In the following, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described referring to the figures, where:
In
The format comprises three zones: first a lead-in zone 11, next a data zone 13 and finally a lead-out zone 15. The data zone 13 comprises a block 3 with a UDF anchor and partition information, after that the UDF partition starts in 5. The UDF file system information and file data are shown as 7 and it comprises a special file 9 with BDFS content. At 17, the UDF partition ends.
According to the present invention in order to obtain seamless playback of video, the UDF and BDFS extents should be matched as good as possible. Both file systems should, when they allocate their extents, take into account the extent sizes of the other file system to preserve the BDFS allocation rules as best as possible.
One way of doing this is to create UDF extents. These UDF extents should be created such that an optimal match between the UDF extents and the BDFS extents is possible in a way that the BDFS allocation rules are maintained as much as possible.
This is illustrated in
In
The solution to this problem is illustrated in
Another simpler example is the situation in
In
Two examples of performing this mapping could be:
Thereby the following steps are performed from the host point:
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word ‘comprising’ does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed in a claim. The invention can be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In a device claim enumerating several means, several of these means can be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04103601.3 | Jul 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB05/52415 | 7/19/2005 | WO | 00 | 1/24/2007 |