Patent Application
20170082635
The present application is being filed along with a Sequence Listing as an ASCII text file via EFS-Web. The Sequence Listing is provided as a file entitled UCI012001P1SEQLIST.txt, created and last saved on Dec. 5, 2016, which is 88,797 bytes in size. The information in the electronic format of the Sequence Listing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety in accordance with 35 U.S.C. §1.52(e).
The disclosure relates generally to cross-linking agents and methods of using cross-linking agents to facilitate structural analysis of proteins and protein complexes. In some embodiments, the disclosure relates to MS-cleavable cross-linking agents that are diester derivatives of 3,3′-sulfinylbispropanoic acid and methods of using MS-cleavable cross-linking agents that are diester derivatives of 3,3′-sulfinylbispropanoic acid to facilitate structural analysis of proteins and protein complexes.
In some embodiments, the disclosure relates to azide-tagged, acid-cleavable disuccinimidyl-bisulfoxide (azide-A-DSBSO) cross-linking agent and methods of using azide-A-DSBSO to facilitate structural analysis of proteins and protein complexes.
In some embodiments, the disclosure relates to alkyne-tagged, acid-cleavable disuccinimidyl-bisulfoxide (alkyne-A-DSBSO) cross-linking agent and methods of using alkyne-A-DSBSO to facilitate structural analysis of proteins and protein complexes.
Knowledge of elaborate structures of protein complexes is fundamental for understanding their functions and regulations. Although cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) has been presented as a feasible strategy for structural elucidation of large multi-subunit protein complexes, this method has proven challenging due to technical difficulties in unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides and determination of cross-linked sites by MS analysis.
Despite the availability of multiple types of MS-cleavable cross-linkers, most of the applications have been limited to the study of model peptides and single proteins. Additionally, complicated synthesis and fragmentation patterns have impeded most of the known MS-cleavable cross-linkers from wide adaptation by the community.
In some embodiments, an MS-cleavable cross-linker for mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein, inter-protein interactions in a protein complex or a combination thereof is provided. In some embodiments, the MS-cleavable cross-linker comprises at least one amine-reactive N-hydroxysuccinimdyl (NHS) ester group and at least one collision-induced dissociation (CID) cleavable bond.
In some embodiments of the MS-cleavable cross-linker, the amine-reactive NHS ester group is designed to react with a lysine side chain in a peptide or a protein. In some embodiments of the MS-cleavable cross-linker, the at least one CID cleavable bond is a sulfoxide bond. In some embodiments of the MS-cleavable cross-linker, the MS-cleavable cross-linker is DSSO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments, the MS-cleavable cross-linker additionally comprises at least one enrichment handle and at least one acid cleavage site, wherein the MS-cleavable cross-linker is membrane permeable.
In some embodiments of the MS-cleavable cross-linker, the at least one enrichment handle comprises a functional group, wherein the functional group is an azide functional group or an alkyne functional group, and wherein the functional group is designed for a click reaction with strained alkynes or a CuAAC reaction.
In some embodiments of the MS-cleavable cross-linker, the acid cleavable site is an acid labile acetal bond, wherein the acid labile acetal bond is designed to be cleaved under aqueous acidic conditions.
In some embodiments, wherein the MS-cleavable cross-linker is azide-A-DSBDO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments, the MS-cleavable cross-linker is alkyne-A-DSBDO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments, a method for synthesis of an MS-cleavable cross-linker for mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein, inter-protein interactions in a protein complex or a combination thereof is provided.
In some embodiments, the method comprises the steps of:
(i) providing 3,3′-thiodipropionic acid;
(ii) deriving bis(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) 3,3′-thiodipropionate from the compound of step (i); and
(iii) deriving DSSO from the compound of step (ii).
In some embodiments, a method for synthesis of an MS-cleavable cross-linker for mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein, inter-protein interactions in a protein complex or a combination thereof is provided.
In some embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
(i) providing 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol;
(ii) deriving (1,5-dioxaspiro[5.5]undecane-3,3-diyl)dimethanol from the compound of step (i);
(iii) deriving (1,5-dioxaspiro[5.5]undecane-3,3-diyl)bis(methylene) dimethanesulfonate from the compound of step (ii);
(iv) deriving S,S′-((1,5-dioxaspiro[5.5]undecane-3,3-diyl)bis(methylene)) diethanethioate from the compound of step (iii);
(v) deriving dimethyl 3,3′-(((1,5-dioxaspiro[5.5]undecane-3,3-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (iv);
(vi) deriving dimethyl 3,3′-((2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (v);
(vii) deriving dimethyl 3,3′-(((2-(3-azidopropyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (vi);
(viii) deriving 3,3′-(((2-(3-azidopropyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionic acid from the compound of step (vii);
(ix) deriving bis(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) 3,3′-(((2-(3-azidopropyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (viii);
(x) deriving azide-A-DSBDO from the compound of step (ix).
In some embodiments, a method for synthesis of an MS-cleavable cross-linker for mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein, inter-protein interactions in a protein complex or a combination thereof is provided.
In some embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
(i) providing 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)propane-1,3-diol and methyl 3-mercaptopropanoate;
(ii) deriving dimethyl 3,3′-((2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compounds of step (i);
(iii) deriving dimethyl 3,3′-(((2-(3-azidopropyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (ii);
(iv) deriving bis(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) 3,3′-(((2-(3-azidopropyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (iii); and
(v) deriving azide-A-DSBDO from the compound of step (iv).
In some embodiments, a method for synthesis of an MS-cleavable cross-linker for mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein, inter-protein interactions in a protein complex or a combination thereof is provided.
In some embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
(i) providing dimethyl 3,3′-((2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate;
(ii) deriving dimethyl 3,3′-(((2-(but-3-yn-1-yl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionate from the compound of step (i);
(iii) deriving bis(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) 3,3′-(((2-(but-3-yn-1-yl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxane-5,5-diyl)bis(methylene))bis(sulfanediyl))dipropionatefrom the compound of step (ii); and
(iv) deriving alkyne-A-DSBDO from the compound of step (iii).
In some embodiments, a method for mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein, inter-protein interactions in a protein complex or a combination thereof is provided. In some embodiment, the method comprises the steps of providing an MS-cleavable cross-linker, wherein the MS-cleavable cross-linker comprises at least one amine-reactive N-hydroxysuccinimdyl (NHS) ester group and at least one collision-induced dissociation (CID) cleavable bond, forming a cross-linked protein or protein complex by cross-linking the protein or the protein complex with the MS-cleavable cross-linker, forming one or more peptide fragments that are chemically bound to the MS-cleavable cross-linker by digesting the cross-linked protein or protein complex with an enzyme, and identifying the one or more peptide fragments using tandem mass spectrometry (MSn), thereby mapping intra-protein interactions in a protein and inter-protein interactions in a protein complex.
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is a derivative of a compound of structure:
wherein X is selected from the group consisting of:
wherein R is H, methyl or ethyl.
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is DSSO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent additionally comprises at least one enrichment handle, and at least one acid cleavage site, wherein the MS-cleavable cross-linker is membrane permeable.
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is azide-A-DSBSO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is alkyne-A-DSBSO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments of the method, the at least one enrichment handle comprises a functional group for an enrichment strategy, wherein the functional group is an azide functional group or an alkyne functional group, and wherein the functional group is designed for a click reaction with strained alkynes or a CuAAC reaction.
In some embodiments of the method, the enrichment strategy is an affinity purification wherein the affinity purification comprises direct coupling with alkyne or azide functionalized beads or linking with one or more common affinity ligands such as biotin.
In some embodiments of the method, the acid cleavable site is an acid labile acetal bond, wherein the acid labile acetal bond is designed to be cleaved under aqueous acidic conditions for selective elution from an affinity column.
In some embodiments, a method for cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) for identifying one or more cross-linked peptides is provided. In some embodiments, the method comprises performing cross-linking with an MS-cleavable cross-linker to obtain one or more cross-linked proteins, wherein the MS-cleavable cross-linker comprises at least one amine-reactive N-hydroxysuccinimdyl (NHS) ester group, and at least one collision-induced dissociation (CID) cleavable bond, digesting the one or more cross-linked proteins with trypsin to obtain one or more cross-linked peptides, performing a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSn) analysis on the one or more cross-linked peptides, wherein the LC-MSn analysis comprises detecting the one or more cross-linked peptides by MS 1 analysis, selecting the one or more cross-linked peptides detected by MS1 for MS2 analysis, selectively fragmenting the at least one CID cleavable bond and separating the one or more cross-linked peptides during MS2 analysis, sequencing the one or more cross-linked peptides separated during MS2 analysis by MS3 analysis, and integrating data obtained during MS1, MS2 and MS3 analyses to identify the one or more cross-linked peptides.
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is DSSO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent additionally comprises at least one enrichment handle and at least one acid cleavage site, wherein the MS-cleavable cross-linker is membrane permeable.
In some embodiments of the method, the MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is azide-A-DSBSO, comprising the structure:
In some embodiments of the method, MS-cleavable cross-linking agent is alkyne-A-DSBSO, comprising the structure:
TABLE 1—Summary of DSSO-interlinked peptides of cytochrome c identified by LC MSn.
TABLE 2—Summary of DSSO-interlinked peptides of the yeast 20 S proteasome complex identified by LC MSn.
TABLE 3—Summary of DSSO cross-linked peptides—DSSO dead-end, intra-linked and multilinked peptides—of cytochrome c by LC MSn.
TABLE 4—Summary of DSSO cross-linked peptides of ubiquitin by LC
MSn.
TABLE 5—Summary of DSSO inter-linked and dead-end peptides of the yeast 20S proteasome complex by LC MSn.
TABLE 6—Peptide sequences with their corresponding SEQ ID NOs.
TABLE 7—Summary of unique inter-linked peptides identified from azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked cytochrome C.
TABLE 8—Summary of proteins identified from in vivo cross-linked human 293 cells after enrichment.
TABLE 9—GO analysis of the identified azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked proteins.
TABLE 10—Detailed report of inter-linked peptides identified from in vivo cross-linked human 293 cells.
TABLE 11—Summary of identified inter-subunit inter-links of in vivo cross-linked proteasome complexes.
TABLE 12—Detailed summary of identified inter-subunit inter-linked peptides of in vivo cross-linked proteasome complexes.
‡They were identified from different fragment pair ions by MS3.
Proteins form stable and dynamic multi-subunit complexes under different physiological conditions to maintain cell viability and normal cell homeostasis. Detailed knowledge of protein interactions and protein complex structures is fundamental to understanding how individual proteins function within a complex and how the complex functions as a whole. However, structural elucidation of large multi-subunit protein complexes has been difficult due to lack of technologies which can effectively handle their dynamic and heterogeneous nature. Traditional methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis and X-ray crystallography can yield detailed information on protein structures. However, NMR spectroscopy requires large quantities of pure protein in a specific solvent while X-ray crystallography is often limited by the crystallization process.
In recent years, chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) has become a powerful method for studying protein interactions. See for example the disclosures of Sinz, A. (2003) Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry for Mapping Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins and Protein Complexes. J Mass Spectrom. 38, 1225-1237; Sinz, A. (2006) Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry to Map Three-Dimensional Protein Structures and Protein-Protein Interactions. Mass Spectrom Rev 25, 663-682; and Leitner, A., Walzthoeni, T., Kahraman, A., Herzog, F., Rinner, O., Beck, M., and Aebersold, R. (2010) Probing Native Protein Structures by Chemical Cross-Linking, Mass Spectrometry and Bioinformatics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9, 1634-1649.
Chemical cross-linking stabilizes protein interactions through the formation of covalent bonds and allows the detection of stable, weak and/or transient protein-protein interactions in native cells or tissues See for example the disclosures of Sinz, A. (2010) Investigation of Protein-Protein Interactions in Living Cells by Chemical Cros slinking and Mass Spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 397, 3433-3440; Vasilescu, J., Guo, X., and Kast, J. (2004) Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions Using in Vivo Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry. Proteomics 4, 3845-3854; Guerrero, C., Tagwerker, C., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2006) An Integrated Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Approach: Quantitative Analysis of Tandem Affinity-Purified in Vivo Cross-Linked Protein Complexes (Qtax) to Decipher the 26 S Proteasome-Interacting Network. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 366-378; Tagwerker, C., Flick, K., Cui, M., Guerrero, C., Dou, Y., Auer, B., Baldi, P., Huang, L., and Kaiser, P. (2006) A Tandem Affinity Tag for Two-Step Purification under Fully Denaturing Conditions: Application in Ubiquitin Profiling and Protein Complex Identification Combined with in Vivocross-Linking. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 737-748; Guerrero, C., Milenkovic, T., Przulj, N., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2008) Characterization of the Proteasome Interaction Network Using a Qtax-Based Tag-Team Strategy and Protein Interaction Network Analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 13333-13338; and Kaake, R. M., Milenkovic, T., Przulj, N., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2010) Characterization of Cell Cycle Specific Protein Interaction Networks of the Yeast 26s Proteasome Complex by the Qtax Strategy. J Proteome Res 9, 2016-2019.
In addition to capturing protein interacting partners, many studies have shown that chemical cross-linking can yield low-resolution structural information about the constraints within a molecule. See for example the disclosures of Sinz, A. (2006) Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry to Map Three-Dimensional Protein Structures and Protein-Protein Interactions. Mass Spectrom Rev 25, 663-682; Leitner, A., Walzthoeni, T., Kahraman, A., Herzog, F., Rinner, O., Beck, M., and Aebersold, R. (2010) Probing Native Protein Structures by Chemical Cross-Linking, Mass Spectrometry and Bioinformatics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9, 1634-1649; and Back, J. W., de Jong, L., Muijsers, A. O., and de Koster, C. G. (2003) Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry for Protein Structural Modeling. J Mol Biol. 331, 303-313, or protein complex, as disclosed in Rappsilber, J., Siniossoglou, S., Hurt, E. C., and Mann, M. (2000) A Generic Strategy to Analyze the Spatial Organization of Multi-Protein Complexes by Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem. 72, 267-275; Maiolica, A., Cittaro, D., Borsotti, D., Sennels, L., Ciferri, C., Tarricone, C., Musacchio, A., and Rappsilber, J. (2007) Structural Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes by Cross-Linking, Mass Spectrometry, and Database Searching. Mol Cell Proteomics 6, 2200-2211; and Chen, Z. A., Jawhari, A., Fischer, L., Buchen, C., Tahir, S., Kamenski, T., Rasmussen, M., Lariviere, L., Bukowski-Wills, J. C., Nilges, M., Cramer, P., and Rappsilber, J. (2010) Architecture of the Rna Polymerase Ii-Tfiif Complex Revealed by Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry. Embo J 29, 717-726.
The application of chemical cross-linking, enzymatic digestion, and subsequent mass spectrometric and computational analysis for the elucidation of three dimensional protein structures offers distinct advantages over traditional methods due to its speed, sensitivity, and versatility. Identification of cross-linked peptides provides distance constraints that aid in constructing the structural topology of proteins and/or protein complexes.
Although this approach has been successful, effective detection and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides as well as unambiguous assignment of cross-linked sites remain extremely challenging due to their low abundance and complicated fragmentation behavior in MS analysis. See for the example the disclosures of Sinz, A. (2006) Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry to Map Three-Dimensional Protein Structures and Protein-Protein Interactions. Mass Spectrom Rev 25, 663-682; Leitner, A., Walzthoeni, T., Kahraman, A., Herzog, F., Rinner, O., Beck, M., and Aebersold, R. (2010) Probing Native Protein Structures by Chemical Cross-Linking, Mass Spectrometry and Bioinformatics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9, 1634-1649; Back, J. W., de Jong, L., Muijsers, A. O., and de Koster, C. G. (2003) Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry for Protein Structural Modeling. J Mol Biol. 331, 303-313; and Schilling, B., Row, R. H., Gibson, B. W., Guo, X., and Young, M. M. (2003) Ms2assign, Automated Assignment and Nomenclature of Tandem Mass Spectra of Chemically Crosslinked Peptides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 14, 834-850.
Therefore, new reagents and methods are urgently needed to allow unambiguous identification of cross-linked products and to improve the speed and accuracy of data analysis to facilitate its application in structural elucidation of large protein complexes.
A number of approaches have been developed to facilitate MS detection of low abundance cross-linked peptides from complex mixtures. These include selective enrichment using affinity purification with biotinylated cross-linkers, for example, as described in Trester-Zedlitz, M., Kamada, K., Burley, S. K., Fenyo, D., Chait, B. T., and Muir, T. W. (2003) A Modular Cross-Linking Approach for Exploring Protein Interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 125, 2416-2425; Tang, X., Munske, G. R., Siems, W. F., and Bruce, J. E. (2005) Mass Spectrometry Identifiable Cross-Linking Strategy for Studying Protein-Protein Interactions. Anal Chem 77, 311-318; and Chu, F., Mahrus, S., Craik, C. S., and Burlingame, A. L. (2006) Isotope-Coded and Affinity-Tagged Cross-Linking (Icatxl): An Efficient Strategy to Probe Protein Interaction Surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 128, 10362-10363, and click chemistry with alkyne-tagged (Chowdhury, S. M., Du, X., Tolic, N., Wu, S., Moore, R. J., Mayer, M. U., Smith, R. D., and Adkins, J. N. (2009) Identification of Cross-Linked Peptides after Click-Based Enrichment Using Sequential Collision-Induced Dissociation and Electron Transfer Dissociation Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 81, 5524-5532) or azide tagged cross-linkers, see for example Kasper, P. T., Back, J. W., Vitale, M., Hartog, A. F., Roseboom, W., de Koning, L. J., van Maarseveen, J. H., Muijsers, A. O., de Koster, C. G., and de Jong, L. (2007) An Aptly Positioned Azido Group in the Spacer of a Protein Cross-Linker for Facile Mapping of Lysines in Close Proximity. Chembiochem 8, 1281-1292; and Nessen, M. A., Kramer, G., Back, J., Baskin, J. M., Smeenk, L. E., de Koning, L. J., van Maarseveen, J. H., de Jong, L., Bertozzi, C. R., Hiemstra, H., and de Koster, C. G. (2009) Selective Enrichment of Azide-Containing Peptides from Complex Mixtures. J Proteome Res 8, 3702-3711.
In addition, Staudinger ligation has recently been shown to be effective for selective enrichment of azide-tagged cross-linked peptides (Vellucci, D., Kao, A., Kaake, R. M., Rychnovsky, S. D., and Huang, L. (2010) Selective Enrichment and Identification of Azide-Tagged Cross-Linked Peptides Using Chemical Ligation and Mass Spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 21, 1432-1445).
Apart from enrichment, detection of cross-linked peptides can be achieved by isotope-labeled, as described in Collins, C. J., Schilling, B., Young, M., Dollinger, G., and Guy, R. K. (2003) Isotopically Labeled Crosslinking Reagents: Resolution of Mass Degeneracy in the Identification of Crosslinked Peptides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 13, 4023-4026; Petrotchenko, E. V., Olkhovik, V. K., and Borchers, C. H. (2005) Isotopically Coded Cleavable Cross-Linker for Studying Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics 4, 1167-1179; and Petrotchenko, E., and Borchers, C. (2010) Icc-Class: Isotopically-Coded Cleavable Crosslinking Analysis Software Suite. BMC bioinformatics 11, 64, fluorescently labeled (Sinz, A., and Wang, K. (2004) Mapping Spatial Proximities of Sulfhydryl Groups in Proteins Using a Fluorogenic Cross-Linker and Mass Spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 331, 27-32), and mass-tag labeled cross-linking reagents, for example as described in Tang, X., Munske, G. R., Siems, W. F., and Bruce, J. E. (2005) Mass Spectrometry Identifiable Cross-Linking Strategy for Studying Protein-Protein Interactions. Anal Chem 77, 311-318; and Back, J. W., Hartog, A. F., Dekker, H. L., Muijsers, A. O., de Koning, L. J., and de Jong, L. (2001) A New Crosslinker for Mass Spectrometric Analysis of the Quaternary Structure of Protein Complexes. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 12, 222-227.
These methods can identify cross-linked peptides with MS analysis, but interpretation of the data generated from inter-linked peptides (two peptides connected with the cross-link) by automated database searching remains difficult. Several bioinformatics tools have thus been developed to interpret MS/MS data and determine inter-linked peptide sequences from complex mixtures, as described in Maiolica, A. et al.; Schilling, B. et al.; Chu, F., Baker, P. R., Burlingame, A. L., and Chalkley, R. J. (2009) Finding Chimeras: A Bioinformatic Strategy for Identification of Cross-Linked Peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 9, 25-31; Gao, Q., Xue, S., Shaffer, S. A., Doneanu, C. E., Goodlett, D. R., and Nelson, S. D. (2008) Minimize the Detection of False Positives by the Software Program Detectshift for 18o-Labeled Cross-Linked Peptide Analysis. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester, Eng) 14, 275-280; Singh, P., Shaffer, S. A., Scherl, A., Holman, C., Pfuetzner, R. A., Larson Freeman, T. J., Miller, S. I., Hernandez, P., Appel, R. D., and Goodlett, D. R. (2008) Characterization of Protein Cross-Links Via Mass Spectrometry and an Open-Modification Search Strategy. Anal Chem 80, 8799-8806; Rinner, O., Seebacher, J., Walzthoeni, T., Mueller, L. N., Beck, M., Schmidt, A., Mueller, M., and Aebersold, R. (2008) Identification of Cross-Linked Peptides from Large Sequence Databases. Nat Methods 5, 315-318; Lee, Y. J., Lackner, L. L., Nunnari, J. M., and Phinney, B. S. (2007) Shotgun Cross-Linking Analysis for Studying Quaternary and Tertiary Protein Structures. J Proteome Res 6, 3908-3917; and Nadeau, O. W., Wyckoff, G. J., Paschall, J. E., Artigues, A., Sage, J., Villar, M. T., and Carlson, G. M. (2008) Crosssearch, a User-Friendly Search Engine for Detecting Chemically Cross-Linked Peptides in Conjugated Proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 739-749.
Although promising, further developments are still needed to make such data analyses as robust and reliable as analyzing MS/MS data of single peptide sequences using existing database searching tools (e.g. Protein Prospector, Mascot or SEQUEST).
Various types of cleavable cross-linkers with distinct chemical properties have been developed to facilitate MS identification and characterization of cross-linked peptides. These include UV photocleavable (Nadeau, O. W., Wyckoff, G. J., Paschall, J. E., Artigues, A., Sage, J., Villar, M. T., and Carlson, G. M. (2008) Crosssearch, a User-Friendly Search Engine for Detecting Chemically Cross-Linked Peptides in Conjugated Proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 739-749), chemical cleavable (Kasper, P. T., et al.), isotopically-coded cleavable (Petrotchenko, E. V., et al.), and MS-cleavable reagents, as described in Tang, X, et. al.; Back, J. W., et. al.; Zhang, H., Tang, X., Munske, G. R., Tolic, N., Anderson, G. A., and Bruce, J. E. (2009) Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions and Topologies in Living Cells with Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 8, 409-420; Soderblom, E. J., and Goshe, M. B. (2006) Collision-Induced Dissociative Chemical Cross-Linking Reagents and Methodology: Applications to Protein Structural Characterization Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis. Anal Chem 78, 8059-8068; Soderblom, E. J., Bobay, B. G., Cavanagh, J., and Goshe, M. B. (2007) Tandem Mass Spectrometry Acquisition Approaches to Enhance Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Low-Energy Collision-Induced Dissociative Chemical Crosslinking Reagents. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21, 3395-3408; Lu, Y., Tanasova, M., Borhan, B., and Reid, G. E. (2008) Ionic Reagent for Controlling the Gas-Phase Fragmentation Reactions of Cross-Linked Peptides. Anal Chem 80, 9279-9287; and Gardner, M. W., Vasicek, L. A., Shabbir, S., Anslyn, E. V., and Brodbelt, J. S. (2008) Chromogenic Cross-Linker for the Characterization of Protein Structure by Infrared Multiphoton Dissociation Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 80, 4807-4819.
MS-cleavable cross-linkers have received considerable attention since the resulting cross-linked products can be identified based on their characteristic fragmentation behavior observed during MS analysis. Gas-phase cleavage sites result in the detection of a “reporter” ion (Back, J. W., et al.), single peptide chain fragment ions (Soderblom, E. J., and Goshe; Soderblom, E. J., Bobay, B. G., et al.; Lu, Y., et al. and Gardner, M. W. et al.), or both reporter and fragment ions (Tang, X., et al.; and Zhang, H. et. al.).
In each case, further structural characterization of the peptide product ions generated during the cleavage reaction can be accomplished by subsequent MSn1 analysis. Among these linkers, the “fixed charge” sulfonium ion containing cross-linker developed by Lu. et. al appears to be the most attractive as it allows specific and selective fragmentation of cross-linked peptides regardless of their charge and amino acid composition based on their studies with model peptides.
Thus, in some embodiments, a novel cross-linking strategy for structural analysis of model proteins and the yeast 20 S proteasome complex by combining a newly designed MS-cleavable cross-linker bis(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) 3,3′-sulfinyldipropanoate (“DSSO”) with an integrated data analysis workflow is provided. As noted herein, while this discussion has centered around DSSO (shown as Compound 1 in
In some embodiments, an effective approach that facilitates fast and accurate identification of DSSO cross-linked peptides by LC MSn is provided. In some embodiments, the new MS-cleavable cross-linker DSSO is attractive for cross-linking studies of protein complexes for a number of reasons: 1) it can be easily synthesized and can cross-link protein complexes effectively at sub-micromolar concentrations (˜1 μM); 2) it has two symmetric CID labile C—S bonds that preferentially fragment prior to peptide backbone breakage; 3) the CID-induced cleavage of inter-linked peptides is specific and independent of peptide charges and sequences; 4) DSSO cross-linked peptides can generate characteristic fragmentation patterns in MS/MS spectra that are unique to different types of cross-linked peptides for easy identification; 5) there are unique mass and charge relationships between MS/MS peptide fragment ions and their parent ions, permitting automated data processing.
In comparison to existing MS-cleavable cross-linkers (Tang, X., et al.; Zhang, H., et al.; Soderblom, E. J., and Goshe, M. B. et al.; Soderblom, E. J., Bobay, B. G., et al.; and Gardner, M. W., et al.), in some embodiments, the DSSO cross-linker can provide a specific and selective fragmentation of cross-linked peptides for identification. The fragmentation patterns of DSSO cross-linked peptides are similar to those of “fixed charge” sulfonium ion containing cross-linked model peptides developed by Lu, Y. et al.
Although DSSO does not carry a fixed charge, in some embodiments, the preferential cleavage of C—S bond adjacent to the sulfoxide in DSSO is as effective as cleavage of the C—S bond in the sulfonium ion containing cross-linker (i.e. S-methyl 5,5′-thiodipentanoylhydroxysuccinimide) (Lu, Y. et al.).
Fragmentation of the sulfonium ion containing cross-linked peptide requires the formation of a five-membered ring with the sulfonium ion and the amide of the linker such that it is not feasible to change spacer lengths in these cross-linkers. In contrast, in some embodiments, the simple fragmentation mechanism gives DSSO the flexibility of changing its spacer lengths to accommodate cross-linking lysines at different distances while maintaining the symmetry of the linker with easily interpretable fragmentation patterns.
In addition, in some embodiments, DSSO has better potential for studying protein interactions by in vivo cross-linking. It is well known that cross-linking study of protein complexes is extremely challenging due to the inherent limitations of current cross-linkers. With the improvement on database searching of non-cleavable inter-linked peptides, it is possible to identify cross-linked peptides of protein complexes using non-cleavable cross-linkers (Maiolica, A., et al.; and Chen, Z. A. et al.). However, this requires a special program for data interpretation and the false positive rate of identifying inter-linked sequences is higher than that of identifying single sequences.
Thus, in some embodiments, the feasibility of using novel DSSO cross-linking strategy to study the structure of the yeast 20S proteasome complex is provided, which is a significant advancement in structural elucidation of multi-subunit protein complexes with improved data analysis and accuracy as such application of MS-cleavable cross-linkers has not been reported before.
In addition to the design of this novel MS-cleavable linker, in some embodiments, an integrated data analysis workflow to achieve fast, easy and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides and the cross-linking sites is provided. Identification of DSSO cross-linked peptides from complex mixtures has been accomplished with high confidence by integrating data analyses of three different datasets, MS, MS/MS and MS3 data. Due to the difficulty in interpreting MS/MS spectra of unseparated inter-linked peptides, many of previously reported inter-linked products were determined only based on parent masses.
In contrast, in some embodiments, all of the inter-linked peptides of cytochrome c, ubiquitin and the yeast 20 S proteasome complex have been identified in this work with three lines of evidence including characteristic fragmentation pairs (Link-Finder), peptide sequence determination by MS3 sequencing (Batch-Tag), and mass mapping (MS-Bridge). In some embodiments, this procedure permits the identification of cross-linked peptides with high accuracy, reliability and speed. It is important to note that existing database search programs can be easily adapted for analyzing DSSO cross-linked peptides, thus a broad application of the DSSO-based cross-linking strategy is foreseeable. Furthermore, in some embodiments, cross-linked peptides of cytochrome c with two links can be identified, suggesting the capability of the new cross-linking strategy for identifying more complex cross-linked products.
Cross-linking/mass spectrometry has been previously attempted to study the yeast 20S proteasome complex using Ru(II)(bpy)2+/3 tris(2,2′-ipyridyl)ruthenium (II) dication)/ammonium persulfate /light-mediated cross-linking (Denison, C., and Kodadek, T. (2004) Toward a General Chemical Method for Rapidly Mapping Multi-Protein Complexes. J Proteome Res 3, 417-425), in which multiple subunit interconnectivity has been determined based on MS identification of co-migrated subunits by SDS-PAGE after cross-linking. No cross-linked peptides were identified due to complicated chemistry of the radical based cross-linking reaction.
Therefore, in some embodiments, a successful use of a cross-linking/mass spectrometry strategy to determine inter-subunit and intra-subunit interaction interfaces of the yeast 20 S proteasome complex. In some embodiments, although only 13 inter-linked peptides of the yeast 20 S proteasome have been identified and reported here, this disclosure presents the first step toward full characterization of proteasome structures using cross-linking/mass spectrometry in the future. The feasibility of using the DSSO-based cross-linking strategy to identify cross-linked peptides of a large protein complex at 1 μM or less concentration is very significant and of great promise to structural studies of protein complexes since purifying protein complexes at high concentrations is technically challenging.
During LC MSn analysis using LTQ-Orbitrap XL MS, collision energy cannot be adjusted on the fly to account for differences in peptide charge states, therefore compromised collision energy is set during the entire LC MSn run. Thus, it is contemplated that there exists a possibility that the collision energy may be too high for the highly charged ions while too low for peptides with lower charges. It is contemplated that future improvement on charge selection and energy adjustment during LC MSn data acquisition may be needed to further enhance the quality of the results. Additionally, it is contemplated that optimized peptide separation prior to LC MSn analysis will be necessary to improve the dynamic range of peptide analysis and allow the detection of low abundance cross-linked peptides. Moreover, it is contemplated that refinement of the Link-Finder program is needed to improve the identification of intra-linked peptides. Lastly, it is contemplated that the addition of an affinity tag to the sulfoxide containing cross-linker will improve detection of cross-linked peptides, which will be the subject of future study.
Thus, in some embodiments, a new MS-cleavable cross-linker family of compounds, including DSSO that are applicable for model peptides, proteins and a multi-subunit protein complex is provided. The unique MS features of DSSO cross-linked peptides together with the integrated data analysis workflow for analyzing LC MSn data provided herein greatly reduce the time spent identifying cross-linked peptides. Given its simplicity, speed and accuracy, in some embodiments, this cross-linking strategy will have a broad application in elucidating structures of proteins and protein complexes in the future.
In some embodiments, a new crosslinking compound is provided and has the structure:
where x is selected from the group consisting of
wherein R is methyl or ethyl,
In some embodiments, the cross-linking agent is DSSO:
In some embodiments, the new cross-linking agents are used to facilitate mapping of protein-protein interactions of protein complexes. In some embodiments, the method comprises the steps of providing a MS-cleavable cross-linker having the structure described above; forming a cross-linked protein complex by cross-linking proteins with the MS-cleavable cross-linker; forming cross-linked peptide fragments that are chemically bound to the MS-cleavable cross-linker by digesting the cross-linked protein complex with an enzyme such as trypsin; and using mass spectrometry (MS) and MSn analysis to identify the protein and/or peptide fragments. For convenience, in the discussion that follows, reference is sometimes made to the particular crosslinker, DSSO. It will be understood, however, that any of the other MS-cleavable crosslinkers that fit the general structure may also be used. Thus, DSSO fragments, DSSO remnants, DSSO cross-linked peptides, and like language applies equally to other crosslinkers as described herein.
The CID-induced separation of inter-linked peptides in MS/MS permits MS3 analysis of single peptide chain fragment ions with defined modifications (due to diamide remnants) for easy interpretation and unambiguous identification using existing database searching tools. Integration of data analyses from three generated datasets (MS, MS/MS and MS3) allows high confidence identification of DSSO cross-linked peptides. The efficacy of the newly developed DSSO-based cross-linking strategy has been demonstrated using model peptides and proteins. In addition, this method has been successfully employed for structural characterization of the yeast 20 S proteasome complex. In total, 13 non-redundant inter-linked peptides of the 20 S proteasome have been identified, representing the first application of an MS-cleavable cross-linker for the characterization of a multi-subunit protein complex. Given its effectiveness and simplicity, this cross-linking strategy can find a broad range of applications in elucidating structural topology of proteins and protein complexes.
In some embodiments, in combination with new software developed for data integration, DSSO cross-linked peptides were identified from complex peptide mixtures with speed and accuracy. Given its effectiveness and simplicity, in some embodiments, a broader application of this MS-cleavable cross-linker in the study of structural topology of other protein complexes using cross-linking and mass spectrometry is contemplated.
In order to develop a robust MS-cleavable cross-linking reagent, the incorporated MS-labile bond must have the ability to selectively and preferentially fragment prior to peptide backbone breakage independent of peptide charges and sequences. It is well documented that methionine sulfoxide containing peptides have preferential fragmentation at the C—S bond adjacent to the sulfoxide during collision induced dissociation (CID) analysis (see Reid, G. E., Roberts, K. D., Kapp, E. A., and Simpson, R. I. (2004) Statistical and Mechanistic Approaches to Understanding the Gas-Phase Fragmentation Behavior of Methionine Sulfoxide Containing Peptides. J Proteome Res 3, 751-759), and this fragmentation is dominant and much more labile than peptide bonds.
Such labile fragmentation has often been observed as the loss of 64 Da (—SOCH4) from oxidized methionine containing peptides in routine peptide analysis. Therefore, in some embodiments, it is contemplated that if a sulfoxide is incorporated in the spacer region of a NHS ester, the C—S bond adjacent to the sulfoxide will be MS-labile and prone to preferential fragmentation.
In some embodiments, the synthesis of a CID cleavable cross-linker having a general structure of 3,3′-sulfinylbispropanoic acid, also known as 3,3-′sulfonyldipropanoic acid is provided. The molecular structure is C6H10O5S, and it has a general structure as shown in General Structure 2 of
In some embodiments, other compounds where the X in the General Structure 2 are substituted are shown as Compounds 3-6 in
General chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, N.H.) or VWR International (West Chester, Pa.). Bovine heart cytochrome c (98% purity) and bovine erythrocyte ubiquitin (98% purity) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Synthetic peptide Ac-IR7 (Ac-IEAEKGR (SEQ ID NO: 2), 98.1% purity) was synthesized by GL Biochem (Shanghai, China). Sequencing grade modified trypsin was purchased from Promega (Fitchburg, Wis.). The 20 S proteasome core particle was affinity purified using Prel-TAP expressing yeast strain as previously described in Leggett, D. S., Hanna, J., Borodovsky, A., Crosas, B., Schmidt, M., Baker, R. T., Walz, T., Ploegh, H., and Finley, D. (20032) Multiple Associated Proteins Regulate Proteasome Structure and Function. Mol Cell. 10, 495-507.
In some embodiments, to synthesize DSSO, a solution of sulfide S-1 (0.600 g, 1.61 mmol) in CHCl3 (30 ml) at 0° C. was mixed with a solution of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (MCPBA) (0.371 g, 1.61 mmol) in CHCl3 (10 ml). The reaction product was filtered and washed with cold CHCl3 (10 ml) and cold MeOH (10 ml). The filtrate was cooled to −10° C. for 1 h, washed again with CHCl3 and MeOH, and dried under reduced pressure to yield 0.400 g (64%) of DSSO: 1H (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.28-3.21 (m, 2H), 3.17-3.13 (m, 4H), 3.08-2.99 (m, 2H), 2.88-2.75 (s, 8H); 13C (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.08, 167.74, 44.62, 25.46, 23.41; IR (KBr pellet) 2943, 1786, 1720 cm−1; HRMS (ES/MeOH) m/z calculated for C14H16N2O9Na [M+Na]+ 411.0474, found 411.0471.
In some embodiments, a similar synthetic approach is used to make the other symmetric diesters identified above and having the general structure 2, where X is as defined above. Thus, the symmetric sulfide is prepared by reacting 3,3′-thiodipropionic acid with the appropriate N-hydroxyamine (e.g., a functionalized analogue of N-hydroxysucinimide (compounds 4-7), or other N-hydroxy-functionalized heterocycle (compounds 3, 8, and 9), and then the sulfinyl group is made by treating the symmetric sulfide with MCPBA in CHCl3 or another appropriate solvent.
Three types of cross-linked peptides can be formed during the cross-linking reaction: inter-linked (type 2), intra-linked (type 1) and dead-end (type 0) modified peptides (Schilling, B., et al.), among which inter-linked peptides are the most informative for generating distance constraints.
If peptides α and β have different sequences, two possible pairs of fragments (i.e. αA/βS and αS/βA) will be observed due to the breakage of either of the two symmetric C—S bonds next to the sulfoxide in the spacer region of DSSO (
DSSO dead-end modified peptides have a defined mass modification (+176 Da) due to the half-hydrolyzed DSSO (
As shown in
For DSSO inter-linked peptides (α-β), the mass sum of each fragment pair (αA/βS or αS/βA) is equivalent to the mass of the parent ion (
As for the dead-end (DN) modified peptide αDN, each fragment (i.e. αA, αS or αT) has a distinct mass difference from the parent ion (
LC MSn analysis of DSSO cross-linked peptides was performed using a LTQ-Orbitrap XL MS (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, Calif.) with an on-line Eksigent NanoLC system (Eksigent, Dublin, Calif.). The LC separation was the same as previously described by Vellucci, D., et al. The MSn method was set specifically for analyzing DSSO cross-linked peptides. Each acquisition cycle of a MSn experiment includes one MS scan in FT mode (350-1800 m/z, resolution of 60,000 at m/z 400) followed by two data-dependent MS/MS scans with normalized collision energy at 10 or 15% on the top two peaks from the MS scan, and then three MS3 scans operated in LTQ with normalized collision energy at 29% on the top three peaks from each of the MS/MS scans. For initial analyses, MS/MS spectra were acquired in LTQ in LC MSn experiments. For automated data analysis, MS/MS spectra were obtained in FT mode (resolution of 7500).
In some embodiments, in order to characterize the new DSSO linker, several model peptides were cross-linked including Ac-IR7, Ac-myelin, and substance P. Under the experimental conditions, the major cross-linked products for Ac-IR7 and Ac-myelin are inter-linked, whereas substance P mostly formed dead-end modified peptides. All of the cross-linked model peptides were subjected to LC MSn analysis. The inter-linked Ac-IR7 peptide (α-α) was detected as doubly charged (m/z 923.462+) and triply charged (m/z 615.973+) ions (
Cross-linking of synthetic peptides with DSSO was performed by dissolving synthetic peptides Ac-IR7, Ac-myelin and substance P in DMSO to 1 mM and cross-linked with DSSO dissolved in DMSO in a ratio of 1:1 in the presence of 1 equivalent diisopropylethylamine similarly as described Vellucci, D, et al. The cross-linked peptide solution was then diluted to 1 pmol/μl in 4% ACN, 0.1% formic acid for liquid chromatography multi-stage tandem mass spectrometry (LC MSn) analysis.
Since the two inter-linked sequences are identical, only one fragment pair (i.e. αA/αS) was observed as expected. The results suggest that MS/MS fragmentation of inter-linked peptides is independent of peptide charges. It should be noted that besides unique mass relationships, the fragment ions in each pair have a defined charge relationship associated to the charge of the parent ion. In other words, the sum of the observed charges for each fragment in a pair equals the charge of the parent ion. For example, the triply charged parent ion (m/z 615.973+) generated the fragment pair with one doubly charged (αA2+) and one singly charged (αS1+) ion, whereas the doubly charge parent ion (m/z 923.462+) only produced a fragment pair with two singly charged (αA1+ and αS1+) ions.
This information can be used to validate the fragment pairs identified by masses. The respective MS3 analysis of αA and αS ions (
While the fragment pair βA/βS was detected in MS/MS spectra of quintuply and quadruply charged inter-linked Ac-myelin (β-β) (m/z 549.685+, 686.844+) (
In addition to inter-linked peptides, dead-end modified peptides were analyzed.
In some embodiments, the applicability of DSSO for protein cross-linking under physiological conditions was evaluated. Model proteins cytochrome c (see for previously described Sinz, A. (2003); Kasper, P. T., et al.; Nessen, M. A., et al.; Vellucci, D., et al.; Lee, Y. J., et al.; Pearson, K. M., Pannell, L. K., and Fales, H. M. (2002) Intramolecular Cross-Linking Experiments on Cytochrome C and Ribonuclease a Using an Isotope Multiplet Method. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16, 149-159; Dihazi, G. H., and Sinz, A. (2003) Mapping Low-Resolution Three-Dimensional Protein Structures Using Chemical Cross-Linking and Fourier Transform Ion-Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry. 17, 2005-2014; and Guo, X., Bandyopadhyay, P., Schilling, B., Young, M. M., Fujii, N., Aynechi, T., Guy, R. K., Kuntz, I. D., and Gibson, B. W. (2008) Partial Acetylation of Lysine Residues Improves Intraprotein Cross-Linking. Anal Chem 80, 951-960) and ubiquitin (Chowdhury, S. M., et al.; and Gardner, M. W., et al.) have been extensively utilized to test various new cross-linking strategies since they have a relatively large number of lysine residues accessible for cross-linking.
Cross-linking of Cytochrome C and Ubiquitin with DSSO was performed using lyophilized bovine cytochrome c or ubiquitin reconstituted in 1× PBS (pH 7.5) to 200 μM, 20 μl of which was mixed with 2 μl 20 mM DSSO (in DMSO) in a molar ratio of 1:10 (protein:cross-linker) for the cross-linking reaction as described in Vellucci, D., et al. The cross-linked protein was digested with trypsin (1% w/w) overnight at 37° C. The cross-linked peptide digest was then diluted to 1 pmol/μl in 4% ACN, 0.1% formic acid for LC MSn analysis.
Based on previous work (see Vellucci, D., et al.), cytochrome c was cross-linked with a 10-fold excess of DSSO. The cytochrome c cross-linking efficiency using DSSO was comparable to the efficiency using DSG or previously developed Azide-DSG cross-linkers (see Vellucci, D., et al.), indicating that DSSO is as effective for protein cross-linking reactions. The DSSO cross-linked cytochrome c was then digested with trypsin and analyzed by LC MSn. Three types of cross-linked peptides of cytochrome c (i.e. inter-link, intra-link and dead-end) have been observed.
Two possible fragment pairs, αA/βS/T and αS/T/βA are thus expected, in which S/T means either S (sulfenic) or T (unsaturated thiol) containing fragment ions will be observed. Using the mass relationship between the pairs and the parent ion of inter-linked peptides (Eqs. 1, 2, 5 in
Mass mapping of the parent ion (m/z 419.97164+) by MS-Bridge revealed that it matches to an inter-linked peptide [Ac-GDVEKGKK (SEQ ID NO: 11) inter-linked to KKGER (SEQ ID NO: 13)] with an error of 0.48 ppm. The fragment ions αA (m/z 478.992+) and βT (m/z 352.402+) were further subjected to MS3 sequencing and their MS3 spectra are illustrated in
It is noted that some charge distribution of fragment ions was observed in the pairs (
To understand how dead-end modified peptides of cytochrome c behave in MSn analysis,
As discussed above (
This suggests that the peptide is potentially an intra-linked peptide of cytochrome c and its MS/MS fragment ion (m/z 606.242+) can be labeled as αA+T. Mass mapping of the parent ion m/z 611.98023+ using MS-Bridge matched to an intra-linked peptide, GGK*HK*TGPNLHGLFGR (SEQ ID NO: 24), where the two N-terminal K* (Lys*) are linked. Since the CID-induced C—S bond breakage can occur at either side of the sulfoxide, a mixture of two fragments with identical masses but with alkene (A) or thiol (T) moieties at either K can be generated.
In order to facilitate data analysis for the identification of DSSO cross-linked peptides from complex mixtures, an integrated workflow for processing LC MSn data acquired by LTQ-Orbitrap XL MS was developed (
Based on the unique MS/MS fragmentation profiles of DSSO cross-linked peptides and the defined mass relationships between parent ions and their fragment ions (
If two of those pairs can be found, and the mass difference between any two fragments from the two distinct pairs is 32 Da, i.e., the mass difference between the thiol and alkene moieties, then it is almost certain that the parent ion is a true inter-linked product. The dead-end product typically has two major fragment ions representing the parent peptide attached with either a thiol or an alkene moiety. Among the top three peaks, if there are two peaks with mass difference of 32 Da, and one of them is 90 Da less than the parent mass, then it is categorized as a possible dead-end peptide. Using the Link-Finder program, a list of parent ions are identified as putative inter-linked or dead-end modified peptides. The generated list of parent ion masses is then subjected to MS-Bridge to identify putative cross-linked peptides of all types by mass matching with high mass accuracy (<10 ppm).
For MS3 data, only the original parent ion observed in MS scan is listed as the precursor ion during database searching. In order to extract the MS3 parent ion (fragment ions in MS/MS), for Batch-Tag search, the second data extraction step is carried out using in-house scripts to generate a modified MS3-txt file. The Batch-Tag search result provides high confidence identification of single peptide fragments generated in MS/MS that are initially cross-linked. Finally, the results from three different types of searches, i.e. Batch-Tag (MS3 data), Link-Finder (MS/MS data), and MS-Bridge (MS data) are integrated using in-house scripts within Link-Finder program to obtain accurate and reliable identification of cross-linked peptides. Among them, MS3 sequencing with Batch-Tag searching is essential for unambiguous identification of cross-linking sites.
The newly developed integrated workflow was first employed to identify DSSO cross-linked peptides of cytochrome c. In total, 19 inter-linked peptides have been unambiguously identified and summarized in TABLE 1 (for details see TABLE 3). Each peptide has characteristic fragment pairs in MS/MS spectra and was identified by Link-Finder program. In addition, one or two MS/MS fragment pair ions have been sequenced by MS3 to provide unambiguous identification. Moreover, all of the parent masses fit well with identified cross-linked peptides by MS-Bridge program with high mass accuracy. In comparison to reported cross-linking studies of cytochrome c (Schilling, B., et al.; Kasper, P. T. et al.;Nessen, M. A. et al.; Vellucci, D. et al.; Lee, Y. J., et al.; Pearson, K. M., et al.; Dihazi, G. H.; and Guo, X., et al.), three novel inter-links have been identified in this work. Besides the inter-linked peptides, 7 intra-linked and 8 dead-end peptides have also been identified (See TABLE 3). For the dead-end modified peptides, each has a dead-end fragment pair and at least one of the fragment ions has been sequenced, which correlates very well with MS-Bridge and Batch-Tag results. The intra-linked peptides were mainly identified by Batch-Tag and MS-Bridge results.
In addition to products with one cross-link (i.e. type 0, 1 and 2), peptides containing two cross-links have also been identified using this integrated workflow. In this work, 11 non-redundant DSSO cross-linked peptides with two links (e.g. one inter-link with one dead-end, one inter-link with one intra-link, or one intra-link with one dead-end) have been identified and summarized in TABLE 3. This type of information is not commonly reported since peptide sequencing of multi-linked peptides is highly complicated. This demonstrates the ability of the new cross-linking strategy provided herein for identifying such complex products.
Based on the crystal structure of bovine heart cytochrome c (PDB ID; 2B4Z) (44), the distances between alpha carbons of the identified cross-linked lysine residues were calculated (TABLE 1 and TABLE 3). Among the 26 non-redundant inter-linked lysines in cytochrome c identified in this work (excluding linkages between two adjacent lysines), all of the linkages have the distances between their alpha carbons within the range of 5.3 Å to 19.3 Å. This is consistent not only with the length of a fully expanded DSSO (10.1 Å spacer length) and two lysine side chains, but also with the previous results using similar lengths of NHS ester cross-linkers (see Vellucci, D., et al.; Lee, Y. J., et al.; Guo, X., et al.; and Kruppa, G. H., Schoeniger, J., and Young, M. M. (2003) A Top Down Approach to Protein Structural Studies Using Chemical Cross-Linking and Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17, 155-162). The results suggest that the cross-linking conditions herein did not induce significant disturbance to cytochrome c structural conformations.
In addition to cytochrome c, the same strategy has been successfully applied to identify DSSO cross-linked peptides of ubiquitin. Using the same analysis strategy, 3 inter-linked, 1 intra-linked, and 5 dead-end peptides have been identified as summarized in TABLE 4. Based on the crystal structure of bovine ubiquitin (PDB ID; 1AAR), all of the identified inter-/intra-linked lysines in ubiquitin have the distances between their alpha carbons within the range of 6 to 18 Å. The identified cross-linked lysines are consistent with the known structure of ubiquitin and previous reports (Chowdhury, S. M., et al.; and Gardner, M. W., et al.)
It is interesting to note that one of the identified inter-linked peptides is [LIFAGK48QLEDGR (SEQ ID NO: 63) inter-linked to LIFAGK48QLEDGR (SEQ ID NO: 63)], which is a cross-link formed between the ubiquitin dimer. Residue K48 is located at a hydrophobic patch important for protein interactions and K48 is also an in vivo chain linkage site for polyubiquitination required for ubiquitin/ATP dependent proteasomal degradation (Pickart, C. M., and Cohen, R. E. (2004) Proteasomes and Their Kin: Proteases in the Machine Age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 5, 177-187). The same K48-K48(Lys48-Lys48) cross-link was identified previously using an alkyne-tagged NHS ester, but only after selective enrichment coupled with CID and ETD analyses (Chowdhury, S. M., et al.). In comparison, in some embodiment, the K48 inter-linked peptide without any enrichment was identified, thus further demonstrating the effectiveness of the approach disclosed herein to identify DSSO cross-linked peptides from complex mixtures.
The ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway plays an important role in regulating many biological processes (Pickart, C. M., et al.) The 26 S proteasome complex is the macromolecular machine responsible for ubiquitin/ATP dependent protein degradation, and it is composed of two subcomplexes: the 20S core particle and the 19 S regulatory complex. To date, only the crystal structure of the 20 S proteasome complex has been resolved. However, structures of the 19 S and 26 S remain elusive, thus hindering the understanding of the structure and functional relationship of the 26 S proteasome complex. To develop an effective cross-linking strategy to elucidate structures of the 19 S and 26 S proteasome complexes, the structure of the yeast 20 S proteasome complex using the DSSO cross-linking approach was investigated.
In some embodiments, cross-linking of the Yeast 20 S Proteasome with DSSO was performed. Affinity purified yeast 20S proteasome complex was concentrated by Microcon (Billerica, Mass.) to ˜1.2 μM in 1× PBS buffer (pH 7.5). Typically 50 μl of the 20S proteasome was cross-linked with 3 μl DSSO (20 mM) dissolved in DMSO (final concentration ˜1 mM) at a molar ratio of 1:1000 (protein:cross-linker). Cross-linking was performed for a half hour or overnight and quenched with excess ammonium bicarbonate buffer. Cysteine residues were reduced with 5 mM DTT at 56° C. for 30 mins, and alkylated with 10 mM choloroacetamide for 30 min at room temperature. The cross-linked protein complex was digested with trypsin (2% w/w) overnight at 37° C. Digested peptides were desalted by C18 OMIX ZipTip (Varian, Palo Alto, Calif.) prior to LC MSn analysis.
For some analyses, 2-dimensional LC MSn analysis was carried out. Off-line strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography was performed as the first dimension of separation using an AKTA HPLC system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) as described in Kaake, R. M., et al. Each fraction was desalted by ZipTip prior to LC MSn analysis.
The cross-linking of the 20 S proteasome complex was carried out in PBS buffer under conditions allowing efficient cross-linking of all subunits as based on 1-D SDS-PAGE (
As an example,
In addition, 21 dead-end modified peptides were identified by multiple lines of evidence as illustrated in TABLE 5. The fragmentation behavior for the dead-end modified peptides of the 20 S subunits is the same as that of cytochrome c showing two distinct dead-end pairs in MS/MS spectra. This is illustrated with an example shown in
The experimentally determined structure of the yeast 20 S proteasome holocomplex was utilized (Protein Data Bank code 1RYP) to assess the cross-linked lysine pairs identified in this study. For each identified cross-link the distance between the alpha carbons was calculated and the results are summarized in TABLE 2. Considering the spacer length of DSSO and lysine side chains, the theoretical upper limit for the distance between the alpha carbon atoms of paired lysines is approximately 26 Å. In some embodiments, the distances are within this upper limit, providing some evidence that the proteasome cross-links are formed in the native state. The quaternary proteasome structure is formed by four stacked seven-member rings in the order αββα. The side view and basal view of the arrangement among one set of the symmetric αβ rings and their subunits are shown in
Data Analysis of DSSO Cross-linked Peptides as follows. Monoisotopic masses of parent ions and corresponding fragment ions, parent ion charge states and ion intensities from LC MS/MS and LC MS3 spectra were extracted using in-house software based on Raw_Extract script from Xcalibur v2.4 (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, Calif.). Database searching was performed with a developmental version of Protein Prospector (v. 5.5.0, University of California, San Francisco) (http://prospector.ucsf.edu/prospector/mshome.htm) using its software suite, i.e. Batch-Tag and MS-Bridge as described in Chu, F., et al. Using in-house scripts, extracted MS3 data were reformatted such that MS3 fragment ions were directly linked to their MS/MS parent ions.
For cytochrome c (P62894) and ubiquitin (P62990) analyses, database searching of MS3 spectra was performed using Batch-Tag against their accession numbers in SwissProt.2009.09.01 database. For the 20S proteasome, Batch-Tag search of MS3 data was performed against a decoy database consisting of a normal SGD yeast database concatenated with its reversed version (total 13490 protein entries). The mass tolerances for parent ions and fragment ions were set as ±20 ppm and 0.6 Da, respectively. Trypsin was set as the enzyme and a maximum of two missed cleavages were allowed. Protein N-terminal acetylation, methionine oxidation, and N-terminal conversion of glutamine to pyroglutamic acid were selected as variable modifications. In addition, three defined modifications on uncleaved lysines were chosen, including alkene (C3H2O, +54 Da), sulfenic acid (C3H4O2S, +104 Da), and thiol (C3H2SO, +86 Da) modifications due to remnants of the cross-linker (
The Link-Finder program (http://www.ics.uci.edu/˜baldig/Link-Finder/) was developed to search MS/MS data and identify the list of putative DSSO inter-linked and dead-end products based on their unique MS fragmentation patterns as illustrated in
In some embodiments, analysis of the MS/MS data is carried out using the Link-Finder program. Monoisotopic masses and charges of parent ions measured in MS scans for those putative cross-linked peptides identified by the Link-Finder program were subsequently submitted to MS-Bridge to determine cross-linked peptide sequences by mass mapping with a given cross-linker (i.e. DSSO) and protein sequences (see Chu, F.,et al.). For example, one embodiment of the invention further includes mass mapping the MS data using the list of parent ions corresponding to the cross-linked peptide candidates and the MS-cleavable cross-linker againt known protein sequences to obtain an MS result comprising possible cross-linked peptide sequences.
In some embodiments, the mass mapping is carried out using MS-Bridge. The parent mass error for MS-Bridge search was set as ±10 ppm and only one cross-link was allowed in the cross-linked peptides for general search. All of the three types of the cross-linked peptides (Schilling, B., et al.), i.e. inter-linked (type 2), intra-linked (type 1) and dead-end modified (type 0), can be computed and matched in MS-Bridge (see Chu, F.,et al.).
The search results from Link-Finder, Batch-Tag and MS-Bridge programs are integrated together using in-house scripts to compile a list of cross-linked peptides identified with high confidence. The final results were validated manually by examining MS/MS spectra and MS3 spectra respectively.
The cross-linking Mass Spectrometry (XL-MS) technique extracts structural information from protein complexes without requiring highly purified samples, crystallinity, or large amounts of material. However, there are challenges to applying the technique to protein complexes in vitro, and those challenges become more daunting with in vivo experiments. Issues include effective detection and identification of cross-linked peptides from complex mixtures. While MS-cleavable cross-linkers facilitate the sequencing and identification of cross-linked peptides, enrichable cross-linkers increase their detectability by allowing their separation from non-cross-linked peptides prior to MS analysis. Although a number of cross-linkers with single functionality have been developed in recent years, an ideal reagent would incorporate both capabilities for XL-MS studies.
Therefore, two new cross-linkers have been designed and prepared that incorporate an azide (azide-A-DSBSO) or alkyne (alkyne-A-DSBSO) to enable affinity purification strategies based on click chemistry. The integration of an acid cleavage site next to the enrichment handle allows easy recovery of cross-linked products during affinity purification. In addition, these sulfoxide containing cross-linking reagents possess robust MS-cleavable bonds to facilitate fast and easy identification of cross-linked peptides using MS analysis. Optimized, gram-scale syntheses of these cross-linkers have been developed and the azide-A-DSBSO cross-linker has been evaluated with peptides and proteins to demonstrate its utility in XL-MS analysis.
In some embodiments, the preparation of two-CID-cleavable lysine cross-linkers, an azide (azide-A-DSBSO) and an alkyne (alkyne-A-DSBSO) are provided.
In some embodiments, initial characterization of azide (azide-A-DSBSO) and an alkyne (alkyne-A-DSBSO) using a model peptide and a model protein are provided.
In some embodiments, while not trivial, the syntheses procedures provided herein have been optimized to make these useful compounds available on multigram scale.
In some embodiments, the azide and alkyne functional groups are suitable for click enrichment strategies.
In some embodiments, the cross-linkers described herein have been utilized in mammalian HEK-293 cells6.
In some embodiments, the cross-linkers described herein facilitate the study of the interaction of subunits in the proteasome complex, which is responsible for degradation of ubiquitin tagged proteins.6
In some embodiments, the importance of developing XL-MS reagents that are applicable for in vivo studies is significant because protein-protein interactions are involved in most cell function and are not well understood.
Most proteins act in association with other proteins to form protein complexes stably or transiently in cells, and mapping these interactions is essential to understand their cellular functions. Protein complexes represent functional entities that are often difficult to analyze using conventional structural cools clue to their heterogeneous and dynamic nature. Recently, cross-linking Mass Spectrometry (XL-MS) has been recognized as a valuable tool for the structural analysis of protein assemblies, which can be used alone and in combination with other techniques.1,2 In addition to in vitro studies, XL-MS approaches have been extended to capture protein interactions in living cells.3
Identification of cross-linked peptides by MS analysis can provide distance constraints to assist computational modeling and yield structural information at amino acid resolution.4 The advantages of cross-linking studies include small sample size, robust tolerance for size and environment of the protein complex, instrument accessibility, and the speed of handling and data collection. Although successful, inherent limitations in current XL-MS strategies require further developments to enable MS detection and identification of cross-linked peptides with better efficiency, accuracy, sensitivity and speed. Among various approaches to improve existing XL-MS workflow,5 developing new cross-linking reagents holds the greatest promise towards the ultimate goal of mapping protein-protein interactions in living cells at the systems level.
In some embodiments, the chemical synthesis of two new cross-linking agents is provided whose effectiveness has recently been demonstrated for in vivo protein-protein analysis.6
Unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides can be greatly facilitated by the introduction of a MS cleavable bond in a cross-linking reagent, which can fragment during collision induced dissociation (CID) prior to peptide backbone breakage.7 In some embodiments, successful development of a new class of robust MS-cleavable reagents that contain labile C—S sulfoxide bonds (e.g. DSSO (disuccinimidylsulfoxide),
In some embodiments, with DSSO as an example, the new XL-MS workflow provided herein involves protein DSSO cross-linking, trypsin digestion of cross-linked proteins, and LC/MSn analysis of resulting peptide mixtures. During MSn analysis, the cross-linked peptides are first detected in MS1 and selected for subsequent MS2 analysis. The CID-fragmentation site, i.e. one of the C—S sulfoxide bonds, is selectively fragmented in MS2, allowing the physical separation of the two DSSO cross-linked peptide constituents for subsequent sequencing. The resulting peptide fragments in MS2 are then analyzed in MS for unambiguous identification. The integration of these three types of MS data (MS1, MS2, MS3) enables simplified analysis of DSSO cross-linked peptides with improved speed and accuracy. This strategy has been demonstrated to be effective in the structural analysis of purified protein complexes in vitro.4
The analytical problem with effectively detecting and identifying cross-linked peptides becomes much more daunting with large, complex protein assemblies and especially when studying protein-protein interactions in living cells. A strategy to improve the sensitivity and efficiency of XL-MS analysis is to incorporate an affinity purification handle into the cross-linker itself.
To this end, in some embodiments, an azide-tagged cross-linking reagent is provided that allows the incorporation of an affinity purification handle based on click chemistry for enriching cross-linked peptides prior to MS analysis, thus improving their detection and identification.18 In comparison to other enrichment handles incorporated in cross-linking reagents,10 the azide group is advantageous as it is small, bioorthogonal, and click chemistry has been proven effective in enriching biological samples for various proteomic analyses including cross-linking studies.11
In some embodiments, in order to combine these unique features in a multifunctional cross-linking reagent that can advance current XL-MS workflow for studying protein-protein interactions in vivo as well as in vitro, a new class of low molecular weight, membrane permeable, enrichable and MS-cleavable cross-linkers is provided.
In some embodiments, in order to explore the flexibility of using azide-alkyne click chemistry in the XL-MS workflow, two new cross-linkers, i.e., azide-tagged and an alkyne-tagged reagents were designed and synthesized as presented in
The N-hydroxysuccinimidyl (NHS) esters are designed to react with lysine side chains thus cross-linking the proteins in the complex. The sulfoxide groups provide MS-cleavable bonds, and because only one side of each sulfoxide has β-hydrogen atoms, the elimination must take place regioselectively at the outer c-s bond. The design incorporates an
azide functional group to be used in click reactions with strained alkynes or in a coppe(r)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC).12
The click and CuAAC reactions enable several strategies for affinity purification, including direct coupling with alkyne or azide-functionalized beads or by linking with common affinity ligands such as biotin.11 Finally, the azide portion of the molecule is joined to the cross-linker with an acid labile acetal bond, which can be cleaved under aqueous acidic conditions to facilitate selective elution from an affinity column.
The same elements are incorporated into the alkyne-A-DSBSO (alkyne-tagged, acid-cleavable disuccinimidyl-bissulfoxide) 4, except that the azide functional group
has been exchanged for the complementary alkyne. One other design feature is that both of these cross-linkers, prior to the introduction of the sulfoxides, are achiral and exist as single stereoisomers (
This feature offers considerable simplification in the preparation and analysis of the synthetic intermediates, and decreases the chance of any stereoselective behavior in the crosslinking environment. These reagents have been under investigation for several years in our program and their applications in mapping protein-protein interactions at the systems level in living cells were recently described.6 In this report, the syntheses of these reagents are described in full along with foundational studies on the cross-linking effectiveness and LC/MSn sequencing.
The original synthesis of azide-A-DSBSO 3 began with pentaerythritol (5) and is presented in
Brønsted or Lewis acids in refluxing solvent, which required isolation and recycling of a small amount of the recovered acetal 9. By carefully optimizing the catalyst quantity, time, and temperature in microwave reaction conditions the conversion to diol 10 could be pushed to completion with isolated yields of ˜94%. Diol 10 is a key intermediate in the synthesis, and it is the branch point for the preparation of the azide cross-linker 3 and the alkyne cross-linker 4. It was prepared in five steps following this route in 64% overall yield with only one chromatographic purification.14
The remainder of the synthesis of azide cross-linker 3 is outlined in
In the course of in vivo studies,6 it was found that the azide 3 cross the membrane and produced cross-links in targeted protein complexes.6 The studies require a large excess of cross-linker, and led to an ongoing demand for more material. Although the original optimized synthesis in
The new route (
The 5-azidopentan-2-one was initially prepared by the alkylation of commercially available bromide 18 with NaN3.15 The very high cost of bromide 18 led us to develop a more economical approach starting with lactone 17 (3-acetyldihydrofuran-2(3H)-one) (
The alkyne 4 was prepared from diol 10 using a very similar route (
Given the similarity of cleavable C—S bonds in azide-A-DSBSO and DSSO, it was anticipated that azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked peptides would display comparable fragmentation characteristics to DSSO cross-linked peptides (
To examine MS2 fragmentation patterns of azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked peptides during MSn analysis, the model peptide Ac-myelin was first cross-linked and analyzed. MS1 analysis detected azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked Ac-myelin (α-α) homodimer at four different charge states (m/z 501.416+, 601.45+, 751.624+, 1001.823+) (
In some embodiments, to demonstrate the applicability of azide-A-DSBSO for XL-MS studies, the model protein cytochrome C was cross-linked with with azide-A-DSBSO. Cytochrome C has been used extensively by us and other groups for evaluating cross-linking reagents because it is a small protein with a high number of lysine residues. Given its success in the past for cross-linking studies,4,18 it was decided to use it as the model protein for characterizing our new cross-linking reagent. The resulting cross-linked cytochrome C products were conjugated with BARAC-biotin,19 affinity purified by binding to Streptavidin beads, and digested with trypsin.
The cross-linked peptides were eluted from the beads with acid, and thus became acid-cleaved products of azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked peptides, i.e., DSBSO cross-linked peptides, which were then subjected to LC/MSn analysis. The general workflow and the structure of the cross-linked peptides leading up to LC/MSn analysis are illustrated in
Since the cleavable C—S bonds in SDBSO are similar to those in DSSO, the general data analysis work flow for the identification of SDBSO cross-linked peptides by LC/MSn is similar to the analysis of DSSO cross-linked peptides.4 There are three types of cross-linked peptides, i.e., dead-end, intra-linked, and inter-linked peptides. Among them, inter-linked peptides provide the most informative structure details for defining protein-protein interaction interfaces. Therefore, in some embodiments, the goal that is most interested is to identify inter-linked peptides between the same and/or different proteins.
As an example,
In total, LC/MSn analysis of enriched cross-linked cytochrome C identified 7 unique inter-linked peptides. TABLE 7 provides summary of Unique Inter-linked Peptides Identified from Azide-A-DSBSO Cross-linked CytC. In addition, 11 unique dead-end and 5 unique intralinked cytochrome C peptides were identified since all types of cross-linked peptides can be selectively enriched (data not shown). The results are comparable to those obtained using DSSO cross-linking,4 demonstrating the effectiveness of azide-A-DSBSO based XL-MS strategy. Although it is not necessary to enrich cross-linked peptides for simple proteins like cytochrome C, it is evident that such a process is essential for mapping protein interaction interfaces at the systems level.6
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics, Alfa Aesar, TCI, Advanced ChemTech, or Fisher and used without further purification unless otherwise noted. 1,5-Dioxaspiro[5.5]undecane-3,3-diyldimethanol (diol 6)1, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl trifluoroacetate2, and 5-azido pentanone (azide 11)3 were synthesized according to literature procedure. Ethanol was purchased from Gold Shield. Solvents were of reagent grade and used as without further purification except as follows: N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dichloromethane (DCM), and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were degassed and then passed through anhydrous neutral alumina A-2 before use, according to the procedure described by Grubbs.4 Methanol was dried over activated 3 Å molecular sieves prior to use. Triethylamine was distilled over calcium hydride and stored over activated 3 Å molecular sieves prior to use. Diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) was distilled over calcium hydride prior to use. Trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and trimethylsilyl triflate (TMSOTf) were distilled prior to use. Reported reaction temperatures refer to the temperature of the heating medium. Reactions were performed in flame- or oven-dried glassware under an atmosphere of dry argon using standard Schlenk techniques unless otherwise noted. Room temperature (rt) refers to 25±3° C. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using EMD Chemicals Inc. silica gel 60 F256 plates. Flash chromatography was performed using Ultra Pure SiliaFlash P60, 230-400 mesh (40-63 μm) silica gel (SiO2) following the general procedure by Still and co-workers.5
Proton NMR spectra measurements were acquired at 500 MHz and 600 MHz. Carbon NMR spectra were obtained at 125 MHz. Proton NMR chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) and referenced to the residual solvent peak at 7.27 ppm for deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) and 2.50 for deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6). Carbon NMR chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm and referenced to the residual solvent peak at 77.23 ppm for deuterated chloroform and 39.52 for deuterated dimethylsulfoxide.6 NMR data are reported in the following manner: chemical shift, multiplicity, (s=singlet, d=doublet, t=triplet, q=quartet, quin=quintet, m=multiplet, br=broad, app=apparent), coupling constants (J) in hertz (Hz), and integration. High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) accurate mass experiments were performed by the University of California, Irvine mass spectrometry laboratory.
NHS ester 14 (1.21 g, 2.00 mmol) was dissolved in CHCl3 (40 mL), and the reaction mixture was cooled to 0° C. A solution of m-CPBA (0.905 g, 77% mixture with the remainder water, 4.03 mmol) in CHCl3 (40 mL) was added drop-wise and the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with CHCl3 (100 mL), and then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (3×125 mL). The CHCl3 layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated to afford bis-sulfoxide 3 as a white solid and mixture of diastereomers (1.13 g, 89%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.98-3.79 (m, 4H), 3.35 (appar. t, 2H, J=6.8 Hz), 3.29-2.98 (m, 12H), 2.82 (s, 8H), 1.76-1.56 (m, 4H), 1.36 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.10, 170.08, 167.78, 167.76, 99.18, 99.06, 79.19 (residual CHCl3), 65.82, 65.4, 65.0, 64.68, 55.03, 54.75, 54.62, 50.82, 46.11, 46.02, 45.73, 45.67, 40.02, 36.43, 36.31, 34.66, 34.60, 25.48, 25.25, 23.21, 23.18, 23.08, 23.04, 22.66, 20.12, 20.06; IR (KBr) 2931, 2850, 2098, 1782, 1739, 1624 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C24H33N5O12S2Na [M+Na]+ 670.1465, found 670.1450.
NHS ester 21 (1.82 g, 3.11 mmol) was dissolved in CHCl3 (105 mL), and the solution was cooled to 0° C. Next m-CPBA (1.40 g, 77% mixture with the remainder water, 6.24 mmol) was dissolved in CHCl3 (56.5 mL), then was added drop-wise, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with CHCl3 (175 mL), and then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (5×40 mL). The CHCl3 layer was collected, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated to afford 4 as a white solid and mixture of diastereomers (1.88 g, 98%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 4.01-3.79 (m, 4H), 3.32, (s, 1H), 3.29-2.97 (m, 10H), 2.82 (s, 8H), 2.75 (s, 1H), 2.26-2.19 (m, 2H), 1.94-1.85 (m, 3H), 1.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.1, 167.8, 98.46, 98.36, 84.40, 79.19 (residual CHCl3), 71.03, 65.8, 65.3, 65.0, 64.59, 55.1, 54.7, 54.5, 46.00, 45.69, 45.63, 40.12, 40.02, 36.7, 36.37, 36.27, 25.46, 23.20, 23.15, 23.07, 23.01, 19.81, 12.28; IR (thin film) 3294, 2989, 2934, 2877, 2117, 1813, 1782, 1736, 1427, 1365, 1207, 1134, 1088, 1068. 1034 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H32N2O12S2 [M+Na]+ 639.1295, found 639.1295.
Diol 6 (30.18 g, 139.5 mmol)1 was dissolved in DMF (420 mL), and triethylamine (78 mL, 560 mmol) was added via syringe. At 0° C., methanesulfonyl chloride (30.0 mL, 388 mmol) was added drop-wise via addition funnel. The solution was gradually warmed to rt, and stirred for 24 h. More DMF (240 mL), triethylamine (38 mL, 270 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (11 mL, 140 mmol) were added at rt and the mixture was stirred another 24 h. The reaction mixture was filtered and the filter cake was rinsed with EtOAc (3×100 mL). Additional EtOAc (500 mL) was added, and the solution was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (150 mL). The aqueous layer was back extracted with EtOAc (150 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2×150 mL), water (3×100 mL), and brine (150 mL). The EtOAc layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The crude brown oil was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and concentrated repeatedly until a red solid formed. The red solid was scraped out of the flask and chopped into a fine powder at which point the appearance changed to a light yellow solid. The yellow solid was stirred in 900 mL boiling ether, 125 mL CH2Cl2 was slowly added while maintaining a boil and then filtered hot. The clear yellow filtrate was boiled down to 600 mL and then hexanes (100 mL) were added slowly while maintaining a boil. The solution was further boiled down to 600 mL, allowed to cool to room temperature then placed in a freezer overnight. The resulting crystals were filtered, washed 3 times with cold hexanes and dried under high vacuum to afford 7 as off-white long needle shaped crystals (32.17 g, 62%). The mother liquors and hot-filtration materials were purified by column chromatography (step-gradient from 6:4 hexanes:EtOAc to 1:2 hexanes:EtOAc) to afford additional 7 as off-white crystals (15.57 g, 30%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.28 (s, 4H), 3.79 (s, 4H), 3.07 (s, 6H), 1.76-1.66 (m, 4H), 1.51-1.44 (m, 4H), 1.45-1.41 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 99.4, 68.0, 60.8, 38.4, 37.4, 32.5, 25.6, 22.6; IR (KBr pellet) 2943, 2862, 1354 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C13H24O8S2Na [M+Na]+ 395.0810, found 395.0801.
Mesylate 7 (6.38 g, 17.1 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (90 mL). Potassium thioacetate (7.85 g, 68.7 mmol) was added at room temp and the solution was heated to 55° C. for 48 h. The precipitates were filtered off, washed with excess EtOAc, and the filtrate was concentrated to dryness. The red crystalline solid was recrystallized from hexanes (9.82 g in 500 mL) after hot filtration the solution was brought back to a boil (total volume 375 mL). The solution was cooled, placed in the freezer overnight, filtered, and washed with cold hexanes affording 8 as off-white small crystals (3.95 g, 69%). The mother liquors and hot-filtration materials were purified by column chromatography (9:1 hexanes:EtOAc) to afford additional 8 as an off-white solid (1.14 g, 20%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDC13) 6 3.65 (s, 4H), 3.09 (s, 4H), 2.37 (s, 6H), 1.75-1.67 (m, 4H), 1.58 (H2O), 1.52-1.44 (m, 4H), 1.40 (app d, J=4.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDC13) 6 195.1, 98.7, 65.3, 37.3, 32.6, 31.8, 30.9, 25.80, 22.70; IR (KBr pellet) 2927, 2866, 1693, 1446 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C15H24O4S2Na [M+Na]+ 355.1014, found 355.1020.
Thioacetate 8 (3.95 g, 11.9 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (300 mL), and triethylamine (8.5 mL, 61 mmol) was added. Methyl acrylate (3.20 mL, 36 mmol) was added dropwise via syringe and the solution was stirred at room temp for 6 h. The solution was concentrated, dissolved in CH2Cl2, and concentrated to dryness to afford 9 as a clear light brown oil (4.90 g, 98%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.73 (s, 4H), 3.71 (s, 6H), 2.82 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 4H), 2.74 (s, 4H), 2.64 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 4H), 1.74 (br s, 4H), 1.51 (t, J=5.4 Hz, 4H), 1.41 (app d, J=4.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.5, 98.6, 65.5, 52.0, 38.4, 36.0, 34.9, 32.8, 29.1, 25.8, 22.7; IR (neat) 2947, 2862, 1739, 1439 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C19H32O6S2Na [M+Na]+ 443.1538, found 443.1522.
In(OTf)3 Procedure: Ketal 9 (0.202 g, 0.482 mmol) was placed in a microwave tube followed by In(OTf)3 (0.0079 g, 0.014 mmol), MeOH (1.9 mL), and H2O (433 mL, 24.0 mmol). The solution was placed in a microwave reactor and heated to 70° C. at 50 psi for 30 min. The solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography: The solution was concentrated, redissolved in a minimal amount of CDCl3 and loaded onto a silica gel column of 1.8 cm O.D. packed 12 cm high with a slurry of 20 mL silica in 3:1 Hexanes:EtOAc, and eluted with 100 mL 3:1, 50 mL 2:1, 50 mL 1:1, 100 mL 1:2, 100 mL 1:3 hexanes:EtOAc. After collecting 10 mL fractions; fractions 4-8 were concentrated to afford to afford starting material 9 (0.0175 g, 8.6%) and fractions 24-38 were concentrated to afford 10 as a clear yellow oil (0.140 g, 86%). Characterization data were identical to that of the products using the DOWEX procedure below.
DOWEX Procedure: Ketal 9 (5.07 g, 12.05 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (150 mL), and DOWEX 50WX8-100 resin (35 g) was added to the solution. After stirring vigorously for 18 h, the reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude oil was purified by column chromatography: A column of 5 cm O.D. packed 16 cm high with a slurry of 200 mL silica was loaded with the crude oil and eluted using 600 mL 3:1, 250 mL 7:3, 250 mL 6:4, 250 mL 1:1, 500 mL 1:2, 250 mL 7:3, 250 mL 8:2 hexanes:EtOAc to afford starting material 9 (0.720 g, 14%) and 10 as a clear yellow oil (2.76 g, 67%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.72 (s, 6H), 3.67 (d, J=5.7 Hz, 4H), 2.83 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 4H), 2.69 (s, 4H) 2.65 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 4H), 2.39 (br s, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.7, 66.1, 52.1, 44.9, 35.1, 34.8, 28.8; IR (neat) 3483, 2924, 1732, 1435 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C13H24O6S2Na [M+Na]+ 363.0192, found 363.0904.
Alkylation Procedure from Diol 15: To a three-necked round bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, a water-cooled condenser, and an argon inlet was added diol 15 (22.0 mL, 197.7 mmol), thiol 16 (17.3 g, 65.9 mmol), potassium carbonate (18.2 g, 131.8 mmol), and DMF (330 mL). The mixture was heated to 40° C. for 24 h, after which the DMF was removed directly from the vessel by vacuum distillation affording diol 10 as a clear colorless oil (22.4 g). Purification of a small sample by column chromatography produced diol 10 in a 75% yield. Characterization data were identical to that of the product using the DOWEX procedure above.
Dean-Stark Procedure: Diol 10 (4.58 g, 13.5 mmol) was dissolved in benzene (120 mL). 5-Azido pentanone3 (11) (1.77 g, 13.9 mmol) and CSA (0.314 g, 1.35 mmol) were added to the solution, a Dean-Stark apparatus was attached, and the reaction mixture was heated to 115° C. After 21 h, the reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with EtOAc and partitioned between EtOAc (250 mL) and NaHCO3 (125 mL). The EtOAc layer was separated, washed with brine (75 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The crude brown oil was purified by column chromatography: A 6 cm O.D. column packed 15 cm high with 325 mL silica slurry was loaded with the crude product in minimal CH2Cl2, eluting 750 mL 4:1, 1000 mL 3:1, 500 mL 7:3 hexanes:ethyl acetate and collecting 125-200 mL fractions. Fractions 8-15 were concentrated affording 12 as a clear light yellow oil (4.78 g, 79%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.78 (d, J=11.9 Hz, 2H), 3.74-3.70 (m, 8H), 3.32 (app t, J=3.4 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 4H), 2.80 (J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.67-2.57 (m, 6H), 1.76-1.73 (m, 4H), 1.39 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.4, 99.4, 66.02, 52.0, 51.74, 38.1, 36.0, 35.8, 35.0, 34.9, 29.1, 29.0, 23.1, 20.1; IR (neat) 2954, 2870, 2098, 1739, 1435; cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C18H31N3O6S2Na [M+Na]+ 472.1552, found 472.1556.
Noyori Procedure:7 To a stirred solution of crude diol 10 from the alkylation procedure (0.756 g, 2.23 mmol) and imidazole (1.04 g, 15.3 mmol) in DMF (28 mL) was added TMSCl (1 M solution in THF, 12.6 mL) resulting in the formation of a yellow solution. After stirring for 12 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with water (150 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3×150 mL). The combined organic portions were washed with water (3×150 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude TMS ether as an orange oil which was used immediately without further purification: 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.71-3.67 (m, 10H), 2.78 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 4H), 2.61 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 4H), 2.57 (s, 4H), 0.08 (s, 18H).
To a cooled (−78° C.) solution of the crude TMS ether (1.00 g, 2.06 mmol) and azide 113 (0.262 g, 2.06 mmol) was added TMS-OTf (50 μL, 0.1 mmol). The solution was stirred for 12 h, over which the time gradually warmed to room temperature. The reaction was quenched with two drops of pyridine (ca. 100 μL), and the mixture was diluted in ethyl acetate (100 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (2×100 mL) and brine (100 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give crude 12 as a black oil. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:3 ethyl acetate:hexanes) to afford 12 as an orange oil (0.651 g, 65% over three steps). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were consistent with those previously reported above.
Azide 12 (4.65 g, 10.3 mmol) was dissolved in 4:1 THF:H2O (67 mL), and LiOH.H2O (0.913 g, 21.8 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture. After 1 h, additional LiOH.H2O (0.913 g, 21.8 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 2 h and partitioned between H2O (50 mL) and hexanes (50 mL). The aqueous layer was acidified to pH 1 with 6 M HCl and extracted with EtOAc (5×25 mL). The combined EtOAc extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated to afford 13 as a clear, light yellow oil (4.58 g, quant.): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.12 (br s, 2H), 3.78-3.69 (m, 4H), 3.29 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.83-2.76 (m, 6H), 2.67 (dt, J=12.0, 7.1 Hz, 4H), 2.60 (s, 2H), 1.73 (s, 4H), 1.33 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.0, 177.9, 99.5, 65.9, 51.6, 38.1, 35.8, 35.6, 34.9, 34.8, 28.6, 28.57, 23.0, 20.0; IR (neat) 3097, 2989, 2098, 1712, 1412 cm−1; HRMS (ES/MeOH) m/z calcd for C16H27N3O6S2Na [M+Na]+ 444.1239, found 444.1244.
EDC Method: Diacid 13 (2.16 g, 5.12 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (52 mL), and N-hydroxysuccinimide was added (1.413 g, 12.3 mmol). 1-Ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI.HCl) (2.360 g, 12.3 mmol) was added followed by triethylamine (0.10 mL, 0.71 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 13 h. The reaction solution was concentrated by half, diluted with EtOAc (50 mL) then washed with sat. ammonium chloride (2×25 mL), sat. NaHCO3 (2×25 mL), water (2×25 mL), and brine (25 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The crude oil was purified by column chromatography by loading onto a column 3.5 cm O.D packed 13 cm high with 100 mL silica slurry in 1:1 hexanes:EtOAc, eluting with 325 mL 1:1, 600 mL 1:2, 200 mL 1:3 hexanes:EtOAc and collecting 175 mL followed by 27 mL fractions. Fractions 9-29 were concentrated affording 14 as a white solid (1.97 g, 62%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.79 (d, J=11.9 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (d, J=11.9 Hz, 2H) 3.32 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.00-2.78 (m, 18H), 2.66 (s, 2H), 2.05 (acetone), 1.71 (br s, 4H), 1.40 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.23, 169.20, 167.3, 99.57, 66.0, 51.76, 38.17, 36.05, 35.89, 35.70, 32.34, 32.25, 28.31, 25.80, 25.56, 23.18, 20.01; IR (KBr) 2931, 2850, 2098, 1782, 1739, 1624 cm−1; LRMS (ES/MeOH) m/z calcd for C24H33N5O10S2Na [M+Na]+ 638.2, found 638.3.
TFAA Method: To a cooled (0° C.) solution of diacid 13, (2.45 g, 5.81 mmol), N-hydroxysuccinimide (2.68 g, 23.3 mmol), and DIPEA (8.10 mL, 46.4 mmol) in DMF (30 mL) was added TFAA (3.28 mL, 23.3 mmol) dropwise, slowly. The light orange solution was stirred at 0° C. for 3 h, after which the reaction was determined complete by TLC. The reaction mixture was partitioned between ethyl acetate (125 mL) and hydrochloric acid (1 M, 100 mL). The layers were separated, after which the acidic aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2×125 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with sodium bicarbonate solution (1 M, 3×100 mL), water (100 mL), and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated to a dark oil which was purified by column chromatography (step-gradient from 1:1 hexanes:EtOAc to 1:3 hexanes:EtOAc) affording 14 as a white solid (2.34 g, 66%). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were consistent with those previously reported above.
Diol 10 (2.21 g, 6.48 mmol) was dissolved in benzene (45 mL). 1-Hexyne-5-one (1.33 g, 13.8 mmol) and CSA (0.152 g, 0.654 mmol) were added to the solution, a Dean-Stark apparatus was attached, and the reaction mixture was heated to 115° C. After 27 h, the reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with EtOAc and partitioned between EtOAc (25 mL) and NaHCO3 (125 mL). The EtOAc layer was separated, washed with brine (25 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The crude brown oil was purified by column chromatography using a column 6 cm O.D. packed 15 cm high with 300 mL silica slurried in 4:1 Hexanes:EtOAc. The crude was loaded after dissolution in minimal CH2Cl2 and the column was eluted with 250 mL 4:1, 1000 mL 3:1, 500 mL 7:3, 100 mL 65:35 hexanes:EtOAc. After collecting 2×200 mL fractions and 25×100 mL fractions, fractions 8-15 were concentrated affording 19 as a clear light yellow oil (2.08 g, 77%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.76 (d, J=12.0, 2H), 3.71 (s, 6H), 3.70 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 2H), 2.86-2.77 (m, 6H), 2.66-2.59 (m, 6H), 2.33 (ddd, J=8.2, 6.7, 2.7 Hz, 2H), 1.98-1.93 (m, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.40, 172.37, 98.8, 84.5, 68.3, 66.0, 52.0, 38.1, 37.7, 35.9, 35.8, 35.0, 34.9, 29.10, 29.08, 20.1, 12.9; IR (thin film) 3286, 2993, 2951, 2870, 2117, 1739, 1439, 1362, 1250, 1200, 1173, 1134, 1057, 1034; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C19H30O6S2 [M+Na]+ 441.1382, found 441.1374.
Dimethyl ester 19 (0.362 g, 0.864 mmol) was dissolved in 4:1 THF:H2O (8.0 mL), and LiOH.H2O (0.125 g, 2.98 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture. After 1 h, additional LiOH.H2O (0.058 g, 1.38 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 2 h and partitioned between H2O (50 mL) and hexanes (50 mL). The aqueous layer was acidified to pH 1 with 6 M HCl and extracted with EtOAc (5×5 mL). The combined EtOAc extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated, dissolved in CH2Cl2 and concentrated repeatedly to afford 0.380 g of a light yellow oil, which was used immediately without any further purification: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.20 (br s, 2H), 3.72 (q, 4H, J=9.1 Hz), 2.88-2.76 (m, 6H), 2.73-2.60 (m, 6H), 2.32 (dt, 2H, J=7.9, 2.8 Hz), 1.99-1.90 (m, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H).
To a portion of the crude diacid intermediate (0.180 g, 0.461 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.6 mL) and pyridine (0.30 mL, 3.7 mmol) was added N-hydroxysuccinimidyl trifluoroacetate (0.620 g, 2.94 mmol) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The solution was diluted with CH2C12, poured into a separatory funnel, washed with sat. NH4Cl (5 mL), sat. NaHCO3 (5 mL), water (5 mL), and brine (5 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The crude product was chromatographed using a column 1.8 cm O.D. packed 12 cm high with a slurry of 20 mL silica and eluting 380 mL 1:2 hexanes:ethyl acetate. After collecting 70 mL followed by 10 mL fractions, fractions 1-13 were concentrated to afford 20 as a white solid (0.162 g, 60%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.30 (CH2Cl2), 3.78 (d, J=12.0 Hz, 2H), 3.71 (d, J=12.5 Hz, 2H), 3.01-2.79 (m, 18H), 2.68 (s, 2H), 2.31 (ddd, J=9.7, 7.6, 2.6 Hz, 2H), 2.00-1.93 (m, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.2, 167.3, 98.9, 84.6, 68.3, 66.0, 38.1, 37.4, 35.8, 35.7, 32.3, 32.2, 28.32, 28.26, 25.8, 20.2, 12.9; IR (thin film) 3282, 2947, 2870, 2252, 2114, 1813, 1786, 1739, 1431, 1369, 1250, 1207, 1134, 1068 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H32N2O10S2 [M+Na]+ 607.1396, found 607.1388.
Synthetic peptide Ac-myelin was cross-linked with Azide-A-DSBSO in DMSO in a 1:1 molar ratio of peptide to cross-linker at 1 mM in the presence of 1 eq of diisopropylethylamine. Cross-linked peptide solutions were then diluted to 5 pmol/μL in a 3% CAN and 2% formic acid aqueous solution for liquid chromatography multistage tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSn) analysis.
Bovine cytochrome C was solubilized in 50 mM pH 8.0 phosphate buffer at 200 μM and reacted with 20 mM Azide-A-DSBSO dissolved in DMSO at a 1:10 molar ratio of protein to cross-linker for 1 hr at RT. The reaction was quenched with 500 mM NH4HCO3 and ultracentrifuged on a 10 kDa NMWL Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters to remove excess cross-linker. To establish the most efficient conditions for biotin conjugation, cross-linked products were washed and concentrated to 450 μM on filter in either 50 mM phosphate buffer or 8 M urea lysis buffer. Various amounts of BARAC were then reacted with the cross-linked cytochrome C in either phosphate or lysis buffer with agitation overnight. The reaction efficiency for each condition was evaluated by immunoblotting, with subsequent experiments carried out in optimal conditions: urea lysis buffer with 100 μM BARAC and agitation overnight. Following conjugation, excess BARAC was removed by ultracentrifugation and washed with 25 mM NH4HCO3. Biotin-conjugated cytochrome C was incubated with high-capacity Streptavidin beads and then digested on-bead with 1% trypsin (w/w) or 5% chymotrypsin (w/w) following reduction and alkylation of cysteine residues in 5 mM DTT at 56° C. and 10 mM chloroacetamide at RT, respectively. After digestion, non-cross-linked peptides were extracted and analyzed by LC-MSn; cross-linked peptides bound to streptavidin beads were eluted from beads by acid cleavage in 20% FA, 10% ACN solution prior to LC-MSn analysis.
Most of the enriched cross-linked peptides were analyzed by LC-MSn using an LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, Calif.) coupled on-line with either an Eksigent NanoLC system (Dublin, Calif.), or EASY-nLC-1000 (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, Calif.). A few of cross-linked samples from intact cells were analyzed using an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (courtesy of Thermo Scientific Demo Lab, San Jose, Calif.) coupled on-line with an EASY-nLC 1000 (Thermo Scientific). LC/MSn data acquisition and analysis were as described.8 Only ions with 3+ or higher in the MS 1 scan were selected for MS2 analysis.
Due to the similarity between DSBSO and DSSO, the general data analysis workflow for the identification of DSBSO inter-linked peptides by LC/MSn is the same as the analysis of DSSO cross-linked peptides.8,9 Using the Batch-Tag software within a developmental version of Protein Prospector (v5.10.10, University of California San Francisco), MS2 and MS3 spectra were searched against a decoy database consisting of a normal Swissprot database concatenated with its randomized version (SwissProt.2013.3.1.random.concat with a total of 454,402 protein entries). The mass tolerances for parent ions and fragment ions were set as ±20 ppm and 0.6 Da respectively. Trypsin was set as the enzyme with three maximum missed cleavages allowed. Cysteine carbamidomethylation was set as a constant modification. Protein N-terminal acetylation, asparagine deamidation, N-terminal conversion of glutamine to pyroglutamic acid, and methionine oxidation were selected as variable modifications. Similar to DSSO cross-linked peptides, DSBSO cross-linked peptides display unique and characteristic MS2 fragmentation patterns corresponding to their cross-linking types. Therefore, three additional defined modifications on uncleaved lysines and free protein N-terminus were chosen: alkene (C3H2O, +54 Da), sulfenic acid (C3H4O2S, +254 Da), and unsaturated thiol (C3H2SO, +236 Da). These are modifications resulting from CID-induced cleavage of the DSBSO cross-linked peptides. The in-house program Link-Hunter is a revised version of the previously written Link-Finder program, designed to automatically validate and summarize cross-linked peptides based MSn data and database searching results as previously described.8,9 In addition to checking MS2 spectra for predicted patterns, Link-Hunter automatically correlates sequence data from MS3 to MS2 and MS1 parent masses, reports identified inter-linked peptides with two associated sequences.
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are fundamental to the structure and function of protein complexes. Resolving the physical contacts between proteins as they occur in cells is critical to uncovering the molecular details underlying various cellular activities. To advance the study of PPIs in living cells, in some embodiments, a new in vivo cross-linking mass spectrometry platform that couples a novel membrane-permeable, enrichable, and MS-cleavable cross-linker with multistage tandem mass spectrometry is provided. In some embodiments, this strategy permits the effective capture, enrichment, and identification of in vivo cross-linked products from mammalian cells and thus enables the determination of protein interaction interfaces. In some embodiments, the utility of the developed method has been demonstrated by profiling PPIs in mammalian cells at the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level. In some embodiments, a general approach for studying in vivo PPIs is disclosed. Also provided is a solid foundation for future studies toward the complete mapping of PPI networks in living systems.
In some embodiments, a new and general XL-MS workflow based on Azide-A-DSBSO for studying PPIs in living cells is provided. This new XL-MS workflow differs from existing approaches by its collective abilities allowing (i) effective protein cross-linking in vivo to capture authentic protein interactions, (ii) selective enrichment of cross-linked proteins and peptides to improve their detection, (iii) simplified and unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides by MSn, and (iv) direct coupling with affinity purification of in vivo cross-linked protein complexes to study their interactions.
In comparison to existing reagents for in vivo studies (24), the integration of several unique features (i.e. small size, proper spacer length, bio-orthogonal affinity handle, robust MS-cleavable bonds, and acid cleavage site) makes Azide-A-DSBSO a much more attractive reagent for defining protein-protein interactions in cells.
Apart from mapping PPIs at the proteome level, successful coupling was achieved of Azide-A-DSBSO-based XL-MS strategy with HB-tag-based affinity purification to delineate the in vivo subunit connectivity of human proteasome complexes for the first time. In some embodiments, this work expands the utility of previously developed cross-linking methodologies such as the QTAX (quantitative analysis of tandem affinity purified in vivo cross-linked (x) protein complexes) strategy in studying in vivo interaction networks of protein complexes beyond the identification of interacting partners (12, 13).
Interestingly, seven out of eight identified pair-wise interactions corroborated well with previous in vitro XL-MS studies of yeast proteasome complexes (19, 20, 36), suggesting that interaction similarity exists between orthologs as well as between in vivo and in vitro proteasome structures.
In this work, the close association between Rpt3 and Rpt6 through the identification of two interlinked peptides at their N-terminal (Rpt3:K80-Rpt6:K55) and central (Rpt3:K238-Rpt6:K222) regions was further confirmed. In addition, the identified contacts between the N termini of Rpt6 and Rpn11, as well as Rpn2, correlate with the electron microscopy structures of yeast proteasomes in which the N-terminal sequences of Rpt3 and Rpt6 form a coil structure for Rpn2 and the lid subcomplex to attach to the base (50, 51).
Moreover, a novel interaction between a3 and Rpt6 identified here implies the intimate relationship of Rpt6 and the 20S α ring. It is worth noting that the identification of these in vivo proteasome subunit contacts was possible only when HB-based affinity purification was incorporated into the workflow, indicating the necessity of targeted analysis for profiling PPIs of protein complexes in cells.
Importantly, our results have proven the feasibility of the Azide-A-DSBSO based XL-MS strategy for such targeted analysis, demonstrating a unique capability that current strategies do not possess. Although other proteasome components were captured and identified from affinity purified Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked Rpn11-HB or HB-Rpt6 containing proteasome complexes (data not shown), it appears that direct interactions of protein baits are enriched, as eight of the interactions identified were directly with Rpt6.
Although additional baits would be needed to generate a more comprehensive in vivo subunit topology map of the proteasome complex, this would be advantageous when only the direct binding partner needs to be identified. Collectively, this work represents a significant step toward a full understanding of the in vivo PPIs of protein complexes.
Thus, in some embodiments, successful development was achieved of a new, versatile, and general XL-MS workflow for mapping PPIs at both the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level, representing a technological advancement in defining protein interactions in living systems.
In comparison to previous AP-MS and quantitative tandem affinity purification studies relying on multiple reciprocal purifications and/or existing PPI databases for interaction validation and the construction of in silico interaction network maps (2, 13, 14, 52), our new in vivo XL-MS strategy allows the identification of direct protein interaction contacts for generating interaction networks experimentally.
In addition, this information can be used for determining protein structural topologies in future studies. In combination with stable isotope labeling (53) and cross-linking chemistry targeting other residues such as acidic residues (54), new reagents can be further developed to describe PPI dynamics in cells. The potential of this technology is enormous, and with improvements in instrumentation and sample preparation, a vast variety of unexplored biological applications can be envisioned.
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs)1 play a key role in defining protein functions in biological systems. Aberrant PPIs can have drastic effects on biochemical activities essential to cell homeostasis, growth, and proliferation, and thereby lead to various human diseases (1). Consequently, PPI interfaces have been recognized as a new paradigm for drug development. Therefore, mapping PPIs and their interaction interfaces in living cells is critical not only for a comprehensive understanding of protein function and regulation, but also for describing the molecular mechanisms underlying human pathologies and identifying potential targets for better therapeutics.
Several strategies exist for identifying and mapping PPIs, including yeast two-hybrid, protein microarray, and affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) (2-5). Thanks to new developments in sample preparation strategies, mass spectrometry technologies, and bioinformatics tools, AP-MS has become a powerful and preferred method for studying PPIs at the systems level (6-9). Unlike other approaches, AP-MS experiments allow the capture of protein interactions directly from their natural cellular environment, thus better retaining native protein structures and biologically relevant interactions. In addition, a broader scope of PPI networks can be obtained with greater sensitivity, accuracy, versatility, and speed. Despite the success of this very promising technique, AP-MS experiments can lead to the loss of weak/transient interactions and/or the reorganization of protein interactions during biochemical manipulation under native purification conditions. To circumvent these problems, in vivo chemical cross-linking has been successfully employed to stabilize protein interactions in native cells or tissues prior to cell lysis (10-16).
The resulting covalent bonds formed between interacting partners allow affinity purification under stringent and fully denaturing conditions, consequently reducing nonspecific background while preserving stable and weak/transient interactions (12-16). Subsequent mass spectrometric analysis can reveal not only the identities of interacting proteins, but also cross-linked amino acid residues. The latter provides direct molecular evidence describing the physical contacts between and within proteins (17).
This information can be used for computational modeling to establish structural topologies of proteins and protein complexes (17-22), as well as for generating experimentally derived protein interaction network topology maps (23, 24). Thus, cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) strategies represent a powerful and emergent technology that possesses unparalleled capabilities for studying PPIs.
Despite their great potential, current XL-MS studies that have aimed to identify cross-linked peptides have been mostly limited to in vitro cross-linking experiments, with few successfully identifying protein interaction interfaces in living cells (24, 25). This is largely because XL-MS studies remain challenging due to the inherent difficulty in the effective MS detection and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides, as well as in unambiguous assignment of cross-linked residues. In general, cross-linked products are heterogeneous and low in abundance relative to non-cross-linked products. In addition, their MS fragmentation is too complex to be interpreted using conventional database searching tools (17, 26). It is noted that almost all of the current in vivo PPI studies utilize formaldehyde cross-linking because of its membrane permeability and fast kinetics (10-16). However, in comparison to the most commonly used amine reactive NHS ester cross-linkers, identification of formaldehyde cross-linked peptides is even more challenging because of its promiscuous nonspecific reactivity and extremely short spacer length (27). Therefore, further developments in reagents and methods are urgently needed to enable simple MS detection and effective identification of in vivo cross-linked products, and thus allow the mapping of authentic protein contact sites as established in cells, especially for protein complexes.
Various efforts have been made to address the limitations of XL-MS studies, resulting in new developments in bioinformatics tools for improved data interpretation (28-32) and new designs of cross-linking reagents for enhanced MS analysis of cross-linked peptides (24, 33-39). Among these approaches, the development of new cross-linking reagents holds great promise for mapping PPIs on the systems level. One class of cross-linking reagents containing an enrichment handle have been shown to allow selective isolation of cross-linked products from complex mixtures, boosting their detectability by MS (33-35, 40-42). A second class of cross-linkers containing MS-cleavable bonds have proven to be effective in facilitating the unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides (36-39, 43, 44), as the resulting cross-linked products can be identified based on their characteristic and simplified fragmentation behavior during MS analysis. Therefore, an ideal cross-linking reagent would possess the combined features of both classes of cross-linkers. To advance the study of in vivo PPIs, a new XL-MS platform based on a novel membrane-permeable, enrichable, and MS-cleavable cross-linker, Azide-A-DSBSO (azide-tagged, acid-cleavable disuccinimidyl bis-sulfoxide), and multistage tandem mass spectrometry (MSn) was developed. This new XL-MS strategy has been successfully employed to map in vivo PPIs from mammalian cells at both the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level.
In order to establish a robust in vivo XL-MS workflow, in some embodiments, the design and synthesis of a novel cross-linking reagent, Azide-A-DSBSO is provided (
Bovine cytochrome C (>95% purity) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Amicon Ultra 100-kDa, 30-kDa, and 10-kDa NMWL centrifugal filters were purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, Mass.). LaminA/C antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, Mass.). Calnexin and GAPDH antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Tex.). Streptavidin agarose resin, high-capacity streptavidin agarose resin, HRP-conjugated streptavidin, and Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, Ill.). Sequencing-grade trypsin was purchased from Promega Corp. (Madison, Wis.). Endoproteinase Lys-C was purchased from WAKO Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). TPCK-treated trypsin was purchased from Worthington Biochemical Corp (Lakewood, N.J.). All other general chemicals for buffers and culture media were purchased from Fisher Scientific or VWR International (Radnor, Pa.).
The synthesis and characterization of the Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linker are described in Ref. 55. The simplified scheme is depicted in
In some embodiments, there are nine steps in the general Azide-A-DSBSO-based XL-MS workflow for mapping in vivo PPIs in mammalian cells illustrated in
In addition to mapping PPIs in cells at the proteome scale, in some embodiments, the same strategy can be modified to study in vivo PPIs of protein complexes (
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting Analysis was performed by separating protein samples via SDS-PAGE and either stained using Coomassie Blue or transferred to a PVDF membrane and analyzed via immunoblotting. Biotin-conjugated proteins and HB-tagged proteins were detected by streptavidin-HRP conjugate. Cross-linked and non-cross-linked Rpn11-HB and HB-Rpt6 were also detected with streptavidin-HRP conjugate. Lamin A/C, calnexin, and GAPDH were detected using specific primary antibodies and either rabbit or mouse secondary HRP-conjugated antibody. Biotin-conjugated peptides were blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane and detected with streptavidin-HRP conjugate.
One of the key steps in the Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linking strategy is the selective enrichment of cross-linked products. This is achieved by incorporating an affinity tag (e.g. biotin tag) to Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked products through azide-based conjugation chemistry. Although both copper-catalyzed click chemistry and Staudinger ligation were effective, they have proven to be technically challenging (35). In order to develop a more robust methodology, a copper-free click chemistry reaction using a biotin-tagged strained alkyne BARAC was adopted (47). The tests using Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked standard protein cytochrome C showed that copper-free conjugation was efficient in both phosphate buffer and buffers containing 8 m urea (
In vitro cross-linking, biotin conjugation, and enrichment of azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked cytochrome C was performed by azide-A-DSBSO cross-linking of bovine cytochrome C was similar to that described elsewhere (35). The reaction was quenched with 500 mm NH4HCO3, and samples were ultracentrifuged on 10-kDa NMWL Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters to remove excess cross-linker. Various amounts of BARAC were then reacted with the cross-linked cytochrome C in either phosphate or 8 m urea lysis buffer with agitation overnight. The reaction efficiency for each condition was evaluated via immunoblotting. Following conjugation, excess BARAC was removed by ultracentrifugation and washed with 25 mm NH4HCO3. Biotin-conjugated cytochrome C was purified through binding to streptavidin beads (15).
As described above, LC-MSn analysis was performed on the acid-cleaved products of Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked peptides (i.e. DSBSO cross-linked peptides) (
As shown, the cleavage of either of the two MS-cleavable C—S bonds during MS2 analysis leads to the physical separation of the two DSBSO cross-linked peptide constituents, α and β, yielding two characteristic fragment ion pairs (i.e. αA/βT and αT/βA) (
In addition to MS2 and MS3 data, the MS 1 parent ion information is used to further confirm the identities of cross-linked peptides by matching their measured peptide masses to the theoretical masses of predicted cross-linked peptides (
Profiling PPIs from Intact HEK 293 Cells
In Vivo Azide-A-DSBSO Cross-linking of HEK 293 Cells was performed by growing HEK 293 cells on DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were grown to 80% confluence, trypsinized, washed with PBS, and cross-linked with 2 mm Azide-A-DSBSO in PBS for 1 h with rotation at 37° C. Following quenching of cross-linking reactions by the addition of 125 mm glycine, cells were pelleted and stored at −80° C. after removal of the supernatant. Frozen cell pellets were lysed in 8 m urea lysis buffer and clarified via centrifugation (15).
In order to maximize the information acquired on protein interaction interfaces from in vivo cross-linked HEK 293 cells, three different sample preparation strategies, paths I, II, and III was explored (
Nonetheless, BARAC reactions and subsequent purification were also effective for each subcellular fraction (
From all of the samples prepared, a total of 938 proteins in our analyses (TABLE 8) were identified, 584 of which were identified with at least one cross-linker modified peptide, amounting to 4812 redundant Azide-A-DSBSO labeled peptides, including dead-end, intralinked, and interlinked peptides. Functional annotation of the 584 proteins revealed that they are localized in various cellular compartments and involved in diverse biological processes (TABLE 9), demonstrating that Azide-A-DSBSO is well suited for capturing PPIs in cells.
In some embodiments, mapping Cross-links to 2.5-Å Nucleosome Crystal Structure was performed by downloading the 2.5-Å nucleosome crystal structure (PDB 3AV1) from the Protein Data Bank, and cross-linked residues were mapped and visualized using PyMOL. Distances were measured from the amino group of lysine side chains, also using PyMOL.
Because of their unique capability for describing PPI interfaces, only interlinked peptides are provided in TABLE 10. In this work, 240 unique interlinked peptides were identified, including 136 intrasubunit and 104 intersubunit interlinks. Using this data, an in vivo PPI network map with 85 protein-protein interactions between 54 proteins was established (
It has been reported that VIME co-localizes with neurofilament proteins dynamically during neuronal differentiation, and its co-purification with NFH and NFL has been observed (49). Given the close relationship among the three neurofilament subunits NFL, NFM, and NFH, our findings corroborate well with the known function of vimentin in the development of neurofilaments. In general, identifying intermediate filament protein interactions from the native cellular environment is a major challenge, and therefore the ability to capture and directly identify not only which intermediate filament proteins interact, but at which residues, represents a major step forward in this area of research.
It is noted that the most abundant interactions identified in this work resulted from histones and structural proteins (TABLE 10), most likely attributed to their abundance as previously reported (24). In total, 118 unique cross-linked peptides among the four (H2A, H2B, H3.2, and H4) core histones were identified, with 47 from H2A-H2B, 13 from H2A-H3.2, 10 from H2B-H4, 8 from H2B-H3.2, 4 from H3.2-H4, and 1 from H2A-H4 pairs. Additionally, 35 unique intraprotein interlinked peptides were identified, with 20 from H2B, 11 from H3.2, 3 from H4, and 1 from H2A (TABLE 10). Based on the known nucleosome crystal structures (PDB 3AV1) (
In order to establish an in vivo XL-MS workflow for protein complexes (
In total, MS3 sequencing identified 119 non-redundant cross-linker modified peptides, 54 of which represent 27 unique interlinked peptides (TABLE 11 and TABLE 12). Among them, 22 unique interlinked peptides resulted from inter- or intrasubunit cross-links between known subunits of the proteasome complex, including 8 unique intersubunit (i.e. α3-Rpt6, Rpt2-Rpt6, Rpt3-Rpt6, Rpt4-Rpt6, Rpn5-Rpn6, Rpn11-Rpt6, Rpn5-Rpn9, Rpn2-Rpt6) and 11 unique intrasubunit interactions (TABLE 11 and TABLE 12). In addition to interactions between proteasome subunits, one interprotein interlink between HSPA1A and HSP8A and three intraprotein interlinked peptides from three known proteasome interacting proteins, HSPA1A, EEF2, and RPS15 were identified. In some embodiments, these results demonstrate that the new XL-MS workflow disclosed herein can be generalized to determine protein interaction interfaces of protein complexes in cells.
Azide-A-DSBSO cross-linked 293 cell lysate was reacted with varying concentrations of BARAC with agitation overnight. The resulting biotin-conjugated lysates were analyzed via SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis to determine the conjugation efficiency. Bound proteins were reduced with 2 mm tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine for 30 min at room temperature and alkylated using 50 mm chloroacetamide in the dark at room temperature for 30 min prior to overnight digestion with 2% Lys-C (w/w) at 37° C. and subsequent overnight digestion with 2% trypsin TPCK (w/w) at 37° C. The Lys-C/trypsin combination is preferred for proteins purified under fully denaturing conditions to achieve optimal digestion efficiency. Non-cross-linked peptides were extracted and analyzed directly via LC-MS/MS, whereas streptavidin-bound peptides were first acid-cleaved from beads with 20% formic acid, 20% acetonitrile overnight before LC-MSn analysis.
In vivo cross-linked proteins in 293 cell lysates were concentrated using 100-kDa NMWL Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters, and the resulting filtrates were then passed through 30-kDa NMWL Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters. Proteins remaining on both membranes were reduced with 2 mm tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine for 30 min at room temperature and then alkylated with 50 mm chloroacetamide at room temperature in the dark for 30 min prior to a 3% Lys-C (w/w) overnight digestion at 37° C. and subsequent 3% trypsin TPCK (w/w) overnight digestion at 37° C. Digests were collected via centrifugation and reacted with 100 μm BARAC at room temperature with agitation overnight. The biotin-conjugated peptides were then enriched using high-capacity streptavidin agarose resin. Bound peptides were acid-cleaved and then submitted for LC-MSn analysis.
Stable 293 cell lines expressing an HB tagged proteasome subunit (Rpn11 or Rpt6) were grown to confluence in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% Pen/strep. The cells were washed with PBS and cross-linked and quenched as described above. The cells were lysed in 8 m urea denaturing lysis buffer (15). The cleared lysates were subjected to HB-tag-based tandem affinity purification, which involved binding to Ni2+-Sepharose beads followed by binding to streptavidin resins (15). Proteins bound on beads were reduced, alkylated, and then incubated in 250 μm BARAC with rotation at room temperature overnight in 8 m urea buffer. After extensive washing, bound proteins were digested by Lys-C and trypsin (15). The peptides freed into solution during digestion were subjected to further enrichment through binding to Neutravidin resin for 1 h at room temperature, and cross-linked peptides were acid-eluted as described. The enriched cross-linked peptides were then subjected to LC-MSn analysis.
Most of the enriched cross-linked peptides were analyzed via LC-MSn using an LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, Calif.) coupled on-line with either an Eksigent NanoLC system (Dublin, Calif.) or an EASY-nLC-1000 (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, Calif.). A few cross-linked samples from intact cells were analyzed using an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (courtesy of Thermo Scientific Demo Lab, San Jose, Calif.) coupled on-line with an EASY-nLC 1000 (Thermo Scientific). LC-MSn data acquisition and analysis were as described (20). Only ions with charge of 3+ or more in the MS 1 scan were selected for MS2 analysis.
Because of the similarity between DSBSO and DSSO, the general data analysis workflow for the identification of DSBSO interlinked peptides via LC-MSn is the same as the analysis of DSSO cross-linked peptides (20, 36). Using the Batch-Tag software within a developmental version of Protein Prospector (v5.10.10, University of California San Francisco), MS2 and MS3 spectra were searched against a decoy database consisting of a normal Swiss-Prot database concatenated with its randomized version (SwissProt.2013.3.1.random.concat with a total of 454,402 protein entries). Homo sapiens was set as the species (20,501 entries) for analyzing data from human cells. The mass tolerances for parent ions and fragment ions were set as ±20 ppm and 0.6 Da, respectively. For Lys-C/trypsin digests, trypsin was set as the enzyme with a maximum of three missed cleavages allowed. Cysteine carbamidomethylation was set as a constant modification. Protein N-terminal acetylation, asparagine deamidation, N-terminal conversion of glutamine to pyroglutamic acid, and methionine oxidation were selected as variable modifications. Similar to DSSO cross-linked peptides, DSBSO cross-linked peptides display unique and characteristic MS2 fragmentation patterns corresponding to their cross-linking types. Therefore, three additional defined modifications on uncleaved lysines and free protein N termini were chosen: alkene (C3H2O, +54 Da), sulfenic acid (C3H4O2S, +254 Da), and unsaturated thiol (C3H2SO, +236 Da). These are modifications resulting from collision-induced dissociation cleavage of the DSBSO cross-linked peptides. Proteins were identified with expectation values ≦0.01 and a minimum of two unique peptides (15).
The in-house program Link-Hunter is a revised version of the previously written Link-Finder program, designed to automatically validate and summarize cross-linked peptide sequences based on MSn data and database searching results as previously described (20, 36). In addition to checking MS2 spectra for predicted patterns, Link-Hunter automatically correlates sequence data from MS3 to MS2 and MS 1 parent masses and reports identified interlinked peptides with two associated sequences.
PPI network graphs resulting from cross-links identified in this work were generated manually in Excel from the final list of identified cross-linked proteins. For comparison with known interactions, the final list of cross-linked interacting proteins was fed into an analysis pipeline that automatically extracts physical (but not genetic) interactions from BioGRID, MINT, and IntAct using their Web services (15). Both PPI networks were imported into and visualized by Cytoscape v2.8.3. Functional enrichment was performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (v.6.7) Functional Annotation Tool (46). Gene I.D.s were submitted, and the Functional Enrichment Chart with enriched Gene Ontology annotations (cellular compartment and biological processes) was downloaded. Only high-confidence functional annotations (false discovery rate <0.01) were reported.
As used herein, the section headings are for organizational purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the described subject matter in any way. All literature and similar materials cited in this application, including but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, books, treatises, and internet web pages are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety for any purpose. When definitions of terms in incorporated references appear to differ from the definitions provided in the present teachings, the definition provided in the present teachings shall control. It will be appreciated that there is an implied “about” prior to the temperatures, concentrations, times, etc discussed in the present teachings, such that slight and insubstantial deviations are within the scope of the present teachings herein.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain embodiments and examples, those skilled in the art will understand that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while several variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure.
It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with, or substituted for, one another in order to form varying modes or embodiments of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
It should be understood, however, that this detailed description, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, is given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art.
The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner. Rather, the terminology is simply being utilized in conjunction with a detailed description of embodiments of the systems, methods and related components. Furthermore, embodiments may comprise several novel features, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or is believed to be essential to practicing the inventions herein described.
This application is a Continuation-in-Part Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/927,332, filed Oct. 29, 2015, which is Continuation Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/471,365, filed May 14, 2012, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,222,943 on Dec. 29, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/486,260, filed May 14, 2011, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. This Continuation-in-Part Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/222,690, filed Sep. 23, 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. R01GM074830 awarded by the National Institutes of Health, Grant No. R21CA161807 awarded by the National Institutes of Health, and Grant No. R01GM106003 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62222690 | Sep 2015 | US | |
| 61486260 | May 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13471365 | May 2012 | US |
| Child | 14927332 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14927332 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15275001 | US |
