The present invention generally concerns the technique of manufacturing articles to be included in cans, in particular beverage cans. The invention is specifically, but not exclusively, related to articles in the form of opening tabs to be attached to shells for forming ends to such cans.
In a brochure entitled “This is PLM Fosie” issued by Applicant's Swedish company PLM Fosie AB in the mid nineties, there is shown on p. 6 how can ends are produced.
In a first production stage, a thin metal strip, preferably a 0.23-mm-thick aluminum strip, is fed to a processing apparatus in which the strip is punched and stamped to form opening tabs integrated with the strip. The tabs are also referred to as opener rings by persons skilled in the art.
In a second production stage, circular shells for forming the can ends are die cut from a thin metal sheet, preferably a 0.23-mm-thick aluminum sheet. Each shell is scored for opening, and a rivet for attachment of the tab is formed at the center of the shell.
In a third production stage, the strip with the integrated tabs are joined with the circular shells in an attachment station, in which the tabs are separated from the strip and attached to the shells by riveting. A finished can end is achieved when the tab is fastened to the shell.
This manufacture of can ends is conventional and well known to the skilled person. It should be mentioned that the whole process is automated with a capacity of about 2,000 ends per line per minute. In the beverage can industry, the production rate in general is very high and it is a continuous aim to decrease the production costs and the material used for can production, including the ends. Maintenance, tool changes and other downtime should be avoided to keep costs low.
As in other areas of the food and beverage industry, the traceability of the manufacturing and filling of the can is important. Today, there are so-called traceability marks or markings on the cans indicating when the filling took place and also when the main can body was manufactured. Normally, however, there is no traceability marking indicating when the finished can ends were produced. Such markings are often required for reasons of quality. For instance, the peripheral edge of the shell must be precisely formed to ensure a completely tight seam against the upper flange of the can. There are also several functional requirements placed on the tab and on the attachment of the same to the shell.
Except for the purpose of indicating the origin of the tabs, the markings on the same may also be used in other contexts. In a commercial aspect, markings on the bottom surface of the tab may indicate the winner in a lottery or the like. The quality requirements on such “promotional” markings are normally the same as in the cases where the origin is indicated.
Thus, there is a need for indicative markings on the tabs and the shells as well as on the can body.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,910 discloses an arrangement for producing marked tabs from a continuous strip of metal. This arrangement comprises a press which, by a stamping and punching operation, shapes the strip into tabs to be included in cans. A feeder is arranged to intermittently feed the strip through the press at a rate commensurate with the operation of press. Markings are provided on a surface of the strip by means of an embossing machine arranged upstream of the press. The embossing machine comprises a plurality of embossing stamps arranged in an indexing wheel, so that different markings can be applied to the strip. Another machine for mechanically providing indicative markings on sheet metal by a stamping operation is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,476,781.
One general problem in using such stamping or embossing operations to provide small indicative markings on metal surfaces is that these surfaces should be non-coated for acceptable results. Thus, surfaces that are coated with lacquer and/or paint can not readily be provided with such markings. The task of providing markings on the tab is especially difficult, due to the small tab surfaces available and the high requirements of elevated production rate. For material saving reasons, modern opening tabs are quite small, inevitably leaving only very limited tab surfaces for markings at high speed. If such markings are to be provided by stamping operations or the like, the tab surfaces must be increased. However, a this calls for costly changes in the production equipment, increases the material cost and involves a risk of non-acceptance by the consumers. Further, the layout of “promotional” markings might be changed quite frequently, calling for frequent change of the tooling used for stamping the markings. Since such tooling is quite expensive, the cost for providing “promotional” markings can be considerable.
The object of the invention is to find a solution to the above described problems and to provide an improved technique for manufacturing articles to be included in cans, which articles have distinct and indicative markings.
This object is achieved by a laser unit and an arrangement according to the appended independent claims. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
The invention brings out several advantages. An enhanced technique of providing distinct markings on the article is accomplished, also when very limited areas are available for marking, such as on opening tabs. The new technique is suitable for the high production rates required in modern beverage can manufacturing. Further, the use of laser radiation permits marking of both non-coated and coated surfaces. Also, the layout of the markings can easily be changed, for example by input of a new engraving pattern to a control unit, e.g. a computer, that controls the engraving operation performed by the laser unit. In the case of traceability markings, the pattern can be updated every minute to provide an exact indication of when the finished article was produced. Likewise, promotional markings can be provided with great flexibility. Further, since a standard tab can be used, there is no need for tool change in the production line when no laser engravings are desired. The same production line can be used in both cases, since the operation of the laser unit in the preferred embodiment is easily disconnectible.
In the following, presently preferred embodiments of the invention will be described, reference being made to the accompanying schematic drawings.
The strip S is guided by a guiding device 5 when passing below the laser unit 2, and fed from the supply 1 by a feeding means 6 arranged in association with the tab forming unit 4. In the unit 4, the strip S is punched and stamped to form the tabs T integrated with the strip S.
In this type of arrangement, the strip S is only intermittently fed, or indexed, into the tab forming unit 4. Thus, the feeding means 6 is activated to feed the strip S after each completed stamping and punching operation in the tab forming unit 4.
The feeding rate of the strip S and the operation of the laser unit 2 are controlled by a computerized control unit 7 connected to the strip feeding means 6 and the laser unit 2. The laser unit 2, which will be described more in detail below, comprises a high-power and high-speed laser 100 capable of providing engravings in the tab surface, preferably with a depth of about 1-5 μm. Thus, the laser unit 2 is arranged between the strip supply 1 and the tab forming unit 4. Between the laser unit 2 and the guiding means 5 there is provided a device 8 for protecting the laser unit 2 from dust produced in the engraving process. It should be pointed out that the laser unit 2 may be installed in a standard production line for tabs T. The operation of the laser unit 2 may be disconnected, in which case the tab production line is used in a conventional manner.
The purpose of the laser unit 2 is to provide indicative, laser engraved markings on at least one of the upper and lower surfaces of the strip S depending on whether markings are desired on the top surface or on the bottom surface of the tab T, or on both these surfaces. In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
The top markings A2, CC, 56 on the tab T shown in
The bottom markings WIN, A, 98 on the tab T shown in
As indicated in FIG. 1 and shown in detail in
It is preferred that the laser 100 generates radiation in the near IR region of approximately 1-10 μm since aluminum, normally used for manufacture of cans, exhibits high absorption of radiation in this region.
Further, it is preferred that the laser 100 is capable of generating pulsed laser radiation, since the maximum power of a laser pulse can be many times the rated power of the laser. This will increase the engraving efficiency of the laser unit 2.
In the most preferred embodiment, shown in
The laser 100 of
Excellent results have been achieved in practice by a modified version of a diode laser pumped Nd:YAG laser (DynaMark T2) marketed by the German company IWKA. The laser emits pulses with a duration of 25 ns in a cycle time of approximately 0.1-1 μs. The average power per pulse is 25 kW, with a peak pulse power of about 100 kW. This laser power is adequate for engraving colored metal surfaces, but should be increased when engraving bare metal surfaces.
The scanner head 150 of
Each deflection device 152, 153 controls the deflection of the laser beam in one respective direction (x, y). By the combined action of the two deflection devices 152, 153, the laser beam L can be controlled in two dimensions over the strip surface. The deflection devices 152, 153, as well as the laser 100, are operated by the computerized control unit 7 (FIG. 1). Preferably, the deflection devices 152, 153 are galvanometers of a type known per se, in which the rotation of a mirror 155, 156 is controlled by means of an electromagnetic field and feedback control.
After passing the deflection devices 152, 153 the laser beam is directed through the lens arrangement 154, preferably a so-called flat-field lens. Such a flat-field lens is designed to focus the laser beam L perpendicular to a geometrical plane, in this case the strip surface. The focal length of the flat-field lens should be chosen with great care. With a large focal length, a small rotation of the mirrors 155, 156 will yield a large movement of the focal spot P on the strip surface, thereby allowing for fast displacement of the spot P. However, a too large focal length will yield a low precision in the positioning of the spot P as well as a larger spot size. A focal length of 120-190 mm has been found adequate, and optimum performance is achieved with a focal length of about 150-180 mm.
In the embodiment shown on the drawings, the control unit 7 is adapted to receive a pattern to be engraved on the surface of the strip S. This pattern is stored in a memory 9. A processor 10 is adapted to operate the laser unit 2 to produce the pattern in the strip surface. More specifically, the processor 10 is adapted to control the laser 100 to generate a laser pulse, and the scanner 150 to direct the laser radiation to a desired location P on the strip surface. Preferably, the processor 10 controls the time period between successive laser pulses, by controlling the Q-switch 105 and the diode lasers 104 of the laser 100, such that each laser pulse has sufficient energy to generate a visible pit with a depth of about 1-5 μm in the strip surface. Thus, although not evident from the drawings, each marking engraved in the strip surface is formed by a large number of such pits. Between each laser pulse, the mirrors 155, 156 of the deflection devices 152, 153 are controlled to move to a new location, thereby producing the pattern in the strip surface.
Since only a limited time period is available for producing the desired pattern in the strip surface, the processor 10 is adapted to, when a pattern is fed to and stored in the memory 9, calculate the positions of all pits in the strip surface. Further, before operating the laser unit 2, the processor 10 determines the optimum engraving path, i.e. the order in which the pits should be produced in the strip surface to form the pattern. In this context, it is preferred that the markings or characters in the pattern are engraved sequentially, i.e. that one marking is completed before another marking is provided. This approach has the ability of increasing both the engraving speed and the engraving accuracy, by minimizing vibrations in the mirrors 155, 156. Such vibrations might occur when the mirrors 155, 156 are brought to a halt on rotation to a new position, especially if the mirrors 155, 156 are rotated over a large angle. Thus, the distance between subsequent pits should be minimized.
As shown in
In order for the tab forming unit 4 to form each tab from the intended portion of the strip S (cf. the laser-engraved areas marked by ghost lines in FIG. 4), the engraving operation should be effected as close as possible to the tab forming operation. However, the laser unit 2 should preferably be physically disconnected from the tab forming unit 4 due to the excessive vibrations produced in the latter. Preferably, a sensor (not shown) is arranged in association with the strip feeding means 6 or the tab forming unit 4. The sensor is adapted to indicate when the strip 1 is in an immobilized condition, e.g. by sensing a dwell condition of the strip feeding means 6, or the tab forming unit 4. The output signal of the sensor is fed to the control unit 7 which initiates the laser engraving operation on the surface of the immobilized strip S.
The laser unit 2 is disconnectible, which makes it possible to use the apparatus as a standard production line as well, even temporarily.
By effecting the laser engraving operation during the dwell time of the strip feeding means 6, the strip can be completely immobilized during the engraving operation. Typically, the tab production unit 4 operates at a speed of 640 strokes/min or higher, with the strip S being immobilized during approximately 60 ms. In this time, the inventive laser unit is capable of providing three laterally spaced tab-forming strip portions with six laser-engraved letters each, the letters having a height of about 1.4-2 mm (cf. FIG. 4).
Finally, it should be emphasized that the invention by no means is restricted to the embodiments described in the foregoing, and modifications are feasible within the scope of the appended claims. For example, a cw CO2 laser could be used, although the focal spot P will be comparatively large since the laser has non-optimum mode characteristics and yields radiation at a longer wavelength (10.6 μm). Other suitable laser types might be used.
It should also be mentioned that the tabs T could be formed in the tab forming unit 4 by other means than stamping and punching operations.
It is also feasible to provide markings on a strip which has a coating, such as lacquer and/or paint. In this case, a lower laser power can be employed, since visible markings can be produced by selectively removing the coating from the strip surface.
The invention could also be used for laser engraving of other articles to be included in a can, for example the above-mentioned shell or the can body.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/176,013, filed Jan. 14, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2641998 | Donald | Jun 1953 | A |
2648278 | Neander | Aug 1953 | A |
3182994 | Huth | May 1965 | A |
3549733 | Caddell | Dec 1970 | A |
3626141 | Daly | Dec 1971 | A |
3692223 | Laigle et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3854647 | Mittendorf | Dec 1974 | A |
3898417 | Atkinson | Aug 1975 | A |
4304981 | Gappa | Dec 1981 | A |
4322016 | Barrash | Mar 1982 | A |
4323755 | Nierenberg | Apr 1982 | A |
4363179 | Ruemer, Jr. et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4375025 | Carlson | Feb 1983 | A |
4380129 | Barrash | Apr 1983 | A |
4405852 | Bononi | Sep 1983 | A |
4431124 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4459910 | Taube | Jul 1984 | A |
4476781 | Kubacki et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4517436 | Lawrence | May 1985 | A |
4564739 | Mattelin | Jan 1986 | A |
4635545 | Kubacki | Jan 1987 | A |
4675500 | Kunz | Jun 1987 | A |
4765532 | Uomoti et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4880137 | Wells | Nov 1989 | A |
4910739 | Sheng | Mar 1990 | A |
5202199 | Mitzutani et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206496 | Clement et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215864 | Laakmann | Jun 1993 | A |
5235454 | Iwasaki | Aug 1993 | A |
5248878 | Ihara | Sep 1993 | A |
5329090 | Woelki et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5465780 | Muntner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5552574 | Merlin | Sep 1996 | A |
5570384 | Nishida et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5578120 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593606 | Owen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5649363 | Rankin, VI | Jul 1997 | A |
5653900 | Clement et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660516 | Artrip | Aug 1997 | A |
5660747 | Drouillard et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5719372 | Togari et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5782024 | Pausch | Jul 1998 | A |
5817243 | Shaffer | Oct 1998 | A |
5854805 | Reid | Dec 1998 | A |
6002098 | Pircher et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6080958 | Miller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6373876 | Dulaney et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6479787 | Jendick | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489985 | Brodsky et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2168435 | Feb 1995 | CA |
2232871 | Mar 1997 | CA |
2052 512 | Apr 1972 | DE |
89 00 453.1 | Apr 1989 | DE |
38 22 097 | Jan 1990 | DE |
4106151 | Nov 1991 | DE |
4143339 | Mar 1993 | DE |
4339321 | Jun 1994 | DE |
4322252 | Jan 1995 | DE |
44 35 531 | Apr 1995 | DE |
43 38 774 | May 1995 | DE |
44 05 203 | Aug 1995 | DE |
196 39 619 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19607621 | Sep 1997 | DE |
298 16 109 | Nov 1998 | DE |
0 040 929 | Dec 1981 | EP |
0 085 484 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0482776 | Apr 1992 | EP |
208 175 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 618 037 | Oct 1994 | EP |
218563 | Jul 1987 | GB |
58-187091 | Nov 1983 | JP |
61086305 | May 1986 | JP |
8-53121 | Feb 1996 | JP |
WO 9304943 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9308541 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9504342 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9711288 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9853949 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9909853 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0003832 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60176013 | Jan 2000 | US |