Patent Grant
11033495
This disclosure relates generally to commercial manufacturing processes for making multivesicular liposomes using independently operating tangential flow filtration systems.
Bupivacaine is a versatile drug that has been shown to be efficacious for a wide variety of indications, including: local infiltration, peripheral nerve block, sympathetic nerve block, and epidural and caudal blocks. It may be used in pre-, intra- and post-operative care settings. Bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (Exparel®) has been approved in the US and Europe for use as postsurgical local analgesia and as an interscalene brachial plexus nerve block to produce postsurgical regional analgesia, providing significant long-lasting pain management across various surgical procedures. Particularly, Exparel® has had great success in the market in part due to the ability to locally administer bupivacaine multivesicular liposomes (MVLs) at the time of surgery and extend the analgesic effects relative to other non-liposomal formulations of bupivacaine. Such extended release properties of bupivacaine MVLs allow patients to control their post-operative pain without or with decreased use of opioids. Given the addictive nature of opioids and the opioid epidemic that has been affecting countries around the world, there is an urgent need for new and improved large scale productions of Exparel® to meet the substantial and growing market demand.
Some aspects of the present disclosure relate to a crossflow filtration system comprising:
Some aspects of the present disclosure relate to a process for preparing bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes in a commercial scale, the process comprising:
Some aspects of the present disclosure relate to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs) prepared by a commercial scale process, the commercial scale process comprising:
Some aspect of the present disclosure relates to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs), comprising: bupivacaine residing inside a plurality of internal aqueous chambers of the MVLs separated by lipid membranes, wherein the lipid membranes comprise 1, 2-dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC), 1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), and at least one neutral lipid; and an aqueous medium in which the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs are suspended; wherein the composition has an initial pH of about 7.0 to about 7.4, and wherein erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 23 μg/mL or less after the composition is stored at 25° C. for one month.
Some additional aspect of the present disclosure relates to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs) prepared by a commercial scale process, the commercial scale process comprising:
Some additional aspect of the present disclosure relates to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs), comprising: bupivacaine residing inside a plurality of internal aqueous chambers of the MVLs separated by lipid membranes, wherein the lipid membranes comprise 1, 2-dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC), 1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), and at least one neutral lipid; and an aqueous medium in which the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs are suspended; wherein the internal pH of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs is about 5.50.
In any aspects of the disclosure described herein, the composition of bupivacaine MVLs is suitable for human administration without further purification.
In addition to the features described above, additional features and variations will be readily apparent from the following descriptions of the drawings and exemplary embodiments. It is to be understood that these drawings depict typical embodiments, and are not intended to be limiting in scope.
Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to new and improved commercial scale manufacturing processes for making bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs). The newly developed processes provide up to 5 folds increase in final product volume as compared to the current process used for the manufacturing of Exparel®, which is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,585,838 and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The processes also allow for improved product operability. In addition, the improved and scaled up process also yields a more stabilized form of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs, having less lipid degradation byproducts, increased internal pH, and increased lysine and dextrose encapsulation.
The section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the subject matter described.
As used herein, the terms “bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes”, “bupivacaine-MVLs” or “bupivacaine MVLs” refer to a multivesicular liposome composition encapsulating bupivacaine. In some embodiments, the composition is a pharmaceutical formulation, where the bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposome particles are suspended in a liquid suspending medium to form a suspension. In some such embodiments, the BUP-MVL suspension may also include free or unencapsulated bupivacaine. In some cases, the free or unencapsulated bupivacaine may be less than about 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.2% or 0.1%, by weight of the total amount of the bupivacaine in the composition, or in a range defined by any of the two preceding values. In some embodiment, the free bupivacaine may be about 5% or less by weight of the total amount of the bupivacaine in the composition. In further embodiments, the free bupivacaine may be about 8% or less during the shelf life of the product (i.e., up to 2 years when stored at 2-8° C.).
As used herein, the term “encapsulated” means that bupivacaine is inside a liposomal particle, for example, the MVL particles, In some instances, bupivacaine may also be on an inner surface, or intercalated in a membrane, of the MVLs.
As used herein, the term “unencapsulated bupivacaine” or “free bupivacaine” refers to bupivacaine outside the liposomal particles, for example the MVL particles. For example, unencapsulated bupivacaine may reside in the suspending solution of these particles.
As used herein, the term “median particle diameter” refers to volume weighted median particle diameter of a suspension.
As used herein, a “pH adjusting agent” refers to a compound that is capable of modulating the pH of an aqueous phase.
As used herein, the terms “tonicity” and “osmolality” are measures of the osmotic pressure of two solutions, for example, a test sample and water separated by a semi-permeable membrane. Osmotic pressure is the pressure that must be applied to a solution to prevent the inward flow of water across a semi-permeable membrane. Osmotic pressure and tonicity are influenced only by solutes that cannot readily cross the membrane, as only these exert an osmotic pressure. Solutes able to freely cross the membrane do not affect tonicity because they will become equal concentrations on both sides of the membrane. An osmotic pressure provided herein is as measured on a standard laboratory vapor pressure or freezing point osmometer.
As used herein, the term “sugar” as used herein denotes a monosaccharide or an oligosaccharide. A monosaccharide is a monomeric carbohydrate which is not hydrolysable by acids, including simple sugars and their derivatives, e.g. aminosugars. Examples of monosaccharides include sorbitol, glucose, fructose, galactose, mannose, sorbose, ribose, deoxyribose, dextrose, neuraminic acid. An oligosaccharide is a carbohydrate consisting of more than one monomeric saccharide unit connected via glycosidic bond(s) either branched or in a chain. The monomeric saccharide units within an oligosaccharide can be the same or different. Depending on the number of monomeric saccharide units the oligosaccharide is a di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and so forth saccharide. In contrast to polysaccharides, the monosaccharides and oligosaccharides are water soluble. Examples of oligosaccharides include sucrose, trehalose, lactose, maltose and raffinose.
As used herein, the term “amphipathic lipids” include those having a net negative charge, a net positive charge, and zwitterionic lipids (having no net charge at their isoelectric point).
As used herein, the term “neutral lipid” refers to oils or fats that have no vesicle-forming capabilities by themselves, and lack a charged or hydrophilic “head” group. Examples of neutral lipids include, but are not limited to, glycerol esters, glycol esters, tocopherol esters, sterol esters which lack a charged or hydrophilic “head” group, and alkanes and squalenes.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. All patents, applications, published applications and other publications referenced herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety unless stated otherwise. In the event that there are a plurality of definitions for a term herein, those in this section prevail unless stated otherwise. As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, conventional methods of mass spectroscopy, NMR, HPLC, protein chemistry, biochemistry, recombinant DNA techniques and pharmacology are employed. The use of “or” or “and” means “and/or” unless stated otherwise. Furthermore, use of the term “including” as well as other forms, such as “include”, “includes,” and “included,” is not limiting. As used in this specification, whether in a transitional phrase or in the body of the claim, the terms “comprise(s)” and “comprising” are to be interpreted as having an open-ended meaning. That is, the terms are to be interpreted synonymously with the phrases “having at least” or “including at least.” When used in the context of a process, the term “comprising” means that the process includes at least the recited steps, but may include additional steps. When used in the context of a compound, composition, or device, the term “comprising” means that the compound, composition, or device includes at least the recited features or components, but may also include additional features or components.
Manufacturing Processes
Some embodiments of the present application relate to a commercial scale manufacturing process for preparing bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes. The process comprising:
In some embodiments of the process, the amphipathic lipid in the volatile water-immiscible solvent solution may be chosen from a wide range of lipids having a hydrophobic region and a hydrophilic region in the same molecule. Suitable amphipathic lipids include, but are not limited to zwitterionic phospholipids, including phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, sphingomyelins, lysophosphatidylcholines, and lysophosphatidylethanolamines; anionic amphipathic phospholipids such as phosphatidylglycerols, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, phosphatidic acids, and cardiolipins; cationic amphipathic lipids such as acyl trimethylammonium propanes, diacyl dimethylammonium propanes, stearylamine, and the like. Non-limiting exemplary phosphatidyl cholines include dioleyl phosphatidyl choline (DOPC), 1,2-dierucoyl phosphatidylcholine or 1,2-dierucoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DEPC), 1,2-didecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DDPC), 1,2-dilinoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLOPC), 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1-myristoyl-2-palmitoyl-sn-glycero 3-phosphocholine (MPPC), 1-myristoyl-2-stearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (MSPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-myristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PMPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-stearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PSPC), 1-stearoyl-2-myristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (SMPC), 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (SOPC), or 1-stearoyl-2-palmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (SPPC). Non-limiting examples of phosphatidyl glycerols include dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol or 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), 1,2-dierucoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DEPG), 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DLPG), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DMPG), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DOPG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DSPG), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (POPG), or salts thereof, for example, the corresponding sodium salts, ammonium salts, or combinations of the salts thereof. In some such embodiments, the amphipathic lipid comprises phosphatidylcholine, or phosphatidylglycerol or salts thereof, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the phosphatidyl choline is DEPC. In some embodiments, the phosphatidyl glycerol is DPPG. In some embodiments, the amphipathic lipid comprises DEPC and DPPG. In further embodiments, the DEPC and the DPPG are present in MVLs in a mass ratio of DEPC:DPPG of about 15:1 to about 20:1, or about 17:1. In further embodiments, the total DEPC and DPPG in the MVLs suspension is in a mass ratio of about 7:1 to about 10:1, or about 8:1.
In some embodiments, suitable neutral lipids in the volatile water-immiscible solvent solution may include but are not limited to triglycerides, propylene glycol esters, ethylene glycol esters, and squalene. Non-limiting exemplary triglycerides useful in the instant formulations and processes are triolein (TO), tripalmitolein, trimyristolein, trilinolein, tributyrin, tricaproin, tricaprylin (TC), and tricaprin. The fatty acid chains in the triglycerides useful in the present application can be all the same, or not all the same (mixed chain triglycerides), or all different. In one embodiment, the neutral lipid comprises or is tricaprylin. In further embodiments, the volatile water-immiscible solvent solution in step (a) of the process may further comprise cholesterol and/or a plant sterol.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the mixing in step (a) is performed using a first mixer at a high shear speed. In some embodiments, the high sheer speed is from about 1100 rpm to about 1200 rpm, for example, 1100 rpm, 1110 rpm, 1120 rpm, 1130 rpm, 1140 rpm, 1150 rpm, 1160 rpm, 1170 rpm, 1180 rpm, 1190 rpm, or 1200 rpm, or a range defined by any of the two preceding values. In some embodiment, the high sheer speed is about 1150 rpm. In some embodiments, the mixing in step (a) is performed for about 65 minutes, 66 minutes, 67 minutes, 68 minutes, 69 minutes, 70 minutes, 71 minutes, 72 minutes, 73 minutes, 74 minutes or 75 minutes. Proper mixing rate is important for forming the first emulsion droplets in a proper size range, which is important to the final product yield, the MVL particle stability and release properties. It was observed that when the mixing speed is too low or too high, the droplets formed in the first emulsion were either too big or too small. In some further embodiments, the first mixer used in step (a) of the process has a blade diameter of between about 8 inch to about 10 inch. In further embodiments, the first mixer used in step (a) of the process is not a static mixer. In further embodiments, the mixing in step (a) is performed at a temperature of about 21° C. to about 23° C.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the mixing in step (b) is performed using a second mixer at a low shear speed. In some embodiments, the low sheer speed is from about 450 rpm to about 510 rpm, for example, 450 rpm, 455 rpm, 460 rpm, 465 rpm, 470 rpm, 475 rpm, 480 rpm, 485 rpm, 490 rpm, 495 rpm, 500 rpm, 505 rpm, or 510 rpm, or a range defined by any of the two preceding values. In some embodiment, the low sheer speed is about 495 rpm. In some embodiments, the mixing in step (b) is performed for about 60 seconds, 61 seconds, 62 seconds, 63 seconds, 64 seconds, or 65 seconds. In some further embodiments, the second mixer used in step (b) of the process has a blade diameter of between about 10 inch to about 15 inch, for example, 10 inch, 11 inch, 12 inch, 13 inch, or 14 inch. In further embodiments, the second mixer used in step (b) of the process is not a static mixer. In further embodiments, the mixing in step (b) is performed at a temperature of about 21° C. to about 23° C. The water-in-oil-in water (w/o/w) second emulsion is not as stable as the first emulsion. As such, a low shear speed was used in mixing step to reduce the disruption of the spherules formed in this step. In addition, the mixing time in step (b) is also important to yield the final MVL particles in the target diameters and have the desired release properties. If mixing time is too short, it led to a larger particle size.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the second aqueous solution comprises one or more pH modifying agents. The pH modifying agents that may be used in the present MVL formulations are selected from organic acids, organic bases, inorganic acids, or inorganic bases, or combinations thereof. Suitable organic bases that can be used in the present application include, but are not limited to histidine, arginine, lysine, tromethamine (Tris), etc. Suitable inorganic bases that can be used in the present application include, but are not limited to sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, etc. Suitable inorganic acids (also known as mineral acids) that can be used in the present application include, but are not limited to hydrochloric acid (HCl), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), nitric acid (HNO3), etc. Suitable organic acids that can be used in the present application include, but are not limited to acetic acid, aspartic acid, citric acid, formic acid, glutamic acid, glucuronic acid, lactic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, etc. In one embodiment, the pH modifying agent comprises lysine.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the second aqueous solution comprises one or more tonicity agents. Tonicity agents sometimes are also called osmotic agents. Non-limiting exemplary osmotic agents suitable for the MVL formulation of the present application include monosaccharides (e.g., glucose, and the like), disaccharides (e.g., sucrose and the like), polysaccharide or polyols (e.g., sorbitol, mannitol, Dextran, and the like), or amino acids. In some embodiments, one or more tonicity agents may be selected from an amino acid, a sugar, or combinations thereof. In some further embodiments, one or more tonicity agents are selected from dextrose, sorbitol, sucrose, lysine, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the tonicity agent comprises dextrose. In some further embodiments, the second aqueous solution comprises lysine and dextrose.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the volatile water-immiscible organic solvent comprises or is methylene chloride (CH2Cl2). The organic solvent is substantially removed by exposing the second emulsion to a gas atmosphere. Organic solvent may be removed by blowing a gas over the second emulsion, or sparging gas in the second emulsion, or spraying the second emulsion into a chamber with a continuous stream of circulating gas.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, wherein step (e) is performed using two sets of filtration modules, wherein each set of the filtration modules operate independently of the other. In further embodiments, each set of the filtration module comprises five or more hollow fiber filters, each having a membrane pore size from about 0.1 μm to about 0.2 μm. One embodiment of the filtration modules are illustrated in
In some embodiments of process described herein, the diafiltration step (e) is performed multiple times until the aqueous supernatant of the second aqueous suspension is substantially replaced with the saline solution.
In some embodiments of process described herein, step (f) may be performed multiple times until a target concentration of bupivacaine MVLs is reached. In some further embodiments, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes is transferred to a bulk product vessel.
As shown in
At a step 113, a NaCl solution is formed by dissolving sodium chloride in WFI. At a step 114, the NaCl solution (i.e., saline solution) is filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane filter. Under aseptic conditions, the bupivacaine MVLs concentrate formed at step 112 is subjected to crossflow filtration by at least four volumes of the filtered NaCl solution through introduction of the filtered NaCl solution into a crossflow filtration apparatus or system through multiple 0.2 μm hollow fiber filter membrane unit filters at a diafiltration step 115. Diafiltration step 115 is used to remove unencapsulated bupivacaine, lysine, dextrose and residual methylene chloride, thereby reducing the suspension volume and increasing the concentration of the bupivacaine MVLs in the suspension. At a step 116, sterile nitrogen is used to flush the headspace of the crossflow filtration apparatus or system to further reduce residual methylene chloride content. The solution is further concentrated via aseptic microfiltration in concentrate step 117 to form an initial bulk suspension of MVLs at a target weight/volume that corresponds to a bupivacaine concentration of 11.3-16.6 mg/mL. The bulk product is then transferred into a sterilized holding vessel. The initial bulk suspension of MVLs is sampled and bupivacaine concentration is measured. Optionally, if the initial bulk suspension of MVLs is designated to be filled as an individual lot, the initial bulk suspension of MVLs is concentrated further via sedimentation (gravitational settling) and/or decantation to a bupivacaine concentration of approximately 13.3 mg/mL, or alternatively diluted with a filtered NaCl solution to a bupivacaine concentration of approximately 13.3 mg/mL at a decantation and/or dilution step 120 to form an adjusted bulk suspension of MVLs. The saline solution that is optionally used at step 120 can be formed by dissolving sodium chloride in WFI at a step 118 and filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane filter at a step 119.
Tangential Flow Filtration Modules
Some embodiments of the present application relates to a crossflow filtration system comprising: a diafiltration vessel; and a plurality of independently operating crossflow modules, each crossflow module of the plurality of independently operating crossflow modules comprising at least one filter array, each filter array comprising a plurality of hollow fiber filters, wherein each crossflow module of the plurality of independently operating crossflow modules is connected to a retentate conduit, a permeate conduit, and a rotary lobe pump. In some embodiments, the crossflow filtration system may be used in the microfiltration and/or diafiltration step of the commercial process described herein.
In some embodiments, each crossflow module comprises two filter arrays. In some embodiments, each crossflow module comprises at least five hollow fiber filters. In some such embodiments, each filter array comprises at least two hollow fiber filters.
In some embodiments, the plurality of independently operating crossflow modules comprises a first crossflow module and a second crossflow module, wherein the first crossflow module is coupled to a first rotary lobe pump and the second crossflow module is coupled to a second rotary lobe pump operating independently of the first rotary lobe pump. In some further embodiments, the first crossflow module is coupled to the diafiltration vessel by a first retentate conduit to facilitate flow of retentate from the first crossflow module to the diafiltration vessel, and wherein the second crossflow module is coupled to the diafiltration vessel by a second retentate conduit to facilitate flow of retentate from the second crossflow module to the diafiltration vessel. In some further embodiments, the first rotary lobe pump comprises a fluid outlet coupling the first rotary lobe pump to the first crossflow module, and wherein the second rotary lobe pump comprises a fluid outlet coupling the second rotary lobe pump to the first crossflow module. In some further embodiments, the first rotary lobe pump comprises a fluid inlet coupling the first rotary lobe pump to the diafiltration vessel, and wherein the second rotary lobe pump comprises a fluid inlet coupling the second rotary lobe pump to the diafiltration vessel.
In some embodiments, the first crossflow module operates independently from the second crossflow module. In some such embodiments, only one of the first crossflow module and the second crossflow module is in use during the operation of the crossflow filtration system. In other embodiments, both the first crossflow module and the second crossflow module are in use during the operation of the crossflow filtration system.
In some embodiments, each of the plurality of independently operating crossflow modules comprises a microfiltration mode and a diafiltration mode.
In some embodiments, the crossflow filtration system further comprises a nitrogen sparging module to blow a stream nitrogen over the retentate in the diafiltration vessel.
Some further embodiments of the present application relate to a process of manufacturing bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes using the cross-flow module described herein, the process comprising:
In some embodiments, the process further comprises blowing a stream of nitrogen over the second aqueous suspension during the diafiltration/saline exchange step. In some further embodiments, the diafiltration include at least two, three, four or five exchange volumes of the saline solution such that the aqueous supernatant of the second aqueous suspension is substantially (e.g., at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%) replaced by the saline solution.
Some further embodiments relate to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes prepared by the process utilizing the crossflow filtration system described herein.
The system may be connected to a sparge/diafiltration vessel 206. Retentate can flow from the crossflow module 202a to the vessel 206 via a retentate return conduit 208a. Retentate can flow from the crossflow module 202b to the vessel 206 via a retentate return conduit 208b. Permeate can flow from the crossflow module 202a for removal from the system 200 via a permeate conduit 210a. Permeate can flow from the crossflow module 202b for removal from the system 200 via a permeate conduit 210b.
The system 200 may include or be used in conjunction with two independently operating rotary lobe pumps 212a and 212b. The pump 212a includes a fluid inlet 214a and a fluid outlet 216a. The pump 212b includes a fluid inlet 214b and a fluid outlet 216b. The pump 212a is connected to the vessel 206 via the inlet 214a and connected to crossflow module 202a via the outlet 216a. The pump 212b is connected to the vessel 206 via the inlet 214b and connected to the crossflow module 202b via the outlet 216b.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the crossflow filtration system utilizes two independent rotary lobe pumps providing retentate flow to independent arrays of five hollow fiber filter housings. This configuration allows for smaller pipe diameters to allow for turbulent flow. In addition, the filtration module design allows for two filter arrays to be in-use during bulk operation while two filter arrays are being cleaned and sterilized in preparation for the next bulk production run. This configuration allows for shorter cycle times and increased manufacturing capacity. Furthermore, the improved filtration module design allows for independent hollow fiber filter housing isolation. This functionality automatically detects and isolates individual filter integrity failures, allowing the bulk cycle to proceed without offline testing and recleaning. In some further embodiments, the process may further comprise an additional product recovery step from one of the two filter array and/or an saline flush step, to allow for nearly complete product recover from the transfer lines and thereby increasing product yield.
In some embodiments of the process described herein, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes has a volume of about 150 L to about 250 L. In one embodiment, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes has a volume of about 200 L. In another embodiment, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes has a volume of about 225 L. In some embodiments, the percent packed particle volume (% PPV) of the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes is about 32% to about 44%, about 35% to about 40%, or about 36% to about 38%. In some such embodiments, the target concentration of the bupivacaine in the final aqueous suspension (i.e., bulk product suspension) is from about 12.6 mg/mL to about 17 mg/mL. In further embodiments, the final product target concentration of the bupivacaine in the aqueous suspension is about 13.3 mg/mL. In some embodiments, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine MVLs comprises less than 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or 1% unencapsulated bupivacaine, wherein the amount of unencapsulated bupivacaine is calculate based on the total weight of the bupivacaine in the aqueous suspension. In some embodiments, the d50 of the multivesicular liposomes in the final aqueous suspension is about 24 μm to about 31 μm. In one embodiments, the d50 of the multivesicular liposomes in the final aqueous suspension is about 27 μm. In some embodiments, the internal pH of the bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes is about 5.5. In some such embodiments, the lysine concentration inside the bupivacaine multivesicular liposome particles (i.e., internal lysine concentration or encapsulated lysine concentration) is about 0.08 mg/mL. In further embodiments, the internal lysine concentration is about 0.03 mg/mL, where the lysine concentration is measured when the MVL particles are in the aqueous suspension. In some embodiments, the external pH of the bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes is about 7.0 to about 7.4. As used herein, “internal pH” of the bupivacaine MVLs refer to the pH of the internal aqueous chambers of the MVL particles. The pH of the aqueous suspension of the bupivacaine MVLs is also referred to as the “external pH” of the bupivacaine MVLs. In some embodiments, the external pH of the bupivacaine MVLs are measured during the product's shelf life under the storage condition between 2-8° C. When the bupivacaine MVLs are stored at ambient temperature at extended period of time, the external pH of the composition may drop below the 7.0-7.4 range partially due to the accelerated lipid hydrolysis.
Bupivacaine Multivesicular Liposomes Prepared by the New Process
MVLs are a group of unique forms of synthetic membrane vesicles that are different from other lipid-based delivery systems such as unilamellar liposomes and multilamellar liposomes (Bangham, et al., J Mol. Bio., 13:238-252, 1965). The main structural difference between multivesicular liposomes and unilamellar liposomes (also known as unilamellar vesicles, “ULVs”), is that multivesicular liposomes contain multiple aqueous chambers per particle. The main structural difference between multivesicular liposomes and multilamellar liposomes (also known as multilamellar vesicles, “MLVs”), is that in multivesicular liposomes the multiple aqueous chambers are non-concentric. Multivesicular liposomes generally have between 100 to 1 million chambers per particle and all the internal chambers are interconnected by shared lipid-bilayer walls that separate the chambers. The presence of internal membranes distributed as a network throughout multivesicular liposomes may serve to confer increased mechanical strength to the vesicle. The particles themselves can occupy a very large proportion of the total formulation volume. Such formulation is intended to prolong the local delivery of bupivacaine, thereby enhancing the duration of action of the reduction of pain.
The bupivacaine MVLs produced by the process described herein have improved stability over the commercial Exparel® product. It was observed that the bupivacaine MVL particles produced by the process described herein have lower lipid hydrolysis byproducts compared to the commercial Exparel® product under the same incubation condition. In addition, the bupivacaine MVL particles produced by the process described herein has higher internal lysine and dextrose concentrations and more desirable internal pH, which may improve MVL particle strength during product transportation, as well as lipid membrane stability.
Some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs) prepared by a commercial scale process described herein, the commercial scale process comprising:
(a) mixing a first aqueous solution comprising phosphoric acid with a volatile water-immiscible solvent solution to form a water-in-oil first emulsion, wherein the volatile water-immiscible solvent solution comprises bupivacaine, 1, 2-dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC), 1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), and at least one neutral lipid;
(b) mixing the water-in-oil first emulsion with a second aqueous solution to form a water-in-oil-in-water second emulsion;
(c) removing the volatile water-immiscible solvent from the water-in-oil-in-water second emulsion to form a first aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a first volume;
(d) reducing the first volume of the first aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs by microfiltration to provide a second aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a second volume;
(e) exchanging the aqueous supernatant of the second aqueous suspension with a saline solution by diafiltration to provide a third aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a third volume; and
(f) further reducing the third volume of the third aqueous suspension by microfiltration to provide a final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a target concentration of bupivacaine;
wherein all steps are carried out under aseptic conditions; and
wherein the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 23 μg/mL or less after the composition is stored at 25° C. for one month. In one embodiment, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 22.7 μg/mL after the composition is stored at 25° C. for one month.
In some embodiments, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs described in the process is the composition of the bupivacaine MVLs described herein. In other embodiments, the concentration of the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs described in the process may be further adjusted with a saline solution to provide the composition of the bupivacaine MVLs described herein. In some embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 7.1 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for one month.
In some further embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 38 μg/mL or less after the composition is stored at 25° C. for two months. In one embodiment, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 37.3 μg/mL after the composition is stored at 25° C. for two months. In some such embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 7.1 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for two months.
In some further embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 54 μg/mL or less after the composition is stored at 25° C. for three months. In one embodiment, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 53 μg/mL after the composition is stored at 25° C. for three month. In some such embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 6.9 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for three months.
In some further embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 100 μg/mL or less after the composition is stored at 25° C. for six months. In one embodiment, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 98.7 μg/mL after the composition is stored at 25° C. for six months. In some further embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 6.5 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for six months.
In some embodiments, the composition of bupivacaine MVLs comprises the following lipid components: DEPC, DPPG, cholesterol and tricaprylin. In some embodiments, the total concentrations of the lipid components in the composition are the following: DEPC (about 7.0 mg/mL), DPPG (about 0.9 mg/mL), cholesterol (about 4.2 mg/mL), tricaprylin (about 1.6 mg/mL). Since DEPC has the highest concentration of all the lipid components, the hydrolysis byproducts of DEPC is used as the marker to assess lipid stability of the MVLs. The hydrolysis byproducts of DEPC include erucic acid and lyso-DEPC (1- and 2-isomers). Lyso-DEPC is formed by hydrolysis of DEPC. Lyso-DEPC can further hydrolyze to glycerophosphocholine and erucic acid. In some embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition of bupivacaine MVLs produced by the process described herein is at least about 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14% or 15% less than the erucic acid concentration in the Exparel® product manufactured by the current commercial process, under the same incubation condition. In some such embodiments, the incubation condition is at 25° for 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, or 6 months.
Some additional embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs) prepared by a commercial scale process described herein, the commercial scale process comprising:
(a) mixing a first aqueous solution comprising phosphoric acid with a volatile water-immiscible solvent solution to form a water-in-oil first emulsion, wherein the volatile water-immiscible solvent solution comprises bupivacaine, 1, 2-dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC), 1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), and at least one neutral lipid;
(b) mixing the water-in-oil first emulsion with a second aqueous solution to form a water-in-oil-in-water second emulsion, wherein the second aqueous solution comprises lysine and dextrose;
(c) removing the volatile water-immiscible solvent from the water-in-oil-in-water second emulsion to form a first aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a first volume;
(d) reducing the first volume of the first aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs by microfiltration to provide a second aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a second volume;
(e) exchanging the aqueous supernatant of the second aqueous suspension with a saline solution by diafiltration to provide a third aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a third volume; and
(f) further reducing the third volume of the third aqueous suspension by microfiltration to provide a final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs having a target concentration of bupivacaine;
wherein all steps are carried out under aseptic conditions; and
wherein the internal pH of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs in the composition is about 5.50. In some embodiments, the internal pH is measured after the composition has been stored at about 2-8° C. for at least 3 months, 6 months or 9 months. In one embodiment, the internal pH is measured after the composition has been stored at about 2-8° C. for about 9 months.
In some embodiments, the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs described in the process is the composition of the bupivacaine MVLs described herein. In other embodiments, the concentration of the final aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs described in the process may be further adjusted with a saline solution to provide the composition of the bupivacaine MVLs described herein.
In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the lysine concentration inside the bupivacaine encapsulated MVL particles of the composition (internal lysine concentration or encapsulated lysine concentration) is about 0.030 μg/mL to about 0.032 μg/mL. In some such embodiment, the internal lysine concentration is measured when the bupivacaine MVLs are suspended in an aqueous suspension with % PPV about 36.5%. In some further embodiments, the internal lysine concentration inside the bupivacaine encapsulated MVL particles is about 0.031 μg/mL.
In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the dextrose concentration inside the bupivacaine encapsulated MVL particles of the composition (internal dextrose concentration or encapsulated dextrose concentration) is about 1.25 μg/mL to about 1.32 μg/mL. In some such embodiment, the internal dextrose concentration is measured when the bupivacaine MVLs are suspended in an aqueous suspension with % PPV about 36.5%. In some further embodiments, the internal dextrose concentration inside the bupivacaine encapsulated MVL particles is about 1.29 μg/mL.
Although it is expected that only phosphoric acid reside inside the internal aqueous chambers of the MVL particles (i.e., the first emulsion is formed by mixing the phosphoric acid aqueous solution with a volatile water-immiscible solvent solution). However, there are also very small amounts of lysine and dextrose encapsulated inside the internal aqueous chambers during the formation of the second emulsion, which ultimately forms the MVL particles. In some embodiments, the lysine concentration in the bupivacaine MVLs produced by the process described herein is at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, or 30% more than the encapsulated lysine concentration in the Exparel® product manufactured by the current commercial process. Since lysine is also a pH modifying agent, the small change in lysine concentration also results in the increase of the internal pH of the bupivacaine MVL particles of about 5.50, as compared to the internal pH of about 5.34 in a batch of Exparel® product manufactured by the current commercial process. In some such embodiments, the increase of the internal pH is characterized by the decrease in [H+] concentration (i.e., pH=−log [H+]). In some embodiments, the decrease in [H+] concentration in the internal aqueous chambers of the bupivacaine MVLs is at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% or 30%. As reported by Grit M. et al., phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine have the lowest rate of hydrolysis regardless of the temperature of their storage at pH 6.5. See J. Pharm. Sci. 1993; 82(4):362-366. As such, the closer the internal pH is to 6.5, the lower the lipid hydrolysis. In some further embodiments, the dextrose concentration in the bupivacaine MVLs produced by the process described herein is at least about 2%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5% or 20% more than the encapsulated dextrose concentration in the Exparel® product manufactured by the current commercial process.
In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the mixing in step (a) is performed using a first mixer at a high shear speed. In some embodiments, the high sheer speed is from about 1100 rpm to about 1200 rpm, for example, 1100 rpm, 1120 rpm, 1130 rpm, 1140 rpm, 1150 rpm, 1160 rpm, 1170 rpm, 1180 rpm, 1190 rpm, or 1200 rpm, or a range defined by any two of the preceding values. In some embodiment, the high sheer speed is about 1150 rpm. In some embodiments, the mixing in step (a) is performed for about 65 minutes, 66 minutes, 67 minutes, 68 minutes, 69 minutes, 70 minutes, 71 minutes, 72 minutes, 73 minutes, 74 minutes or 75 minutes. In some further embodiments, the first mixer used in step (a) of the process is a mixer having a blade diameter of between about 8 inch to about 10 inch. In further embodiments, the first mixer used in step (a) of the process is not a static mixer. In further embodiments, the mixing in step (a) is performed at a temperature of about 21° C. to about 23° C.
In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the mixing in step (b) is performed using a second mixer at a low shear speed. In some embodiments, the low sheer speed is from about 450 rpm to about 510 rpm, for example, 450 rpm, 455 rpm, 460 rpm, 465 rpm, 470 rpm, 475 rpm, 480 rpm, 485 rpm, 490 rpm, 495 rpm, 500 rpm, 505 rpm, or 510 rpm, or a range defined by any of the two preceding values. In some embodiment, the low sheer speed is about 495 rpm. In some embodiments, the mixing in step (b) is performed for about 60 seconds, 61 seconds, 62 seconds, 63 seconds, 64 seconds, or 65 seconds. In some further embodiments, the second mixer used in step (b) of the process has a blade diameter of between about 10 inch to about 15 inch, for example, 10 inch, 11 inch, 12 inch, 13 inch, or 14 inch. In further embodiments, the second mixer used in step (b) of the process is not a static mixer. In further embodiments, the mixing in step (b) is performed at a temperature of about 21° C. to about 23° C.
In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes may have a final volume of about 150 L to about 250 L, or about 200 L to about 250 L, before being filled into individual containers for human administration. In other embodiments, the composition of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs may have a volume of 10 mL or 20 mL for a single dose administration. In some embodiments, the percent packed particle volume (% PPV) of the composition of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs is about 32%, 33%, 34%, 35%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%, 42%, 43% or 44%. In some such embodiments, the concentration of the bupivacaine in the composition is from about 12.6 mg/mL to about 17 mg/mL. In one embodiment, the concentration of the bupivacaine in the composition is about 13.3 mg/mL. In further embodiments, the composition comprises less than 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or 1% unencapsulated bupivacaine, wherein the amount of unencapsulated bupivacaine is calculated based on the total weight of the bupivacaine in the composition. In some embodiments, the d50 of the multivesicular liposomes in the composition is about 24 μm to about 31 μm. In one embodiments, the d50 of the multivesicular liposomes in the composition is about 27 μm.
Bupivacaine Multivesicular Liposomes
Some aspect of the present disclosure relates to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs), comprising: bupivacaine residing inside a plurality of internal aqueous chambers of the MVLs separated by lipid membranes, wherein the lipid membranes comprise 1, 2-dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), and at least one neutral lipid; and an aqueous medium in which the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs are suspended; wherein erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 23 μg/mL or less (e.g., about 22.7 μg/mL) after the composition is stored at 25° C. for one month. In some embodiments, the composition has an initial pH of about 7.4. In some further embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 38 μg/mL or less (e.g., about 37.3 μg/mL) after the composition is stored at 25° C. for two months. In some such embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 7.1 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for two months. In some further embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 54 μg/mL or less (e.g., about 53.0 μg/mL) after the composition is stored at 25° C. for three month. In some such embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 6.9 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for three months. In some further embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition is about 100 μg/mL or less (e.g., about 98.7 μg/mL) after the composition is stored at 25° C. for six months. In some further embodiments, the composition has a pH of about 6.5 after the composition is stored at 25° C. for six months. In some further embodiments, the lipid membranes further comprise cholesterol and tricaprylin.
In some embodiments, the erucic acid concentration in the composition of bupivacaine MVLs is at least about 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14% or 15% less than the erucic acid concentration in the Exparel® product currently on the market, under the same incubation conditions. In some such embodiments, the incubation condition is at 25° for 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, or 6 months.
Some additional aspect of the present disclosure relates to a composition of bupivacaine encapsulated multivesicular liposomes (MVLs), comprising: bupivacaine residing inside a plurality of internal aqueous chambers of the MVLs separated by lipid membranes, wherein the lipid membranes comprise 1, 2-dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC), 1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3 phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) (DPPG), and at least one neutral lipid; and an aqueous medium in which the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs are suspended; wherein the internal pH of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs is about 5.50. In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the internal lysine concentration of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs composition is about 0.030 μg/mL to about 0.032 μg/mL. In some further embodiments, the internal lysine concentration of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs composition is about 0.031 μg/mL. In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the internal dextrose concentration of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs composition is about 1.25 μg/mL to about 1.32 μg/mL. In some further embodiments, the internal dextrose concentration of the bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs composition is about 1.29 μg/mL. In some further embodiments, the lipid membranes further comprise cholesterol and tricaprylin. In some further embodiments, the internal lysine or dextrose concentration are measured when the bupivacaine MVLs are in an aqueous suspension having % PPV from about 36% to about 38% (e.g., about 36.5%).
In some embodiments of the composition described herein, the internal lysine concentration in the bupivacaine MVLs is at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, or 30% more than the encapsulated lysine concentration in the Exparel® product currently on the market. In some such embodiments, the small change in lysine concentration also results in the increase of the internal pH of the bupivacaine MVL particles of about 5.50, as compared to the internal pH of about 5.34 in the Exparel® product currently on the market. In some such embodiments, the increase of the internal pH is characterized by the decrease in [H+] concentration (i.e., pH=−log [H+]). In some embodiments, the decrease in [H+] concentration in the internal aqueous chambers of the bupivacaine MVLs is at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% or 30%. In some further embodiments, the internal dextrose concentration in the bupivacaine MVLs is at least about 2%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5% or 20% more than the encapsulated dextrose concentration in the Exparel® currently on the market.
In some further embodiments, the composition of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs may have a volume of 10 mL or 20 mL for a single dose administration. In some embodiments, the percent packed particle volume (% PPV) of the composition of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs is about 32%, 33%, 34%, 35%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%, 42%, 43% or 44%. In some such embodiments, the concentration of the bupivacaine in the composition is from about 12.6 mg/mL to about 17 mg/mL. In one embodiment, the concentration of the bupivacaine in the composition is about 13.3 mg/mL. In further embodiments, the composition comprises less than 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or 1% unencapsulated bupivacaine, wherein the amount of unencapsulated bupivacaine is calculate based on the total weight of the bupivacaine in the composition. In some embodiments, the d50 of the multivesicular liposomes in the composition is about 24 μm to about 31 μm. In one embodiments, the d50 of the multivesicular liposomes in the composition is about 27 μm.
Methods of Administration
Some embodiments of the present application are related to methods for treating, ameliorating pain comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising bupivacaine MVLs, as described herein, to a subject in need thereof. In some further embodiments, the pain is post surgical pain.
In some embodiments of the methods described herein, the administration is parenteral. In some further embodiments, the parenteral administration may be selected from the group consisting of subcutaneous injection, tissue injection, intramuscular injection, intraarticular, spinal injection, intraocular injection, epidural injection, intrathecal injection, intraotic injection, perineural injection, and combinations thereof. In particular embodiments, the parenteral administration is subcutaneous injection or tissue injection. In some further embodiments, the instant pharmaceutical compositions can be administered by bolus injection, e.g., subcutaneous bolus injection, intramuscular bolus injection, intradermal bolus injection and the like. In one embodiment, the administration is via local infiltration to a surgical site to provide local analgesia. In another embodiment, the administration is via interscalene brachial plexus nerve block or femoral nerve block to provide regional analgesia.
Administration of the instant bupivacaine MVL composition may be accomplished using standard methods and devices, e.g., pens, injector systems, needle and syringe, a subcutaneous injection port delivery system, catheters, and the like. The administration of the bupivacaine MVLs composition may be used in conjunction with Pacira's handheld cryoanalgesia device.
Pharmaceutical Compositions
In some embodiments, the composition comprising bupivacaine MVLs is a pharmaceutical formulation includes a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Effective injectable bupivacaine MVLs compositions is in a liquid suspension form. Such injectable suspension compositions require a liquid suspending medium, with or without adjuvants, as a vehicle. The suspending medium can be, for example, aqueous solutions of sodium chloride (i.e., saline solution), dextrose, sucrose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, a pH modifying agent described herein, or combinations of the above. In some embodiments, the suspending medium of bupivacaine MVLs is a saline solution, optionally contain a tonicity agent such as dextrose and/or a pH modifying agent such as lysine.
Suitable physiologically acceptable storage solution components are used to keep the compound suspended in suspension compositions. The storage solution components can be chosen from thickeners such as carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gelatin and the alginates. Many surfactants are also useful as suspending agents. The suspending medium could also contain lecithin, alkylphenol polyethylene oxide adducts, naphthalenesulfonates, alkylbenzenesulfonates, or the polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters. In some embodiments, the bupivacaine MVL composition is free or substantially free of any additive of preservatives.
In any embodiments of the composition of bupivacaine encapsulated MVLs described herein, the composition may be a pharmaceutical composition suitable for human administration. In further embodiments, the composition may be an aqueous suspension of bupivacaine encapsulated MVL particles.
The following examples, including experiments and results achieved, are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the present application.
In this example, the lipid stability of three batches (Batch No. 1, 2 and 3 in Tables 1A and 1B) of bupivacaine MVLs aqueous suspension prepared by the new process described herein and were compared to ten reference samples of bupivacaine MVLs aqueous suspension prepared by the current commercial process. DEPC hydrolysis byproduct erucic acid was used as the marker to measure the stability of the lipid membranes of the MVL particles. All the samples were incubated at 25° C. for 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months. The pH of the supernatant of each sample (i.e., the external pH of the bupivacaine MVL composition) was also tested at each time point and summarized in Table 1B. Erucic acid was detected using HPLC and the erucic acid concentration in the sample was calculated based on the HPLC peak area and the standard curve.
In this experiment, the lysine and dextrose concentration were measured in three batches (Batch No. 1, 2 and 3 in Tables 2A and 2B) of bupivacaine MVLs aqueous suspension prepared by the new process described herein and compared to several reference samples of bupivacaine MVLs aqueous suspension prepared by the current commercial process.
It was observed that the total suspensions and bupivacaine MVL particles prepared by the present process contained approximately 17% and 13% more dextrose, respectively, than those samples prepared by the existing commercial process. In addition, the lysine concentration was 8% and 29% more in those samples prepared by the present process. In addition, the internal and external pH of the bupivacaine MVL compositions were also measured. The higher internal pH of the bupivacaine MVL particles prepared by the present process may be attributable to the higher lysine concentration inside the MVL particles. As discussed above, the slight increase in MVL internal pH may also contribute to the stability of the lipid membranes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3684251 | Bowling | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3946994 | Mertz et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4026817 | Ciuti et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4078052 | Papahadjopoulos | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4089801 | Schneider | May 1978 | A |
| 4113765 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4145410 | Sears | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4224179 | Schneider | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4235587 | Miles | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4235871 | Papahadjopoulos et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4310506 | Baldeschwieler et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4394372 | Taylor | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4420398 | Castino | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4454083 | Brown et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4478824 | Franco et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4522803 | Lenk et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4588578 | Fountain et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4590030 | Gillner et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4599227 | Dees et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4599342 | LaHann | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4610868 | Fountain et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4622219 | Haynes | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4644056 | Kothe et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4652441 | Okada et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4668580 | Dahm et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4711782 | Okada et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4725442 | Haynes | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4744989 | Payne et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4752425 | Martin et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4761255 | Dahm et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4761288 | Mezei | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4769250 | Forssen | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776991 | Farmer et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4781831 | Goldsmith | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4781871 | West, III et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4788001 | Narula | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4844620 | Lissant et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4844904 | Hamaguchi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4861597 | Kida et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4877561 | Iga et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877619 | Richer | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4908463 | Bottelberghe | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4920016 | Allen et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4921644 | Lau et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4921853 | LeBlanc | May 1990 | A |
| 4937078 | Mezei et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4946683 | Forssen | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4956290 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5000959 | Iga et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5004611 | Leigh | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013556 | Woodle et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5019394 | Hamaguchi et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5021200 | Vanlerberghe et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5049392 | Weiner et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5069936 | Yen | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5077056 | Bally et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5091187 | Haynes | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5094854 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100591 | Leclef et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5141674 | Leigh | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147134 | Bradley et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5169637 | Lenk et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5186941 | Callahan et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5192549 | Barenolz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5204112 | Hope et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5211955 | Legros et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5225212 | Martin et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5227165 | Domb et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5227170 | Sullivan | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5244678 | Legros et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5246707 | Haynes | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5261903 | Dhaliwal et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5292701 | Glemza et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5321012 | Mayer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334381 | Unger | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5334391 | Clark et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5364632 | Benita et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5387387 | James et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5393530 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5407660 | Bosworth et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5415867 | Minchey et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5422120 | Kim | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5451408 | Mezei et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455044 | Kim et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| RE35192 | Reese | Mar 1996 | E |
| 5533526 | Goldberg | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543158 | Gref et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5576017 | Kim | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576018 | Kim et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5589189 | Moynihan | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5635205 | Nyqvist et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5658898 | Weder et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662931 | Munechika et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5681464 | Larsson | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5700482 | Frederiksen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5708011 | Bardsley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5723147 | Kim et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5766627 | Sankaram et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770222 | Unger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776486 | Castor et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5776915 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5807573 | Ljusberg-Wahren et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814335 | Webb et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5827533 | Needham | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837282 | Fenske et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5849763 | Bardsley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853755 | Foldvari | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5865184 | Takiguchi | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879672 | Davis et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5882679 | Needham | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5885260 | Mehl, Sr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891467 | Willis | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5891842 | Kream | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895661 | Tournier et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5910502 | Gennery | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912271 | Brodin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5919804 | Gennery | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922340 | Berde et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942253 | Gombotz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945126 | Thanoo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945435 | Evetts | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947689 | Schick | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948441 | Lenk et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955087 | Whittle et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955479 | Bardsley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5962016 | Willis | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5962532 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5977326 | Scheinmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980927 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980937 | Tournier et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997899 | Ye et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007838 | Alving et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6033708 | Kwasiborski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045824 | Kim et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6046187 | Berde et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048545 | Keller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6066331 | Barenholz et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069155 | Mather et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071534 | Kim et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6103741 | Bardsley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106858 | Ye et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6120797 | Meers et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132766 | Sankaram et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6149937 | Camu et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6171613 | Ye et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6193998 | Ye et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6217899 | Benameur et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221385 | Camu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221401 | Zasadzinski et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6238702 | Berde et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241999 | Ye et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264988 | Yen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270802 | Thanoo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287587 | Shigeyuki et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
| 6306432 | Shirley et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6355267 | Collins | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6399094 | Brandi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417201 | Bardsley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 8182835 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8834921 | Kim et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9192575 | Kim et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9205052 | Kim et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9585838 | Hartounian et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 10398648 | Schutt | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10842745 | Barenholz et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 20020041895 | Gregoriadis et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020339596 | Hartounian et al. | Apr 2002 | |
| 20030201230 | Kopf | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040247659 | Eibl | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20130183375 | Schutt | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130251786 | Li | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140004173 | Hartounian et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140319045 | Shevitz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150158907 | Zhou | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20190169559 | Coffman | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2078666 | Sep 1991 | CA |
| 1323568 | Oct 1993 | CA |
| 1337273 | Oct 1995 | CA |
| 2199004 | Mar 1996 | CA |
| 2176712 | May 2000 | CA |
| 0 126 580 | Nov 1984 | EP |
| 0 208 450 | Jan 1987 | EP |
| 0 506 639 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0 280 503 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0 752 245 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 2050287 | Jan 1981 | GB |
| WO 8503011 | Jul 1985 | WO |
| WO 8900846 | Feb 1989 | WO |
| WO 8904656 | Jun 1989 | WO |
| WO 9114445 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| WO 9300888 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO 9408565 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO 9408626 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO 9422430 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO 9423697 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO 9426250 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO 9426253 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO 9427581 | Dec 1994 | WO |
| WO 9501164 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO 9513796 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO 9608235 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO 9614057 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO 9702022 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 9703652 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO 9735561 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 98014171 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 98033483 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO 2021011299 | Jan 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Grit et al., Apr. 1993, Hydrolysis of saturated soybean phosphatidylcholine in aqueous liposome dispersions, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 82(4):362-366. |
| “Guidance for Industry: Guideline on Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing,” Jun. 1987, Reprinted Jun. 1991, pp. 1-43, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research et al. |
| “Local Anesthetics,” NEW Pharmacology, Revised 3.sup.rd ed., pp. 261-266, Tanaka et al. eds. Nankoudou Corp., Aug. 1, 1997. |
| Andrews et al., “Boundary Layer Solution for a Bubble Rising Through a Liquid Containing Surface-Active Contaminants,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1995, 34(4):1371-1382. |
| Arroyo et al., “Use of intermittent jets to enhance flux in crossflow filtration,” J. Membrane Sci., 1993, 80:117-129. |
| Assil et al., “Liposome Suppression of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Rabbit Model Using Antimetabolite Encapsulated Liposomes,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 32(11):2891-2897, 1991. |
| Assil et al., “Multivesicular Liposomes: Sustained Release of the Antimetabolite Cytarabine in the Eye,” Arch Ophthalmol., 1987, 105(3):400-403. |
| Assil et al., “Tobramycin Liposomes: Single Subconjunctival Therapy of Pseudomonal Keratitis,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 32(13):3216-3220, 1991. |
| Bangham et al., “Diffusion of Univalent Ions Across the Lamellae of Swollen Phospholipids,” J. Mol. Biol., 1965, 13:238-252. |
| Barbet et al., “Weak acid-induced release of liposome-encapsulated carboxyfluorescein,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1984, 772:347-356. |
| Bhave, “Cross-Flow Filtration,” Fermentation and Biochemical Engineering Handbook: Principles, Process Design and Equipment, 2.sup.nd edition, (Vogel et al. Eds., 1997), Noyes Publications, Westwood, New Jersey, pp. 271-278. |
| Bonetti et al., “An extended-release formulation of methotrexate for subcutaneous administration,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 33:303-306, 1994. |
| Boogaerts et al. “Biodistribution of liposome-associated bupivacaine after extradural administration to rabbits,” Br. J. Anaesth, 1995, 75:319-325. |
| Boogaerts et al. “Epidural Administration of Liposome-Associated Bupivacaine for the Management of Postsurgical Pain: A First Study,” J. Clin. Anesth, 1994, 6:315-320. |
| Boogaerts et al. “Motor Blockade and Absence of Local Nerve Toxicity Induced by Liposomal Bupivacaine Injected into the Axillary Plexus of Rabbits,” Acta Anesth. Belg., 1995, 46:19-24. |
| Boogaerts et al. “Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine after brachial plexus administration of liposome-associated and plain solutions to rabbits,” Can. J. Anaesth, 1993, 40:1201-1204. |
| Boogaerts et al. “Toxicity of Bupivacaine Encapsulated into Liposomes and Injected Intravenously: Comparison with Plan Solutions,” Anesth. Analg., 1993, 76:553-555. |
| Chamberlain et al., “Treatment of Leptomeningeal Metastasis With Intraventricular Administration of Depot Cytarabine (DTC 101): A Phase I Study,” Arch. Neurol., 50:261-264, 1993. |
| Chatelut et al., “A slow-release methotrexate formulation for intrathecal chemotherapy,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 32:179-182, 1993. |
| Chattopadhyay et al., “The Protective Effect of Specific Medium Additives with Respect to Bubble Rupture,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1995, 45(6):473-480. |
| Chemical Comprehensive Dictionary, compact 2.sup.rd ed., Kyoritsushuppan Corp., edited by the Editorial Committee of the Chemical Comprehensive Dictionary, Aug. 25, 1963, pp. 725-726. |
| Cherry et al., “Cell Death in the Thin Films of Bursting Bubbles,” Biotechnol. Prog., 1992, 8(1):11-18. |
| Cullis et al., “Structural Properties and Functional Roles of Phospholipids in Biological Membranes,” Phospholipids and Cellular Regulation, pp. 1-59, vol. 1, J.F. Kuo ed., CRC Press, 1985, Boca Raton, FL. |
| De Gier, J et al., Lipid Composition and Permeability of Liposomes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 150:666-675 (1968). |
| Edwards et al., “Large Porous Particles for Pulmonary Drug Delivery,” Science, 1997, 276: 1868-1871. |
| Frucht-Perry et al., “Fibrin-Enmeshed Tobramycin Liposomes: Single Application Topical Therapy of Pseudomonas Keratitis,” Cornea, 1992, 11(5):393-397. |
| Genovesi, “Several uses for tangential-flow filtration in the pharmaceutical industry,” J. Parenter. Sci. Technol. (1983), 37(3):81-86. |
| Gruner et al., “Novel Multilayered Lipid Vesicles: Comparison of Physical Characteristics of Multilamellar Liposomes and Stable Plurilamellar Vesicles,” Biochemistry, 1985, 24(12):2833-2842. |
| Holdich et al., “The variation of crossflow filtration rate with wall shear stress and the effect of deposit thickness,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design (Trans IChem), 1995, 73(part A):20-26. |
| Huang, “Studies on Phosphatidylcholine Vesicles. Formation and Physical Characteristics,” Biochemistry, 1969, 8(1):344-352. |
| Ishii, “Production and size control of large unilamellar liposomes by emulsification,” Liposome Technology 2.sup.nd Edition, pp. 111-121, vol. 1, Gregory Gregoriadis ed., CRC Press, 1993, Boca Raton, FL. |
| Jaffrin et al., “Energy saving pulsatile mode cross flow filtration,” J. Membrane Sci., 1994, 86:281-290. |
| Johnson et al., “New nozzle improves FCC feed atomization, unit yield patterns,” Oil and Gas Journal, 1994, 92(3):80-86. |
| Kawashima et al., “Shear-Induced Phase Inversion and Size Control of Water/Oil/Water Emulsion Droplets with Porous Membrane,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1991, 145(2):512-523. |
| Kim “Liposomes as Carriers of Cancer Chemotherapy: Current status and Future Prospects,” Drugs, 46(4):618-638,1993. |
| Kim et al., “Direct Cerebrospinal Fluid Delivery of an Antiretroviral Agent Using Multivesicular Liposomes,” J. Infect. Dis., 1990, 162(3):750-752. |
| Kim et al., “Extended CSF Cytarabine Exposure Following Intrathecal Administration of DTC 101,” J. Olin. Oncol., 1993, 11(11):2186-2193. |
| Kim et al., “Extended-release formulation of morphine for subcutaneous administration,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 1993, 33(3):187-190. |
| Kim et al., “Modulation of the peritoneal clearance of liposomal cytosine arabinoside by blank liposomes,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 1987, 19(4):307-310. |
| Kim et al., “Multivesicular Liposomes Containing 1-beta-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine for Slow-Release Intrathecal Therapy,” Cancer Res., 47(15):3935-3937, 1987. |
| Kim et al., “Multivesicular Liposomes Containing Cytarabine Entrapped in the Presence of Hydrochloric Acid for Intracavitary Chemotherapy,” Cancer Treat. Rep., 71(7-8):705-711, 1987. |
| Kim et al., “Multivesicular Liposomes Containing Cytarabine for Slow-Release Sc Administration,” Cancer Treat. Rep., 71(5):447-450, 1987. |
| Kim et al., “Preparation of cell-size unilamellar liposomes with high captured volume and defined size distribution,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1981, 646:1-9. |
| Kim et al., “Preparation of multilamellar vesicles of defined size-distribution by solvent-spherule evaporation,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1985, 812:793-801. |
| Kim et al., “Preparation of Multivesicular Liposomes,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 728(3):339-348, 1983. |
| Kim et al., “Prolongation of Drug Exposure in Cerebrospinal Fluid by Encapsulation into DepoFoam,” Cancer Res., 53(7):1596-1598, 1993. |
| Kim, T. et al., “Extended-release formulations of morphine for subcutaneous administration,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., vol. 33, pp. 187-190 (1993). |
| Lafont et al. “Use of Liposome-Associated Bupivacaine for the Management of a Chronic Pain Syndrome,” Anesth. Analg., 1994, 79:818. |
| Lafont et al. “Use of Liposome-Associated Bupivacaine in a Cancer Pain Syndrome,” Anaesthesia, 1996, 51:578-579. |
| Legros et al. “Influence of Different Liposomal Formulations on the Pharmacokinetics of Encapsulated Bupivacaine,” [Abstract]. Anesthesiology, 1990, 73: A851. |
| Maa et al., “Liquid-liquid emulsification by rotor/stator homogenization,” J. Controlled Release, 1996, 38:219-228. |
| Maestre et al., “Contribution of Light Scattering to the Circular Dichroism of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Films, Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Polylysine Complexes, and Deoxyribonucleic Acid Particles in Ethanolic Buffers,” Biochemistry, 1980, 19(23):5214-5223. |
| Malinovsky et al., “Neurotoxilogical Assessment After Intracisternal Injection of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Rabbits,” Anesth. Analg., 1997, 85:1331-1336. |
| Mancini, “Mastering the mix: Why Leave Mixing to Chance? Get a Proper Mix and a Better Product Every Time,” Food Engineering, Mar. 1996, pp. 79-83. |
| Maranges et al., “Crossflow Filtration of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using an Unsteady Jet,” Biotechnol. Tech., 1995, 9(9): 649-654. |
| Mashimo et al. “Prolongation of Canine Epidural Anesthesia by Liposome Encapsulation of Lidocaine,” Anesth. Analg., 1992, 74:827-834. |
| Matsumoto et al., “An Attempt at Preparing Water-in-Oil-in-Water Multiple-Phase Emulsions,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1976, 57(2):353-361. |
| Meissner, D., et al., Application of High Frequency Backpulsing in Diafiltration of Multivesicular Liposomes, North American Membrane Society, Proceedings, 9.sup.th Annual Meeting, May 31-Jun. 4, 1997, Baltimore, MD, (1997). Abstract. |
| Meissner, D., et al., Application of Unsteady Flow Patterns in Permeate and Retentate for the Diafiltration of Multivesicular Lipid Based Particles, Annual AlChE Meeting, Nov. 16-21, 1997, Los Angeles, CA. Unpublished conference paper (1997). Linda Hall Library, Kansas. |
| Michaels et al., “Sparging and Agitation-Induced Injury of Cultured Animal Cells: Do Cell-to-Bubble Interactions in the Bulk Liquid Injure Cells?” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1996, 51(4):399-409. |
| Mutsakis et al., “Advances in Static Mixing Technology,” Chem. Eng. Prog, Jul. 1986, pp. 42-48. |
| Narhi et al., “Role of Native Disulfide Bonds in the Structure and Activity of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1: Genetic Models of Protein-Folding Intermediates,” Biochemistry, 1993, 32(19):5214-5221. |
| Paul, “Reaction Systems for Bulk Pharmaceutical Production,” Chem. Ind., May 21, 1990, pp. 320-325. |
| Quirk et al., “Investigation of the parameters affecting the separation of bacterial enzymes from cell debris by tangential flow filtration,” Enzyme Microb. Technol. (1984), 6(5):201-206. |
| Radlett, “The Concentration of Mammalian Cells in a Tangential Flow Filtration Unit,” J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. (1972), 22:495-499. |
| Redkar et al., “Cross-Flow Microfiltration with High-Frequency Reverse Filtration,” AlChE Journal, 1995, 41(3):501-508. |
| Rodgers et al., “Reduction of Membrane Fouling in the Ultrafiltration of Binary Protein Mixtures,” AlChE Journal, 1991, 37(10):1517-1528. |
| Roy et al., “Multivesicular liposomes containing bleomycin for subcutaneous administration,” Cancer Chernother. Pharmacol., 28(2):105-108, 1991. |
| Russack et al., “Quantitative Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytology in Patients Receiving Intracavitary Chemotherapy,” Ann. Neurol., 1993, 34(1):108-112. |
| Saberi et al., “Bubble Size and Velocity Measurement in Gas-Liquid Systems: Application of Fiber Optic Technique to Pilot Plant Scale,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 1995, 73: 253-257. |
| Shakiba et al., “Evaluation of Retinal Toxicity and Liposome Encapsulation of the Anti-CMV drug 2′-nor-cyclic GMP,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 34(10):2903-2910, 1993. |
| Skuta et al., “Filtering Surgery in Owl Monkeys Treated with the Antimetabolite 5-Fluorouridine 5′ Monophosphate Entrapped in Multivesicular Liposomes,” Am. J. Ophtmalmol., 1987, 103(5):714-716. |
| Streiff et al., “Don't overlook static-mixer reactors,” Chem. Eng., Jun. 1994, pp. 76-82. |
| Szoka et al., “Comparative properties and methods of preparation of lipid vesicles (liposomes),” Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng., 1980, 9:467-508. |
| Tanaka et al., “Crossflow Filtration of Baker's Yeast with Periodical Stopping of Permeation Flow and Bubbling,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1995, 47(3):401-404. |
| Thompson, G.A. Jr., The Regulation of Membrane Lipid Metabolism 2.sup.nd Ed., CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 1-20 (1992). |
| Tsuchiya et al., “Tortuosity of Bubble Rise Path in a Liquid-Solid Fluidized Bed: Effect of Particle Shape,” AlChE Journal, 1995, 41(6):1368-1374. |
| Turski et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Rabbit Brain after Intracarotid Injection of Large Multivesicular Liposomes Containing Paramagnetic Metals and DTPA,” Magn. Reson. Med., 7(2):184-196, 1998. |
| Watts et al., “Microencapsulation Using Emulsification/Solvent Evaporation: An Overview of Techniques and Applications,” Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1990, 7(3):235-259. |
| Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2018, Exparel® prescribing information, 28 pp. |
