This patent specification is in the field of x-ray imaging of patients for screening or other purposes, and more specifically is directed to methods and systems for generating and displaying mammograms and tomosynthesis x-ray images in ways that improve their usefulness.
Breast cancer remains a significant threat to women's health. X-ray mammograms have long been a standard in screening patients for breast cancer or other abnormalities and also are widely used in diagnosis and treatment planning. X-ray mammography typically records the breast image on x-ray film but more recently digital x-ray image receptors have come into use, as in the Selenia™ mammography system available from Hologic Inc. of Bedford, Mass. and its division Lorad of Danbury, Conn. For mammograms, a cone-shaped or pyramid-shaped x-ray beam passes through the compressed breast and forms a two-dimensional projection image. Any one of a number of orientations can be used, such as cranial-caudal (CC) or MLO (mediolateral-oblique) orientation. More recently, breast x-ray tomosynthesis has been proposed. The technology typically involves taking two-dimensional (2D) projection images of the immobilized breast at each of a number of angles of the x-ray beam relative to the breast and processing the resulting x-ray measurements to reconstruct images of breast slices that typically are in planes transverse to the x-ray beam axis, such as parallel to the image plane of a mammogram of the same breast. The range of angles is substantially less than in computerized tomography, i.e. substantially less than 180°, e.g. ±15°. Tomosynthesis technology is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,486 filed Nov. 26, 2003; a prototype of a unit with at least some of the described features was shown at the 2003 Radiological Society of North America meeting in Chicago, Ill. Additional prototypes are in clinical testing in this country as of the filing of this patent specification. Other approaches to tomosynthesis also have been proposed: see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,496,557, 5,051,904, 5,359,637, 6,289,235, and 6,647,092, published U.S. Patent Applications Nos. 2001/0038861, 2004/066882, 2004/0066884, and 2004/0066904, and Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis (GE Brochure 98-5493, 11/98). How to reconstruct tomosynthesis images is discussed in D G Grant, “Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional imaging technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, Vol BME-19, #1, (January 1972), pp 20-28. The patents, applications, brochures, and article cited above are hereby incorporated by reference in this patent specification as though fully set forth herein.
In clinical use, it can be desirable for a number of reasons to assess both tomosynthesis images and conventional mammograms of the patient's breasts. For example, the decades of conventional mammograms have enabled medical professionals to develop valuable interpretation expertise. Mammograms may offer good visualization of microcalcifications, and can otter higher spatial resolution compared with tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis images may have different desirable characteristics—e.g., they may offer better visualization of structures that can be obscured by overlying or underlying tissue in a conventional mammogram. However, the inventors named herein have recognized that a challenge arises in assessing tomosynthesis images, either alone or in conjunction with mammograms of the same breast. Tomosynthesis images tend to look different from mammograms in that a given tomosynthesis image may not show anatomical structure seen in a mammogram or in another tomosynthesis image of the same breast; and, to the extent a tomosynthesis image shows structure that also is seen in the mammogram or in another tomosynthesis image, that structure may be at different relative places in the images. This can make it difficult to apply to tomosynthesis images the expertise built over years of experience reading mammograms, and difficult to visualize and assess the same structure from the different types of images. For these and other reasons, the inventors believe that a need exists for further improvements in the generation and presentation of such images to make them more useful to health professionals.
The disclosed process and system generate and display tomosynthesis slice images of a patient's breast such that an object in the breast is at same or at least matching relative places in each slice image in which it is visible and, preferably, also at the same or at least matching place as in a conventional mammogram of the same breast. To achieve this, the method and system obtain 2D x-ray projection data for tomosynthesis images and, preferably, at least one 2D x-ray projection mammogram of a patient's breast, preferably using in each case a cone-shaped or pyramid-shaped imaging x-ray beam, and generate tomosynthesis images such that they conform to the same geometric coordinate system and, preferably, to the same coordinate system as a 2D projection mammogram.
As a result, anatomical structures appear at geometrically matching or corresponding places in such tomosynthesis images and, preferably, in the mammogram. The tomosynthesis images can be generated in a two-step computer-implemented process that first reconstructs tomosynthesis images in an initial coordinate system in which objects are not or may not be at matching positions in different tomosynthesis images or in the mammogram, and then projects those images into another coordinate system, such as the coordinate system of the mammogram. Alternatively, the reconstruction can directly generate tomosynthesis images that match the appropriate coordinate system, e.g. the cone beam geometry of the mammogram. Still alternatively, the cone-shaped or pyramid-shaped beam can be simulated by scanning the breast with a fan-shaped x-ray beam or a beam having some other geometry. The term x-ray beam as used in this patent specification includes such simulated cone-shaped or pyramid-shaped beams.
In tomosynthesis images, the same objects #1 and #2 can appear at different locations relative to other structure in the breast as compared with a mammogram of the same breast, as illustrated in
The new approach described in this patent specification achieves a different result. Given the same data acquisition geometry (
The reason for the difference between
Conceptually, images such as in
Tomosynthesis slice images such as in
Reconstructing and displaying tomosynthesis slice images (
Another display method is to select a region of interest in a mammogram, for example by the health professional drawing or otherwise indicating a region of interest (ROI), and replacing the ROI with the corresponding portion of a selected tomosynthesis slice image. The particular tomosynthesis slice image or succession of such images can be selected by the health professions through an appropriate interface such a track ball or mouse buttons or wheel. The health professional can scroll up and down the height of the imaged breast and see tomosynthesis images within the ROI without losing landmark orientation relative to other parts of the breast that are still seen in the portion of the mammogram outside the ROI. Still in addition, the tomosynthesis x-ray measurements and/or images described above can be used to reconstruct or reformat slice images conforming to planes that are not parallel to the image plane of a mammogram, using image processing techniques known in technologies such as CT (computerized tomography) scanning, and to reconstruct or reformat 3D displays of the imaged breast or selected portions of the breast, for display alone or in conjunction with the display of one or more mammograms and/or 3D tomosynthesis slice images.
For the reconstruction processing carried out in unit 54, a geometry matrix can be defined from a geometry calibration file and input projection angles appropriate to unit 50 for use in backprojection, from fits to the matrix elements determined from a geometry calibration of unit 50 and input projection angles measured by an encoder in unit 50. Image processing and filtering can be carried out on the images prior to reconstruction, using image processing techniques known in technologies such as CT scanning and tomosynthesis. A known skin line correction can also be applied at this stage. A backprojection can then be carried out, one tomosynthesis slice at a time, using the geometry matrix as follows,
where Mi is the 3×4 geometry matrix for projection i, (x,y,z) is the location of an image pixel, and (dx,dy) is the location on the x-ray detector element or area for the line that connects a focal spot in source 18 and the image pixel. This method of backprojection is described, for example, in section 3.4 in Faugeras, O., Three-Dimensional Computer Vision, A Geometric Viewpoint, (MIT Press, 2001), hereby incorporated by reference in this specification.
In a first method, using Cartesian coordinates as in
The tomosynthesis image slices to be reconstructed can be parallel to a “default” reference plane as suggested by Equation 1 above. Alternatively, they can be at other preferred orientations, defined by a 4×4 matrix multiplication operation applied to the original 3×4 matrix M, according to:
For example, a preferred orientation can be an orientation in which a particular mammogram is taken.
Thus, the backprojection for reconstructing tomosynthesis slice images can involve:
It should be clear to those skilled in the relevant technology that the above description is only one example of implementing the new approach and that numerous variations are possible that are within the scope of the description above.
Thus, in one non-limiting example, this patent specification discloses a method comprising: obtaining tomosynthesis x-ray measurements and at least one 2D x-ray projection mammogram of a patient's breast, wherein the mammogram image and the tomosynthesis measurements are obtained using a cone-shaped or pyramid-shaped imaging x-ray beam, and reconstructing 2D tomosynthesis images from the tomosynthesis measurements, wherein the tomosynthesis images conform to the same geometric coordinate system as the 2D projection mammogram, whereby anatomical structures that appear in the mammogram appear at geometrically corresponding places in respective ones of the tomosynthesis images. The step or steps of reconstructing 2D tomosynthesis images can comprise using a computer-implemented cone beam reconstruction algorithm directly generating the tomosynthesis images. Alternatively, the step or steps of reconstructing the 2D tomosynthesis images can comprise generating information describing initial tomosynthesis images, in which tissue or objects in the breast that are at different heights in the breast but overlap in the mammogram appear at mismatched positions in the initial tomosynthesis images, and using the information describing the initial tomosynthesis images to generate final tomosynthesis images in which said tissue or objects appear at positions that match their positions in the mammogram. This alternative can be implemented by generating the initial tomosynthesis images in an initial coordinate system different from that of the mammogram, and processing the information describing the initial tomosynthesis images into tomosynthesis images that match the coordinate system of the mammogram. In the initial coordinate system, the initial tomosynthesis images may differ in pixel spacing while the final tomosynthesis images may have the same pixel spacing. The final pixel spacing may be the same as in the mammogram.
This patent specification also discloses, as another non-limiting example, an x-ray system comprising an x-ray data acquisition unit that uses a cone-shaped or pyramid shaped x-ray beam and an x-ray receptor to obtain tomosynthesis x-ray measurements and x-ray measurements for at least one 2D x-ray projection mammogram of a patient's breast, a pre-processor that receives said measurements from the x-ray receptor and subjects them to pre-processing operations, a tomo/mammo image reconstruction unit that receives the pre-processed images and subjects them to further processing to reconstructing 2D tomosynthesis images and a mammogram, wherein tissue or objects in the breast that are at different heights in the breast but appear superimposed in the mammogram appear at locations in the tomosynthesis images that are the same as or at least match their location in the mammogram, and a display unit that selectively displays one or more of the tomosynthesis images and the mammogram and is under the control of a used interface operated by a health professional. The image reconstruction unit can use a computer-implemented cone beam reconstruction algorithm directly generating the tomosynthesis images. Alternatively, the image reconstruction unit can generate information describing initial tomosynthesis images, in which tissue or objects in the breast that are at different heights in the breast but overlap in the mammogram appear at mismatched positions in the initial tomosynthesis images, and can use the information describing the initial tomosynthesis images to generate final tomosynthesis images in which said objects appear at positions that are the same as or at least match their positions in the mammogram. This alternative can be implemented by generating the initial tomosynthesis images in an initial coordinate system different from that of the mammogram, and processing the information describing the initial tomosynthesis images into tomosynthesis images that match the coordinate system of the mammogram. In the initial coordinate system, the initial tomosynthesis images may differ in pixel spacing while the final tomosynthesis images may have the same pixel spacing. The final pixel spacing may be the same as in the mammogram.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/804,915, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,248,882, filed Nov. 6, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/744,930, filed Jun. 19, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,811,758, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/263,216, filed Apr. 28, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,084,579, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/418,851, filed Mar. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,712,127, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/535,343, filed Aug. 4, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,155,421, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/667,650, filed Nov. 30, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,702,142, which is a National Stage Application of PCT/US2005/041941, filed Nov. 15, 2005, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/628,516, filed Nov. 15, 2004, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. To the extent appropriate, priority is claimed to each of the above applications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3502878 | Stewart | Mar 1970 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4160906 | Daniels et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4310766 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4496557 | Malen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4706269 | Reina et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4744099 | Huettenrauch et al. | May 1988 | A |
4773086 | Fujita et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4773087 | Plewes | Sep 1988 | A |
4819258 | Kleinman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821727 | Levene et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4969174 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5018176 | Romeas et al. | May 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | Jul 1991 | E |
5029193 | Saffer | Jul 1991 | A |
5051904 | Griffith | Sep 1991 | A |
5078142 | Siczek et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5163075 | Lubinsky et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5164976 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5289520 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5359637 | Webber | Oct 1994 | A |
5365562 | Toker | Nov 1994 | A |
5415169 | Siczek et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426685 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452367 | Bick et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526394 | Siczek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539797 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
5594769 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596200 | Sharma et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598454 | Franetzki et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609152 | Pellegrino et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
5657362 | Giger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668889 | Hara | Sep 1997 | A |
5719952 | Rooks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803912 | Siczek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818898 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828722 | Ploetz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5872828 | Niklason et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878104 | Ploetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5896437 | Ploetz | Apr 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005907 | Ploetz | Dec 1999 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091841 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6137527 | Abdel-Malek et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141398 | He et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175117 | Komardin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196715 | Nambu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233473 | Shepherd et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243441 | Zur | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256370 | Yavuz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272207 | Tang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289235 | Webber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292530 | Yavus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341156 | Baetz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375352 | Hewes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411836 | Patel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415015 | Nicolas et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6442288 | Haerer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459925 | Nields et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501819 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6556655 | Chichereau et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597762 | Ferrant et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611575 | Alyassin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620111 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633674 | Gemperline et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647092 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6744848 | Stanton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748044 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751285 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813334 | Koppe et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6882700 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885724 | Li et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912319 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940943 | Claus et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6978040 | Berestov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999554 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025725 | Dione et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7110490 | Eberhard et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110502 | Tsuji | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123684 | Jing et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127091 | Op De Beek et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142633 | Eberhard | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7245694 | Jing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7315607 | Ramsauer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319735 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323692 | Rowlands et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7430272 | Jing et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443949 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7702142 | Ren | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8712127 | Ren et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9084579 | Ren | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9811758 | Ren | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10248882 | Ren | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038861 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsujii | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050986 | Inoue et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075997 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030018272 | Treado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073895 | Nields et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095624 | Eberhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030149364 | Kapur | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030194050 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194051 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194115 | Kaufhold | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194121 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210254 | Doan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215120 | Uppaluri et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008809 | Webber | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040066882 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066884 | Hermann Claus et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066904 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094167 | Brady et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101095 | Jing et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109529 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040171986 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063509 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078797 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089205 | Kapur | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105679 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129172 | Mertelmeier | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135555 | Claus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135664 | Kaufhold | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050226375 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074288 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098855 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129062 | Nicoson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155209 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060291618 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030949 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036265 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076844 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070223651 | Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242800 | Jing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080019581 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045833 | Defreitas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080130979 | Ren et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090003519 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010384 | Jing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080594 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080602 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135997 | Defreitas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090268865 | Ren et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296882 | Gkanatsios et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304147 | Jing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054400 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086188 | Ruth et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100135558 | Ruth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195882 | Ren et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226475 | Smith et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20180137385 | Ren | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
775467 | May 1997 | EP |
982001 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1428473 | Jun 2004 | EP |
WO 9005485 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9816903 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0051484 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 03020114 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2005051197 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005 112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006055830 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Seale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005. |
Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98/5493, Nov. 1998. |
Dobbins JT et al. “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential” Physics in Medicine and Biology vol. 48, No. 19, pp. 65-81 (2003). |
Essentials for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography System, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-ENUS, 2006. |
European search report in connection with corresponding European patent application No. EP 06 25 5790, dated Aug. 17, 2007. |
European search report in connection with counterpart European Patent Application No. 05824734, dated May 9, 2011. |
Filtered Back Projection, (NYGREN) published May 8, 2007;URL: http://web.archive.org/web/1999101013 l 715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/-elec539/Projects97/cult/node2.html. |
Grant, DG, “Tomosynthesis, a three dimensional imagine technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed Engineering, vol. BME-19, #1, Jan. 1972, pp. 20-28. |
Heang-Ping Chan et al., “Roc study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005. |
Kita et al., “Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using simulation of breast deformation”, Proceedings 1998 IEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 23-25, 1998, pp. 700-707. |
Lorad Selenia Document B-BI-SEO US/Intl (May 2006) copyright Hologic 2006. |
Mammographic Accreditation Phantom, http://www.cirsinc.com/pdfs/015cp.pdf. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2005/041941, dated Sep. 25, 2008, 6 pgs. |
Pediconi, Federica et al., “Color-coded automated signal intensity curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of a new software for MR-based breast imaging”, International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086. |
Senographe 700 & 8OOT (GE); 2-page download on Jun. 22, 2006 from www.gehealthcare.com/inen/rad/whe/products/mswh800t.html.; Figures 1-7 on 4 sheets relateral shift compression paddle. |
Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190325255 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60628516 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15804915 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16369176 | US | |
Parent | 14744930 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15804915 | US | |
Parent | 14263216 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 14744930 | US | |
Parent | 13418851 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14263216 | US | |
Parent | 12535343 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13418851 | US | |
Parent | 11667650 | US | |
Child | 12535343 | US |