Patent Grant
8986798
The present invention generally relates to impact energy attenuation, and particularly to padding and cushioning systems intended to reduce trauma resulting from impacts to parts of the body, such as the head. Moreover, the present invention relates the general personal protection field, in general, which includes helmets, pads, armor, sports gear, clothing, worker safety equipment, packaging, vehicle interiors, barriers and pads for threat objects, and the like.
The present invention relates to a new and novel way to attenuate impact energy using loose particles contained in resilient structures while being arranged and customized to optimize such attenuation of energy.
For ease of discussion and illustration, the present invention will be illustrated and discussed in detail in connection with the field of personal protection, namely, helmets. This is just one example of the many applications of the present invention. It should be understood that this in no way intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
In the field of personal protection, protective gear for professional and recreational athletes, sport enthusiasts, military personnel and construction workers are well known in the art. There are many approaches to reducing impact energies transferred to the user during an impact. As can be well understood, protection of the head is of high concern due to the risk of head trauma and other serious injuries. Therefore, protection of the head is of critical importance.
In the prior art, helmets are well known to protect a users head from skull fractures and other such trauma. This was accomplished primarily by some type of rigid outer shell. Over time, padding was added to replace webbing based suspension systems. Although padding has improved, these prior art systems still have significant problems and suffer from many disadvantages. One typical shortcoming of prior art helmet protection systems is inadequate protection over a range of impact energies typically encountered in activities they were intended for. Another typical shortcoming of the prior art is their inability to significantly reduce rotational (off axis) impact energies. Another typical shortcoming of the prior art is their inability to consistently fit a large range of users head shapes and sizes. Another typical shortcoming of the prior art is using impact energy attenuation systems designed for adult helmet systems in children's and youth helmets.
There are many types of helmets provided in the prior art in an attempt to address the foregoing concerns and shortcomings in prior art helmet design. Contact sports such as American football, hockey and lacrosse have developed and refined helmet types suited to the play of those sports while decreasing head injuries. Similarly, climbing helmets, snow sports helmets motor sports helmets and bike helmets have evolved and are widely worn by recreational and professional users. A majority of these helmets employ a rigid or semi-rigid shell. It is understood in the art, that a hard shell protects the skull from fracture and distributes the impact energy over a larger area. Most bike helmets utilize expanded polystyrene material for their construction. This approach to the shell/padding allows for a light weight, affordable product.
In addition, most helmets have fit systems allowing the user to adjust the size of the helmet to better fit their head. Fit is known to have a large impact on the efficacy of any helmet system by maintaining coverage during a potential impact situation. Rigid shell systems are challenged to provide an optimal fit given the range of human head shapes and sizes. Many prior art helmets use pads of the same thickness throughout and typically result in either loose areas, tight areas or both when fitted to a users head. Helmets that use foam pad systems, for example, may have areas that fit tightly and since the foam in those areas is overly compressed, impact mitigation is compromised. Conversely, loose areas do not benefit from additional protection afforded by that dimension. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) bike helmets, for example, are rigid throughout where the shell and pad system are one and the same. As a result, they offer little or no ability to establish an optimal fit.
Still other systems include air bladders, which can be filled to occupy voids between the users head and the shell. Still other systems use variable length head bands that can be adjusted to fit the circumference of the users head. Variable length head bands leave potentially large voids between the band and the shell. User applied low durometer foam pads are also well know to adjust fit, but do little to attenuate impact energy.
In addition, most helmets employ a retention system to ensure the helmet stays properly aligned on the users head. These are typically webbing straps, sometimes including a cup or other interface for the users chin.
As indicated above, all of the forgoing issues also relate to any type of protective equipment and devices and not limited to those that are intended to protect the body. Therefore, the same issues are of concern outside of the field of the personal body protection, of which the present invention is also related and has applicability.
Referring specifically now to padding, there are many known systems, a number of which are discussed below. One common approach for padding in the prior art is the use of foam materials. Foam materials are based on a manufacturing process that creates an open matrix structure from a plastic compound. There are of two primary types, namely, open cell and closed cell. Open cell materials rely on the structure of the matrix and elastomeric qualities of the plastic material to provide a dampening effect to impact energies. Closed cell materials augment the inherent structure with air contained in the cells thus storing some of the impact energy by compressing the air. This stored energy in padding systems intended for helmets is generally not preferred because it can cause further trauma to the user. One disadvantage to these materials is their narrow band of responsiveness to the typical range of impact energies. Another disadvantage to these materials is their inability to provide an optimal fit for a wide range of user sizes.
In the current art, one approach to padding is rate sensitive materials, which are very well known. These materials use a range of chemical and/or mechanical means to increase the material's density as the force of impact increases. Under normal conditions these materials are soft, but stiffen when impacted to distribute and absorb impact energy. One disadvantage to these materials is their slow rate of return to normal once compressed which makes them less suitable to multi-impact applications.
Another approach to padding is mechanical materials. These materials combine the inherent energy diffusing qualities of plastic compounds with unique structures such as tubes, domes, channels, etc. One disadvantage to these materials is the narrow band of responsiveness to impact energies. Another disadvantage to these materials is the high degree of stored energy they deliver back through the system after an initial impact.
Another approach to padding is gel materials. These materials generally combine viscous liquids with solid particles and can range from loose to stiff. Like rate sensitive materials, one disadvantage to these materials is their slow rate of return to normal once compressed which makes them less suitable to multi-impact applications. Another disadvantage to these materials is their narrow band or responsiveness to the typical range of impact energies.
Another approach to padding is EPS, mentioned above, often found in bike helmets. These materials are lightweight amalgams of foamed polystyrene beads, which are typically molded into rigid or semi-rigid structures. Impact energy is diffused when the structure dis-integrates upon impact. One disadvantage to these materials is their reliance on dis-integration, which makes them unsuitable to multi-impact applications. Another disadvantage to these materials is the difficulty in knowing if they have been compromised or damaged.
Another approach to padding is expanded polypropylene (EPP). These materials are lightweight amalgams of foamed poly propylene beads, which are typically molded into semi-rigid structures. Impact energy is diffused similarly to a closed cell foam material. One disadvantage to these materials is their inherent capacity to store impact energy and return it to the user's head as a rebound impact.
Yet another approach to padding is the use of air. Two approaches are currently in use in the prior art. First is air contained within a closed system, either in static bags or coupled bags that allow for the air to be transferred from bag to bag. The other uses an orifice to control the rate air is expelled. One disadvantage to these systems is their slow rate of return to normal once compressed which makes them less suitable to multi impact applications.
Performance standards have been developed for some helmet types and other body protective equipment. Bicycle helmets, for example, are subject to US CSPC testing standards. Football helmets are subject to NOCSAE testing standards. Hockey helmets are subject to ASTM testing standards. These test standards have helped to ensure that the protective equipment meets minimum requirements for performance under specified input criteria and testing criteria regardless of brand or cost. While virtually all helmets commercially available pass their respective tests, user injuries with different mechanisms of injury persist across the board. Within the sports category, this may be due in part to participants' average size and weight increasing coupled with a drive to push themselves harder to be more competitive. Recent news coverage of the increase in concussive injuries in American football has raised the question whether current test standards are appropriate for that particular injury. Medical science is discovering new links between brain injuries and trauma mechanisms that are helping to inform better protection, and eventually improved testing standards.
Regardless of application, users are demanding lighter and lower profile helmets with more and more energy attenuation. Added weight creates fatigue in the user, but is also known to increase inertia to the head in collisions. Helmet wearers generally and young sport enthusiasts in particular resist high profile solutions for aesthetic reasons.
In view of the foregoing, there is a demand for a new and novel impact energy attenuation material.
There is a demand for an impact energy attenuation material that is more responsive than prior art materials.
There is a further demand for a new and novel system that can provide impact energy attenuation.
There is a further demand for a system that can provide a custom fit of such a system for optimal performance thereof.
The present invention preserves the advantages of prior art impact energy attenuation materials and systems related thereto. In addition, it provides new advantages not found in currently available materials and systems and overcomes many disadvantages of such currently available materials and systems.
The invention is generally directed to the novel and unique impact energy attenuation material, module therefor including a container and fit system for optimizing the performance thereof.
First, the present invention includes a non-linear energy attenuating material consisting of a plurality of loose particles. The invention provides an interaction between loose particles and the resultant impact energy dissipation. Like a ball thrown into a bean bag chair the loose particle material of this invention translates impact energy into heat through friction in a highly non-linear distribution. In a preferred embodiment, the loose particles are preferably approximately (0.1-3 mm) diameter spherical elastomeric balls. One benefit of an elastomeric material is a high coefficient of friction between the loose particles, which increases the effective energy attenuation. Another benefit of an elastomeric material is under peak load conditions (“bottoming out”), the loose particles themselves will inherently continue to diffuse impact energy.
Second, the present invention also provides an impact energy attenuation module that includes a container for the foregoing material of loose particles. This module is preferably deformable. The use of the impact energy attenuation module of the present invention enables a number of desirable outcomes to be achieved.
For example, it has been found that, starting from a spherical volume, which is neutral and symmetrical, the energy from an impact could be directed along an axis by altering the shape of the container. In the preferred embodiments of the present invention, these energy focusing shapes are preferably triangular or diamond shaped in cross section, however, it should be understood that other shapes can also be used to guide impact energy into a relatively large “pool” of impact energy attenuating material. By enclosing the loose particle material in a volume with such an energy focusing shape, the material's energy dissipation qualities are increased. As will described in detail below, a torus shaped configuration is particularly well-suited for the energy attenuation characteristics of the module of the present invention.
In one embodiment of the module, suited for use with a rigid shell or liner in an example of a helmet head protection device, the shape of the module is a preferably a hollow torus. A cross-section through the torus shows that it is wider at one end than the other or roughly triangular. This module would orient with the wider side facing towards the expected impact and the narrow side facing the head. This orientation provides a relatively large “pool” of impact dissipating material to absorb impact energy proximal to the shell. The small contact surface at the head allows relatively uninhibited flexure of the torus shape, allowing for the diffusion of rotational or off axis impacts. This small surface is also useful to create maximum air circulation/ventilation when the application is a helmet. It is possible that this torus configuration may be inverted or altered to better suit the environment and purpose of the impact energy dissipation at hand.
As part of the module, the container for the impact energy attenuating material can be made from any of a range of elastomeric polymers or other materials capable of sustaining multiple high energy impacts without failure across a range of environmental conditions. This impact energy attenuation and simultaneous rotational movement of the overall module structure gives the present invention a unique functionality to decrease the displacement, velocity and acceleration of the head in both linear and off axis impacts.
Further, the container for the material, including loose particles, provides a module that provides a degree of memory, returning the loose particles to their original or neutral state quickly after an initial impact thereby enabling the system for further impacts. The pad of the present invention can reset itself in a time period of approximately 50 milliseconds to approximately 5 seconds. This memory stores very little inertial energy thereby avoiding any negative effects associated with “spring back” of the module.
The efficacy of the impact dissipation material is partially dependent on the container portion of the module, which holds the material. Both the shape of the container and the material used for the container affect the overall system performance. How tightly the material is compressed in the container will also affect system performance and can be tuned to the particular application at hand. As can be understood, higher pressures applied to the loose particle compound by the container (either through overfilling or evacuation of air), slows the movement between particles during an impact, effectively hardening the material to mitigate higher impact forces. Lower pressures result in a softer material and mitigate lower impact forces.
Another feature of the present invention is to provide an optimal fit to the environment at hand. For example, in the example environment of a body protection helmet device, there is a need to custom fit that device the individual's head shape and size. The fit of a helmet relative to the head is understood in the field to reduce the severity of energy translated through the system, but is difficult to achieve using conventional means. For example, the range of head shapes and sizes when considering the fit of a helmet cannot be consistently fit using a single thickness of foam or a single size of pad. To ensure maximum energy dissipation, each pad installed in the system should preferably be partially compressed by height when fitted to the users head.
Still further, the present invention provides easily exchangeable modules to allow the user to replace damaged modules, increase or decrease the density of any module in the system, and or re-fit the helmet.
Also, the present invention provides the dissipation of impact energy from any angle of incidence. By enclosing the loose particle material in a container with a relatively small attachment member to a rigid shell or liner, the container is free to move or smear in line with the force, and thus not transfer those forces to the users head.
The present invention also provides dissipation of impact energies from multiple impacts. By enclosing the loose particle material in a container made from a resilient material with some degree of memory to form the impact energy attenuation module, the loose particles of the material is quickly reset after an initial impact and thus prepared for further impacts.
The present invention also dissipates equal impact energy in less volume compared to prior art materials
Therefore, it is the object of this invention to provide a new and novel impact energy attenuation material.
An object of the present invention is to provide a material with an increased range of impact energy attenuation.
It is further the object of this invention to provide a material, module and system that can attenuate impact energy regardless of incidence angle of the impact.
It is further the object of this invention to provide a highly responsive system that can quickly reset in anticipation of multiple impacts.
It is further the object of this invention to provide a method for distributing impact energy attenuation within body protective equipment.
It is further the object of this invention to provide a method for distributing impact energy attenuation within a module that is inserted into body protective equipment.
It is further the object of this invention to provide a method for distributing impact energy attenuation within a helmet liner or helmet shell.
It is yet a further the object of this invention to ensure an optimal fit of body protective equipment.
The novel features which are characteristic of the present invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the invention's preferred embodiments, together with further objects and attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
a is a perspective representational view of the interaction of the particles of the present invention;
b shows example stages of attenuation of impact energy achieved by the particles of
a-f illustrate a number of prior art helmet configurations;
a-h illustrate containers of differing heights and widths that can be used in a impact energy attenuation module in accordance with the present invention to hold particles of the present invention;
a-d illustrate different angles of impact possible to the head;
a-d is a perspective view of the centered three-piece impact energy attenuation module in different levels of load;
a-e show the impact energy attenuation module of
a-e is a perspective view of the off center three-piece impact energy attenuation module in different levels of load;
a-d are perspective view of the matrix array of impact energy attenuation modules on an helmet;
a-b illustrate a front perspective and side view of a helmet with centered impact energy attenuation modules installed thereon;
a-b illustrate a front perspective and side view of a helmet with off center impact energy attenuation modules installed thereon;
a-c illustrate heads of different sizes;
a-c illustrates heads of different shapes;
a-d illustrates a matrix array of preferred contact points; and
a-d illustrates the present invention used as both a compression and tension force dissipator.
Turning first to
The characteristics and performance of the impact energy attenuation material 10 is best described in connection with its use in an actual application. For example, the material 10 may be used for a number of applications, such as body protection, in the form of a helmet to replace the conventional prior art constructions seen in
Referring back to the present invention, as in
As can be seen in
Turning now to
It should be noted that when used without a rigid outer shell 34, the impact dissipation material 10 with particles 12 may be encapsulated by a container 37 or containers 37 and held against the object to be protected or the threat object, such as a ski lift pole, steering wheel, and the like, by any number of conventional means, including fasteners, straps, hook and loop material, or integrated into an article of clothing or equipment, and the like. As when used with a shell 34, an equal positive pressure on the object to be protected should be achieved, although this is not required.
The inertial energy associated with a linear impact compresses the material 10 of particles 12, as can be seen by the arrows in
In contrast, during impacts that are primarily rotational, shear or “off axis” to the object to be protected, the impact dissipation material 10 reduces the likelihood of damage by freely shifting under the force, thus preventing that energy from entering the system. Such a condition can be seen in
Another example of a rigid shell and pad configuration is shown in
Therefore, the impact energy attenuation modules 36 of different sizes and configurations of the present invention can be customized to achieve the proper fit of irregular objects within a rigid shell. As seen in
When used without a rigid outer shell 34, the impact dissipation material 10 may be encapsulated by a container 37 or containers 37 and held against the object to be protected or the threat object by any number of conventional means (fasteners, straps, hook and loop material, or integrated into an article of clothing or equipment, etc.) As when used with a shell 34, an equal positive pressure on the object to be protected should be achieved.
The size, shapes and configurations of the impact energy attenuation modules 36 and their respective containers 37 can be modified in any way to suit the application at hand. While a torus shape is preferred, any shape may be used and still be within the scope of the present invention. Also, a range of sizes of containers 37, such as varying in height and width, can be employed, as seen in
Turning now to
c and 18d illustrate an “off axis” or “rotational” impact trajectory 50. During these impacts that are primarily rotational, shear or off axis to the object to be protected, the impact energy attenuation module 36 reduces the likelihood of damage by freely deforming under the force, preventing a portion of that energy from entering the system. This load spreading from a rotation impact trajectory can be seen in
When implemented within a helmet, the nature of head shapes and sizes requires that the helmet be fitted to achieve maximum performance. In one embodiment, a fitter trained in the fitting process undertakes the customization of the shell to fit its user. A wide range of shells appropriate to many activities, such as cycling, contact sports, construction, and the like, will be available in sizes to fit most user's heads. A fitter trained in the fitting process will not only ensure compliance with safety standards, but adds value in the way of service. This process may occur in a specialty retail shop or in an institution where the staff can be trained. The fitting process may utilize a device that quickly determines the optimal location and pad sizes for a particular user's head. The fitter then installs the correct pads in the chosen shell and confirms the fit on the users head.
In another embodiment, a range of the sizes of the impact energy attenuation module 36 may be included with the shell 34 with instructions for the user to fit the helmet without assistance.
For applications where the space between the shell 34 and the object to be protected 20 is more consistent, a pre-determined set of impact energy attenuation modules 36 are preferably installed by an appropriate method.
For applications where no shell 34 will be used, impact energy attenuation modules 36 are preferably selected based on the likely impact forces to be encountered.
The impact energy attenuation module 36 may also be modified, in accordance with the present invention to include a three-piece configuration 52 for even further improved impact energy attenuation. Referring to
Residing between the base member 56 and the spherical container 54 is a preferably torus-shaped element 62, which preferably is of a molded foam, such as EPS, EPP or any of the many foam materials known in the art. The torus-shaped element 62 is also preferably permanently attached to the base 56, such as by gluing, overmolding or any other method of affixation. This inner surface 62a of the torus-shaped element 62 faces toward and is adjacent to the spherical container 54 with loose particles 12 therein. Its shape is configured to enhance the energy focusing aspect of the spherical container 54 with loose particles 12, further directing impact energy.
A non-centered or offset version 64 of the three-piece impact energy attenuation module is shown in
Depending on the distribution of the matrix within the shell or liner 34, any impact energy attenuation module 64 may align with a high point on the users head 20 (not shown in
In this preferred embodiment, when installed in a rigid helmet shell or liner (see helmet assembly of
In lower energy impacts, the loose particle container 54, 66 is engaged then immediately returns to its original shape and position. In higher energy impacts, the loose particle container 54, 66 is initially engaged through its peak capacity. Upon bottoming out, the impact energy then engages the torus shaped foam module 62, 68, which in this preferred embodiment has a higher threshold of energy attenuation. With sufficient impact energy, the inherent attenuation qualities of the loose particles 12 of the material 10 as well as the reverse camber of the base module 56, 70 are engaged as well.
Another important aspect of the present invention is the ability to fine tune the performance characteristics and fit of an impact system. In that connection, the invention enables individual impact energy attenuation modules in an impact system to be adjusted to align with the anatomy of the user. Thus, the invention enables any single impact energy attenuation module in the system to dissipate impact energy both in tension and compression.
When implemented in a helmet, such as in the form of a shell 34 as in
First, a rigid shell type is selected based on the intended use—for example, bicycle, football, baseball, hockey, and the like, then a particular style within that type and finally a size suited to the users head size, as see in
Once a shell 34 is selected, impact energy attenuation modules 36, 52 and/or 64, as seen in
To further ensure the system is suited to the intended use, impact energy attenuation modules of a particular density and surface area are selected based on risk factors such as weight of user, likely velocities, and types of impacts. Larger area and higher density impact energy attenuation modules are selected for heavier users with higher risk factors and smaller, lower density impact energy attenuation modules are selected to lighter users with lower risk factors.
A final aspect of fit involves aligning impact energy attenuation modules with specific anatomic structures of the users skull 20 to direct the flow of impact energy into inherently stronger and less vulnerable areas of the users body. As in
To adjust the fit of a helmet, namely a shell 34, to the users head 20, the fitter further refines the impact energy attenuation module selection to ensure that each impact energy attenuation module in the system is evenly loaded or partially compressed against the users head 20 once installed in the shell 34. The space between the users head 20 and the inside of the shell 34 is used to determine each impact energy attenuation module's thickness. The effect of this fitting will ensure a comfortable, safe helmet.
The fitting process may utilize a specialized device that quickly determines the optimal location and impact energy attenuation module sizes for a particular user's head 20. The fitting process may utilize a specialized computer program to compile the collected data from the user to suggest specific impact energy attenuation modules for optimal fit.
Once the impact energy attenuation modules are selected, the impact energy attenuation modules are inserted into the chosen shell 34 to align with the users cranial structure. Any impact energy transmitted through the system to the users heads 20 should follow a path that reduces the potential for injury.
When used without a rigid outer shell 34, the impact energy attenuation modules will be held against the object to be protected or the threat object by any number of conventional means, such as by fasteners, straps, hook and loop material, or integrated into an article of clothing or equipment, and the like.
The embodiment of
It would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
This application is divisional continuation of non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 12/946,811, filed on Nov. 15, 2010, which is related to and claims priority from earlier filed provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/261,544, filed Nov. 16, 2009; provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/261,568, filed Nov. 16, 2009, provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/261,613, filed Nov. 16, 2009 the entire contents of each of the foregoing are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3459179 | Olesen | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3552044 | Wiele | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3574379 | Jordan | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3610609 | Sobel | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3782768 | Moore | Jan 1974 | A |
| 4023213 | Rovani | May 1977 | A |
| 4038762 | Swan, Jr. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4148505 | Jensen et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4229546 | Swan, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4307471 | Lovell | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4342157 | Gilbert | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4343047 | Lazowski et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4354284 | Gooding | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4817304 | Parker et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 5053436 | Delgado | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5079787 | Pollmann | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5141279 | Weller | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5330249 | Weber et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5421874 | Pearce | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5456072 | Stern | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5508334 | Chen | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5549743 | Pearce | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5590430 | Sereboff | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5592706 | Pearce | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5689845 | Sobieralski | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5790988 | Guadagnino, Jr. et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5815846 | Calonge | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5921004 | Lyden | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5956777 | Popovich | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6153698 | Kanno et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154889 | Moore, III et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6197099 | Pearce | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6226801 | Alexander et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6226896 | Friton | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6282724 | Abraham et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292954 | O'Bradaigh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6324700 | McDougall | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336220 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347790 | Nishibori et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357054 | Bainbridge et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6425141 | Ewing et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6438763 | Guay et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6446270 | Durr | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453476 | Moore, III | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453477 | Bainbridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| D465067 | Ide et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
| 6481024 | Grant | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485446 | Brother et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487796 | Avar et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6509385 | Sereboff | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6532602 | Watters et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6552109 | Chen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560787 | Mendoza | May 2003 | B2 |
| D475486 | Ide et al. | Jun 2003 | S |
| 6583199 | Brother et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6604246 | Obreja | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6658671 | Von Holst et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6756426 | Brother et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| D492818 | Ide et al. | Jul 2004 | S |
| 6802307 | Leven | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6826852 | Fusco | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6854133 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6857151 | Jusiak et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6931671 | Skiba | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6934971 | Ide et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6996856 | Puchalski | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7033666 | Skaja | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7056564 | Sereboff | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7062795 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7089602 | Talluri | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096512 | Blair | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7131218 | Schindler | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7240376 | Ide et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7254843 | Talluri | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7284469 | Raichel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7299505 | Dennis et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7314125 | Smaldone et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7328462 | Straus | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7341776 | Milliren et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7373678 | Hetzel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7386946 | Goodwin | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7448522 | Collier et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7458172 | Aveni | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7591919 | Schindler et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7685742 | Aveni et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685743 | Swigart et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7694439 | White et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7730635 | Aveni et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7757410 | Aveni et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7762432 | Fidrych et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7798298 | Smaldone et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 20020152541 | Halstead et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030200609 | Jusiak et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040025229 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050166302 | Dennis | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060137073 | Crisco | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070083965 | Darnell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20090175499 | Rosenblatt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2427249 | Feb 2010 | GB |
| 2470180 | Nov 2010 | GB |
| 9725551 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 9949236 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0111999 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| 0221013 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Davies, K. et al., Pedestrian Protection Using a Shock Absorbing Liquid (SALi) Based Bumper System, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Jun. 14-18, 2009 International Congress Center, Stuttgart, Germany Paper No. 09-0027. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130313765 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61261544 | Nov 2009 | US | |
| 61261568 | Nov 2009 | US | |
| 61261613 | Nov 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12946811 | Nov 2010 | US |
| Child | 13959113 | US |
