Patent Grant
10082372
This invention relates generally to equipment utilized in the operation of indoor shooting ranges and, more particularly, to a ballistic resistant curtain system formed of an improved composite ballistic material.
Indoor shooting ranges typically have similar layouts to incorporate standard safety devices and systems, and slightly different from outdoor shooting ranges. Because of the enclosed space, indoor shooting ranges need to be concerned with lane divider safety, ricochet mitigation, and acoustic protection.
A typical indoor shooting range layout is depicted in
Primary safety systems incorporated throughout the walls, floor, ceiling and ricochet screen include ballistic protection. Such ballistic protection provides primary impact protection from fired rounds, as well as secondary impact protection to prevent hazardous stray or ricochet projectiles. This generally includes steel plates cladding the exposed surfaces and positioned throughout the range as baffle structures 30. The positioning, orientation, dimension and positioning of such metal baffles 30 are intended to provide protection against errant and/or ricochet projectiles.
While the use of metal baffles and cladding provide effective ballistic protection, they are heavy, unattractive, provide no or negative acoustic protection, and are difficult to install, replace or repair. Further, the use of metal baffles and cladding can facilitate a lead hazard associated with the continuous destruction of lead projectiles.
Various improvements are known that are useful for use with indoor shooting ranges. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,564,712, issued in the name of Werner, discloses a bullet trap for indoor shooting with small arms. The bullet trap is used behind targets, and includes a vertically suspended curtain made of rubber, and a vertically supported impact plate made of steel and being spaced behind the curtain. The space between the curtain and the impact plate is enclosed by cover plates extending forwards from the side, upper and lower margins of the impact plate. With the space between the impact plate and the curtain contained, the enclosed space is continuously evacuated by a fan and interconnected filter to prevent lead containing dust, which is set free upon the impact of the bullets in the bullet trap, from being distributed to the air and the shooting premises.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,526,861, issued in the name of Gruber, discloses a projectile stopping device for the purpose of damping the noise propagation linked to the striking of projectiles. Further, the braking of the projectiles, and their easier recovery, is facilitated by individual stopping curtains which are spaced apart from each other in the firing direction and suspended by steel cables. The stopping cables are received in receiving devices which are identically formed at the top and bottom, and are thereby connected to guides which are also formed in an identical manner to each other. The attachment of the stopping cables to these guides and their arrangement within a curtain are arranged in such a way that each stopping cable, when deflected, is always subject to a return force bringing it back into its original position. The projectiles striking the stopping curtains formed in this way within a firing field effect deflections of the steel cables both in the planes of the individual stopping curtains and also perpendicular thereto and can, after successful braking, be caught on the floor and sent for proper disposal.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,405,673, issued in the name of Seibert, discloses a shooting range backstop for firearm projectiles that includes a body of an ionomeric polymer disposed so as to slow and stop projectiles. The body of ionomeric material may comprise a plurality of spaced-apart sheets.
And, U.S. Pat. No. 3,815,520, issued in the name of Nikoden, discloses a shooting range ceiling protection device for a shooting range which includes a plurality of rectangular ceiling modules locked together at the sides and being suspended at the top and bottom edges. Each one of the modules has two positions for being hooked by a suspension chain. Normally only one chain is coupled to one of the hooks, leaving the other hook unused. When it is desired to remove and replace one of the modules due to excessive damage, the chain is merely unhooked from its normal position and connected to an adjacent hook means of another module. Once this is accomplished the module which is being replaced is free to be readily disconnected from the remaining ceiling structure. When the module is replaced, the chain is merely restored to its original position in the new module.
While many of these references may incorporated, reference or describe ballistic resistant elements which may be used in conjunction with or incorporated into this invention in combination, other elements are different enough as to make the combination distinguished over any of the prior art. Consequently, a need exists has been felt for providing improved ballistic resistant materials that mitigate the aforementioned drawbacks.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide improved equipment for use in the operation of indoor shooting ranges.
It is a feature of the present invention to provide a ballistic resistant curtain system formed of an improved composite ballistic material.
Briefly described according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a ballistic resistant curtain system is provided formed of a plurality of aligned ballistic material panels. Each ballistic material panel is formed of an improved composite ballistic material. Panels can be used to protect vertical surfaces, and can be reconfigured to provide coverages for horizontal or other oriented areas. Adjacent panels may be are aligned end to end in a butt or overlap manner, or configured to be angularly disposed toward the direction of fire such as to form a line of sight overlap. Each panel may be formed of composite materials which include high strength fibers made from materials such as extended chain ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. These composites display varying degrees of resistance to penetration by high speed impact from projectiles such as bullets, shells, shrapnel and the like. An exterior coating formed of fabric, polyurethane, or other material provides both an acoustic attenuation or sound absorbing surface as well as an aesthetic facing for providing an improved visual appearance to the area.
It is an advantage of the present invention to provide ballistic protection curtains that provide primary impact protection from fired rounds.
It is another advantage of the present invention to provide ballistic protection curtains that provide secondary impact protection to prevent hazardous stray or ricochet projectiles.
It is yet another advantage of the present invention to provide a replacement for steel plates, baffles or cladding in the protection of exposed surfaces throughout an indoor shooting range.
It is still yet another advantage of the present invention to provide acoustic attenuation within an indoor shooting range.
It is yet still other advantages of the present invention to provide a device and system that lighter than conventional solutions, can be made to include various colors or aesthetics, and are difficult to install, replace or repair.
Further, it is an advantage of the present invention to facilitate the mitigation of a lead hazard associated with the continuous destruction of lead projectiles.
These and other objects of the invention will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading the disclosure of the invention.
The advantages and features of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following more detailed description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like elements are identified with like symbols, and in which:
The best mode for carrying out the invention is presented in terms of its preferred embodiment, herein depicted within the Figures.
1. Detailed Description of the Figures
Referring now to the Figures, a ballistic resistant curtain system is provided, generally noted as 100, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The curtain system 100 is formed of a plurality of individual ballistic material panels 110 that are aligned such as to provide a surface having a generally contiguous line of sight covering for nonballistic surfaces. Each ballistic material panel 110 is formed of an improved composite ballistic material. The panels 110 may be of a variety of configurations, such as the larger panels 110 positioned abutted to or slightly overlaped with adjacent panels, as shown best in
As shown in reference to
Referring now in conjunction with
As further shown in conjunction with
Finally, as shown best in conjunction with
While such materials may be effective in conjunction with the system described herein, the current commercial price associated with such use may be prohibitive. As a result, it is a preferred aspect of the present invention that an otherwise amorphous plastic such as high density polyethylene (“HDPE”) be used having an unaligned, non-crystalline molecular structure that is modified such as to result in a planar sheet material having a targeted molecular alignment. These modified HDPE planar sheets are described in greater detail in the RELATED ART, which is incorporated by reference as if fully rewritten herein. By way of example, and not as a limitation, such HDPE may be chemically or mechanically modified such that the alignment of the fibers creates an anisotropic material that can be further utilized as molecularly oriented thin planar sheets 180 to replace or supplement the use of fibers in the manufacture of ballistic shielding. Among other advantages, the use of theses molecularly oriented planar sheets of material provide a tremendous economic advantage over otherwise existing ballistic materials and their methods of manufacture. The present materials and their use, as well as their methods of manufacture, allows the composite to achieve ballistic resistance at a much lower cost-to-strength ratio than with traditional ballistic composites typically found on the market.
Finally, it is intended that each panel 110 may further include an exterior coating 182. Applied or attached over the outer surface of the panel, the coating 182 may be formed of fabric, rubber, polyurethane, or other material that may provide both an acoustic attenuation or sound absorbing surface, as well as an aesthetic facing 150 for providing an improved visual appearance to the area.
2. Operation of the Preferred Embodiment
In operation, the present system 100 is used to configure a typical indoor shooting range layout, such as depicted in
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
The present invention is a Continuation in Part application of U.S. Ser. No. 14/701,326, filed on Apr. 30, 2015 and which was a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 13/219,920, filed on Aug. 29, 2011 and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,180,623, both of which are incorporated by reference as if fully rewritten herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4403012 | Harpell et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4457985 | Harpell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4566237 | Turner | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4613535 | Harpell et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4623574 | Harpell et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4650710 | Harpell et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4737402 | Harpell et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4748064 | Harpell et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 5257583 | Koenig | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5552208 | Lin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5587230 | Lin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5683781 | Komarek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5907930 | Ricco, Sr. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6007469 | Jaegers et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6642159 | Bhatnagar et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6841492 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846758 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 7415806 | Davidson | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7661228 | Nolte et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7762175 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7784232 | Nygren et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7921758 | Eden et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7964267 | Lyons | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 8544240 | Hughes, Jr. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 9115960 | Kim | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 20030159400 | Forrester | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20050086905 | Ralph et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20060248827 | Meeker | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070224401 | Telander | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO2015138025 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14701326 | Apr 2015 | US |
| Child | 15335216 | US | |
| Parent | 13219920 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Child | 14701326 | US |
