Patent Grant
6940783
This application relates generally to an apparatus and method for use in timing competitive play and more specifically to an apparatus for use in the timing of cup stacking competitions.
Cup stacking first became popular in the mid 90s as a method of teaching physical coordination, including hand-to-eye coordination, to youngsters. Cup stacking helps students use both sides of their bodies and brains, develop ambidexterity, develop quickness, and improve concentration. Cup stacking also helps teach sequencing and patterning, which can help in developing math and reading skills. Since the mid 90s, the sport has grown in popularity throughout the country, primarily in elementary schools, where it has become a part of many physical education programs. The sport involves stacking and unstacking a set of specially designed cups in pre-arranged sequences while being timed. The object of the competitions is to complete the sequence or sequences in as short a time as possible. There are several standard sequences and the competitions can be performed by an individual or by a team in a relay fashion.
Timing of the competition is usually performed by a judge with a stopwatch. The competitor begins with both hands face down on the table where the cups are to be stacked. The judge gives a verbal cue, usually “Ready, Get Set, Go”, starting the stopwatch on the word GO. Time is stopped when the last cup is down stacked in the particular sequence.
One of the major drawbacks to the sport has been the inaccuracy associated with having different individuals time the competitors using stopwatches. Errors in timing due to variations in human reaction time often exceed several tenths of a second and are significant (as much as 10% off) when measuring competitive times. Competitive times in this sport range from 2 to 15 seconds with winners of the competition usually determined by hundredths of seconds. To mitigate against the human reaction time, in final competitions, three judges are used and the high and low times are not counted against the competitor. This measure, however, is inefficient and does not cure the inaccuracies inherent with using human judges since the measured time to complete the sequence is still subjective.
Another drawback to the sport is the surface on which the cups are stacked. At present, there are no surfaces which are the same for competitions. Some tournaments use tables covered with short nap carpeting while others use a standard Formica table top. In addition, the competitors do not always have access to the competition surface in order to practice their sport in a competitive environment. This lack of consistency among the surfaces upon which the cups are stacked is a further problem for competitive cup stackers.
Each of the embodiments of the present invention described herein solves both the timing problem and the surface problem described above. Each of the embodiments includes a mat. The mat of the present invention may provide a consistent surface upon which cups are to be stacked. The present invention includes an embodiment where the mat is used as a surface upon which cups are stacked in a cup stacking competition or in practice for a cup stacking competition.
Most of the embodiments of the present invention also include a timing mechanism. The timing mechanism may be incorporated into the mat or otherwise be associated with the mat. In either case, the timing mechanism solves the inaccuracies associated with utilizing human judges.
One embodiment of the present invention describes an apparatus comprising support means, trigger means connected to the support means, and timing means operatively connected to the trigger means. Another embodiment of the present invention describes an apparatus comprising a mat, a pressure sensitive trigger connected to the mat, and a timer operatively connected to the trigger so that the timer begins to accrue time with a first activation of the trigger and stops with a second activation of the trigger.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention describes a system that has an apparatus and a plurality of cups. The apparatus of this embodiment comprises a mat, a trigger connected to the mat, and a timer operatively connected to the trigger so the timer begins to accrue time with a first activation of the trigger and stops with a second activation of the trigger.
The present invention also includes a method of timing a competition which comprises arming a trigger connected to a mat and operatively connected to a timer, starting the timer, completing the tasks on the mat, and stopping the timer. The present invention further includes a method of cup stacking utilizing a plurality of cups comprising placing a mat on a table or desk, stacking the plurality of cups on the mat, and unstacking the plurality of cups on the mat.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following best mode description, the drawings and the claims.
The figures which follow depict a preferred embodiment of the invention, and may depict various alternative embodiments. The invention is not limited to the embodiment or embodiments depicted herein since even further various alternative embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. For the ease of the reader, like reference numerals in various drawing figures refer to identical structural elements or components.
For the ease of the reader in referring to the drawings, the following component list is provided:
At the outset, it should be understood that this invention comprises a method and an apparatus for timing competitions, particularly, competitions focusing on hand eye coordination and manual dexterity and, more particularly, cup stacking competitions. The description which follows describes a preferred embodiment of the invention, and various alternative embodiments. It should be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, however, that various other alternative embodiments may be accomplished without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
The apparatus of the present invention uses a support member that can be placed on a table or other surface used for cup stacking competitions. Suitable support members include but are not limited to mats, pads, cushions, rugs, and the like. The support member is, preferably, a mat. The mat of the present invention can be made from any material that will provide a non-slip surface on the side of the mat that contacts the desk or other competition table and a smooth, even surface on the reverse side. One should note that the smooth and even side of the mat should not be too slick as the cups will be stacked on this surface of the mat and it is important that the cups not slip when placed on the mat. The mat can be made from various types of fabric (whether the fabric is used alone or in combination with a backing), various types of short nap carpeting, closed cell foam, vinyl covered surfaces, any combination of these, and the like.
It has been found that “mouse pad” material works well for the purposes of the present invention. The “mouse pad” material has a fabric surface bonded to a foam substrate or backing. The foam backing gives the mat integrity, while providing flexibility and a soft feel to the mat. The foam backing is also water resistant and provides a stable base throughout the life of the mat. The foam backing typically used in mouse pads is a closed cell foam, which also works with the present invention. As with mouse pads, the foam backing used in the present invention should have non-skid properties. These properties will allow the mat to be placed on a table or other surface and will prevent the mat from sliding while the cups are being stacked and unstacked.
The fabric surface provides a stacking surface that is smooth and even, yet does not allow the cups to stick to or slide. This is an important feature for the fabric surface because, if the fabric surface is too sticky, the stacking process may be negatively impacted. Conversely, if the fabric surface is too slippery, the cups will slide easily and cannot be quickly stacked. The fabric surface can be made of any fabric; for most mouse pads, a polyester fabric is used. However, a flocked fabric surface could also be suitable. In addition, the fabric surface can be imprinted or designed in various ways by any known methodology. Designs can include but are not limited to the school colors, mascots, and the like.
The mat can easily be stored by simply rolling the material into a tube. In addition, a bag or enclosure for housing the mat while it is not in use can be provided. The bag can be designed to house only the mat or the bag can be designed to house more, such as the cups and a timer. The mat can have bands or ties which will help secure and keep the mat in a rolled position, similar to the way that such bands or ties are used on sleeping bags.
It should be noted that the invention contemplates using the mat alone, either while the cup stacker is learning how to stack, practicing the stacking or competing in a cup stacking competition. In most of the embodiments of the present invention, the mat is connected to at least one trigger mechanism, which, in turn, is connected to a timer mechanism. The trigger mechanism starts and stops the timer. The mat can incorporate the trigger so that the mat and trigger form an integral unit or the trigger can be located apart from the mat. The trigger can be any type of trigger that will start and stop a timer, including but not limited to capacitive switches, inductive switches, photoelectric or photo optic sensors, dry contact switches or conductive contact points. The trigger should also meet the following criteria: 1) an extremely low profile so that the trigger(s) does not interfere with cup stacking; 2) tuned to filter out false signals, such as a cup being placed on the trigger; 3) covered with a film or other covering to keep the trigger safe from environmental conditions; 4) small amounts of pressure should be sufficient for the trigger to operate; and 5) be inexpensive. It has been found that a capacitive touch trigger or pressure sensitive trigger works well with the present invention. In addition, it has been found that, for the purposes of cup stacking competitions, two touch pad triggers work well. However, it should be noted that any number of touch pad triggers can be used with the present invention. For example, for use with a relay event in cup stacking, the mat can incorporate four or more touch pad triggers to allow each competitor in the relay team access to their own set of touch pad triggers. In addition, an array of sensors can also be created which allows the competitor to place two hands anywhere within a specified boundary to trigger the timer. This array can be constructed using any of the aforementioned types of sensors or any combination of the aforementioned sensors.
In one embodiment, the touch pad triggers are formed by printing conductive ink traces to the backside of a film covering. The traces conduct a signal generated from the touch pad triggers to a timer. The trigger area is formed by increasing the circular area of the trace. Thus, in this embodiment, the trigger is part of the trace. Wires are connected to the traces to conduct the signals generated to the timer. The film covering has an adhesive backing which adheres the film to the mat. The film covering can be made of any material. It has been found that Mylar works well as the film covering. In this embodiment, the traces are printed on the backside of the film covering and conduct signals from the trigger section to the timer mechanism. The wires can run along the bottom of the mat (the surface that will be laid on the table) as shown in
The timer mechanism can be any kind of timer that meets the following criteria: 1) is capable of timing to at least 0.01 seconds; 2) able to be started and stopped by the competitor without reliance on any third party; 3) predictable, repeatable, reusable, and reliable; 4) does not interfere with the stacking process; and 5) able to be operated using a free standing power source, such as batteries, for long periods of time without resort to auxiliary power sources. A timer found suitable for use with the present invention includes a timer constructed from standard electronic components, including a microprocessor to accurately keep time, an LED display, discrete light emitting diodes, a reset switch, a power switch and a power source. The power switch is shown in the figures as a toggle switch; however, it should be noted that type of switch is appropriate for use in the present invention. It may be preferable to have the power switch and the reset switch be different types of switches so that competitors and judges do not get confused over which switch accomplishes which function. The timer is, preferably, powered by batteries to allow for maximum portability of the mat and timer; however, the invention can incorporate a power coupling to allow the timer to be connected to a power supply or other suitable power source.
As shown in
A competitor will use the mat by first placing both hands on the touch pad triggers 30. Indicator lamps or light emitting diodes 25 and 27 (shown in
The competitor's hands will then leave the touch pad triggers, starting the timer. A readout display 21 indicates the amount of time that has passed. Once the sequence has been completed, both of the competitor's hands must again rest on the touch pad triggers. This will stop the timer. The final time remains on the readout display to allow the time to be recorded. To begin another timed sequence, the competitor or a judge pushes a reset button 23.
It should be appreciated that the timer could easily be connected, in any suitable manner, to a remote time display devices that would compute time or store time, such as a computer, or other electronic device that stores information (a palm pilot, etc.). In such an arrangement, a data cable would connect the timer which would be connected to the computer or other device (not shown). A computer program can direct the computer to begin accruing time when the trigger is activated, to stop accruing time when the trigger is reactivated, or the computer could simply display the time as calculated by the timer. Once time is stopped, the computer program could direct the judge or competitor to store the time or to delete the time.
The flowchart for the timing mechanism of one embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 6. The power is turned on in step 100. The timer then sets a variable T0 to be zero in step 105. When the variable, T0 is zero, the light emitting diodes are off. The touch pad triggers are activated by placing the hands of the competitor on or over the triggers and the microprocessor of the timer analyzes whether both touch pad triggers are activated, step 110. When both triggers are activated, the microprocessor adds 1 to the value of T0 in step 115, then compares the value of T0 to another preset variable, Tarm, in step 120. The microprocessor then determines whether T0 is greater than Tarm, step 120. If not, the microprocessor reverts to step 110. If T0 is greater than Tarm, the microprocessor directs current to the “ARM” light emitting diode, illuminating the diode, as shown in step 125. If not, the process begins again at step 110 until both pads have been activated for the required time Tarm.
The hands must be removed from both pads in order to move from the “ARM” state to accruing time. The “ARM” LED is the signal for the competitor to begin the competition. Once the competitor notices the illumination of the “ARM” LED, the competitor is then free to remove both hands from the touch pad triggers. Then, the microprocessor checks whether both touch pad triggers are activated, in step 130. If the pads are not activated, the “ARM” LED is turned off and the timer is started, step 135. A delay is built into this embodiment of the present invention, step 140. This delay prevents errant starting of the timer by the competitor if the competitor's hands were to leave the pads for less than 0.3 seconds. The delay of 0.3 seconds shown in step 140 is a debounce timer that does not affect the accumulating time of the competitor. The purpose of the delay is to eliminate errant STOP signals that could occur as the competitor's hands are leaving the triggers. Since actual competitive times of less than 0.3 seconds are not likely, the delay does not interfere with the function of the device and does not affect the measured time.
When the touch pad triggers are reactivated, the microprocessor checks to ensure that reactivation occurs on both touch pad triggers, step 145. If not, the timer keeps accruing time. If so, the timer is stopped, step 150. The final time is displayed on the display readout until the reset button is pressed, steps 155 and 160. Once the timer is reset, the variable T0 is set back to zero and the timer is ready to time another competition.
The principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention have been described in the foregoing specification. The invention which is intended to be protected herein should not, however, be construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed, as these are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. Variations and changes may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing best mode of carrying out the invention should be considered exemplary in nature and not as limiting to the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3649010 | Jeffrey et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3878675 | Prociuk | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4220330 | Montgomery | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4392176 | Kneip et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4518266 | Dawley | May 1985 | A |
| 4586709 | Godinet | May 1986 | A |
| 4700369 | Siegal et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703930 | Gilbert | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4818234 | Redington et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 5019950 | Johnson | May 1991 | A |
| 5057965 | Wilson | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5652975 | Hoskin | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5838638 | Tipton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844861 | Maurer | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5933102 | Miller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6181647 | Tipton et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6229764 | Tongue | May 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030231554 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |
