Manufacture and use of agricultural spray adjuvants for hard water conditions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11395484
  • Patent Number
    11,395,484
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 7, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 26, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • AgQuam R&D, LLC (Spokane, WA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Arnold; Ernst V
    Agents
    • Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.
Abstract
The invention pertains to a method for manufacture and use of pesticides or agricultural spray adjuvants that counteracts the effects of hard water cat ions on anionic pesticides when applied in water spray solutions. The disclosed agricultural spray adjuvants include glyphosate compositions comprising a strong mineral acid, such as sulfuric acid, and a polyamine surfactant, such as tallow amine or coco amine.
Description
BACKGROUND

It is known that the addition of fertilizer blends in the application of many pesticides will improve the performance of the active ingredient. The current market standard is ammonium sulfate (AMS). It is speculated that one of the reasons for this is that the anion portion of the fertilizer blend, sulfate, will associate with the hard water cation. Therefore the anion or acidic pesticide will not associate with the hard water cation and be more available for uptake into the target species. “Data suggest hard-water cations, such as Ca+2 and Mg+2 present in the spray solution can greatly reduce the efficacy of glyphosate. These cations potentially compete with the isopropylamine in the formulation for association with the glyphosate anion.”1 Hard water with cations present in a concentration range higher than 100 ppm-150 ppm have been shown to cause a decrease in effectiveness of many pesticides.2 It is thought by some authors that the reason for the reduced activity with glyphosate is that the glyphosate anion will form insoluble salts with many hard water cations. This would be true for many anions pesticides including glyphosate, 2,4-D and glufosinate. This would also be true for acidic herbicides that could become anionic depending upon pH an example of this would be sethoxydim.3,4


This information has lead to the common practice of glyphosate and other anionic pesticides being applied in the presence of ammonium sulfate (AMS) in the spray mixture. However, in other industries a common practice to remove hard water cations such as Ca+2, Fe+2, Mg+2 and Zn+2 is with acidic reaction with mineral acids such as nitric and sulfuric acid.5 This technology has been adapted to cation management in both soil and irrigation water and is based on the “Langelier index”.6 Cation management with phosphoric acid as a spray mixture has been tried with limited success as compared to spray mixtures containing AMS. It is speculated that the reason that phosphoric acid products do not work as well as AMS is that phosphoric acid does not completely dissociate when added to water at normal spray mixture pH ranges.8 It is therefore less reactive to the hard water cations than originally thought by the creators of these products. Other mineral acids were considered to be impractical in pesticide applications because small mistakes or misuse with these powerful acids will drop the pH of a spray solution in the spray tank below the pKa of many anionic pesticides, including glyphosate. If this occurs the pesticide will precipitate and will no longer be sprayable.


An idea was formed that mineral acid management of hard water cations would be much more efficient than AMS management of hard water cations if a mineral acid that completely dissociates in water could be used and a reliable delivery system could be devised or discovered for these types of acids. The three driving factors for this idea are: 1) Much less acid is needed to tie up the hard water cations than AMS. The amount of AMS recommended is 17.5 lb per 100 gallons of waters with 150-250 ppm hard water cations.4 Whereas only 1.3 oz of sulfuric acid per 100 gallons is needed to neutralize the 150-250 ppm hard water cations.7 2) Sulfuric acid and nitric acid will form semi and insoluble salts with the hard water cations. Whereas AMS has only been shown to associate with these cations. It is unlikely that they form salts.3 3) AMS as a salt is hard to dissolve into the spray solutions which makes it difficult to work with. Whereas, acids are completely miscible in water.

  • 1. The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Thelen, K. D. Weed Science v. 43 (4) 1995 pp. 541-548.
  • 2. Weed Science Principles and Application. Anderson, W P third edition, West Publishing Co. Minneapolis Minn.
  • 3. Nalewaja, J. D. and R. Matysiak. 1993. Pesticide Sci. 38:77-84.
  • 4. Role of AMS with glyphosate products. Hartzler, R. Extension Bulletin, Iowa State University.
  • 5. David Wm. Reed. 1996. Water, media and nutrition for greenhouse crops. Ball Publishing, Batavia, Ill., ISBN: 1-883052-12-2.
  • 6. Bohn H. L., McNeal, B. L., O'Connor, G. A., Soil Chemistry, A Wiley-Interscience Pub. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
  • 7. Greenhouse Product News February '99.
  • 8. Morrison R. T. and Boyd N. B. Organic Chemistry, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A mixture of strong mineral acids which would completely dissociate in water, including but not limited to; nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, perchloric acid, and a polymer, preferred would be cationic, that is formulated as an agricultural spray adjuvant. The polymer in the formulation acts as a slow release mechanism for the acid. Polymeric forces on the mineral acid give the grower a practical mechanism for using mineral acid to counteract hard water cations. The adjuvant when mixed in a agricultural spray solution would act to tie up the hard water cations thus protecting any anionic pesticides, defoliants or plant growth regulators from reacting with the hard water cations such as Ca++, Mg++, Fe++ and becoming less effective as an agricultural chemicals. Thus the spray adjuvant would act to increase the apparent efficacy of the active ingredient being applied.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. Formula 21-1 as compared to AMS for the reduction of hard water tie up of glyphosate salt. As measured by percent control of annual bluegrass. Zinc acetate added as the complexing Anion. V/v=volume to volume.



FIG. 2. The effect of Formula 21-1 on restoring the activity of glyphosate as demonstrated by percent control of annual bluegrass as compared to ammonium sulfate (AMS). Magnesium Sulfant (MgSu) was added to the mixture to simulate hard water cations.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Strong mineral acids were added to polymers in an attempt to deliver a controlled amount of acid into a spray solution. The acid would act as a “hard water cation scavenger”. The mixture would be an agronomic spray “hard water scavenger system”. In the preferred example sulfuric acid was added to tallow amine. Heat was given off indicating some reaction. However, pH measurements of spray mixtures taken before and after the addition of the “hard water scavenger system” shows that free acid still existed.


Knowing that any potential spray solution which could be contemplated would have to stay above a pH of which is higher than the pKa of most anionic pesticides. Differing mixtures of several examples where made up. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3. It was thought that this would be a more efficient method to condition the spray waters than current practice of using Ammonium Sulfate (AMS). However, the mixture would have to remain stable, not drop the pH below the pKa of anionic pesticides and work as well as or better than AMS. The efficiency would be gained by replacing large bags of dry AMS (17.5 lbs/100 gallons spray solution) or large volumes (5 gallon/100 gallons spray solution) of liquid AMS with 1 quart to 1 gallon per 100 gallons of spray solution with this kind of product. Also this liquid product would go into solution much faster than the current AMS goes into solution adding even more efficiency.


It was discovered that cationic macro molecules would make a stable mix with sulfuric acid. Also, cationic surfactant would act as a system that would deliver enough free acid to tie up hard water cations. While at the same time maintain the pH of the spray water above the pKa of the active ingredient being sprayed thus increasing the efficacy of the pesticide.


It was surprising to discover that these mixtures increased or maintained the efficacy of anionic pesticides under hard water conditions much better than the current practice of adding Ammonium Sulfate (FIG. 1 and FIG. 2).









TABLE 1





Example 1


Formula 21-1


















Water
65.9%/wt



Tallow Am 3780
30.0 



SAG 10
0.1



93% Sulfuric
4.0

















TABLE 2





Example 2


Formula 21-2


















Water
45.9%/wt



Tallow Am 3780
50.0 



SAG10
0.1



93% Sulfuric
4.0

















TABLE 3







Example 3










INGREDIENT
%/WT














Diethylene Glycol
17.80



NP-10
50.00



AU391
30.00



93% Sulfuric Acid
2.00



SAG 10 [
0.20









Claims
  • 1. A method for improving glyphosate efficacy comprising: a. providing a concentrated solution comprising sulfuric acid and tallow amine ethoxylate;b. diluting the concentrated solution from ¼ to 2 percent v/v with water comprising cations to form a diluted solution; andc. adding glyphosate to the diluted solution of step b.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the diluted solution results from combination of 1 quart to 2 gallons of the concentrated solution to 100 gallons of the water comprising cations.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the diluted solution results from combination of 1 quart to 1 gallon of the concentrated solution to 100 gallons of the water comprising cations.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the diluted solution results from combination of 1 quart to 2 quarts of the concentrated solution to 100 gallons of the water comprising cations.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the diluted solution has a pH above the PKa2 of glyphosate.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the diluted solution does not contain ammonium sulfate (AMS).
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein better glyphosate efficacy is provided in comparison to 5-20 pounds AMS per 100 gallons of water.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the improvement in glyphosate efficacy is measureable in percent control of annual bluegrass.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the water comprising cations of step b comprises more than 100 ppm to 150 ppm of cations.
  • 10. The method of claim 4, wherein the water comprising cations of step b comprises between 150 ppm to 250 ppm of cations.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/796,638, filed Feb. 20, 2020, entitled “Manufacture and Use of Agricultural Spray Adjuvants for Hard Water Conditions”. U.S. application Ser. No. 16/796,638, filed Feb. 20, 2020, is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/138,659, filed Sep. 21, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,568,319. U.S. application Ser. No. 16/138,659 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/611,936, filed Jun. 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,104,886. U.S. application Ser. No. 15/611,936 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/853,781, filed May 26, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,668,471. U.S. application Ser. No. 10/853,781 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/473,540, filed May 28, 2003. Each of the applications referenced above are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (36)
Number Name Date Kind
4722986 Young Feb 1988 A
5078782 Nielsen et al. Jan 1992 A
5116401 Young May 1992 A
5149355 Young Sep 1992 A
5302579 Young Apr 1994 A
5389598 Berk et al. Feb 1995 A
5411944 Young May 1995 A
5612285 Arnold Mar 1997 A
5683958 Berger et al. Nov 1997 A
5795847 Nielsen Aug 1998 A
5877112 Roberts et al. Mar 1999 A
6180566 Nielsen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6369001 Jimoh Apr 2002 B1
6541424 Roberts et al. Apr 2003 B2
6803345 Herold et al. Oct 2004 B2
6906004 Parrish et al. Jun 2005 B2
7094735 Herold et al. Aug 2006 B2
8759256 Parrish et al. Jun 2014 B2
9237746 Parrish et al. Jan 2016 B2
9668471 Parrish Jun 2017 B2
10104886 Parrish Oct 2018 B2
20020107149 Volgas et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020160916 Volgas et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030087764 Pallas et al. May 2003 A1
20030104943 Lennon et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030144147 Herold et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030148889 Herold et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153461 Parrish et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153462 Herold et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040127364 Herold et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167032 Volgas et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050170967 Parrish et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060205601 Herold et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060270557 Volgas et al. Nov 2006 A1
20190183115 Parrish Jun 2019 A1
20200187495 Parrish Jun 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0253676 Jan 1988 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
Acid Collins English Dictionary [online] retrieved on Feb. 24, 2018 from:https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ dictionary/english/acid; 9 pages. (Year: 2018).
Bohn et al. (1985) Soil Chemistry—Wiley Interscience 2nd Ed. pp. 241-243.
BSCS Biology (2002) “Acid Deposition Has Many Harmful Effects,” Rutgers University Press: 22.17, 1 pp.
Buhler et al. (1983) “Effect of Water Quality, Carrier Volume, and Acid on Glyphosate Phytotoxicity,” Weed Science 31(2): 163-169.
Carlson et al. (1984) “Comparative Phytotoxicity of Glyphosate, SC-0224, SC-0545, and HOE-00661,” Weed Science (32):841-844.
COX (2000) Parts 1 and 2 of “Glyphosate Factsheet,” Journal of Pesticide Reform 108(3): 38 pp.
Greenhouse Product News (1999) “Water Chemistry as it Applies to pH and Alkalinity”.
“Gunsmoke,” (2009) Loveland Products, 2 pp.
Hartzler (2001) R. Extension Bulletin, Iowa State University “Role of AMS with glyphosate products”.
Kessler (2005) Alabama Cooperative Extension System ANR-1158 “Water Quality Management for Greenhouse Production” (previously cited as David Wm. Reed. (1996) Water Quality Management for Greenhouse Production, Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL, ISBN: 1-883052-12-2).
Lawrence (Sep. 2004) “Amines: Synthesis, Properties and Applications,” Cambridge University Press, p. 50.
Nalewaja et al. (1991) “Salt Antagonism of Glyphosate,” Weed Science 39: 622-628.
Nalewaja et al. (1993) Pesticide Sci. 38:77-84 “Influence of Diammonium Sulfate and Other Salts on Glyphosate Phytotoxicity”.
Petroff (2000) Pesticide Education Specialist, Montana State University Extension Service “Water Quality and Pesticide Performance”.
Petroff (Apr. 2003), Pesticide Education Specialist, Montana State University Extension Service “Water Effects on Pesticide Performance”.
The American Heritage Dictionary (1982) “include,” 3 pp.
Thelen et al. (1995) Weed Science 43(4):541-548 “The Basis for the Hard-Water Antagonism of Glyphosate Activity”.
THOMAS (2000) “Fats and Fatty Oils,” Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 14: 1-71.
Tush et al. (2016) “Polyoxyethylene Tallow Amine, a Glyphosate Formulation Adjuvant: Soil Adsorption Characteristics, Degradation Profile, and Occurrence on Selected Soils from Agricultural Fields in Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, and Missouri,” Environmental Science & Technology 50: 5781-5789.
“Univar Corp Van Waters and Rogers Inc—SAG 10 Silicone Antifoam Emulsion—6850-00F041133,” retrieved May 1, 2016 from http://www.hazard.com/msds/f2/bxn/bxndk.html; 3 pages.
Williams et al. (2000) “Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its Active Ingredient, Glyphosate, for Humans,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 31: 117-165.
Wyrill III et al. (1977) “Glyphosate Toxicity to Common Milkweed and Hemp Dogbane as Influenced by Surfactants,” Weed Science 25(3): 275-287.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/853,781, filed May 26, 2004.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/611,936, filed Jun. 2, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/138,659, filed Sep. 21, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/796,638, filed Feb. 20, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210022336 A1 Jan 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60473540 May 2003 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 16796638 Feb 2020 US
Child 17064904 US
Parent 16138659 Sep 2018 US
Child 16796638 US
Parent 15611936 Jun 2017 US
Child 16138659 US
Parent 10853781 May 2004 US
Child 15611936 US