1. Field of the Invention
The instant disclosure relates to a manufacturing method of a porous composite film; more particularly, to a manufacturing method of a porous composite film used for separating the cathode and anode inside a lithium battery.
2. Description of Related Art
Lithium batteries are batteries that have lithium metal or lithium compounds as an anode. There are two types of lithium batteries: disposable and rechargeable. Because lithium has very high chemical reactivity, the condition for processing, storing, and using lithium is very strict. As a result, lithium batteries have long been neglected for industrial use. However, with the development in microelectronics towards the end of the 20th century, many miniaturized electronic devices are produced. Accordingly, a higher standard is demanded regarding the power source. Lithium batteries thus become more widely demanded.
The first lithium battery for use is developed by Sony in 1992. The usage of lithium batteries allows size reduction for many portable consumer electronic devices such as mobile phones, laptop computers, etc. Plus, lithium cells will provide much longer life. Since lithium batteries do not have cadmium, the lithium batteries are more environmental friendly than nickel-cadmium batteries. Other advantages of lithium batteries include portability, easy to assemble, having high energy density, and negligible amount of noise and gas. These advantages make lithium batteries a popular choice for electronic applications.
Lithium batteries include electrodes, an electrolyte, a separation film, and an outer case. The separation film is disposed between the electrodes to separate the cathode and anode. The purpose is to prevent shorting due to inadvertent chemical interactions between the electrodes. In addition, the separation film has many pores for ions to flow therethrough in forming a conductive passage.
While recharging, dendritic crystal growth of the lithium metal tends to appear on the surfaces of the electrodes. The sharp dendritic crystal structure may penetrate the separation film disposed between the electrodes and cause shorting inside the cell. The shorting of the cell results in thermal runaway and reduces its life cycle. To prevent the aforementioned condition from occurring, the separation film must be strong enough to withstand puncture.
In terms of safety in using lithium batteries, how to increase puncture resistance for the separation film in lowering the likelihood of shorting and thermal runaway is an important topic to be addressed by industrial manufacturers.
The object of the instant disclosure is to enhance puncture-resistance of the separation film inside a lithium battery. By achieving this object, the lithium battery would be safer to use, with shorting and thermal runaway less likely to occur.
To achieve the above object, the instant disclosure provides a manufacturing method of a porous composite film. The manufacturing method includes processing a first porous film and a second porous film. The first porous film defines a first stretching direction. The first porous film is arranged along the first stretching direction. Similarly, the second porous film defines a second stretching direction. The second porous film is arranged along the second stretching direction. Thus, the porous composite film having a pre-determined tension is formed. Specifically, the manufacturing method includes the following steps: a) providing a pressing unit, a film-shaping unit, and a cooling unit; b) intersecting the first and second stretching directions at an angle; c) stacking the first and second porous films to form a half-finished porous composite film; d) pressing the half-finished porous composite film by the pressing unit at a temperature T1 and a tension S1; e) shaping the half-finished porous composite film by the film-shaping unit under a temperature T2 to thermally relieve the pressing force against the half-finished porous composite film; and f) maintaining the half-finished porous composite film at a pre-determined tension S3 by the cooling unit at a temperature T3. A pair of mathematical expressions are presented herein associated with the abovementioned manufacturing method, namely:
The above described manufacturing method further includes the following step: cooling the half-finished porous composite film until reaching the room temperature by the cooling unit, where the cooling rate is 10˜100° C./min.
Furthermore, for the above described manufacturing method, the pressure P1 exerted by the pressing unit on the first and second porous films is 0.01˜0.37 kgf/cm2.
Moreover, for the above described manufacturing method, the temperature T1 is in the range of 60˜140° C., and the temperature T2 is in the range of 100˜160° C., where T2−T1=5˜50° C.
For the above described manufacturing method, a relieving parameter G is defined by the film-shaping unit, where:
For the above described manufacturing method, the tension S1 is in the range of 10˜500 kgf/cm2. The pre-determined tension S3 increases at a rate of 10˜100 kgf/cm2 per minute.
Based on the above described manufacturing method, a separation film having greater puncture-resistance for lithium batteries can be provided. The manufactured separation film is also tear-resistant and having suitable pore size for venting.
In order to further appreciate the characteristics and technical contents of the instant disclosure, references are hereunder made to the detailed descriptions and appended drawings in connection with the instant disclosure. However, the appended drawings are merely shown for exemplary purposes, rather than being used to restrict the scope of the instant disclosure.
Please refer to
To address the issue of dendritic crystal growth by the separation film on the anode side in preventing thermal runaway, the instant disclosure provides additional processing steps for the conventional porous film 90 to increase the safety of the lithium battery. In other words, the porous film 90 is additionally processed to enhance its puncture-resistance. By preventing the separation film from being punctured by the dendritic crystal growth, thermal runaway can be avoided. Please refer to
Then, for a temperature T1 and under a tension 51, the half-finished porous composite film 95A is pressed by the pressing unit 11 (step X4). Thus, the first and second porous films 91, 92 are tightly packed to each other without being easily separated. The temperature T1 is in the range of 60˜140° C., more preferably in the range of 80˜120° C. Whereas the tension S1 is in the range of 10˜500 kgf/cm2, more preferably in the range of 30˜200 kgf/cm2. The pressing time t1 at the temperature T1 and under the tension S1 is in the range of 0.1˜10 sec. Preferably, the pressing unit 11 heats the half-finished porous composite film 95A by convective or microwave heat transfer. Moreover, the first and second porous films 91 and 92 are bonded by the pressing unit 11 at a pressure P1. The pressure P1 is in the range of 0.01˜0.37 kgf/cm2. In addition, the pressing unit 11 also utilizes a pair of compression rollers 113 to implement the pressing operation. The compression rollers 113 may be elastic rollers (e.g., rubber rollers or silicon rollers) or mirror finished rollers.
To examine the effect of temperature T1 and pressure P1 on the “stripping force” of the first and second porous films 91, 92 or the “air permeation time” of the half-finished porous composite film 95A, a verification process is performed based on different combinations (A˜I) of temperature T1 and pressure P1. The “stripping force” represents the force necessary to separate the first and second porous films 91, 92. The greater the stripping force, the more difficult to separate the first and second porous films 91, 92. Whereas the “air permeation time” represents the time it takes a given volume of air (100 cc) to flow through the half-finished porous composite film 95A. The time value is used to determine the pore size of the half-finished porous composite film 95A. The experimental results of the verification process is shown hereinbelow:
As shown in the above table, for groups A, D, and G, because of the smaller pressures P1, the stripping forces for the first and second porous films 91, 92 are too small, namely in the range of 6˜12 g. Meanwhile, for groups C, F, and I, the pressures P1 are too large, such that the air permeation time are too long, namely in the range of 864˜1586 sec. In other words, the statistical data indicates the porosity of the half-finished porous composite film 95A for groups C, F and I are too low. Based on past industrial experience, the standard half-finished porous composite film 95A typically has a stripping force greater than 50 g and an air permeation time in the range of 300˜700 sec. Based on the parameters T1 and P1, the experimental data suggests the following: the temperature T1 and pressure P1 are inversely related. Therefore, if both the temperature T1 and the pressure P1 take on larger values, the pores are negatively affected. Namely, the decrease in porosity results in an increase of air permeation time for the half-finished porous composite film 95A. On the other hand, if both the temperature T1 and the pressure P1 take on a lesser values, the corresponding stripping force of the first and second porous films 91, 92 decreases (easier to separate).
After the half-finished porous composite film 95A has been pressed, the film-shaping unit 12 is utilized to thermally relieve the pressing force against the half-finished porous composite film 95A at a temperature T2 (step X5). The temperature T2 is less than the melting point of the porous composite film 95. For the instant step, the relieving operation is done by: heating the half-finished porous composite film 95A at a temperature lower than the melting point of the half-finished porous composite film 95A. Based on experiments, the temperature T2 is preferably in the range of 100˜160° C., more preferably in the range of 130˜150° C. The heating time t2 is in the range of 1˜600 sec, more preferably in the range of 20˜300 sec. More preferably, the temperature difference between T2 and T1 is in the range of 5˜50° C. In other words, T2−T1=5˜50° C., and more preferably T2−T1=10˜20° C.
To make sure the temperatures T1 and T2 are properly selected for the relieving process, a relieving parameter G is defined to satisfy the following expression:
The temperature T2 is greater than T1. The relieving parameter G indicates the required relieving force based on the temperature difference between T1 and T2 for the half-finished porous composite film 95A to reduce the shrinking ratio for the finished product. To examine the effect of the relieving parameter G on the half-finished porous composite film 95A, a verification process is conducted based on various temperatures T1 and T2. The results are shown hereinbelow:
As shown in the above table, the temperature difference (i.e., T2−T1) between the pressing unit 11 and the film-shaping unit 12 significantly affects the shrinking ratio and the air permeation time of the half-finished porous composite film 95A. Generally speaking, if over-relieved (i.e., G is too large), the pores will shrink causing the air permeation time to be too long. On the other hand, if under-relieved (i.e., G is too small), the shrinking ratio will be too high during the subsequent heat-resistant test. Thereby, the relieving parameter G should be maintained at a suitable range. For example, as indicated by group 2 shown in the above table, an under-relieved half-finished porous composite film 95A has a shrinking ratio up to 6.2% for the heat-resistant test. In contrast, as indicated by groups 3, 7, and 8, at least 960 seconds are needed for 100 cc of air to flow through an over-relieved half-finished porous composite film 95A. Whereas for group 6, the experimental result shows if the temperature difference between T1 and T2 is too large, the porosity is adversely affected. Therefore, based on the experimental results, if the relieving parameter G is in the range of 1˜32%, the shrinking ratio, the air permeation time, and the pores of the porous composite film 95 can be adequately maintained, to achieve optimization. It is worth noting the shrinking ratio of the half-finished porous composite film 95A is in the machine direction.
To further verify the experimental results shown in the above table, the inventors have obtained microscopic images of the half-finished porous composite film 95A for group 1 and 6. These images are presented in
After the half-finished porous composite film 95A have undergone the relieving step, the cooling unit 13 is utilized to cool the half-finished porous composite film 95A at a temperature T3 and under a tension S3 (step X6). The cooling process is terminated when the half-finished porous composite film 95A has reached room temperature. The cooling rate is in the range of 10˜100° C./min., and more preferably in the range of 30˜80° C./min. The cooling time t3 is computed in seconds starting when the cooling unit 13 is activated.
Furthermore, when T1, T2, and T3 satisfy the expression shown hereinbelow, the finished porous composite film 95 would achieve a better air permeability and stripping-resistance.
When 0.2<W1<0.5, a stripping-resistance of greater than 30 g can be achieved, and the time for 100 cc of air to flow through the porous composite film 95 can be kept under 1000 sec. Same conditions can be met when 0.02<W2<16.
Furthermore, the pre-determined tension S3 of the cooling unit 13 increases at a rate of 10˜100 kgf/cm2, and more preferably at 30˜60 kgf/cm2, until the cooling process is completed.
To meet the minimum standard for using in lithium batteries as separation film, the porous composite film 95 should have the following properties: a) the puncture-resistance is at least 200 g; b) the tensile strength is at least 700 kgf/cm2; and 3) the air permeation time is in the range of 300˜700 sec. for 100 cc of air. To achieve a better air permeability and stripping-resistance, the tension for the pressing unit 11, the film-shaping unit 12, and the cooling unit 13 preferably have the following relationship: S3>S1>S2. For the instant disclosure, the cooling unit 13 utilizes a stepped cooling rate. The reason is to allow the half-finished porous composite film 95A to take shape in a gradual fashion. Thus, proper pore size and uniform pore distribution can be achieved.
After the cooling step has been completed, the manufacturing process of the porous composite film 95 is now finished. The finished porous composite film 95 has a pre-determined tension and a thickness of approximately 30 um. Based on the manufacturing method of the instant disclosure, two porous films are stacked, pressed, and heat-treated to obtain sufficient resistance against puncturing and pores suitably sized for lithium ions to flow therethough. The associated air permeability for 100 cc of air is in the range of 300˜700 seconds. The stripping force of the first and second porous films 91, 92 is at least 50 g/cm2. These aforementioned properties satisfy the qualification requirement for the separation film inside lithium batteries.
In particular, the two porous films are stacked based on different stretching directions. Then, the pressing unit 11, the film-shaping unit 12, and the cooling unit 13 are utilized to process the stacked films. The final finished product would have enhanced puncture-resistance. When the porous composite film 95 is used as separation film inside lithium batteries, the tensile strength, air permeability, porosity, and stripping resistance all meet the industrial standards.
The descriptions illustrated supra set forth simply the preferred embodiment of the instant disclosure; however, the characteristics of the instant disclosure are by no means restricted thereto. All changes, alternations, or modifications conveniently considered by those skilled in the art are deemed to be encompassed within the scope of the instant disclosure delineated by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101116860 A | May 2012 | TW | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4257997 | Soehngen et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4834838 | Klowak | May 1989 | A |
4957943 | McAllister et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5130342 | McAllister et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5143679 | Weber et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5217666 | Tamaru et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5236963 | Jacoby et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5258156 | Kurauchi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5328760 | Gillberg-LaForce | Jul 1994 | A |
5560878 | Dragoo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5681302 | Melbye et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5731074 | Nishiyama et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5834528 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858292 | Dragoo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5882518 | Yagi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5910277 | Ishino et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5968994 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6030428 | Ishino et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033509 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048607 | Hashimoto et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6096213 | Radovanovic et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6181393 | Enomoto et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6497977 | Stone et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6689421 | Patel et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6861132 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7132151 | Rasmussen | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141168 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7235203 | Sadamitsu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7407702 | Ohno et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7807287 | Kono et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820271 | Rasmussen | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7942275 | Thottupurathu | May 2011 | B2 |
7981536 | Kono et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8057718 | Lee et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118910 | Farzana et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8252450 | Takita et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8272517 | Horie et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8298465 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8323821 | Takita et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8414663 | Kimishima | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419839 | Shimatani | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449660 | Shimatani et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8491991 | Masuda et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8663530 | Horie et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8695812 | Horie et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8709640 | Kikuchi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010023014 | Patel et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020168398 | Delmotte | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030148091 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040058135 | Patel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040096744 | Sadamitsu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040161598 | Ohno et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170810 | Rasmussen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050087487 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060228540 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070116944 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070154699 | Hayashi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178324 | Masuda et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070254120 | Rasmussen | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257402 | Rasmussen | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080057388 | Kono et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080057389 | Kono et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080246189 | Kuzuhara et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090117454 | Takita et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123822 | Takita et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090148761 | Kikuchi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090226813 | Takita et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090226814 | Takita et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253032 | Takita et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090269656 | Takita et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274955 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100021808 | Takita et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100206660 | Horie et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209745 | Kimishima | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100242733 | Shimatani | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295511 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110112492 | Bharti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114249 | Rasmussen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117439 | Yamada et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110166243 | Kikuchi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192283 | Shimatani et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110195295 | Manago et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223486 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244013 | Mrozinski et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120088149 | Ishihara et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120156568 | Kia et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120189815 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120273114 | Takita et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130029126 | Yen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130040184 | Busch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130052539 | Azais et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130097982 | Inui et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099411 | Horie et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116355 | Kang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157035 | Uehara et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130209892 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130344375 | Brant et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140004295 | Kiederle | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140030468 | Kiederle et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140087104 | Kierderle et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094076 | Mrozinski et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002037627 | Feb 2002 | JP |
WO 9801502 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 2009072373 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Abstract of JP 2002-307627 (May 14, 2014). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130299060 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |