et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810411 Coughlin et al. Oct 2004 B1
6829654 Jungck Dec 2004 B1
6874017 Inoue et al. Mar 2005 B1
6928467 Peng Aug 2005 B2
6928485 Krishnamurthy et al. Aug 2005 B1
6941562 Gao et al. Sep 2005 B2
6963850 Bezos et al. Nov 2005 B1
6976090 Ben-Shaul et al. Dec 2005 B2
6981017 Kasriel et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985945 Farhat et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986018 O'Rourke et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990526 Zhu Jan 2006 B1
6996616 Leighton et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003555 Jungck Feb 2006 B1
7006099 Gut et al. Feb 2006 B2
7007089 Freedman Feb 2006 B2
7010578 Lewin et al. Mar 2006 B1
7010598 Sitaraman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024466 Outten et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031445 Lumsden Apr 2006 B2
7032010 Swildens et al. Apr 2006 B1
7058706 Iyer et al. Jun 2006 B1
7058953 Willard et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065587 Huitema et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072982 Teodosiu et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076633 Tormasov et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082476 Cohen et al. Jul 2006 B1
7086061 Joshi et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092505 Allison et al. Aug 2006 B2
7092997 Kasriel et al. Aug 2006 B1
7096266 Lewin et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099936 Chase et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103645 Leighton et al. Sep 2006 B2
7117262 Bai et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133905 Dilley et al. Nov 2006 B2
7136922 Sundaram et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139821 Shah et al. Nov 2006 B1
7143169 Champagne et al. Nov 2006 B1
7143170 Swildens et al. Nov 2006 B2
7146560 Dang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149809 Barde et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152118 Anderson, IV et al. Dec 2006 B2
7174382 Ramanathan et al. Feb 2007 B2
7185063 Kasriel et al. Feb 2007 B1
7188214 Kasriel et al. Mar 2007 B1
7194522 Swildens et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200667 Teodosiu et al. Apr 2007 B2
7216170 Ludvig et al. May 2007 B2
7225254 Swildens et al. May 2007 B1
7228350 Hong et al. Jun 2007 B2
7228359 Monteiro Jun 2007 B1
7233978 Overton et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240100 Wein et al. Jul 2007 B1
7251675 Kamakura et al. Jul 2007 B1
7254626 Kommula et al. Aug 2007 B1
7254636 O'Toole, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7257581 Steele et al. Aug 2007 B1
7260598 Liskov et al. Aug 2007 B1
7269784 Kasriel et al. Sep 2007 B1
7274658 Bornstein et al. Sep 2007 B2
7289519 Liskov Oct 2007 B1
7293093 Leighton et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308499 Chavez Dec 2007 B2
7310686 Uysal Dec 2007 B2
7316648 Kelly et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320131 O'Toole, Jr. Jan 2008 B1
7321918 Burd et al. Jan 2008 B2
7363291 Page Apr 2008 B1
7373416 Kagan et al. May 2008 B2
7376736 Sundaram et al. May 2008 B2
7380078 Ikegaya et al. May 2008 B2
7398301 Hennessey et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406512 Swildens et al. Jul 2008 B2
7430610 Pace et al. Sep 2008 B2
7441045 Skene et al. Oct 2008 B2
7454500 Hsu et al. Nov 2008 B1
7461170 Taylor et al. Dec 2008 B1
7464142 Flurry et al. Dec 2008 B2
7478148 Neerdaels Jan 2009 B2
7492720 Pruthi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496651 Joshi Feb 2009 B1
7499998 Toebes et al. Mar 2009 B2
7502836 Menditto et al. Mar 2009 B1
7519720 Fishman et al. Apr 2009 B2
7543024 Holstege Jun 2009 B2
7548947 Kasriel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7552235 Chase et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565407 Hayball Jul 2009 B1
7573916 Bechtolsheim et al. Aug 2009 B1
7581009 Hsu et al. Aug 2009 B1
7594189 Walker et al. Sep 2009 B1
7596619 Leighton et al. Sep 2009 B2
7623460 Miyazaki Nov 2009 B2
7624169 Lisiecki et al. Nov 2009 B2
7631101 Sullivan et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640296 Fuchs et al. Dec 2009 B2
7650376 Blumenau Jan 2010 B1
7653700 Bahl et al. Jan 2010 B1
7653725 Yahiro et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657622 Douglis et al. Feb 2010 B1
7664879 Chan et al. Feb 2010 B2
7680897 Carter et al. Mar 2010 B1
7702724 Brydon et al. Apr 2010 B1
7706740 Collins et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707314 McCarthy et al. Apr 2010 B2
7711647 Gunaseelan et al. May 2010 B2
7711788 Lev Ran et al. May 2010 B2
7716367 Leighton et al. May 2010 B1
7725602 Liu et al. May 2010 B2
7730187 Raciborski et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739400 Lindbo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747720 Toebes et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756913 Day Jul 2010 B1
7756965 Joshi Jul 2010 B2
7757202 Dahlstedt et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761572 Auerbach Jul 2010 B1
7765304 Davis et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769823 Jenny et al. Aug 2010 B2
7773596 Marques Aug 2010 B1
7774342 Virdy Aug 2010 B1
7787380 Aggarwal et al. Aug 2010 B1
7792989 Toebes et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809597 Das et al. Oct 2010 B2
7813308 Reddy et al. Oct 2010 B2
7814229 Cabrera et al. Oct 2010 B1
7818454 Kim et al. Oct 2010 B2
7836177 Kasriel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7890612 Todd et al. Feb 2011 B2
7899899 Joshi Mar 2011 B2
7904875 Hegyi Mar 2011 B2
7912921 O'Rourke et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925782 Sivasubramanian et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930393 Baumback et al. Apr 2011 B1
7930402 Swildens et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930427 Josefsberg et al. Apr 2011 B2
7933988 Nasuto et al. Apr 2011 B2
7937477 Day et al. May 2011 B1
7945693 Farber et al. May 2011 B2
7949779 Farber et al. May 2011 B2
7958222 Pruitt et al. Jun 2011 B1
7958258 Yeung et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962597 Richardson et al. Jun 2011 B2
7966404 Hedin et al. Jun 2011 B2
7970816 Chess et al. Jun 2011 B2
7970940 Van De Ven et al. Jun 2011 B1
7979509 Malmskog et al. Jul 2011 B1
7991910 Richardson et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996533 Leighton et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996535 Auerbach Aug 2011 B2
8000724 Rayburn et al. Aug 2011 B1
8024441 Kommula et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028090 Richardson et al. Sep 2011 B2
8041809 Sundaram et al. Oct 2011 B2
8041818 Gupta et al. Oct 2011 B2
8065275 Eriksen et al. Nov 2011 B2
8069231 Schran et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073940 Richardson et al. Dec 2011 B1
8082348 Averbuj et al. Dec 2011 B1
8117306 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8122098 Richardson et al. Feb 2012 B1
8122124 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8135820 Richardson et al. Mar 2012 B2
8156243 Richardson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8190682 Paterson-Jones et al. May 2012 B2
8195837 Mccarthy et al. Jun 2012 B2
8224986 Liskov et al. Jul 2012 B1
8234403 Richardson et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239530 Sundaram et al. Aug 2012 B2
8250211 Swildens et al. Aug 2012 B2
8250219 Raciborski et al. Aug 2012 B2
8266288 Banerjee et al. Sep 2012 B2
8266327 Kumar et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280998 Joshi Oct 2012 B2
8281035 Farber et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291046 Farber et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291117 Eggleston et al. Oct 2012 B1
8301645 Crook Oct 2012 B1
8321568 Sivasubramanian et al. Nov 2012 B2
8402137 Sivasubramanian et al. Mar 2013 B2
8452874 Maccarthaigh et al. May 2013 B2
8468222 Sakata et al. Jun 2013 B2
8468245 Farber et al. Jun 2013 B2
8473613 Farber et al. Jun 2013 B2
8478903 Farber et al. Jul 2013 B2
8504721 Hsu et al. Aug 2013 B2
8510428 Joshi Aug 2013 B2
8521851 Richardson et al. Aug 2013 B1
8521908 Holmes et al. Aug 2013 B2
8527658 Holmes et al. Sep 2013 B2
8572208 Farber et al. Oct 2013 B2
8572210 Farber et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577992 Richardson et al. Nov 2013 B1
8589996 Ma et al. Nov 2013 B2
8615549 Knowles et al. Dec 2013 B2
8626950 Maccarthaigh et al. Jan 2014 B1
8639817 Sivasubramanian et al. Jan 2014 B2
8676918 Richardson et al. Mar 2014 B2
8683076 Farber et al. Mar 2014 B2
8688837 Richardson et al. Apr 2014 B1
8732309 Richardson et al. May 2014 B1
8756325 Sivasubramanian et al. Jun 2014 B2
8756341 Richardson et al. Jun 2014 B1
8782236 Marshall et al. Jul 2014 B1
8782279 Eggleston et al. Jul 2014 B2
8924528 Richardson et al. Dec 2014 B1
8930513 Richardson et al. Jan 2015 B1
8930544 Richardson et al. Jan 2015 B2
20010000811 May et al. May 2001 A1
20010032133 Moran Oct 2001 A1
20010034704 Farhat et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010049741 Skene et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010052016 Skene et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010056416 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Dec 2001 A1
20010056500 Farber et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002613 Freeman et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004846 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007413 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020048269 Hong et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049608 Hartsell et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049857 Farber et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052942 Swildens et al. May 2002 A1
20020062372 Hong et al. May 2002 A1
20020068554 Dusse Jun 2002 A1
20020069420 Russell et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078233 Biliris et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082858 Heddaya et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083118 Sim Jun 2002 A1
20020083148 Shaw et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087374 Boubez et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091786 Yamaguchi et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092026 Janniello et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099616 Sweldens Jul 2002 A1
20020099850 Farber et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020101836 Dorenbosch Aug 2002 A1
20020107944 Bai et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112049 Elnozahy et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116481 Lee Aug 2002 A1
20020116491 Boyd et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120782 Dillon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020124047 Gartner et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020124098 Shaw Sep 2002 A1
20020129123 Johnson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020135611 Deosaran et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138286 Engstrom Sep 2002 A1
20020138437 Lewin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143989 Huitema et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147770 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020147774 Lisiecki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150094 Cheng et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156911 Croman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161767 Shapiro et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163882 Bornstein et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020165912 Wenocur et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188722 Banerjee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198953 O'Rourke et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002484 Freedman Jan 2003 A1
20030009591 Hayball et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030026410 Lumsden Feb 2003 A1
20030028642 Agarwal et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030033283 Evans et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037139 Shteyn Feb 2003 A1
20030065739 Shnier Apr 2003 A1
20030074401 Connell et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030079027 Slocombe et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093523 Cranor et al. May 2003 A1
20030099202 Lear et al. May 2003 A1
20030101278 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. May 2003 A1
20030120741 Wu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030133554 Nykanen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135509 Davis et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140087 Lincoln et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145038 Tariq et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145066 Okada et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149581 Chaudhri et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163722 Anderson, IV Aug 2003 A1
20030172145 Nguyen Sep 2003 A1
20030172183 Anderson, IV et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172291 Judge et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174648 Wang et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182305 Balva et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182413 Allen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182447 Schilling Sep 2003 A1
20030187935 Agarwalla et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187970 Chase et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191822 Leighton et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200394 Ashmore et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204602 Hudson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030229682 Day Dec 2003 A1
20030233423 Dilley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233445 Levy et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233455 Leber et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236700 Arning et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010621 Afergan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019518 Abraham et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024841 Becker et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030620 Benjamin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034744 Karlsson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039798 Hotz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044731 Chen et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044791 Pouzzner Mar 2004 A1
20040059805 Dinker et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064501 Jan et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073596 Kloninger et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073707 Dillon Apr 2004 A1
20040073867 Kausik et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078468 Hedin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078487 Cernohous et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083283 Sundaram et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083307 Uysal Apr 2004 A1
20040117455 Kaminsky et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128344 Trossen Jul 2004 A1
20040128346 Melamed et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167981 Douglas et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167982 Cohen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172466 Douglas et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194085 Beaubien et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194102 Neerdaels Sep 2004 A1
20040203630 Wang Oct 2004 A1
20040205149 Dillon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205162 Parikh Oct 2004 A1
20040215823 Kleinfelter et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040221034 Kausik et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040249939 Amini et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249971 Klinker Dec 2004 A1
20040249975 Tuck et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254921 Cohen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267906 Truty Dec 2004 A1
20040267907 Gustafsson Dec 2004 A1
20050010653 McCanne Jan 2005 A1
20050021706 Maggi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021862 Schroeder et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027882 Sullivan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038967 Umbehocker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044270 Grove et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050102683 Branson et al. May 2005 A1
20050108169 Balasubramanian et al. May 2005 A1
20050108529 Juneau May 2005 A1
20050114296 Farber et al. May 2005 A1
20050117717 Lumsden Jun 2005 A1
20050132083 Raciborski et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157712 Rangarajan et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163168 Sheth et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168782 Kobashi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171959 Deforche et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188073 Nakamichi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192008 Desai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198334 Farber et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198571 Kramer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216569 Coppola et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216674 Robbin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050229119 Torvinen Oct 2005 A1
20050232165 Brawn et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050259672 Eduri Nov 2005 A1
20050262248 Jennings, III et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267991 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267992 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267993 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278259 Gunaseelan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283759 Peteanu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283784 Suzuki Dec 2005 A1
20060013158 Ahuja et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020596 Liu et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020684 Mukherjee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020714 Girouard et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020715 Jungck Jan 2006 A1
20060026067 Nicholas et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026154 Altinel et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036720 Faulk, Jr. Feb 2006 A1
20060036966 Yevdayev Feb 2006 A1
20060037037 Miranz Feb 2006 A1
20060039352 Karstens Feb 2006 A1
20060041614 Oe Feb 2006 A1
20060047787 Agarwal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047813 Aggarwal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059246 Grove Mar 2006 A1
20060063534 Kokkonen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064476 Decasper et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064500 Roth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074750 Clark et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075084 Lyon Apr 2006 A1
20060075139 Jungck Apr 2006 A1
20060083165 McLane et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085536 Meyer et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060112066 Hamzy May 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu et al. May 2006 A1
20060120385 Atchison et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129665 Toebes et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143293 Freedman Jun 2006 A1
20060149529 Nguyen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155823 Tran et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161541 Cencini Jul 2006 A1
20060168088 Leighton et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060179080 Meek et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184936 Abels et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190605 Franz et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193247 Naseh et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195866 Thukral Aug 2006 A1
20060218265 Farber et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218304 Mukherjee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060227740 McLaughlin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060227758 Rana et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060230137 Gare et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233155 Srivastava Oct 2006 A1
20060253546 Chang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253609 Andreev et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259581 Piersol Nov 2006 A1
20060259690 Vittal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259984 Juneau Nov 2006 A1
20060265497 Ohata et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265508 Angel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265516 Schilling Nov 2006 A1
20060265720 Cai et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271641 Stavrakos et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282522 Lewin et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005689 Leighton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005892 Mullender et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011267 Overton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014241 Banerjee et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021998 Laithwaite et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038729 Sullivan et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038994 Davis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041393 Westhead et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043859 Ruul Feb 2007 A1
20070050522 Grove et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050703 Lebel Mar 2007 A1
20070055764 Dilley et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061440 Sundaram et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076872 Juneau Apr 2007 A1
20070086429 Lawrence et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094361 Hoynowski et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101377 Six et al. May 2007 A1
20070118667 McCarthy et al. May 2007 A1
20070118668 McCarthy et al. May 2007 A1
20070134641 Lieu Jun 2007 A1
20070168517 Weller et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174426 Swildens et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174442 Sherman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174490 Choi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183342 Wong et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198982 Bolan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070204107 Greenfield et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208737 Li et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219795 Park et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220010 Ertugrul Sep 2007 A1
20070233705 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233706 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233846 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233884 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244964 Challenger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250467 Mesnik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250560 Wein et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250601 Amlekar et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250611 Bhogal et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253377 Janneteau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255843 Zubev Nov 2007 A1
20070263604 Tai Nov 2007 A1
20070266113 Koopmans et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266311 Westphal Nov 2007 A1
20070266333 Cossey et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270165 Poosala Nov 2007 A1
20070271375 Hwang Nov 2007 A1
20070271385 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280229 Kenney Dec 2007 A1
20070288588 Wein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005057 Ozzie et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008089 Bornstein et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025304 Venkataswami et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080037536 Padmanabhan et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046596 Afergan et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080065724 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065745 Leighton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071859 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071987 Karn et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080072264 Crayford Mar 2008 A1
20080082551 Farber et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086574 Raciborski et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103805 Shear et al. May 2008 A1
20080104268 Farber et al. May 2008 A1
20080114829 Button et al. May 2008 A1
20080134043 Georgis et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140800 Farber et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147866 Stolorz et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147873 Matsumoto Jun 2008 A1
20080155061 Afergan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155614 Cooper et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162667 Verma et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162821 Duran et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172488 Jawahar et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189437 Halley Aug 2008 A1
20080201332 Souders et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215718 Stolorz et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215730 Sundaram et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215735 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215750 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215755 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222281 Dilley et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222291 Weller et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222295 Robinson et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228574 Stewart et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228920 Souders et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235400 Slocombe et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080256175 Lee et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275772 Suryanarayana et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281946 Swildens et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281950 Wald et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288722 Lecoq et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080301670 Gouge et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319862 Golan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013063 Soman Jan 2009 A1
20090016236 Alcala et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029644 Sue et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031367 Sue Jan 2009 A1
20090031368 Ling Jan 2009 A1
20090031376 Riley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090049098 Pickelsimer et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090063704 Taylor et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070533 Elazary et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083228 Shatz et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086741 Zhang Apr 2009 A1
20090103707 McGary et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106381 Kasriel et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112703 Brown Apr 2009 A1
20090125934 Jones et al. May 2009 A1
20090132368 Cotter et al. May 2009 A1
20090132648 Swildens et al. May 2009 A1
20090144412 Ferguson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150926 Schlack Jun 2009 A1
20090157850 Gagliardi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158163 Stephens et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164331 Bishop et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177667 Ramos et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182815 Czechowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182945 Aviles et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187575 Dacosta Jul 2009 A1
20090204682 Jeyaseelan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210549 Hudson et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090233623 Johnson Sep 2009 A1
20090248786 Richardson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248852 Fuhrmann et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248893 Richardson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090249222 Schmidt et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259971 Rankine et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271577 Campana et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271730 Rose et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279444 Ravindran et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287750 Banavar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090307307 Igarashi Dec 2009 A1
20090327489 Swildens et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327517 Sivasubramanian et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327914 Adar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100005175 Swildens et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011061 Hudson et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011126 Hsu et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023601 Lewin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030662 Klein Feb 2010 A1
20100030914 Sparks et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100034470 Valencia-Campo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100036944 Douglis et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057894 Glasser Mar 2010 A1
20100070603 Moss et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082787 Kommula et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088367 Brown et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088405 Huang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100629 Raciborski et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111059 Bappu et al. May 2010 A1
20100115133 Joshi May 2010 A1
20100121953 Friedman et al. May 2010 A1
20100121981 Drako May 2010 A1
20100122069 Gonion May 2010 A1
20100125673 Richardson et al. May 2010 A1
20100125675 Richardson et al. May 2010 A1
20100131646 Drako May 2010 A1
20100138559 Sullivan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150155 Napierala Jun 2010 A1
20100161799 Maloo Jun 2010 A1
20100169392 Lev Ran et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100192225 Ma et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217801 Leighton et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100226372 Watanabe Sep 2010 A1
20100257024 Holmes et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100257266 Holmes et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100257566 Matila Oct 2010 A1
20100293296 Hsu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100293479 Rousso et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299427 Joshi Nov 2010 A1
20100299438 Zimmerman et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299439 McCarthy et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100312861 Kolhi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318508 Brawer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322255 Hao et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332595 Fullagar et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029598 Arnold et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040893 Karaoguz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110078000 Ma et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078230 Sepulveda Mar 2011 A1
20110087769 Holmes et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110096987 Morales et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110113467 Agarwal et al. May 2011 A1
20110153941 Spatscheck et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110191449 Swildens et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110191459 Joshi Aug 2011 A1
20110219120 Farber et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110219372 Agrawal et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238501 Almeida Sep 2011 A1
20110238793 Bedare et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110252142 Richardson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252143 Baumback et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276623 Girbal Nov 2011 A1
20110296053 Medved et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302304 Baumback et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120036238 Sundaram et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120066360 Ghosh Mar 2012 A1
20120124184 Sakata et al. May 2012 A1
20120131177 Brandt et al. May 2012 A1
20120166516 Simmons et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120169646 Berkes et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179839 Raciborski et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120198043 Hesketh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120233522 Barton et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233668 Leafe et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120303804 Sundaram et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120311648 Swildens et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120324089 Joshi Dec 2012 A1
20130041872 Aizman et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130086001 Bhogal et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130130221 Kortemeyer et al. May 2013 A1
20130198341 Kim Aug 2013 A1
20130212300 Eggleston et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227165 Liu Aug 2013 A1
20130246567 Green et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130268616 Sakata et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130318153 Sivasubramanian et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130339429 Richardson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130346567 Richardson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140040478 Hsu et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140075109 Richardson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140143320 Sivasubramanian et al. May 2014 A1
20140257891 Richardson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140325155 Marshall et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140365666 Richardson et al. Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
1422468 Jun 2003 CN
1605182 Apr 2005 CN
101189598 May 2008 CN
101460907 Jun 2009 CN
2008167 Dec 2008 EP
2001-0506093 May 2001 JP
2002-044137 Feb 2002 JP
2003-167810 Jun 2003 JP
2003-167813 Jun 2003 JP
2003-522358 Jul 2003 JP
2004-533738 Nov 2004 JP
2005-537687 Dec 2005 JP
2007-133896 May 2007 JP
2009-071538 Apr 2009 JP
2012-209623 Oct 2012 JP
WO 02069608 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2007007960 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007126837 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2010002603 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2012044587 Apr 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (99)
Entry
Canonical Name (CNAME) DNS Records, domainavenue.com, Feb. 1, 2001, XP055153783, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.domainavenue.com/cname.htm [retrieved on Nov. 18, 2014].
“Content delivery network”, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contentdelivery network&oldid=6010099 70, XP055153445, Mar. 24, 2008.
“Global Server Load Balancing with Serverlron,” Foundry Networks, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.foundrynet.com/pdf/an-global-server-load-bal.pdf, 7 pages.
“Grid Computing Solutions,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/grid, 3 pages.
“Grid Offerings,” Java.net, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Sungrid/OtherGridOfferings, 8 pages.
“Recent Advances Boost System Virtualization,” eWeek.com, retrieved from May 3, 2006, http://www.eWeek.com/article2/0,1895,1772626,00.asp, 5 pages.
“Scaleable Trust of Next Generation Management (STRONGMAN),” retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dsl/STRONGMAN/, 4 pages.
“Sun EDA Compute Ranch,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://sun.com/processors/ranch/brochure.pdf, 2 pages.
“Sun Microsystems Accelerates UltraSP ARC Processor Design Program With New Burlington, Mass. Compute Ranch,” Nov. 6, 2002, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2002-11/sunflash.20021106.3 .xml, 2 pages.
“Sun N1 Grid Engine 6,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/gridware/index.xml, 3 pages.
“Sun Opens New Processor Design Compute Ranch,” Nov. 30, 2001, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2001-11/sunflash.20011130.1.xml, 3 pages.
“The Softricity Desktop,” Softricity, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.softricity.com/products/, 3 pages.
“Xen—The Xen virtual Machine Monitor,” University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/, 2 pages.
“XenFaq,” retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq?action=print, 9 pages.
Abi, Issam, et al., “A Business Driven Management Framework for Utility Computing Environments,” Oct. 12, 2004, HP Laboratories Bristol, HPL-2004-171, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-171.pdf, 14 pages.
American Bar Association; Digital Signature Guidelines Tutorial [online]; Feb. 10, 2002 [retrieved on Mar. 2, 2010]; American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Information Security Committee; Retrieved from the internet: (URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20020210124615/www.abanet.org/scitech/ec/isc/dsg-tutorial.html; pp. 1-8.
Baglioni et al., “Preprocessing and Mining Web Log Data for Web Personalization”, LNAI 2829, 2003, pp. 237-249.
Barbir, A., et al., “Known Content Network (CN) Request-Routing Mechanisms”, Request for Comments 3568, [online], IETF, Jul. 2003, [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2013], Retrieved from the Internet: (URL: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3568.txt).
Bellovin, S., “Distributed Firewalls,” ;login;:37-39, Nov. 1999, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/-smb/papers/distfw. html, 10 pages, retrieved Nov. 11, 2005.
Blaze, M., “Using the KeyNote Trust Management System,” Mar. 1, 2001, from http://www.crypto.com/trustmgt/kn.html, 4 pages, retrieved May 17, 2006.
Brenton, C., “What is Egress Filtering and How Can I Implement It? —Egress Filtering v 0.2,” Feb. 29, 2000, SANS Institute, http://www.sans.org/infosecFAQ/firewall/egress.htm, 6 pages.
Byun et al., “A Dynamic Grid Services Deployment Mechanism for On-Demand Resource Provisioning”, IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid:863-870, 2005.
Chipara et al, “Realtime Power-Aware Routing in Sensor Network”, IEEE, 2006, 10 pages.
Clark, C., “Live Migration of Virtual Machines,” May 2005, NSDI '05: 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, MA, May 2-4, 2005, retrieved from http://www.usenix.org/events/nsdi05/tech/full—papers/clark/clark.pdf, 14 pages.
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Apr. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 2, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/Ixf/38/iptables.pdf, 4 pages.
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Mar. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 1, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/Ixf/39/iptables.pdf, 4 pages.
Deleuze, C., et al., A DNS Based Mapping Peering System for Peering CDNs, draft-deleuze-cdnp-dnsmap-peer-00.txt, Nov. 20, 2000, 20 pages.
Demers, A., “Epidemic Algorithms for Replicated Database Maintenance,” 1987, Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Aug. 10-12, 1987, 12 pages.
Gruener, J., “A Vision of Togetherness,” May 24, 2004, NetworkWorld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from, http://www.networkworld.com/supp/2004/ndc3/0524virt.html, 9 pages.
Gunther et al, “Measuring Round Trip Times to determine the Distance between WLAN Nodes”, Dec. 18, 2004, Technical University Berlin, all pages.
loannidis, S., et al., “Implementing a Distributed Firewall,” Nov. 2000, (ACM) Proceedings of the ACM Computer and Communications Security (CCS) 2000, Athens, Greece, pp. 190-199, retrieved from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dls/STRONGMAN/Papers/df.pdf, 10 pages.
Joseph, Joshy, et al., “Introduction to Grid Computing,” Apr. 16, 2004, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.informit.com/articles/printerfriendly.aspx?p=169508, 19 pages.
Kenshi, P., “Help File Library: Iptables Basics,” Justlinux, retrieved Dec. 1, 2005, from http://www.justlinux.com/nhf/Security/Iptables—Basics.html, 4 pages.
Liu et al., “Combined mining of Web server logs and web contents for classifying user navigation patterns and predicting users' future requests,” Data & Knowledge Engineering 61 (2007) pp. 304-330.
Maesono, et al., “A Local Scheduling Method considering Data Transfer in Data Grid,” Technical Report of IEICE, vol. 104, No. 692, pp. 435-440, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Japan, Feb., 2005.
Shankland, S., “Sun to buy start-up to bolster N1 ,” Jul. 30, 2003, CNet News.com, retrieved May 3, 2006, http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513—22-5057752.html, 8 pages.
Strand, L., “Adaptive distributed firewall using intrusion detection,” Nov. 1, 2004, University of Oslo Department of Informatics, retrieved Mar. 8, 2006, from http://gnist.org/˜lars/studies/master/StrandLars-master.pdf, 158 pages.
Takizawa, et al., “Scalable MultiReplication Framework on The Grid,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2004, No. 81, pp. 247-252, Japan, Aug. 1, 2004.
Tan et al., “Classification: Basic Concepts, Decision Tree, and Model Evaluation”, Introduction in Data Mining; http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/˜kumar/dmbook/ch4.pdf, 2005, pp. 245-205.
Van Renesse, R., “Astrolabe: A Robust and Scalable Technology for Distributed System Monitoring, Management, and Data Mining,” May 2003, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 21 (2): 164-206, 43 pages.
Vijayan, J., “Terraspring Gives Sun's N1 a Boost,” Nov. 25, 2002, Computerworld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2002/0,4814, 76159,00.html, 3 pages.
Virtual Iron Software Home, Virtual Iron, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.virtualiron.com/, 1 page.
Waldspurger, CA., “Spawn: A Distributed Computational Economy,” Feb. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(2): 103-117,15 pages.
Watanabe, et al., “Remote Program Shipping System for GridRPC Systems,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2003, No. 102, pp. 73-78, Japan, Oct. 16, 2003.
Xu et al', “Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data”, Remote Sensing of Environment 97 (2005) pp. 322-336.
Yamagata, et al., “A virtual-machine based fast deployment tool for Grid execution environment, ” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2006, No. 20, pp. 127-132, Japan, Feb. 28, 2006.
Zhu, Xiaoyun, et al., “Utility-Driven Workload Management Using Nested Control Design,” Mar. 29, 2006, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, HPL-2005-193(R.1), retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2005/HPL-2005-193R1.pdf, 9 pages.
First Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Oct. 12, 2011 (SEAZN.194VSG) in 12 pages.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Apr. 30, 2012 (SEAZN.194VSG) in 10 pages.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111422.3 dated Apr. 13, 2012 (SEAZN.194VCN).
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502138 dated Feb. 1, 2013 (SEAZN.194VJP).
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006837-7, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 (SEAZN.197VSG) in 11 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09727694.3 mailed Jan. 30, 2012 (SEAZN.197VEP) in 6 pages.
Singapore Examination Report in Application No. 201006837-7 mailed Mar. 16, 2012 (SEAZN.197VSG).
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Feb. 16, 2013 (SEAZN.197VCN).
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Dec. 25, 2013 (SEAZN.197VCN).
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Jul. 7, 2014 (SEAZN.197VCN).
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502139 dated Nov. 5, 2013 (SEAZN.197VJP).
Decision of Rejection in Application No. 2011-502139 dated Jun. 30, 2014 (SEAZN.197VJP).
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006874-0, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 (SEAZN.207VSG) in 10 pages.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502140 mailed Dec. 7, 2012 (SEAZN.207VJP).
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Jul. 6, 2012 (SEAZN.207VCN).
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Apr. 15, 2013 (SEAZN.207VCN).
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201006874-0 dated May 16, 2012 (SEAZN.207VSG).
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09728756.9 mailed Jan. 8, 2013 (SEAZN.209VEP).
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Jul. 4, 2012 (SEAZN.209VCN).
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Mar. 12, 2013 (SEAZN.209VCN).
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Oct. 21, 2013.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-503091 dated Nov. 18, 2013.
Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Singapore Application No. 201006873-2 mailed on Oct. 12, 2011.
First Office Action is Chinese Application No. 200980125551.8 mailed Jul. 4, 2012.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Mar. 6, 2013.
Second Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Mar. 17, 2014.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2726915 dated May 13, 2013.
First Office Action in Korean Application No. Oct. 2011-7002461 mailed May 29, 2013.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980145872.4 dated Nov. 29, 2012.
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201310717573.1 dated Feb. 25, 2014. English Translation Not Yet Received.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Feb. 25, 2013.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Oct. 21, 2013.
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 mailed Nov. 19, 2012.
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 dated Aug. 13, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Nov. 28, 2011 in 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Apr. 2, 2013.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 mailed Feb. 3, 2014 in 6 pages.
First Office Action issued in Australian Application No. 2011307319 mailed Mar. 6, 2014 in 5 pages.
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 mailed Jul. 1, 2014.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 mailed Nov. 3, 2014.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed May 22, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed Mar. 30, 2012 in 11 pages.
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 28, 2013. English Translation Not Yet Received.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-540982 dated Jun. 2, 2014 English Translation Not Yet Received.
Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201303521-7 dated May 20, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US07/07601 mailed Jul. 18, 2008 in 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2007/007601 mailed Sep. 30, 2008 in 8 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 07754164.7 mailed Dec. 20, 2010 in 7 pages.
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200780020255.2 dated Mar. 4, 2013.
Office Action in Indian Application No. 3742/Kolnp/2008 dated Nov. 22, 2013.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2012-052264 mailed Dec. 11, 2012 in 26 pages.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 mailed Apr. 15, 2014 in 3 pages.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61613921 Mar 2012 US