This invention relates to a masonry comprising layers of bricks or building stones and mortar joints, whereby at least one mortar joint is reinforced by a reinforcement strip, whereby said strip comprises at least two straight, continuous, substantially parallel, steel reinforcement wires, which are connected to each other by means of a steel wire connecting structure.
Such a masonry is already known from the U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,300,181, 2,929,238 and 3,183,628.
The correct application of adjacent layers of bricks, mortar joints and reinforcement strips in the mortar joints results in a masonry which can take up high tensile forces and shear forces compared with a masonry without reinforcement strips.
An important condition for obtaining a correct construction of such a masonry is the necessity of obtaining a good adherence between the reinforcement wires of the reinforcement strip and the mortar joints, as is clearly described in the U.S. Pat. No. 3,183,628. This good adherence, disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 3,183,628, is obtained by providing the two longitudinal side rods or steel reinforcement wires with a plurality of spaced bosses on the opposite sides of each of the side rods, whereby the bosses on one side of each rod are in staggered relationship to the bosses on the other side thereof. The disadvantage hereby is that an additional, expensive transformation or deformation of the side rods or reinforcement wires is necessary.
Another solution for obtaining a good adherence between the steel reinforcement wires of the reinforcement strip and the mortar joints is to take care that the reinforcement wires are completely embedded or surrounded by the mortar of the joint.
Therefore, the existing instructions for applying a known reinforcement strip, as disclosed in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,300,181 and 2,929,238, are as follows: apply firstly a mortar layer on the upper surface of the last layer of bricks, then apply the reinforcement strip or distribute mortar from the first applied layer and, finally, apply another mortar layer on the strip before the next layer of bricks is applied.
This is a rather cumbersome operation and it has been stated that masons at the building site are normally following another way of operation: applying firstly the reinforcement strip on the upper side of the last laid layer of bricks followed by applying a mortar layer before the next layer of bricks is applied. A disadvantage thereof is that the reinforcement wires are not completely embedded or have not sufficient adherence with the mortar of the joint to take up high tensile forces.
It is an object of the invention to provide a new type of masonry, whereby the reinforcement wires of the reinforcement strip are always sufficiently embedded in the mortar joint.
This object has been solved in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,629,393 B2 by providing the two longitudinal rods or reinforcement wires of the wire strip with a plurality of bent portions integrally formed and evenly spaced along the length thereof. These bent portions of each metal rod extend downwardly and/or upwardly from the plane formed by the two longitudinal rods or reinforcement wires.
A disadvantage of this solution according to the U.S. Pat. No. 6,629,393 B2 is, that the bent longitudinal rods or wires are not able to take up high tensile forces because the rods are weakened by these bent deformations and can only take up the applied tensile forces after the bent portions are sufficiently straightened. This straightening of the bent portions in the mortar joint will normally lead to fractures of the mortar joint.
It is therefore a further object of the invention to provide a new type of masonry, whereby the reinforcement wires of the wire strip are sufficiently embedded in the mortar joint, but without lowering the tensile strength of the longitudinal wires.
This object is solved in a known masonry by providing the wire connecting structure with protuberances protruding from the plane comprising said at least two straight reinforcement wires and forming in this way spacing elements which keep the at least two straight reinforcement wires at a specific distance from the layer of bricks below in order to guarantee the embedment of the reinforcing steel, when the mortar is applied after the laying of the reinforcing strips on the layer of brick below.
Preferably a mortar layer may also be provided above the reinforcing strip, i.e. between the reinforcing strip and the above layer of bricks.
It is clear, that in this way, the straight reinforcement wires are not weakened by any deformation operation and maintain their full tensile strength along their whole length.
Moreover, the reinforcement wires are completely embedded in the mortar joint.
Within the context of the present invention, the term “wire” is not limited to hard drawn wires with a circular cross-section. The term “wire” also covers non-drawn wires such as wires made of sheet material and profile wires with a non-round cross-section, e.g. a rectangular or square cross-section. The reinforcement wires must be able to take up tensile forces present in a mortar joint. In case the wire is made of sheet material, the cross-section is made greater than the cross-section of a comparable hard drawn wire in order to enable the required take up of tensile forces.
Another masonry according to the invention is characterised in that the wire connecting structure is bent to provide the protuberances protruding from the plane comprising said at least two straight reinforcement wires for forming the spacing elements.
A further embodiment of the masonry according to the invention is characterised in that the protuberances of the wire connecting structure are present at both sides of the plane comprising said at least two straight reinforcement wires.
Still a further embodiment of the masonry according to the invention is characterised in that the bent protuberances of the wire connecting structure are forming a crenel-form or sinusoidal-form.
In a preferable embodiment of the masonry according to the invention, the protuberances or spacing elements of the wire connecting structure are located as close as possible to the steel reinforcement wires, i.e. within a distance of maximum 10 cm from the connecting points between the wire connecting structure and the steel reinforcing wires, e.g. within a distance of maximum 8 cm, e.g. of maximum 5 cm, e.g. of maximum 3 cm. The reason is that the wire strips are also used to reinforce walls where the bricks have hollow spaces inside. In case the spacing elements are located in the middle of the wire connecting structure, the protuberances risk to fall inside the hollow spaces and to miss completely their spacing function.
The invention also relates to a reinforcement strip for manufacturing a masonry according to the invention comprising at least two straight, continuous, substantially parallel, steel reinforcement wires, which are welded to each other by means of a steel wire connecting structure, whereby the wire connecting structure is provided with protuberances protruding from the plane comprising said at least two straight reinforcement wires and forming in this way spacing elements for the reinforcement strip.
Another reinforcement strip according to the invention is characterised in, that the wire connecting structure is bent to provide the protuberances protruding from the plane comprising said at least two straight reinforcement wires for forming the spacing elements.
A further embodiment of a reinforcement strip according to the invention is characterised in, that the protuberances of the wire connecting structure are present at both sides of the plane comprising said at least two straight reinforcement wires.
Still a further embodiment of a reinforcement strip according to the invention is characterised in, that the bent protuberances of the wire connecting structure are forming a crenel-form or sinusoidal-form.
In a preferable embodiment of the steel strip according to the invention, the protuberances or spacing elements of the wire connecting structure are located as close as possible to the steel reinforcement wires, i.e. within a distance of maximum 10 cm from the connecting points between the wire connecting structure and the steel reinforcing wires, e.g. within a distance of maximum 8 cm, e.g. of maximum 5 cm, e.g. of maximum 3 cm. The reason is that the wire strips are also used to reinforce walls where the bricks have hollow spaces inside. In case the spacing elements are located in the middle of the wire connecting structure, the protuberances risk to fall inside the hollow spaces and to miss completely their spacing function.
It is to be noted, that steel wire strips comprising two straight wires and a wire connecting structure, whereby the steel wire connecting structure is provided with protuberances protruding from the plane comprising said two straight wires, are already known from the U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,190,999 and 4,305,239.
The U.S. Pat. No. 4,190,999 teaches downwardly projecting legs for fixing the steel wire strip in a correct position on the upper surface of the layer of bricks. These legs are not used as spacing elements, as taught in the present invention.
The U.S. Pat. No. 4,305,239 also discloses downwardly valleys in a cavity wall, whereby these valleys are used for guiding droplets in the cavity of the wall. Here again, these valleys are not used as spacing elements, as taught in the present invention.
The invention will now be further explained by means of some examples of masonries according to the invention and with reference to a number of figures.
a and
a,
The reinforcement strip, as shown in
The length of the continuous wires 5 is e.g. ranging between 2500 mm. and 3500 mm.; whereas the diameter of these wires is ranging between 4 and 6 mm. and the distance between the wires 5 is ranging between 30 mm to 280 mm, e.g. from 50 mm to 200 mm. The diameter of the zig-zag steel wire connecting structure 6 is ranging between 2 to 4 mm. The thickness of the mortar joint 3 is ranging between 8 to 15 mm. All the above given numbers are only mentioned for information purposes and do not limit the scope of the invention. It is clear, that all these mentioned dimensions are defined in first instance by the dimensions of the used bricks and the dimensions of the masonry wall to be built.
The wire connecting structure 6 is provided with protuberances 7 protruding from the plane comprising the two reinforcement wires 5. As can be seen in
However, in the embodiment of
The protuberances 7 having a certain depth (or height) of e.g. 1 to 6 mm, e.g. from 1 mm to 4 mm, e.g. a maximum depth of 3 mm or 2 mm, with respect to the plane formed by the upper part of the two reinforcement wires 5 and are forming in this way spacing elements or distance holders for the reinforcement strip 4. These spacing elements 7 define in this way a specific distance between the two layers 2 of the bricks or define in this way a certain thickness of the joint 3 between the two brick layers 2.
The protuberances 7 can have an additional deformation (not shown) in a plane parallel to the plane of the reinforcement wires 5. This additional deformation, although requiring yet another step of processing, has the advantage of providing a stable basis for the reinforcement strip on the previous layer of bricks.
As can be seen from the cross-section of the embodiment of the strip 4, shown in
A reinforcement strip 4 with both protuberances 7 upward and downward is very advantageous. First of all it can be placed on any side, there will always be a gap created both under and above the reinforcement wires 5. The function of the reinforcement strip is not to keep a fixed and constant distance between two layer of bricks, as disclosed in US-A-2004/182029, but to allow the reinforcement wires to be completely embedded in mortar. A layer of mortar is preferably provided above the reinforcement strip.
a shows a cross-section of another embodiment of a reinforcement strip 4 at a certain location and
Instead of point-welding the wire pieces above and under the reinforcement wires, a ladder type or reinforcement strip may also be made by butt-welding the wire pieces within the plane of the reinforcement wires.
a,
The embodiment of
The embodiment of
The embodiment of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08166420 | Oct 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/063123 | 10/8/2009 | WO | 00 | 4/12/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/043547 | 4/22/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2300181 | Spaight | Oct 1942 | A |
2929238 | Kaye | Mar 1960 | A |
3059380 | Holsman | Oct 1962 | A |
3183628 | Smith | May 1965 | A |
3347007 | Hale | Oct 1967 | A |
4190999 | Hampton | Mar 1980 | A |
4305239 | Geraghty | Dec 1981 | A |
6553737 | Berg | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6629393 | Pignataro | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6691486 | Durand | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6789365 | Hohmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7735292 | Massie | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8051619 | Hohmann, Jr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20030029123 | Pignataro | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040182029 | Berg | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1000665 | Dec 1996 | NL |
Entry |
---|
Third Party Submission dated Feb. 24, 2012, 5 pages. |
Third Party Submission date Jul. 11, 2012, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110283648 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |