This application claims priority to German Application No. 10 2010 006 152.2-14 filed on Jan. 29, 2010.
The present invention relates to a manually operated hammer drill.
A manually operated hammer drill usually includes a spindle which drives a chuck about an axis of rotation during drilling operations. The spindle itself is usually driven by an electric motor. Typically, such a hammer drill also includes a pneumatic hammer mechanism, which exerts a hammering action on the tool inserted in the chuck during hammer drilling operations. A hammer mechanism of such kind typically includes a piston, which in hammer mode moves back and forth parallel to the axis of rotation inside a cylinder formed in the spindle. The reciprocating movements of the piston are intended to create pulses of pressure inside the cylinder that cause an actuation piston to move back and forth as well, so that it strikes a percussion piston which in turn transfers these impacts to the respective tool. In order to be able to create these pressure pulses as effectively as possible, it is expedient to seal the piston off from the cylinder. For this purpose, the piston may be equipped with at least one radial groove in which an annular seal is disposed. This annular seal is prone to very rapid wear because of the reciprocating motion of the piston.
Modern hammer drills may also be equipped with a hammer action deactivation switch, which enables drilling to be performed without percussive action. To do this, for example, a powertrain between the spindle and the driving electric motor is interrupted, for example by means of a coupling or similar. When hammer mode is switched off, the piston does not execute any reciprocating movements in the cylinder. In drilling mode, the spindle rotates about the axis of rotation and thus also about the piston. When hammer mode is deactivated, this subjects the annular seal to particularly high stress. As a result, it may overheat and be damaged. A damaged annular seal reduces the sealing effect between the piston and the cylinder which in turn impairs the effectiveness of the pressure pulses in hammer mode and thus also the performance of the hammer drill.
This disclosure relates to an improved design for a hammer drills that provides reduced wear.
The disclosed hammer drill provides for synchronising the radial groove and the annular seal in such manner that the annular seal is able to move parallel to the axis of rotation inside the radial groove, and the radial groove has a variable groove depth parallel to the axis of rotation. The sealing effect between the piston and the cylinder depends on the contact pressure exerted on the cylinder by the annular seal. The greater this radial pressing force, the greater the effective frictional forces as well. Because of the varying groove depth of the radial seal and the movability of the annular seal in the radial groove, the annular seal is able to assume a position where the groove is less deep when the piston is moving, so that the sealing effect is increased. As soon as the piston stops moving, for example when it travels through a dead point in the oscillating reciprocating movement, the annular seal is able to take up a position in which the groove depth is greater, so that friction may be reduced significantly. Consequently, wear on the annular seal in hammer mode may be reduced. The effect of this reduction in wear is particularly evident if the hammer action is deactivated, for example by switching hammer mode off, and the piston does not move for a sustained period.
A groove base is at the greatest distance from the cylinder in an area axial relative to the axis of rotation of a cross sectional profile of the radial groove where the groove is deepest. Smaller distances then exist axially adjacent thereto
If the annular seal is located in the area where the distance from the cylinder is greatest, the force pressing it against the cylinder is smaller, so that the friction between the radial groove the cylinder is reduced for drilling action without hammer mode. On the other hand, if the annular seal is located in an axial area of the cross sectional profile that is less distant from the cylinder, the pressure forcing the annular seal against the cylinder increases, which increases the insulating effectiveness of the seal and is consequently associated with improved performance of the hammer drill in hammer mode.
It is particularly advantageous to provide the cross sectional profile of the radial groove parallel to the axis of rotation with an area at a smaller distance from the cylinder on either side of the area at the greatest distance from the cylinder. The advantage of this construction is that the annular seal is widened outside the middle area at the greatest distance, and consequently it is biased radially inwards, so that the annular seal tends to move towards the middle area at the greatest distance automatically. This may occur especially when hammer mode is switched off and when the spindle is stationary. When the piston is not moving but the spindle is rotating, the movement of the annular seal towards the middle area at the greatest distance is further encouraged, with the result that the annular seal automatically migrates to the area at the greatest distance, where the least friction arises between the annular seal and the cylinder, when the piston is stationary. On the other hand, if hammer mode is activated the reciprocating movements of the piston cause the annular seal to move out of the middle area and into one of the other areas at a smaller distance depending on the direction of the stroke. This relative movement between the annular seal and the radial groove may be supported by inertial forces on the one hand and favoured on the other by the friction that is generated between the annular seal and the cylinder. In other words, when the piston is moving, that is to say when hammer action is activated, the annular seal automatically assumes the positions within the radial groove that are less distance from the cylinder, which increases its sealing effect and thus also the effectiveness of the hammer mechanism.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the cross sectional profile of the radial groove may be created symmetrically about a plane of symmetry extending perpendicularly to the axis of rotation. The area at the greatest distance is then located in the middle of the cross sectional profile of the radial groove, and the two adjacent end areas are of equal size. This results in essentially the same effects for the annular seal for both stroke directions of the piston.
According to another advantageous embodiment, the maximum distance may be of equal or greater size than a maximum diameter of the annular seal's cross section measured between the groove base and the cylinder, to the extent possible in consideration of production tolerances. In other words, the maximum distance is adjusted to the annular seal in such manner that the annual seal is in force-free contact with the cylinder, or does not contact it at all when it is located in the axial area of maximum distance. Friction is thus minimised.
Further important features and advantages of the inventions are explained in the subordinate claims, the drawing, and the associated description of the figures with reference to the drawing.
Of course, the features described in the preceding and those that will be explained in the remainder of this document may be implemented not only in the combination cited in each case, but also in other combinations or alone without exceeding the scope of the present invention.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the figures and will be explained in greater detail in the following description, in which the same reference numbers are used to refer to identical, or similar, or functionally equivalent components.
In the drawing, all figures of which are schematic in nature
According to
In hammer mode, hammer mechanism 4 serves to hammer against a tool, not shown here, which is inserted in chuck 5 for this purpose. Hammer drill 1 may be equipped preferably with a hammer action deactivation switch 8 for activating and deactivating hammer mechanism 4. This switch may comprise for example a manually operable switching element 9 with hammer mode may be switched on and off. To do this, for example, hammer action deactivation switch 8 appropriately interrupts a drive path between electric motor 7 and hammer mechanism 4, for example via a coupling.
As shown in
To provide oscillating drive of piston 10, hammer mechanism 4 may include a crank drive 16, which couples piston 10 with a drive wheel 18 via a connecting rod 17, and when hammer mode is activated the drive wheel rotates about an axis of rotation 19 perpendicular to axis of rotation 6 and entrains a driving pin 20 arranged eccentrically with respect to axis of rotation 19 to drive connecting rod 17. Connecting rod 17 is coupled in non-rotating manner with piston 10. When hammer mode is deactivated, piston 10 does not perform a reciprocating motion, and remains stationary relative to axis of rotation 6. The rotary lock between connecting rod 17 and piston 10 is assured for example by means of a bolt 23, with which connecting rod 17 is connected to piston 10. In the cutaway views of
As shown in
As shown in the detail view of
In an axial direction 49 extending parallel to axis of rotation 6, indicated in
Groove base 26 of the cross-sectional profile 24 of radial groove 21 has an axial area 31 in which the groove base 26 is at a maximum distance 32 from cylinder 11. Groove base 26 also has at least one further axial area 33, 34 in which groove base 26 has at least one smaller distance 35 from cylinder 11, that is to say at least one distance 35 that is smaller than maximum distance 32.
In the preferred example shown in
The preferred configuration of radial groove 21 and the cross-sectional profile 24 thereof is the symmetrical configuration shown in
On the other hand, end areas 33, 34 are preferably shaped such that at least the essential sections thereof are straight. These straight sections are designated in
In the example, cross-sectional profile 24 of radial groove 21 is at least 20% larger in the axial direction 49, that is to say parallel to axis of rotation 6, than cross-sectional profile 27 of annular seal 22 in the same direction, that is to say parallel to axis of rotation 6. It is helpful if the cross-sectional profile 24 of radial groove 21 parallel to axis t of rotation 6 is 50% larger than the cross-sectional profile 27 of annular seal 22.
In the embodiment shown in
In order to supply electrical power to electric motor 7, hammer drill 1 may be connected to a mains power supply via a cable not shown here. It is also possible to equip hammer drill 1 with a rechargeable battery which allows hammer drill 1 to be operated independently of a mains power supply. Such a rechargeable battery is not shown in
With reference to
On the other hand,
The larger diameters 46, 48 that the annular seal assumes automatically in hammer mode increase the force with which annular seal 22 is pressed against cylinder 11, thereby improving the sealing effect and thus also the performance capability of hammer mechanism 4 and accordingly hammer drill 1.
The foregoing description is only exemplary of the principles of the invention. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than using the example embodiments which have been specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 006 152 | Jan 2010 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2420104 | Smith | May 1947 | A |
3067584 | Atkinson | Dec 1962 | A |
3353454 | Donovan | Nov 1967 | A |
3895815 | Panigati | Jul 1975 | A |
4192391 | Kastreuz et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4418924 | Mack | Dec 1983 | A |
4428276 | Loveless | Jan 1984 | A |
4577870 | Scott et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
5071318 | Bice et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5617879 | Kubala | Apr 1997 | A |
5941537 | Wallace et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6237699 | Plietsch et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
7331408 | Arich et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7815195 | Meller et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2405176 | Aug 1974 | DE |
2729596 | Jan 1979 | DE |
10311155 | Sep 2004 | DE |
60036244 | Jun 2008 | DE |
102008061173 | Jun 2010 | DE |
0152373 | Jan 1985 | EP |
1027963 | Aug 2000 | EP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated May 13, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110186317 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |