The present disclosure relates in general to signal processing systems, and more particularly, to multiple path signal processing systems.
The use of multipath analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and analog front ends (AFEs) (e.g., two or more path ADCs/AFEs) in electrical circuits is known. Example multipath ADCs and AFEs and use of them in multiple electrical circuit paths are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,956 entitled “Process and System for the Analog-to-Digital Conversion of Signals” to Jahne et al. (“Jahne patent”), U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,317 entitled “Apparatus for the Conversion of Analog Audio Signals to a Digital Data Stream” to Knoth et al. (“Knoth patent”) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,780 entitled “Gain Ranging Analog-to-Digital Converter with Error Correction” to Gong et al. (“Gong patent”). The use of multipath circuits may reduce noise as one path may be optimized for processing small amplitude signals (e.g., for processing low noise signals) while another circuit path with another set of ADC and AFE is optimized for large amplitude signals (e.g., allowing for higher dynamic range).
An example application for multipath ADCs/AFEs is use of it in a circuit for an audio system application, such as an audio mixing board or in a digital microphone system. Such an example application is disclosed in the Jahne patent. In designing a circuit with multipath ADCs/AFEs that are used in respective multiple circuit paths, a tradeoff may exist between allowing larger signal swing (e.g., to allow swing of a signal between larger scale amplitudes) and low noise. Furthermore, the multipath ADCs/AFEs may provide high dynamic range signal digitization, with higher dynamic range for a given input power, and lower overall area than would be possible with conventional means. In other words, by allowing a separate optimization for each type of signal (e.g., large and small signals) that is provided each respective path, multipath ADCs/AFEs allow the overall circuit to burn less power, consume less area, and save on other such design costs.
Despite their advantages, existing multipath ADC/AFE approaches have disadvantages and problems. For example, many existing approaches have disadvantages related to transitioning and switching between the multiple paths, as such switching may not be smooth, leading to undesirable signal artifacts, especially in audio applications in which such artifacts may be perceptible to a listener of an audio device. As another example, a trend in electric circuits is to scale circuitry to the integrated circuit level. However, existing approaches to multipath AFEs/ADCs do not scale well to the integrated circuit level.
In accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure, certain disadvantages and problems associated with implementation of multiple AFE/ADC paths may be reduced or eliminated.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, a processing system may include a plurality of processing paths including a first processing path and a second processing path, and an adaptive filter. The first processing path may be configured to generate a first digital signal based on an analog input signal and the second processing path is configured to generate a second digital signal based on the analog input signal. The adaptive filter may be configured to generate a filtered digital signal from the second digital signal and adapt its response to reduce a difference between the filtered digital signal and the first digital signal.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a method may include processing an analog input signal with a first processing path configured to generate a first digital signal based on the analog input signal; processing the analog input signal with a second processing path configured to generate a second digital signal based on the analog input signal, and adapting a response of an adaptive filter configured to generate a filtered digital signal from the second digital signal to reduce a difference between the filtered digital signal and the first digital signal.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a processing system may include a plurality of processing paths including a first processing path and a second processing path, and a linear correction subsystem. The first processing path may be configured to generate a first digital signal based on an analog input signal. The second processing path may be configured to generate a second digital signal based on the analog input signal. The linear correction subsystem may be configured to determine nonlinearities present in the second processing path based on comparison of the first digital signal and the second digital signal and apply a linear correction to the second digital signal to generate a corrected second digital signal with decreased nonlinearity from that of the second digital signal.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a method may include processing an analog input signal with a first processing path configured to generate a first digital signal based on the analog input signal, processing the analog input signal with a second processing path configured to generate a second digital signal based on the analog input signal, determining nonlinearities present in the second processing path based on comparison of the first digital signal and the second digital signal, and applying a linear correction to the second digital signal to generate a corrected second digital signal with decreased nonlinearity from that of the second digital signal.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a processing system may include a plurality of processing paths including a first processing path and a second processing path and a controller. The first processing path may include a first analog front end and a first digital processing subsystem having a first analog-to-digital converter, wherein the first analog front end is configured to amplify an analog input signal in accordance with a first analog gain in order to generate a first amplified analog signal and the first analog-to-digital converter is configured to convert the first amplified analog signal into a first digital signal. The second processing path may include a second analog front end and a second digital processing subsystem having a second analog-to-digital converter, wherein the second analog front end is configured to amplify the analog input signal in accordance with a second analog gain in order to generate a second amplified analog signal and the second analog-to-digital converter is configured to convert the second amplified analog signal into a second digital signal. The controller may be configured to generate a digital output signal of the processing system from one or both of the first digital signal and the second digital signal based on a magnitude of the analog input signal and set the first analog gain based on the magnitude of the analog input when the digital output signal is generated from the second digital signal.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a method may include processing an analog input signal with a first processing comprising a first analog front end and a first digital processing subsystem having a first analog-to-digital converter, wherein the first analog front end is configured to amplify the analog input signal in accordance with a first analog gain in order to generate a first amplified analog signal and the first analog-to-digital converter is configured to convert the first amplified analog signal into a first digital signal. The method may also include processing the analog input signal with a second processing path comprising a second analog front end and a second digital processing subsystem having a second analog-to-digital converter, wherein the second analog front end is configured to amplify the analog input signal in accordance with a second analog gain in order to generate a second amplified analog signal and the second analog-to-digital converter is configured to convert the second amplified analog signal into a second digital signal. The method may further include generating a digital output signal of the processing system from one or both of the first digital signal and the second digital signal based on a magnitude of the analog input signal and setting the first analog gain based on the magnitude of the analog input when the digital output signal is generated from the second digital signal.
Technical advantages of the present disclosure may be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the figures, description and claims included herein. The objects and advantages of the embodiments will be realized and achieved at least by the elements, features, and combinations particularly pointed out in the claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory examples and are not restrictive of the claims set forth in this disclosure.
A more complete understanding of the present embodiments and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
Integrated circuit 105 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to process analog input signal ANALOG_IN to generate a digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT and condition digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT for transmission over a bus to digital processor 109. Once converted to digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, the signal may be transmitted over significantly longer distances without being susceptible to noise as compared to an analog transmission over the same distance. In some embodiments, integrated circuit 105 may be disposed in close proximity with analog signal source 101 to ensure that the length of the analog line between analog signal source 101 and integrated circuit 105 is relatively short to minimize the amount of noise that can be picked up on an analog output line carrying analog input signal ANALOG_IN. For example, in some embodiments, analog signal source 101 and integrated circuit 105 may be formed on the same substrate. In other embodiments, analog signal source 101 and integrated circuit 105 may be formed on different substrates packaged within the same integrated circuit package.
Digital processor 109 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to process a digital output signal for use in a digital system. For example, digital processor 109 may comprise a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor (DSP), application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or any other device configured to interpret and/or execute program instructions and/or process data, such as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
Signal processing system 100 may be used in any application in which it is desired to process an analog signal to generate a digital signal. Thus, in some embodiments, signal processing system 100 may be integral to an audio device that converts analog signals (e.g., from a microphone) to digital signals representing the sound incident on a microphone. As another example, signal processing system 100 may be integral to a radio-frequency device (e.g., a mobile telephone) to convert radio-frequency analog signals into digital signals.
An ADC 215 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to convert an analog signal received at its input, to a digital signal representative of analog input signal ANALOG_IN. ADC 215 may itself include one or more components (e.g., delta-sigma modulator, decimator, etc.) for carrying out the functionality of ADC 215. Selected components for the example embodiments of ADCs 215a and 215b are discussed in greater detail below with respect to
A combiner 231 may receive a respective digital signal from each of processing paths 201 and may generate a resulting error signal representing a difference between the digital signals generated by processing paths 201.
An adaptive filter 229 may receive the digital signal generated by processing path 201b and the error signal generated by combiner 231 to generate a filtered digital signal and apply an adaptive response to the digital signal in order to reduce the error between the filtered digital signal and the digital signal generated by processing path 201a. Accordingly, adaptive filter 229 may comprise any suitable adaptive filter, including a least-mean-squares adaptive filter designed to adapt its response to reduce the error between the filtered digital signal and the digital signal generated by processing path 201a.
A multiplexer 227 may receive the digital signal generated by processing path 201a and the filtered digital signal generated by adaptive filter 229 and may select one of such digital signals as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT based on a control signal generated by and communicated from a controller 220.
Driver 219 may receive the digital signal DIGITAL_OUT output by ADC 215 and may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to condition such digital signal (e.g., encoding into Audio Engineering Society/European Broadcasting Union (AES/EBU), Sony/Philips Digital Interface Format (S/PDIF)), in the process generating digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT for transmission over a bus to digital processor 109. In
Controller 220 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus for selecting one of the digital signals output by the various processing paths 201 as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. In some embodiments, controller 220 may make such selection based on a magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a signal derivative thereof. For example, controller 220 may include an overload detector 221 that may determine whether or not a signal derivative of analog input signal ANALOG_IN (e.g., an output of a modulator 316a of delta-sigma modulator 308a, as shown in greater detail in
As another example, controller 220 may include a level detector 223 that may detect an amplitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a signal derivative thereof (e.g., a signal generated within ADC 215b) and communicate a signal indicative of such amplitude to state machine 225. Responsive to the signal received from level detector 223, state machine 225 may generate the control signal communicated to multiplexer 227. To illustrate, as analog input signal ANALOG_IN decreases from a relatively high amplitude to a lower amplitude, it may cross a threshold amplitude level whereby controller 220 may change the selection of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from the digital signal generated by processing path 201b (as filtered by adaptive filter 229 and which may be adapted for higher amplitudes of analog input signal ANALOG_IN) to the digital signal generated by processing path 201a (which may be adapted for lower amplitudes of analog input signal ANALOG_IN). In some embodiments, a threshold amplitude level whereby controller 220 may change the selection of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from the digital signal generated by processing path 201b (as filtered by adaptive filter 229) to the digital signal generated by processing path 201a may be lower than another threshold amplitude level whereby controller 220 may change the selection of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from the digital signal generated by processing path 201a to the digital signal generated by processing path 201b, in order to provide for hysteresis so that multiplexer 227 does not repeatedly switch between the paths.
As a further example, controller 220 may include an error monitor 233 that may monitor the error between the filtered digital signal generated by adaptive filter 229 and the digital signal generated by processing path 201a, and may generate a signal based on whether adaptation has converged (e.g., e.g., convergence of least-mean-squares adaption) and/or based on whether the error is below a threshold error level. Responsive to the signal received from error monitor 233, state machine 225 may generate the control signal communicated to multiplexer 227. To illustrate, in order for controller 220 to switch selection from the filtered digital signal generated by adaptive filter 229 to the digital signal generated by processing path 201a, in addition to all other conditions for such switch (e.g., magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN being below a threshold magnitude), controller 220 may also determine that the error between the filtered digital signal generated by adaptive filter 229 and the digital signal generated by processing path 201a is below a threshold error level and that the least-mean-squares adaptation of adaptive filter 229 has converged.
Also as shown in
Although AFEs 203a and 203b are described above having a non-inverting gain and an inverting gain, respectively, each of processing paths 201 may have approximately the same cumulative gain. Those of skill in the art may appreciate that simply applying a digital gain with a negative sign in either of ADC 215a or ADC 215b will negate the opposite polarities of the gains of AFEs 203.
As depicted in
In addition, ADC 215a may comprise a latency matching element 314 to match any signal latencies between processing path 201a and processing path 201b, while ADC 215b may comprise a phase matching element 317 to account for any phase offset between processing path 201a and processing path 201b. For example, phase matching element 317 may dynamically compensate for any phase mismatch between processing paths 201a and 201b by varying a delay of at least one of processing path 201a and processing path 201b. In some embodiments, phase matching element 317 may comprise a high-pass filter.
In some embodiments, a magnitude of a gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 may be substantially larger than (e.g., significantly more than manufacturing tolerances, one or more orders of magnitude) a magnitude of a gain of inverting amplifier 306. In addition, in these and other embodiments, a magnitude of digital gain element 310b may be substantially larger than (e.g., significantly more than manufacturing tolerances, one or more orders of magnitude) a magnitude of a gain of digital gain element 310a. Consequently, in such embodiments, a first path gain equal to the product of the magnitude of the gain of inverting amplifier 306 and the magnitude of a gain of digital gain element 310b may be substantially equal (e.g., within manufacturing tolerances) to a second path gain equal to the product of the magnitude of gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 and the gain of digital gain element 310a. As a specific example, in some embodiments, the inverting gain of inverting amplifier 306 may be approximately −6 decibels, the non-inverting gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 may be approximately 20 decibels, the gain of digital gain element 310a may be approximately −26 decibels, and the gain of digital gain element 310b may be approximately 0 decibels.
Accordingly, each processing path 201 may be adapted to process a particular amplitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN. For example, AFE 203a may be suited to process lower signal amplitudes, as non-inverting amplifier 304 may have a practically infinite input resistance, may have a relatively low level of input-referred noise as compared to inverting amplifier 306, and its larger gain may permit effective processing of smaller signals, but characteristics of AFE 203a may not be amenable to higher amplitudes. The high input resistance of non-inverting amplifier 304 may facilitate the use of a smaller capacitor area for high-pass filter 302 (as compared to traditional approaches for implementing high-pass filters) and thus may permit integration of circuitry of high-pass filter 302 into the same integrated circuit as non-inverting amplifier 304, inverting amplifier 306, ADC 215a, and/or ADC 215b. In addition, the ability to integrate circuitry into a single integrated circuit may allow for centralized control of the stimuli for switching between processing paths 201 by controller 220, and may allow for more direct timing control of the actual switching and transitioning between processing paths 201. For example, because circuitry is integrated into a single integrated circuitry, level detector 223 may receive an output of delta-sigma modulator 308b as an input signal, rather than receiving an output of ADC 215b.
On the other hand, AFE 203b may be suited to process higher signal amplitudes, as its lower gain will reduce the likelihood of signal clipping, and may provide for greater dynamic range for analog input signal ANALOG_IN as compared to traditional approaches.
Linear correction circuit 235 may receive a respective digital signal from each of processing paths 201 and may determine nonlinearities present in the second processing path based on comparison of the respective digital signals and apply, via combiner 237, a linear correction to the digital signal generated by processing path 201b in order to generate a corrected digital signal with decreased nonlinearity from that of the digital signal generated by processing path 201b. Example implementations of linear correction circuit 235 are described in greater detail below with respect to
Controller 220 may, based on one or more parameters (e.g., signals output by overload detector 221, level detector 223, etc.) select either the digital signal generated by processing path 201a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT or the corrected digital signal generated by the linear correction subsystem of linear correction circuit 235 and a combiner 237. For example, when the magnitude of analog input ANALOG_INPUT is greater than a threshold magnitude, controller 220 may select the corrected digital signal generated by the linear correction subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. On the other hand, when the magnitude of analog input ANALOG_INPUT is lesser than a threshold magnitude, controller 220 may select the digital signal generated by processing path 201a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. Thus, whenever controller 220 selects the corrected digital signal generated by the linear correction subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, processing path 201a may still be utilized to correct for nonlinearities present in processing path 201b.
In some embodiments, to further improve the linearity of the processing system implemented by integrated circuit 105A, the analog gain and digital gain of processing path 201a (e.g., analog gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 and the digital gain of digital gain element 310a) may be reconfigured by gain control signals generated by state machine 225 based on whether controller 220 selects the corrected digital signal generated by the linear correction subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT or selects the digital signal generated by processing path 201a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. For example, when controller 220 selects the corrected digital signal generated by the linear correction subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, controller 220 may set the analog gain of processing path 201a substantially smaller than the analog gain of processing path 201b (and correspondingly increase the digital gain of processing path 201a to provide a unity gain for all of processing path 201a). Accordingly, when the magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN is greater than a threshold magnitude, the analog gain of processing path 201a may be set substantially smaller than the analog gain of processing path 201b. By attenuating analog input signal ANALOG_IN with the analog gain of processing path 201a, harmonics present in processing path 201a may be reduced or eliminated. Furthermore, when magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN is lesser than the threshold magnitude, the analog gain of processing path 201a may be set substantially larger than the analog gain of processing path 201b, thus allowing processing path 201a to more effectively process the lower-magnitude signal when its output is selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
Combiner 241 may receive a respective digital signal from each of processing paths 201 and may generate a combined signal representing a sum of the digital signals generated by processing paths 201.
Divider 243 may receive the combined signal generated by combiner 241 and divide such signal by 2 in order to generate a corrected digital signal which is the average of the digital signals generated by processing paths 201.
Controller 220 may, based on one or more parameters (e.g., signals output by overload detector 221, level detector 223, etc.) select either the digital signal generated by processing path 201a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT or the corrected digital signal generated by the dynamic range enhancement subsystem of combiner 241 and divider 243. For example, when the magnitude of analog input ANALOG_INPUT is greater than a threshold magnitude, controller 220 may select the corrected digital signal generated by the dynamic range enhancement subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. On the other hand, when the magnitude of analog input ANALOG_INPUT is lesser than a threshold magnitude, controller 220 may select the digital signal generated by processing path 201a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. Thus, whenever controller 220 selects the corrected digital signal generated by the dynamic range enhancement subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, processing path 201a may still be utilized to enhance the dynamic range of processing path 201b.
In some embodiments, to further improve the dynamic range of the processing system implemented by integrated circuit 105B, the analog gain and digital gain of processing path 201a (e.g., the analog gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 and the digital gain of digital gain element 310a) may be reconfigured by gain control signals generated by state machine 225 based on whether controller 220 selects the corrected digital signal generated by the dynamic range enhancement subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT or selects the digital signal generated by processing path 201a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. For example, when controller 220 selects the corrected digital signal generated by the dynamic range enhancement subsystem as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, controller 220 may set the analog gain of processing path 201a substantially equal to the analog gain of processing path 201b (and correspondingly increase the digital gain of processing path 201a to provide a unity gain for all of processing path 201a). Furthermore, when the magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN is lesser than the threshold magnitude, the analog gain of processing path 201a may be set substantially larger than the analog gain of processing path 201b, thus allowing processing path 201a to more effectively process the lower-magnitude signal when its output is selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
Although the discussion above contemplates integrated circuit 105 of
For the purposes of the remainder of the detailed description of this application, the phrases “the digital output signal of ADC 215b” and “the digital output signal of processing path 201b” may generally refer to such digital output signal or a derivative thereof, such as, for example, the digital signal generated by adaptive filter 229 of integrated circuit 105, the digital signal generated by the linear correction subsystem of integrated circuit 105A, or the digital signal generated by the dynamic range enhancement subsystem of integrated circuit 105B.
Despite a designer's best efforts to match the first path gain and the second path gain, process variations, temperature variations, manufacturing tolerances, and/or other variations may lead to the first path gain and the second path gain being unequal. If switching between paths occurs when such path gains are unequal, signal artifacts may occur due to an instantaneous, discontinuous change in magnitude of the digital output signal between two gain levels. For example, in audio signals, such artifacts may include human-perceptible “pops” or “clicks” in acoustic sounds generated from audio signals.
In some embodiments, in order to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of such artifacts when switching selection between the digital output signal of ADC 215a and the digital output signal of ADC 215b, and vice versa, controller 220 may program an additional gain into one or both of processing paths 201 to compensate for differences in the first path gain and second path gain. This additional gain factor may equalize the first path gain and the second path gain. To illustrate, controller 220 may determine a scale factor indicative of the magnitude of difference (e.g., whether an intentional difference or unintentional mismatch) between the first path gain of processing path 201a and the second path gain of processing path 201b. The controller may determine the first path gain and the second path gain by comparing the digital output signals of each processing path to analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a derivative thereof. If such digital output signals have been filtered by a high-pass filter (e.g., high-pass filters 312), a direct-current offset between the signals may be effectively filtered out, which may be necessary to accurately compute the relative path gains. Controller 220 may determine the scale factor by calculating one of a root mean square average of the first path gain and the second path gain and a least mean squares estimate of the difference between the first path gain and the second path gain. Prior to switching selection between the first digital signal generated by ADC 215a and the second digital signal generated by ADC 215b (or vice versa), controller 220 may program an additional gain into one of processing paths 201 to compensate for the gain difference indicated by the scale factor. For example, controller 220 may calibrate one or both of the first path gain and the second path gain by applying a gain equal to the scale factor or the reciprocal of the gain factor (e.g., 1/gain factor), as appropriate. Such scaling may be performed by modifying one or both of digital gains 310. In some embodiments, controller 220 may apply the additional gain to the processing path 201 of the digital signal not selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. For example, controller 220 may apply the additional gain to processing path 201a when the digital signal of ADC 215b is selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT and apply the additional gain to processing path 201b when the digital signal of ADC 215a is selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
In some embodiments, the additional gain, once applied to a path gain of a processing path 201, may be allowed over a period of time to approach or “leak” to a factor of 1, in order to constrain the additional gain and compensate for any cumulative (e.g., over multiple switching events between digital signals of ADCs 215) bias in the calculation of the additional gain. Without undertaking this step to allow the additional gain to leak to unity, multiple switching events between paths may cause the gain factor to increase or decrease in an unconstrained manner as such additional gain, if different than unity, affects the outputs of the multiple paths and thus affects the calculation of the scaling factor.
In some embodiments, switching selection of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from the digital signal of ADC 215a to the digital signal of ADC 215b (or vice versa), may occur substantially immediately. However, in some embodiments, to reduce or eliminate artifacts from occurring when switching selection of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from the digital signal of ADC 215a to the digital signal of ADC 215b (or vice versa), controller 220 and multiplexer 227 may be configured to transition continuously or in steps digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from a first digital signal to a second digital signal such that during such transition, digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT is a weighted average of the first digital signal and the second digital signal wherein a weight of the second digital signal relative to a weight of the first digital signal increases during the transition. For example, if a transition is desired between digital signal of ADC 215a and digital signal of ADC 215b as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, such transition may be in steps, wherein in each step, controller 220 and/or multiplexer 227 weighs digital signals output by ADCs 215 as follows:
1) 100% digital signal of ADC 215a and 0% digital signal of ADC 215b;
2) 80% digital signal of ADC 215a and 20% digital signal of ADC 215b;
3) 60% digital signal of ADC 215a and 40% digital signal of ADC 215b;
4) 30% digital signal of ADC 215a and 70% digital signal of ADC 215b;
5) 10% digital signal of ADC 215a and 90% digital signal of ADC 215b; and
6) 0% digital signal of ADC 215a and 100% digital signal of ADC 215b.
As another example, if a transition is desired between digital signal of ADC 215b and digital signal of ADC 215a as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, such transition may be in steps, wherein in each step, controller 220 and/or multiplexer 227 weighs digital signals output by ADCs 215 as follows:
1) 100% digital signal of ADC 215b and 0% digital signal of ADC 215a;
2) 70% digital signal of ADC 215b and 30% digital signal of ADC 215a;
3) 60% digital signal of ADC 215b and 40% digital signal of ADC 215a;
4) 20% digital signal of ADC 215b and 80% digital signal of ADC 215a;
5) 5% digital signal of ADC 215b and 95% digital signal of ADC 215a; and
6) 0% digital signal of ADC 215b and 100% digital signal of ADC 215a.
In some embodiments, a transition in digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT (either continuously or in steps) from the digital signal of ADC 215a to the digital signal of ADC 215b (or vice versa) may occur over a defined maximum duration of time. In these and other embodiments, when transitioning (either continuously or in steps) digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT from the digital signal of ADC 215b to the digital signal of ADC 215a, a rate of transition may be based on a magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN (e.g., the rate of transition may be faster at lower amplitudes and slower at higher amplitudes). In such embodiments, the minimum rate of such transition may be limited such that the transition occurs over a defined maximum duration of time, wherein the maximum duration of time is independent of the magnitude of the analog input signal.
This disclosure encompasses all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Similarly, where appropriate, the appended claims encompass all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Moreover, reference in the appended claims to an apparatus or system or a component of an apparatus or system being adapted to, arranged to, capable of, configured to, enabled to, operable to, or operative to perform a particular function encompasses that apparatus, system, or component, whether or not it or that particular function is activated, turned on, or unlocked, as long as that apparatus, system, or component is so adapted, arranged, capable, configured, enabled, operable, or operative.
All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical objects to aid the reader in understanding the disclosure and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4446440 | Bell | May 1984 | A |
4493091 | Gundry | Jan 1985 | A |
4890107 | Pearce | Dec 1989 | A |
4972436 | Halim et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4999628 | Kakaubo et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4999830 | Agazzi | Mar 1991 | A |
5077539 | Howatt | Dec 1991 | A |
5148167 | Ribner | Sep 1992 | A |
5198814 | Ogawara et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5321758 | Charpentier et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323159 | Imamura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5343161 | Tokumo et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5550923 | Hotvet et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5600317 | Knoth et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5714956 | Jahne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719641 | Mizoguchi | Feb 1998 | A |
5808575 | Himeno et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810477 | Abraham et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6088461 | Lin | Jul 2000 | A |
6201490 | Kawano et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6271780 | Gong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6333707 | Oberhammer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353404 | Kuroiwa | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6542612 | Needham | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6683494 | Stanley | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6745355 | Tamura | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768443 | Willis | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6822595 | Robinson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6853242 | Melanson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888888 | Tu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897794 | Kuyel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7020892 | Levesque et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023268 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7061312 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7167112 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216249 | Fujiwara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7279964 | Bolz et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302354 | Zhuge | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312734 | McNeill | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315204 | Seven | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7365664 | Caduff et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7403010 | Hertz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7440891 | Shozakai et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7522677 | Liang | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7583215 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7671768 | De Ceuninck | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7679538 | Tsang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7893856 | Ek et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8060663 | Murray et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8130126 | Breitschaedel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8289425 | Kanbe | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8330631 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8362936 | Ledzius et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8483753 | Behzad et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508397 | Hisch | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8717211 | Miao et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8786477 | Albinet | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8836551 | Nozaki | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873182 | Liao et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878708 | Sanders et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8952837 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9071267 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9071268 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9118401 | Nieto et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9148164 | Schneider et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9171552 | Yang | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9210506 | Nawfal et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9306588 | Das et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9337795 | Das et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9391576 | Satoskar et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9525940 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9543975 | Melanson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9584911 | Das et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9596537 | He et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9635310 | Chang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20010001547 | Delano et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010009565 | Singvall | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20040078200 | Alves | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040184621 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050258989 | Li et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276359 | Xiong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060056491 | Lim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064037 | Shalon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098827 | Paddock et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060284675 | Krochmal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026837 | Bagchi | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057720 | Hand et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092089 | Seefeldt et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103355 | Yamada | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120721 | Caduff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123184 | Nesimoglu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080030577 | Cleary et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080114239 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143436 | Xu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159444 | Terada | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198048 | Klein et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080292107 | Bizjak | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021643 | Hsueh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058531 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084586 | Nielsen | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090220110 | Bazarjani et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100183163 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110013733 | Martens et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025540 | Katsis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029109 | Thomsen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110063148 | Kolze et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110096370 | Okamoto | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110136455 | Sundstrom et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150240 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170709 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188671 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110228952 | Lin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242614 | Okada | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268301 | Nielsen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285463 | Walker et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120001786 | Hisch | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047535 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120133411 | Miao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120177201 | Ayling et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120177226 | Silverstein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188111 | Ledzius et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120207315 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242521 | Kinyua | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250893 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263090 | Porat et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280726 | Colombo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130095870 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130106635 | Doi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129117 | Thomsen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130188808 | Pereira et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130241753 | Nozaki | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241755 | Chen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140044280 | Jiang | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140105256 | Hanevich et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105273 | Chen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140126747 | Huang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135077 | Leviant et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140184332 | Shi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140269118 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140368364 | Hsu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150009079 | Bojer | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150170663 | Disch et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150214974 | Currivan | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150214975 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150249466 | Elyada | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150295584 | Das et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150381130 | Das et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160072465 | Das et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080862 | He et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080865 | He et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160173112 | Das et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160286310 | Das et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160365081 | Satoskar et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170047895 | Zanbaghi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170150257 | Das et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0966105 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1575164 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1753130 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1798852 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2207264 | Jul 2010 | EP |
1599401 | Sep 1981 | GB |
2119189 | Nov 1983 | GB |
2307121 | Jun 1997 | GB |
2507096 | Apr 2014 | GB |
2527637 | Dec 2015 | GB |
2527677 | Oct 2016 | GB |
2539517 | Dec 2016 | GB |
2008294803 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO0054403 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0237686 | May 2002 | WO |
2008067260 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2014113471 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2015160655 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016040165 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016040171 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016040177 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016160336 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016202636 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Thaden, Rainer et al., A Loudspeaker Management System with FIR/IRR Filtering; AES 32nd International Conference, Hillerod, Denmark, Sep. 21-23, 2007; pp. 1-12. |
Thaden, Rainer et al., A Loudspeaker Management System with FIR/IIR Filtering; Slides from a presentation given at the 32nd AES conference “DSP for Loudspeakers” in Hillerod, Denmark in Sep. 2007; http://www.four-audio.com/data/AES32/AES32FourAudio.pdf; 23 pages. |
GB Patent Application No. 1419651.3, Improved Analogue-to-Digital Convertor, filed Nov. 4, 2014, 65 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1506258.1, Oct. 21, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/025329, mailed Aug. 11, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/048633, mailed Dec. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/048591, mailed Dec. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1510578.6, Aug. 3, 2015, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2015/056357, mailed Jan. 29, 2015, 13 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1514512.1, Feb. 11, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2015/048609, mailed Mar. 23, 2016, 23 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2016/022578, mailed Jun. 22, 2016, 12 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1600528.2, Jul. 7, 2016, 8 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1603628.7, Aug. 24, 2016, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/EP2016/062862, mailed Aug. 26, 2016, 14 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1602288.1, Aug. 9, 2016, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2016/065134, mailed Mar. 15, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2016/040096, mailed Mar. 24, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2017/014240, dated Apr. 24, 2017. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) of the UKIPO, Application No. GB1620427.3, dated Jun. 1, 2017. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) of the UKIPO, Application No. GB1620428.1, dated Jul. 21, 2017. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3), United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Application No. GB1700371.6, dated Aug. 1, 2017. |