This disclosure generally relates to towed streamers for use in acquiring seismic data, and more specifically, to adjusting the skin stiffness of the towed streamers.
Seismic exploration involves surveying subterranean geological formations for hydrocarbon deposits. A seismic survey typically involves deploying seismic source(s) and seismic sensors at predetermined locations. The sources generate seismic waves, which propagate into the geological formations creating pressure changes and vibrations along their way. Changes in elastic properties of the geological formation scatter the seismic waves, changing their direction of propagation and other properties. Part of the energy emitted by the sources reaches the seismic sensors. Some seismic sensors are sensitive to pressure changes (hydrophones), others to particle motion (e.g., geophones), and industrial surveys may deploy only one type of sensors or both. In response to the detected seismic events, the sensors generate electrical signals to produce seismic data. Analysis of the seismic data can then indicate the presence or absence of probable locations of hydrocarbon deposits.
Some surveys are known as “marine” surveys because they are conducted in marine environments. However, “marine” surveys may be conducted not only in saltwater environments, but also in fresh and brackish waters. In one type of marine survey, called a “towed-array” survey, an array of seismic sensor-containing streamers and sources is towed behind a survey vessel.
In one embodiment, a seismic streamer includes an outer skin for encapsulating various seismic data acquisition devices, including one or more seismic sensors. The streamer skin according to the present disclosure has a modulus of elasticity of at least 30 MPa. In some embodiments, the skin may be formed to include exterior and/or interior ribs. Related methods are described.
Advantages and other features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following drawing, description and claims.
In accordance with embodiments of the disclosure, the seismic sensors 58 may be pressure sensors only or may be multi-component seismic sensors. For the case of multi-component seismic sensors, each sensor is capable of detecting a pressure wavefield and at least one component of a particle motion that is associated with acoustic signals that are proximate to the multi-component seismic sensor. Examples of particle motions include one or more components of a particle displacement, one or more components (inline (x), crossline (y) and vertical (z) components (see axes 59, for example)) of a particle velocity and one or more components of a particle acceleration.
Depending on the particular embodiment of the disclosure, the multi-component seismic sensor may include one or more hydrophones, geophones, particle displacement sensors, particle velocity sensors, accelerometers, pressure gradient sensors, or combinations thereof.
For example, in accordance with some embodiments of the disclosure, a particular multi-component seismic sensor may include a hydrophone for measuring pressure and three orthogonally-aligned accelerometers to measure three corresponding orthogonal components of particle velocity and/or acceleration near the seismic sensor. It is noted that the multi-component seismic sensor may be implemented as a single device or may be implemented as a plurality of devices, depending on the particular embodiment of the disclosure. A particular multi-component seismic sensor may also include pressure gradient sensors, which constitute another type of particle motion sensors. Each pressure gradient sensor measures the change in the pressure wavefield at a particular point with respect to a particular direction. For example, one of the pressure gradient sensors may acquire seismic data indicative of, at a particular point, the partial derivative of the pressure wavefield with respect to the crossline direction, and another one of the pressure gradient sensors may acquire, a particular point, seismic data indicative of the pressure data with respect to the inline direction.
The marine seismic data acquisition system 10 includes a seismic source 103 that may be formed from one or more seismic source elements, such as air guns, for example, which are connected to the survey vessel 20. Alternatively, in other embodiments of the disclosure, the seismic source 103 may operate independently of the survey vessel 20, in that the seismic source 103 may be coupled to other vessels or buoys, as just a few examples.
As the seismic streamers 30 are towed behind the survey vessel 20, acoustic signals 42 (an exemplary acoustic signal 42 being depicted in
The incident acoustic signals 42 that are emitted by the sources 104 produce corresponding reflected acoustic signals, or pressure waves 60, which are sensed by the seismic sensors 58. It is noted that the pressure waves that are received and sensed by the seismic sensors 58 include “up going” pressure waves that propagate to the sensors 58 without reflection, as well as “down going” pressure waves that are produced by reflections of the pressure waves 60 from an air-water boundary 31.
The seismic sensors 58 generate signals (digital signals, for example), called “traces,” which indicate the acquired measurements of the pressure wavefield and particle motion (if the sensors are particle motion sensors). The traces are recorded and may be at least partially processed by a signal processing unit 23 that is deployed on the survey vessel 20, in accordance with some embodiments of the disclosure. For example, a particular multi-component seismic sensor may provide a trace, which corresponds to a measure of a pressure wavefield by its hydrophone; and the sensor may provide one or more traces that correspond to one or more components of particle motion, which are measured by its accelerometers.
The goal of the seismic acquisition is to build up an image of a survey area for purposes of identifying subterranean geological formations, such as the exemplary geological formation 65. Subsequent analysis of the representation may reveal probable locations of hydrocarbon deposits in subterranean geological formations. Depending on the particular embodiment of the disclosure, portions of the analysis of the representation may be performed on the seismic survey vessel 20, such as by the signal processing unit 23.
The main mechanical parts of a conventional streamer typically include skin (the outer covering); one or more stress members; seismic sensors; spacers to support the skin and protect the seismic sensors; and a filler material. In general, the filler material typically has a density to make the overall streamer neutrally buoyant; and the filler material typically has properties that make the material acoustically transparent and electrically non conductive. Certain fluids (kerosene, for example) possess these properties and thus, may be used as streamer filler materials. However, a fluid's ability to dampen vibration waves that propagate along with the streamer is limited.
When gel is used as the filler material, the noise picture changes, as gel is more sensitive to flow noise than fluid. More specifically, the main mechanical difference between fluid and gel as a filler material is the shear stiffness. A fluid has zero shear stiffness, and shear stresses from viscous effects typically are negligible. The shear stiffness is what makes a gel possess solid-like properties. It has been discovered through modeling that the shear stiffness in gel degrades the averaging of flow noise. The degradation in the flow noise cancellation may be attributable to relatively little amount of gel being effectively available to communicate the pressure between each side of the spacer.
Referring to
Turbulent noise is generally caused by turbulent flow external to the streamer skin as the streamer flows through the water column. In the past, liquid-filled streamers have had a relatively soft skin (e.g., as measured via modulus of elasticity) to permit proper handling, e.g., moving, reeling and storing the streamer. Although turbulent noise within liquid-filled streamers has been a concern, it has been found that such noise can be mitigated without adjusting the stiffness of the skin.
Turbulent noise, however, becomes more problematic when operating with gel-filled streamers. That is, gel-filled streamers tend to concentrate the leaked turbulent flow locally around the sensor, thus compromising the data acquired by the sensor. In accordance with the principles of the present disclosure, turbulent noise within a gel-filled streamer 30 can be reduced by increasing the stiffness of the skin 130. Streamer skin used with conventional liquid-filled streamers is typically manufactured to have a modulus of elasticity in the range of 20-25 MPa. According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, the skin 130 is formed of a thermal plastic polyurethane elastomer having a modulus of elasticity of at least 30 MPa. When towing a streamer through water, the friction between the streamer and the water causes turbulent flow, which imparts pressure on the streamer skin. The pressure acting on the streamer can thus generate flow noise within the streamer by leaking through the streamer skin. However, increasing the skin stiffness according to the present disclosure reduces the amount of pressure that leaks through the skin, and thus reduces the turbulent flow noise within the streamer. In some embodiments, the streamer skin may have a modulus of elasticity in the range of 30 MPa to 150 MPa, or more particularly 45-65 MPa, or even more particularly approximately 55 MPa. In some embodiments, the modulus of elasticity of the skin varies from an exterior surface of the skin to an interior surface of the skin.
Referring to
While the present disclosure has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. For example, it is contemplated that the sensor element may be housed in a material that has equal, less or greater shear stiffness than the surrounding filler gel 104. Also, it is to be appreciated that the streamer skin may be manufactured according to a number of processes, including dual layer extrusion and three layer extrusion processes. Such processes may involve polymers having different properties. The streamer skin 102 may also be formed to have a varying stiffness from an exterior circumference to an interior circumference of the skin. Indeed, in some embodiments, the skin 102 may have a higher modulus of elasticity along the exterior circumference relative to the interior circumference. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3290645 | Pavey, Jr. et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3781778 | Sawin et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4300218 | Kruka et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4402069 | Miller et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4410012 | Redding et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4638469 | Bryant et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4809243 | Bledsoe et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5272679 | Carpenter | Dec 1993 | A |
5274603 | Zibilich, Jr. et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5682925 | Seckel | Nov 1997 | A |
5777954 | Hepp | Jul 1998 | A |
5943293 | Luscombe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6185154 | Miller | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6477111 | Lunde et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7298672 | Tenghamn et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7382689 | Maples et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7460434 | Stenzel et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468932 | Tenghamn | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7518948 | Stenzel et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7548486 | Tenghamn | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573781 | Fernihough et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7623414 | Boergen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7693005 | Stenzel et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7872942 | Sollner | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20040017731 | Halvorsen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060239117 | Singh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070195648 | Borgen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258321 | Tenghamn | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258331 | Bevan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258831 | Irick | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297286 | Stenzel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008034 | Tenghamn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074946 | Hillesund et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080117717 | Borgen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080175098 | Tenghamn | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186803 | McKey et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090010101 | Lunde et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100039889 | Teigen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039890 | Tustin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100165792 | Stenzel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110044129 | Traetten et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044130 | Traetten et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110240329 | Ruffa | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273957 | Guizelin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2439816 | Jan 2008 | GB |
2011022673 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Definition of “intermittent,” Dictionary.com, downloaded Mar. 23, 2014 from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/intermittent, pp. 1-3. |
“Thermoplastic polyurethane,” Wikipedia, 2014, downloaded Sep. 22, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoplastic—polyurethane, pp. 1-3. |
“Thermoplastic elastomer,” Wikipedia, 2008, downloaded from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thermoplastic—elastomer&oldid=188602510 on Sep. 23, 2014, pp. 1-2. |
PCT Search Report, dated Feb. 28, 2011, Application No. PCT/US2010/046197. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/046191 dated Feb. 28, 2011: pp. 1-8. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/046200 dated Feb. 28, 2011: pp. 1-8. |
“OCS EIS/EA MMS 2006-038: Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment—Arctic Ocean Outer Continental Shelf Seismic Surveys—2006,” Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region, 2006: pp. PEA-1-PEA-294. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110044128 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |