Flow controls are important in many industries. Whether found on process lines, gas distribution networks, or other systems that carry flowing material, flow controls like valve assemblies (or “control valves” or “control valve assemblies”) are vital to regulate material flow within set parameters or, in case of problems, shut-off flow altogether. In this regard, control valve assemblies may include a valve that couples in-line with the system to receive a flow of material. The valve may have components that move (e.g., translate, rotate, etc.) to restrict or permit this flow. An actuator often accompanies the valve. The actuator provides force necessary to cause this movement. Instruments are often necessary to operate the actuator. These instruments may reside as part of a panel or “control station” found at a location that is remote from the pipe or pipeline. This location permits an end user to access components that control, for example, pneumatics to energize (or de-energize) the actuator. At the same time, distance between the station and the actuator removes the end user from potential harm or hazardous conditions that may prevail at or near the actuator.
The subject matter of this disclosure discusses improvements to these control stations. Of particular interest herein are embodiments with structure that simplifies construction to allow end users to flexibly arrange components together for operability. However, the proposed structure is robust enough to adapt to a particular installation or application and still meet rigorous performance demands.
Reference is now made briefly to the accompanying drawings, in which.
Where applicable, like reference characters designate identical or corresponding components and units throughout the several views, which are not to scale unless otherwise indicated. The embodiments disclosed herein may include elements that appear in one or more of the several views or in combinations of the several views. Moreover, methods are exemplary only and may be modified by, for example, reordering, adding, removing, and/or altering the individual stages.
Opportunities to reduce costs of manufacture are welcome for products in nearly every industry. For heavy-duty valve assemblies, savings must balance with trade-offs in design that could compromise safety or performance. Changes in materials or construction, for example, undergo rigorous scrutiny to ensure that these valve assemblies still meet operational specifications. On the other hand, strategic decisions can address aspects of designs that go a long way to make the product less expensive, while at the same time offering something that is of the same or better quality to customers.
The discussion below describes embodiments of a control or instrument assembly for heavy-duty valve assemblies that adopts such strategic improvements. The embodiments may leverage structure that accommodates components, like air filters, pressure regulators, and shutoffs. These components outfit the assembly to operate effectively as a station for an end user (e.g., a technician) to access controls necessary to remotely operate an actuator that moves a corresponding valve. At least one advantage of the proposed design is to eliminate secondary processes (e.g., machining, welding, etc.) typical of activities necessary to complete assembly of these types of systems. This feature, in turn, reduces labor time and material costs to move the assembly from manufacture to installation at a customer site.
Broadly, the embodiments simplify the control assembly 100. Practice to date often employs weldments that require secondary processing (e.g., drilling) to provide adequate measures to fasten items in position. These measures may utilize mounting holes that are pre-fabricated as part of a supplier-provided bracket that accompanies, for example, a filter or control handle assembly. The embodiments herein alleviate the need for these secondary processes, particularly as relates to mounting the control components 114.
The flow control 102 may be configured to regulate flow of material 110. These configurations may connect in-line with pipes or pipelines above or below ground. Hydrocarbon operations are known to leverage these devices to regulate flow of oil & natural gas from points of extraction to process facilities or, even, within the process facilities themselves. The flow often travels through the pipes at high pressure. So the flow control 102 needs to leverage components with robust construction. For example, the actuator 104 may embody a pneumatic device that can generate upwards of 800,000 in/lbs. This pneumatic device may couple with the valve 106 to change position of a closure component (e.g., a ball or disc) to restrict flow of the material 110. The closure component may reside in a casing with flanged ends that may mount to the conduit 108. Often, the flow control 102 may incorporate a spring or spring-loaded cartridge to allow for “spring-return” of the closure component as a fail-safe.
The instrument panel 112 may be configured to operate the actuator 104 to manage flow of material 110. These configurations may couple with the pneumatic device, as well as with other mechanics and electronics on the flow control 102. This feature permits active adjustment of the closure member where necessary, although static positioning of the closure member to maintain “regular” or “consistent” flow is often the norm. In this regard, the instrument panel 112 may use feedback from certain connections to monitor operation of the flow control 102. These connections may provide data, like temperature or pressure, which is pertinent to understand operation of the actuator 104 or components of the valve 106.
The control components 114 may be configured to outfit the instrument panel 112 for its control and monitor functions. These configurations may embody individual devices or combinations thereof. The devices can serve to regulate flow of operating fluids (e.g., gasses and liquids) to operate the pneumatic device. Others may serve to indicate status of these operating fluids, the valve 106, and the flow of material 110. Still other may serve to override operation of the actuator 104 or the valve 106, for example, in situations where loss of pressure of the operating fluid prevents appropriate positioning of the closure member.
The main support 116 may be configured to hold some or all of the devices that provide controls for the flow control 102. These configurations may embody a device, like a cabinet or stand. These devices may arrange as part of the flow control 102 or as stand-alone structure, for example, that can mount to a wall. This feature may locate the controls at or in proximity to the valve 106. Preference might also require that the main support 116 is in a location that is remote from the valve 106. This location may satisfy certain safety requirements, such as those that relate to hazardous areas. This feature may make the control components 114 readily accessible to an end user.
The mounting substrate 118 may be configured to reside in or on these devices. These configurations may leverage designs that avoid manufacture and assembly constraints that are typical of prior practices. Suitable designs may include pre-formed or fabricated pieces. These pieces may incorporate mounting features (e.g., holes, slots, apertures, etc.). This construction provides a standardized interface that is consistent from assembly to assembly and, moreover, independent of the type(s) of control components 114 that are necessary to operate the flow control 102.
The modular mounting system 120 may be configured to secure the control components 114 to this standardized interface. These configurations may also embody pre-formed or fabricated pieces, like brackets, hooks, and plates, to name a few. These pieces can connect directly to the control components 114 or, alternatively, secure to any corresponding mounting hardware for the same.
The thin plate 122 may provide adequate support for control component 114. The piece or pieces of the body 124 should have mechanical properties, like stiffness, so that the control components 114 may hang or cantilever from surfaces 126, 128. Die or laser cut techniques may be useful to form the shape, as well as to perforate the body 124 with openings 144, 146 for ease of manufacture.
The assembly openings 144 can help simply assembly of the control assembly 100. Examples may embody elongate slots that penetrate through the material of the body 124. These slots may extend in a first direction, for example, between the sides 132, although the design may arrange the slots to extend between the sides 136 or at any angle to either of the sides 132, 134, as well. As also shown, the body 124 may include space or gaps may separate adjacent slots from one another in a second direction, which may be perpendicular to the first direction. This feature can populate the mounting area 140 with a plurality of the slots. In use, the modular mounting system 120 may couple with one or more of these slots to secure control components 114.
The mounting openings 146 may provide points of attachment for the body 124. These points may embody through-holes to receive bolts or screws. It may benefit the design for some of these holes to include threads, as well. In one implementation, these through-holes align with structure (e.g., openings, pins, fasteners) found on the mounting structure 118. When in position, this structure serves as point to attach or secure the body 124, thus providing a customizable interface on the mounting structure 118 to receive the control components 114.
The mounting brackets 164 may support one or more of the plates 122. Threaded or unthreaded holes may populate the brackets 164 to receive fasteners that secure the plates 122, shown here as strips 148. The fasteners may penetrate through slots 150 and through-holes 152 into the corresponding threaded or unthreaded holes in the mounting brackets 164. Multiple holes on the brackets 164 may allow for variations in the position of the strips 148. In one implementation, two of the strips 148 are show on the “front” and one on the “back” of the control assembly 100. But the design may accommodate more or less as necessary, for example, by increasing or decreasing the length of the brackets 164.
In light of the foregoing discussion, this disclosure describes improvements to control structure for heavy duty actuators. These improvements provide structure to facilitate final assembly of control stations. This structure affords more flexibility in design and integration of control components, while at the same time avoiding post fabrication machining and other processes that can add costs in parts and labor to the overall manufactured product.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. An element or function recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural said elements or functions, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. References to “one embodiment” of the claimed invention should not be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features. Furthermore, the claims are but some examples that define the patentable scope of the invention. This scope may include and contemplate other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
Examples appear below that include certain elements or clauses one or more of which may be combined with other elements and clauses describe embodiments contemplated within the scope and spirit of this disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 62/536,778, filed on Jul. 25, 2017, and entitled “IMPROVING MANUFACTURE OF REMOTE CONTROL STATIONS FOR USE TO OPERATE ACTUATORS ON A VALVE ASSEMBLY,” and to U.S. Ser. No. 62/560,956, filed on Sep. 20, 2017, and entitled “IMPROVING MANUFACTURE OF REMOTE CONTROL STATIONS FOR USE TO OPERATE ACTUATORS ON A VALVE ASSEMBLY.” The content of these applications is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3034844 | Anderson et al. | May 1962 | A |
3751127 | Black, Jr. et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3923161 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4008931 | Kennedy, Jr. et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4297966 | Liberman | Nov 1981 | A |
4352532 | Hardin | Oct 1982 | A |
4372410 | Loken et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4708160 | Sharp et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5046789 | Lee | Sep 1991 | A |
5088571 | Burry et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5257583 | Koenig | Nov 1993 | A |
5364159 | Kelman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5484221 | Decoux | Jan 1996 | A |
5738140 | Mann | Apr 1998 | A |
5810031 | Evans | Sep 1998 | A |
5823602 | Kelman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6076543 | Johnson | Jun 2000 | A |
6484747 | Bridgers | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6536614 | Hsia et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6560106 | Ivey et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6609336 | Matsubara | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6843543 | Ramesh | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7039965 | Ismert | May 2006 | B1 |
7265966 | Dudley | Nov 2007 | B2 |
8003899 | Wenlong et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8142705 | Breest et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8850748 | Zimmermann et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9109354 | Toubia et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9482780 | Haas et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9502874 | Gagne | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20050067180 | Dinh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20100128448 | Wenlong | May 2010 | A1 |
20100242645 | McIlroy et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120006425 | Hayashi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120192964 | Shikata | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120255710 | Maselli et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310119 | Salo Darder | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140109990 | Brashear | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150184772 | Inagaki et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160238349 | White et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203537692 | Apr 2014 | CN |
203637953 | Jun 2014 | CN |
3899123 | Mar 2007 | JP |
5972294 | Jul 2016 | JP |
2016-148436 | Aug 2016 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/043210 dated Oct. 22, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190032810 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62536778 | Jul 2017 | US | |
62560956 | Sep 2017 | US |