The present invention relates generally to primary packaging and more particularly, to manually openable packages for containing a product. Specifically, the present invention refers to manually openable packages formed from recyclable materials.
Discarded packaging materials often wind up in a landfill. In some countries, particularly the U.S., there is a significant decrease in the availability of landfill space when approximately 90% of the municipal solid waste is disposed of by landfilling. Recyclable packaging materials can dramatically reduce landfill waste. Today, there are a number of plastics considered recyclable which may enter established recycling streams. These materials include low density and linear low density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene and a few others. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles and jars are generally considered recyclable. The PET can be recovered and recycled again and again thorough washing and re-melting for use in new bottles or jars, or by chemically breaking down the PET into its constituent raw materials, which are then purified and converted into new PET resins. In the last few years there has been a significant increase in the use of PET trays by the packaging industry. Unfortunately, most of these trays and other PET containing packaging cannot be easily recycled because they are made up of a plurality of layers of a variety of plastic materials. Recycling of such packages can involve costly cleaning and sorting operations to separate the recyclable plastics from any non-recyclable materials. The fewer the non-recyclable materials there are and the more chemically similar the recyclable plastics present in a package, the less expensive and more efficient the recycling operations become.
An important object of the present invention is that the thermoplastic package includes a tray and a lidding film both of which are suitable for recycling into a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling stream. Towards this end, packages according to the present invention comprise predominantly amorphous polyethylene terephthalate (APET) relative to the total weight of the package. In one preferred embodiment, the package of the present invention advantageously comprises at least 97% by weight of recyclable polyethylene terephthalate relative to the total weight of the package.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a package especially for retail display for containing a food such as fresh produce, cheeses and meats, and/or non-food product. In one preferred embodiment, the package of the present invention is advantageously well-suited for packaging of respiring foodstuffs, particularly carbon dioxide respiring foodstuffs, especially cheese such as for example emmental, gouda and edam. Towards this specific end, the packages of the present invention have an average oxygen transmission rate of 12 cm3/m2 for 24 hours at 23° and 50% relative humidity and an average carbon dioxide transmission rate of 54 cm3/m2 for 24 hours at 23° and 50% relative humidity.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a manually openable package which includes a tray peelable heat sealed to a lidding film laminate. A manually openable package is one in which the peel strength of the lidding film laminate to the tray can be controlled over a wide temperature range. It is important that the seal between the tray and lidding film have sufficient seal strength to remain secure and unbroken during package fabrication, distribution and storage. In one preferred embodiment, the heat seal between the tray and lidding film is hermetic and can readily peel apart by hand without uncontrolled or random tearing or rupturing of the tray and/or lidding film. A manually peelable heat seal is one having a peel strength of between 1 N/15 and 6 N/15 mm at 23° C.
The basic embodiment of the present invention is a package for containing a product having a thermoplastic tray with a product receiving area and a sealing flange. The tray is formed from an amorphous polyethylene terephthalate. The invention includes a multilayer thermoplastic lidding film laminate having seal area which is peelable sealed to the tray. The laminate includes a first outer layer comprising a polyester copolymer heat sealing lacquer positioned within the seal area, a second outer layer comprising an amorphous polyethylene terephthalate, and a third layer positioned between the first and second outer layers which comprises an oriented polyethylene terephthalate. The present invention further includes a hermetic seal having a perimeter heat seal circumventing the product receiving area formed by heat sealing a portion of the seal area of the laminate to the sealing flange of the tray.
An advantageous optional feature of the present invention is that it may include an integrally formed tamper-evident feature. In one preferred embodiment, the tamper-evident feature comprises visible whitened area of the sealing flange of the tray produced when the hermetic seal has been breached which occurs when the lidding film is peeled from the tray,
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
A preferred embodiment of the package 10 of the present invention includes a thermoplastic tray 11 and a multilayer thermoplastic lidding film laminate 12 as depicted in
As depicted in
In its final form, package 10 further includes a hermetic seal 13 comprising a perimeter heat seal 14 circumventing the product receiving area 11a formed by heat sealing a portion of the seal area 12a of the laminate 12 to the sealing flange 11b of the tray. Package 10 may optionally include an integrally formed tamper-evident feature 15. In one preferred embodiment, the tamper-evident feature 15 is visible whitened area of the sealing flange 11b of the tray which is produced when the hermetic seal 13 has been breached and occurs when the lidding film laminate 12 is peeled from the tray 11, as depicted in
The construction of the lidding film laminate 12 is an important aspect of the present invention and includes a plurality of recyclable layers. In one preferred embodiment as depicted in
Layer 102 is a second outer layer positioned opposite first outer layer 101. In one preferred embodiment, second outer layer 102 is a free-standing film comprising amorphous polyethylene terephthalate. As a free-standing film, second outer layer 102 has a thickness which may vary between 50 μm and 500 μm, or between 80 μm and 350 μm, or between 150 μm and 250 μm.
Third layer 103 is positioned between first and second outer layers 101 and 102 and comprises oriented polyethylene terephthalate. This layer functions not only as a substrate for application of first layer 101, but also as a barrier to any residual solvent that may be present after application and drying of first layer 101. Because there may be residual solvent still present after the drying operation, a barrier is need to prevent migration of minutiae amounts of solvent which might cause off-flavors in food products packaged within the present invention. Towards this end, third layer 103 may have a thickness appreciably less than second out layer 102. Accordingly, third layer 103 has a thickness of between 5 μm and 200 μm, or between 5 μm and 150 μm, or between 10 μm and 100 μm. Examples of such commercially available oriented polyethylene terephthalate are those sold under the trademark family SKYROL® by SKC, Incorporated, Covington, Ga., USA.
Optionally, as depicted in
Optionally, as depicted in
Optionally, as depicted in
In the production of Example 1 as illustrated in
Example 1 is one embodiment of lidding film laminate 100d of the present invention having a structure and layer compositions as described below and as illustrated in
The peel strength of an hermetic seal of Example 1 was measured by heat sealing the sealant layer of the inventive laminate 100d to an amorphous polyethylene terephthalate (APET) substrate at different temperatures under 530 N and a dwell time of 2 seconds. Specimens for testing after heat sealing were prepared by die cutting samples to a length of 100 mm and a width of 15 mm. The peel strength test was performed using a tensile testing apparatus with an un-sealed section of laminate 100d mounted in an upper jig and an un-sealed section of the APET substrate was folded back 180° and mounted in a lower jig. The test was implemented at a loading speed of 200 mm/min. The peel force values to delaminate the laminate 100d from the APET substrate were measured by moving the bottom jig vertically away from the top jig for a pre-determined distance. These force values were then averaged. This average value was taken as the average peel force. The average peel force (N, newton) per 15 mm and its standard deviation at different sealing temperatures were tabulated and are shown in TABLE 1 below.
The above description and examples illustrate certain embodiments of the present invention and are not to be interpreted as limiting. Selection of particular embodiments, combinations thereof, modifications, and adaptations of the various embodiments, conditions and parameters normally encountered in the art will be apparent to those skilled in the art and a deemed to be within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/019355 | 3/9/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/144308 | 9/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3686069 | Winkler et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
4375494 | Stokes | Mar 1983 | A |
4765999 | Winter | Aug 1988 | A |
4980210 | Heyes | Dec 1990 | A |
5039001 | Kinigakis et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5079052 | Heyes | Jan 1992 | A |
5358184 | Skudrzyk | Oct 1994 | A |
5508075 | Roulin | Apr 1996 | A |
5882789 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6066594 | Gunn | May 2000 | A |
6610378 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7186452 | Felffer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205040 | Feiffer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7569276 | Kendig et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
8133592 | Takada et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20040023045 | Andersson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040132600 | Magnusson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20090130276 | Voisin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20130224946 | Fayne et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150101741 | Glaser | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150284162 | Bellamah | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2878440 | Jun 2015 | EP |
9958328 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of EP2878440, Wink et al., Jun. 3, 2015, Fig. 3 (Year: 2015). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180037388 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |