This application is based upon provisional application Ser. No. 61/104,133, filed Jan. 16, 2015, all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
For many years a variety of manual (non-electric) sharpeners have been developed and sold using interdigitating, comb-like abrasive structures as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,390,431 and 5,582,535.
Although this technology has been effective and broadly accepted by consumers, it had a number of limitations. First, the motion of the blade against the abrasive surfaces created a pattern of grooves along the edge facet that were parallel to the apex of the edge. These grooves tend to undercut and weaken the metal supporting the edge. Since the predominant mechanism of edge failure is the edge curling and folding over on itself, these grooves tend to reduce the durability of the edge.
Secondly, the finishing stage of these type of sharpeners, when using very fine grits of abrasives, develop an edge apex that is uninterrupted and perfectly linear. Although this type of edge is effective for many cutting functions, it was discovered that edges with micro serration are more effective for many household and outdoors applications. However, achieving a microserrated edge with interdigitating comb-like structures would be very difficult and costly.
An object of this invention is to provide an improved method and apparatus for sharpening of knives and other blades.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved combination of sharpening technologies that cooperate with each other to provide a more effective and more durable edge.
It is a further object of this invention to provide unique multi-stage sharpeners, incorporating these improvements, that are able to sharpen blades of a variety of factory set edge angles.
In accordance with this invention the sharpener includes at least one pre-sharpening stage and a finishing stage. The abrasive sharpening structure in the pre-sharpening stage preferably is in the form of interdigitating comb-like abrasive structure. The abrasive structure in the finishing stage is a pair of abrasive surfaced truncated conical disks having their small ends disposed toward each other.
One embodiment of this invention is illustrated by
The first stages use interdigitating comb-like structures with coarse abrasives to quickly remove the necessary amount of metal from the dull and damaged edge, and form the first two facets of the edge. This is based on the technology of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,390,431 and 5,582,535, all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
The second stage (finishing stage 2) is designed using the technology described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,043,143 and 9,168,627, all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto. This technology comprises a pair of diamond coated disks mounted on a rotatable shaft supported by molded-in bearings that are part of the molded sharpener structure. The sharpening disks are faced with an abrasive coated member that has the surface contour of a truncated cone. The disks are press fitted onto the rotatable shaft with the small ends of the truncated cones pressed into contact with each other on the shaft. Other variations using this principle will be obvious to those skilled in this art.
As shown in
As shown in
Although the interdigitating comb-like abrasive structure has some limitations, it provides some significant advantages. First, by using coarser abrasives, they can remove metal quickly and efficiently. Second, unlike rotating disk pair structures, their geometry allows the edge to be sharpened within 1/16″ to 3/32″ of the knife bolster or handle. Third, their geometry allows the two comb-like structures to be set at a broad range of total included angles to accommodate virtually any size edge angle in the range of 15°-90°, a versatility that a sharpening system totally based on paired rotating disk technology lacks. And, finally, they are very economical to produce since they can be manufactured in large planar matrixes to be separated into individual abrasive members prior to assembly into a sharpener.
Thus as described above and shown in
By designing the second stage with the paired disk technology, the blade sharpener can utilize the above advantages of interdigitating pad technology but overcome their limitations.
First, by setting the finishing angle in these disks at a slightly larger angle than in the first stage, and using finer abrasives, the pattern of parallel grooves to the edge, which tend to undercut the edge and reduce the edge durability are removed and replaced by a new pattern of crossing grooves that are more perpendicular to the edge, creating a second facet at a larger angle and improving the durability of the edge.
Furthermore, this pair of second facets converge at the apex of the edge to form an edge with micro serrations that is more effective by providing more “bite.”
Because of the versatility provided by the sharpening stages using abrasive coated interdigitating comb-like structures in sharpening a wide variety of edge angles, this design concept can be easily expanded to sharpening a wide variety of knives and other blades. For example, the inventors can envision a three stage sharpener, with the sharpening elements of the initial two sharpening stages 1A and 1B formed to sharpen 15° and 20° factory edges respectively, and the finishing stage 2, utilizing the rotating disk technology and where the sharpening elements are set at a slightly larger angle than 20°, providing the finishing stage for either type of edge. Thus, sharpener 10 could be used where pre-sharpening stage 1A is used for Asian style knives which have an angle, for example, between 12-18° while pre-sharpening stage 1B could be used for Western style or Euro/American style knives typically having an angle between 17 and 23°. Stage 2 could have an angle of 19-25° and should be greater than the angles of the pre-sharpening stages.
Although the preferred practice of this invention uses interdigitating, comb-like abrasive structures for the pre-sharpening stage, other pre-sharpening techniques could be used in combination with the finishing stage. Such pre-sharpening techniques could also have advantages, such as speed and/or economy, and would differ from the truncated conical disks of the finishing stage which have their small ends disposed toward and preferably in contact with each other. Alternate pre-sharpening elements include crossed diamond covered (or covered with other abrasives such as silicon carbide) rods, crossed tungsten carbide rods or plates with sharp edges, crossed ceramic or stone rods, and crossed rods made of hardened steels that have sharp edges. Similarly, these pre-sharpening elements can also take the shape of partially overlapping disks that provide a slot through which the knife edge can be drawn. Where there are two pre-sharpening stages, the sharpening structure in the two stages may differ from each other.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1570083 | Runzi | Jan 1926 | A |
2137201 | Boyer | Nov 1938 | A |
2709379 | Murchison | May 1955 | A |
2749678 | Jahn | Jun 1956 | A |
2841926 | Lebus | Jul 1958 | A |
2860452 | Lebus | Nov 1958 | A |
D284736 | Kawai et al. | Jul 1986 | S |
4627194 | Friel | Dec 1986 | A |
4716689 | Friel | Jan 1988 | A |
4807399 | Friel | Feb 1989 | A |
D303209 | Friel | Sep 1989 | S |
D310620 | Friel | Sep 1990 | S |
5005319 | Friel | Apr 1991 | A |
D328410 | Friel | Aug 1992 | S |
5148634 | Bigliano | Sep 1992 | A |
5245791 | Bigliano | Sep 1993 | A |
5390431 | Friel | Feb 1995 | A |
5582535 | Friel | Dec 1996 | A |
5611726 | Friel | Mar 1997 | A |
D409891 | Friel | May 1999 | S |
6012971 | Friel | Jan 2000 | A |
6071181 | Wightman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6113476 | Friel | Sep 2000 | A |
6267652 | Friel | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D491783 | Ikegaki et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6752702 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6802763 | Leung | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6863600 | Friel | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875093 | Friel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6876093 | Goto et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881137 | Friel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6932683 | Li | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6997795 | Friel | Feb 2006 | B2 |
D542616 | Elek | May 2007 | S |
D543430 | Barr | May 2007 | S |
7235004 | Friel, Sr. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7287445 | Friel | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D567611 | Elek | Apr 2008 | S |
D575124 | Smith | Aug 2008 | S |
7452262 | Friel | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7488241 | Elek | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494403 | Friel | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517275 | Friel | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D605918 | Deglon | Dec 2009 | S |
7686676 | Friel | Mar 2010 | B2 |
D614009 | Deglon | Apr 2010 | S |
D620332 | Elek | Jul 2010 | S |
D632153 | Walker et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
8043143 | Elek | Oct 2011 | B2 |
D651887 | Elek | Jan 2012 | S |
D652284 | Elek | Jan 2012 | S |
D665647 | Friel | Aug 2012 | S |
8267750 | Friel | Sep 2012 | B2 |
D680399 | Elek et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
D688545 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2013 | S |
8585462 | Jensen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
D699534 | Elek et al. | Feb 2014 | S |
8678882 | Huber et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
D705625 | Huber et al. | May 2014 | S |
8864554 | Masalin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8944894 | Smith | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9168627 | Elek et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9242331 | Elek et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20030077990 | Li | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030236061 | Li | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040077296 | Friel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040198198 | Friel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070077872 | Elek et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080261494 | Friel et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090209177 | Walker | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090233530 | Friel | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090298401 | Smith et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110034111 | Elek | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130165021 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140198198 | Geissbuehler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/013370 mailed on Mar. 18, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160207171 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62104133 | Jan 2015 | US |