Patent Grant
11681733
Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
This disclosure relates to data association, attribution, annotation, and interpretation systems and related methods of efficiently organizing heterogeneous data elements associated with users at a massive scale. The systems and methods can be implemented to provide real-time access to historical data elements of users that has not previously been available.
Credit events can be collected, compiled, and analyzed to provide an individual's creditworthiness in the form of a credit report, which typically includes multiple credit attributes, such as a credit score, credit account information, and other information related to financial worthiness of users. For example, a credit score is important as it can establish necessary level of trust between transacting entities. For example, financial institutions such as lenders, credit card providers, banks, car dealers, brokers, or the like can more safely enter into a business transaction based on credit scores.
Systems and methods are disclosed related to data association, attribution, annotation, and interpretation system and related methods of efficiently organizing heterogeneous data at a massive scale.
One general aspect includes a computer system for determining account holder identities for collected event information, the computer system including: one or more hardware computer processors; and one or more storage devices configured to store software instructions configured for execution by the one or more hardware computer processors to cause the computer system to: receive, from a plurality of data sources, a plurality of event information associated with a corresponding plurality of events; for each event information: access a data store including associations between data sources and identifier parameters, the identifier parameters including at least an indication of one or more identifiers included in event information from the corresponding data source; determine, based at least on the identifier parameters of the data source of the event information, identifiers included in the event information as indicated in the accessed data store; extract identifiers from the event information based at least on the corresponding identifier parameters, where a combination of the identifiers include a unique identity associated with a unique user; access a plurality of hash function, each associated with a combination of identifiers; for each unique identity, calculate a plurality of hashes by evaluating the plurality of hash functions; based on whether unique identities share a common hash calculated with a common hash function, selectively group unique identities into sets of unique identities associated with common hashes; for each set of unique identities: apply one or more match rules including criteria for comparing unique identities within the set; determine a matching set of unique identities as those meeting one or more of the match rules; merge matching sets of unique identities each including at least one common unique identity to provide one or more merged sets having no unique identity in common with other merged sets; for each merged set: determine an inverted personal identifier; associate the inverted personal identifier to each of the unique identities in the merged set; for each unique identity: identify event information associated with at least one of the combinations of identifiers associated with the unique identity, and associate the inverted personal identifier with the identified event information. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The computer system where the hash functions include at least: a first hash function that evaluates a first combination of at least portions of a first identifier and at least portions of a second identifier extracted from event information; and a second hash functions that evaluates a second combination of at least portions of the first identifier and at least portions of a third identifier extracted from event information; The computer system where the first hash function is selected based on identifier types of one or more of the first identifier or the second identifier. The computer system where the first identifier is a social security number of the user and the second identifier is a last name of the user, and the first combination is a concatenation less than all of the digits of the social security number and less than all characters of the last name of the user. The computer system where a first set of events includes a plurality of events associated with the first hash and a second set of events includes plurality of events each associated with the second hash. The computer system where the identifiers are selected from: first name, last name, middle initial, middle name, date of birth, social security number, taxpayer id, or national id. The computer system where the computer system generates an inverted map associating an inverted personal identifier to each of the remaining unique identities in the merged sets and stores the map in a data store. The computer system further including, based on the inverted personal identifier assigned to the remaining unique identities, assign the inverted personal identifier to each of the plurality of event information including the remaining unique identities. The computer system where the hash functions include locality sensitive hashing. The computer system where the one or more match rules include one or more identity resolution rules that compare u in the one or more sets with account holder information in an external database or CRM system to identify matches to the one or more match rules. The computer system where the identity resolution rules include criteria indicating match criteria between the account holder information and the identifiers. The computer system where the merging sets includes, for each of one or more sets, repeating the process of: pairing each unique identity in a set with another unique identity in the set to create pairs of unique identity; determining a common unique identity in pairs; and in response to determining the common unique identity, grouping noncommon unique identities from the pairs with the common unique identity until lists of unique identities contained within resulting groups are mutually exclusive between resulting groups. The computer system where the determining a common unique identity in pairs further includes sorting the unique identities in pairs. Implementations of the described techniques may include hardware, a method or process, or computer software on a computer-accessible medium.
Another general aspect includes a computer system including: one or more hardware computer processors, and one or more storage devices configured to store software instructions configured for execution by the one or more hardware computer processors to cause the computer system to: receive a plurality of events from one or more data sources, where at least some of the events have heterogeneous structures; store the events in the heterogeneous structures for access by external processes; for each of the data sources; identify a domain based at least in part on data structure or data from the data source; access a vocabulary associated with the identified domain; and for each event; determine whether the event matches some or all a vocabulary; associate the event with the corresponding domain or vocabulary; associate one or more tags with portions of the event based on the determined domain. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The computer system further including the software instructions, when executed by the one or more hardware processors, are configured to cause the computer system to: receive a request for information associated with a user in a first domain; execute one or more domain parsers configured to identify events associated with the user having one or more tags associated with the first domain; and provide at least some of the identified events to a requesting entity. The computer system where the at least some of the identified events includes only those portions of the identified events associated with the one or more tags associated with the first domain. Implementations of the described techniques may include hardware, a method or process, or computer software on a computer-accessible medium.
Another general aspect includes a computerized method including, by a computing system having one or more computer processors: receiving a plurality of event information from one or more data sources, where the plurality of event information have heterogeneous data structures; determining a domain for each of the one or more data sources based at least in part on one or more of the data source, a data structure associated with the data source, or event information from the data source; accessing a domain dictionary associated with the determined domain including domain vocabulary, domain grammar, and/or annotation criteria; annotating one or more portions of event information from the determined domain with domain vocabulary where based on annotation criteria; receiving a request for event information or data included in event information; interpreting the event information based on the one or more annotated portions of the event information; and providing the requested data based on the interpretation. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
Certain embodiments will now be described with reference to the following drawings. Throughout the drawings, reference numbers may be re-used to indicate correspondence between referenced elements. The drawings are provided to illustrate example embodiments described herein and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure or the claims.
This disclosure presents various architectures and embodiments of systems and methods related to data association, attribution, annotation, and interpretation systems and related methods of efficiently organizing heterogeneous data at a massive scale. The disclosed systems and methods can be implemented to provide credit data based on smart and efficient credit data architecture.
More accurate and reliable credit-related information can further boost the confidence levels of entities reviewing the credit-related information. For example, accurate and reliable provision of credit statement, cash flow, balance statement, credit score, or other credit attributes can more accurately paint the creditworthiness of an individual. Ideally, collecting all credit-related information related to an individual and updating the individual's credit attributes every time credit-related information is collected would provide such more accurate and reliable credit attributes. However, there are very real technical challenges that make it difficult to have more timely, accurate, and reliable credit attributes. The same or similar challenges may apply to other types of data collection, storage, analysis etc. For example, systems may also struggle with timely resolution of large masses of event data associated with travel-related events, crime-related events, educational-related events, etc. to particular individuals. Thus, any discussion herein of technical problems and solutions in the context of credit-related information are equally applicable to other types of information.
One technical challenge relates to dealing with sheer volume of credit events that need to be collected, analyzed, stored, and made accessible to requesting entities. For example, if there are 40 million people and each person has 20 accounts (e.g., bank accounts, mortgages, car leases, credit cards), there are 800 million accounts that are constantly generating credit events. By a modest assumption, if each credit event contains 1000 bytes of data, sheer volume of raw credit events for 12 months may be approximately 10 terabytes or more of data. If some internal guidelines or external regulations require 5 years of credit events to be archived, the volume may approach 50 terabytes. The challenge is further complicated by the trend of increasing digital transactions both from increasing population and increased digital transaction adoption. Traditional data collection models where collection and analysis of data are treated as distinct steps in a lateral process may fail to meet the demand for quick analytics, statements, and reports.
Another technical challenge relates to dealing with various formats of the event data. The events may be received from various entities, such as lenders, credit card providers, banks, car dealers, brokers, or the like. Often the entities provide credit events in their proprietary data structure or schema. The collected data are often stored in a database, such as a relational database, which, while providing benefits of structured organization with standard data structures, can be ill-equipped in collecting data having heterogeneous structures. Additionally, such databases may require resource-heavy processes of extract, transform, and load (ETL) operations. The ETL operations often also require extensive programming efforts in incorporating data structures from new data sources.
Even when collected data is successfully transformed to conform to database schemas provided by the databases, often the database schemas are too rigid to accommodate information. Expanding the database schemas can quickly become a gargantuan task as new data sources with disparate data structures continue to become available. Accordingly, database managers are put up against decisions to (1) trim extra information that may become important at some point (essentially trimming to fit square data into a round schema), or (2) disregard available nonconforming information altogether knowing that future analysis will be inaccurate. Both approaches are less than ideal as both approaches introduce incompleteness or inaccuracy.
In addition to challenges in collecting data, there also are technical challenges related to analysis. For example, such systems can be painfully slow to generate a credit report for an individual. From multiple terabytes of data (per year), the systems search for records matching a requesting individual in order to generate a credit statement. Such systems may take days or weeks to calculate credit statements for 40 million people. Not only does the delayed generation of the statements not reflect the current state of the individual, but also indicates that a significant amount of computing resources are tied to the task of generating the statements. This provides a non-optimal mechanism for detecting fraud through the credit data, since data on the credit reports may be several days stale by the time it is provided to the user. Further, even when the fraudulent transaction has been removed, it may take multiple days, weeks, or more for the change to be indicated on an updated credit report. Accordingly, it is not too much of an exaggeration to say that credit statements generated from these reporting systems can be misleading in their reflections of an individual's true creditworthiness.
The delay in obtaining results is not the only challenge in analysis. Often, personally identifiable information of individuals are not exact or up to date. For example, someone may use street address with “101 Main Street” for one credit card, but use “101 Main St.” for her mortgage account or, as is quite common, change phone number. Credit events from one financial institution may have an updated phone number while credit events from another financial institution may have an outdated phone number. Such irregularities and outdated personally identifiable information pose a unique challenge to a data analyst, such as to accurately resolve credit events of a user from multiple sources based on personally identifying information that doesn't match between those events.
Credit data storage and analysis systems may implement data models where rigorous ETL processes are positioned near the data ingestion in order to standardize incoming data, where ETL processes involve restructuring, transformation, and interpretation. As will be described, early interpretation can mean early introduction of defects into the data flow, and the extended life cycle of each defect before the data consumption provides ample propagation opportunity for the defect. Additionally, as such systems update ETL processes for each new incoming data with new data structures, significant software and engineering efforts are expended to incorporate the new incoming data. Eventually, marginal effort to maintain the upstream interpretation can overwhelm such system. Also, ETL processes may transform the original data or create a substantially similar copy of the original data. When some defect in the interpretation process is found after the original data is transformed into a standard form, there can be a severe loss of information. Alternatively, when original event data is substantially copied, there is a waste of storage space and severe impact of processing capabilities of the larger data set. In various implementations of credit data systems, one or more of the following technical problems or challenges may be encountered:
Therefore, such credit data systems (and other high volume data analysis systems) are technically challenged at least in their lack of agility, adaptability, accuracy, reliability, interoperability, defect management and storage optimization.
Definitions
In order to facilitate an understanding of the systems and methods discussed herein, a number of terms are defined below. The terms defined below, as well as other terms used herein, should be construed to include the provided definitions, the ordinary and customary meaning of the terms, and/or any other implied meaning for the respective terms. Thus, the definitions below do not limit the meaning of these terms, but only provide exemplary definitions.
The terms “user,” “individual,” “consumer,” and “customer” should be interpreted to include single persons, as well as groups of users, such as, for example, married couples or domestic partners, organizations, groups, and business entities. Additionally, the terms may be used interchangeably. In some embodiments, the terms refer to a computing device of a user rather than, or in addition to, an actual human operator of the computing device.
Personally identifiable information (also referred to herein as “PII”) includes any information regarding a user that alone may be used to uniquely identify a particular user to third parties. Depending on the embodiment, and on the combination of user data that might be provided to a third party, PII may include first and/or last name, middle name, address, email address, social security number, IP address, passport number, vehicle registration plate number, credit card numbers, date of birth, and/or telephone number for home/work/mobile. In some embodiments user IDs that would be very difficult to associate with particular users might still be considered PII, such as if the IDs are unique to corresponding users. For example, Facebook's digital IDs of users may be considered PII to Facebook and to third parties.
User Input (also referred to as “Input”) generally refers to any type of input provided by a user that is intended to be received and/or stored by one or more computing devices, to cause an update to data that is displayed, and/or to cause an update to the way that data is displayed. Non-limiting examples of such user input include keyboard inputs, mouse inputs, digital pen inputs, voice inputs, finger touch inputs (e.g., via touch sensitive display), gesture inputs (e.g., hand movements, finger movements, arm movements, movements of any other appendage, and/or body movements), and/or the like.
Credit data generally refers to user data that is collected and maintained by one or more credit bureaus (e.g., Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax), such as data that affects creditworthiness of a consumer. Credit data may include transactional or state data, including but not limited to, credit inquiries, mortgage payments, loan situations, bank accounts, daily transactions, number of credit cards, utility payments, etc. Depending on the implementation (and possibly regulations of the region in which the credit data is stored and/or accessed), some or all of credit data can be subject to regulatory requirements that limit, for example, sharing of credit data to requesting entities based on the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regulations in the United States and/or other similar federal regulations. “Regulated data,” as used herein, often refers to credit data as an example of such regulated data. However, regulated data may include other types of data, such as HIPPA regulated medical data. Credit data can describe each user data item associated with a user, e.g., an account balance, account transactions, or any combination of the user's data items.
Credit file and credit report each generally refer to a collection of credit data associated with a user, such as may be provided to the user, to a requesting entity that the user has authorized to access the user's credit data, or to a requesting entity that has a permissible purpose (e.g., under the FCRA) to access the users credit data without the user's authorization.
Credit Event (or “event”) generally refers to information associated with an event that is reported by an institution (including a bank, a credit card provider, or other financial institutions) to one or more credit bureaus and/or the credit data system discussed herein. Credit events may include, for example, information associated with a payment, purchase, bill payment due date, bank transaction, credit inquiries, and/or any other event that may be reported to a credit bureau. Typically one credit event is associated with one single user. For example, a credit event may be a specific transaction, such as details regarding purchase of a particular product (e.g., Target, $12.53, grocery, etc.) or a credit event may be information associated with a credit line (e.g., Citi credit card, $458 balance, $29 minimum payment, $1000 credit limit, etc. Generally, a credit event is associated with one or more unique identifies, wherein each unique identity includes one or more unique identifiers associated with a particular user (e.g., a consumer). For example, each identifier may include one or more pieces of PII of the user, such as all or some portion of a user's name, physical address, social security number (“SSN”), bank account identifier, email address, phone number, national ID (e.g., passports or driver's license), etc.
Inverted PID refers to a unique identifier that is assigned to a particular user to form a one-to-one relationship. An inverted PID can be associated with an identifier of the user, such as a particular PII (e.g., an SSN of “555-55-5555”) or a combination of identifiers (e.g., a name of “John Smith” and an address of “100 Connecticut Ave”) to form a one-to-many relationships (between the PID and each of multiple combinations of identifiers associated with a user). When an event data includes an identifier or combination of identifiers associated with a particular inverted PID, the particular inverted PID may be associated with (referred to as “stamped” herein) to the event data. Accordingly, a system may use inverted PIDs and their associated identity information to identify event data associated with a particular user based on multiple combinations of user identifiers included in the event data.
Credit Data Systems
Credit data associated with a user is often requested and considered by entities such as lenders, credit card providers, banks, car dealers, brokers, etc. when determining whether to extend credit to the user, whether to allow the user to open an account, whether to rent to the user, and/or in making decisions regarding many other relationships or transactions in which credit worthiness may be factor. An entity requesting credit data, which may include a request for a credit report or a credit score, may submit a credit inquiry to a credit bureau or credit reseller. The credit report or a credit score may be determined at least based on analyzing and computing credit data associated with the user's bank accounts, daily transactions, number of credit cards, loan situations, etc. Furthermore, a previous inquiry from a different entity may also affect the user's credit report or credit score.
Entities (e.g., financial institutions) may also wish to acquire a user's most updated credit data (e.g., credit score and/or credit report) in order to make a better decision whether to extend credit to the user. However, there may be substantial delay in generating a new credit report or credit score. In some cases, the credit bureau may only update a user's credit report or score once a month. As described above, the substantial delay may be caused by the sheer volume of data a credit bureau needs to collect, analyze and compute in order to generate a credit report or credit score. The process of collecting credit data that may affect an user's creditworthiness, such as the user's credit score, from credit events is generally referred to herein as “data ingestion.” Credit data systems may perform data ingestion using lateral data flow from system to system, such as by using a batch ETL process (e.g., as briefly discussed above).
In an ETL data ingestion system, credit events associated with multiple users may be transmitted from different data sources to a Database (Online System), such as one or more relational databases. The online system may extract, transform and load raw data associated with different users from the different data sources. The online system can then normalize, edit, and write the raw data across multiple tables in the first relational database. As the online system inserts data into the database, it must match the credit data with the identifying data about consumers in order to link the data to the correct consumer records. When new data comes in, the online system needs to repeat the process and update the multiple tables in the first relational database. Because incoming data, such as names, addresses, etc. often contain errors, does not conform to established data structures, are incomplete, and/or have other data quality or integrity issues, it is possible that new data would initiate reevaluation of certain previously determined data linkages. In such cases, the online system may unlink and relink credit data to new and/or historical consumer records.
In some cases, certain event data should be excluded from a credit data store, such as if there is a detected error in the data file provided by the data source, or a defect in the credit data system software that may have incorrectly processed historical data. For example, an unintelligent credit data system that stores data in the date format MM/DD/YYYY may accept incoming data from a data source using the date format DD/MM/YY, which may introduce error in a user's creditworthiness calculation. Alternatively, such data may cause the credit data system to reject the data altogether, which may result in incomplete and/or inaccurate calculation of a user's creditworthiness. Worse yet, where the erroneous data has already been consumed by the credit data system to produce a user's (albeit inaccurate) creditworthiness metric, the credit data system may need to address complexities of not only excluding the erroneous data, but also unwinding all the effects of the erroneous data. Failure to do so may leave the online database in an inconsistent or inaccurate state.
Such incremental processing logic makes the data ingestion process complex, error-prone, and slow. In ETL implementations, the online system can send data to a batch system including a second database. The batch system may then extract, transform, and load the data associated with credit attributes of a user to generate credit scores and analytical reports for promotional and account review purposes. Due to the time it takes to extract, transform and load data into the batch system, the credit scores and analytical reports may lag the online system by hours or even days. The lagging batch system, in the event of an update to user identifying data, may continue to reflect old and potentially inaccurate user identifying data such that linkages between incoming credit data and the user data may be broken, thereby providing inaccurate credit data until the linkages are corrected and propagated to the batch system.
Overview of Improved Credit Data System
The present disclosure describes a faster and more efficient credit data system directed to address the above noted technical problems. The credit data system may perform sequential processing of a collection of heterogeneous events, simultaneous creation of a credit state and credit attributes for analytics, a batch indexing process, and/or creation of credit profiles in real-time by merging credit state with real-time events, each of which is described in further detail below.
A batch indexing process may more efficiently associate credit events to correct users at a massive scale by efficiently “clustering” unique identities by first reducing dimensionality of the original credit events, identifying false positives, and providing a whole validated set of unique identities that can be associated with a user. By using inventive combination of processes in a particular order, the credit data system solves the particular problem of efficiently identifying credit events belonging to a particular user in efficiency by powers of magnitudes. Additionally, assignment of inverted PIDs allows for a new and more efficient data arrangement that the credit data system can utilize to provide requested credit data pertaining to a user faster by powers of magnitudes. The improved credit data system can generate various analytics of a user's activities and state (such as a credit report) based on up-to-date credit events associated with that user.
The credit data system may implement a lazy data interpretation, in which the system does not alter the heterogeneous incoming data from multiple data sources, but annotates or tags the data without performing ETL processes on the data. By performing only minimal processing near data ingestion, the credit system minimizes software size and complexity near the data ingestion, thereby greatly reducing defect formation and issues with defect management. Additionally, by doing away with ETL processing and preserving data in their original heterogeneous form, the system can accept any type of data without losing valuable information. Domain categorization and domain vocabulary annotation provides for new data structures that allows for late positioning of the interpretation components, such as parsers. The late positioning of parsers improves over the existing systems by reducing overall defect impact on the system and allowing for easy addition or adaptation of the parsers.
While some embodiments of a credit data system or other similarly named systems are discussed herein with reference to various features and advantages, any of the discussed features and advantages may be combined or separated in the additional limitations of a credit data system.
Additionally, the credit data system may implement a batch indexing process. The incorporation of the batch indexing process may eliminate the need to ETL data from different credit events to conform to a particular database or data structures and, therefore, may reduce or even eliminate bottlenecks associated with ETL of the credit events. The batch indexing process, as will be described in further detail throughout this application, utilizes the indexing engine 104, identification engine 106, event cache engine 108, sorting engine 110, and/or credit data store 112, which are components of the credit data system 102. The indexing engine 104 can assign hash values to unique identities (further detailed with respect to
Unaltered Processing of Heterogeneous Credit Events
Each credit event 122A-122N can contain one or more unique identities that associate the credit event 122A-122N with a particular user 120 who generated the credit event 122A-122N. A unique identity may include various user identifying information, such as a name (first, middle, last, and/or full name), address, social security number (“SSN”), bank account information, email address, phone number, national ID (passport or driver's license), etc. The unique identities can also include partial names, partial address, partial phone number, partial national ID, etc. When the financial institutions 126A-126B provide credit events 122A-122N for collection and analysis by a credit data system, generally the credit events can be recognized as being associated with a particular user through a combination of user identifying information. For example, there may be multiple people who share same first name and last name (consider “James Smith”) and thus first name and last name may be overly inclusive of other users' credit events. However, combinations of user identifying information, such as full name plus phone number, can provide satisfactory identification. While each financial institution 126 may provide credit events 122A-122N in different formats, the credit events are likely to include user identifying information or combinations of user identifying information that can be used to associate to which user the credit event should be associated. Such user identifying information or combinations of user identifying information forms a unique identity of the user. Accordingly, multiple unique identities may be associated with a particular user.
The credit data system can work with heterogeneous credit events 122A-122N having different data structure and providing different unique identity along with the credit events 122A-122N. For example, a credit event from a mortgager financial institution may include SSN and national ID, whereas a credit event from VISA may include name and address, but not SSN or national ID. The credit data system, instead of performing ETL on the credit events 122A-122N to standardize the credit events 122A-122N for storage on the credit data store 112, can perform an batch indexing process (as later described in detail with respect to
As will be described in further detail, the batch indexing process reduces or eliminates significant computing resource overhead associated with ETL of heterogeneous formats, significantly cuts down processing overhead. Additionally, assigning an inverted PID to a credit event is beneficial in that, once correct inverted PID is assigned to a credit event, the credit data system 120 no longer needs to manage credit events based on the contained unique identities. In other words, once the credit data system 120 has identified a user associated with a credit event, it does not need to perform searching operation to find unique identities in credit events 122A-122N but simply look for the credit events 122A-122N assigned user's inverted PID. For example, in response to receiving a credit data request 118 from an external entity 116 (such as a financial institution, a lender, potential landlord, etc.), the credit data system with the batch indexing process can quickly compile a list of credit events of a user 120 with the user's inverted PID and provide any requested credit data 114 almost instantaneously.
Example of Sequential Processing of Collection of Heterogeneous Events
The credit data system can also generate bureau views in process 220. In the process 220, the credit data system can load a user event collection (identified events in the data store 214 that may have optionally been sorted by the sorting process 216) associated with a user in memory at process 222 from the event collections data store 218. The system can then calculate attributes 224, score models 226, and generate nested bureau view 228. The credit data system can then store the attribution calculation in an analytics data (columnar) store 230. The analytics data can be used in applications 234 to generate a credit score for the user. The nested bureau view can be stored in credit state (KV Container) data store 232. The data in the credit state data store can be used in data steward application process 236 and credit inquiry service 238.
During the sequential processing, the credit events may remain in the same state as they are transmitted to the credit data system by the financial institutions. Financial data may also remain the same.
Example of Simultaneous Creation of a Credit State and Credit Attributes for Analytics
In the speed layer 340, various high frequency data sources 342 may transmit new credit events to the credit data system through a high frequency ingestion process 344. The credit data system can conduct a low latency curation process 348 and then store the new credit events associated with various users in a data store 350. The new credit events associated with a user may cause changes in the user's credit state. The new credit state may be stored in a data store 328. The credit data system can then conduct a credit profile lookup service process 330 to look for a watermark to find the stored credit state associated with the user. In some embodiments, the event cache engine is configured to allow even very recent credit events that aren't yet recorded to the user's full credit state to be included in credit attributes that are provided to third party requesters. For example, while event data is being added to credit data store (e.g., which may take hours or event days to complete), the event stored in the new credit events data store 350 may store the most recent credit events and be accessed when credit inquiries are received. Thus, requested reports/scoring may include credit events within milliseconds of receiving the event from a creditor.
The credit data system can use various bureau applications 332 to calculate a credit score or generate a credit report for the user based on the new credit state. Additionally, the credit data system can send instructions the high frequency ingestion process 344 via a high frequency message channel 352. The new credit events can be transmitted by the high frequency ingestion process 344 again to a file writer process 346. The credit data system can then store the new credit events into an event batch 308. The new credit events can then be stored to the data store 310 through the high throughput ingestion process 306.
The credit data system can store credit events in its original form, generate a credit state based on the credit events and calculate attributes for a user. When a new credit event is transmitted from a financial institution, or an error is detected in an existing credit event by a financial institution, the credit data system can conduct a credit profile lookup service to make changes in the credit state or merge the credit state with real-time events. The credit data system can generate an updated credit profile based on the updated credit state.
The simultaneous creation of the credit state and the credit attributes can monitor changes in a user's credit state and update credit attributes when changes are detected. The changes in the user's credit state may be caused by a new credit event or an error detected in an existing credit event. The credit events may remain the same at least partly because the credit data system do not extract, transform and load data into database. If there is an invalid event detected later by the credit data system, the credit data system can simply exclude the invalid event from future creation. Thus, real-time reporting of events can be reflected on a user's profile within minutes with the help of the credit data system.
Example of Batch Indexing Process
The identity stripping process 402 extracts identity fields (e.g., SSN, national ID, phone number, email, etc.) from credit events. The credit data system can partition 404 credit events by different financial institutions (e.g., credit card providers or lenders) and/or accounts. The credit data system can then extract 406 identity fields from the partitioned credit events without modifying the credit events. The identity stripping process 402 may include a specialized extraction process for each different credit event format provided by different financial institutions. In some embodiments, the identity stripping process 402 may conduct a deduplication process 406 to remove same or substantially similar identity fields before generating unique identity, which may be a combination of identity fields, associated with the credit event. This process will be further detailed with respect to
In the identity matching process 410, the credit data system can perform a process that reduces dimensionality of the unique identities determined in the identity stripping process 402. For example, a locality sensitive hashing 412 process can be such a process. The locality sensitive hashing process, depending on design of the hashing process, can calculate hash values (e.g., identity hashes 414) that have increased or decreased collision probability based on similarity of the original hash keys (e.g., unique identities 408). For example, a well-designed hashing process can take disparate but similar unique identifiers, such as “John Smith, 1983/08/24, 92833-2983” and “Jonathan Smith, 1983/08/24, 92833” (full name, birthdate, and ZIP codes) and digest the disparate but similar unique identifiers into a same hash value. Based on the sharing of the common hash value, the two unique identities can be grouped into a set as potentially matching unique identities associated to a user (the details of the hash-based grouping process will be further detailed with respect to
However, because hash functions can result in unintended collisions, the hash-based sets can contain false positives (e.g., wrongly associating some credit events not associated with a user to the user. For example, one of John's unique identities may have a same hash value with one of Jane's unique identity and, after hash value association, may get grouped into a same set of unique identities associated with Jane). The credit data system can apply a matching rule application 416 on the sets of unique identities to remove the false positive unique identities from the sets. Various matching rules can be designed to optimize the chance of detecting the false positives. An example match rule can be “only exact match of national ID,” which would remove, from a set of unique identities associated with a user, unique identities that do not include the national ID on file. Another match rule may be “minimum match on both name and ZIP code,” where minimum may be determined based on a calculated score of the match on both name and ZIP code compared against the minimum threshold score. Once false positives are removed from each set, the resulting matched identity subsets 418 contain only the unique identities that are validated.
In some embodiments, the match rules may be designed with trustworthiness of each user identifier in mind. For example, driver's license number from Department of Motor Vehicles can be associated with high confidence level and may not require much beyond inspecting the driver's license numbers for an exact match. On the other hand, a ZIP code provides for lower confidence level. Also, the match rules may be designed to take into account history associated with a particular record. If the record comes from an established bank account having a long history, the match rule may not need to apply strict scrutiny. On the other hand, if the record comes from a newly opened account, a stricter match rule may be required to remove false positives (e.g., identify records in a set that are likely associated with another user). This process will be further detailed with respect to
The subsets 418 of unique identities can then be merged with other subsets containing other unique identities of the user. Each subset 418 contain only the unique identities correctly identifying a user. However, the subsets 418, due to possible false negatives from the dimensionality reducing process, are not guaranteed to digest into a same hash value. Accordingly, some unique identity associated with a user may, when grouped based on hash values, be put in disparate subsets 418. With set merging 420 process, when subsets common unique identities, the credit data system can merge the two subsets into one group (e.g., matched identities 422) containing all the unique identities associated with a particular user.
The credit data system can then assign an inverted PID to each unique identity in the merged group. From the assignments, the credit data system can then create 424 an inverted PID map 426 where each inverted PID is associated with multiple unique identities in the group associated with a particular user. This process will be further detailed with respect to
In the example identity stamping process 440, the inverted PID map 426 may be used to stamp the partitioned credit events 404 to generate PID stamped credit events 430. In some embodiments, the inverted PID stamping leaves the credit events associated with the inverted PID unaltered. This process will be further detailed with respect to
Example of Identity Stripping
The credit data system can partition credit events 504 by different financial institutions and/or accounts. The credit data system can extract 406 identity fields of the credit events and may optionally conduct a deduplication process to eliminate redundant identity fields. The credit data system may then generate unique identities based on the extracted identity fields. The identity stripping process starts with the credit events 510 and extracts unique identities 512. In the example of
Example of Identity Matching: Locality Sensitive Hashing
Multiple hash functions (e.g., h1602, h5604, etc.) can be applied on each records (e.g., r1-r16) to generate hash values (e.g., h1′ 606, h5′ 608, h1′ 610, h1″ 612, etc.). Here, each row-column combination represents a hash function of the column being applied on a record of the row to generate a hash value of the row-column combination. For example, has function h1602 applied on unique identity r2620 generates hash value h1′ 610.
In some embodiments, each hash function can be designed to control a probability of collision for a given record. For example, h1602 may be a hash function focusing on finding similar first names by causing collision with other records having similar first names. On the other hand, h5604 may be a hash function focusing on SSN, where likelihood of collision is lower than the hash function focusing on finding similar first names h1. Various hash functions may be designed to better control collision likelihood. One of the benefits of the disclosed credit data system is its capacity to substitute or supplement various hash functions. The credit data system does not require a particular type of hash function, but allows the user (e.g., a data engineer) to experiment with and engineer to improve the overall system by simply interfacing different hash function. This advantage can be significant. For example, when the data engineer wants to migrate the credit data system into another country using another character set, say Chinese or Korean, the data engineer can replace hashing functions directed toward English alphabet to hashing functions that provide better results for Chinese or Korean characters. Also, where national ID is of different format, such as Korea using 12 digit numbers for SSN as opposed to 9 digits SSN in US, a hash function better suited for 12 digit number can replace the 9 digit hash function.
While
As described with respect to
Such hash value based grouping can be an incredibly fast grouping process that does not require much computing resources to execute. A hash function has low operational complexity and calculating hash values for massive amount of data can execute in a relatively short time. By grouping similar records together into sets, the process of identifying which records are associated with a particular user is greatly simplified. In a sense, the universe of all credit events that require association to the user has been narrowed to only the records in the sets.
However, as briefly mentioned with respect to
The credit data system then uses a rigorous identity resolution process (“matching rules applications”) to remove such false positives from each set.
Example of Identity Matching: Matching Rules
In some embodiments, the matching rules may compute one or more confidence scores and compare against one or more associated thresholds. For example, a matching rule of “minimum match on both name and ZIP code” may have a threshold score that determines the minimum match and the matching rule may throw out a record having a computed score below the threshold value. The matching rules may inspect identifiers of records (e.g., names, national IDs, age, birthdate, etc.), format, length, or other properties and/or attributes of the records. Some examples include:
The matching rules can also be any other combinations of such criteria.
The resulting subsets 418 after application of matching rules contain same or fewer records compared to the original sets.
Example of Identity Matching: Set Merging
After the matching process of
A closer inspection of the first subset and the second subset reveals both subsets contain at least one common record, r3. Because each subset is associated with a unique user, all records in a same subset can also be associated with the same unique user. Logic dictates that if at least one common record exists in two disparate subsets that is associated with a unique user, the two disparate subsets should both be associated with the unique user and the two disparate subsets can be merged into a single group containing all the records in the two subsets. Therefore, based on the common record, r3, the first subset 802 and the second subset 804 are combined to yield an expanded group containing the records (i.e., {r1, r3, r5, r15} of the two subsets after the set merge process. Similarly, another subset 808 containing {r2, r15} can be merged into the expanded group based on the common record r15 to form a further expanded group 820 containing {r1, r2, r3, r5, r15}. Similarly, another group 822 containing {r10, r12, r16} can be formed based on other subsets 806 and 810. After the set merge process is complete, all the resulting groups will be records that are mutually exclusive. Each merged groups may contain all the records containing unique identities associated with a user.
Example Set Merging Process
The above illustrated set merging can use various methods. Speed of merging sets may be important when sheer volume of records count in the millions or even billions. Here, one efficient grouping method is described.
The group algorithm first reduces each set into relationships of degree 2 (i.e., pairs). The algorithm then groups the relationships of degree 2 by the leftmost record. The algorithm then reverses or rotates the relationships of degree 2 to generate additional pairs. Then, the algorithm again groups the relationships of degree 2 by the leftmost record. Similarly, the algorithm repeats these processes until the all subsets are merged into final groups. Each final group can be associated with one user.
For illustrative purpose, subsets in
{r1, r3, r5}, {r3, r5, r15}, {r10, r12}, {r2, r15}, {r12, r16}, and {r1, r3}.
Starting with the subsets, pairs of records (i.e., reducing each group into relationships of degree 2) are generated from the subsets. For example, the first subset containing {r1, r3, r5} can generate pairs:
The second subset containing {r3, r5, r15} can generate pairs:
The third subset containing {r10, r12} can generate pair:
The fourth subset containing {r2, r15} can generate pair:
The fifth subset containing {r12, r16} can generate pair:
The sixth subset containing {r1, r3} can generate pair:
The example merging process may list all the pairs. Because duplicates do not contain any additional information, the duplicates have been removed:
Rotate or reverse each pair:
Group by first record where the first record is common between the pairs:
Another round of generating pairs. Duplicates are not shown:
Rotate or reverse each pair. Duplicates are not shown:
Group by leftmost record where the first record is common between the pairs:
Another round of generating pairs. Duplicates are not shown:
Rotate or reverse each pair. Duplicates are not shown:
Group by leftmost record where the first record is common between the pairs:
{r1, r2, r3, r5, r15} {r3, r1, r2, r5, 05}-duplicate {r5, r1, r2, r3, 05}-duplicate {r10, r12, r16}{r12, r10, r16}-duplicate {r16, r10, 02}-duplicate
By repeating the example process of (1) creating pairs, (2) rotating or reversing each pair, (3) group by leftmost record, the subsets merge into the resulting groups illustrated in
Example of Creating Inverted PID and Identity Stamping of Events
The credit data system can create an inverted PID map 426 containing associations between records and inverted PIDs. The inverted PID map 426 may be stored as a flat file or on a structured database. The credit data system may, once an inverted PID map is generated, incrementally update the map 426. As noted with respect to
From the hash functions that group similar records into potential matches to set merging to stamping inverted PID to credit events, the credit data system maximizes grouping. Grouping is used to narrow the analyzed universe of credit events, and to quickly access credit events in the future. Using the intelligent grouping instead of performing computationally heavy searching, the credit data system is improved by orders of magnitude. For example, retrieving credit events associated with a user with inverted PID and generating a credit statement has improved 100 times in efficiency.
These records contain user identifying information (for example, record r1654 contains user identifying information “John Smith” (name), “111-22-3443” (SSN), “Jun. 10, 1970” (birthday), “100 Connecticut Ave” (street address), “YourTown DC” (city and state), “20036” (ZIP code). The user identifying information were extracted from credit events (
Various financial institutions can provide more or less of different user identifying information. For example, VISA may provide only the first name and the last name (see, for example, r1) while American Express may provide middle name in addition to first name and last name (see, for example, r15). Some financial institutions may provide credit events that are missing one or more user identifying information all together, such as not providing driver's license number (for instance, r1-r16 do not include driver's license numbers).
Although there is no limit to how many hash functions may be applied to the records,
Hash function h211106 uses a different pre-processing, namely “SSN, birth month, birth day of month.” The records r3, r5, and r15, according to the pre-processing of h211106, produce a hash key of “111-22-34340610.” Using the hash function h211106, the hash keys calculate to “VB556NB.” However, hash functions can result in unintended collisions (in other words, false positives). The unintended collisions result in unintended record in a set of potential matches. For example, record r14, according to the pre-processing of the hash function h211106, resulted in a hash key of “766-87-16420610,” which is different with the hash key “111-22-34340610” associated with r3, r5, and r15, but nevertheless computed into same hash value “VB556NB.” Thus, when records are associated based on sharing a shame hash value from a hash function, the potential set of records belonging to a certain user may have unintendedly included a record belonging to a different user. As described, and also will be illustrated with concrete samples in
Each hash function may result in more than one set of potential matching records. For example,
Each set may include false positives. For example, although the potentially matching record set 11202 associated with the hash value “KN00NKL” includes {r1, r2, r3, r4, r5}, r2 and r4 do not seem to belong to the set of records that should be associated to John (Frederick) Smith because r2 has different “SSN and birth year” and r4 has different “first name, SSN, birth year, address, city, state, and ZIP code.” Determining whether any of the r1, r3, or r5 are false positives are trickier because there are only slight variations in SSN and birth year (rotated two digits in SSN or birth year that is only one year apart). Therefore, the records r2 and r4 are likely to be false positives while r1, r3, r5 are true positives. Similarly, other sets may contain true positives and false positives.
In some embodiments, the matching rules can calculate confidence scores and compare against thresholds to accept or reject a record in a set. For example, the set 11304 with hash value “VB556NB” may use a rule that calculates character-matching score on name. The record r14 has full name “Eric Frederick” which at best, among other records in the set 11304, matches 9 characters out of 18 characters of “John Frederick Smith” and/or “John Smith Frederick.” Therefore, a score of 50% may be calculated and compared against a minimum match threshold of, say 70%, and the credit data system may reject r14 from the set 11304. Other matching rules can be designed and applied to the sets 11302, 11304, 11306, 11308 to remove rejected records and generate subsets. In some embodiments, some or all of such matching rules may be applied across different sets 11302, 11304, 11306, 11308.
A closer inspection of the first subset and the second subset reveals both subsets contain at least one common record, r3. Because each subset is associated with a unique user, all records in a same subset can also be associated with the same unique user. Logic dictates that if at least one common record exists in two disparate subsets that are associated with a unique user, the two disparate subsets should both be associated with the unique user and the two disparate subsets can be merged into a single group containing all the records in the two subsets. Therefore, based on the common record, r3, the first subset 11302 and the second subset 11304 are combined to yield a group 11402 containing all the records (i.e., {r1, r3, r5, r15} of the two subsets after the set merge process. Similarly, another group 11404 containing {r10, r12, r16} can be formed based on other subsets 11306 and 11308. After the set merge process is complete, all the resulting groups will have mutually exclusive records. Each merged groups may contain all the records containing unique identities associated with a user.
When the algorithm described in regards to
Starting with the subsets, pairs of records (i.e., reducing each group into relationships of degree 2) are generated from the subsets. For example, the first subset containing {r1, r3, r5} can generate pairs:
The second subset containing {r3, r5, r15} can generate pairs:
The third subset containing {r10, r12} can generate pair:
The fourth subset containing {r12, r16} can generate pair:
The example merging process may list all the pairs. Because duplicates do not contain any additional information, the duplicates have been removed:
Rotate or reverse each pair:
Group by first record where the first record is common between the pairs:
Another round of generating pairs. Duplicates are not shown:
Rotate or reverse each pair. Duplicates are not shown:
Group by leftmost record where the first record is common between the pairs:
After application of the set merging algorithm, two groups {r1, r3, r5, r15} and {r10, r12, r16} each containing mutually exclusive records remain.
The computer system may access the plurality of event information by directly accessing a memory device or data store where a pre-existing event information from the data sources are stored, or the event information may be obtained in real-time over a network.
At block 1204, the computer system may extract identity fields of account holders included in the event information. The identity field extraction can involve formatting, transformation, matching, parsing, or the like. The identity fields can include SSN, name, address, ZIP code, phone number, e-mail address, or anything that can be, alone or in combination, used to attribute event information to an account holder. For example, name and address may be enough to identify an account holder. Also, an SSN may be used to identify an account holder. When the event information count in the billions and are received from many data sources using heterogeneous formats, some accounts may not provide certain identity fields and some identity fields may contain mistyped or wrong information. Therefore, when working with a massive amount of event information, it is important to consider combinations of identity fields. For example, relying on just SSN to distinguish account holders can result in misidentification of associated account holders where SSN is mistyped. By relying on other available identity fields, such as names and address, a smart computer system can correctly attribute event information to a same user. Combinations of identity fields can form unique identities used to attribute event information to users who are associated with the events.
At block 1206, the computer system may optionally deduplicate the unique identities to remove same unique identities. For example, one event information may provide, when extracted, “John Smith”, “555-55-5555” (SSN), “jsmith@email.com” (e-mail), and “333-3333-3333” phone number. Another event may also provide “John Smith”, “555-55-5555” (SSN), “jsmith@email.com” (e-mail), and “333-3333-3333” phone number. The unique identities of the two event information are the same, and thus can be candidates for deduplication. One of the unique identities may be removed so that only the non-duplicated unique identities are subject to operations at block 1208.
At block 1208, the computer system may reduce dimensionality of the unique identities with a plurality of dimensionality reduction processes. Goal in this block is to “cluster” unique identities based on some similarities contained in the unique identities. An example process that may be used to reduce the dimensionality of the unique identities based on contained similarities may be a locality sensitive hashing function. The computer system may provide plurality such dimensionality reduction processes, each process focusing on one aspect of similarity contained within the unique identities, to provide multiple “clusters” of similar (and potentially attributable to a particular user) unique identities. When locality sensitive hashing functions are used, unique identities are associated with hash values, wherein each hash function applied generates a hash value for a given unique identity. Accordingly, each unique identity may be associated with a hash value for each hash function.
At block 1210, the computer system groups the unique identities into sets based at least in part on the results of the dimensionality reductions functions having a common value. The grouping into sets is extensively detailed at an abstract level with
At block 1212, the computer system, for each set of unique identities, applies one or more match rules with criteria to remove the false positives. After the application of the match rules resulting in the removal of the false positives, the sets may become subsets of their previous sets before the application of the matching rules including only the verified unique identities.
At block 1214, the computer system merges the subsets to arrive at groups of unique identities. The set merge process includes identifying common unique identities in the subsets, and when the computer system finds at least one common unique identity, merges the subsets that contain the common unique identity. The set merging is extensively detailed at an abstract level with
At block 1216, the computer system provides a unique inverted PID for each of the groups. In a sense, this process is recognizing that each group represents a unique account holder. At block 1218, the computer system assigns the inverted PID provided for each group to all the unique identities contained within each associated group. In a sense, this process is recognizing that each of the unique identifiers, when found in event information, can identify the event information to belong to the particular account holder associated with the inverted PID.
At block 1220, the computer system inspects event information to find a unique identifier and, when a unique identifier is found, stamps the event information with an inverted PID associated with the unique identifier.
Ingestion and Consumption of Heterogeneous Data Collections (HDC)
When a system is collecting and analyzing a massive amount of heterogeneous data, there exists a possibility that some of the incoming data contain or lead to a “defect.” Defect may be broadly defined as any factor that leads to a software modification or data conversion. For example, some financial institutions that report credit events may provide non-standardized data that requires extensive ETL processing as part of data ingestion. In the process of ETL, some defects may be introduced. An example may be phone numbers using “(###) ###-####” format as opposed to “###.###.####” format. Another example is European date format versus US date format. Yet another example may be defects introduced as a result of adoption of daylight savings time. Accordingly, these defects can be introduced due to a software bug in ETL process or lack of design generalizability. Sometimes, human errors can also be a factor and cause some forms of defects. Therefore, there is a room for improving existing systems that are inadequately prepared to address defect formation and handling.
Existing data integration approaches, such as data warehouses and data marts, attempt to extract meaningful data items from incoming data and transform them into a standardized target data structure. Often, as the number of data sources providing heterogeneous data grows, software and engineering efforts required to transform or otherwise address the growing number of heterogeneous data collection also grows in size and complexity. Such system requirements and human requirements can grow to a point that marginal effort of modifying existing system and maintaining the modified system can lead to more defects. For example, incorporating a new data sources and formats can require existing system's data structure to be modified, which can at times require conversion of existing data from old data format to a new data format. The conversion process can introduce new defects. If the defects go unnoticed for a long period of time, significant effort and cost must be expended to undo the effects of the defects through further software modifications and data conversions. Ironically, such further software modifications and data conversions can also lead to defects.
The credit data systems described herein address the defect management problem by implementing what may be called a “lazy interpretation” of data, which is further detailed with respect to defect models of
Defect Models
Defect Moment=Defect Probability*Defect Leverage.
The defect moment can be understood as a defect's probable impact on the system. An integrated sum of the defect moment can quantify the expected value of the amount of defects for the system. Therefore, minimizing the sum of defect moment is desirable.
As described, the ETL processes can increase in complexity when dealing with heterogeneous data sources. Accordingly,
This type of high-to-low defect surface 13202 poses issues when defect moment is considered. Defect moment was defined as a product of defect probability and defect leverage, where the integrated sum of the defect moment quantifies the expected value of the amount of defects for the system. In this existing system, because high values are multiplied with high values and low values with low values, the integrated sum of the products can be quite large. Accordingly, the expected value of the amount of defects can be quite large.
This type of low-to-high defect surface 13302 is highly beneficial when defect moment is considered. In the credit data system, because low defect probabilities are multiplied with high defect leverages and high defect probabilities are multiplied with low defect leverages, the integrated sum of the products can be much smaller than in existing systems. Therefore, the credit data system provides an improved defect management in relation to data ingestion and data consumption.
Lazy Interpretation of Data
A “lazy interpretation” system, instead of interpreting incoming data near data ingestion (as the data model 13200 for traditional systems in
The lazy interpretation system can accept any type of event data, such as from data sources that have various data types, formats, structures, meanings, etc. For example,
In some embodiments, as new event data is accessed, the system identifies only the minimal information required to attach the data to a correct anchoring entity. For example, an anchoring entity may be a particular user and the minimum information required for attaching the new data to the particular user may be identifying information such as name, national ID, or address. When receiving new data, the system may look for this minimal set of identifying information of the particular user in the data and attaches the data with one or more user association tags (for example, where anchoring entity is a user associated with credit events, an inverted PID is one example of a user-associated tag). For a given data, the lazy interpretation system can later use the tags to identify a correct anchoring entity. The process of attaching a tag can be the matching/linking process in
The tagging/matching/linking process may be akin to cataloging a book. For example, based on an International Standard Book Number (“ISBN”), book title, and/or author of a book, a librarian can place the book on a correct section and shelf. The content or plot of the book is not necessary in the cataloging process. Similarly, based on minimal information that identifies an anchoring entity, a vehicle loan record 1404 can be associated with a particular anchoring entity. In some embodiments, each record and/or data source may be associated with a domain (further described with respect to
In some embodiments, the lazy interpretation system may include an Anchoring Entity Resolution (AER) process that corrects tags attached to the previously received data to be associated with the best known anchoring entity. The best known anchoring entity may dynamically change based on information contained in the new incoming data, such as based on the analytics of previously received data, or based on improvements in anchoring entity resolution itself. In some embodiments, the anchoring entity resolution may update the previously attached tags. The anchoring entity resolution process may periodically or continuously run in the background or foreground, may be automatically triggered by the occurrence of a predefined event, and/or initiated by a system overseer, requesting entity, or other user.
The lazy interpretation system limits the probability of defect to the interpretation and handling of identifying information. By doing away with the ETL processes of traditional systems, the lazy interpretation system reduces software and engineering efforts required to transform or otherwise address the growing size and complexity of heterogeneous data collection. As
Domain Dictionary and Vocabulary
The lazy interpretation system may include one or more parsers (
The lazy interpretation system may associate incoming data or data sources with one or more domains. For example, a credit card record 1408 or its data source may have been associated with the “credit domain.” Each domain includes a dictionary that includes vocabulary for the domain.
Based on the dictionary and the vocabularies contained within, the one or more parsers inspect the contents of the records and tag fields or values with the matching vocabulary. The parsing process may be akin to scanning through the books to identify/interpret relevant content. Similar to scanning history books for contents relevant to “George Washington” and tagging contents describing George Washington's birthplace, birth date, age, or the like with “@george_washington,” a credit parser 1508 may scan records from a credit data source or records in the credit domain and identify/interpret contents that could be relevant to credit limit and tag the identified/interpreted contents with “@credit_limit” tag (
Once tagged, downstream components including consistency checking, insight, and/or reporting in
Advantageously, the lazy interpretation provides the benefit of reducing the defects' effects. The above described interpretation by the parsers is, as
Another benefit the lazy interpretation system provides is that the system does not need to alter the original or existing heterogeneous event data. Instead of ETL processing to standardize the data for storage and interpretation, the system tags and postpones interpretation to parsers. If one or more parsers are found to introduce defects into a domain, a data engineer simply can update the one or more domain parsers. Because the original or existing event data has not been altered, re-executing parsers can quickly eliminate defects without loss of data. Additionally, in some embodiments, because a data is not copied throughout the data flow, a data engineer may curate, delete, or exclude any data without needing to update other databases.
Therefore, the lazy interpretation system's data ingestion does not need ETL processes and, therefore, the lazy interpretation system allows new data sources to be brought in rapidly and at low cost.
The domain dictionary 1602 may also include predefined source templates 1608 for heterogeneous data sources. The source templates 1608 act as a lens to expose important fields. For example, a simple example source template can be “for incoming data 1610 from a VISA data source, 6th data field is a @CreditLimit and 7th data field is a @Balance.” The annotation contributor 1612 can use one or more such source templates 1608 to tag/annotate incoming data in a domain to generate annotated data 1614. In some embodiments, machine learned models and/or other artificial intelligence may be used to supplement or replace source templates 1608 in determining and exposing important fields.
The lazy interpretation system may also include one or more domain parsers 1616. The domain parser 1616 can use annotations/tags and rules embedded in its software to present fully annotated data to applications. In some embodiments, the domain parser can, in addition to or in place of the annotations/tags that the annotation contributor 1612 provides, provide some annotations/tags to generate the fully annotated data. The domain parser 1616 can refer to the domain dictionary 1602 in its presentation of the fully annotated data to the applications or in its own annotation/tagging.
A score calculation application 1618 and an insight calculation application 1620 are provided as the example applications that can use the fully annotated data. The score calculation application 1618 may, based on the annotated data calculate a credit score (or other scores) of one or more users and provide to a requesting entity. Similarly, the insight calculation application 1620 may provide analytics or reports including balance statement, cash flow statement, spending habits, possible saving tips, etc. In some embodiments, various applications, including the score calculation 1618 and insight calculation 1620 applications, may use the fully annotated data in conjunction with the inverted PID from the batch indexing process to quickly identify all the annotated records belonging to a particular user and generate a report or analytic relating to the user.
Beginning at block 1702, the interpretation system (e.g., one or more components of the credit data system discussed elsewhere herein) receives a plurality of event information (see,
At block 1704, the lazy interpretation system determines a category or type of information (also referred to herein as a “domain”) associated with the data sources. The determination of a domain for a data source may be based on information provided by the data source. In some embodiments, the system may be able to determine (or confirm in situations where the data source provides domain information) the associated domain from inspection of the data source's data structure. In some embodiments, the event information may include some cues indicative of the domain of a particular data source and the system may be able to determine a domain for the data source based on the cues. For example, if event information (or a large portion of event information) includes the terms “water” or “gas,” the system may automatically determine that the data source should be associated with a utility domain.
At block 1706, the system accesses a domain dictionary for the determined domain. The domain dictionary may include a domain vocabulary, domain grammar, and/or annotation criteria, examples of wherein are described above with respect to
At block 1708, the system annotates event information from the determined domain with the domain's dictionary. For example, based on the annotation criteria, the system evaluates the event information and identifies one or more portions which can be annotated with domain vocabulary.
At block 1710, the system receives data requests for event information. The requests may be for the event information (e.g., all event information that includes a particular annotation or combination of annotations) or for particular data included in the event information (e.g., portions of event information specifically associated with an annotation). For example, with respect to the annotated event information 1614 of
At block 1712, the system analyzes event information with one or more domain parsers to identify the information requested. As described with reference to
It is to be understood that not necessarily all objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment described herein. Thus, for example, certain embodiments may be configured to operate in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
All of the processes described herein may be embodied in, and fully automated, via software code modules executed by a computing system that includes one or more computers or processors. In some embodiments, at least some of the processes may be implemented using virtualization techniques such as, for example, cloud computing, application containerization, or Lambda architecture, etc., alone or in combination. The code modules may be stored in any type of non-transitory computer-readable medium or other computer storage device. Some or all the methods may be embodied in specialized computer hardware.
Many other variations than those described herein will be apparent from this disclosure. For example, depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or functions of any of the algorithms described herein can be performed in a different sequence or can be added, merged, or left out altogether (for example, not all described acts or events are necessary for the practice of the algorithms). Moreover, in certain embodiments, acts or events can be performed concurrently, for example, through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel architectures, rather than sequentially. In addition, different tasks or processes can be performed by different machines and/or computing systems that can function together.
Conditional language such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, are understood within the context as used in general to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or processes. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or processes are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or processes are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Disjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, or Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is understood with the context as used in general to present that an item, term, etc., may be either X, Y, or Z, or any combination thereof (for example, X, Y, and/or Z). Thus, such disjunctive language is not generally intended to, and should not, imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y, or at least one of Z to each be present.
Any process descriptions, elements or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or elements in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown, or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
Unless otherwise explicitly stated, articles such as “a” or “an” should generally be interpreted to include one or more described items. Accordingly, phrases such as “a device configured to” are intended to include one or more recited devices. Such one or more recited devices can also be collectively configured to carry out the stated recitations. For example, “a processor configured to carry out recitations A, B and C” can include a first processor configured to carry out recitation A working in conjunction with a second processor configured to carry out recitations B and C.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3316395 | Lavin et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
| 4163290 | Sutherlin et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4305059 | Benton | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4346442 | Musmanno | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4491725 | Pritchard | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4578530 | Zeidler | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4736294 | Gill | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4774664 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4812628 | Boston et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4827508 | Shear | May 1989 | A |
| 4868570 | Davis | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4872113 | Dinerstein | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4876592 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4891503 | Jewell | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4895518 | Arnold | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4935870 | Burk, Jr. et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4947028 | Gorog | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4989141 | Lyons et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5013038 | Luxenberg et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5025138 | Cuervo | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025373 | Keyser, Jr. et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5034807 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5060153 | Nakagawa | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5148365 | Dembo | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5216612 | Cornett et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5239462 | Jones et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5247575 | Sprague et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5259766 | Sack | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5262941 | Saladin | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5274547 | Zoffel et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5301105 | Cummings, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5317636 | Vizcaino | May 1994 | A |
| 5325509 | Lautzenheiser | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5336870 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5341429 | Stringer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5361201 | Jost et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5500513 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5528701 | Aref | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5555409 | Leenstra, Sr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5557514 | Seare et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5583760 | Klesse | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590038 | Pitroda | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5611052 | Dykstra et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5615408 | Johnson | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5621201 | Langhans et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
| 5630070 | Dietrich et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5630127 | Moore et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5640551 | Chu et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5640577 | Scharmer | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5644778 | Burks et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649114 | Deaton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5655129 | Ito | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659725 | Levy et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659731 | Gustafson | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666528 | Thai | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5692107 | Simoudis et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5696907 | Tom | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699527 | Davidson | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704029 | Wright, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704044 | Tarter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5708422 | Blonder et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5732400 | Mandler | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737732 | Gibson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5739512 | Tognazzini | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745654 | Titan | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745706 | Wolfberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748098 | Grace | May 1998 | A |
| 5754632 | Smith | May 1998 | A |
| 5754939 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764923 | Tallman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765143 | Sheldon et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768423 | Aref et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774692 | Boyer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774883 | Andersen | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778405 | Ogawa | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5793972 | Shane | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797136 | Boyer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5802142 | Browne | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812840 | Shwartz | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819291 | Haimowitz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822410 | McCausland et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822750 | Jou et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822751 | Gray et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825884 | Zdepski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828837 | Elkland | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832068 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832447 | Rieker et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835915 | Carr et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842185 | Chancey et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842211 | Horadan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844218 | Kawan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857174 | Dugan | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875236 | Jankowitz | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878403 | DeFrancesco | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5881131 | Farris et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884287 | Edesess | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893090 | Friedman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5903881 | Schrader et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5905985 | Malloy et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907828 | Meyer et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5914472 | Foladare et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918217 | Maggioncalda et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926800 | Baronowski et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930759 | Moore et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930764 | Melchione et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930776 | Dykstra et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933809 | Hunt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940812 | Tengel et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5950179 | Buchanan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5953710 | Fleming | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956693 | Geerlings | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960430 | Haimowitz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961593 | Gabber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5963932 | Jakobsson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5966695 | Melchione et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5966699 | Zandi | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978780 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991411 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995947 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999596 | Walker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006333 | Nielsen | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6012044 | Maggioncalda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014632 | Gamble et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014645 | Cunningham | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014688 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018723 | Siegel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021397 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026381 | Barton, III et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6029149 | Dykstra et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038551 | Barlow et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044351 | Jones | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044352 | Deavers | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055570 | Nielsen | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6064987 | Walker | May 2000 | A |
| 6067522 | Warady et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070141 | Houvener | May 2000 | A |
| 6070147 | Harms et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070241 | Edwards et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073104 | Field | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073106 | Rozen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073140 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085242 | Chandra | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088686 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094643 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6098052 | Kosiba et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105007 | Norris | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108641 | Kenna et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115690 | Wong | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6115694 | Cheetham et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119103 | Basch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121901 | Welch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128599 | Walker | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6128602 | Northington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6128603 | Dent | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6128624 | Papierniak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129273 | Shah | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144948 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6144957 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151601 | Papierniak et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154729 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157707 | Baulier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6157927 | Schaefer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161139 | Win et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163770 | Gamble et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171112 | Clark et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173284 | Brown | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178442 | Yamazaki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182229 | Nielsen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185543 | Galperin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199077 | Inala et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202053 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208973 | Boyer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223171 | Chaudhuri et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233588 | Marchoili et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6249770 | Erwin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253202 | Gilmour | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253203 | O'Flaherty et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256630 | Glial et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263334 | Fayyad et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263337 | Fayyad et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263447 | French et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269325 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269369 | Robertson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275824 | O'Flaherty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282658 | French et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
| 6285987 | Roth et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298348 | Eldering | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304860 | Martin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304869 | Moore et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311169 | Duhon | Oct 2001 | B2 |
| 6317783 | Freishtat et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321205 | Eder | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321339 | French et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324524 | Lent et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330575 | Moore et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6339769 | Cochrane et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343279 | Bissonette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6366903 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374229 | Lowrey et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374230 | Walker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384844 | Stewart et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6385594 | Lebda et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393406 | Eder | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397197 | Gindlesperger | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397224 | Zubeldia et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405173 | Honarvar | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405181 | Lent et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6405245 | Burson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6424878 | Barker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430539 | Lazarus et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446200 | Ball et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6448980 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453297 | Burks et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453353 | Win et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456983 | Keyes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457012 | Jatkowski | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6463533 | Calamera et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477565 | Daswani et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6496819 | Bello et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496827 | Kozam et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6496931 | Rajchel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496936 | French et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505168 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6513018 | Culhane | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517587 | Satyavolu et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6523021 | Monberg et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523022 | Hobbs | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523041 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6532450 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542894 | Lee et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6543683 | Hoffman | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6564210 | Korda et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567791 | Lent et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6567850 | Freishtat et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574623 | Laung et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6574736 | Andrews | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6581059 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587841 | DeFrancesco | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598030 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601173 | Mohler | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6611816 | Lebda et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6618727 | Wheeler et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622131 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622266 | Goddard et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629245 | Stone et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633910 | Rajan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6636803 | Hartz, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647383 | August et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6651220 | Penteroudakis et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658393 | Basch et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665677 | Wotring et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6684093 | Kuth | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6691136 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6708166 | Dysart et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6714944 | Shapiro et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6725381 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6725425 | Rajan et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6734886 | Hagan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6738748 | Wetzer | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6738759 | Wheeler et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742001 | Ripley | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748426 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6750985 | Rhoads | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6754665 | Futagami et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6766327 | Morgan, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6766946 | Iida et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6782379 | Lee | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6782390 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6795812 | Lent et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6802042 | Rangan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6804346 | Mewhinney | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6804701 | Muret et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6805287 | Bishop et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807533 | Land et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6816871 | Lee | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823319 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6826535 | Wood et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6839690 | Foth et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6839714 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6842782 | Malik et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6845448 | Chaganti et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6847942 | Land et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850895 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6853997 | Wotring et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6857073 | French et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6865680 | Wu et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871220 | Rajan et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6873972 | Marcial et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6901406 | Nabe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6910624 | Natsuno | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6928487 | Eggebraaten et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6934714 | Meinig | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6947984 | Schweitzer et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947989 | Gullotta et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950807 | Brock | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950858 | Ogami | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6954757 | Zargham et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6962336 | Glass | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6968319 | Remington et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6976056 | Kumar | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6983379 | Spalink et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6983478 | Grauch et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6985887 | Sunstein et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6985898 | Ripley et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6988085 | Hedy | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6999941 | Agarwal | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003476 | Samra et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003491 | Starkman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7003504 | Angus et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7013310 | Messing et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016870 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7016907 | Boreham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7028001 | Muthuswamy et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7028052 | Chapman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035855 | Kilger et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039176 | Borodow et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7039607 | Watarai et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7039656 | Tsai et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7043476 | Robson | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047251 | Reed et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050982 | Sheinson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050989 | Hurt et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7058817 | Ellmore | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7062458 | Maggioncalda et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7062475 | Szabo et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7065566 | Menard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7069240 | Spero et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7069249 | Stolfo et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072842 | Provost et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075894 | Hein et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076462 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076475 | Honarvar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082435 | Guzman et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7083087 | Gangi | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7085997 | Wu et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7092898 | Mattick et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7107241 | Pinto | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7117172 | Black | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7120599 | Keyes | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124144 | Christianson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7133840 | Kenna et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7133935 | Hedy | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143063 | Lent | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7155739 | Bari et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7165037 | Lazarus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7167907 | Shaffer et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171371 | Goldstein | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7174302 | Patricelli et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7178096 | Rangan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181427 | DeFrancesco | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7184974 | Shishido | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185016 | Rasmussen | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7188107 | Moon et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7188169 | Buus et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7188252 | Dunn | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7191150 | Shao et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7191451 | Nakagawa | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197468 | Patricelli et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7200602 | Jonas | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206768 | deGroeve et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7212995 | Schulkins | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219107 | Beringer | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7221377 | Okita et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7222369 | Vering et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7234156 | French et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7234160 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7236950 | Savage et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7240059 | Bayliss et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7240363 | Ellingson | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7243369 | Bhat et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246067 | Austin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246068 | Thomas, Jr. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249048 | O'Flaherty | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249072 | Nearhood et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249076 | Pendleton et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249096 | Lasater et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249113 | Continelli et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7251625 | Anglum | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7254558 | Hinkle et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7263497 | Wiser et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263548 | Daswani et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7272591 | Ghazal et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7277869 | Starkman | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7277900 | Ganesh et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7280980 | Hoadley et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7280983 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7281652 | Foss | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283998 | Moon et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289971 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7295988 | Reeves | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7296734 | Pliha | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7298872 | Glisson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302420 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7305359 | Bonnell | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308417 | Nathan | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7310617 | Cunningham | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7313538 | Wilmes et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7314166 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7315837 | Sloan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7318224 | Honarvar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7328233 | Salim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7328276 | Alisuag | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333635 | Tsantes et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333937 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337133 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7337468 | Metzger | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340424 | Gang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7340434 | Schnall | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7340679 | Botscheck et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7343295 | Pomerance | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346576 | Lent et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346703 | Cope | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7356506 | Watson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7356516 | Richey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366694 | Lazerson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7367011 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7370044 | Mulhern et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7373335 | Cleghorn et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7376603 | Mayr et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7379880 | Pathria et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7379913 | Steele et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7380707 | Man | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7383215 | Navarro et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7383988 | Slonecker, Jr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386466 | McLean et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386554 | Ripley et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7389305 | Kindig et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7392216 | Palmgren et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7395232 | Pilato | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7395273 | Khan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403919 | Chacko et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403923 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403942 | Bayliss | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7409369 | Homuth et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7418417 | Chacko et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421322 | Silversmith et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7421442 | Gelb et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424439 | Fayyad et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7424520 | Daswani et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7433864 | Malik | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7451095 | Bradley et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7451113 | Kasower | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7460857 | Roach, Jr. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467127 | Baccash et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7467401 | Cicchitto | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7475118 | Leiba et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7478157 | Bohrer et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479949 | Jobs et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480631 | Merced et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7483842 | Fung et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7490356 | Lieblich et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7505938 | Lang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7505939 | Lent et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7527967 | Chao et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7529698 | Joao | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7533179 | Tarquini et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536329 | Goldberg et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536346 | Aliffi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536348 | Shao et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542993 | Satterfield et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7543739 | Brown et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546266 | Beirne et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546271 | Chmielewski et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7552080 | Willard et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7552086 | Rajasekar et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7552089 | Bruer et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552190 | Freishtat et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7556192 | Wokaty, Jr. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7559217 | Bass | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562093 | Gelb et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562184 | Henmi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562814 | Shao et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7571138 | Miri et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7571473 | Boydstun et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7577934 | Anonsen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580884 | Cook | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7584126 | White | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7584127 | Byrne et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7584146 | Duhon | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7584197 | Dant | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7587366 | Grim, III et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7593889 | Raines et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7593891 | Kornegay et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7593892 | Balk et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7596512 | Raines et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7596716 | Frost et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7603317 | Adler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7603701 | Gaucas | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606725 | Robertson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7610229 | Kornegay | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7613600 | Krane | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7613671 | Serrano-Morales et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7617116 | Amar et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7620592 | O'Mara et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7624068 | Heasley et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7630932 | Danaher et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7630933 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634737 | Beringer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640200 | Gardner et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7647274 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7647344 | Skurtovich, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653592 | Flaxman et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7653593 | Zarikian et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653688 | Bittner | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7657540 | Bayliss | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7668840 | Bayliss et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672833 | Blume et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7672879 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7672924 | Scheurich et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7672926 | Ghazal et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7676410 | Petralia | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7676418 | Chung et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7676751 | Allen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685209 | Norton et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7689451 | Vives | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689505 | Kasower | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689506 | Fei et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689526 | Byrnes et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7690032 | Peirce | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7693787 | Provinse | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698163 | Reed et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698214 | Lindgren | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698217 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698445 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7707059 | Reed et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7707102 | Rothstein | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7707164 | Kapochunas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7707271 | Rudkin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7711635 | Steele et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7711636 | Robida et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720750 | Brody | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720846 | Bayliss | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7725385 | Royer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729959 | Wells et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7729983 | Ellis | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7730078 | Schwabe et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734522 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739139 | Robertson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742982 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7747480 | Agresta et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7747559 | Leitner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7752132 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7752236 | Williams et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7752535 | Satyavolu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7756789 | Welker et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765166 | Beringer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765279 | Kalb et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7765311 | Itabashi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7769657 | Chacko et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7769696 | Yoda | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7769998 | Lynch et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7774257 | Maggioncalda et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7774270 | MacCloskey | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7783515 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7783562 | Ellis | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7788040 | Haskell et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788147 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788152 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788155 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7792715 | Kasower | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7792732 | Haggerty et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7797252 | Rosskamm et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7797725 | Lunt et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801807 | DeFrancesco et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801812 | Conlin et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801828 | Candella et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801956 | Cumberbatch et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7805345 | Abrahams et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7810036 | Bales et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814004 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814005 | Imrey et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818228 | Coulter | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7818229 | Imrey et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818231 | Rajan | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7830382 | Cirit et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7832006 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7835983 | Lefner et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7836111 | Shan | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7840484 | Haggerty et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7841008 | Cole et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7844604 | Balo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7848972 | Sharma | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7848978 | Imrey et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849004 | Choudhuri et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849014 | Erikson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853493 | DeBie et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853518 | Cagan | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853984 | Antell et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853998 | Blaisdell et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7856386 | Hazlehurst et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860782 | Cash et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860786 | Blackburn et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7870078 | Clark et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7870151 | Mayer et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7873677 | Messing et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7877304 | Coulter | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7880728 | de los Reyes et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890420 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7895139 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899750 | Klieman et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7900052 | Joans | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7904306 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7904367 | Chung et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908242 | Achanta | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7912770 | Haggerty et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7912842 | Bayliss et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7912865 | Akerman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7925578 | Hong et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7925582 | Kornegay et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7930195 | Heyns et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7930242 | Morris et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7930252 | Bender et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7941363 | Tanaka et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7941365 | Bradley et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7945510 | Bradley et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7958126 | Schachter | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7966192 | Pagliari et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7966255 | Wong et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970676 | Feinstein | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970679 | Kasower | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970698 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7974919 | Conlin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7975299 | Balducci et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7979908 | Millwee | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7983932 | Kane | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7983975 | Jones et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7983976 | Nafeh et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7983979 | Holland, IV | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7987124 | Holden et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7991688 | Phelan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7991689 | Brunzell et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 7991901 | Tarquini et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7996912 | Spalink et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001034 | Chung et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001040 | Keithley | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001041 | Hoadley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001042 | Brunzell et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8001043 | Walker et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8001153 | Skurtovich, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001235 | Russ et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8005738 | Chacko et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8005759 | Hirtenstein et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8005795 | Galipeau et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015107 | Kornegay et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8015614 | Matsuzaki et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8019828 | Cash et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8019843 | Cash et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024263 | Zarikian et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024264 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024778 | Cash et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8032932 | Speyer et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8055579 | Davies et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060423 | Rukonic et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8060424 | Kasower | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060441 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060502 | Churi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060541 | Dant | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8064586 | Shaffer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8065233 | Lee et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8065234 | Liao et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8065264 | Achanta | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8073768 | Haggerty et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8073785 | Candella et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8078524 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8078527 | Cerise et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8078528 | Vicente et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8082202 | Weiss | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086523 | Palmer | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8095443 | DeBie | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8095458 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8099309 | Bober | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8099341 | Varghese | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8099356 | Feinstein et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8104679 | Brown | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8127982 | Casey et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8127986 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8131614 | Haggerty et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8131685 | Gedalius et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8131777 | McCullouch | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8135642 | Krause | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8160960 | Fei et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8161104 | Tomkow | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8165940 | Meimes et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170998 | Churi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8175889 | Girulat et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8180654 | Berkman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8190629 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8190998 | Bitterlich | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8195549 | Kasower | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8201257 | Andres et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8204774 | Chwast et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8204812 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214238 | Fairfield et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8219535 | Kobori et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8219771 | Le Neel | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224723 | Bosch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225395 | Atwood et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8234498 | Britti et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8239130 | Upstill et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8244635 | Freishtat et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8255978 | Dick | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8266065 | Dilip et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266168 | Bayliss | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266515 | Satyavolu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271378 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280805 | Abrahams et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8285613 | Coulter | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8285656 | Chang et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8290840 | Kasower | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8296229 | Yellin et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8306986 | Routson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8311936 | Haggerty et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8312033 | McMillan | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8315942 | Haggerty et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8321334 | Kornegay et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8321339 | Imrey et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8321952 | Spalink et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8326672 | Haggerty et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8326725 | Elwell et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8327429 | Speyer et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8335741 | Kornegay et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8340685 | Cochran et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8345790 | Sartori et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8355967 | Debie et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8359210 | Altinger et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8364518 | Blake et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8364588 | Celka et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8370371 | Moncla et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8380590 | Rukonic et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8380618 | Kazenas et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8386377 | Xiong et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8392334 | Hirtenstein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8412593 | Song et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8418254 | Britti et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8433512 | Lopatenko et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8433648 | Keithley et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8442886 | Haggerty et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8458062 | Dutt et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8458074 | Showalter | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8463595 | Rehling et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8463919 | Tarquini et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8464046 | Kragh | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8464939 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8468198 | Tomkow | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473354 | Psota et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8478674 | Kapczynski et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8484211 | Bayliss | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8489502 | Morris et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8495077 | Bayliss | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8495384 | DeLuccia | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8498930 | Chung et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8504456 | Griffin et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8504470 | Chirehdast | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8510184 | Imrev et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8510189 | Imrey et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8515828 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8515844 | Kasower | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8515862 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8521628 | Gowen et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8521729 | Churi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8527596 | Long et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8533030 | Dhir et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8533118 | Weller et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8538980 | MacKenzie | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8549472 | Tilwani | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8560161 | Kator et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8560434 | Morris et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8560436 | Ingram et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8566029 | Lopatenko et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8566141 | Nagdev et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8571971 | Brown et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8572083 | Snell et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8583593 | Achanta | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8589069 | Lehman | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8589208 | Kruger et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8589286 | Kornegay et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8595101 | Daukas et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8600854 | Mayr et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8600886 | Ramavarjula et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8606666 | Courbage et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8606694 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8620579 | Upstill et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8621562 | Antell et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8626618 | Psota et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8631242 | Britti et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8639616 | Rolenaitis et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8639920 | Stack et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8646101 | Millwee | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8650407 | Britti et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8660919 | Kasower | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8660943 | Chirehdast | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8671107 | Scully et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8671115 | Skurtovich, Jr. et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8677129 | Milana et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8694390 | Imrey et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8694420 | Oliai | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8694502 | Bayliss | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8705718 | Baniak et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8706474 | Blume et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8719159 | Keithley | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8725613 | Celka et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8732004 | Ramos et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8738515 | Chaudhuri et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8738516 | Dean et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8744956 | DiChiara et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8756099 | Keithley et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8762053 | Lehman | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8762243 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8768826 | Imrey et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8768914 | Scriffignano et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8775299 | Achanta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781877 | Kruger et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781882 | Arboletti et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8781951 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781953 | Kasower | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8782217 | Arone et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8788701 | Byrnes et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8805805 | Kobori et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8806218 | Hatakeda | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8818888 | Kapczynski et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8825544 | Imrey et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8856894 | Dean et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8862566 | Leitner et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8903741 | Imrey et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8930251 | DeBie | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8930262 | Searson et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 8930263 | Mahacek et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 8931058 | DiChiara et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8938399 | Herman | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 8938432 | Rossmark et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8949981 | Trollope et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8954459 | McMillan et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8965934 | Prieditis | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8966649 | Stack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8972400 | Kapczynski et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 9043930 | Britti et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9053589 | Kator et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9053590 | Kator et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9057616 | Lopatenko et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9057617 | Lopatenko et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9058627 | Wasser et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9075848 | Churi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9076276 | Kator et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
| 9116918 | Kim | Aug 2015 | B1 |
| 9143541 | Szamonek et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9147042 | Haller et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9152727 | Balducci et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
| 9165044 | Psenka et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9183363 | Millwee | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9189789 | Hastings et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9213461 | Eraker et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9251541 | Celka et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9256624 | Skurtovich, Jr. et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9256904 | Haller et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9268803 | Kapochunas et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9305300 | Mulhern et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9324087 | Routson et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9342783 | Chang et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
| 9438570 | Milana et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9443268 | Kapczynski et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9449346 | Hockey et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9489694 | Haller et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9529851 | Smith | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9535959 | Sun et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9553936 | Dijk et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9558519 | Burger | Jan 2017 | B1 |
| 9569797 | Rohn et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
| 9595023 | Hockey et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9595051 | Stack et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9607336 | Dean et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9636053 | Peterson et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9646058 | Churi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9652802 | Kasower | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9684905 | Haller et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9690820 | Girulat, Jr. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9697263 | Girulat, Jr. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
| 9705863 | Britti et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9710523 | Skurtovich, Jr. et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9710852 | Olson et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
| 9760553 | Hecht-Nielse | Sep 2017 | B1 |
| 9774681 | Zoldi et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9792648 | Haller et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9866561 | Psenka et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9955003 | Cody et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9989501 | Tat et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10003591 | Hockey et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10075446 | McMillan et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10102536 | Hickman et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 10104059 | Hockey et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10108818 | Curcio et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10115102 | Burrell et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10115155 | Haller et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 10117609 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10180861 | Raghavan et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10262362 | Hu et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
| 10282790 | Kolbrener et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
| 10319029 | Hockey et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
| 10339330 | Riley et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10362058 | Hu et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10367888 | Zoldi et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10380654 | Hirtenstein et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10402792 | Lin et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10417704 | Searson et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10437895 | Chang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10503798 | Chen et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10515084 | Sun et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10523653 | Hockey et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10530761 | Hockey et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10547739 | Cody et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10579647 | Allsopp et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
| 10580025 | Hickman et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10580724 | Britti et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10614463 | Hockey et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
| 10650448 | Haller et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
| 10691825 | Jones et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10693840 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10726491 | Hockey et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
| 10735183 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2020 | B1 |
| 10757154 | Jacobs et al. | Aug 2020 | B1 |
| 10810218 | Ng et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10885139 | Chen et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10887457 | Degeorgis et al. | Jan 2021 | B1 |
| 10909617 | Kasower | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10963434 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 2021 | B1 |
| 10979560 | Cody et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10984404 | Nack et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11004147 | Haller et al. | May 2021 | B1 |
| 11042662 | Riley et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11107158 | Hu et al. | Aug 2021 | B1 |
| 11157872 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
| 11159593 | Jacobs et al. | Oct 2021 | B1 |
| 11163943 | Billman et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 11227001 | Rege et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 11263218 | Pieniazek et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11270275 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11308170 | Chang et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11328083 | Jones et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11379821 | Butvin et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
| 11443316 | Burrell et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
| 11461383 | Xie et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
| 11468186 | Dong et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
| 20010000536 | Tarin | Apr 2001 | A1 |
| 20010011247 | O'Flaherty et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014878 | Mitra et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027413 | Bhutta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029470 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029482 | Tealdi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034618 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034631 | Kiselik | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037332 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039523 | Iwamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039532 | Coleman, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010042785 | Walker et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044729 | Pomerance | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044756 | Watkins et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049274 | Degraeve | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049620 | Blasko | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004736 | Roundtree et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004774 | Defarlo | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010594 | Levine | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010664 | Rabideau et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010701 | Kosciuszko | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013827 | Edstrom et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026507 | Sears et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026519 | Itabashi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032635 | Harris et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032645 | Nozaki et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032647 | Delinsky et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020033846 | Balasubramanian et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035511 | Haji et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035520 | Weiss | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042763 | Pillay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049624 | Raveis, Jr. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049701 | Nabe et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049738 | Epstein | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052836 | Galperin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052841 | Guthrie et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052884 | Farber et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055869 | Hegg | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069122 | Yun et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077964 | Brody et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087460 | Hornung | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091635 | Dilip et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091650 | Ellis | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091706 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099628 | Takaoka et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099635 | Guiragosian | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099641 | Mills et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099824 | Bender et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099936 | Kou et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103809 | Starzl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103933 | Garon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107765 | Walker | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107849 | Hickey et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111816 | Lortscher et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111890 | Sloan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111910 | Walsh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116247 | Tucker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119824 | Allen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120757 | Sutherland et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128962 | Kasower | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131565 | Scheuring et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133365 | Grey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133462 | Shteyn | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133504 | Vlahos et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138297 | Lee | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138445 | Laage et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138470 | Zhou | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143943 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147617 | Schoenbaum et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147669 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147695 | Khedkar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147801 | Gullotta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152166 | Dutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156676 | Ahrens et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156797 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161496 | Yamaki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161664 | Shaya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165757 | Lisser | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165839 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169747 | Chapman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173984 | Robertson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173994 | Ferguson, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174048 | Dheer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184054 | Cox et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184255 | Edd et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188478 | Breeland et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188544 | Wizon et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194103 | Nabe | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194117 | Nabe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194120 | Russell et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198736 | Harrison | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198800 | Shamrakov | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198806 | Blagg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198824 | Cook | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198830 | Randell et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002671 | Inchalik et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009415 | Lutnick et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009418 | Green et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009426 | Ruiz-Sanchez | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014336 | Dao et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018549 | Fei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018558 | Heffner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018578 | Schultz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023531 | Fergusson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030027635 | Walker et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028402 | Ulrich et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028477 | Stevenson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036926 | Starkey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036995 | Lazerson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037054 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041019 | Vagim, III et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041031 | Hedy | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041050 | Smith et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046112 | Dutta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046222 | Bard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046311 | Baidya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050795 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050796 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050882 | Degen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055931 | Cravo De Almeida et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064705 | Desierio | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065563 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069839 | Whittington et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069943 | Bahrs et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078877 | Beirne et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078897 | Florance et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097342 | Whittingtom | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097380 | Mulhern et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101111 | Dang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101344 | Wheeler et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105728 | Yano et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105733 | Boreham | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105742 | Boreham et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110111 | Nalebuff et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115122 | Slater et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126072 | Brock | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135451 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153299 | Perfit et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154162 | Danaher et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158749 | Olchanski et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158776 | Landesmann | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158960 | Engberg | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163416 | Kitajima | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163435 | Payone | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163483 | Zingher et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163513 | Schaeck et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171942 | Gaito | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172039 | Guy | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187780 | Arthus et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191731 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195830 | Merkoulovitch et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195859 | Lawrence | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200151 | Ellenson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204429 | Botscheck et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204752 | Garrison | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208412 | Hillestad et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212618 | Keyes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212654 | Harper et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220858 | Lam et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229507 | Perge | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229580 | Gass et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229892 | Sardera | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233259 | Mistretta et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236738 | Lange et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006488 | Fitall et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040006536 | Kawashima et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010443 | May et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010458 | Friedman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019799 | Vering et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023637 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024709 | Yu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030621 | Cobb | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030629 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030649 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030667 | Xu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039688 | Sulkowski et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044563 | Stein | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044615 | Xue et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044617 | Lu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044673 | Brady et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049473 | Gower et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040050928 | Bishop et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052357 | Logan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054619 | Watson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064402 | Dreyer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073456 | Gottlieb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078323 | Johnston et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078324 | Lonnberg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083215 | de Jong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083482 | Makagon et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088237 | Moenickheim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088255 | Zielke et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098625 | Lagadec et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107250 | Marciano | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111292 | Hutchins | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111305 | Gavan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111358 | Lange et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111359 | Hudock | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111363 | Trench et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117235 | Shacham | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117302 | Weichert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117358 | Von Kaenel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122696 | Beringer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128150 | Lundegren | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128156 | Beringer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128227 | Whipple et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128230 | Oppenheimer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133493 | Ford et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133509 | McCoy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133513 | McCoy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133515 | McCoy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138994 | DeFrancesco et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138995 | Hershkowitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139025 | Coleman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141005 | Banatwala et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143546 | Wood et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143596 | Sirkin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153330 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153437 | Buchan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153448 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153521 | Kogo | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158521 | Newton | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158523 | Dort | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158723 | Root | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159700 | Khan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167793 | Masuoka et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176995 | Fusz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177030 | Shoham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177114 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186807 | Nathans et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193535 | Barazesh | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193538 | Raines | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199456 | Flint et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199458 | Ho | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199462 | Starrs | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199789 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204948 | Singletary et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215553 | Gang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215554 | Kemper et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215555 | Kemper et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215556 | Merkley, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215584 | Yao | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220865 | Lozowski et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220896 | Finlay et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220918 | Scriffignano et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221043 | Su et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225099 | Hohberg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225545 | Turner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225594 | Nolan, III et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225596 | Kemper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225597 | Oppenheimer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225643 | Alpha et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230534 | McGough | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243450 | Bernard, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243506 | Das | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243588 | Tanner et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249532 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254935 | Chagoly et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255127 | Arnouse | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267660 | Greenwood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267714 | Frid et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004855 | Jenson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004870 | McGaughey | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050005168 | Dick | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010513 | Duckworth et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010555 | Gallivan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021476 | Candella et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027633 | Fortuna et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027983 | Klawon | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027995 | Menschik et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038737 | Norris | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049991 | Aggarwal | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055231 | Lee | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055275 | Newman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050058262 | Timmins et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060332 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071328 | Lawrence | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080697 | Foss et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080821 | Breil et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086071 | Fox, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086072 | Fox, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086126 | Patterson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086176 | Dahlgren | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086261 | Mammone | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091164 | Varble | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097017 | Hanratty | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097039 | Kulcsar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097320 | Golan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102180 | Gailey et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102206 | Savasoglu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102226 | Oppenheimer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050105719 | Huda | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108396 | Bittner | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108631 | Amorin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113991 | Rogers et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114335 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114344 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114345 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125291 | Demkiw Grayson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125350 | Tidwell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125397 | Gross et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130704 | McParland et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137899 | Davies et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137912 | Rao et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137963 | Ricketts et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154617 | Ruggieri et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154664 | Guy et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154665 | Kerr | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154769 | Eckart et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187948 | Monitzer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192008 | Desai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193093 | Mathew et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197953 | Broadbent et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203768 | Florance | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208461 | Krebs et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209880 | Drelicharz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209922 | Hofmeister | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216953 | Ellingson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226224 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228748 | Togher et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246338 | Bird | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251474 | Shinn et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257250 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262158 | Sauermann | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267840 | Holm-Blagg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273423 | Kiai et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273431 | Abel et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273849 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276401 | Madill et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050279827 | Mascavage et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288998 | Verma et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289003 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060014129 | Coleman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015425 | Brooks | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020611 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029107 | McCullough et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031158 | Orman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060032909 | Seegar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036543 | Blagg et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036748 | Nusbaum et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041670 | Musseleck et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059073 | Walzak | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059086 | Mulhern | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069635 | Ram et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074793 | Hibbert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074991 | Lussier et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079211 | Degraeve | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080139 | Mainzer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080233 | Mendelovich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080251 | Fried et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085334 | Murphy | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085361 | Hoerle et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085454 | Blegen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089842 | Medawar | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095363 | May | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100944 | Reddin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100954 | Schoen | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106670 | Cai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123461 | Lunt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129419 | Flaxer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060131390 | Kim | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136330 | DeRoy et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136595 | Satyavolu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149674 | Cook et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155573 | Hartunian | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155639 | Lynch et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155780 | Sakairi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161554 | Lucovsky et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163347 | Foss et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173772 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177226 | Ellis | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178971 | Owen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178983 | Nice et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179050 | Giang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184410 | Ramamurthy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184440 | Britti et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184585 | Grear et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195351 | Bayburtian | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195688 | Drissi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060202012 | Grano et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204051 | Holland, IV | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212386 | Willey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212407 | Lyon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229799 | Nimmo et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229943 | Mathias et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229961 | Lyftogt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229996 | Keithley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233332 | Toms | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235743 | Long et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235935 | Ng | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241923 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242046 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242047 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259364 | Strock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265323 | Winter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060267999 | Cash et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271457 | Romain et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271633 | Adler | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276171 | Pousti | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277089 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277092 | Williams | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277141 | Palmer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060278704 | Saunders et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282359 | Nobili et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282429 | Hernandez-Sherrington et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282819 | Graham et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287764 | Kraft | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287766 | Kraft | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287767 | Kraft | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288090 | Kraft | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293932 | Cash et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294199 | Bertholf | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070011020 | Martin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070011030 | Bregante et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070011032 | Bregante et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070011083 | Bird et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016500 | Chatterji et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016501 | Chatterji et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016517 | Solomon | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016518 | Atkinson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016520 | Gang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022141 | Singleton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027778 | Schellhammer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030282 | Cash et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038483 | Wood | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038497 | Britti et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038568 | Greene et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043654 | Libman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045402 | Rothschild | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045405 | Rothschild | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047714 | Baniak et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067207 | Haggerty et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067285 | Blume et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067297 | Kublickis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067437 | Sindambiwe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078741 | Haggerty et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083460 | Bachenheimer | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083463 | Kraft | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088950 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093234 | Willis et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094137 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094230 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094241 | Blackwell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094264 | Nair | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106582 | Baker et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112668 | Celano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118393 | Rosen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118410 | Nadal | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127702 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130070 | Williams | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156554 | Nikoley et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156589 | Zimler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156692 | Rosewarne | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156718 | Hossfeld et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162414 | Horowitz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168267 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179798 | Inbarajan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185797 | Robinson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192121 | Routson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192122 | Routson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192347 | Rossmark et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198336 | Thompson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198407 | Winter | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204338 | Aiello et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208640 | Banasiak et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214000 | Shahrabi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220611 | Socolow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226010 | Larsen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226047 | Ward | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226093 | Chan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226114 | Haggerty et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226129 | Liao et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233591 | Newton | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244732 | Chatterji et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244782 | Chimento | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250441 | Paulsen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250459 | Schwarz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255654 | Whipple et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255655 | Kemper et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258626 | Reiner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260539 | Delinsky | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261114 | Pomerantsev | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070262137 | Brown | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266439 | Kraft | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279187 | Hekmatpour et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282730 | Carpenter et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282736 | Conlin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070284433 | Domenica et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288338 | Hoadley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288360 | Seeklus | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294195 | Curry et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294431 | Adelman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299699 | Policelli et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299759 | Kelly | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299770 | Delinsky | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299771 | Brody | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080010203 | Grant | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010206 | Coleman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015979 | Bentley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021804 | Deckoff | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022281 | Dubhashi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027858 | Benson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033742 | Bernasconi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033750 | Burriss et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033956 | Saha et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046351 | Wiener et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052182 | Marshall | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052224 | Parker | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052244 | Tsuei et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059224 | Schechter | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059317 | Chandran et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059352 | Chandran | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059364 | Tidwell et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059449 | Webster et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065530 | Talbert et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080072316 | Chang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082536 | Schwabe et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086400 | Ardelean et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091519 | Foss | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097768 | Godshalk | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103959 | Carroll et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103972 | Lanc | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109315 | Huang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109740 | Prinsen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109875 | Kraft | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115191 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120133 | Krishnaswami et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120569 | Mann et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133322 | Kalla et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140507 | Hamlisch et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162383 | Kraft | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172324 | Johnson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177655 | Zalik | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183504 | Highley | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183564 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080184270 | Cole et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189202 | Zadoorian et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195548 | Chu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195600 | Deakter | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201257 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201401 | Pugh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205655 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205774 | Brinker et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208610 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208631 | Morita et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208726 | Tsantes et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208735 | Balet et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208873 | Boehmer | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216156 | Kosaka | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221972 | Megdal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222015 | Megdal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222027 | Megdal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222706 | Renaud et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080244008 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080249869 | Angell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255922 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263058 | Peden | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270209 | Mauseth et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270294 | Lent et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270295 | Lent et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288283 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294501 | Rennich et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294540 | Celka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301016 | Durvasula et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301188 | O'Hara | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306750 | Wunder et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312969 | Raines et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319832 | Liebe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319889 | Hammad | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319909 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320575 | Gelb et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090006475 | Udezue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090007231 | Kaiser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090012889 | Finch | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018986 | Alcorn et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018996 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024428 | Hudock, Jr. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024505 | Patel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030776 | Walker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031426 | Dal Lago et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090043691 | Kasower | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044279 | Crawford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090048877 | Binns et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090048957 | Celano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055322 | Bykov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055894 | Lorsch | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060343 | Rosea | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089190 | Girulat | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094064 | Tyler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094237 | Churl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094674 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099960 | Robida et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106846 | Dupray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112650 | Iwane | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113532 | Lapidous | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119169 | Chandratillake et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119199 | Salahi | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119299 | Rhodes | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132347 | Anderson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138335 | Lieberman | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144102 | Lopez | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144160 | Haggerty et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150166 | Leite et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150238 | Marsh et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158030 | Rasti | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164232 | Chmielewski et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164380 | Brown | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171723 | Jenkins | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172815 | Gu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182661 | Irwin | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183259 | Rinek et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210807 | Xiao et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210886 | Bhojwani et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216591 | Buerger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216640 | Masi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222308 | Zoldi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222379 | Choudhuri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222449 | Hom et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228918 | Rolff et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234665 | Conkel | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234775 | Whitney et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234876 | Schigel et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240609 | Cho et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240624 | James et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248573 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090249440 | Platt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254375 | Martinez et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254656 | Vignisson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254971 | Herz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271248 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271265 | Lay et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276244 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090289110 | Regen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313049 | Joao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313562 | Appleyard et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327120 | Eze et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090328173 | Jakobson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100009320 | Wilkelis | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100009663 | Chang | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100010935 | Shelton | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011428 | Atwood et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023434 | Bond | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023448 | Eze | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030578 | Siddique et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030677 | Melik-Aslanian et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037299 | Karasick et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042517 | Paintin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042583 | Gervais | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049803 | Ogilvie et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082476 | Bowman | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094704 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114724 | Ghosh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114744 | Gonen | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122316 | Lyon | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142698 | Spottiswoode et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145836 | Baker et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153707 | Lentz, II | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169159 | Rose et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169264 | O'Sullivan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174638 | Debie et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185546 | Pollard | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188684 | Kumara | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205076 | Parson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205087 | Hubler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211445 | Bodington | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211636 | Starkenburg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223168 | Haggerty et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228658 | Ketelsen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100248681 | Phills | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250338 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250410 | Song et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250411 | Rodski | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250497 | Redlich et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250509 | Andersen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100253686 | Alsbury et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100257102 | Perlman | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262535 | Lent et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100268660 | Ekdahl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100293090 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299251 | Thomas | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299252 | Thomas | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299260 | Thomas | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299262 | Handler | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324986 | Thomas | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325035 | Hilgers et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325036 | Thomas | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004514 | Thomas | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110004546 | Thomas | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110009707 | Kaundinya et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016042 | Cho et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110023115 | Wright | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029427 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035315 | Langley | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040736 | Kalaboukis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054981 | Faith et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060654 | Elliott et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060673 | Delinsky et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078073 | Annappindi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110113084 | Ramnani | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110113086 | Long et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125595 | Neal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125632 | Neel | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126275 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131123 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131131 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137760 | Rudie et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137789 | Kortina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142213 | Baniak et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161218 | Swift | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164746 | Nice et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166988 | Coulter | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173116 | Yan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178841 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178899 | Huszar | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178922 | Imrey et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179139 | Starkenburg et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184838 | Winters et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110196791 | Dominguez | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202474 | Mele et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110211445 | Chen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219421 | Ullman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238566 | Santos | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258050 | Chan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264566 | Brown | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270779 | Showalter | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270925 | Mina | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282779 | Megdal et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295733 | Megdal et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120005070 | McFall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120011056 | Ward et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023011 | Hurwitz | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029956 | Ghosh et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120030216 | Churl et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120030771 | Pierson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054592 | Jaffe et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066065 | Switzer | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066084 | Sneyders | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066106 | Papadimitriou | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072464 | Cohen | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101938 | Kasower | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101939 | Kasower | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120106801 | Jackson | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108274 | Acebo Ruiz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120109990 | Yamasaki | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110467 | Blake et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120116951 | Chung et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117509 | Powell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123931 | Megdal et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123942 | Song et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124498 | Santoro et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136763 | Megdal et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136774 | Imrey et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150587 | Kruger et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158460 | Kruger et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158574 | Brunzell et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158654 | Behren et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173339 | Flynt et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173406 | Fei et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173417 | Lohman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179536 | Kalb et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198556 | Patel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120204026 | Shi et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215682 | Lent et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216125 | Pierce | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226916 | Hahn et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232958 | Silbert | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239553 | Gonen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239583 | Dobrowolski | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120246060 | Conyack, Jr. et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120253852 | Pourfallah et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120254018 | Davies et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265607 | Belwadi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265661 | Megdal et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278227 | Kolo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278767 | Stibel et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284118 | Mamich, Jr. et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290660 | Rao et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317016 | Hughes | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120324388 | Rao et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006825 | Robida et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130018811 | Britti et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031109 | Roulson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031113 | Feng et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031624 | Britti et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060603 | Wagner | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066775 | Milam | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130103571 | Chung et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110565 | Means et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117087 | Coppinger | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124263 | Amaro et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124392 | Achanta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130125010 | Strandell | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132151 | Stibel et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130159168 | Evans | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173447 | Rothschild | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173449 | Ng et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173451 | Kornegay et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173481 | Hirtenstein et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185293 | Boback | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191261 | Chandler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130205135 | Lutz | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211986 | Debie et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226783 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268357 | Heath | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130279676 | Baniak et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293363 | Plymouth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332338 | Yan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332341 | Papadimitriou | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332342 | Kasower | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332467 | Bornea et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130339249 | Weller et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140012734 | Megdal et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025562 | Rothrock et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032265 | Paprocki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032300 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032723 | Nema | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140040182 | Gilder et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140061302 | Hammad | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074689 | Lund et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140089167 | Kasower | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140110477 | Hammad | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140136422 | Jung et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156500 | Lassen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156501 | Howe | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156503 | Lassen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140157375 | Britti et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140164112 | Kala | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140164519 | Shah | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172687 | Chirehdast | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140244353 | Winters | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140258083 | Achanta et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140258089 | Pearson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140279329 | Dancel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140304263 | Vaitheeswaran et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316969 | Imrey | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324655 | Kolathur | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150026014 | Kasower | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150066772 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150228016 | Chandler | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150254329 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150269506 | Britti et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150278277 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150278944 | Searson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150287091 | Koran | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150295906 | Ufford et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150310543 | DeBie | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150326580 | McMillan et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150339769 | deOliveira et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160004728 | Balet et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160048700 | Stransky-Heilkron | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160055487 | Votaw et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160071175 | Reuss et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160092997 | Shen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160227037 | Roybal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160328476 | Chang et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160342999 | Rouston et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170041296 | Ford et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170046526 | Chan et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170046652 | Haldenby et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170046664 | Haldenby et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170046693 | Haldenby et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170048021 | Yanovsky et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170061138 | Lambert | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170098096 | Redberg | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170109735 | Sheng et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170177809 | Bull et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170200223 | Kasower | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170228820 | Rohn | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170249481 | Edison | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170262821 | Imrey et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170278182 | Kasower | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20180060596 | Hamel et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180060600 | Hamel et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180062835 | Hamel et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180075527 | Nagla et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180089379 | Collins et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180150599 | Valdes et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180183768 | Lobban et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180205707 | Bellala et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180218069 | Rege et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180239914 | Chen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180253702 | Dowding | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180276222 | Belknap et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180276661 | van Wingerden | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180302215 | Salgueiro et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180309567 | Wooden | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180330516 | Baca et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180343265 | McMillan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190065516 | Barker | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190188717 | Putnam et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190251558 | Liu et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190318122 | Hockey et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190347627 | Lin et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190356672 | Bondugula et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200074109 | Pieniazek et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200089905 | Jones et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200106764 | Hockey et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200106765 | Hockey et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200143363 | Schmidt | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200153627 | Wentz | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200201878 | Putnam et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200210492 | Chang et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200211103 | Searson et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200213206 | Bracken et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200219181 | Kasower | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200226284 | Yin | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200265155 | Dong et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200279053 | Jones et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200285679 | Chen et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200327150 | Kunjur et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200327560 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200364246 | Farrell | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200387634 | Jones et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200394675 | Bradford | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210004373 | Sankaran et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210034613 | Ng et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210042366 | Hicklin et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210064725 | Miller et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210065160 | Butvin et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210158299 | Baggett | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210158368 | Baggett | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210357707 | Bondugula et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
| 20210400120 | Prieditis | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20220019733 | Billman et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220027853 | McMillan et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220070294 | Cody et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| 20220156394 | Riley et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220222368 | Min et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2004220812 | Sep 2004 | AU |
| 2010200017 | Jan 2010 | AU |
| 2022204452 | Jul 2022 | AU |
| 2 611 595 | Dec 2006 | CA |
| 2 868 933 | Oct 2013 | CA |
| 3 060 136 | May 2020 | CA |
| 2 792 070 | Oct 2021 | CA |
| 1290373 | Apr 2001 | CN |
| 101452555 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 102096886 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 102663650 | Sep 2012 | CN |
| 106255985 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 112036952 | Dec 2020 | CN |
| 0 350 907 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0 419 889 | Apr 1991 | EP |
| 0 458 698 | Nov 1991 | EP |
| 0 468 440 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 554 083 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 566 736 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 559 358 | Sep 1993 | EP |
| 0 869 652 | Oct 1998 | EP |
| 0 913 789 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0 919 942 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0 977 128 | Feb 2000 | EP |
| 1 028 401 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 0 772 836 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1 850 278 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1 988 501 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 3 201 804 | Apr 2020 | EP |
| 3 846 104 | Jul 2021 | EP |
| 2 752 058 | Apr 2020 | ES |
| 1 322 809 | Jul 1973 | GB |
| 349972 | Apr 2016 | IN |
| 10-222559 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 10-261009 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 10-293732 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 2000-331068 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2001-282957 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2001-297141 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2001-344463 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2001-357256 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002-149778 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002-163449 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002-163498 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002-259753 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2003-016261 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003-271851 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2003-316881 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2003-316950 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 10-2000-0036594 | Jul 2000 | KR |
| 10-2000-0063995 | Nov 2000 | KR |
| 10-2001-0016349 | Mar 2001 | KR |
| 10-2001-0035145 | May 2001 | KR |
| 10-2002-0007132 | Jan 2002 | KR |
| 10-2004-0078798 | Sep 2004 | KR |
| 10-2013-0107394 | Oct 2013 | KR |
| 2007-015510 | Apr 2008 | MX |
| 2 181 216 | Apr 2002 | RU |
| I256569 | Jun 2006 | TW |
| WO 94012943 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO 95012857 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO 95034155 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 96000945 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| WO 98041931 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 98041932 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 98041933 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 98049643 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 99017225 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 99017226 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 99038094 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 99046710 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 00004465 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 00011574 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 00028441 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 00055778 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 00065469 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 01004821 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 01009752 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 01009792 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 01010090 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 01016896 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 01039090 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 01039589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 01041083 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 01041355 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 01057720 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 01080053 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 01084281 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 02013047 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 02071176 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 2004031986 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004084098 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004088464 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004114160 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005022348 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005059781 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005124619 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006050278 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006099081 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006099492 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006135451 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007004158 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007106393 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007106786 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007106787 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008021061 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008022289 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008042614 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008054403 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008127288 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008147918 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009061342 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009064840 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009076555 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009099448 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009117468 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009117518 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010129257 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010132492 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2013009920 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013066633 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014018900 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014066816 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014088895 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014137759 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015057538 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2018144612 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018236732 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| WO 2019089439 | May 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019136407 | Jul 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019157491 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019183483 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| WO 2020146667 | Jul 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020198236 | Oct 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020232137 | Nov 2020 | WO |
| WO 2021081516 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| WO 2022109613 | May 2022 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Official Communication in Indian Patent Application No. 201917029540, dated Jan. 7, 2022. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP12747205, dated Feb. 11, 2022. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2020/012976, dated Jul. 22, 2021. |
| Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2018215082, dated Jan. 21, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/885,239, 2018/0218069, Massive Scale Heterogeneous Data Ingestion and User Resolution, filed Jan. 31, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,489, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,511, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al. |
| “A New Approach to Fraud Solutions”, BasePoint Science Solving Fraud, pp. 8, 2006. |
| Abrahams, Steven W., “The New View in Mortgage Prepayments: Insight from Analysis at the Loan-By-Loan Level,” The Journal of Fixed Income, Jun. 1997, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 8-21. |
| “ACS Company Birch & Davis Wins Texas CHIP Contract,” PR Newswire, Section: Financial News, May 17, 2000, Dallas, TX, pp. 3. |
| Actuate, “Delivering Enterprise Information for Corporate Portals”, White Paper, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
| Aharony et al., “Social Area Networks: Data Networking of the People, by the People, for the People,” 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, May 2009, pp. 1148-1155. |
| Akl, Selim G., “Digital Signatures: A Tutorial Survey,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 15-24. |
| Aktas et al., “Personalizing PageRank Based on Domain Profiles”, WEBKDD workshop: Webmining and Web Usage Analysis, Aug. 22, 2004, pp. 83-90. |
| Aktas et al., “Using Hyperlink Features to Personalize Web Search”, WEBKDD workshop: Webmining and Web Usage Analysis, Aug. 2004. |
| “An Even Better Solution to Financing Elective Surgery . . . ”, Unicorn Financial, pp. 7, http://web.archive.org/web/20000816161359/http://www.unicornfinancial.com/, as downloaded Oct. 15, 2008. |
| Apte, et al., “A Probabilistic Estimation Framework for Predictive Modeling Analytics,” IBM Systems Journal, 2002, vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 438-448. |
| “Authorizing Safety Net Public Health Programs,” Hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, First Session, Serial No. 107-57, dated Aug. 1, 2001, 226 pgs. |
| AISG's National Underwriting Database, A-PLUS, is Now the Largest in the Industry, Business Wire, Aug. 7, 1997. |
| An Expert System for Determining Medicaid Eligibility, Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 12, Nov. 5, 1988, in 10 pages. |
| Announcing TrueProfiler, http://web.archive.org/web/20021201123646/http://www.truecredit.com/index.asp, dated Dec. 1, 2002, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, “Credit-Report Disputes Await Electronic Resolution,” Credit Card News, Chicago, Jan. 15, 1993, vol. 5, No. 19, p. 5. |
| Anonymous, “MBNA Offers Resolution of Credit Card Disputes,” Hempstead, Feb. 2002, vol. 68, No. 2, p. 47. |
| Antonopoulos, Andreas M., “Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Crypto-Currencies”, O'Reilly, Dec. 2014, First Edition, pp. 282. |
| “AT&T Expected to Turn Up Heat in Card Wars”, American Banker, May 27, 1993, vol. 158, No. 101, pp. 3. |
| Avery et al., “Consumer Credit Scoring: Do Situational Circumstances Matter?”, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 28, 2004, pp. 835-856. |
| Awoonor-Williams, Princess Josephine, Ph.D. “Gender and Credit: An Analysis of Women's Experience in the Credit Market”, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, May 2004, pp. 148. |
| Babcock, Gwen, “Aggregation Without Aggravation: Determining Spatial Contiguity and Joining Geographic Areas Using Hashing”, SAS Global Forum 2010, Reporting and Information Visualization, Paper 223-2010, pp. 17. |
| “Balance Transfers Offer Opportunities”, Risk Credit Risk Management Report, Jan. 29, 1996, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 2. |
| Bancroft, John, “Tools Help Managers with Risk Management,” Real Estate Finance Today, May 26, 1997, pp. 11-12. |
| “Bank of America Direct Web-Based Network Adds Core Functionality To Meet Day-To-Day Treasury Needs”, Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999. pp. 2. |
| Barone, Robert P., “The Integrated Approach to Branch Service Delivery,” American Banker, Aug. 6, 1991, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-11128400.html. |
| Barry, Ellen, “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Lipo,” The Boston Phoenix, News & Opinion, dated Apr. 6, 1998, as downloaded at http://weeklywire.com/ww/04-06-98/boston_feature_1.html (1 of 12) [Oct. 15, 2008 2:35:25 PM]. |
| Belford, Terrence, “Technology Quarterly: Computers, Internet Speeds Credit Checks System Tailored for Doctors, Dentists,” The Globe and Mail (Canada), Section: Report on Business Special Reports, p. C10, Mar. 18, 1997. |
| “Beverly Hills Man Convicted of Operating ‘Bust-Out’ Schemes that Caused More than $8 Million in Losses”, Department of Justice, Jul. 25, 2006, 2 Pgs. |
| Bienkowski, Nik, “A New Tool for Portfolio Risk Management—Gold Bullion”, Apr. 2003, pp. 6. |
| Bilotta, Caryn, “Understanding Credit Scores,” Pittsburgh Post—Gazette, May 9, 2010. |
| “Birch & Davis Wins Texas CHIP Contract,” Birch & Davis Press Release, dated Jan. 4, 2000, 3 pgs., as downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20010304065515/www.birchdavis.com/txchip.htm (1 of 3) [Oct. 20, 2008 9:49:18 AM]. |
| Bitran et al., “Mailing Decisions in Catalog Sales Industry”, Management Science (JSTOR), vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1364-1381, Sep. 1996. |
| Boss, Shira J. “Elective Surgery Without the Plastic: Low-Interest Medical Financing Provides Alternative to Credit Cards,” factiva, Crain's New York Business, 2 pgs., dated Jun. 22, 1998. |
| Brick, et al. “Unit and Item Response, Weighting, and Imputation Procedures in the 1993 National Household Education Survey (NHES:93)” U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, Working Paper No. 97-05, Washington, D.C., pp. 30, Feb. 1997. |
| Broward County CAP Grant Application, as printed on Aug. 10, 2009, 41 pgs. |
| Brown et al., “ALCOD IDSS: Assisting the Australian Stock Market Surveillance Team's Review Process,” Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, Dec. 1, 1996, pp. 625-641. |
| Burr Ph.D., et al., “Utility Payments as Alternative Credit Data: A Reality Check”, Asset Builders of America, Inc., Oct. 5, 2006, pp. 1-18, Washington, D.C. |
| “Bust-Out Schemes”, Visual Analytics Inc. Technical Product Support, Newsletter vol. 4, Issue 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 7. |
| Buxfer, http://www.buxfer.com/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 1 page. |
| Cáceres, et al., “Measurement and Analysis of IP Network Usage and Behavior”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 144-151, May 2000. |
| Calnan, Christopher, “Tenet, Fair Isaac invest $20M in startup,” MHT, Mass High Tech: The Journal of New England Technology, dated Jul. 23, 2007, 2 pgs. |
| Cantor, R. and Packer, F., “The Credit Rating Industry,” FRBNY Quarterly Review, Summer-Fall, 1994, pp. 1-24. |
| Capps et al., “Recent Changes in Texas Welfare and Work, Child Care and Child Welfare Systems,” Assessing the New Federalism, The Urban Institute, State Update No. 1, 24 pgs., Jun. 2001. |
| CAPStone Newsletter, Sep. 2001, 8 pgs., as downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20011213115738/www.capcommunity.hrsa.gov/Newsletter/Newsletter12.htm (1 of 8) [Oct. 18, 2008 2:39:47 PM]. |
| Card Marketing, Use the Latest CRM Tools and Techniques, www.CardForum.com, vol. 5 No. 10, Dec. 2001. |
| Census Geography, Excerpted from the Geographic Reference Manual, Nov. 1994, pp. 5. |
| “Chase Gets Positive,” Bank Technology News, May 6, 2000, vol. 14, No. 5, p. 33. |
| Chatterjee et al., “Expenditure Patterns and Aggregate Consumer Behavior, Some Experiments with Australian and New Zealand Data”, The Economic Record, vol. 70, No. 210, Sep. 1994, pp. 278-291. |
| Check, http://check.me/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 3 pages. |
| Cheney, Karen, “Fix Your Nose, If You Wish, But Not With This New Loan,” Money Magazine, vol. 27, No. 5, 1 pg., dated May 1, 1998. |
| Chiba et al., “Mobility Management Schemes for Heterogeneity Support in Next Generation Wireless Networks”, 3rd EuroNGI Conference on, 2007, pp. 143-150. |
| Chores & Allowances, “Do Kids Have Credit Reports?” Oct. 15, 2007, http://choresandallowances.blogspot.com/2007/10/do-kids-have-credit-reports.html, pp. 5. |
| CISCO: What-If Simulator, http://www.ciscocredit.com/whatifsim.html printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages. |
| CISCO: Your Mortgage Credit Reporting Specialists, http://www.ciscocredit.com/cc_Services.html printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 4 pages. |
| “Cole Taylor Bank Chooses Integrated E-Banking/E-Payments/Reconciliation Solution From Fundtech”, Business Wire, Oct. 21, 1999, pp. 2. |
| “Consumer Reports Finds American-Made Vehicles Close Reliability Gap with European-Made Vehicle—As Japanese Continue to Set New Benchmarks for the Industry”, Consumer Reports: Consumers Union, Yonkers, NY, Apr. 2003, pp. 2. |
| Corepoint Health, “The Continuity of Care Document—Changing the Landscape of Healthcare Information Exchange,” Jan. 2009, pp. 9. |
| CreditAnalyst, Digital Matrix Systems, as printed out Mar. 4, 2008, pp. 2. |
| CreditSesame; “FAQ's”; http://www.creditsesame.Com/how-we-help/faqs/#cb printed Dec. 5, 2011 in 8 pages. |
| CreditSesame; “Promote Your Financial Responsibility to Get an Edge in Life”; http://www.creditsesame.com/credit-badge/printed Dec. 2, 2011 in 1 page. |
| Credittoolkit, Digital Matrix Systems, as printed out Mar. 4, 2008, pp. 2. |
| CreditXpert, http://www.creditxpert.com/Products/individuals.asp printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 1 page. |
| “Credit Information Bureaus and ‘CIBIL’”, http://www.icicibank.com/cibil.html printed Aug. 22, 2012 in 3 pages. |
| CreditKarma: How Credit Karma Works, http://www.creditkarma.com/help/howitworks printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages. |
| Credit Source Online: The Secrets of Raising Your Credit Score, http://www.creditsourceonline.com/secrets-of-raising-your-credit-score.html printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 4 pages. |
| Cohen et al., “Optimizer: IBM's Multi Echelon Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics”, Interfaces, vol. 20, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1990, pp. 65-82. |
| ComScore Networks Launches Business Unit to Help Credit Card Marketers Master Online and Multi-Channel Strategies—Solutions Provide Unprecedented Insight Into Customer Acquisition and Usage Opportunities, Reston, VA, Oct. 11, 2001, 2 pages. |
| “Consumers Gain Immediate and Full Access to Credit Score Used by Majority of U.S. Lenders”, PR Newswire, ProQuest Copy, Mar. 19, 2001, p. 1. |
| Credit Card Management, “Neural Nets Shoot for Jackpot,” Dec. 1995, pp. 1-6. |
| “Creditcheck Monitoring Services,” Dec. 11, 2000, pp. 1, lines 21-23. |
| Credit Risk Management Report, Potomac, Mar. 9, 1998, vol. 8, No. 4. |
| CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert 3-Bureau Comparison™, 2002, pp. 5, as archived Jun. 8, 2003 from http://web.archive.org/web/20030608171018/http://cred itxpert.com/CreditXpert%203-Bureau%20Comparison(TM)%20sample.pdf. |
| CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Credit Score & Analysis™, Jan. 11, 2000, pp. 6, http://web.archive.org/web/20030611070058/http://www.creditxpert.com/CreditXpert%20Score%20&%20Analysis%20and%20Credit%20Wizard%20sample.pdf. |
| CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Essentials™, Advisor View-Experian on Jul. 7, 2003, http://www.creditxpert.com/cx_ess_app.pdf. |
| CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Essentials™, Advisor View-TransUnion on Oct. 10, 1999, pp. 6, http://web.archive.org/web/20041211052543/http://creditxpert.com/cx_ess_app.pdf. |
| CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Essentials™, Applicant View-TransUnion on Oct. 10, 1999, pp. 6, http://www.creditxpert.com/cx_ess_app.pdf. |
| CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert What-If Simulator™, 2002, pp. 8, as archived Jun. 30, 2003 from http://web.archive.org/web/20030630132914/http://creditxpert.com/CreditXpert%20What-If%20Simulator(TM)%20sample.pdf. |
| “D&B Corporate Family Linkage”, D&B Internet Access for U.S. Contract Customers, https://www.dnb.com/ecomp/help/linkage.htm as printed Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 1. |
| Dankar et al., “Efficient Private Information Retrieval for Geographical Aggregation”, Procedia Computer Science, 2014, vol. 37, pp. 497-502. |
| Dash, Julekha, “Java on the Street,” Software Magazine, Oct. 1, 1997, vol. 17, No. 11, p. 2. |
| Dataman Group, “Summarized Credit Statistics,” Aug. 22, 2001, http://web.archive.org/web/20010822113446/http://www.datamangroup.com/summarized_credit.asp. |
| “Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software”, http://www.symantec.com/data-loss-prevention/ printed Apr. 8, 2013 in 8 pages. |
| “Data Protection”, http://compliantprocessing.com/data-protection/ printed Apr. 8, 2013 in 4 pages. |
| David, Alexander, “Controlling Information Premia by Repackaging Asset-Backed Securities,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Dec. 1997, 26 pages. |
| Davies, Donald W., “Applying the RSA Digital Signature to Electronic Mail,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 55-62. |
| Davis, Lisa, “Safety in Numbers,” Business North Carolina, Sep. 1, 1995, vol. 15, No. 9, p. 24. |
| “Debt Settlement: Watch Video on how to Pay Your Debt Faster”, http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com/debt-settlement.html printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages. |
| Demby, Elayne, “Special Report: Letting Consumers Know the Score—and More”, Collections and Credit Risk, New York, Feb. 2003, vol. 8, Issue 2, p. 53, pp. 3. |
| DentalFinancing.com, “Financial services for patients and dental professionals,”, 7 pgs., as downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20010607151954/www.dentalfinancing.com/dentist/index.asp (1 of 2) [Oct. 15, 2008 3:55:16 PM]. |
| Department of Real Estate, http://web.archive.org/web/20040619190012/http://www.dre.ca.gov/pubs_sub.htm, Jun. 19, 2004, in 5 pages. |
| Department of Real Estate, “Reference Book,” http://web.archive.org/web/20041011063158/http://www.dre.ca.gov/pdf_docs/ref17.pdf, Jun. 18, 2004, Chapter 17, pp. 311-382. |
| DiBartolomeo, Dan, “Portfolio Optimization: The Robust Solution,” Prudential Securities Quantitative Conference, Dec. 21, 1993, pp. 8. |
| Dietz, Ellen, “Dental Office Management,” 8 pgs., pp. 316-321, Jul. 16, 1999. |
| Dillon et al., “Good Science”, Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management & Applications TM, Winter 1997, vol. 9, No. 4; pp. 11. |
| Downes et al., Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms, Fifth Edition, Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 332-333. |
| Downing, Jr.; Richard, “Changes to the Credit Reporting Act,” Mortgage Banking, Apr. 1, 1998, vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 82-85. |
| Dymi, Amilda, Need for Leads Spurs Some Upgrades, Origination News-Special Report, May 1, 2008, vol. vol. 17, Issue No. 8, pp. p. 24, Atlanta, Copyright 2008 SourceMedia, Inc. |
| Ecredable: Discover your AMP Credit Rating™, http://www.ecredable.com/how-it-works/amp-credit-rating printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages. |
| EFunds Introduces QualiFileSM, Deluxe Corporation, eFunds Press Release and Product Launch, Sep. 23, 1999, Milwaukee, WI. |
| Electronic Privacy Information Center, “The Fair Credit Reporting Act” 15 USC 1681 (1992), 10 pgs., as downloaded from http://epic.org/privacy/financial/fcra.html on Mar. 19, 2008. |
| Ellwood, Marilyn, “The Medicaid Eligibility Maze: Coverage Expands, but Enrollment Problems Persist, Findings from a Five-State Study,” Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Occasional Paper No. 30, 56 pgs., Dec. 1999. |
| Elmasri et al., “Fundamentals of Database Systems, Third Edition (Excerpts)”, Jun. 2000, pp. 253, 261, 268-70, 278-80, 585, 595. |
| Equifax: Consumer Bureau, http://www.equifax.co.in/financial-services/consumer_bureau/en_in#RiskScore printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 3 pages. |
| Equifax Consumer Credit Report http://www.equifax.com/home/, as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| Ettorre, “Paul Kahn on Exceptional Marketing,” Management Review, vol. 83, No. 11, Nov. 1994, pp. 48-51. |
| “Equifax and FICO Serve Consumers”, Mortgage Servicing News, Mar. 2001, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 19. |
| Expensr.com http://www.expensr.com/, as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| Experian, http://www.experian.com/printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 1 page. |
| Experian Announces PLUS Score; Experian Press Release dated Oct. 16, 2003; Experian Global Press Office. |
| Experian Consumer Credit Report http://www.experian.com/, as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| “Experian Helps Verify the Identity of Patients and Provide Secure Enrollment to Healthcare Portals by Integrating with Major Electronic Medical Records Platform,” http://press.experian.com/United-States/Press-Release/experian-helps-verify-the-identity-of-patients-and-provide-secure-enrollment-to-healthcare.aspx?&p=1, Dec. 19, 2013, pp. 2. |
| “Experian Launches Portfolio Monitor—Owner NoticesSM”, News Release, Feb. 2003, Costa Mesa, CA. |
| Experian-Scorex Announces New Credit Simulation Tool, PR Newswire, Costa Mesa, CA, Jun. 13, 2005. |
| Experian, Custom Strategist and Qualifile from Funds, Jun. 2000, in 2 pages. |
| Experian, “Enabling e-business”, White Paper, Jan. 2001, pp. 21. |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Credit Trends: Access Credit Trending Information Instantly, http://kewaneecreditbureau.com/Credit.Trends.pdf, Aug. 2000, pp. 4. |
| Experian, “Instant Prescreen: Offer preapproved credit at the point of sale”, Oct. 2000, pp. 2, http://www.cdillinois.com/pdf_file/instant_prescreen_ps.pdf. |
| Experian: Improve Outcomes Through Applied Customer Insight, Brochure, Nov. 2009, pp. 20. |
| Experian: Mosaic Geodemographic Lifestyle Segmentation on Consumerview [Data Card], as printed from http://datacards.experian.com/market?page=research/datacard_print&prin, Apr. 6, 2012, pp. 4. |
| Experian: Mosaic Public Sector 2009 Launch, Jul. 2009, pp. 164. |
| Experian: Mosaic United Kingdom, Brochure, Jun. 2009, pp. 24. |
| Experian: Mosaic UK—Optimise the Value of Your Customers and Locations, Now and in the Future, Brochure, Sep. 2010, pp. 24. |
| Experian: Mosaic UK—Unique Consumer Classification Based on In-Depth Demographic Data, as printed from http://www.experian.co.uk/business-strategies/mosaic-uk.html, Jul. 30, 2012, pp. 2. |
| Experian: Mosaic USA, Brochure, May 2009, pp. 14. |
| Experian: Mosaic USA—Consumer Lifestyle Segmentation [Data Card], Dec. 2009, pp. 2. |
| Experian: Public Sector, as printed form http://publicsector.experian.co.uk/Products/Mosaicpublicsector.aspx, Jul. 2009, pp. 2. |
| Experian, “Experian Rental Payment Data,” http://www.experian.com/rentbureau/rental-data.html printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| Fair Isaac Announces Integrated, End-to-End Collection and Recovery Solution, Business Wire, New York, Sep. 2, 2004, p. 1. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, my FICO Sample FICO Score Simulatorp. . . . |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Calculators: Credit Assessment, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/Calculators/CreditAssessment.aspx. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Help: FICO Score Simulator, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Help/Simulator.aspx?fire=5. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO Kit Platinum, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 4 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Description.aspx. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO® Kit Platinum: FICO Score Check, as printed Jun. 7, 2005 in 1 page, http://www.myfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Sample03.html. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO®. Kit Platinum: Look for Errors, as printed Jun. 7, 2005 in 3 pages http://www.myfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Sample02.html. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO® Kit Platinum: Your FICO Score, as printed Jun. 7, 2005 in 1 page, http://www.mvfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Sample01.html. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 5 pages, http://www.rnyfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulator.asp. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Max Out All Your Credit Cards, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?Simulation=4&ReportID=1& productID=&Execute.x=105&Execute.y=23. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Miss Payments on All Accounts With a Payment Due, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?miss_payment=radiobutton &Simulation=2&ReportID=1&ProductID=&Execute.x81&Execute.y=28>. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Pay Down Delinquent Balances First, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?textfieldCC=750&Simulation=7&ReportID=1&ProductID=&PayDelinquent.x=78&PayDelinquent.y=30. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Pay Down the Balances on All Your Credit Cards, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?textfieldCC1=750&SelectMonths=1&PayOption=radiobutton&textfieldCC=750&Simulation=3&ReportID=1&ProductID=&Execute.x=57&Execute.y=22. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Pay Your Bills on Time, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?select1=1&Simulation=1 &ReportID=1&ProductID=&PayBillsOnTime.x=93&PayBillsOnTime.y=23. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Seek New Credit, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp7new _credit=radiobutton&textfield5A=3000&tectfield5B=&textfield5C=&Simulation=5&ReportID=1&ProductID=&NewCredit.x=62&NewCredit.y=20. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Suggested Best Action, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?Simulation=111&ReportID=1&ProductID=&TopAction.x=66&TopAction.y=16. |
| Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Transfer Credit Card Balances, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?textfield222=5000&Simulation=6&ReportID=1&ProductID=&TransferBalance.x=86&TransferBalance.y=24. |
| FamilySecure.com; “Identity Theft Protection for the Whole Family | FamilySecure.com” http://www.familysecure.com/, as retrieved on Nov. 5, 2009. |
| Fan et al., “Design of Customer Credit Evaluation System for E-Business”, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004, pp. 392-397. |
| Felsenthal, Edward, “Health Costs; Managed Care Helps Curb Costs, Study Says,” The Wall Street Journal, dated Aug. 12, 1991. |
| Fenner, Peter, “Mobile Address Management and Billing for Personal Communications”, 1st International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, 1992, ICUPC '92 Proceedings, pp. 253-257. |
| Fickenscher, Lisa, “Merchant American Express Seeks to Mine its Data on Cardholder Spending Patterns,” American Banker, vol. 162, Issue 56, Mar. 24, 1997, pp. 1-2. |
| “Fictitious Business Name Records”, Westlaw Database Directory, http://directory.westlaw.com/scope/default.asp?db=FBN-ALL&RS-W...&VR=2.0 as printed Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 5. |
| “Fighting the New Face of Fraud”, FinanceTech, http://www.financetech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=167100405, Aug. 2, 2005. |
| “Financing Medical Procedures A Lucrative But Risky Business,” Credit Risk Management Report, vol. 10, Issue 15, 2 pgs., dated Aug. 7, 2000. |
| Financial Engines, http://corp.financialengines.com/ printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 1 page. |
| Fisher, Joseph, “Access to Fair Credit Reports: Current Practices and Proposed Legislation,” American Business Law Journal, Fall 1981, vol. 19, No. 3, p. 319. |
| Forrest, David, “Achieving Perfect Credit—Lesson 3: Assessing Your Situation,” https://web.archive.org/web/20140828173720/http://www.fool.com/seminars/ev/index.htm?sid=0029&lid=300, as archived Aug. 28, 2014, copyright 1995-2002, in 7 pages. |
| Frank, John, “Scoring Takes on a New Meaning,” Credit Card Management, Sep. 1996, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 155-159. |
| “Fraud Alert | Learn How”. Fight Identity Theft, http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/flag.html, accessed on Nov. 5, 2009. |
| “FTC Testifies: Identity Theft on the Rise”, FTC News Release, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 3. |
| “Fund Manager,” Portfolio Management Software website, indexed into Google on Jan. 7, 2005, Retrieved Oct. 24, 2014 http://www.fundmanagersoftware.com/, http://www.fundmanagersoftware.com/help/gph_tp_pieasset.html, http://www.fundmanagersoftware.com/demo2.html. |
| GAO-03-661, Best Practices: Improved Knowledge of DOD Service Contracts Could Reveal Significant Savings, GAO, Jun. 2003. |
| Garcia-Molina et al., “Database Systems: The Complete Book”, Prentice Hall, Inc., Ch. 15, Oct. 1, 2001, pp. 713-715. |
| “Geographic Aggregation Tool SAS Beta Version 4.1”, Environmental Health Surveillance Section, New York State Dept. in Health, Troy, NY, Mar. 24, 2015, pp. 10. |
| Gibbs, Adrienne; “Protecting Your Children from Identity Theft,” Nov. 25, 2008, http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/identity-ID-theft-and-kids-children-1282.php, pp. 4. |
| Gilje, Shelby, “Credit Agency Moving Into Health Care,” NewsRoom, The Seattle Times, Section: SCENE, Mar. 22, 1995, pp. 3, http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?rs=WLW8.03&ss+CNT&rp=%2fWelc . . . . |
| Gilje, Shelby, “Keeping Tabs On Businesses That Keep Tabs On Us”, NewsRoom, The Seattle Times, Section: SCENE, Apr. 19, 1995, pp. 4. |
| Gionis et al., “Similarity Search in High Dimensions via Hashing”, Sep. 7, 1999, pp. 518-529. |
| Giudici, Paolo, “Bayesian Data Mining, with Application to Benchmarking and Credit Scoring,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 2001, vol. 17, pp. 69-81. |
| “GLBA Compliance and FFIEC Compliance” http://www.trustwave.com/financial-services.php printed Apr. 8, 2013 in 1 page. |
| Glenn, Brandon, “Multi-provider patient portals get big boost with ONC ruling”, Feb. 25, 2013, http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/medical-economics/news/user-defined-tags/meaningful-use/multi-provider-patient-portals-get-big-boost in 2 pages. |
| Goldstein, Jacob, “The Newest Vital Sign: Your Credit Score,” The Wall Street Journal, Health Blog, as viewed at http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/03/18/the-newest-vital-sign-your-cr, Mar. 18, 2008, pp. 3. |
| Gopalan, R., “Panning for Sales-Force Gold”, Intelligent Enterprise, Dec. 21, 1999, vol. 2, No. 18, pp. 39-43. |
| “Green Tree Investors May Go To Court,” Mar. 4, 1998, http://web.archive.org/web/20001101080021 /http://www.channel4000.com/news/stories/news-980304-120038.html. |
| “Groups Demand Government Action on Online Marketing to Children,” American Marketplace, Apr. 4, 1996, vol. 17, No. 7, p. 53. |
| Gualtieri et al., “The Forrester Wave™: Big Data Streaming Analytics, Q1 2016”, Forrester®, Mar. 30, 2016, pp. 14, https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/en_us/doc/analystreport/forrester-big-data-streaming-analytics-108218.pdf. |
| Haffar, Imad, “‘SPAM’: A Computer Model for Management of Spare-Parts Inventories in Agricultural Machinery Dealerships”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 12, Issue 4, Jun. 1995, pp. 323-332. |
| Hampton et al., “Mapping Health Data: Improved Privacy Protection With Donut Method Geomasking”, American Journal of Epidemiology, Sep. 3, 2010, vol. 172, No. 9, pp. 8. |
| Handfield et al., “Managing Component Life Cycles in Dynamic Technological Environments”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Tempe, Spring 1994, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 20-28. |
| Healow.com, Various screenshots from page titled “Health and Online Wellness,” https://healow.com/apps/jsp/webview/index.jsp printed Aug. 19, 2013 in 4 pages. |
| Healthspek.com, “How Good Are We?” http://healthspek.com/how-good-are-we/ printed Jan. 21, 2014 in 2 pages. |
| “Healthspek Users Can Now Import Their Doctors' Records into Their Personal Health Record,” PRWeb, Nashville, TN, Jan. 14, 2014, pp. 1 http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/01/prweb11485346.htm. |
| Healy, Thomas J., “The New Science of Borrower Behavior,” Mortgage Banking, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 26-35, Feb. 1, 1998. |
| Henry, M.D., Kimberly A., “The Face-Lift Sourcebook,” Oct. 11, 2000, 3 pgs. (p. 207). |
| Herron, Janna, “Social Media-Based Credit Score?”, http://www.bankrate.com/financing/credit-cards/social-media-based-credit-score/, posted Friday, Jan. 13, 2012, printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| Hill, Kerry, “Identity Theft Your Social Security Number Provides Avenue For Thieves”, NewsRoom, Wisconsin State Journal, Sep. 13, 1998, pp. 4. |
| ID Analytics, “ID Analytics® Consumer Notification Service” printed Apr. 16, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| ID Theft Assist, “Do You Know Where Your Child's Credit Is?”, Nov. 26, 2007, http://www.idtheftassist.com/pages/story14, pp. 3. |
| Ideon, Credit-Card Registry that Bellyflopped this Year, Is Drawing some Bottom-Fishers, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 21, 1995, pp. C2. |
| IgiHealth.com, “Orbit® PHR: Personal Health Record (PHR),” http://www.igihealth.com/consumers/orbit_phr.html, printed Jan. 21, 2014 in 2 pages. |
| “Impac Funding Introduces Enhanced Website for Static Pool Tracking of MBS Transactions,” Waltham, MA; Webpage printed out from http://www.lewtan.com/press/1208044_Impac-Lewtan.htm on Mar. 20, 2008. |
| “Improving the Implementation of State Children's Health Insurance Programs for Adolescents Report of an Invitational Conference Sponsored by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Adolescent Health,” Pediatrics, Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Adolescent Health, Sep. 26-27, 1999, 9 pages. |
| Inderfurth et al., “Decision Support for Spare Parts Acquisition in Post Product Life Cycle”, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2008, vol. 16, pp. 17-42. |
| IndiCareTM, On-Line Patient Assistant Program, Website Users Manual, JBI Associates, LLC, Jan. 1997, pp. 17. |
| Insightsone.com, “Healthcare,” http://insightsone.com/healthcare-predictive-analytics/ printed Mar. 6, 2014 in 5 pages. |
| Instant Access to Credit Reports Now Available Online with DMS' CreditBrowser-based system also Simplifies Credit Decisioning and Offers a Central Point of Control, Business Wire, Dallas, May 23, 2000, p. 0264. |
| “Intelligent Miner Applications Guide”, IBM Corp., Apr. 2, 1999, Chapters 4-7, pp. 33-132. |
| Internal Revenue Service Data Book 2000, Issued Aug. 2001, Revised May 2003. |
| “Japan's JAAI System Appraises Used Cars Over Internet”, Asia Pulse, Mar. 3, 2000, p. 1. |
| Jaro, Matthew A., “Probabilistic Linkage of Large Public Health Data Files”, Statistics in Medicine, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 491-498. |
| Jones, Yvonne, “Consumers Understood the Basics but Could Benefit from Targeted Educational Efforts,” GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office, Mar. 16, 2005, pp. 128, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-223. |
| “JPMorgan Worldwide Securities Services to Acquire Paloma's Middle and Back Office Operations,” Webpage printed from http://www.jpmorgan.com on Apr. 1, 2009. |
| “Judging Credit: Consumers Need Better Finance Tools”, News Journal, Daytona Beach, FL, Dec. 28, 2002. |
| Käki, Anssi, “Forecasting in End-Of-Life Spare Parts Procurement”, Master's Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, System Analysis Laboratory, Jul. 27, 2007, pp. 84. |
| Kauffman et al., “Research Directions on the Role an Impact of ICT in Microfinance”, Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2010, pp. 10. |
| Kent, Heather, “Huge declines in price as competition heats up in Vancouver's booming laser-surgery market,” CMAJ, Octobers, 1999; 161 (7), pp. 857-858. |
| Khare et al., “Nutch: A Flexible and Scalable Open-Source Web Search Engine”, CommerceNet Labs Technical Reprt 04-04, Nov. 2004, pp. 15. |
| Kim et al., “Optimal Pricing, EOL (End of Life) Warranty, and Spare Parts Manufacturing Strategy Amid Product Transition”, European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, vol. 188, pp. 723-745. |
| Klein, et al., “A Constant-Utility Index of the Cost of Living”, The Review of Economic Studies, Sep. 1, 1947, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 84-87. |
| Klein, et al., “An Econometric Model of the United States: 1929-1952”, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Jun. 1, 1955, pp. 4-41. |
| Klein, Lawrence R., “The Keynesian Revolution”, New York, The MacMillan Company, Jan. 1, 1947, pp. 56-189. |
| Krupp, James A.G., “Forecasting for the Automotive Aftermarket”, The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods & Systems, Winter 1993-1994, vol. 12, No. 4, ABI/Inform Global, pp. 8-12. |
| Kulkosky, Edward, “Credit Scoring Appeal Transcends Underwriting,” American Banker, vol. 161, No. 93, p. 8, May 15, 1996. |
| Kuykendall, Lavonne, “Divergent Paths in Early Pacts with Credit Bureaus”, American Banker, May 30, 2002, vol. 167, No. 3, pp. 2. |
| Kwan et al., “Protection of Geoprivacy and Accuracy of Spatial Information: How Effective Are Geographical Masks?” Carographica, Summer 2004, vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 15-27. |
| Lan, Joe, “The Top Portfolio Management Software,” http://www.aaii.com/computerizedinvesting/article/the-top-portfolio-management-software, Includes Discussion thread, Fourth Quarter 2011, pp. 17. |
| Lanubile, et al., “Evaluating Empirical Models for the Detection of High-Risk Components: Some Lessons Learned”, 20th Annual Software Engineering Workshop, Nov. 29-30, 1995, Greenbelt, Maryland, pp. 1-6. |
| Lapide, Larry, “New Developments in Business Forecasting”, The Journal of Business Forecasting, Spring 2002, pp. 12-14. |
| Lavelle, Marianne, “Health Plan Debate Turning To Privacy Some Call for Safeguards On Medical Disclosure. Is a Federal Law Necessary?,” The National Law Journal, vol. 16, No. 39, dated May 30, 1994, as downloaded from http://web2.westlaw.com/result/. |
| Lee, W.A., “Experian Eyes Payments, Mulls Deals” American Banker: The Financial Services Daily, 2pgs., New York, NY, May 30, 2003. |
| Lee, W.A.; “Fair Isaac Taps Institutions for Credit Score Distribution”, American Banker: The Financial Services Daily, New York, NY, Apr. 9, 2002, vol. 167, Issue 67, 1 Page. |
| Lee, W.A., “Money, Quicken, and the Value of Alliances”, American Banker: The Financial Services Daily, 2pgs., New York, NY, Jul. 28, 2003. |
| Lendingtree.com, “Lender Ratings & Reviews,” http://web.archive.org/web/20091015043716/http://www.lendingtree.com/lender-reviews/, Oct. 15, 2009, in 21 pages. |
| Letter to Donald A. Robert from Carolyn B. Maloney, dated Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 2. |
| Letter to Donald A. Robert from Senator Charles E. Schumer, dated Oct. 11, 2007, pp. 2. |
| Letter to Harry C. Gambill from Carolyn B. Maloney, dated Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 2. |
| Letter to Harry C. Gambill from Senator Charles E. Schumer, dated Oct. 11, 2007, pp. 2. |
| Letter to Richard F. Smith from Carolyn B. Maloney, dated Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 2. |
| Letter to Richard F. Smith from Senator Charles E. Schumer, dated Oct. 11, 2007, pp. 2. |
| Li et al., “Automatic Verbal Information Verification for User Authentication”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 5, Sep. 2000, pp. 585-596. |
| Lifelock, “Identity Theft F.A.Q.” http://web.archive.org/web/20080215093614/http://www.identitytheftkiller.com/promo/faq.php, Feb. 15, 2008, pp. 8. |
| LifeLock; “How Can LifeLock Protect My Kids and Family?” http://www.lifelock.com/lifelock-for-people/how-we-do-it/how-can-lifelock-protect-my-kids-and-family printed Mar. 14, 2008 in 1 page. |
| Lifelock, “Personal Identity Theft Protection & Identity Theft Products,” http://www.lifelock.com/lifelock-for-people, accessed Nov. 5, 2007. |
| Lifelock, Various Pages, www.lifelock.com/, Jan. 9, 2007, pp. 49. |
| Littwin, Angela, “Beyond Usury: A Study of Credit-Card Use and Preference Among Low-Income Consumers”, Texas Law Review, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 451-506; Feb. 2008. |
| Lobo, Jude, “MySAP.com Enterprise Portal Cookbook,” SAP Technical Delivery, Feb. 2002, vol. 1, pp. 1-13. |
| Longo, Tracey, “Managing Money: Your Family Finances”, Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine, Jun. 1, 1995, vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 4. |
| Lorette, Kristie, “Howto Successfully Dispute Inaccuracies on Your Credit Report,” http://web.archive.org/web/20110531184149/http://www.quizzle.com/blog/2011/03/how-to-successfully-dispute-inaccuracies-on-your-credit-report/, Mar. 25, 2011, in * pages. |
| Loshin, Intelligent Enterprise: Better Insight for Business Decisions, “Value-Added Data: Merge Ahead”, Feb. 9, 2000, vol. 3, No. 3, 5 pages. |
| Lovelace, Robin, “IPFinR: An Implementation of Spatial Microsimulation in R”, RL's Powerstar, Jun. 12, 2013, pp. 9, https://robinlovelace.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/ipfinr-an-implementation-of-spatial-microsimulation-in-r/. |
| Lund, Graham, “Credit Bureau Data: Maximizing the Benefits,” Credit Management, May 2004, ProQuest Central, pp. 44-45. |
| Maciejewski et al., “Understanding Syndromic Hotspots—A Visual Analytics Approach”, Conference Paper, IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Oct. 21-23, 2017, pp. 35-42. |
| Magid, Lawrence, J., Business Tools: When Selecting an ASP Ensure Data Mobility, Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, CA, Feb. 26, 2001, vol. C, Issue 4, pp. 3. |
| Manilla, http://www.manilla.com/how-it-works/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 1 page. |
| Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., “1998 Health Care Survey of DoD Beneficiaries: Technical Manual,” Jul. 1999. |
| McGovern, Celeste, Jayhawk Medical Acceptance. (Brief Article), Alberta Report, 1 pg., dated Aug. 23, 1999. |
| McLaughlin, Nancy H., “Homeless, pregnant and alone Dana Sides knows her baby is likely to come in a month, but she has No. idea where she will go after leaving the hospital,” NewsRoom, Greensboro News & Record (NC), Section: General News, dated Dec. 6, 2001. |
| McNamara, Paul, “Start-up's pitch: The Envelope, please,” Network World, Apr. 28, 1997, vol. 14, No. 17, p. 33. |
| “MediCredit Announces Major Investment from Medstone; Financing Will Enable Dramatic Expansion of Online Services,” Business Wire, pp. 2, dated May 12, 2000. |
| MediCredit, Patient Financing, “Thought you couldn't afford Cosmetic Surgery?,” 3 pgs., as downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/19970601060333/http://www.medicredit.com/ (1 of 2) [Oct. 15, 2008 3:16:31 PM]. |
| Medick et al., “German Agency to Mine Facebook to Assess Creditworthiness”, Jun. 7, 2012, http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-credit-agency-plans-to-analyze-individual-facebook-pages-a-837539.html printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| Menge, Falko, “Enterprise Service Bus”, Free and Open Source Software Conference, 2007, pp. 6. |
| MERit Credit Engine™, Diagram, https://web.archive.org/web/20020204202530/http://creditengine.net/diagram.htm, copyright 1997, archived Feb. 4, 2002, pp. 1. |
| Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Edition, Jan. 1, 1993, p. 79. |
| MicroBilt, “PRBC Credit Reporting Agency—Payment Reporting Builds Credit,” retrieved from http://www.microbilt.com/nontraditional-credit-report.aspx and corresponding “Sample Report,” retrieved from http://www.microbilt.com/pdfs/PRBC%20Sample%20Report%20(complete).pdf printed Nov. 21, 2013 in 8 pages. |
| Microfinance Africa, “Philippines: Microfinance Players to get Their Own Credit Info Bureau,” Apr. 5, 2011, http://microfinanceafrica.net/microfinance-around-the-world/philippines-microfinance-players-to-get-their-own-credit-info-bureau/ printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| Microsoft, “Expand the Reach of Your Business,” Microsoft Business Solutions, 2004, in 16 pages. |
| Miller, Margaret, “Credit Reporting Systems Around the Globe: The State of the Art in Public and Private Credit Registries”, Jun. 2000, pp. 32, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRES/Resources/469232-1107449512766/Credit_Reporting_Systems_Around_The_Globe.pdf. |
| Miller, Joe, “NADA Used-Car Prices Go Online”, Automotive News, Jun. 14, 1999, p. 36. |
| Mint.com, http://www.mint.com/ printed Sep. 18, 2008 in 2 pages. |
| Mint.com, http://www.mint.com/how-it-works/ printed Feb. 5, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| Montgomery County Housing Report, Residential Market Report, Jan. 2004 in 6 pages. |
| Moore, John R., Jr. “Forecasting and Scheduling for Past-Model Replacement Parts”, Management Science, Application Series, vol. 18, No. 4, Part 1, Dec. 1971, pp. B-200-B-213. |
| “Mosaic” (geodemography), available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(geodemography), as last modified Jul. 13, 2012. pp. 4. |
| MS Money Software by Microsoft http://www.microsoft.com/Money/default.mspx as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| Mvelopes, http://www.mvelopes.com/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 2 pages. |
| MyFico, http://www.myfico.com/products/ficoone/sample/sample_scoresimulator.aspx printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 3 pages. |
| My ID Alerts, “Why ID Alerts” http://www.myidalerts.com/why-id-alerts.jsps printed Apr. 3, 2012 in 2 pages. |
| My ID Alerts, “How it Works” http://www.myidalerts.com/how-it-works.jsps printed Apr. 3, 2012 in 3 pages. |
| MyReceipts, http://www.myreceipts.com/, printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 1 page. |
| MyReceipts—How it Works, http://www.myreceipts.com/howItWorks.do, printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 1 page. |
| “Name Availability Records”, Westlaw Database Directory, http://directory.westlaw.com/scope/default.asp?db=NA-ALL&RS=W...&VR=2.0 as printed Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 5. |
| National Alert Registry Launches RegisteredOffendersList.org to Provide Information on Registered Sex Offenders, May 16, 2005, pp. 2, http://www.prweb.com/printer/240437.htm accessed on Oct. 18, 2011. |
| National Alert Registry Offers Free Child Safety “Safe From Harm” DVD and Child Identification Kit, Oct. 24, 2006. pp. 2, http://www.prleap.com/pr/53170 accessed on Oct. 18, 2011. |
| National Alert Registry website titled, “Does a sexual offender live in your neighborhood”, Oct. 22, 2006, pp. 2, http://web.archive.org/wb/20061022204835/http://www.nationallertregistry.com/accessed on Oct. 13, 2011. |
| Nelson et al., “Efficient, Automatic Web Resource Harvesting”, Conference: Eighth ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management (WIDM 2006), Arlington, Virginia, USA, Nov. 10, 2006, pp. 8. |
| “New FICO score extends lenders' reach to credit-underserved millions”, Viewpoints: News, Ideas and Solutions from Fair Isaac, Sep./Oct. 2004 as downloaded from http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/exeres/F178D009-B47A-444F-BD11-8B4D7D8B3532,frame . . . in 6 pages. |
| “New Privista Product Provides Early Warning System to Combat Identity Theft”, PR Newswire, Oct. 24, 2000, PR Newswire Association, Inc., New York. |
| “NewsHound: NewsHound User Guide Internet E-Mail”, of record as early as May 2, 1997, pp. 11. |
| Newsroom, “CIGNA Report Withdrawn As Foe Sees Opening,” Insurance Regulator, State Survey, Sep. 9, 1996, vol. 8, Issue 34, pp. 4. |
| “New for Investors: Asset Allocation, Seasoned Returns and More,” Prosper, http://blog.prosper.com/2011/10/27/new-for-investors-asset-allocation-seasoned-returns-and-more/, Oct. 27, 2011, pp. 4. |
| Next Card: About Us, http://web.cba.neu.edu/˜awatson/NextCardCase/NextCardAboutUs.htm printed Oct. 23, 2009 in 10 pages. |
| “Normalize,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/normalize printed Jun. 14, 2010. |
| Novack, Janet, “The Coming Fight over FICO,” Forbes, Dec. 18, 1995, vol. 156, No. 14, p. 96. |
| Occasional CF Newsletter; http://www.halhelms.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=newsletters.oct.1999; Oct. 1999. |
| Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, DOE/EIA-M065(2004), Model Documentation Report: Macroeconomic Activity Module (MAM) of the National Energy Modeling System, EIA, Washington DC, Feb. 2004. |
| Organizing Maniac's Blog—Online Receipts Provided by MyQuickReceipts.com, http://organizingmaniacs.wordpress.com/2011/01/12/online-receipts-provided-by-myquickreceipts.com/dated Jan. 12, 2011 printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 3 pages. |
| Packer, A. H., “Simulation and Adaptive Forecasting an Applied to Inventory Control”, Operations Research, Jul. 1965, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 660-679. |
| Pagano, et al., “Information Sharing in Credit Markets,” Dec. 1993, The Journal of Finance, vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 1693-1718. |
| “Parse”, Definition from PC Magazine Encyclopedia, http://www/pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term_0,2542,t=parse&i=48862,00.asp as downloaded Mar. 5, 2012. |
| Partnoy, Frank, Rethinking Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies: An Institutional Investor Perspective, Council of Institutional Investors, Apr. 2009, pp. 21. |
| Paustian, Chuck, “Every Cardholder a King Customers get the Full Treatment at Issuers' Web Sites,” Card Marketing, New York, Mar. 2001, vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 4. |
| Pennsylvania Law Weekly, “Discriminating Against Victims Admitting Domestic Abuse Can Lead to Denial of Insurance Coverage,” vol. XVIII, No. 26, dated Jun. 26, 1996, 2 pgs., as downloaded from http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?rs=WLW8. |
| PersonalCapital.com, http://www.personalcapital.com/how-it-works printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 5 pages. |
| Peters, Peter-Paul, “A Spare Parts Configurator for the European Service Business” (Graduation Report), Honeywell, Industrial Service Logistic Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar. 2000, pp. 80. |
| Phinisee, Tamarind, “Banks, FTC Step Up Efforts to Address Identity Theft”, San Antonio Business Journal; San Antonio, Jul. 5, 2002, vol. 16, No. 24, pp. 5. |
| Planet Receipt—Home, http://www.planetreceipt.com/home printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 1 page. |
| Planet Receipt—Solutions & Features, http://www.planetreceipt.com/solutions-features printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 2 pages. |
| Ponniah, Paulraj, “Data Warehousing Fundamentals: A Comprehensive Guide for IT Professionals”, Wiley-Interscience Publication, pp. 257-289, 377-397, Aug. 3, 2001. |
| Porter, G. Zell, “An Economic Method for Evaluating Electronic Component Obsolescence Solutions”, www.gidep.org/data/dmsms/library/zell.pdf, May 1998, pp. 1-9. |
| “PostX to Present at Internet Showcase”, PR Newswire, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 2. |
| PostX, “PostX® Envelope and ActiveView”, http://web.archive.org/web/19970714203719/http://www.postx.com/priducts_fm.html, Jul. 14, 1997 (retrieved Nov. 7, 2013) in 2 pages. |
| Powerforms: Declarative Client-Side For Field Validation, ISSN 1386-145x, Dec. 2000. |
| “PremierGuide Announces Release 3.0 of Local Search Platform”, Business Wire, Mar. 4, 2004, Palo Alto, CA, p. 5574. |
| “ProClarity and Microsoft to Host Free Seminar Series on Retail Analytics with Independent Analyst Firm-ProClarity to Share Best Forrester Analysts to Discuss Trends and the Future of the Retail”; Business Wire; pp. 2; Aug. 13, 2003. |
| “Qualifying For Debt Settlement”, http://www.certifieddebt.com/debt/settlement-qualifications.shtml printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 2 pages. |
| Quantix Software, “Investment Account Manager,” available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UwNTEER1Kk, as published Mar. 21, 2012. |
| Quicken Online by Intuit http://www.quicken.intuit.com/, as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| “Quicken Support”, http://web.archive.org/web/20071231040130/http://web.intuit.com/support/quicken/docs/d_qif.html as archived Dec. 31, 2007 in 6 pages. |
| Rahm, et al. “Data Cleaning: Problems and Current Approaches”, Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, Dec. 2000, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 11. |
| Raman, et al., “Potter's Wheel: An Interactive Data Cleaning System”, Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference, Roma, Italy, 2001, pp. 10. |
| Ramaswamy, Vinita M., Identity-Theft Toolkit, The CPA Journal, Oct. 1, 2006, vol. 76, Issue 10, pp. 66-70. |
| RAP Interactive, Inc. and Web Decisions: Proudly Presents Live Decisions, A Powerful New Information and Technology Resource that Revolutionizes Interactive Marketing, downloaded from www.webdecisions.com/pdf/LiveDecisions_Bro.pdf, as printed on Aug. 13, 2007. |
| Ratner, Juliana, “GMAC to Sell Risk-Management Advice; Target is 150 Biggest Home Loan Servicers,” American Banker, vol. 161, No. 53, p. 16, Mar. 19, 1996. |
| “Recognition and use by Appraisers of Energy-Performance Benchmarking Tools for Commercial Buildings,” prepared by the Institute for Market Transformation, NYSERDA, Feb. 2003, pp. 6. |
| Repici et al., “The Comma Separated Value (CSV) File Format”, http://creativyst.com/Doc/Articles/CSV/CSV01.htm, Creativyst, Inc., 2002, pp. 10. |
| “Resolve Debt for Less: With Help from Freedom Financial” http://www.debtsettlementusa.com/ printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages. |
| “RF/Spectrum to Offer Score,” National Mortgage News, Special Report; Credit Reporting & Scaring, Jun. 9, 1997, p. 40. |
| Risk Monitors, “New GMAC Unit Focuses on Portfolio Risk,” PR Newswire, Mar. 13, 1996, pp. 2. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/NEW+GMAC+UNIT+FOCUSES+ON+PORTFOLIO+RISK-a018092212. |
| Roos, Gina, “Web-Based Service Helps OEMs Cure Parts Obsolescence Blues”, Electronic Engineering Times, Oct. 8, 2001, p. 86. |
| Roth, Andrew, “CheckFree to Introduce E-Mail Billing Serving,” American Banker, New York, Mar. 13, 2001, vol. 166, No. 49, pp. 3. |
| Rubin, Rita, “Cosmetic Surgery On Credit, Finance plans let patients reconstruct now, pay later,” The Dallas Morning News, 2 pgs., dated Sep. 10, 1988. |
| Santarini, Michael, “Forecasts the Probable Obsolescence of Components—Module Predicts Parts Life”, Electronic Engineering Times, Jan. 11, 1999, vol. 1, p. 48. |
| SAS, “SAS® Information Delivery Portal”, Fact Sheet, 2008, in 4 pages. |
| Saunders, A., “Data Goldmine,” Management Today, London: Mar. 1, 2004, 6 pages. |
| Sawyers, Arlena, “NADA to Offer Residual Guide”, Automotive News, May 22, 2000, p. 1. |
| Sax, Michael M., Data Collection and Privacy Protection: An International Perspective, Presentation: Managing Online Risk and Liability Conference, Aug. 31, 1999, pp. 58. |
| Schneier, B. “Applied Cryptography”, John Wiley & Sons, Second Edition, pp. 435-447, 1996. |
| Schmidt, David, “Environmental Impact: The Changing Credit Reporting Landscape,” Business Credit, Apr. 2003, vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 14 (electronic copy provided in 5 pages). |
| “ScoreNet® Network”, FairIsaac, web.archive.org/web/20071009014242/http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/rdonlyres/AC4C2F79-4160-4E44-B0CB-5C899004879A/0/ScoreNetnetworkBR.pdf, May 2006, pp. 6. |
| Screenshot for Investment Account Manager v.2.8.3, published at http://www.aaii.com/objects/get/1642.gif by at least Aug. 30, 2011 in 1 page. |
| Sealey, Geraldine, “Child ID Theft Can Go Unnoticed for Years”, http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=90257, Sep. 12, 2003 in 9 pages. |
| SearchAmerica, “Payment Advisor Suite TM”, Solutions, 2009, pp. 2. |
| Selz, Michael, “Lenders Find Niche In Cosmetic Surgery That Isn't Insured—But Since You Can't Repossess A Nose Job, Risks Aren't Restricted to the Patients,” Wall Street Journal, New York, N.Y., Jan. 1997, p. A.1, 3 pgs. |
| “Settling Your Debts—Part 1 in Our Debt Settlement Series”, http://www.creditinfocenter.com/debt/settle_debts.shtml printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages. |
| “Shareholders Sue Green Tree Financial,” Dated Dec. 4, 1997, http://web.archive.org/web/20000419070107/http://www.wcco.com/news/stories/news-971204-092238.html. |
| ShoeBoxed, https://www.shoeboxed.com/sbx-home/ printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 4 pages. |
| Simpson, Glyn, “Microsoft (MS) Money MSMoney FAQ, Help and Information Pages”, pp. 2, Copyright ©Glyn Simpson 1998-2007, http://web.archive.org/web/20071018075531/http://money.mvps.org/faq/article/196.aspx. |
| Singletary, Michelle “Ratings for the Credit Raters”, The Washington Post, The Color of Money column Mar. 24, 2002 in 1 page. |
| Singletary, Michelle, “Score One for Open Credit Ratings”, The Washington Post, Washington DC, Jun. 18, 2000, 3 pages. |
| Smith, Richard M., “The Web Bug FAQ”, Nov. 11, 1999, Version 1.0, pp. 4. |
| Smith, Wendell R., “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies”, The Journal of Marketing, The American Marketing Association, Brattleboro, Vermont, Jul. 1956, vol. XXI, pp. 3-8. |
| So et al., “Modelling and Model Validation of the Impact of the Economy on the Credit Risk of Credit Card Portfolios”, The Journal of Risk Model Validation (93-126), vol. 4, No. 4, Winter (Year: 2010). |
| “STAGG Variables Sum Up Credit Attributes for Automated Decisions”, PRWeb, May 11, 2011, pp. 2. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/5/prweb8404324.htm. |
| Stallings, W. “Cryptography and Network Security Principles and Practice”, Prentice Hall, Second Edition, pp. 295, 297, Jul. 15, 1998. |
| Stanton, T.H., “Credit Scoring and Loan Scoring as Tools for Improved Management of Federal Credit Programs”, Financier, Philadelphia, Summer 1999, vol. 6, 36 pages. |
| “StarNet Financial, Inc. Acquires Proprietary Rights to Sub-Prime Underwriting System Through Strategic Alliance With TRAkkER Corporation”, PR Newswire, Dallas, TX, Sep. 13, 1999. |
| State of Wisconsin, Division of Health Care Financing, Department of Health and Family Services: 1999-2001 Biennial Report, pp. 17-21. |
| Steele, Georgia, “Fair, Isaac Seeks Mortgage Tech Opportunities,” National Mortgage News, Special Report; B& C Lending, Mar. 23, 1998, p. 34. |
| Stein, Benchmarking Default Prediction Models: Pitfalls and Remedies in Model Validation, Moody's KMV, Revised Jun. 13, 2002, Technical Report #020305; New York. |
| Stone, “Linear Expenditure Systems and Demand Analysis: An Application to the Pattern of British Demand”, The Economic Journal: The Journal of The Royal Economic Society, Sep. 1954, pp. 511-527, vol. LXIV, Macmillan & Co., London. |
| Sullivan, Deidre, “Scoring Borrower Risk,” Mortgage Banking, Nov. 1994, vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 94-98. |
| Sullivan, Laurie, “Obsolete-Parts Program Thriving”, EBN, Manhasset, NY, Jan. 21, 2002, Issue 1296, p. 26. |
| Sumner, Anthony, “Tackling The Issue of Bust-Out Fraud”, Experian: Decision Analytics, Dec. 18, 2007, pp. 24. |
| Sumner, Anthony, “Tackling The Issue of Bust-Out Fraud”, e-News, Experian: Decision Analytics, pp. 4, [Originally Published in Retail Banker International Magazine Jul. 24, 2007]. |
| Tan et al., “Modeling of Web Robot Navigational Patterns”, 2000, Department of Computer Science; University of Minnesota, pp. 7. |
| Tao, Lixin, “Shifting Paradigms with the Application Service Provider Model”; Concordia University, IEEE, Oct. 2001, Canada. |
| Taylor, Marshall, “Loan-Level Pricing Draws Interest From Investors,” Real Estate Finance Today, Jul. 7, 1997, vol. 14, No. 14. p. 10. |
| Tennant, Don, “How a Health Insurance Provider Uses Big Data to Predict Patient Needs,” http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/from-under-the-rug/how-a-health-insurance-provider-uses-big-data-to-predict-patient-needs.html, printed Mar. 6, 2014 in 2 pages. |
| Texas Department of Human Services, 1999 Annual Report, 60 Years of Progress, Medial Services 9P137, Publication No. DHS-600-FY99. |
| Thatlook.com, Cosmetic Surgery Financing, 3 pgs, as downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/200001214113900/www.thatlook.com/cosmetic_surgery_financing.cfm (1 of 2) [Oct. 15, 2008 4:11:47 PM]. |
| “The Best of the Best,” Mortgage Technology, Nov. 1, 2003, vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 34-53. |
| TheMorningCall.com, “Cheap Ways to Foil Identity Theft,” www.mcall.com/business/columnists/all-karp.5920748jul01,0 . . . , published Jul. 1, 2007. |
| Thomas, David, “Report on Networks and Electronic Communications Newcourt Credit Turns to Extranet Services / A PC Connects To 1,200 Users At Once”, The Globe and Mail (Canada), Section: Report on Business Special Report, Nov. 12, 1996, pp. 2. |
| Todorova, Aleksandra, “Protecting Your Child's Identity”, Smart Money, Published Aug. 2, 2007, pp. 1-5. |
| TRAkkER Corporation website, trakkercorp.com, TRAkkER Software Description, May 26, 2000, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20000526234204/http://trakkercorp.com/page4.html. |
| “TransUnion—Child Identity Theft Inquiry”, TransUnion, http://www.transunion.com/corporate/personal/fraudldentityTheft/fraudPrevention/childIDInquiry.page as printed Nov. 5, 2009 in 4 pages. |
| TransUnion Consumer Credit Report http://www.transunion.com/, as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| TransUnion: Vantagescore®—Consistency in Credit Scoring, http://www.transunion.com/personal-credit/credit-reports/vantage-score.page printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages. |
| Trulia, “Trulia Estimates,” http://www.trulia.com/trulia_estimates/, printed Feb. 18, 2014 in 2 pages. |
| Tuman, Diane, “What is a Zestimate?” Mar. 2013, pp. 5, http://www.zillow.com/wikipages/What-is-a-Zestimate/. |
| US Legal, Description, http://www.uslegalforms.com/us/US-00708-LTR.htm printed Sep. 4, 2007 in 2 pages. |
| Vamosi, Robert, “How to Handle ID Fraud's Youngest Victims,” Nov. 21, 2008, http://news.cnet.com/8301-10789_3-10105303-57.html. |
| Van Collie, Shimon, “The Road to Better Credit-Card Marketing,” Bank Technology News, Sep. 1995, pp. 4. |
| Various Posts from the http://www.2p.wrox.com Forums: http://web.archive.org/web/2005045221950/http://p2p.wrox.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6513 , dated Nov. 15, 2003-Oct. 7, 2004. |
| Verstraeten, Geert, Ph.D.; Issues in predictive modeling of individual customer behavior: Applications in targeted marketing and consumer credit scoring; Universiteit Gent (Belgium), Dec. 2005. |
| Wahl, Martin, “The Stampede to Subprime,” Mortgage Banking, Oct. 1, 1997, vol. 58, No. 1, p. 26(7). |
| “WashingtonPost.com and Cars.com Launch Comprehensive Automotive Web Site For the Washington Area”, PR Newswire, Oct. 22, 1998. pp. 2. |
| Washington State Office of Public Defense, “Criteria and Standards for Determining and Verifying Indigency,” dated Feb. 9, 2001. |
| Watts, Craig, “Consumers Now Can Know What Loan Rate Offers to Expect Based on Their FICO Credit Score at MyFICO.com,” San Rafael, CA, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 2, http://www.myfico.com/PressRoom/PressReleases/2002_03_06.aspx. |
| Watts, Craig, “Fair, Isaac and Equifax Give Consumers New Score Power Tools Offering Greater Insights for Managing Their Credit Health,” May 21, 2002, pp. 3, http://www.myfico.com/PressRoom/PressReleases/2002_05_21.aspx. |
| Web Page posted at: http://web.archive.org/web20040805124909/http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_codete/tech/pl_sql/htdocs/x/Case/start.htm, pp. 1 and 4 of the webpages posted on Jan. 7, 2003. |
| Web Pages printed Nov. 2, 2004 of Internet Draft entitled “Tunneling SSL Through a WWW Proxy”, Luotonen, Ari, Netscape Communications Corporation (Dec. 14, 1995); 4 pages. http://muffin.doit.org/docs/rfc/tunneling.sub.--ssl.html. |
| Webpage printed from http://www.magnum.net/pdfs/RapUpBrochure.pdf as printed Mar. 3, 2008. |
| “We Eliminate Bad Debt”, as printed from http://www.webcreditbureau.com/start/, dated Aug. 22, 2012, 1 Page. |
| Webpage printed out from http://www.jpmorgan.com/cm/ContentServer?c=TS Content&pagename=jpmorgan%2Fts%2FTS_Content%2FGeneral&cid=1139403950394 on Mar. 20, 2008, Feb. 13, 2006, New York, NY. |
| Webster, Lee R., “Failure Rates & Life-Cycle Costs”, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, Apr. 1998, vol. 23, No. 4, ABI/INFORM Global, p. 42. |
| “Web Site Fuels Elective Surgery Trend; The Complete Resource to Paying for Cosmetic Surgery, Laser Vision Correction and Cosmetic Dentistry,” Business Wire, Apr. 7, 1999, pp. 2. |
| Wesabe.com http://www.wesabe.com/, as retrieved on Sep. 17, 2008. |
| West, David, “Neural Network Credit Scoring Models”, Computers & Operations Research, vol. 27, 2000, pp. 1131-1152. |
| White, Ron, “How Computers Work”, Special 10th Anniversary, Seventh Edition, Que Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, Oct. 2003, pp. 23. |
| Williams, Mark, “Results of the 1998 NASFAA Salary Survey”, News from NASFAA, 1998. |
| Wilson, Andrea, “Escaping the Alcatraz of Collections and Charge-Offs”, http://www.transactionworld.net/articles/2003/october/riskMgmt1.asp, Oct. 2003. |
| Window on State Government, Susan Combs, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Chapter 8: Health and Human Services, “Improve the Medicaid Eligibility Determination Process,” 9 pgs., as downloaded Apr. 9, 2008 from http://www.window.state.tx.us/etexas2001/recommend/ch08. |
| Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, BadgerCare Medicaid Application Credit Report Authorization Form, dated Jun. 21, 2001, effective date, Jul. 1, 2001. |
| Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, BadgerCare Medicaid Notification of Eligibility, dated Jul. 25, 2000, effective date, Jul. 1, 2000. |
| Wood, Greg, “Top Streaming Technologies for Data Lakes and Real-Time Data”, http://blog.zaloni.com/top-streaming-technologies-for-data-lakes-and-real-time-data, Sep. 20, 2016 in 3 pages. |
| Working, Holbrook, “Statistical Laws of Family Expenditure”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, pp. 43-56, vol. 38, American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1943. |
| Yang, et al., “An Analysis of the Ex Ante Probabilities of Mortgage Prepayment and Default”, Real Estate Economics, Dec. 1998, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 651-676. |
| YODLEE | Money Center, https://yodleemoneycenter.com/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 2 pages. |
| You Need A Budget, http://www.youneedabudget.com/features printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 3 pages. |
| Yücesan et al., “Distributed Web-Based Simulation Experiments for Optimization”, Simulation Practice and Theory 9, Oct. 2001, pp. 73-90. |
| Zandbergen, Paul A., “Ensuring Confidentiality of Geocoded Health Data: Assessing Geographic Masking Strategies for Individual-Level Data”, Review Article, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Advances in Medicine, VI. 2014, pp. 14. |
| Zimmerman et al., “A Web-Based Platform for Experimental Investigation of Electric Power Auctions,” Decision Support Systems, Jan. 1999, vol. 24, pp. 193-205. |
| Zoot—Decision Engine, www.zootweb.com/decision_engine.html, as printed on Mar. 3, 2008. |
| Zoot—Instant Rules GUI, www.zootweb.com/instant_rules_GUI.html as printed Mar. 3, 2008. |
| Zoot—Pre-Built Standard Attributes, www.zootweb.com/credit_attributes.html as printed Mar. 3, 2008. |
| Zoot—Rules Management GUI, www.zootweb.com/business_rules_GUI.html as printed Mar. 3, 2008. |
| Declaration of Paul Clark, DSc. for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,504,628 (Symantec Corporation, Petitioner), dated Jan. 15, 2014 in 76 pages. |
| Exhibit D to Joint Claim Construction Statement, filed in Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-00511-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (combined for pretrial purposes with RPost Holdings. Inc., et al. v. Experian Marketing Solutions. Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00513-JRG (E.D. Tex.)) Filed Jan. 14, 2014 in 9 pages. |
| First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. And Rpost Communications Limited V. Constant Contact, Inc.; et al.) filed Feb. 11, 2013 in 14 pages. |
| First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. And Rpost Communications Limited V. Epsilon Data Management, LLC.) filed Sep. 13, 2013 in 9 pages. |
| First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-513-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. And Rpost Communications Limited V. Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc.) filed Aug. 30, 2013 in 9 pages. |
| Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review in U.S. Pat. No. 8,161,104 (Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc., Epsilon Data Management, LLC, and Constant Contact, Inc., v. Rpost Communications Limited) dated Jan. 29, 2014 in 90 pages. |
| Source Code Appendix attached to U.S. Appl. No. 08/845,722 by Venkatraman et al., Exhibit A, Part 1 & 2, pp. 32. |
| Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated May 30, 2003. |
| Preliminary Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Sep. 15, 2003. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jan. 25, 2008. |
| Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jul. 23, 2008. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Oct. 2, 2008. |
| Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jan. 14, 2009. |
| Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jul. 21, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Aug. 19, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2005/041814, dated Dec. 27, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US07/76152, dated Mar. 20, 2009. |
| Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2012281182, dated Jul. 8, 2014. |
| Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2012281182, dated May 19, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280041782.2, dated Mar. 4, 2016. |
| Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 12811546.6, dated Nov. 25, 2014. |
| Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 12811546.6, dated Sep. 18, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Indian Patent Application No. 490/DELNP/2014, dated Jun. 20, 2019. |
| Official Communication in Russian Patent Application No. 2014101674/08, dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/046316, dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/046316, dated Jan. 14, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/60393, dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/37565, dated May 12, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Jun. 23, 2010. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Feb. 4, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2013356451, dated Jun. 22, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380006862.9, dated Aug. 2, 2016. |
| Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 13860724.7, dated May 21, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Russian Patent Application No. 2014127000, dated Dec. 23, 2015. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/072102, dated Apr. 18, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/072102, dated Jun. 9, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2014203430, dated Aug. 15, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480000626.0, dated Aug. 1, 2016. |
| Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 14733951.9, dated Sep. 11, 2015. |
| Official Communication in Russian Patent Application No. 2014127320, dated Jul. 5, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/019142, dated Jun. 20, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/019142, dated Sep. 17, 2015. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/048265, dated Dec. 5, 2017. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2017/048265, dated Mar. 7, 2019. |
| Partial Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP12747205, dated May 14, 2020. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP12747205, dated Aug. 14, 2020. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/016258, dated May 16, 2018. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2018/016258, dated Aug. 15, 2019. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2020/012976, dated May 6, 2020. |
| Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 60/168,272, dated Dec. 1, 1999 in 14 pages. |
| Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 60/168,276, dated Dec. 1, 1999 in 82 pages. |
| Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 60/213,367, dated Jun. 23, 2000 in 20 pages. |
| Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/653,595, dated Aug. 31, 2000. |
| Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Feb. 22, 2001. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Jan. 20, 2006. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Jul. 11, 2006. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Dec. 1, 2006. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated May 10, 2007. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Mar. 21, 2008. |
| Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, filed Jun. 25, 2002. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Oct. 22, 2007. |
| Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Apr. 14, 2008. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Aug. 21, 2008. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Feb. 26, 2009. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Aug. 18, 2009. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Feb. 19, 2010. |
| Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Sep. 22, 2010. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Mar. 25, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Aug. 15, 2011. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/169,769, dated Mar. 24, 2010. |
| Application as Filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,984, dated Feb. 27, 2006. |
| Office Action in in U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,984, dated Dec. 26, 2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220138238 A1 | May 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62452701 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15885239 | Jan 2018 | US |
| Child | 17457757 | US |
