The present subject matter relates to mass spectrometry. More particularly, the present subject matter relates to mass spectrometers having segmented electrodes for improving transfer of higher order coded aperture patterns.
Mass spectrometers are commonly used in elemental analysis, offering quantitative sample anlaysis with the ability to resolve a broad range of atomic, molecular, and biological species. Spatially coded apertures analogous to those used optical spectroscopy have been applied to mass spectrometry, yielding gains in signal intensity of 10× and 4× for one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) coding techniques, respectively, using a simple 90-degree magnetic sector test setup with no corresponding losses in mass resolution. The increase in signal without loss in resolution breaks the throughput versus resolution tradeoff encountered in mass spectrometer miniaturization. In addition to increasing the performance of miniature instruments, aperture coding can improve the performance of laboratory instruments. Initial compatibility of simple codes with a miniature double-focusing Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrograph was demonstrated experimentally and with high fidelity particle tracing simulations and issues were identified with the electric sector that prevented use of more complex codes. Mattauch-Herzog mass analyzers can be found in a wide variety of instruments including fieldable mass spectrometers, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers, and secondary ion mass spectrometers.
While the Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrograph (MHMS) is double-focusing (focusing angle and energy) to first order for all masses, it does not perfectly focus ions emanating from points offset from the central beamline of its primary resolution-defining slit aperture. The traditional MHMS design is based on the paraxial approximation which assumes that ions travel close to the optical axis. However, spatially coded apertures extend the source of ions entering the spectrograph along a dimension perpendicular to the optical axis making the paraxial approximation used in many optical design tools (such as transfer matrix optics) insufficient for instruments using complex spatial codes.
In addition, high-order coded apertures are spatially expansive, requiring a wide electric sector gap to allow all ions to pass. As the electric sector gap increases, the electric field loses symmetry and becomes less uniform. There is a tradeoff between a wide gap that can allow a complex aperture but has a nonuniform field profile and a narrow gap with a uniform field profile that only allows a very simple aperture. Herzog shunts have been used to minimize the influence of sector faces on the electric field in areas near the electric sector. However, the ability of the Herzog shunts to limit the fringing field aberrations decreases with sector width. While the Herzog shunts keep the electric field from the external parts of the inner and outer electrodes contained, they do not effectively contain the electric field from the electric sector gap when the gap is large.
Despite the aforementioned improvements, there is still a desire to provide improved mass spectometers and techniques.
Disclosed herein are mass spectrometers having segmented electrodes and associated methods. According to an aspect, an apparatus or mass spectrometer includes an ion source configured to generate ions from a sample. The apparatus also includes a detector configured to detect a plurality of mass-to-charge ratios associated with the ions. Further, the apparatus includes segmented electrodes positioned between the ion source and the detector. The apparatus also includes a controller configured to selectively apply a voltage across the segmented electrodes for forming a predetermined electric field profile.
The foregoing aspects and other features of the present subject matter are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the present disclosure, reference will now be made to various embodiments and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended, such alteration and further modifications of the disclosure as illustrated herein, being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the disclosure relates.
Articles “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or to more than one (i.e. at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. By way of example, “an element” means at least one element and can include more than one element.
In this disclosure, “comprises,” “comprising,” “containing” and “having” and the like can have the meaning ascribed to them in U.S. Patent law and can mean “includes,” “including,” and the like; “consisting essentially of” or “consists essentially” likewise has the meaning ascribed in U.S. Patent law and the term is open-ended, allowing for the presence of more than that which is recited so long as basic or novel characteristics of that which is recited is not changed by the presence of more than that which is recited, but excludes prior art embodiments.
Ranges provided herein are understood to be shorthand for all of the values within the range. For example, a range of 1 to 50 is understood to include any number, combination of numbers, or sub-range from the group consisting 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50.
Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “about” is understood as within a range of normal tolerance in the art, for example within 2 standard deviations of the mean. The term “about” can be understood as within 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, or 0.01% of the stated value. Unless otherwise clear from context, all numerical values provided herein are modified by the term “about.”
Unless otherwise defined, all technical terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs.
As referred to herein, the term “mass spectrometer” or “mass spectrograph” refers to a device or equipment that utilizes an analytical chemistry technique that helps identify the amount and type of chemicals present in a sample by measuring the mass-to-charge ratio and abundance of gas-phase ions. A mass spectrum is a plot of the ion signal as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio. The spectra are used to determine the elemental or isotopic signature of a sample, the masses of particles and of molecules, and to elucidate the chemical structures of molecules. A mass spectrometer can separate and simultaneously focus ions, along a focal plane, of different mass/charge ratios that are diverging in direction and that have a variable velocity. With this equipment and a spatially sensitive ion detector simultaneous detection can be employed, which has been shown to improve precision and throughput.
As referred to herein, the term “mass spectrograph” is an instrument that separates and simultaneously focuses ions, along a focal plane, of different mass/charge ratios that are diverging in direction and that have a variable velocity. With these instruments and a spatially sensitive ion detector, simultaneous detection can be employed.
The mass spectrograph shown in
In accordance with embodiments, an electric sector is provided that breaks the tradeoff between wide and narrow sectors in Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrographs and enables stigmation of spatially coded apertures. The performance of this electric sector is compared to other electric sectors using finite element electric and magnetic field simulations that are not limited to paraxial cases. The electric sector disclosed herein introduces an array of segmented electrodes spanning the electric sector that prevents the loss of symmetry and field uniformity in other wide gap electric sectors. Further, the segmented electrode array disclosed herein enables placement of a nearby arbitrary electric field profile in the electric sector gap. To achieve maximum performance, a Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrograph using an electric sector disclosed herein can have its sectors adjusted in space and field magnitude via computerized optimization. Electrode arrays above and below the optical plane in charged particle systems are disclosed herein with sector position optimization. Described herein are four cases of electric sector and Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrograph-style mass spectrographs including a narrow gap electric sector, a wide gap electric sector, a wide gap electric sector with segmented electrodes and logarithmic field profile, and a wide gap electric sector with segmented electrodes and a linear field profile. These four cases have been simulated and compared for aperture imaging quality.
Table 1 below shows example geometric parameters of a Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrometer shown in
In experimentations, the four mass spectrograph geometries were designed and optimized via computer simulation. Utilizing high-fidelity finite-element generated electric and magnetic fields and a custom particle tracing routine, an accurate model of each mass spectrograph was developed. Through iterative simulations, the mass spectrograph design was optimized around its ability to transfer large spatially encoded arrays of ion beams with optimum uniformity of mass resolving power and minimum spatial distortion across the pattern. This was accomplished through computational optimization involving slight adjustments of the positions/rotation of components and the magnitudes of the applied electric fields.
The electric and magnetic fields of the mass spectrograph were calculated using the COMSOL 4.3b finite element multiphysics simulation platform. Simulation of the electric and magnetic fields was performed in three-dimensions (3D). The optical midplane of the 3D system's electric and magnetic fields was exported into regularly spaced 2D arrays. Three arrays were exported: the x- and y-components of the electric field, and the z-component of the magnetic field (Ex, Ey, and Bz). The coordinate system used is shown by the axes in
Electric and magnetic fields were exported from COMSOL to a custom C#particle tracer program for fast iterations of electric field strengths and sector positions/rotations needed for optimization of sector geometries. Further, the computational speed of our custom particle tracing allowed for rapid evaluation of test geometries. Particle tracing was handled with time steps of 1 picosecond and bilinear interpolation of the 2D midplane fields exported from the COMSOL simulations.
The particle tracing program had two main tasks. First, it generated large numbers of ions with realistic distributions of energy and direction vectors. Second, it passed these ions through the simulated fields of the system with high precision. This simulation approach allows for high speed simulations with very small time steps and is therefore able to accurately account for fringing fields. The C# code evaluated more than 106 time steps along each ion's trajectory. The effects of these fringing fields are of critical importance in miniaturized systems due to the large fraction of the ions' total flight path that are affected by fringing fields.
The COMSOL-C# combined approach allowed for fast simulation of particle trajectories substantially faster than could have done. In addition to calculation speed, the C#tracer allows for the simulation of highly asymmetric geometries with high fidelity. This particle tracing fidelity is 100× higher than the best that could be achieved using the COMSOL particle tracing module on the same workstation (1× Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 @ 3.50 GHz; 32 GB RAM) and produced particle trajectories with many fewer discretization errors based on the resulting histogram patterns.
Simulations according to the present subject matter used ions representative of a typical ion source as follows. Particle tracing figures and optimization used 20 atomic mass unit (AMU) and 200 AMU ions with initial positions of −4, −2, 0, 2, and 4 mm relative to ion source center; angles of −0.01, −0.005, 0, 0.005, and 0.01 radians relative to the beamline; and energies of 798, 799, 800, 801, 802 eV (2 masses*5 positions*5 angles*5 energies=250 ions total). Histograms used 200 AMU ions with positions along the open portions of a randomly generated coded aperture pattern with 103 positions (open or closed) with 100 micron feature size shown in Histogram (e) of
The electric sectors disclosed herein and shown in
Once fields were exported from COMSOL and ion source properties determined, ion source position, magnet position and rotation, and electric sector magnitude were varied. The C# particle tracer calculated ion trajectories and the positions of the particles on the detector. For optimization, 250 particles were simulated: 125 for a mass of 20 AMU and 125 for a mass of 200 AMU as described above. For each position on the aperture, it is desired that the 25 ions (five angles and five energies) hit the sensor at the same place. The 25 ions do not hit exactly the same place, but instead impact in a cluster. The size of this cluster is calculated ten times (five positions on the aperture and two masses). These sizes are then averaged, giving a figure of merit for the mass spectrograph. If any of the 250 ions do not strike the sensor, the design was rejected. The Mathematica function takes spectrograph parameters and returns a single number representing focus; this allows optimization to occur.
To illustrate the improvements provided by the present disclosure, four simulated cases of electric sector designs integrated into mass spectrographs are presented. Each case is based upon or modified from the MHMS used by Russell et. al8 and details of their configurations are presented Table 1. Case 1 is a traditional MHMS geometry with a narrow gap electric sector. Case 2 is a MHMS geometry with a wider electric sector gap but is otherwise identical to the first case. Case 3 has an electric sector like that shown in
Table 2 below shows geometric and field parameters for the four cases. Cases 1 and 2 use traditional MHMS sector and source positions. Case 3 and 4 are optimized for focus. It should be noted that the L2 distance is limited to 15 mm by the optimizer, and some parameters have not been optimized.
Case 1 represents a traditional MHMS mass spectrometer. Its electric sector has a 5 mm gap, large height, and no electrode arrays. Sector positions are that for traditional MHMS. Table 2 provides additional geometric parameters of Case 1. When attempting to pass the encoded ion beam pattern from the order 103 aperture shown in Histogram (e), the narrow electric sector only allows a small portion of the aperture to pass. These results are presented in Histogram (a). The central portion of the aperture image is well-imaged which matches with the way this instrument was typically used for near central axis beams. As it moves further from the center beam line, there is significant distortion of the aperture image and Case 1 does not allow all the ions through.
Case 2 is the same as case 1, but with a 4× wider electric sector gap of 20 mm. Sector positions are that for traditional MHMS and are presented in Table 2. Histogram (b) shows a comparison of the coded aperture and the image on the detector. In this case, due to the wide electric sector, more of the ions are able to pass through the electric sector. However, due to the poor symmetry and uniformity of the field the image of the aperture is distorted. It is believed that a combination of fringing fields close to the electric sector, field non-uniformity, and the potential along the centerline being nonzero in the electric sector are responsible for the reduced performance of Case 1 compared to later cases.
In addition to the non-optimized wide gap sector presented in case 2, ions were run through an unoptimized Case 3 geometry. Case 3 is very similar to case 2, but employs the segmented electrodes, shorter electric sector height, and optimization of sector positions/magnet rotation and electric field magnitude. Since unoptimized Case 3's fields are designed to be a representation of Case 2's fields in a smaller form factor, they yield very similar results. Therefore, the results of this unoptimized case 3 are not substantially different than the optimized case 3 geometry presented below and are not presented in figures to avoid redundancy.
Case 3 has the same electric sector width as Case 2, but employs the segmented electrodes and a shorter height. Its electric sector has 20 mm gap, 5-6 mm height, and electrode arrays with electric potentials according to equation (1) applied, with additional parameters as shown in Table 2.
Case 4 utilizes the same segmented electrode electric sector as case 3, but with a linear potential profile applied to the segmented electrodes. The electric sector has 20 mm gap, 5-6 mm height, and electrode arrays with linear electric potentials applied. Sector positions and electric field strength are optimized for high order coded apertures and Table 2 provides additional detailed parameters.
The segmented electrodes presented herein have shown the capability of not only reducing the volume footprint of the electric sector, but also the capability of producing non-traditional and somewhat arbitrary field profiles across a gap. This capability can be used to provide an optimal field which can correct for beam aberrations and/or stigmate pattern transfer in a beam imaging system. For example, by applying the linearly varying potential profile of Case 4 and performing a geometric and potential optimization to maximize focus, a mass spectrograph configuration with stigmated coded aperture pattern transfer has been achieved.
Each of the four electric sector configurations is shown in
Another problem with wide-gap sectors is that to provide the fields depicted in
where ΔV is the voltage between the inner and outer electrodes of the electric sector, r is radial coordinate in the electric sector, RE is the radius of the optical axis in the electric sector, and eGap is the gap between the inner and outer electrodes of the electric sector. For narrow gaps, the potential profile of equation (1) matches closely to a linear profile, as shown
A comprehensive comparison of the results from the geometries of Cases 1-4 is presented in
A more detailed version of the insets of
Further investigation of this performance increase produces the curves as presented
Simulations and optimization of a novel stigmated double focusing mass spectrograph geometry that allows for higher order 1D spatially coded aperture patterns have been presented along with simulations of a traditional Mattauch-Herzog mass spectrograph (MHMS) it was based upon for comparison. The modifications include a novel electric sector design that enables image stigmation and aberration correction of spatially encoded beams, and an optimized geometric configuration of the above resulting in simulated pattern transfer of an order-103 aperture. This result in an over 50× increase in signal intensity when using an order-103 coded aperture as well as an increase in ultimate mass resolving power by a factor of 1.8× when operated as a single slit instrument. The most notable modification was the application of a linear electric field profile provided by a segmented electric sector. The described electric sector has a very small form factor and can be made simply and inexpensively. This stigmated double focusing mass spectrograph design will allow increased miniaturization of magnetic sector mass spectrographs, expanding their application. The proposed electric sector and mass spectrograph design can also be used to increase the resolution of laboratory-sized instruments.
By using a segmented electric sector with a linearly varying electric field in a Mattauch Herzog style mass spectrograph in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, a large spatially coded aperture patterns of ions may be passed through a mass spectrograph and may produce a segmented image of the higher order coded apertures simultaneously across a wide mass range. Coded aperatures of this size in this spectrometer can enable improved mass spectrometer signal intensity. For example, the electric sector of the mass spectrograph shown in
Referring to
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, “caps” may be placed on the top and bottom of an electric sector of a mass spectrometer or mass spectrograph and includes segmented electrodes. The segmented electrodes may be patterned across the caps. Further, different potentials can be applied to each electrode segment to achieve new field profiles for correcting aberrations.
Using segmented electrodes to produce an electric field that varies linearly across the span of the sector, as shown in
Using segmented electrodes in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, new lenses can be produced, such as a beam splitting electric sector. Such segmented electric sectors can not only allow large coded beams to pass through theses geometries, but also reduce the aberrations that would be seen by smaller or single beam systems they are incorporated into. Using the segmented electrodes, wide gap beam splitters can be provided that behave as if the branching path does not exist.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, lenses as described herein may be able to stigmate large coded beams from higher order coded aperture patterns. This lens design integrated into a double focusing Mattauch-Herzog style mass spectrometer provides excellent performance increases as demonstrated in
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, the entrance and exit angles of electric sectors can be changed using the segmented electrode electric sectors. As an example, this may be used in magnetic sector design. Changing entrance and exit angles for electric sectors can have a dramatic impact on their lensing properties and can enable new classes of double focusing geometries to be discovered and built. Segmented electrodes can be used to change the entrance and exit face angles of electric sectors similar to what is done with magnetic sector lenses.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, electric sectors can be created with gaps that expand or contract across their length. These sectors can be used for beams or patterned beams that expand or condense greatly from the entrance to the exit of the electric sector.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, a double focusing mass spectrograph can be implemented. This mass spectrograph can perform snapshot analysis across the entire mass range for either positive or negative ions using permanent magnets (this means very low power consumption). Split sectors segmented electrodes, and tilted entrance and exit angle electric sectors can be used to produce this geometry. This configuration can be very useful if advanced ion imaging detectors are the cost limiting factor in instrument design, because the same detector is used for both positive and negative beam.
Electrodes as described herein may be individually controlled by a suitable controller, such as a computing device. For example, the electrodes may be electrically connected to the controller and the controller may selectively apply voltage across the electrodes.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, the apparatus described herein may be configured to separate particle beams of uniform mass to charge ratio, such as electron or proton beams) by energy rather than mass to charge ratio.
The various techniques described herein may be implemented with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the disclosed embodiments, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computer will generally include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device and at least one output device. One or more programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.
The described methods and apparatus may also be embodied in the form of program code that is transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via any other form of transmission, wherein, when the program code is received and loaded into and executed by a machine, such as an EPROM, a gate array, a programmable logic device (PLD), a client computer, a video recorder or the like, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. When implemented on a general-purpose processor, the program code combines with the processor to provide a unique apparatus that operates to perform the processing of the presently disclosed subject matter.
Features from one embodiment or aspect may be combined with features from any other embodiment or aspect in any appropriate combination. For example, any individual or collective features of method aspects or embodiments may be applied to apparatus, system, product, or component aspects of embodiments and vice versa.
One skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the present subject matter is well adapted to carry out the objects and obtain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as those inherent therein. The present examples along with the methods described herein are presently representative of various embodiments, are exemplary, and are not intended as limitations on the scope of the present subject matter. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art which are encompassed within the spirit of the present subject matter as defined by the scope of the claims.
This is a 371 national stage patent application, which claims priority to PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/059496, filed Oct. 28, 2016, and titled MASS SPECTROMETERS HAVING SEGMENTED ELECTRODES AND ASSOCIATED METHODS, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/247,604, filed Oct. 28, 2015, and titled MASS SPECTROMETERS HAVING SEGMENTED ELECTRODES AND ASSOCIATED METHODS; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
This invention was made with government support under grant number HSHQDC-11-C-00082, awarded by the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/059496 | 10/28/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/075470 | 5/4/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3527938 | Delaney | Sep 1970 | A |
3622781 | Liebl | Nov 1971 | A |
3745343 | Halliday | Jul 1973 | A |
3949221 | Liebl | Apr 1976 | A |
3967116 | Geerk | Jun 1976 | A |
4524275 | Cottrell et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4638160 | Slodzian | Jan 1987 | A |
4672204 | Slodzian | Jun 1987 | A |
4912326 | Naito | Mar 1990 | A |
4945236 | Mogami | Jul 1990 | A |
4952803 | Matsuda | Aug 1990 | A |
5118939 | Ishihara | Jun 1992 | A |
5194732 | Bateman | Mar 1993 | A |
5313061 | Drew | May 1994 | A |
6501074 | Gentry | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6614021 | Kalinitchenko | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6900431 | Belov et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6989533 | Bellec et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7399957 | Parker | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7728287 | Felton | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7858934 | Belford et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20060011829 | Scheidemann | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080087814 | Loucks | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080315086 | Kovtoun | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090090853 | Schoen | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090218486 | Whitehouse et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242748 | Li | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110192969 | Verentchikov | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120286150 | Muntean | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130168547 | Nishiguchi et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140117248 | Kahen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140312219 | Ardelt | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140353487 | Giles | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/059496 dated Feb. 21, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/059496 dated May 1, 2018 (seven (7) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190057854 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62247604 | Oct 2015 | US |