1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to transducers, and more particularly to mass loaded acoustic dipole transducers capable of radiating and receiving acoustic energy at very low frequencies and also capable of withstanding high ambient pressures.
2. Background Discussion
Underwater sound dipole transducers can be designed to withstand high pressures by the use of a structurally enclosed housing which is operated so as to be set into translational motion by an enclosed attached transducer. These devices have been called “shaker box transducers”. In operation the housing (“box”) is moved back and forth in the medium alternately creating a pressure increase on one side and pressure decrease on the opposite side which results in a dipole beam pattern from the housing acting as a dual-sided piston radiator. The attached interior driving transduction device can be constructed from piezoelectric ceramic such as PZT. One such structural form of the PZT is referred to as the bender type which allows a large displacement at low frequencies. In this case the ends of the bender are attached to the housing and the center part of the bender moves laterally against the attachment causing the box to move. In previous designs the inertial reaction mass has been based only on the inherent dynamic mass of the bender structure itself.
One form of transducer is shown in my earlier U.S. Pat. No. 4,754,441 entitled “Directional Flextensional Transducer” issued on Jun. 28, 1988. This prior art patent illustrates an elliptical transducer that is driven into a dipole mode by a bending action and including an outer shell that supports a drive stack that may be comprised of piezoelectric or magnetostrictive material. However, in this transducer the stack does not use any central reaction mass.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved electro-mechanical transduction apparatus constructed and arranged so as to increase the motion of the housing and create greater acoustic intensity by attachment of a reactive inertial mass or masses to the center of the bender reducing the motion at that point and translating this motion to the edge mount on the box causing greater box or housing motion.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an improved acoustic transducer in which the resonance frequency and mechanical Q are lowered through the attachment of the aforementioned mass or masses.
To accomplish the foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention there is provided an improved electro-mechanical bender transduction apparatus that employs means for utilizing added mass to the electro-mechanical drivers in a way that creates greater motion of the enclosing attached housing causing greater piston like dipole motion and greater source strength.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention there is provided an electro-mechanical transduction apparatus that is comprised of: a housing; two piezoelectric bars or plates; a central member separating the two and attached at its ends to the housing and which acts as the acoustic radiating member and one or more masses that are attached to either the central member or the piezoelectric bars or plates. The two piezoelectric members may be wired for opposite extension creating a bending mode which through the edge mounting moves the housing relative to the attached central inertial masses. With an alternating electrical drive, the housing moves in a translational body motion creating a dipole acoustic radiator. Conversely the device produces a voltage on detecting the acoustic particle velocity of a wave in the medium and in this case acting as a vector hydrophone for an incoming acoustic wave with maximum output for the wave arriving in the direction of translational motion. The added masses produce greater acoustic intensity in the drive mode and greater output voltage in the receive mode, as well as a lower resonance frequency and lower mechanical Q.
In one preferred cylindrical embodiment of the invention two piezoelectric circular plates are attached to an inert central plate with mass loading at its center point. The outer edge of the central plate is preferably attached midway along the length of the cylindrical tube housing with end caps that act as the radiating pistons. The inert central plate is approximately the same thickness as the piezoelectric plates and the two piezoelectric plates are wired for bending operation. The mass loading is made as great as practical to produce the greatest motion at the pistons.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is also provided an electro-mechanical apparatus that comprises: a plurality of piezoelectric drivers; an enclosed housing attached to an intermediate support member; a plurality of pistons as part of or attached to the housing; and a plurality of masses attached to the intermediate member or the piezoelectric driver. The masses are preferably attached to the intermediate member.
As a reciprocal device the transducer may also be used as a receiver. The transducer may be used in a fluid medium, such as water, or in a gas, such as air. Although the embodiments illustrate means for acoustic radiation into a medium from pistons, alternatively, a mechanical load could replace the medium and in this case the transducer would be an actuator.
Numerous other objects, features and advantages of the invention should now become apparent upon a reading of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In accordance with the present invention, there is now described herein a number of different embodiments for practicing the present invention. There is provided a dipole transducer for obtaining increased source strength by means of the additional mass which causes greater translational motion of the radiating housing and also allows a lower resonant frequency and mechanical Q. A cross-sectional view with labeled parts for a cylindrical dipole transducer with additional mass is shown in
The inertial masses, 6 and 7, (typically a high density metal such as steel or tungsten) are attached to the center of the substrate 3, although they can also be attached to the piezoelectric discs 1 and 2. The discs 1 and 2 are provided with a through passage at their center so as to receive the respective masses 6 and 7 so that the masses can be attached to the substrate 3. The piezoelectric pieces 1 and 2 are energized by a voltage V at terminals 8 and 9 through wires connected to electrodes on the piezoelectric discs 1 and 2. The interior space 10 is typically, but not limited, to a gas such as air. The exterior is typically, but not limited to, a fluid such as water.
Once energized with voltage V at the terminals 8 and 9, the housing that is comprised of piezoelectric elements 4 and 5, moves along the direction of symmetry labeled as direction or axis A in
In the illustration shown in
Some simple equations for the housing displacement, resonance frequency and mechanical Q illustrate the advantage to using these inertial members of mass, M. With x the displacement of the housing along the axis of symmetry, with m the mass of the housing comprised of piezoelectric elements 4 and 5 and any additional radiation mass, with m′ the dynamic mass of the bender section comprised of piezoelectric elements 1 and 2 and substrate 3, with K the short circuit dynamic stiffness of the bender, then the force is expressed as F=NV generated by the piezoelectric bender, where N is the electromechanical transduction transformer ratio. At low frequencies, below resonance, it can then be shown that the axial displacement of the housing x=(F/K)/[1+m/(M+m′)]. Now for M>>m the displacement is x=F/K while for M=0, x=F/2K for a typical case of m′=m; and consequently the inclusion of the inertial masses can increase the displacement by a factor of two for large values of M. The resonance frequency may be written as fr=f0[1+m/(M+m′)]1/2 where f0 is the ideal resonance frequency when the mass M is very large. Thus for M>>m, fr=f0 while for M=0, fr=fo√2 for the typical case of m′=m; and consequently, the inclusion of the inertial masses can decrease the resonance frequency by the factor √2 for large values of M. Another advantage is the reduction in the mechanical Q which may be written as Qm=Q0[1+m/(M+m′)] where Q0 is the ideal Q for M>>m. Thus for M>>m, Qm=Q0 while for M=0, the Qm=2Q0 for the typical case of m′=m; and consequently, the inclusion of the inertial masses can decrease the mechanical Q by a factor 2 for large values of M.
The present invention is not limited to a cylinder and can take the form of a spherical structure as illustrated in
The transducer of the present invention can also take the form of a circular cylinder driven by segmented piezoelectric bender bars as shown in a schematic cross-sectional view in
In
Finite element models have been constructed to verify the performance of the transducer illustrated in
Having now described a limited number of embodiments of the present invention, it should now become apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous other embodiments and modifications thereof are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims. Examples of modification would be the use of other transduction devices or materials such as single crystal, magnetostriction or electrostriction material. The interior medium may be fluid. The exterior medium may be a mechanical load and in this case the transducer would be used as an actuator. As a result of reciprocity, the transduction device can be used as a receiver of sound as well as a transmitter of sound. As a receiver it produces an output voltage as a result of a pressure differential across the housing from an incoming acoustical wave or from a force producing an output voltage as an accelerometer.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3378814 | Butler | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3845333 | Holloway | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3924259 | Butler et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4326275 | Butler | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4438509 | Butler et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4443731 | Butler et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4604542 | Thompson | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4633119 | Thompson | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4642802 | Pozzo et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4654554 | Kishi | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4742499 | Butler | May 1988 | A |
| 4752918 | Boucher et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4754441 | Butler | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4811307 | Pohlenz et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4845688 | Butler | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4864548 | Butler | Sep 1989 | A |
| 5047683 | Butler et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5081391 | Owen | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5118981 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5184332 | Butler | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5742561 | Johnson | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5957851 | Hossack | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6465936 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6643222 | Osborn et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6654316 | Butler et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6734604 | Butler et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6950373 | Butler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 20020043897 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20050206275 | Radziemski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20070267940 | Wright | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080116764 | Heim | May 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080079331 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |