The present techniques relate to the use of injection of fluids in hydrocarbon production. Specifically, techniques are disclosed for using prepacked screens to prevent plugging of injection wells.
This section is intended to introduce various aspects of the art, which may be associated with exemplary embodiments of the present techniques. This discussion is believed to assist in providing a framework to facilitate a better understanding of particular aspects of the present techniques. Accordingly, it should be understood that this section should be read in this light, and not necessarily as admissions of prior art.
Modern society is greatly dependent on the use of hydrocarbons for fuels and chemical feedstocks. Hydrocarbons are generally found in subsurface rock formations that can be termed “reservoirs.” Removing hydrocarbons from the reservoirs depends on numerous physical properties of the rock formations, such as the permeability of the rock containing the hydrocarbons, the ability of the hydrocarbons to flow through the rock formations, and the proportion of hydrocarbons present, among others.
Easily produced sources of hydrocarbon are dwindling, leaving less accessible sources to satisfy future energy needs. However, as the costs of hydrocarbons increase, these less accessible sources become more economically attractive.
Injection of fluids, such as water or gas, has been used in the oil and gas field to maintain reservoir pressure, accelerate production, and increase reserve recovery. In weakly consolidated reservoirs, downhole sand control is required in injection wells. Common methods to control sand production include standalone screens, cased-hole or open-hole gravel packs, and frac packs. Their performance has been mixed, particularly in long-term reliability. Well fills causing injection disruption may occur. Any reduced or delayed water injection would adversely affect the hydrocarbon production.
Wire-wrap screen or mesh screens are common standalone screens for injection sand control. Plugging and erosion have been two major causes in downhole sand control failures. Screen plugging could result from poor injection water quality and formation sand carried by the water hammer effect or the cross flow during shut-ins. Screen erosion could develop from high local outflow due to progressive plugging or non-uniform formation collapse in the wellbore annulus. The eroded screen allows formation sand into the screen basepipe during either planned or unplanned shut-ins. The settling of formation sand inside the screen eventually blocks the entire completion interval and ceases the injection.
A conventional prepack screen includes a gravel pack or a resin-coated gravel pack placed between two concentric sand barriers (e.g., screens) to better control sand than a screen alone (U.S. Pat. No. 1,256,830 (1918), API-41-134 (1941), U.S. Pat. No. 3,280,915 (1966), U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,646 (1983), U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,049 (1991), U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,513 (1996)). Historically, plugging has been encountered in the prepack screens either during installation or production. Nowadays, prepack screens are only considered across clean, coarse, well-sorted, and homogeneous sands in high-angle wells. Commercial prepack screens are available, and include but not limited to Dual-Screen Prepack Screen, DeltaPak™, Micro-PAK®, WeldSlot PP, and SLIM-PAK™.
Gravel pack or frac pack has been effective in the matrix injection for sand control. However, as the injection went beyond fracture pressure, which is not uncommon to obtain the desired injectivity, loss of the annular gravel pack into the fractures results in a partial standalone screen completion and the accompanied erosion potential.
Resin-coated sand/proppant and fiber network were developed to reinforce gravel pack to prevent gravel loss. They often require downhole temperature or stress to cure over time up to a certain compressive strength, although few products cured using activators do not need stress. They also may require on-site chemical fly and monitoring to activate resin consolidation. The return chemicals and resin-coated sand must have properly disposal procedures. These multifaceted factors add complexity to both design and operations in gravel pack or frac pack. Any local resin-coated sand pack with insufficient strength may fail to fulfill the intent of preventing gravel loss.
An embodiment described herein provides a system for sand control for a well. The system includes a well drilled through the reservoir, or in the well includes a pipe joint including a prepack screen assembly mounted thereon. The prepack screen assembly includes an inner screen including openings having an inner size, and outer screen including openings having an outer size. Packing material is disposed between the inner screen and the outer screen. The packing material includes pores having a pore size that is selected based, at least in part, on the outer size, the inner size, or both.
Another embodiment described herein provides a method for designing a prepack screen assembly for sand control. The method includes analyzing a type of well in which the prepack screen assembly is going to be used. A screen design and screen sizes for the prepack assembly are selected, wherein the screens include an inner screen with openings having an inner size, and an outer screen with openings having an outer size. Packing for the prepack screen assembly is designed, wherein the packing includes pores comprising a pore size that is selected based, at least in part, on the outer size, the inner size, or both. The prepack screen assembly is placed on a pipe joint, and the pipe joint is placed in a well.
Another embodiment described herein provides a prepack screen assembly. The prepack screen assembly includes an inner screen including openings having an inner size and an outer screen including openings having an outer size. Packing material is disposed between the inner screen and the outer screen. The packing material includes pores with a pore size that is selected, based at least in part, on the outer size, the inner size, or both.
The advantages of the present techniques are better understood by referring to the following detailed description and the attached drawings, in which:
In the following detailed description section, specific embodiments of the present techniques are described. However, to the extent that the following description is specific to a particular embodiment or a particular use of the present techniques, this is intended to be for exemplary purposes only and simply provides a description of the exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, the techniques are not limited to the specific embodiments described below, but rather, include all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents falling within the true spirit and scope of the appended claims.
At the outset, for ease of reference, certain terms used in this application and their meanings as used in this context are set forth. To the extent a term used herein is not defined below, it should be given the broadest definition persons in the pertinent art have given that term as reflected in at least one printed publication or issued patent. Further, the present techniques are not limited by the usage of the terms shown below, as all equivalents, synonyms, new developments, and terms or techniques that serve the same or a similar purpose are considered to be within the scope of the present claims.
As used herein, two locations in a reservoir are in “fluid communication” when a path for fluid flow exists between the locations. For example, the establishment of fluid communication between an injection well and a production well may force hydrocarbons through a reservoir towards the production well for collection and production as water or gas is injected into the reservoir through injection well. As used herein, a fluid includes a gas or a liquid and may include, for example, a produced hydrocarbon, an injected mobilizing fluid, such as gas or water, among other materials.
“Facility” as used in this description is a tangible piece of physical equipment through which hydrocarbons and other fluids are either produced from a reservoir or injected into a reservoir, or equipment which can be used to control production or completion operations. In its broadest sense, the term facility is applied to any equipment that may be present along the flow path between a reservoir and its delivery outlets. Facilities may comprise production wells, injection wells, well tubulars, wellhead equipment, gathering lines, manifolds, pumps, compressors, separators, surface flow lines, steam generation plants, processing plants, and delivery outlets. In some instances, the term “surface facility” is used to distinguish those facilities other than wells.
A “hydrocarbon” is an organic compound that primarily includes the elements hydrogen and carbon, although nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, metals, or any number of other elements may be present in small amounts. As used herein, hydrocarbons generally refer to components found in oil, natural gas, or other types of organic compounds found in hydrocarbon reservoirs.
“Pressure” is the force exerted per unit area by a fluid, such as water, gas, or hydrocarbons, on the walls of the volume measured. Pressure can be shown as pounds per square inch (psi). “Atmospheric pressure” refers to the local pressure of the air. “Absolute pressure” (psia) refers to the sum of the atmospheric pressure (14.7 psia at standard conditions) plus the gauge pressure (psig). “Gauge pressure” (psig) refers to the pressure measured by a gauge, which indicates only the pressure exceeding the local atmospheric pressure (i.e., a gauge pressure of 0 psig corresponds to an absolute pressure of 14.7 psia). The term “vapor pressure” has the usual thermodynamic meaning. For a pure component in an enclosed system at a given pressure, the component vapor pressure is essentially equal to the total pressure in the system.
As used herein, a “reservoir” is a subsurface rock or sand formation from which a production fluid, or resource, can be harvested. The rock formation may include sand, granite, silica, carbonates, clays, and organic matter, such as bitumen, heavy oil, oil, gas, or coal, among others. Reservoirs can vary in thickness from less than one foot (0.3048 m) to hundreds of feet (hundreds of m). The resource is generally a hydrocarbon, such as a heavy oil impregnated into a sand bed.
“Substantial” when used in reference to a quantity or amount of a material, or a specific characteristic thereof, refers to an amount that is sufficient to provide an effect that the material or characteristic was intended to provide. The exact degree of deviation allowable may in some cases depend on the specific context.
A “wellbore” is a hole in the subsurface made by drilling or inserting a conduit into the subsurface. A wellbore may have a substantially circular cross section or any other cross-sectional shape, such as an oval, a square, a rectangle, a triangle, or other regular or irregular shapes. As used herein, the term “well,” when referring to an opening in the formation, may be used interchangeably with the term “wellbore.”
Revised designs for prepack screens to improve sand control in injection wells are described in examples herein. As used herein, an injection well includes wells used for injecting fluids, such as water or gas, for example, for enhanced recovery of hydrocarbons from reservoirs. Other types of injection wells may also use the designs described herein, such as injection wells used for sequestration of carbon dioxide, and saltwater disposal wells, among others. More specifically, the proposed prepack screens address the potential for well fills by formation material, such as sand. When injection wells are shut in, material from the formation may be drawn into the well from pressure changes, plugging the well.
Although the designs described are generally focused towards injection wells, they may be used in production wells as well. Further, in some examples, the designs are used in wells that may be used as injection wells or production wells at different points in time. Further, the designs may be used with any number of completion options, including, for example, a standalone screen, a gravel pack or frac pack, a shunted zonal isolation packer, a shunted zonal eccentric packer, an inflow control device or inflow control valve, a zonal isolation completion, a maze flow completion or a self-mitigating screen similar to the disclosures in U.S. Pat. No. 7,464,752, a multiple compartments completion, or a hybrid completion similar to the disclosures in US 2017/0044880. The type of well, injection, production, or alternating between injection and production, is considered in the design of the prepack screens.
The advance of emerging technology like zonal isolation, inflow control devices, shape memory materials, and three-dimensional (3D) printing may further expand the opportunities. For example, the prepack screens may be used to form multiple prepack screen assemblies in compartments along a pipe joint. The use of a series of separate compartments, along with check valves installed in inlets on the basepipe, may prevent material contamination from damaging a prepack screen covering an entire joint. The check valves on the basepipe prevent majority flow in production direction during shut-ins of an injection well. Thus, if a hotspot, such as screen erosion and material infiltration into the prepack screen occurs, the incoming formation material may be trapped in the prepack screen of the separate compartment, preventing loss of water injection through the entire pipe joint.
As the water 106 is injected into the reservoir 102, it may form a flow front 114 that forces hydrocarbons 116 towards the production wells 112, where it is brought to wellheads 118 or pumps, such as pump jacks, at the surface 120. Some of the water 106 from the injection is entrained with the hydrocarbons 116 as they are produced.
In this example, the hydrocarbons 116 are brought to a separation facility 122 at the surface 120. In the separation facility 122, the water 106 entrained with the hydrocarbons 116 may be separated from the hydrocarbons 116, resulting in a clean hydrocarbon stream 124 which may be sent through a pipeline, railcar, or truck for transport to a refining facility. The water 106 separated from the hydrocarbons 116 may then be returned to the injection well head 126 to be combined with other water sources, and reinjected into the injection well 104. In an example, the injection well head 126 is used for a disposal well, such as for wastewater from fracking operations.
Injection wells have several significant differences from production wells. First, an injection well delivers an injection fluid 204 from surface via a single basepipe 212 to the completion interval 214. In a standalone screen completion with an unpacked annulus, for example, with an undamaged screen, the greatest flow 206 of the fluid entering the completion interval may be radially outward at the leading section of the screen into the wellbore annulus 216. The greatest flow 206, in this example, is due to a lower back pressure across the screen of the unpacked screen assembly 202 allowing higher flow in the early portion screen. The high flow velocity leads to high erosion potential for the wellbore annulus 216 in the leading section 218 of the unpacked screen assembly 202.
Further, an injection well is subject to periodic shut-ins. During a shut-in, a water hammer effect, cross flow, or both could shear fail the formation sand, or other solids, toward the surface of the unpacked screen assembly 202. Some sand will pass through the unpacked screen assembly 202 before the surface of unpacked screen assembly 202 is bridged off by the sand 220. The sand 220 that is accumulated inside the single basepipe 212 may not be cleaned out after the injection is resumed. Accordingly, the wellbore annulus 222 is expected to be, at least, partially open during injection and to be, at least, partially filled during shut-in due to cross flow. Further, this cycle is repeated during each shut-in, which may result in long-term damage or plugging of the unpacked screen assembly 202.
In this example, the openings of the unpacked screen assembly 202 are termed keystone slots, or openings, as the larger opening faces inward towards the basepipe 212, and the smaller opening faces outward towards the wellbore annulus 222. In other examples described herein, openings in screen assemblies may have a larger opening facing towards the wellbore annulus and a smaller opening facing towards a basepipe. This type of opening would be termed an inverse-keystone slot.
In this example, the resistance to flow in the prepack screen assembly 302 provides continuous outflow regulation of the injection fluid 312, leading to more evenly distributed outflow 314 of the injection fluid 312 along the prepack screen assembly 302 to the wellbore annulus 316 without compromising the flow into the well. A more uniform injection profile delays or avoids erosion of the prepack screen assembly 302 or the side 318 of the wellbore 320. The prepack screen assembly 302 can be combined with an inflow control device, which provides more equalized outflow between screen joints. The use of the inflow control device may also decrease the chances of a water hammer damaging the prepack screen assembly 302.
The prepack screen assembly 302 may also provide better sand retention during shut-in, due to improved suppression of water hammer and cross flow, than a single-barrier standalone screen. The three sand retention barriers, the inner screen 306, the outer screen 308, and the packing material 310, in the prepack screen assembly 302 provide a more flexible design and less sand production during each shut-in. In examples described herein, the inner screen 306, the outer screen 308 or both, may include a slip-on wire wrap screen, a direct-wrap wire wrap screen, a premium screen, a protective shroud, or any combinations thereof.
Accordingly, due to reduced erosion risk and better filtering, the prepack screen assembly 302 delays well fill by reducing formation sand into the basepipe during shut-ins, potentially leading to a longer life for the well. Due to reduced erosion risk and better filtering, prepack delays well fill by reducing formation sand into basepipe during shut-ins.
In an example, the design 500 the prepack screen 400 includes an inner screen 508 that is an 8 gauge (1 gauge=0.001 inch, 0.00254 cm) direct-wrap screen, a 14 (1400 micrometers (μm)) or 12/18 (1700/1000 μm) U.S. Mesh resin-coated proppant as the prepack material 512, and an outer screen 502 that is a 9 gauge outer wire-wrap screen. The inner screen 508 filters the injected water, similar to a standalone screen or a gravel pack screen. The prepack screen 400 is sized to not to restrict any solids passing through the inner screen 508 to avoid plugging from injected solids entrained in the injection fluid, such as water, during the injection. The design 500 decreases the chances of plugging the prepack screen 400 with the injected fluid. Other types and sizes for the prepack and screens may be used for other applications.
In some examples, the slots 504 in the outer screen 502 are also sized according to the formation size for effective sand retention. During shut-ins, some invasion of material from the formation into the prepack screen 400 is expected before a stable sand bridge is formed on the outer screen 502. A properly designed prepack screen 400 undergoes self-cleaning cycles as the flow alternates between injection and production, e.g., water hammer or cross flow. The self-cleaning cycles made clear sand caught in the slots 504, may allow sand particles to flow through the inner screen and the outer screen back to the wellbore annulus when injection is restarted, or both. Any fines that pass through the prepack screen 400 during cross flow are considered to have a low plugging risk when transported through the inner screen 508 and prepack at the low pressure interval.
The outer screen 706 could incorporate erosion barriers 708, including ,for example, shields, or rings, with openings 710 that are offset to perforations 712 on the basepipe 704 offset on the basepipe. The rib wires 714 on the between wrap wire of the inner screen 716 and the basepipe 704 could be perforated or castellated to better distribute the inflow or outflow and reduce erosion potential. The basepipe 704 may include grooves 718 to more evenly distribute the flow between the screen wrap of the inner screen 716 and the perforations 712 in the basepipe 704.
As described herein, the size of the packing material used in the prepack 720 may be selected based, at least in part, on the size of the openings of the inner screen 716 and outer screen 706. In some examples, the packing material used for the prepack 720 includes gravel particles selected from sizes ranging between about 8 U.S. mesh and about 80 U.S. mesh, for example, about 14 U.S. mesh, or another example about 20 U.S. mesh, or another example about 12 U.S. mesh to about 18 U.S. mesh. The radial thickness of packing material depends on the diameters of the inner screen 716 and the outer screen 706. In some examples, the packing material used in the prepack 720 is between about 0.25 inches (about 0.64 cm) and about 1 inch (about 2.54 cm) in thickness. In other examples the packing material used in the prepack 720 is between about 0.5 inches (about 1.3 cm) and about 0.75 inches (about 2 cm) in thickness.
The prepack 720 may be a resin-coated proppant pack cured in a factory, which allows product inspection and more consistent quality than a resin-coated gravel pack cured in downhole. In an example, the prepack 720 includes a resin-coated proppant pack formed from ceramic proppant, for example, using the FUSION® technology from CARBO Ceramics. In another example, the prepack 720 is formed from metal spheres that have been sintered to form a single structure. The metal used to form the spheres may include stainless steel, aluminum, alloy selected for downhole use, and the like. The sintering of the metal spheres into a single structure may further decrease the possibility of erosion of the prepack screen 702. In some examples, an outer screen is not used when sintered metal spheres are used as the prepack 720.
In a similar fashion to gravel pack or frac pack completions, fracturing injection is considered possible through a prepack screen 702. However, the prepack 720, is more resistant to damage, staying in the wellbore annulus 724 by being restrained between the two screens 706 and 716, and being restrained by the strength of the resin-bonding. The prepack screens described herein are installed in solid-free fluid or in a carefully-conditioned mud to minimize plugging during installation.
The prepack 720 is not limited to discrete particles, or discrete particles formed into a single resin-coated structure. In examples, the prepack 720 is a porous structure made from a shape-memory material, such as a shape-memory polymer, a shape-memory metal, or a shape-memory alloy. In this example, the prepack 720 may be cooled and compressed for installation into a wellbore, and allowed to expand as the temperature of the prepack 720 increases from the higher temperature of the wellbore. The pre-expanded shape memory material of the prepack 720 may be mounted between two screens, such as the inner screen 716 and the outer screen 706.
In some examples, the prepack 720 is a fiber network placed between the inner screen 716 and the outer screen 706.
Further, in some examples the prepack 720 is an engineered porous structure, termed a digital prepack herein, which is made from a shape memory material, a polymer, a metal, or a metal alloy by 3D printing. In one example, the prepack 720 is a structure of face-centered spheres having about 26% porosity. The structure of the face centered spheres may be printed as a contiguous unit, in which each of the spheres are in contact with and formed as part of the adjacent spheres.
In another example, a reverse printing is done with the solids matrix approximating the pore space in a face-centered sphere pack, resulting in approximately 74% porosity. In this example, the pores are connected by a constricted area rather than a point contact. The 3D printing allows a reverse-engineering design of pore connectivity and pore tortuosity in a digital prepack or porous structure to balance the structure between sand retention and sand plugging for an injection well, as discussed further with respect to
In addition to the features above, the design may also include a number of combinations of check valves 726 on the basepipe, such as the Cascade3 check valve from Tendeka. The basepipe 704 may also include prepack 728 in the perforations of basepipe, such as Bonded Bead Matrix from Baker Hughes. The check valves 726 can be combined with inflow control devices.
The prepack screen 702 can be used in combinations with various completion options, including shunt tubes for gravel or frac packing, shunted annular packers, inflow control devices or valves, self-mitigating sand screens, multiple screen compartments, or hybrid sand control systems. The concept of multiple screen compartments, for example, as described with respect to
In some examples, the pipe joint includes a gravel reserve section near the box end and between a solid basepipe section and an outer housing. The gravel reserve section is communicated to the packing material. In low angle wells, e.g., within 60 degrees of being vertical, if the packing material volume is reduced between inner and outer screens, the upper gravel reserve will fill the gap between inner and outer screens. The reduction of packing material may be caused by change of screen openings or packing rearrangement during, e.g., installation. The gravel reserve is the same as or similar to the packing material.
In some examples, the shape memory material is made from a polymer, such as a shape memory foam formed from cross linked polyurethanes, which is expanded to form the final prepack. In other examples, a metal alloy, such as, Nitinol, which is an alloy of nickel and titanium, is used to form the shape memory material. The shape memory material is placed between the inner screen and outer screen, and is expanded either in factory or in downhole to full compliance, providing system integrity for water injection. In other examples, the 3D printed structure 800 used for the prepack is a rigid structure, for example, made from metal powders, such as stainless steel, aluminum, or other metals, or alloys.
As shown in
During shut-ins, the pore spaces 802, which provide a torturous path for flow 806, provide effective formation sand retention by selective opening shapes, along with the outer screen. After the injection flow is restored, the pore spaces 802 allow effective clean-up of any trapped solids through selective opening shapes and out of the 3D printed structure 800 and the outer screen.
In
At block 1004, the screen design and sizes may be selected. For example, an inverse-keystone design may be selected to allow easier clearance of sand bridges when injection is resumed. The size of the screens may be selected to allow easy flow of expected sand particles through the screens.
At block 1006, the packing may be designed for the screen. For example, the packing size may be selected to have flow channels that are equal in size to the openings in the screens, larger in size than the openings in the screens, or smaller in size than the openings in the screens. In an example described herein, the packing is selected to have flow channels that are larger than the screen channels.
At block 1008, the screens are placed on the tubing. This may be placed in a multistep manufacturing process, for example, with a first or inner screen placed over the openings in the tubing, followed by a second or outer screen. The space between the inner screen and outer screen is then filled with the packing. In some examples, the screen assembly, including the inner screen and the outer screen, with the packing between the screens, is first manufactured, then placed over the tubing.
At block 1010, the tubing is placed in the well. In an example, the tubing is used in an injection well to protect from sand infiltration during shut-ins. This protects the injection well from the loss of flow due to sand infiltration.
The systems and methods disclosed herein are applicable to the oil and gas industries.
It is believed that the disclosure set forth above encompasses multiple distinct inventions with independent utility. While each of these inventions has been disclosed in its preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and subcombinations of the various elements, features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein. Similarly, where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
It is believed that the following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations that are directed to one of the disclosed inventions and are novel and non-obvious. Inventions embodied in other combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such amended or new claims, whether they are directed to a different invention or directed to the same invention, whether different, broader, narrower, or equal in scope to the original claims, are also regarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of the present disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 62/853,917 filed May 29, 2019 entitled MATERIAL CONTROL TO PREVENT WELL PLUGGING, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62853917 | May 2019 | US |