The present invention relates to manufacturing methods and apparatus for hot rolling sheet metal. In particular, the invention provides manufacturing methods and apparatus having enhanced lubrication for improving the surface quality of rolled sheet metal, such as hot rolled aluminum.
In one aspect, the invention provides manufacturing methods and a rolling mill apparatus having enhanced targeted lubrication to improve the surface quality of rolled sheet metal and efficiency in production. The invention is particularly useful in hot rolling of aluminum in a rolling mill having multiple stands of rollers.
According to certain aspects, the invention provides delivery of a lubricant, often a poorly-emulsified lubricant, to one or more lubrication nozzles for discharge to the rollers, preferably directed toward the roll nip or bite (e.g. bite nozzles). In one aspect, the poorly-emulsified lubricant is delivered only to specific mill stands, rolls or headers. In certain embodiments, the poorly-emulsified lubricant may be delivered to different mill roll stacks, rolls, or headers in different amounts or compositions. This targeted lubrication allows for improved control of lubrication (e.g. increased or decreased friction) at specific mill stands as needed. In general, the delivery rate of an additional lubricant or lubricant component should be such that it does not exceed the daily addition rate of make-up lubricant. Targeted lubrication with a poorly-emulsified lubricant can rapidly improve the surface quality of rolled aluminum and improve consistency in lubrication during the rolling processing. This feature may also be used to overcome various other mill control problems by either decreasing or increasing friction between the work roll and aluminum strip surfaces as required to control differential friction between aluminum and the top versus bottom work rolls or tension problems created by skidding at some mill stands.
Embodiments of the invention relate to a rolling mill for hot rolling metal, particularly hot rolling of aluminum with a rolling mill having multiple stands of roll stacks and methods for rolling metal, as described herein.
The rolling of metals, such as aluminum, in hot-strip mills is a type of metal forming process that is well known. In a rolling metal forming process, metal stock is conveyed through a pair of rolls known as a roll stack and rolled into a coil or cut into sheets. The type of rolling process is classified according to the temperature of the metal rolled. If the metal temperature exceeds its recrystallization temperature during rolling, the process is termed hot rolling; if the temperature remains below the recrystallization temperature, then the process is referred to as cold rolling. Typically, the metal is rolled through multiple roll stands or stacks of rolls, the sheet of metal reducing in thickness as it passes through each stack and forming a smooth, finished surface. The different stacks may have different configuration or operating condition or applied pressure depending on the process.
In order to provide a consistent level of friction, a lubricant-in-water emulsion having a relatively low concentration of lubricant is used as a cooling fluid, which is then discharged throughout all nozzles of the cooling system. The emulsified lubricant provides a thin layer of lubricant on the surface of the rolls during rolling. Because the water and lubricant are typically immiscible, to prevent separation and ensure a consistent amount of lubricant delivered with the cooling water, emulsifiers are used to form an emulsification to ensure a more uniform distribution of lubricant within the cooling water. One drawback of such conventional techniques is that certain formulations may require more emulsifiers than would be desirable, since the presence of emulsifiers may reduce overall effectiveness of the lubricant and further increase costs. Another drawback is that the lubricant emulsion is discharged from all the cooling nozzles with limited ability to modify the concentration of lubricant as needed for a particular roller stack or product rolled. Furthermore, typical maintenance of hot mill coolants requires partial dumping of the in-use coolant, as it becomes contaminated. This results in lubricant being wasted proportionally to its concentration in the cooling fluid.
To avoid depositing more lubricant than necessary, a cooling fluid having a relatively low level of emulsified lubricant is generally used. Even when using such techniques, variations in friction may still occur, leading to a poor surface quality of the rolled metal and/or excessive rolling loads with excessive friction or skidding of the work rolls on the metal with inadequate friction. In many conventional systems, once excessive friction or difficulties are observed, an additional amount of lubricant (e.g. oil, synthetic oil, or the like) is injected into the common mill supply coolant line sometimes without emulsifiers for discharge through all the coolant headers and nozzles, a process commonly known as “juicing”). This temporarily addresses the problem by increasing the lubrication layer, thereby reducing friction in the stack roller in which additional lubrication is desired, as well as in each other roller stack. Since the lubricant is incorporated into the cooling fluid throughout the cooling system, in order to avoid exceeding the desirable concentration of lubricant in the coolant, addition of lubricant in this manner can generally only be done for a limited duration or at a very low “juicing rate.” For example, as shown in the experimental results in Table 1, the addition of 330 gallons of the Juicing Lubricant (JL=hot rolling formulation often without emulsifiers) on the suction side of the coolant supply pump over 15 minutes introduces into the cooling fluid flowing to the mill only about 6.25% more oil in form of loose oil droplets. Such a direct lubrication effect, lasts between 10-15 minutes, which is the time equivalent of rolling 2 coils of sheet metal. With a higher Juice Lubricant pumping rate, larger increases in the amount of lubricant flowing to the mill can be produced, for example, adding 9.1% more lubricant over 10 minutes.
Considering the above, rolling with conventional lubrication methods increases costs and decreases throughput, as well as complicates the rolling process since the rolling of some products must be delayed and adjusted when problems associated with insufficient lubrication are observed. This approach may also require re-work or major coolant composition adjustment. Thus, there is a need for a rolling mill apparatus and methods that provide improved consistency and control over lubrication in hot rolling of sheet metal, avoids drawbacks associated with conventional methods, and provides improved rolling without unnecessarily complicating or increasing costs and time associated with the rolling process. In addition, it would be further desirable if such methods or apparatus could be incorporated as a modification or retrofit of a conventional rolling mill.
In one aspect, the present invention allows for targeted lubrication of select roll stacks and/or bite spray nozzles of a hot rolling apparatus, which allows for more consistent lubrication and control over the lubrication in different roller stacks. The improved lubrication, allowed by embodiments of the invention, provides improved surface quality and increases throughput and efficiency in production. In certain aspects, targeted lubrication includes delivery of a poorly-emulsified lubricant (possibly but not necessarily with little or no emulsifier-agents) to lubrication nozzles directed toward the roll nip of the roller stack (bite sprays), the lubrication nozzles for a particular stack being fed by a header. Because the delivery of the additional lubricant, in these aspects, is targeted only to the bite sprays and only to the specific headers, the total amount of lubricant delivered is lower than that under present “non-targeted” juicing practices. This allows “targeted lubrication” or “juicing” to be used for a longer time period, thereby improving surface quality of a larger number of coils. For example, with a 330 GPM bite spray flow through both nozzles, the direct effect of the same 330 gallons of Juicing Lubricant can be extended to 188 minutes (assuming the injection rate producing 6.25% of additional oil as related to the oil originally-present in the coolant) or can be extended to 125 minutes with the injection rate producing 9.1% of additional oil. These increases in the duration of the effect would allow improved rolling daily production of can-end stock (CES) coils or other surface sensitive alloys that usually require conventional juicing techniques.
Embodiments of the invention, in accordance with the above described aspects, are depicted in
The rolling mill configuration in
In an operating model of an example rolling mill, the system design assumes 330 GPM bite spray coolant flow and up to 3 GPM injection of the poorly-emulsfiable oil (“juice lubricant”) at an operating pressure of 150 psi. Given these operating characteristics, a static mixer with a 4″ diameter and a 40″ length allows sufficient incorporation of the injected oil and cooling water to form a loose-emulsification for discharge through the lubrication nozzles. The calculated linear velocity of coolant flow through the mixer would be 8.3 ft/s with a pressure drop 5.5 psi. Generally, a 1 ft/s minimum flow rate is recommended to maintain turbulent flow in the static mixer, although for most blending applications a 2-3 ft/s flow rate should be sufficient. In some embodiments, a 7-8 ft/s flow rate might be particularly suited to create liquid-liquid dispersions. It is appreciated that mixers of various sizes and shapes may be used in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Generally, a pump 20 capable of delivering 3 gallon per minute lubricant flow at 170 psi pressure would be suitable to inject the neat lubricant in front of the static mixer, although various other pumps may be used depending on the particular system and associated operational characteristics. Prior to the lubricant injection port, part of the mill coolant stand supply stream is split from the typical 6″ or 8″ stand coolant supply line into a separate bite spray supply line of the smaller diameter, such as a diameter of 4,″ which is equipped with the static mixer pipe 22. The juicing lubricant is supplied from the neat lubricant tank and injected into the bite spray supply line right upstream of the static mixer. Typically, this utilizes a specially-selected pump having the appropriate pressure and a precisely-controlled flow rate. The lubricant is mixed with the coolant in the static mixer 22 and then carried by the bite spray coolant stream to the header 23 and discharged through the bite spray nozzles 25.
In other aspects, the milling system is adapted to allow targeted delivery of the lubricant between two or more roller stacks of a rolling mill. In some embodiments, the system may include multiple lubricant pumps, each fluidly coupled with the lubrication nozzles at one or more stacks or at different roller stacks. This feature allows delivery of differing amounts and/or type of lubricants to one or more select stacks. In other embodiments, the system may include one or more additional valves between the lubricant pump and the lubrication nozzles associated with each stack, such that adjustment of the one or more additional valves allows for differing amounts/concentrations of lubricant to be delivered to one or more stacks, to different stacks or to be varied during the rolling process as needed. Adjustment of the one or more valves may be performed either by user input command or by an automatic control algorithm based on various operating characteristics.
Since the lubricant delivery is targeted, the lubricant can be delivered where it will have the largest impact on the rolled metal surface quality and rolling performance of the rolling mill. For example, reroll surface quality on most mills can be markedly improved by aiming the bite/lubrication coolant sprays into the roll nip. In addition, during rolling only some stands may operate under lubrication starvation condition, leading to poor surface finish. Based on the empirical data shown in the graphs in
Many conventional hot rolling mills utilize cooling and bite lubrication spray nozzle banks In such rolling mills, both types of nozzles are fed from a common cavity in the coolant header. In one aspect, the invention provides a modified header in which the header chamber and control logic may be modified to allow separate feeds to the cooling spray cavity and to the bite spray cavity, valves and nozzles. For example, the modified header may include a separation within the header cavity to define a first portion separate from a second portion such that input of cooling water into the first portion of the header cavity that feeds the cooling discharge nozzles does not mix with lubrication fluid in the second portion that feeds the bite lubrication nozzles. As shown in the example of
In another aspect, the system may include additional modifications to provide targeted roll bite lubrication in conventional mills that do not already have bite sprays. On mills without bite sprays and with level control of cooling, the “targeted lubrication” concept can be explored in only limited way by injecting additional lubricant into lines feeding entry headers of the individual stands. In this case the lubrication effect would likely be diminished and its duration reduced in proportion to the coolant flow rate through these headers, as shown below in Table 2. To accommodate additional coolant flow without excessive pressure drop, the size of the static mixer may be increased. For example, a static mixer device having a 6″ diameter and a length of 60″ may be used to accommodate 1100 GPM coolant flow with 11 psi pressure drop, and a size of the oil injector pump can be increased to handle 6-9 GPM of additional poorly-emulsified oil.
The advantages of targeted lubricant delivery can be further realized by directing or focusing lubricant delivery on the rolling nip of the rollers and metal sheet. Since conventional rolling apparatus often include lubricating nozzles that discharge generally towards the rollers and not towards the roll bite, such apparatus can be modified in accordance with aspects of the invention to further target delivery of lubricant to the nipping part or bite. For such mills that lack bite sprays and with level control of cooling, suitable headers can be engineered and installed that provide a discharge stream mixed with lubricant and directed to the roll bite.
In another aspect, the system may include two separate sections for the top and bottom rolls such that the targeted lubrication may differ between the top surface of the strip metal and the bottom surface of the strip metal during rolling. This aspect may be used to provide improved control over surface quality as well as control of friction between the top and bottom side of the slab.
As compared to the coolant emulsions (cooling fluids) used in the cooling supply line in conventional mills, delivery of a small quantity of a loose emulsion (poorly emulsified lubricant including an oil-water combination with little or no emulsifying agents) offers distinct improvements in lubrication. Particularly when delivered into the roll bite of a select roll stack, such an emulsion provides improved anti-friction properties and reroll surface quality. Studies have shown that the amount of oil delivered from oil-in-water emulsions into the tribological contact between a flat disk and a ball increases with the decreasing amount emulsifier and increasing concentration of oil, such as indicated in
As shown in
Various embodiments of the invention have been described in fulfillment of the various objectives of the invention. It should be recognized that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and adaptations thereof will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the following claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/798,769 filed Mar. 15, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61798769 | Mar 2013 | US |