1. Field of Invention
This invention generally relates to thermoformed apparatus and more particularly to a polymeric pallet or container having a communications device.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The 48 inch by 40 inch wood pallet is an integral part of North America's distribution system, and is involved in one way or another in the movement of a significant proportion of all goods bought and sold. According to Material Handling Engineering, (October 1999), page 16, the U.S. Forest Service estimates there are 1.9 billion wooden pallets in America. Approximately 400 million new pallets are needed each year. 175 million of these are pallets repaired for reuse by industry. Therefore, roughly 225 million new wooden pallets enter the supply chain each year. The standard 48 inch by 40 inch wood pallet makes up a significant proportion of the total number of wood pallets within the over-all distribution system.
U.S. Forest Service researchers also found that 225 million wooden pallets are sent to landfills each year. According to CHEP Equipment Pooling Systems, the largest third party pallet leasing company with 94 million wooden pallets, the average 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet weighs between 28 pounds and 65 pound at time of manufacture (dry). These traditional wooden pallets range from 48 pounds to 110 pounds in weight (wet) at time of recycling or disposal. Using these figures, approximately 17.8 billion pounds of wood is deposited in landfills each year. APA, the Engineered Wood Association, estimates that a standard 48 inch by 40 inch style lumber stringer pallet has a three year life. The three year cost for this style of wooden pallet is estimated to be $11.74. A three year life is based on 15-24 trips per year. Conventional wooden pallets have limited residual value at the end of their useful life cycle.
According to the Grocery Manufacturers of America (hereinafter “GMA”), the largest end-user of traditional 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallets within the North American distribution system, the current wooden pallet exchange system costs the industry nearly $2 billion to operate in 1991. For example, the trucking industry is unable to optimize semi trailer loading or per-unit transportation costs because GMA style pallets are not capable of true four-way entry. Drivers are required to exchange loaded pallets for empty pallets after delivery, and because of manual pallet handling injuries, workers compensation claims are significant. Grocery distributors are unable to use automated material handling equipment efficiently because unacceptable wooden pallets must be removed from the pallet supply chain. Grocery manufacturers and shippers experience product damage because of design flaws in traditional wooden pallets. Furthermore, unit loading is not evenly distributed with stringer pallet designs, which results in product and packaging damaged in transport. Manufacturers must use stronger and costlier packaging because of wooden pallet problems. Wooden pallet sanitation and moisture absorption difficulties affect meat and other food processors. Moreover, general pallet deterioration, manifested by protruding nails and staples, splintered wood and missing stringers, results in significant inefficiencies within the over-all distribution system.
More and more companies are finding it preferable to employ third-party pallet management services to control the costs and logistics of using wooden pallets. For example, some fruit growers require pallets on a seasonal basis. Wooden pallets may therefore be rented for short or long terms from third parties. Third party service companies offer nationwide access to pools of wooden pallets, have responsibility for collecting and redeploying pallets where they are needed, and keep the pallet pool at a relatively high level of quality to move product through the distribution channel. The pallet tracking and retrieval systems deployed by the third party providers are more elaborate and efficient than other segments within the wooden pallet market. For example, bar code labels have been used to manage the efficiency of conventional pallet assets. A direct line of sight is, however, required by the scanner to read a bar card label. The performance of these systems has been generally unreliable and costly to implement within a wooden pallet environment.
Conventional Radio Frequency Identification (hereinafter “RFID”) systems have also been used but without success for a number of reasons. For instance, there are too many makes and models of 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet in the market. Also, a standard protocol has not been advanced. Furthermore, pallet handling procedures, material deterioration, product damage and repair practices require a more robust RFID tag technology than is currently available and wood is not a stable platform for the attachment of many types of RFID tags. Additionally, radio frequencies are absorbed by moisture in wood, which makes tag reads unreliable. Standard harsh operating conditions within the wooden pallet distribution system, such as thermal shock, sanitation, flexure, vibration, compressive forces, and fork impacts, can cause tag transponder coils to break and fail.
The velocity at which 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallets travel through the distribution system is far less than optimum because a significant proportion of wooden pallets are not suitable for transporting goods, damage free. Although 175 million pallets are repaired each year, industry observers claim as many as 70% of all wooden pallets have deteriorated from their original specifications. Unacceptable wooden pallets have to be separated from acceptable wooden pallets, which is time consuming, injurious and wasteful. Accordingly, a far larger pool of wooden pallets is maintained in operation than would otherwise be required under optimum conditions. The traditional 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet is therefore tremendously inefficient, costing industry billions of dollars annually. Wooden pallets also have considerable negative societal and environmental impacts because the recourses used to purchase, repair and dispose wooden pallets could be more effectively deployed in other less costly product technology alternatives.
Accordingly, plastic pallets have been used to replace wood pallets with some degree of success over the past several years. Plastic pallets are known for their longevity and are generally more durable, lighter weight, compatible with automated material handling equipment, easily sanitized and 100 percent recyclable. Conventional plastic pallets, however, suffer from one significant disadvantage in that they cost considerably more than a comparable wooden pallet. Thermoplastic materials constitute a significant proportion of the total cost of a plastic pallet, and a given amount of relatively expensive plastic material is required to produce a pallet with a measure of load-bearing strength that is comparable to wooden pallets.
As another example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,569 which issued to Mish et al. proposes applying a pressure sensitive tape to the backside of a tag carrier and affixing the carrier to an object. Generally speaking, however, exterior attachment methodologies are not sufficiently robust and durable. Tags affixed to the exterior of the pallet can be damaged through wear and tear, sanitation, forklift impacts, and the like. Also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,527 which issued to Isaacman, et al., proposes a “cell” comprising a host transceiver and several local hard lined interrogators that detect local tags. In the Isaacman arrangement, several cells can be networked, which allows any tagged object to be identified from any PC within a multi-cell network.
It is significant that plastic pallet suppliers has been unable to physically identify, locate and track, in real time, comparatively expensive plastic pallets within networks of distribution. It is one thing to lose a low cost wooden pallet, but it is another to loose an expensive asset. Different technologies have been proposed to attempt tracking of pallet assets within the distribution system, but these proposals have been incomplete with respect to system architectures, protocols and plastic pallet design intent. Barcodes have been used, but these require a direct line of sight and have therefore been difficult to implement. RFID tags have been placed upon traditional molded pallets to locate and track their positions within the distribution system, but this type of pallet is so much more expensive than a comparable wooden pallet that the cost justification for implementation is not economical.
Moreover, it is known that conditions within the operating environment affect the performance of the RFID system. Several U.S. patents disclose protocols, circuitry architectures and other enabling methods for ensuring the interrogator properly communicates with one or more tags within an interrogation zone; these include: U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,648 which issued to Shindley et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,479,416 which issued to Snodgrass et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,539,775 which issued to Tuttle et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,819 which issued to Roesner et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,818,348 which issued to Walezak et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,714 which issued to Cato; U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,779 which issued to MacLellen et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,942,987 which issued to Heinrich et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,950 which issued to Gallagher et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,144 which issued to Kruest and U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,570 which issued to Black et al. Still other proposals are offered to overcome the antenna-to-antenna communication difficulties conventionally experienced by tag carriers, such as pallets, as they travel through interrogation fields or portals. The rapidly changing angular geometry of a tag passing through a field or portal results in a diminishing duration and strength of signal transmission, which can produce unreliable tag reading results. The following U.S. Patents Nos. propose solutions to this particular problem: U.S. Pat. No. 5,661,457 which issued to Ghaffari et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,708,423 which issued to Ghaffari et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,928 which issued to Pritchett et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,995,898 which issued to Tuttle; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,091 which issued to Wortham.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided an apparatus for manufacturing extruded plastic sheet having RF devices that includes a local computer linked to a network. A sheet extruder has a first PLC linked to the local computer. An RF device applicator is spaced apart from the extruder and has a second PLC linked to the local computer. The local computer communicates with the network and the second PLC causes the applicator to selectively fix the RF device upon the extruded plastic sheet.
Further in accordance with the present invention there is provided an apparatus for a fixing RF devices to extruded sheet used in the manufacture of thermoformed articles that includes an extruder for providing the sheet. A gantry is spaced apart from the extruder and includes an inventory of RF devices. A press moves the RF devices in a fixed position upon the sheet. A PLC is linked to a computer in the network for controlling the operation of the press.
Additionally the present invention is directed to an apparatus for fixing RF devices to extruded sheet that includes an extruder to produce the sheet with the RF devices positioned thereon. A frame is provided comprising a roll of film and a roller. The roller compresses the film onto the sheet with the RF devices affixed therebetween.
Further the present invention is directed to a method for communicating information associated with extruded sheet from a network to a machine that subsequently modifies the sheet and includes the steps of providing a first apparatus to extrude the sheet. A second apparatus is spaced apart from the first apparatus to affix a RF device to the sheet. A third apparatus is spaced from the second apparatus to at least receive information from the RF device on the sheet and the received information being used by a machine PLC to configure a processing characteristic of the machine for subsequently modifying the sheet.
Further the present invention is directed to a thermoforming apparatus that includes a computer linked to a network. A first read/write module is linked to the computer with a first read/write module reading data stored in a RF device affixed to an extruded sheet. A first PLC is connected to the computer to receive the RF device data from the first module and to configure an operational characteristic of the apparatus based upon the received data. A controllable oven heats the sheet. A controllable platen with a controllable mold is attached thereto to controllably form the heated sheet into an article. A second read/write module is linked to the computer for writing data to the RF device affixed to the article. The written data is subsequently used to identify the article within the network.
Further in accordance with the present invention there is provided a system that includes a manufacturing machine, a receiver, and an electrical control system connected to the machine and the receiver. An extruded sheet with at least one data storage device is affixed thereto with the sheet being manufactured by the machine into an article. The receiver operably interfaces with the data storage device to ascertain data previously stored on the device and the control system changing manufacturing characteristics of the machine based upon data received from the device.
Further the present invention is directed to a system that includes a manufacturing machine. An extruded sheet with at least one data storage device fixed thereto with the sheet is manufactured by the machine into an article. A transceiver is linked to a network and operable to send new data to the affixed data device after being manufactured by the machine.
Referring to
The RFID system is minimally composed of three components including an interrogator (reader or exciter), tag devises 16, and a host computer. The tag is alerted by a radio frequency wave transmitted by the interrogator to return a data message by arrangement. The information stored in memory is thus transmitted back to the interrogator. Information received by an interrogator is used by a host computer to provide a reliable and a secure architecture that meets predetermined performance requirements. In passive RFID systems, the RF field generates voltage that is rectified to power the tag. In active RFID systems, a battery is the source of a tag's power supply. Both passive and active RFID devises may be embedded within the structure of the preferred plastic pallet.
Radio frequency identification tags and interrogators can be made in accordance with the following U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,027 entitled “Luggage Tag Assembly” which issued to Smithgall on Feb. 22, 2000 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,949 entitled “Miniature Radio Frequency Transceiver” which issued to Tuttle on Jan. 11, 2000. Both of these patents are incorporated by reference herein.
RFID device 16 is encapsulated between the sheets forming pallet 4. In general, thermoplastic resins are extruded through a machine that produces a selective sheet or web of heat deformable plastic. As the preformed sheet or web travels through the extruder, one or more surfaces of the sheet receives one or more RFID tags. This may be done automatically or manually such that the tag is located on the plastic according to predetermined criteria corresponding to a select molding position upon the thermoforming tooling. Sheet thus tagged moves through a thermoforming machine that molds said sheet into a finished pallet. The tag or tags are sandwiched between the sheets of plastic forming the pallet at predetermined locations. In this manner, the tag is embedded, isolated, protected and contained in a fluid tight plastic barrier that is resilient and long lasting and not externally, physically visible. In order to ensure the RFID device is not damaged in the thermoforming process of preference, a high temperature RFID devise methodology, such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,599 which issued to Nicholson et al., may be used; this patent is also incorporated by reference herein. The location of the device within the pallet is selected for system requirements. A plurality of locations can be used by cross-referencing machine and extrusion direction dimension references upon the plastic sheet with their counter part locations upon the properly thermoformed article. Thus, through such registration techniques, a consistent location for positioning the tag upon the sheet relative to its selected location in the finished part can be repeated with a high degree of certainty. In more detail, molded-in structures of the plastic pallet may be adapted to further protect the RFID device from flexural and compressive forces that may other wise damage the device.
The RFID devise 16 is part of a system in which data about the pallet 2 is stored for retrieval according to system criteria. The advantage of encapsulating RFID devise 16 within the structure a pallet 4 is so that the devise 16 is protected from the harsh environment that pallet 4 must operate within.
There are a number of methods that can be used to insert a RFID devise 16 within thermoformed pallet 4. In one embodiment, RFID devise 16 is a passive RFID tag 18. An example of such a passive tag 18 is shown in
A plastic sheet is heated to a deformable temperature before it is molded by differential vacuum pressure over a mold. Intervention is required to integrate the tag 18 into the present thermoforming process in order to minimize stretching and heat deformation of the PET substrate. As shown in
This arrangement produces a tag construction that is resistant to deformation under the short-term and high heat environment of the thermoforming process. Substrate 32 of tag 18 will not significantly stretch as the attached sheet 62 is deformed over a three dimensional molding surface. Moments of shear at the location of the tag 18 will also be deflected through movement of the adhesive film 36a. Adhesive 30 will deflect compression upon the memory chip by providing a compression buffer (thickness) equal to the elevation of the memory chip 24. In this manner, the tag 18 is developed to sustain the rigors of thermoforming.
Another alternate variation of the communications device in the structure of the pallet provides a power supply, an antenna, a radio frequency transmitter, a radio frequency receiver, a digital signal processor, a pallet information memory chip set, a pallet identification reader card, and circuitry. The memory chip set controls the function of the communicator and the identification reader card identifies the communicator and pallet. The communications device will thereby remotely communicate with an external interrogator in a wireless manner, such as by cellular telephone types of transmissions. This is used to instruct the interrogator to then query tags on or in the pallet or container. The interrogator also includes a power supply, an antenna, a radio frequency transmitter, a radio frequency receiver, a data processing micro-controller and circuitry.
Referring to
Referring to
In the preferred order of arrangement shown in
One of the tags 18, in this example tag 18a, interfaces with a Manufacturing Management System (hereinafter “MMS”) deployed throughout the overall manufacturing infrastructure. Sheets 62, 68 and 70 (in the triple sheet method) are conveyed to a thermoforming machine RF interrogator field 72, where a RFID tag interrogator 74 identifies and reads data stored on tags 18a. Tags 18a send preprogrammed data packages back to interrogator 74a. Interrogator 74a interfaces with LAN PC 76 connected to thermoforming machine PLC 78 interfacing through LAN to MMS host computer 80. PLC 78 instructs machine and ancillary equipment how to process the plastic sheets 62, 68 and/or 70. PLC 76 next instructs tooling 77 how to process the plastic sheets 62, 68 and/or 70. If MMS criteria are not met, the thermoforming process is disabled. If MMS criteria are met, tag 18a traverses an interrogator field 82 and tag 18a writes and locks final data into non-volatile tag 18a memory before the pallet 4 exits said field to enter the supply chain. Other tags 18b, 18c, 18d and 18e do not interface with interrogator fields 72 and 82.
Referring now to
In triple sheet constructions, other pallet strengthening techniques can be used to increase the survivability of devices 16 within chamber 88. Sheets 62, 68 and 70 are formed to substantially position chamber 88 between the top load-bearing surface 98 and the bottom tine contacting surface 100 of pallet 4 so that the devices 16 are isolated from damaging events within the core of the pallet 4. This arrangement is illustrated in
As understood in reference to
System interference may also occur if a nearby devises 16 travels outside the interrogation zone 102 but through the interrogator's signal pattern 112. Similarly, as the pallet 4 is traveling through the WMS, devise 16 may excite other interrogators coming within reader range. These occurrences may lead to unreliable data. In order to minimize these and other potential problems, it is preferred to encapsulate devises 16 along a center axis 114 of pallet 4. This is shown in
Referring to
It may also be understood in connection with
In the present invention, a pallet and corresponding load of tagged objects, or stack of pallets, is positioned within the interrogation zone by a manually operated motorized pallet transporting vehicle. The interrogation field detects the vehicle within the zone by a triggering devise. The interrogator communicates with the tags in the zone, and upon completion of this task, communicates with a visual message delivery devise that is operative to instruct the driver to exit the interrogation field or pass through the portal. An LED light or the equivalent can be positioned on the drive console of the vehicle to inform the driver to stop and proceed. A stop and go light arrangement can also be positioned within the field of view of the driver to achieve the desired communication. Alternatively, the host computer receiving pallet information can interface with pallet transporting vehicle by displaying on a console where the pallet is to be stored within the warehouse.
Reference should now be made of
It will also be appreciated that interrogator 130 will draw a considerable amount of power for operation. Interrogator 130 is therefore active, with power supplied from a battery 132. From time to time, interrogator battery 132 may be replaced according to a maintenance schedule contained in data array of one of tags 18, preferably tag 18a. As was also the case with tags 18, interrogator 130 will fail if delicate instruments 133, memory and integrated circuit chips 133a or circuitry 135 printed on a circuit board 137 are damaged during the high temperature and compression events of the thermoforming process. Intervention is thus required to insert battery-powered devise(s) 16 between sheets of plastic.
Interrogator 130 is enclosed in a heat and compression resistant thermoplastic housing 134. The housing base 134b has a flange and thread section 135. Thread section 135 accepts a thermoplastic seal and threaded plate 136. The plate 136 is removable to replace or recharge battery 132. Tags 18 may also be embedded in pallet 4 inside housing 134. Alternatively, tags 18 are manufactured or deposited upon circuit board 137 of interrogator 130. As shown battery, 132 may be mounted to plate 136 adapted to reconnect the battery as the plate is threaded to a closed position. Spring terminals 138, concentrically arranged about an axis corresponding to the rotational path of the terminals 139 on the affixed battery 132, are developed to ensure robust connection and enduring power supply. An EMI shield 141 is provided to prevent tag reading interference; otherwise multiple pallets with goods on each pallet stored on warehouse racking may demand the use of a directional antenna 142. Housing flange 135 is larger in diameter than the circuit board assembly. The circuit board assembly can be removed for maintenance, upgrading and recycling of the pallet 4. It is preferred that the housing 134 is recyclable with pallet when emptied. Other arrangements enclosing the devises in protective housings to withstand the rigors of thermoforming are also practical.
In order for the pallet interrogator 130 to communicate with a LAN PC, a Wireless Wide Area Communication System 140 is added. System 140 can be a cellular communicator inter-operating in an open standard environment. In the event FCC's E-911 mandate precludes utilizing cellular communications in this application (i.e. GPS), an alternative technology that can be used is wireless PC communications. The circuitry of a RF based interface PC card for a mobile PC devise could be deposited upon circuit board 137. A local area Ethernet communicator interfaces the PC card circuitry with a LAN PC, and through the LAN PC by the Internet to host computer(s) 80. One or more circuit board antennas 142 may be slave to several communications devises, as is battery 132.
In the triple sheet configuration of
The wireless interrogator is instructed to identify a plurality or sub-set of the RFID tags associated with articles supported upon the pallet. Thus, a pallet would be able to perform, for example, its own inventory check by arrangement.
The present invention is further advantageous over conventional systems, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,527, since inserting a wireless active interrogator in a plastic pallet of the present invention allows transportability and can be instructed to perform an operation anywhere or at any selected time within the wireless network. Examples of such a wireless network includes digital telephony, satellite communications, wireless Internet, microwave, cellular transmission and the like. Among other alternative embodiments of this aspect, is an optional renewable power supply devise 351 (see
Moreover, the wireless active interrogators could also be positioned within a molded structure forming part of the plastic pallet. A battery supply information field could be part of the manufacturing memory tag or third party pallet management memory array as preventative maintenance schedule field.
Yet another advantage of the aspect of encapsulating a plurality of RFID devises within the structure of a thermoformed pallet is that the same pallet can be tracked through different networks that interface according to differing substantially proprietary protocols. There are several popular data encoding methods, at least three data modulation standards and a handful of proprietary anti-collision backscatter formats. It is unlikely that in the future, one devise will be able to interface will all deployed systems, because an open standard for interoperability has not overcome issues with respect to proprietary technologies. There is also a range of operating environments and computer operating system platforms to interface with. A combination of devises within one product that enables functionality at many locations with pre-existing system infrastructures will help propel the plastic pallet through the distribution system. Notwithstanding one tag devise with several proprietary circuits could be coupled with one or more memory chips, and one antenna coil.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, one or a plurality of RFID devises may be provided within a single plastic pallet. For example, one such tag may be dedicated to manufacturing, material and recycle information storage. One tag may be specifically adapted for pallet tracking within the distribution system. The pallet may also host a third RFID devise specified by third parties for specialized inventory tracking activities within closed-loop or associated distribution networks. A fourth tag may be developed to consolidate the data arrays of several tags transported upon the pallet for more efficient data compression and transfer. A fifth tag may be adapted for interfacing with the RFID systems deployed by the trucking industry. Accordingly, one or more RFID devises may be embedded within one pallet to facilitate one or more operations according to different implementation objectives that ultimately increase the efficiency of plastic pallets.
According to this additional preferred aspect of the present invention, one RFID devise maybe used during the manufacturing process. A relatively simple, programmable passive RFID device that provides a bi-directional interface for one-time programming and multiple readings of the memory is used. The tag on the plastic sheet is interrogated to instruct the PLC of the thermoforming machine how the sheet is to be processed. In one such example, even though the standard 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet is designed to carry 2,800 pounds, the GMA claims approximately 30% of the unit loads weigh less than 1,000 pounds, and 66% of unit loads weight less than 2,000 pounds. Accordingly, the preferred thermoforming method may be used to produce a select range of standard plastic pallets, that are produced using different plastic formulations and processing guidelines, to meet different distribution system needs. The machine PLC may then be instructed to communicate to the tooling to instruct the tooling how to process the successive sheets. The thermoforming machine, production tooling and sheet materials thus interface with each other to recognize, synchronize, authenticate, implement and record manufacturing results to a manufacturing biased host computer. The memory array of the proposed devise is limited to read-only data transmission and is disabled from accepting further programming or erasing instructions once the pallet is made but before the tagged pallet enters the pallet supply stream. The memory array of the manufacturing related RFID devise will contain information pertaining to manufacture date, serial number, load bearing capabilities, operating temperatures, material composition, repair instructions, expiration date, recycling requirements, ownership, ISO certificates and the like. The data contained in the array could be tailored toward the needs of a third party pallet rental/leasing company, which can schedule and perform RFID and pallet maintenance.
This embodiment is explained in more detail as follows, with reference to
The tags are sequentially deposited upon a roll at which point the tags receive selective data information which is pre-programmed or stored in the memory of each tag. The pre-formed sheets, containing the RFID tag, are subsequently conveyed to the thermoforming plant or machinery for processing into end products, shown in the figure as product A and product B.
The RFID tag on the sheet traverse and travel through the interrogation filed prior to entry of the sheet into the thermoforming machine. Data previously stored and programmed into the RFID tag memory is thereby communicated to the thermoforming machine PLC attached to the interrogator. The PLC thereby analyses the received data and adjusts the manufacturing operation and machinery as predetermined for the specific data criteria analyzed.
For example, fire retardant fillers in the plastic sheet require a longer period of time for heating in the ovens. Thus, data regarding the presence of fire retardant materials, which has been previously programmed or stored in the RFID tag memory, instructs the PLC of its presence and the PLC then controls the machinery to provide increased heat in the ovens for the specific sheet about to enter the ovens. The next sheet to be processed many not have a fire retardant filler and thus the PLC will accordingly vary the machinery and processing operation to reduce the oven heat applied to that subsequent sheet to be processed. In another example, an end product may be desired to have a metal frame inserted for increased load bearing strength. When the interrogator receives this information from the RFID tag attached to a sheet to be processed, the PLC operating the processing machinery will then instruct an auxiliary input A machine to insert a metal frame between a pair of sheets being processed. This can be done by a robotic arm or through other automation. The process is completed according to the preprogrammed manufacturing instructions in the machinery PLC, as altered or varied by data stored in the RFID tag for each sheet being processed. After completion, the PLC communicates the record of completion to a network computer for billing purposes and other statistical process control information.
Still according to this aspect of the present invention, one or more RFID devises can be used to identify, locate and track a pallet within the distribution network throughout the pallet's life cycle. In the manner, computer based tools can be utilized to increase the velocity of the pallet through the system. In other words, the pallets are managed as an asset rather than an expense. The pallet is tracked using a more complex programmable RFID device that provides a variety of operating modes (single tag/multiple tag environments), including multiple write and read (EEPROM) capabilities. Tagged pallets traverse interrogation fields distributed throughout the distribution network to record the pallet's progress through the distribution system. The RFID devises include anti-collision modulation options to resolve backscatter when multiple tags are in the same interrogation fields. Automatic pallet material handling equipment is upgraded to accommodate readers and communicators. Supply chain management and control of the movement of pallets through the distribution system are facilitated with real-time data input from the integrated RFID system. Host, interrogator and tag interface according to various implementation criteria, such as last scan time & date, movement order number field, “from” field, “to” field, shipper field, pallet rental release field, and pallet return instructions. RFID technology provides a two-way flow of information between the pallet and the system server to help propel the pallet through the distribution system. The RFID devise may also carry its own electronic manifest. A more efficient use of plastic pallets will reduce the total number of pallets required by the over all distribution system.
According to a further feature of the invention, each RFID devise that may be contained in the pallet may be developed to operate on different radio frequencies (13.56 megahertz to 2.45 gigahertz) in order to optimize system performance and minimize the cost of interrogators and tags. Each devise may use a different coding waveform algorithm to reduce data recovery errors, bandwidth problems, synchronization limitations and other system design and cost considerations. For example, the pallet manufacturer does not need interrogation systems interfacing with the tracking systems, and versa visa. Thus, a less elaborate and costly RFID system is needed by the thermoforming manufacturer to deploy RFID systems. Similar tag devise transmissions may be echeloned according to prescribed system criteria or other pallet management tools or model algorithms.
As Faraday's law and Lenz's law are well known, it is also understood that the parallel orientation, and distance between the reader and tag antenna coils in respect of each other are important for the successful operation of passive RFID devises in particular. Read range is lower in higher frequency passive RFID devises. Furthermore, it is understood that induction is maximized when the antenna coils are perpendicular to the direction of the radio frequency signal. Therefore, another feature of the present invention provides for encapsulation of RFID devises within the structure of the plastic pallet. In one embodiment, an interrogator is contained in a vertical freestanding structure off to the side of the path traveled by the RFID devise. Accordingly, the antenna coils located in the interrogator and pallet are vertically oriented in approximate parallel condition to facilitate a proper signal transmission. In another embodiment, an interrogator is placed upon or under ground along the path traveled by the pallet, or alternatively suspended from above. In such an arrangement, it is advantageous to orient the respective antenna coils substantially horizontal in an approximate parallel condition to facilitate induction. These later arrangements would be difficult to duplicate and implement with wooden pallets because water absorbed by the wood would impede or reflect the RF signal away from the tag antenna.
A further preferred method of attaching RFID tags to polymeric sheets is as follows, with reference to
It is alternately envisioned that the film is colored so that it can be used to indicate tag location inside of a pallet for correct orientation to provide accurate readings as previously disclosed. For example, a plurality of colored films may be applied to denote RFID tag implementation criteria. For example,
Another preferred embodiment application of the thermoforming and communications device technology is shown in
A communications device 621 is attached to an inside surface of sheet 607 within top hollow section 611 prior to thermoforming, as was previously disclosed herein with the pallet manufacturing. As the fuel is removed for engine combustion, environmentally hazardous gases are left to fill the space unoccupied by the fuel. Top hollow section 611 acts as a reservoir that contains the harmful gases that would otherwise escape through the devices 613 into the environment. The devices 613 can also recirculate the gas back into the lower hollow sections 609, in a conventional manner. An instrument section of communications device 621 is operable to inspect and monitor the barrier performance of top hollow section 611 to ensure compliance with governmental regulations. When the vehicle is inspected, the data generated and stored by the instrument of device 621 is then conveyed through radio frequency communications to an external monitoring device operated by the governmental regulating authority for inspection purposes. The instrument section of device 621 can be battery activated in an active manner to provide regular intervals of inspection, can be passive to receive power when externally interrogated, or can be triggered one time when a predetermined threshold is met.
A further preferred application of the present invention is shown in
While the preferred embodiment of the thermoformed pallet having a radio frequency device has been disclosed, it should be appreciated that other variations may be employed. For example, with a shuttle type delivery system and methodology, the gantry and laminator apparatus are not required. There are several other methodologies that may be used to practice the useful purposes of embedding sophisticated communications and other technological devices within the structure of a plastic pallet 2. Furthermore, analog or solid state circuitry can be employed instead of the microprocessors, integrated circuits and computers disclosed. There are a number of different reinforcing structures that can be molded into two or more sheets of plastic to reinforce the area around the devices 16. It is not necessary to form a complete chamber in plastic, so long as device 16 remains in the areas developed to protect the device from thermoforming shock, and operating wear and tear. It is also understood that access to the devices may be from the top or bottom in the wide variety of pallets contemplated in the present methodology. Furthermore, the RFID tags can also be attached to other heat and pressure formable sheets, such as cardboard, fiberglass, or the like, prior to three dimensional forming of the sheets. Additionally, the RFID tags and other electrical communications devices can be employed to monitor food conditions within a food container. While various materials have been disclosed, it should be appreciated that other materials can be employed. It is intended by the following claims to cover these and any other departures from the disclosed embodiments which fall within the true spirit of this invention.
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No 11/102,221 filed on Apr. 8, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/770,097 filed on Jan. 24, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,943,678 issued Sep. 13, 2005, and U.S. Provisional application No. 60/177,383, filed on Jan. 24, 2000. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3398434 | Alesi, Jr. et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3583036 | Brown | Jun 1971 | A |
3597799 | Earle | Aug 1971 | A |
3695188 | Granastein | Oct 1972 | A |
3702100 | Wharton | Nov 1972 | A |
3779687 | Alesi | Dec 1973 | A |
3783078 | Brodhead | Jan 1974 | A |
3787158 | Brown et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3867088 | Brown et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3868209 | Howell | Feb 1975 | A |
3919382 | Smarook | Nov 1975 | A |
3919445 | Smarook | Nov 1975 | A |
3919446 | Smarook | Nov 1975 | A |
3964400 | Brand | Jun 1976 | A |
4013021 | Steinlein et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4070839 | Clem | Jan 1978 | A |
4079232 | Brokoff et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4101252 | Brown | Jul 1978 | A |
4113909 | Beasley | Sep 1978 | A |
4133270 | Ravera | Jan 1979 | A |
4158539 | Arends et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4164387 | Schermutzki et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4164389 | Beasley | Aug 1979 | A |
4194663 | West et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4244915 | Boardman | Jan 1981 | A |
4255382 | Arends et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4287836 | Aoki | Sep 1981 | A |
4348442 | Figge | Sep 1982 | A |
4377377 | Arends et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4428306 | Dresen et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4464329 | Whiteside et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4488496 | Polacco | Dec 1984 | A |
4500213 | Grimm | Feb 1985 | A |
4507348 | Nagata et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4509432 | Win | Apr 1985 | A |
4509909 | Arends | Apr 1985 | A |
4513048 | Kaube et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4531901 | Andersen | Jul 1985 | A |
4555381 | Chazal et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4600376 | Gillman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4606278 | Shuert | Aug 1986 | A |
4608009 | Whiteside et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4636348 | Whiteside | Jan 1987 | A |
4649007 | Bonis et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4666544 | Whiteside et al. | May 1987 | A |
4742781 | Shuert | May 1988 | A |
4801347 | Garwood | Jan 1989 | A |
4846077 | Win | Jul 1989 | A |
4907515 | Win | Mar 1990 | A |
4969812 | Brown | Nov 1990 | A |
5007225 | Teasdale | Apr 1991 | A |
5030501 | Colvin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5042396 | Shuert | Aug 1991 | A |
5046434 | Breezer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5071603 | Kurumaji et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5088418 | Reckermann et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5108529 | Shuert | Apr 1992 | A |
5117762 | Shuert | Jun 1992 | A |
5123359 | DelBalso | Jun 1992 | A |
5123541 | Giannini et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5143778 | Shuert | Sep 1992 | A |
5156782 | Ballantyne | Oct 1992 | A |
5164211 | Comer | Nov 1992 | A |
5167969 | DeMaio, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5168817 | Nulle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197395 | Pigott et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197396 | Breezer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5225213 | Brown et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5226373 | Esch | Jul 1993 | A |
5229648 | Sues et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5252024 | Breda et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255613 | Shuert | Oct 1993 | A |
5283028 | Breezer et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5283029 | Ellemor | Feb 1994 | A |
5329861 | McCarthy | Jul 1994 | A |
5329862 | Breezer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337681 | Schrage | Aug 1994 | A |
5351627 | Junaedi | Oct 1994 | A |
5351628 | Breezer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5351629 | Breezer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5367960 | Schleicher | Nov 1994 | A |
5367961 | Arai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5390467 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5391251 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5401347 | Shuert | Mar 1995 | A |
5402735 | DeJean | Apr 1995 | A |
5404829 | Shuert | Apr 1995 | A |
5407632 | Constantino et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408937 | Knight, IV et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413052 | Breezer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427732 | Shuert | Jun 1995 | A |
5448110 | Tuttle et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5470641 | Shuert | Nov 1995 | A |
5479416 | Snodgrass et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488405 | Kawaoka | Jan 1996 | A |
5492069 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505141 | Barber | Apr 1996 | A |
5517188 | Carroll et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527585 | Needham et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531585 | Lupke | Jul 1996 | A |
5535668 | Besaw et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539775 | Tuttle et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555820 | Shuert | Sep 1996 | A |
5556858 | Strupczewski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5565846 | Geizler | Oct 1996 | A |
5583819 | Roesner et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596933 | Knight et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606921 | Elder et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620715 | Hart et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624622 | Boyce et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624630 | Breezer et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5635129 | Breezer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635306 | Minamida et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638760 | Jordan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649295 | Shober et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657007 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661457 | Ghaffari et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662048 | Kralj et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664322 | Best | Sep 1997 | A |
5676064 | Shuert | Oct 1997 | A |
5686928 | Pritchett et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687652 | Ruma | Nov 1997 | A |
5708423 | Ghaffari et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716581 | Tirrell et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730252 | Herbinet | Mar 1998 | A |
5755162 | Knight et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769003 | Rose et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774876 | Woolley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778801 | Delacour | Jul 1998 | A |
5782129 | Vanderzee et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791262 | Knight et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794542 | Besaw | Aug 1998 | A |
5794544 | Shuert | Aug 1998 | A |
5800846 | Hart | Sep 1998 | A |
5804810 | Woolley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813355 | Brown et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814185 | Chun et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818348 | Walczak et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822683 | Pashen | Oct 1998 | A |
5822714 | Cato | Oct 1998 | A |
5830299 | Teixidor Casanovas et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836255 | Uitz | Nov 1998 | A |
5843366 | Shuert | Dec 1998 | A |
5845588 | Gronnevik | Dec 1998 | A |
5860369 | John et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862760 | Kohlhaas | Jan 1999 | A |
5864318 | Cosenza et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868080 | Wyler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879495 | Evans | Mar 1999 | A |
5885691 | Breezer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894803 | Kuga | Apr 1999 | A |
5900203 | Needham et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908135 | Bradford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921189 | Estepp | Jul 1999 | A |
5929779 | MacLellan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933354 | Shimada et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936527 | Isaacman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942987 | Heinrich et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950545 | Shuert | Sep 1999 | A |
5950546 | Brown et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955950 | Gallagher, III et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959568 | Woolley | Sep 1999 | A |
5963144 | Kruest | Oct 1999 | A |
5967057 | Nakayama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971592 | Kralj et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973599 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975879 | Dresen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980231 | Arends et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986569 | Mish et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986570 | Black et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993724 | Shuert | Nov 1999 | A |
5999091 | Wortham | Dec 1999 | A |
6006677 | Apps et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013949 | Tuttle | Jan 2000 | A |
6018641 | Tsubouchi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018927 | Major | Feb 2000 | A |
6021721 | Rushton | Feb 2000 | A |
6025780 | Bowers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026304 | Hilsenrath et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027027 | Smithgall | Feb 2000 | A |
6029583 | LeTrudet | Feb 2000 | A |
6107698 | Ochiai et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6172608 | Cole | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199488 | Favaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212401 | Ackley | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246882 | Lachance | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302461 | Debras | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6389989 | Hagerty | May 2002 | B1 |
6456852 | Bar et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6483434 | UmiKer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496806 | Horwitz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6542114 | Eagleson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6583417 | Stock | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6614349 | Proctor et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6667092 | Brollier et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669089 | Cybulski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687238 | Soong et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702968 | Stevenson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720866 | Sorrells et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720868 | Flick | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726099 | Becker et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735630 | Gelvin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738628 | McCall et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745703 | Torrey et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750771 | Brand | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6778089 | Yoakum | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6779088 | Benveniste et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6801833 | Pintsov et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806808 | Watters et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812824 | Goldinger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6814287 | Chang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816076 | Pomes | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817522 | Brignone et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830181 | Bennett | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832251 | Gelvin et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6844857 | Loftus et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847892 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6889165 | Lind et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895221 | Gunnarsson | May 2005 | B2 |
6895255 | Bridgelall | May 2005 | B1 |
6900731 | Kreiner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903656 | Lee | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917808 | Nelson | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6933849 | Sawyer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940392 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6941184 | Ebert | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943678 | Muirhead | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7419101 | Kawai | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20020017745 | Vorenkamp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020487 | Vorenkamp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020705 | Vorenkamp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021208 | Nicholson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020111819 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115436 | Howell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126013 | Bridgelall | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130817 | Forster et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020170961 | Dickson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196771 | Vij et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030083920 | Richards et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040046643 | Becker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056779 | Rast | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061324 | Howard | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069851 | Grunes et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069852 | Seppinen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070504 | Brollier et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078151 | Aljadeff et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082296 | Twitchell, Jr. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085191 | Horwitz et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105411 | Boatwright et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106376 | Forster | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111335 | Black et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040171373 | Suda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174260 | Wagner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177032 | Bradley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185667 | Jenson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203352 | Hall et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212479 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217865 | Turner | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226392 | McNally | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233789 | Oguchi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239498 | Miller | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252025 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024200 | Lambright et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030160 | Goren et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040934 | Shanton | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043850 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054290 | Logan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060246 | Lastinger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071234 | Schon | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076816 | Nakano | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083177 | Willgert | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083180 | Horwitz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097010 | Carrender | May 2005 | A1 |
20050099292 | Sajkowsky | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103835 | Kunito et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104747 | Silic et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107092 | Charych et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050140511 | Bonnell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143133 | Bridgelall et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050168325 | Lievre et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194446 | Wiklof et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195775 | Petite et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198208 | Nystrom | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198228 | Bajwa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205676 | Saito | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206520 | Decker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232747 | Brackmann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237195 | Urban | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060163350 | Melton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070084919 | Petrovich | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089773 | Koester et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1002359 | Dec 1976 | CA |
4313049 | Apr 1993 | DE |
4334668 | Apr 1995 | DE |
19526131 | Jan 1997 | DE |
0025510 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0249203 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0412020 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0458722 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0535919 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0905057 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1382533 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2697801 | May 1994 | FR |
2081898 | Mar 1990 | JP |
2152898 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2163202 | Jun 1990 | JP |
4173699 | Jun 1992 | JP |
5085545 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5155600 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5262499 | Oct 1993 | JP |
6072441 | Mar 1994 | JP |
8011885 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8244773 | Sep 1996 | JP |
9-41756 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9254983 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-32851 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10182096 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10250735 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10305997 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11001230 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2000103505 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001026309 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001233337 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001278270 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002154618 | May 2002 | JP |
2002255173 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002265060 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002321725 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003054898 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003095270 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2 143 508 | Dec 1999 | RU |
2 226 231 | Mar 2004 | RU |
WO9424010 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO9821691 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9964221 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0036212 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070163472 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60177383 | Jan 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11102221 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11704613 | US |