The present invention is generally related to manufacturing systems, and more particularly is related to manufacturing systems using a wireless link to communicate with a device under test.
The concept of using communications in the manufacturing process is well known. However, most communications techniques used in manufacturing involve the use of connectors between the system monitoring the manufacturing and the device being manufactured.
Such an approach is impractical if the device being manufactured needs to be tested in as close to real-world operating conditions as possible. For example, if the performance of the device might change if the device were opened sufficiently as to connect a sensing device physically, the use of a connector becomes an unacceptable approach, but the prior art has not fully addressed this problem.
Further, for devices requiring calibration during manufacture, the prior art typically has required a port in the device by which a connector can be physically attached to the device to permit control by the manufacturing system. For devices which have no external port, the approach of using a physical connection is unworkable, and another solution is required. For such devices, it is desirable that the communication system include a wireless link between the host system and the DUT. It is also desirable that such a communication system minimizes the cost added to each individual device as the result of testing.
In addition, the ability to log performance data for a device being manufactured, and therefore to be able to track a device's entire manufacturing history, without ever physically connecting a monitoring system to the device, has not been possible in the prior art.
As a result, there has been a need for a system and method by which a device under test can be sealed so as to operate in conditions essentially identical to real world conditions, and at the same time able to respond to provide to the manufacturing system full data concerning the performance of the device, while also being able to respond to calibration instructions from the manufacturing system. And, of course, the communications link that provides all of these features must be inexpensive, but must also be reliable and operable by manufacturing personnel without extensive training.
In the high volume manufacturing of low-cost devices with high degree of complexity and stringent quality control requirement, it is very desirable to have 100% device testing with automated manufacturing test tool. An example is the manufacturing of portable medical devices. To permit a desired level of automation, the system requires some form of communication system which links a computer-controlled host test tool and a device under test (DUT).
The present invention provides a substantially automatic test system for performing, among other things, data gathering, quality assurance and device certification testing. In an aspect of the invention, an asymmetric infrared (IR) optical communications link is provided to permit communication between the manufacturing host test tools and the DUT. In an embodiment of this asymmetric system, all the communication complexity is shifted to the host test tool hardware and the communication control software, which resides in both the DUT and the host computer. This technique allows one to minimize the complexity of the device communication hardware and therefore the device unit cost.
In order to realize the full benefit of the automated testing, it is desirable to have a host test fixture that easily aligns the optical IR communication link between the transceivers of the host test tool and the DUT.
The device under test is then operated under the control of the manufacturing system, with communications flowing from the manufacturing system to the device and the device responding by generating the outputs appropriate for that specific device. The outputs are logged and compared with expected results, and the host can then calibrate the outputs to ensure that they are within specifications.
These and other aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated from the following detailed description of the invention, taken in combination with the appended Figures.
An embodiment of a manufacturing system and a mechanical alignment fixture in accordance with the invention is shown in
An embodiment of the asymmetric IR communication hardware function block is shown in
The optical signal is free-space coupled to the host test tool in the drop-in cradle fixture that mechanically aligns the optical transceivers of the DUT and the host tool to within a short range. For the illustrated embodiment, on the host test tool side, the optical transceiver circuit is significantly more complex to accommodate the weak optical signal and the poor detection sensitivity from the device side. There is a significantly higher power broadcast LED 301 with a higher current drive circuit 302 to “talk” to, or transmit signals to, the device. There is also a more complex photo-detector 303 with additional electronic signal conditioning circuit 304 to “listen” to, or receive signals from, the device. The conditioned signals are hardwired to a test electronics system that performs the appropriate signal level shifting 305 to interface with the host computer 300. The test electronics system also comprises other instrument drivers 306 for coordinating the automated testing tasks. The entire automation sequence is directed by the host software in the control computer 300.
For at least some embodiments of the manufacturing system, it is desirable to have a more reliable communications link than can be provided by the hardware asymmetry alone. Due to the weak and un-modulated optical signal from the simple device transceiver, the interference from the ambient lighting can cause occasional data corruption. In such embodiments, it is desirable to also have a robust communication software protocol to create a fault free link. One embodiment of a suitable error correction protocol is outlined in
In this scheme, the communication data integrity is accomplished by a sequence of asynchronous “handshaking” between the host computer and the DUT. The same protocol resides in both the host and the DUT. Each transmitting message is encoded in a data packet 400 with a leading transmitting ID (TID) 401. Each data packet is also terminated with a set of robust checksum bytes 402 computed from the entire data packet byte values using an algorithm such as a 32-bit CRC checksum. Upon successfully receiving the transmitting data packet with the proper checksum value, the receiver transmits an acknowledging data packet 500 back to the sender. This acknowledging data packet also contains a leading acknowledging ID (AID) 501 followed by the original TID 502. It also ends with a checksum 503 for the acknowledging data packet. Once this is received back at the sender, the packet integrity checksum and the original TID will be verified against the expected values. If verified, the sender knows that the receiver has successfully received the original transmitted message. The sender will increment the TID after a successful transmission. If there is no successful acknowledging data packet received within a certain set duration, the sender will not increment the TID of the original transmitting data packet and will attempt again to send the same data packet again. This repeats until a successful acknowledging packet is received or the entire process times out.
The asymmetric optical transceiver communication hardware in combination with the error correcting software resides in both the host test tool and the device under test enables fully automated manufacturing testing and qualification of a complex product. This is especially well suited for high volume manufacturing of medical devices with potential safety risk that requires individual software configuration and rigorous safety certification.
An example is a portable cosmetic laser treatment device. An embodiment of a manufacturing test process flow chart is shown in
At each testing step, data from the test is collected which provides a complete history for each DUT. The host computer automatically determines the pass/fail status based on the data collected 606. If a failure is detected, the device can be debugged using the data collected from the device through the IR link and then returned to assembly for rework. If the DUT requires a certification, such as a certification that the device complies with a particular laser class, for example, the standards set forth in 21 CFR 1040.10 or IEC 60825-1, a certified pass key can also be loaded onto the device automatically after the DUT completes the appropriate testing successfully. Thus, in the present invention, the key manufacturing steps of (1) device configuration and data collection, (2) quality assurance, and (3) certification are all automatically controlled and coordinated by the host computer through the asymmetric IR communication link.
Having fully described a preferred embodiment of the invention and various alternatives, those skilled in the art will recognize, given the teachings herein, that numerous alternatives and equivalents exist which do not depart from the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention not be limited by the foregoing description, but only by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/944,080, filed on Jun. 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4240738 | Praamsma | Dec 1980 | A |
4837568 | Snaper | Jun 1989 | A |
5295052 | Chin et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
6536914 | Hoelen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6944402 | Baker et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7068910 | Duine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7274876 | Gerszberg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7330661 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7565082 | Yazaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7792425 | Aronson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010046131 | Hoelen et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030080755 | Kobayashi | May 2003 | A1 |
20040037566 | Willebrand et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040120151 | Ostler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050276072 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060206103 | Altshuler et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070014415 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070129711 | Altshuler et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070223930 | Ternullo et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080310836 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60944080 | Jun 2007 | US |