Patent Application
20240239710
The current invention is applied in the field of the 100% mineral additives for concrete, more specifically those that have hydrophobic and waterproofing properties, to improve the mechanical properties of the concrete further.
The concrete additive described in this document is used in several lines of civil construction, such as: construction of bridges, viaducts, tunnels, cisterns, sidewalks, building foundations, etc. In summary, the additive is recommended for any application where the concrete is exposed to an environment with high humidity and therefore the protection against it is required.
The process already known in the state of the art for waterproofing concrete uses a waterproofing blanket that requires specific equipment and tools. The application of this blanket, in addition to compromising the worker's health, also compromises his/her safety.
Following such a method, methane gas is used to burn and adhere the waterproofing blanket. This gas has risky handling, is highly harmful to the environment, and also requires specialized labor to prevent any type of accident.
Once the blanket application is complete, a watertightness test of the structure is required, which can take up to 15 days, resulting in delays in the construction schedule. After this test, a mechanical protection for the concrete is indicated, so as not to damage what has already been done, additionally never being able to do any kind of drilling in the slab, because this would perforate the blanket and compromise the entire structure.
Some solutions in the state of the art that make it possible to solve, in an acceptable way, such problems in the usual processes of waterproofing are already found. However, none of the solutions is optimal and the current invention has significant improvements related to the results achieved.
The document WO1999028264, which has the priority year 1997, presents a concrete additive consisting of at least one pozzolanic material, such as microsilica, and one hydrophobic material, such as calcium stearate.
Despite the inclusion of some of the components of the concrete additive composition described in the current patent, the above-mentioned application does not perform the same manufacturing process, and its results are inferior to the results achieved by the current invention.
The document CN111410454, filed in 2019, reveals to us a method for preparing “superhydrophobic” concrete where there is, as in the previous document, the addition of microsilica and calcium stearate.
In the same sense as the PCT document, the Chinese document does not present the same method of manufacturing and mixing of the components of the present invention and, therefore, does not achieve its results.
The current invention comprises a PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING AND COMPOSING A CONCRETE ADDITIVE that adds hydrophobic and waterproofing properties to concrete and improves its mechanical properties.
Additionally, by its hydrophobic and waterproofing action, the additive prevents the concrete from retaining moisture and, as a result, prevents fungi and bacteria. This technical effect has been tested and approved by the Healthy Building Certificate.
The additive is applied in mortars and concrete, reacting with cement during the hydration process, giving rise to inert mineral substances that block the capillary net, providing high impermeability to mortar and concrete. Additionally, the filling of voids provides a significant improvement in the mechanical resistance.
In an optional application, the concrete additive may further comprise superplasticizers and defoamers in amounts noted in the detailed description of the invention.
The great difference of the current invention when compared to other solutions present in the state of the art is that the manufacturing process contributes directly to the results achieved by the additive. The process involves mixing and heating several elements, which will be exposed later, with a prefabricated formulation that will also be exposed in this document.
Therefore, the process disclosed in this invention is as important as the composition of the additive, and a change in either would diminish the results obtained.
Tests were performed to verify the difference in concrete durability by comparing the results of samples with and without the additive disclosed in the current patent. For this, the same materials (cement, sand, gravel and water) and the same temperature and external pressure conditions were used for all samples.
The results obtained in the study commented above showed significant improvements on all fronts, where there was a 14% reduction in the void index, a 15% reduction in water absorption, a 35% reduction in pressure water penetration, and a 500% reduction in capillary rise height.
Regarding the duration of the effects achieved by the concrete additive, we can state that no decrease is observed over time, and its effects are permanent. This occurs because its use gives rise to inert mineral substances.
We can also state that, by reducing the causes of concrete degradation (results of the study mentioned above), the additive also protects it from aggregate alkali reactions and from corrosion caused by moisture, thus increasing its structural durability.
Depending on the dosage of concrete additive used in the final product, it is possible that the concrete reaches 100% impermeability and 100% water-repellency. However, it is not interesting that the final product reaches 100% water-repellency, because it would make the anchorage of paints or other coatings unfeasible, therefore it is recommended that the final product allows 0.3 mm of anchorage.
The
The
The current patent proposes a PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURING AND COMPOSITION OF CONCRETE ADDITIVE comprising in its composition (in mass): 30% to 50% AC mortar, 22% to 28% Portland cement, 15% to 25% calcium carbonate, 2% to 9% a pore blocker, preferably active microsilica, 3% to 7% a hydrophobic compound, preferably calcium stearate and 0.5% to 1.5% a formulation produced separately before mixing the other products.
The formulation mentioned above is composed (in mass) of 30% to 60% Portland cement, preferably 50%, 20% to 50% hydrophobic compound (calcium stearate), preferably 45% and 3% to 10% graphite, preferably 5%, which pass through an equipment of preferably 1,500 watts of power that, by electrofusion, heats and mixes, at a temperature of 70° C. to 150° C., preferably 140° C., for a period of 2 to 5 minutes, preferably 3 minutes. After this step, the mixture is transferred to a particle grinder to homogenize it properly, leaving nothing solid (the heating above may solidify some parts of the mixture). The mixture is properly weighed from 0.5% to 1.5%, preferably 1%, this formulation is placed in the secondary mixer, for a second mixing and heating, culminating in the final product. For convenience, we will call this formulation “formulation A”.
With the previously produced formulation A, all components (formulation A, Portland cement, AC mortar, calcium carbonate, pore blocker and hydrophobic compound) are mixed together while being heated at a temperature of 70° C. to 170° C. (preferably 120° C.) for 20 to 30 minutes. After this time, the final mixture is sent to a resting silo, where it is subsequently bagged.
Any change in the time and temperature ranges of the manufacturing method will cause gradual loss of results in the final product, and it is always recommended to use the preferred temperature and time indicated. As a more extreme example, if the heating temperature of the mixture is exceeded, the components may burn and, as a consequence, the hydrophobic, waterproofing, and strength results of the concrete additive may be lost.
To understand the manufacturing process of the concrete additive better,
Although the additive shows the improvements reported above when manufactured following the ranges stipulated above, the optimal results are achieved with the following composition:
Not only can the dosage ranges of the mixture components be changed, but also the components themselves can be replaced by similar ones. However, the components described above were the ones that showed the best results.
Following this line of thought, the mortar can be chosen among the classifications AC1, AC2 and AC3, depending on the type of application. Taking as an example, the AC1 classification is usually used for laying ceramic tiles and floors, while AC2 is chosen when the use is for outdoor environments and, finally, AC3 is the most adherent of the three and is commonly used for laying linings in hot water pools or saunas.
All types of Portland cement can be used. However, the best results were achieved with the type CP2. Depending on the type of application, Portland cement CP2 can be replaced by, for example, types CP1 (common), CP3 (blast furnace), CP4 (pozzolanic), CP V-ARI (high early strength), etc.
Calcium carbonate, also known as calcite, is a chemically inert, inorganic mineral extracted from mines and refined in various granulometric ranges according to the desired application. It has the function of helping in waterproofing and has encapsulated water-repellent characteristics.
Calcium stearate is the hydrophobic and waterproofing compound that can be replaced by: unsaturated fatty acids and their salts, with chains from C10 to C24, which can be stearic acid, magnesium stearate, sodium stearate, potassium stearate, fumaryl stearate, zinc stearate, aluminum stearate, and salts of transition metals. The following can also be used as hydrophobic compounds: silane, siloxanes, silicone, or a mixture of these.
Regarding the physical property, the calcium stearate or substitute material should have the average particle size (D50), when in the solid state, should be 100 nm to 50 μm, more preferably in the nanometer scale of 400 nm to 2000 nm.
The active microsilica is responsible for blocking concrete pores, since microsilica particles are 50 to 100 times smaller than cement grains and, depending on the degree of dispersion, fill up to 100% of the voids between them, making the concrete denser and thus ensuring lower permeability, excellent thixotropy, and strength by ensuring improved void filling, which significantly improves concrete resistance.
Microsilica can be replaced by: talc, pozzolans, graphite, graphene oxide, aluminosilicates such as bentonite, silicates, granulated blast furnace slag, calcined clays, fly ash, metakaolinite, calcite, aragonite, solid greases, and acrylic emulsions.
The pore blocker (the microsilica or its substitutes), should be thinly divided; the average particle size (D50) should be 500 nm to 100 μm.
In addition to the components described above, the current invention also discloses other concretizations where superplasticizer components are added, from 3% to 30% by mass and/or defoamers from 1% to 10% by mass and/or 0.2% to 1% by mass of graphene. The addition of these components is done at the time of mixing all the components, participating in the mixing and heating step along with the other components.
The superplasticizer can be one of the following (or a mixture of them): lignosulfonate, naphthalene formaldehyde sulfonate, melamine formaldehyde sulfonate, polycarboxylate esters.
The anti-foam can be one of the following components (or a mixture of them): mineral oil, silicone oil, vegetable oil, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, and polymethylacrylate.
Finally, the graphene is responsible for the improvement in the flexural resistance of the concrete, which can be more than 20% higher than concrete without the additive, depending on the dosage of additive used in the concrete.
As an example of complementary composition, we can cite:
The application of the concrete additive is done in the concrete mixer, and first the concrete without additive must be homogenized. After this homogenization, add the additive and homogenize for another 10 minutes, and then it is ready for the final application.
The recommended dosage of water repellent and waterproofing additive varies according to its application. Some of the most common applications are found in the spreadsheet in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR1020210101040 | May 2021 | BR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/BR2022/050103 | 3/22/2022 | WO |
