Masonry walls are made of stone, block, or brick laid in stacked horizontal rows known as courses. To ensure that the courses are properly aligned vertically and horizontally in an intended location, a mason starts by setting up the bricks (or stones or other masonry blocks) at two corners of the masonry wall, sets a mason's line, a twisted or braided nylon line using pins.
Most masons use a line pin and nails to fasten line to the structure. The line pin is a steel pin about 4″ in length which tapers to a point. Better pins are made of tempered steel. The mason drives the line pin into mortar at the top of the course being laid. The mason's line is then pulled tight between the pins and tied.
Another method of fastening line is with line blocks, L-shaped blocks made of wood, plastic, or metal which have a slit in the center of the block. Wooden blocks are preferred because they grip the corner securely. The line is drawn tight through the slit in the block and held by tension against the finished corner. A similar block is used to fasten the line on the opposite end, thereby setting forth the orientation of the courses.
As masons know, a “trig” is relatively small prop or clip, usually made from light-gauge steel band material or the like, used to support or prop a guide string that marks a straight and level course by which to lay bricks or concrete blocks and the like. Concrete blocks or bricks are usually (but not always) laid in straight courses, one course on top of another, in progressive layers to build planar walls and the like. A mason typically sets up a guide string known as a “mason's line,” stretched level and tight across the span of the course, to aid him or her in aligning the blocks or bricks straight and level along the course. Trigs are used to support or prop these guide strings at several points along mid-span of the string because, especially for long courses, the trigs lift the sag out of the mason's line.
The quantity of patents claiming various forms of mason's line blocks or block alternatives bears witness to the necessity and utility of placement of mason's line anchors in the setting of masonry. Some of the notable examples are:
U.S. Pat. No. 2,948,065 issued to Simonic on Aug. 9, 1960 teaches a mason's line holding device which assists a mason in building a straight wall. The device, however, relies upon a nonslip line engaging pad to engage the brick for purposes of anchoring.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,119,186 issued to Stewart on Jan. 28, 1964 teaches a mason's line anchoring device formed as an inverted “U” to straddle a brick. Because of the pronounced thickness of the device necessary to serve as a platform for the pins of circular cross-section, the device according to Stewart could not be used by insertion into voids within the brick.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,461,565 issued to Harris on Aug. 19, 1969 teaches a multipurpose line stretcher for anchoring a mason's line. The line stretcher includes a wide body and two depending legs spaced to straddle a masonry unit or a portion thereof. An extension of the body serves as a tongue for attaching a mason's line.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,804 issued to Amos on Jul. 15, 1986 teaches a mason's line guide in two parts that, in cooperation, adjust as a clamp to the brick rather than simply overarching the brick.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,009,015 issued to Redl on Apr. 23, 1991 teaches a pair of flat plates with two rectangular sides providing corner pieces which fit over the top edge of bricks.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,263,779 issued to Wells on Sep. 4, 2007 comprises two identical holders fitted with stagger bolts and guide pins. Each holder further comprises a vee on the first end, the vee having a ramp on either side and a wedge in the base of the vee for removable string engagement. The string is pulled taught between the holders, thereby holding them in place on remotely positioned bricks to be used in aligning further bricklaying.
Each of the above-described devices, while performing the basic functions of positioning a mason's line, do not readily allow the mason to switch from laying brick to block without significant modification of the device, and each has further shortcomings in light of the variety of positions and configurations of brickwork needing to be suitably laid. Therefore, a need exists for improved mason's line anchors that will meet this wide variety of needs.
An anchoring device for a mason's line and method for its use includes a first and a second spaced apart parallel rail. Each rail includes a belaying nub to provide a protuberance upon which to tie the mason's line and a leg in opposed relation to the belaying nub. A bight spans between the first and the second rail. The bight joining each rail assembly at a junction between the belaying nub and the leg.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present invention functions as a line block. While it does not replace for line pins and trigs, where used, the use of the trigs is safer and faster. For purposes of this application, the preferred embodiment will be referred to as the “Brick Yoke” which is a nonlimiting embodiment of the novel masonry line block. It is not the inventor's intent to assert the Brick Yoke to be the sole embodiment of the invention.
The Brick Yoke 3 can be better understood with reference to
Advantageously, the two spaced apart belaying nubs 11 and bight 5 cooperating with the two line keepers 7 together work as a means of managing the length of a mason's line 1. For example, because the bight acts to keep the line keepers 7 fixed in their spatial relationship, mason's line 1 can be wrapped as on a spool around the brick yoke 3 at the line keepers 7. When in use, mason's line 1 is paid out from the line keepers 7 to any anchoring means, including but not limited to a second brick yoke 3. To take up any slack in the line 1, the line 1 may be advantageously wrapped about the belaying nub 11. Depending upon the desired alignment of the line 1 to the yoke 3, either of a line guide 15 (defined by the junction of the leg 9 and the bight 5) or the line groove 6 may be used to fix the line 1 in relation to a brick 51 or block (not shown) the yoke 3 straddles.
In this described preferred embodiment, the yoke 3 is formed of sheet metal suitably cut and subsequently formed to bend the wings 13 perpendicular to the planar sheet metal. In so forming the yoke 3, the legs 9, the nubs 11, and the bight 5 remain in the plane of the yoke 3, allowing them to engage a planar masonry surface. Additionally, as will be later described, the legs are suitable for insertion in unset mortar between bricks 51 or blocks (not shown), without, by act of insertion, moving one or another of the bricks 51 or blocks in relation to those remaining in the wall.
Standardized brick 51 sizes within the United States suggest an advantageous selection of dimensions. A nonlimiting embodiment of the yoke 3 shown in
Referring again to
A pair of yokes 3 are used in
Still another advantageous use of the yoke 3 is illustrated in
Yet another use of the yoke 3, very much like that illustrated in
Previously discussed applications have been shown in a context where there is adequate clearance on all sides to allow positioning of the yoke 3 in a variety of positions. In
Another use at the same corner is illustrated in
The yoke 3 is shown in the context of laying block 53 in
In
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, trigs may be used with the yokes to support the line over large spans. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2623290 | Kampel | Dec 1952 | A |
2893125 | Kampel | Jul 1959 | A |
2948065 | Simonic | Aug 1960 | A |
3119186 | Stewart | Jan 1964 | A |
3200500 | Stone | Aug 1965 | A |
3276129 | Andrews | Oct 1966 | A |
3408742 | Caprio et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3461565 | Harris | Aug 1969 | A |
3626434 | Miller | Dec 1971 | A |
4084321 | Huston | Apr 1978 | A |
4340089 | Freiherr von Arnim | Jul 1982 | A |
4458722 | Dahn | Jul 1984 | A |
4599804 | Amos | Jul 1986 | A |
4937946 | Steinhoff | Jul 1990 | A |
D314920 | Blazek | Feb 1991 | S |
5009015 | Redl | Apr 1991 | A |
5125162 | Prebeck | Jun 1992 | A |
D347798 | Tindoll | Jun 1994 | S |
5711081 | Zaccaria | Jan 1998 | A |
D445919 | Heavner | Jul 2001 | S |
6412184 | Heavner | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6842992 | Gitt | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7263779 | Wells | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7409771 | Bond | Aug 2008 | B2 |
D603063 | Arnold | Oct 2009 | S |
20070089312 | Wade | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090320306 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |